Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Two-phonon pairing and superconductivity in $SrTiO_3$

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two-phonon pairing cannot explain superconductivity in doped SrTiO3: the high-energy cutoff, not the soft mode, controls the coupling.

desk verdict Dispersive two-phonon Eliashberg treatment kills the naive Ngai mechanism in STO, but the negative conclusion leans on an unquantified local-coupling assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03823 v1 pith:BA3DZYZB submitted 2026-08-04 cond-mat.supr-con

Antonio Santacesaria , Cristiano Muzzi , Maria Eleonora Temperini , Paolo Barone , Maria N. Gastiasoro , José Lorenzana This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords two-phononpairingstrontiumtitanatesuperconductivityEliashbergtheoryferroelectricquantumcriticalpointelectron-phononcouplingsoftphononsNgaimechanism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the two-phonon pairing mechanism proposed by Ngai—an electron scattering off two soft transverse optical phonons at once—can explain superconductivity in doped strontium titanate (STO), the lowest-density superconductor known. It shows that although the quadratic electron–phonon deformation potential is large (about 40 eV/Ų from both DFT and experimental estimates), the effective attraction is set by an average of phonon processes over the whole Brillouin zone, so the relevant energy scale is the high-frequency cutoff of about 50 meV rather than the soft-mode energy of about 1 meV. As a result, the computed critical temperature stays negligibly small even at the ferroelectric quantum critical point, and the predicted Tc increases monotonically with doping, in conflict with the measured superconducting dome. The authors conclude that the two-phonon mechanism cannot by itself explain STO superconductivity, although it may contribute alongside other channels, and they point to materials with soft optical modes that stay soft across the whole Brillouin zone—hafnia and filled skutterudites—as the places where the mechanism could become strong.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-phonon Eliashberg function α²F(Q,Ω), built from the soft TO-phonon dispersion ω_q = √(ω_Γ,TO² + c²q²) and the momentum-dependent Debye cutoff ω_D(Q), whose zone-center value is ω_DΓ = c q_D ≈ 50 meV. It replaces the naive local estimate V ≈ -(αl²)²/2ℏω₀, which diverges as 1/ω₀³ with the soft frequency, with the momentum-averaged interaction V_eff ∝ (V₀/2) log[(Ω² + 4ω²_{Q/2})/(Ω² + 4ω²_D(Q))], where V₀ = 3ℏα²/(8μ_S² ω_DΓ³). Because V₀ carries 1/ω_DΓ³, the high-energy cutoff suppresses the attraction by roughly five orders of magnitude relative to the soft-mode estimate, leaving only a logarithmic singularity at the quantum critical point. That ratio—soft-mo

What would settle it

A first-principles computation of the full momentum dependence of the quadratic electron–phonon coupling α(q,q′) for the Slater mode: if the vertex is sharply enhanced at small momenta, the effective coupling could exceed the paper's estimate by the needed factor of about three and push Tc into the observed range. Conversely, superconductivity in a doped hafnia or skutterudite whose soft phonon stays soft across the whole Brillouin zone—with Tc tracking the soft-mode energy rather than the high-frequency cutoff—would directly test the paper's prediction that two-phonon pairing needs flat soft

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is negative: Ngai's two-phonon mechanism cannot explain superconductivity in doped STO. The paper derives the two-phonon Eliashberg function for the soft transverse (Slater) modes and shows that, despite a quadratic deformation potential α ≈ 40 eV/Ų that is large by any measure, the dimensionless coupling Λ ≈ 0.08 is roughly three times too small to yield the observed Tc. The reason is that the two-phonon spectral function averages over all momenta, so the coupling's energy denominator is the Debye-like cutoff ω_DΓ ≈ 50 meV, not the soft-mode frequency ≈ 1 meV; approaching the ferroelectric quantum critical point enhances the attraction only logar

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the quadratic electron–phonon coupling is local and momentum-independent apart from the phonon-frequency factors; if the true coupling were strongly peaked near the zone center, the soft modes could dominate the momentum average and the conclusion could flip.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Within the paper's model, the two-phonon channel alone produces a Tc far below the observed range in STO even when parameters are chosen in its favor, with α above the experimental estimates and phonons softer than the accurate dispersions.
  • The effective coupling is set by the high-energy cutoff of the two-phonon spectrum: softening near the zone center contributes only logarithmically, so proximity to the ferroelectric quantum critical point does not control Tc.
  • The theory's Tc rises monotonically with doping, so the two-phonon mechanism cannot be the sole driver of the measured superconducting dome, which peaks at intermediate density and falls at high doping.
  • Two-phonon pairing is not disproven as a contributing channel; the paper leaves open a subdominant contribution, consistent with other recent proposals for STO and KTaO₃.
  • Materials with soft optical modes that stay soft throughout the Brillouin zone—flat phonon bands in hafnia, Einstein-like phonons in filled skutterudites—are identified as the conditions under which the mechanism could become dominant.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The negative result is generic for any pairing channel mediated by a strongly dispersive boson: if the boson softens only in a tiny region of the Brillouin zone, phase space dilutes it. The paper's machinery could be read as a screening criterion—estimate the Brillouin-zone average of the coupling, not the zone-center value, before predicting Tc.
  • A nonlocal, momentum-dependent quadratic coupling with the vertex peaked at small momentum transfer would break the paper's locality assumption and could restore soft-mode dominance; computing the full q-dependence of α(q,q′) beyond the local approximation is a direct test of that possibility.
  • The doping-dependence mismatch suggests the experimental dome in STO is set by a different ingredient—possibly the one-phonon soft-mode channel, multiband effects, or a competing boson—with two-phonon exchange acting only as a small correction.
  • The same Eliashberg construction could be applied to KTaO₃ and to doped hafnia; if a flat soft-band material shows a dome whose Tc tracks the soft-mode energy rather than the high-frequency cutoff, that would validate the mechanism where STO cannot.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper tests the Ngai two-phonon pairing mechanism in doped SrTiO3. The authors obtain the two-phonon deformation potential α from four independent routes—DFT eigenvalue shifts, DFT total-energy spring-constant hardening, and two empirical fits—that agree to within a factor of 2–3. They derive the effective electron-electron interaction mediated by exchange of two transverse optical phonons via a Schrieffer–Wolff transformation and solve a one-loop Eliashberg equation with a momentum-dependent Debye cutoff. The central result is that, although α is large, the phase-space average in the two-phonon Eliashberg function is controlled by the high-energy cutoff ω_DΓ ≈ 50 meV rather than by the soft-mode frequency. The resulting coupling is weak (Λ ≈ 0.08), the computed Tc is negligible, and the predicted Tc increases monotonically with doping, in contrast to the observed dome. The paper concludes that the Ngai mechanism cannot explain superconductivity in STO and proposes conditions—flat soft modes across the Brillouin zone—under which the mechanism could be effective in other materials.

Significance. If accepted, this is an important negative result for an actively discussed candidate mechanism in doped STO. The paper is self-contained: the Eliashberg derivation is detailed and internally consistent, the parameter choices are conservative (α = 40 eV/Ų, f̄ = 2, ωΓ,TO = 0), and the DFT and empirical estimates cross-check the deformation potential. The predicted monotonic doping dependence is falsifiable. The main limitation is the local, q-independent form of the electron–two-phonon coupling, which is not quantitatively bounded. Because that approximation enters the central negative conclusion, the significance of the paper is conditional on its validity for finite-q phonons.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II A, Eq. (7); Sec. IV, Eq. (54)] The local, momentum-independent deformation potential α is load-bearing. Table I, Eq. (11), and Sec. II D all probe uniform (q=0) displacements. The smallness of Tc follows from the phase-space cancellation at Q=0: with g ∝ α/√(ω_q ω_q'), the p² factor cancels the soft 1/ω_p² divergence and α²F is cutoff-dominated (Eqs. (61)–(64)). If the physical α(q,q') is enhanced near the zone center, the integrand becomes |α(p)|²/c² and the 1/ω_Γ³ enhancement of the toy model can be restored; a momentum-dependent form factor could supply the factor ~3 in Λ that separates the computed Tc from observable values. The manuscript explicitly notes the local approximation but does not bound its error. I request a finite-q calculation (DFPT or frozen-phonon supercell) or a symmetry/causality-based bound on α(q,q').
  2. [Sec. II B, Table I] Restricting the soft-mode pattern to the Slater mode alone may be consequential. The text states that the Last and oxygen-octahedra modes have α ≈ 10–40 eV/Ų but are neglected because their weights in the soft mode are small; no quantitative weights or finite-q matrix elements are given. Since all estimates of α are obtained at Γ, these modes could contribute to the finite-q vertex discussed above. The statement that the weights are small should be quantified, e.g., from the mode eigenvectors of Refs. [34,35] or from explicit frozen-phonon calculations, before the conclusion can be regarded as robust.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. VII] The wording 'cannot be excluded based on Tc magnitude' and 'too small to explain superconductivity' is slightly ambiguous; 'cannot be excluded as the dominant/sole mechanism' would clarify the intended meaning.
  2. [Eq. (27)] The definition of the angular factor f̄ is terse. Please state explicitly whether |g(q,q')|² carries f or √f, since later the bound 1 ≤ f̄ ≤ 2 is used in V0.
  3. [Sec. VI, Fig. 11] The monotonicity comparison with the experimental dome is made in a one-band model held at the QCP for all doping. Multi-band effects enter at the upper end of the dome, so the doping-shape mismatch is weaker evidence than the smallness of Tc; the text could say so.
  4. [Sec. II D] The empirical estimates of α are based on different dopants, temperatures, and assumptions about carrier count; the factor-of-2–3 spread is material. Reporting fit ranges/error bars for the values extracted from Refs. [37,38] would make the comparison more quantitative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the negative two-phonon result is computed from independently determined parameters and compared with experiment as a falsifiable prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The two-phonon deformation potential α is obtained from DFT band-shift and total-energy calculations (Secs. II B and II C, Table I) and from empirical phonon-frequency data (Sec. II D); the phonon dispersion/cutoff ωDΓ is taken from neutron scattering (Ref. [46], Eq. (58)); and the mass/bandwidth W is taken from independent quantum-oscillation and specific-heat data. These inputs feed the derived two-phonon Eliashberg function (Eqs. (54), (61), (62)), from which Tc is computed as a function of doping. No parameter is fitted to the experimental Tc: the paper explicitly finds a monotonically increasing Tc(x) that disagrees with the observed superconducting dome, so the central negative claim is a falsifiable prediction rather than a fit. The conclusion that soft phonons do not control Tc follows analytically from the phase-space average of the local vertex (Eq. (10)) with the dispersive TO phonon (Eq. (20)), not from an input already containing the conclusion. The main genuine limitation—the local, q-independent vertex in Eq. (7)—is acknowledged in the text ('for the sake of simplicity, we are assuming that the electron-two-phonon interaction is local') and could change the magnitude if α(q) were strongly momentum dependent; but an unvalidated approximation is a correctness risk, not circularity. Self-citations to the authors' earlier DFT and strong-coupling work (Refs. [17,18,27]) are contextual and are not load-bearing for the present negative claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the choice of α and on the assumption that the quadratic electron-phonon coupling is local and dominated by the Slater mode. No new entities are introduced. The parameters are either measured inputs or conservative upper bounds.

free parameters (3)
  • Two-phonon deformation potential α = 40 eV/Ų
    Average of DFT estimates in Table I; empirical estimates range 10-21 eV/Ų. Chosen conservatively large to overestimate coupling.
  • Angular factor f̄ = 2 (upper bound)
    Angular function f(q,q') is bounded between 1 and 2; the maximum is used to give an upper bound on Tc.
  • Soft-mode gap ωΓ,TO = 0 (ferroelectric QCP)
    Set to zero for all dopings to maximize Tc; more realistic values (1-6 meV) would further reduce Tc.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The soft mode is well represented by the Slater mode; contributions from the Last and oxygen-octahedra modes to the two-phonon deformation potential are small.
    Invoked in Sec. II B when restricting the estimate to the Slater displacement; the octahedra mode has a large linear (Rashba) coupling but its weight to the soft mode is small.
  • domain assumption The electron-two-phonon interaction is local with a single scalar deformation potential α, so the coupling vertex g(q,q') ∝ 1/√(ωqωq') has no additional momentum dependence.
    Eq. (7) assumes locality; the DFT calculation only determines the Γ-point rigid shift, so the q-dependence of α is unknown. This is the main structural assumption behind the phase-space averaging.
  • domain assumption The TO phonon branches are isotropic, degenerate, and follow ωq = sqrt(ωΓ² + c²q²) up to a Debye cutoff.
    Eq. (20) and Sec. IV; used to derive the two-phonon DOS and Eliashberg function. Real STO has two slightly split TO branches and tetragonal anisotropy.
  • domain assumption The one-loop Eliashberg equations with Z=1, χ=0 and the interaction evaluated at the Fermi momentum give a quantitatively reliable Tc in the weak-coupling regime, despite Migdal's theorem not applying.
    Sec. V E; justified a posteriori by the small λ and by the gap peaking at low Matsubara frequencies, but vertex corrections are not computed.
  • domain assumption The density of two-phonon states can be modeled with a momentum-dependent Debye cutoff ωD(Q) defined by Eq. (57).
    Sec. V C; introduces the cutoff that sets the V0 scale. The approximation (59) reproduces the exact DOS cutoff.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-phonon pairing and superconductivity in $SrTiO_3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BA3DZYZB

@misc{pith2026260803823,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-phonon pairing and superconductivity in $SrTiO_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BA3DZYZB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03823}
}
abstract

We explore the possibility that the two-phonon pairing mechanism proposed by Ngai can explain superconductivity in doped strontium titanate (STO). The two-phonon deformation potential is evaluated using two distinct theoretical estimates based on first-principles calculations and two empirical estimates based on experimental data, yielding very large values of the same order of magnitude. We derive the effective electron-electron interaction mediated by two-phonon exchange. Crucial to our computations is the strong dispersion of the involved soft phonons. Because the scale of the two-phonon interaction is much larger than the Fermi energy, the Migdal theorem does not apply. We obtain a one-loop Eliashberg equation that can be solved in the weak-coupling limit. We find that despite the significant electron-phonon matrix element, phase space considerations considerably reduce the effective coupling. A two-phonon mechanism can not be excluded based on the $T_c$ magnitude, but its value is dominated by the high-energy-frequency physics and is weakly affected by the soft-phonon behavior. The theory predicts a $T_c$ that monotonously increases with doping, which is not in accordance with the experiment. We identify the conditions for a two-phonon mechanism to be effective in other materials and discuss possible candidates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03823 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SrTiO3 cubic unit cell. We show oxygen atoms in red, titanium atoms in blue, and strontium atoms in green. Black arrows represent the Slater mode displacements, for which oxygen atoms move coherently as a cage with opposite phases with respect to the titanium atom while strontium atoms are fixed in their equilibrium position. Notice that DFT calculations have been made with the tetragonal unit cell. mode. Our frozen… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Band shift δn as a function of the relative displace￾ment between oxygen and titanium squared u 2 S. Solid symbols are the DFT data, while the lines are a linear fit. The dif￾ferent colors indicate the three lower bands using the same conventions as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Linear (a) and quadratic (b) Holstein models. An [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plots comparison of the exact (solid lines) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plots of the real (blue line) and imaginary part [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows the angular-averaged static interaction as a function of the magnitude of the momentum of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Parametric plot of the ratio ωDΓ/ϵF vs. λ fixing parameters as in Table II and varying the Fermi energy in the range 1 − 10 meV as relevant for STO. only non-negative Matsubara frequencies. In the compu￾tations below, we truncated the matrix to 0 ≤ n, n′ < N, leading t…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: shows an example of the momentum and Matsubara frequency dependence of the gap function, ∆(k, iωn), for a moderate value of coupling constant λ = 0.4. As anticipated previously, we find that the gap function is larger at ωn=0 and decays rapidly as the Matsubara freque…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Tc/ωDΓ vs x in the acoustic case (ωΓ,TO = 0) for Λ = 0.22 (blue line), Λ = 0.27 (red line), Λ = 0.32 (green line). ωDΓ/W = 0.4. Tc has been plotted using 60 different values for ϵF /ωDΓ. ωDΓ/W = 0.4, which is the value for STO, but we have to take values of Λ larger t…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The two lowest TO modes according to the com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Schematic of the relation between the tetragonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Instead, for the quadratic model, it scales as 1 /ω3

    This coincides with the finding in BCS theory based on the standard linear electron-phonon coupling. Instead, for the quadratic model, it scales as 1 /ω3

    work page

  2. [2]

    This suggests that the quadratic model can benefit more from soft- phonon effects as found near the FE instability. Indeed, making the replacements ℏω0 →ℏω Γ,TO ≈ 1 meV (valid for undoped STO [ 4]), l→l s ≈ 0.3 ˚A, and α = 40 eV/˚A2 one gets αl2 ≈ 3.6 eV and V2p ≈ −6000 eV, a surprisingly large value. Taking the more realistic value ωΓ,TO ≈ 6 meV measured...

  3. [3]

    K. A. M¨ uller and H. Burkard,SrTiO3: An intrinsic quan- tum paraelectric below 4 K, Phys. Rev. B19, 3593 (1979)

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    G. G. Guzm´ an-Verri, C. H. Liang, and P. B. Littlewood, Lamellar fluctuations melt ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 046801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Metallicity and superconductivity in doped strontium titanate

    C. Collignon, X. Lin, C. W. Rischau, B. Fauqu´ e, and K. Behnia, Metallicity and superconductivity in doped strontium titanate, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 25 (2019), arXiv:1804.07067

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    M. N. Gastiasoro, J. Ruhman, and R. M. Fernandes, Superconductivity in dilute SrTiO 3 : A review, Ann. Phys. (N. Y).417, 168107 (2020), arXiv:1912.01509

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    J. M. Edge, Y. Kedem, U. Aschauer, N. A. Spaldin, and A. V. Balatsky, Quantum Critical Origin of the Supercon- ducting Dome in SrTiO 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 247002 (2015), arXiv:1507.08275

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    W¨ olfle and A

    P. W¨ olfle and A. V. Balatsky, Superconductivity at low density near a ferroelectric quantum critical point: Doped SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. B98, 104505 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Stucky, G

    A. Stucky, G. Scheerer, Z. Ren, D. Jaccard, J. Poumirol, C. Barreteau, E. Giannini, and D. van der Marel, Iso- tope effect in superconducting n-doped SrT iO3, Sci Rep , 122203 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Enderlein, J

    C. Enderlein, J. F. de Oliveira, D. A. Tompsett, E. B. Saitovitch, S. S. Saxena, G. G. Lonzarich, and S. E. Row- ley, Superconductivity mediated by polar modes in ferro- electric metals, Nat. Commun.11, 4852 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Ahadi, L

    K. Ahadi, L. Galletti, Y. Li, S. Salmani-Rezaie, W. Wu, and S. Stemmer, Enhancing superconductivity in SrTiO 3 films with strain, Science Advances5, eaaw0120 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aaw0120

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Russell, N

    R. Russell, N. Ratcliff, K. Ahadi, L. Dong, S. Stemmer, and J. W. Harter, Ferroelectric enhancement of supercon- ductivity in compressively strained SrTiO3 films, Physical Review Materials3, 10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.091401 (2019)

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    Franklin, B

    J. Franklin, B. Xu, D. Davino, A. Mahabir, A. V. Bal- atsky, U. Aschauer, and I. Sochnikov, Giant Gr¨ uneisen parameter in a superconducting quantum paraelectric, Phys. Rev. B103, 1 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    C. W. Rischau, D. Pulmannov´ a, G. W. Scheerer, A. Stucky, E. Giannini, and D. van der Marel, Isotope tuning of the superconducting dome of strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 1 (2022), arXiv:2112.09751

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    P. W. Anderson and E. I. Blount, Symmetry considera- tions on martensitic transformations: ”ferroelectric” met- als?, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 217 (1965)

    1965

  8. [16]

    Klein, V

    A. Klein, V. Kozii, J. Ruhman, and R. M. Fernandes, Theory of criticality for quantum ferroelectric metals, Phys. Rev. B107, 165110 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Phys.(Springer US, Boston, MA, 2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    M. N. Gastiasoro, T. V. Trevisan, and R. M. Fernandes, Anisotropic superconductivity mediated by ferroelectric fluctuations in cubic systems with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B101, 1 (2020), arXiv:2001.04919

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M. N. Gastiasoro, M. E. Temperini, P. Barone, and J. Lorenzana, Theory of superconductivity mediated by Rashba coupling in incipient ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. B 105, 1 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    M. N. Gastiasoro, M. E. Temperini, P. Barone, and J. Lorenzana, Generalized Rashba electron-phonon cou- pling and superconductivity in strontium titanate, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 37 (2023), arXiv:2210.05753

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    M. R. Norman, A. S. Botana, J. Karp, A. Hampel, H. LaBollita, A. J. Millis, G. Fabbris, Y. Shen, and M. P. M. Dean, Orbital polarization, charge transfer, and fluorescence in reduced-valence nickelates, Phys. Rev. B107, 165124 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Venditti, M

    G. Venditti, M. E. Temperini, P. Barone, J. Lorenzana, and M. N. Gastiasoro, Anisotropic Rashba coupling to polar modes in KTaO 3, JPhys Mater.6, 10.1088/2515- 7639/acb017 (2023)

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Venditti, F

    G. Venditti, F. Macheda, P. Barone, J. Lorenzana, and M. N. Gastiasoro, Spin-dependent anisotropic electron- phonon coupling in KTaO 3, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 13087 (2025), arXiv:2510.25655

    2025

  16. [24]

    M. R. Norman, Superconductivity from the Slater mode : Application to KTaO 3 heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 113, 224506 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    K. L. Ngai and E. J. Johnson, Two-phonon deformation potential in InSb, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 1607 (1972)

    1972

  18. [26]

    van der Marel, F

    D. van der Marel, F. Barantani, and C. W. Rischau, Pos- sible mechanism for superconductivity in doped SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 013003 (2019), arXiv:1903.08394

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    D. E. Kiselov and M. V. Feigel’man, Theory of super- conductivity due to Ngai’s mechanism in lightly doped SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. B104, L220506 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    P. A. Volkov, P. Chandra, and P. Coleman, Supercon- ductivity from energy fluctuations in dilute quantum critical polar metals, Nat. Commun.13, 4599 (2022), arXiv:2106.11295

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    S. K. Saha, M. N. Gastiasoro, J. Ruhman, and A. Klein, Strong coupling theory of superconductivity and ferroelec- tric quantum criticality in metallic SrTiO 3, npj Quantum Materials10, 82 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Z. Han, S. A. Kivelson, and P. A. Volkov, Quantum bipo- laron superconductivity from quadratic electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 226001 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Zappacosta, M

    I. Zappacosta, M. Houtput, and J. Tempere, Nonlinear electron-phonon interactions in the migdal-eliashberg the- ory, Phys. Rev. B111, 214525 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Ragni, T

    S. Ragni, T. Hahn, Z. Zhang, N. Prokof’ev, A. Kuklov, S. Klimin, M. Houtput, B. Svistunov, J. Tempere, N. Na- gaosa, C. Franchini, and A. S. Mishchenko, Polaron with quadratic electron-phonon interaction, Phys. Rev. B107, L121109 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996), arXiv:0927- 0256(96)00008 [10.1016]

    1996

  26. [34]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  27. [35]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    Harada, J

    J. Harada, J. D. Axe, and G. Shirane, Determination of the normal vibrational displacements in several per- 17 ovskites by inelastic neutron scattering, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A26, 608 (1970)

    1970

  29. [37]

    Vogt, Hyper-raman tensors of the zone-center optical phonons in SrTiO 3 and KTaO3, Phys

    H. Vogt, Hyper-raman tensors of the zone-center optical phonons in SrTiO 3 and KTaO3, Phys. Rev. B38, 5699 (1988)

    1988

  30. [38]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Improved tetrahedron method for brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B49, 16223 (1994)

    1994

  31. [39]

    B¨ auerle, D

    D. B¨ auerle, D. Wagner, M. W¨ ohlecke, B. Dorner, and H. Kraxenberger, Soft modes in semiconducting SrTiO 3: II. The ferroelectric mode, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Con- densed Matter38, 335 (1980)

    1980

  32. [40]

    J. T. Devreese, S. N. Klimin, J. L. M. Van Mechelen, and D. van der Marel, Many-body large polaron optical conductivity in SrTi1−xNbx O3, Phys. Rev. B81, 125119 (2010), arXiv:1003.1003

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Fauqu´ e, S

    B. Fauqu´ e, S. Jiang, T. Fennell, B. Roessli, A. Ivanov, C. Roux-Byl, B. Baptiste, P. Bourges, K. Behnia, and Y. Tomioka, Doping dependence of the dipolar correlation length scale in metallic SrTiO 3, Nat. Commun.16, 2301 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Sr1−xCaxTiO3 : An XY Quantum Ferroelectric with Transition to Randomness, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 2289 (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    La Sapienza

    C. Muzzi, Superconductivity mediated by quadratic soft phonons in SrTiO3 (Master thesis. University of Rome “La Sapienza”. 2020/2021)

    2020

  36. [44]

    M. N. Gastiasoro, T. V. Trevisan, and R. M. Fernandes, Anisotropic superconductivity mediated by ferroelectric fluctuations in cubic systems with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B101, 174501 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Bardeen and D

    J. Bardeen and D. Pines, Electron-phonon interaction in metals, Phys. Rev.99, 1140 (1955)

    1955

  38. [46]

    P. B. Allen and B. Mitrovi´ c, Theory of superconducting TC (Academic Press, 1983) pp. 1–92

    1983

  39. [47]

    Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory: A short review, Annals of Physics417, 168102 (2020)

    F. Marsiglio, Eliashberg theory: A short review, Annals of Physics417, 168102 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Shirane and Y

    G. Shirane and Y. Yamada, Lattice-dynamical study of the 110◦K phase transition in SrTiO 3, Physical Review 177, 858 (1969)

    1969

  41. [49]

    X. Lin, G. Bridoux, A. Gourgout, G. Seyfarth, S. Kr¨ amer, M. Nardone, B. Fauqu´ e, and K. Behnia, Critical dop- ing for the onset of a two-band superconducting ground state in SrTiO 3−δ, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 207002 (2014), arXiv:1401.4278

    2014 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Pietronero, S

    L. Pietronero, S. Str¨ assler, and C. Grimaldi, Nonadiabatic superconductivity. I. Vertex corrections for the electron- phonon interactions, Phys. Rev. B52, 10516 (1995)

    1995

  43. [51]

    Grimaldi, L

    C. Grimaldi, L. Pietronero, and S. Str¨ assler, Nonadiabatic superconductivity. II. Generalized Eliashberg equations beyond Migdal’s theorem, Phys. Rev. B52, 10530 (1995)

    1995

  44. [52]

    Cappelluti, S

    E. Cappelluti, S. Ciuchi, C. Grimaldi, L. Pietronero, and S. Str¨ assler, HighTc Superconductivity in MgB2 by Nona- diabatic Pairing, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 117003 (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    Schrodi, P

    F. Schrodi, P. M. Oppeneer, and A. Aperis, Full- bandwidth Eliashberg theory of superconductivity be- yond Migdal’s approximation, Phys. Rev. B102, 024503 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    McCalla, M

    E. McCalla, M. N. Gastiasoro, G. Cassuto, R. M. Fernan- des, and C. Leighton, Low-temperature specific heat of doped SrTiO 3: Doping dependence of the effective mass and Kadowaki-Woods scaling violation, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 022001(R) (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Verdi, L

    C. Verdi, L. Ranalli, C. Franchini, and G. Kresse, Quan- tum paraelectricity and structural phase transitions in strontium titanate beyond density functional theory, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, L030801 (2023), arXiv:2211.09616

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Esswein and N

    T. Esswein and N. Spaldin, First-principles calculation of electron-phonon coupling in doped KTaO 3, Open Re- search Europe3, 177 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    H. J. Lee, M. Lee, K. Lee, J. Jo, H. Yang, Y. Kim, S. C. Chae, U. Waghmare, and J. H. Lee, Scale-free ferroelectricity induced by flat phonon bands in HfO2, Science (80-. ).369, 1343 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Qi and K

    Y. Qi and K. M. Rabe, Competing Phases of HfO2 from Unstable Flat Phonon Bands of an Unconventional High- Symmetry Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 46101 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Duan and S

    X. Duan and S. Liu, Emergent superconductivity in doped ferroelectric hafnia, Phys. Rev. B108, 1 (2023), arXiv:2306.02008

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    R. P. Hermann, R. Jin, W. Schweika, F. Grandjean, D. Mandrus, B. C. Sales, and G. J. Long, Einstein oscilla- tors in thallium filled antimony skutterudites, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 88 (2003)

    2003

  53. [61]

    M. B. Maple, Z. Henkie, R. E. Baumbach, T. A. Sayles, N. P. Butch, T. Yanagisawa, W. M. Yuhasz, R. Wawryk, T. Cichorek, and A. Pietraszko, Correlated electron phe- nomena in Ce- and Pr-based filled skutterudite arsenides and antimonides, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Suppl. A77, 7 (2008)

    2008

  54. [62]

    Mizukami, M

    Y. Mizukami, M. Ko´ nczykowski, O. Tanaka, J. Juraszek, Z. Henkie, T. Cichorek, and T. Shibauchi, Suppression of anharmonic phonons and s-wave superconductivity by defects in the filled skutterudite LaRu 4As12, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043428 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Sundaramoorthy, B

    M. Sundaramoorthy, B. Joseph, G. Lingannan, P. Kumar Mondal, C. Nung Kuo, C. Shan Lue, and S. Arumugam, Pressure Effects on Superconducting Quasiskutterudite Sr3Rh4Sn13 Compared to the Ambient Pressure Proper- ties of Ca 3Rh4Sn13 and La3Rh4Sn13 Compounds, Phys. Status Solidi -...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.