pith. sign in

arxiv: 1811.01212 · v1 · pith:BA6U7RJInew · submitted 2018-11-03 · 🧮 math.ST · stat.TH

The distribution of the Lasso: Uniform control over sparse balls and adaptive parameter tuning

classification 🧮 math.ST stat.TH
keywords thetalassogaussianparameterparametersregularizationallowsballs
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The Lasso is a popular regression method for high-dimensional problems in which the number of parameters $\theta_1,\dots,\theta_N$, is larger than the number $n$ of samples: $N>n$. A useful heuristics relates the statistical properties of the Lasso estimator to that of a simple soft-thresholding denoiser,in a denoising problem in which the parameters $(\theta_i)_{i\le N}$ are observed in Gaussian noise, with a carefully tuned variance. Earlier work confirmed this picture in the limit $n,N\to\infty$, pointwise in the parameters $\theta$, and in the value of the regularization parameter. Here, we consider a standard random design model and prove exponential concentration of its empirical distribution around the prediction provided by the Gaussian denoising model. Crucially, our results are uniform with respect to $\theta$ belonging to $\ell_q$ balls, $q\in [0,1]$, and with respect to the regularization parameter. This allows to derive sharp results for the performances of various data-driven procedures to tune the regularization. Our proofs make use of Gaussian comparison inequalities, and in particular of a version of Gordon's minimax theorem developed by Thrampoulidis, Oymak, and Hassibi, which controls the optimum value of the Lasso optimization problem. Crucially, we prove a stability property of the minimizer in Wasserstein distance, that allows to characterize properties of the minimizer itself.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Does $\ell_2$-Boosting Overfit Benignly? High-Dimensional Risk Asymptotics and the $\ell_1$ Implicit Bias

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ℓ₂-Boosting exhibits benign overfitting with logarithmic excess variance decay Θ(σ²/log(p/n)) under isotropic noise due to ℓ₁ bias, and a subdifferential early stopping rule recovers minimax-optimal ℓ₁ rates.

  2. When Does $\ell_2$-Boosting Overfit Benignly? High-Dimensional Risk Asymptotics and the $\ell_1$ Implicit Bias

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ℓ₂-boosting localizes noise into sparse sets under isotropic pure-noise models, yielding excess variance Θ(σ²/log(p/n)) instead of linear decay, with a tuning-free early stopping rule attaining minimax ℓ₁ rates.

  3. Approximate separability of symmetrically penalized least squares in high dimensions: characterization and consequences

    math.ST 2019-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Symmetrically penalized least squares with non-separable penalties approximately matches separable penalties in high-dimensional Gaussian models, quantified by finite-sample concentration inequalities, with limited ad...