pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.11286 · v2 · pith:BAFQI3ELnew · submitted 2026-02-11 · 💻 cs.SI · cs.CY

Grok in the Wild: Characterizing the Roles and Uses of Large Language Models on Social Media

classification 💻 cs.SI cs.CY
keywords grokinteractionsrolessociallanguagelargefindmodels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

xAI's large language model, Grok, is called by millions of people each week on the social media platform X. Prior work characterizing how large language models are used has focused on private, one-on-one interactions. Grok's deployment on X represents a major departure from this setting, with interactions occurring in a public social space. In this paper, we systematically sample three months of interaction data to investigate how, when, and to what effect Grok is used on X. At the platform level, we find that Grok responds to 62% of requests, that the majority (51%) are in English, and that engagement is low, with half of Grok's responses receiving 20 or fewer views after 48 hours. We also inductively build a taxonomy of 10 roles that LLMs play in mediating social interactions and use these roles to analyze 41,735 interactions with Grok on X. We find that Grok most often serves as an information provider but, in contrast to LLM use in private one-on-one settings, also takes on roles related to dispute management, such as truth arbiter, advocate, and adversary. Finally, we characterize the population of X users who prompted Grok and find that their self-expressed interests are closely related to the roles the model assumes in the corresponding interactions. Our findings provide an initial quantitative description of human-AI interactions on X, and a broader understanding of the diverse roles that large language models might play in our online social spaces.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. An Experimental Method to Study Opinion Diffusion in Human-AI Hybrid Societies

    cs.SI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Hybrid human-AI networks in 5x5 grids reached lower final polarization than human-only networks after eight rounds of opinion revision on polarizing topics.

  2. Opportunities and Risks of Generative AI through the Health Information Journey

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Authors propose a four-stage framework to analyze opportunities and risks of generative AI across the health information journey from public sources to clinical care.