pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20024 · v1 · pith:BBE22ZFSnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.CY

Journeys of Parents with LGBTQ+ Children: How Trauma and Healing Reshape Identity and (Mis)Informating Practices

Soonho Kwon , Dong Whi Yoo , Koustuv Saha , Shaowen Bardzell , Younah Kang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.CY
keywords LGBTQ+ parentstrauma and healingidentity reconstructionmisinformationinformating practicesQueer HCISouth Korearelational information practices
0
0 comments X

The pith

Parents of LGBTQ+ children in South Korea rebuild their identities through trauma and healing, which turns them into critical assessors and challengers of queer-related misinformation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how parents in South Korea respond after learning their children identify as LGBTQ+. They encounter an initial emotional rupture involving fear, isolation, and disorientation. To manage this distress, parents engage with queer-related information and misinformation as a coping strategy. Through healing and relational listening to queer realities, they reconstruct their identities as supportive parents. This identity shift then alters their informating practices, leading to greater critical evaluation of information, protective strategies against harmful content, and active efforts to challenge misinformation for others.

Core claim

Parents navigate emotional rupture fueled by fear, isolation, and disorientation after learning their children's queer identity, encounter queer-related (mis)information as a way of coping with this emotional toll, and come to listen to queer realities relationally. Through this process, parents reconstruct their identities as supportive parents, which reshapes their informating practices, making them more critical in assessing queer-related (mis)information, developing strategies to protect themselves from harmful narratives, and actively challenging misinformation to support others navigating similar experiences.

What carries the argument

The trauma-healing process that drives identity reconstruction as supportive parents and thereby transforms informating practices.

Load-bearing premise

The emotional rupture, coping through information, and identity reconstruction described by participants reflect a consistent and identifiable process across parents in the South Korean context.

What would settle it

A set of interviews or accounts from South Korean parents of LGBTQ+ children who experienced initial distress but showed no subsequent shift toward critical assessment or active challenging of misinformation would undermine the claimed link between trauma-healing and changed informating practices.

read the original abstract

This study examines how parents of LGBTQ+ individuals in South Korea navigate the emotional rupture fueled by fear, isolation, and disorientation after learning their children's queer identity, encounter queer-related (mis)information as a way of coping with this emotional toll, and come to listen to queer realities relationally. Through this process, we highlight how parents reconstruct their identities as supportive parents, which reshapes their informating practices, making them more critical in assessing queer-related (mis)information, developing strategies to protect themselves from harmful narratives, and actively challenging misinformation to support others navigating similar experiences. This work contributes to CSCW by (1) foregrounding parents of LGBTQ+ individuals, an underrepresented yet critical stakeholder group in Queer HCI; (2) demonstrating how identity reconfiguration following a trauma-healing process could transform information practices; and (3) arguing that addressing misinformation requires attention beyond individual fact-based discerning to account for its relational, cultural, and emotional dimensions. Further, we invite CSCW scholars to reconsider the balance between abstracting and humanizing information, explore future design possibilities for parents of LGBTQ+ children, and reflect on the role of researchers as participants in collective research communities fueled by care.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper claims that parents of LGBTQ+ children in South Korea experience an emotional rupture (fear, isolation, disorientation) upon learning their child's queer identity, cope by engaging with queer-related (mis)information, and through a relational healing process reconstruct their identities as supportive parents. This identity shift then reshapes their informating practices, making them more critical in assessing (mis)information, developing protective strategies, and actively challenging misinformation to support others. The work positions these findings as contributions to CSCW and Queer HCI by foregrounding parents as stakeholders, linking trauma-healing to transformed information practices, and arguing for attention to relational/cultural/emotional dimensions of misinformation beyond individual fact-checking.

Significance. If the central sequence holds, the study would meaningfully extend Queer HCI and CSCW by centering an underrepresented stakeholder group (parents) in high-stigma contexts and by showing how identity reconfiguration can drive changes in information practices. It offers a humanizing lens on misinformation that incorporates emotional and relational factors, with potential design implications for supporting families. The empirical qualitative approach and invitation to reflect on researcher roles in care-based communities are noted strengths, though the evidential basis for generalizability remains to be demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: No details are provided on sample size, recruitment strategy (e.g., through acceptance-oriented networks), interview protocol, or analysis procedures (e.g., thematic coding steps or validation). This directly undermines assessment of whether the reported trauma-healing-identity reconstruction sequence is robustly supported or vulnerable to post-hoc rationalization in retrospective accounts.
  2. [Findings] Findings/Discussion: The central claim that emotional rupture leads to coping via (mis)information, then to identity reconstruction and critical/challenging informating practices, rests on thematic interpretation without safeguards such as member-checking of the specific trajectory, longitudinal follow-up, or independent measures of identity change. In the South Korean high-stigma context, this raises a concrete risk that reported transformations reflect social-desirability bias or interview framing rather than an observed mechanism.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrasing 'listen to queer realities relationally' and '(Mis)Informating Practices' in the title could be clarified for readers unfamiliar with the subfield to better foreground the link between identity shift and specific practice changes.
  2. [Discussion] The contribution statements (1)-(3) in the abstract are clear but could be more tightly tied to concrete examples from the data in the discussion to strengthen the CSCW positioning.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify and strengthen our work in response to the major comments regarding the Methods and Findings sections. We address each point below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: No details are provided on sample size, recruitment strategy (e.g., through acceptance-oriented networks), interview protocol, or analysis procedures (e.g., thematic coding steps or validation). This directly undermines assessment of whether the reported trauma-healing-identity reconstruction sequence is robustly supported or vulnerable to post-hoc rationalization in retrospective accounts.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the original submission omitted critical methodological details, which limits evaluation of the findings. This was an oversight during manuscript preparation. In the revised version, we have expanded the Methods section to fully describe the sample size, recruitment through acceptance-oriented networks and community channels in South Korea, the semi-structured interview protocol, and the reflexive thematic analysis process including coding steps and validation via team debriefing. These additions directly address the concern about assessing the robustness of the reported sequence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Findings] Findings/Discussion: The central claim that emotional rupture leads to coping via (mis)information, then to identity reconstruction and critical/challenging informating practices, rests on thematic interpretation without safeguards such as member-checking of the specific trajectory, longitudinal follow-up, or independent measures of identity change. In the South Korean high-stigma context, this raises a concrete risk that reported transformations reflect social-desirability bias or interview framing rather than an observed mechanism.

    Authors: We acknowledge the inherent limitations of retrospective qualitative accounts and the absence of certain safeguards such as member-checking for the trajectory or independent identity measures. We have added an explicit Limitations section to the revised manuscript that discusses social-desirability bias risks in the high-stigma South Korean context and the interpretive nature of our thematic analysis. We maintain that the consistent patterns across participant narratives provide credible support for the described process, which we now frame more clearly as an interpretive model rather than a strictly causal claim. We disagree that this undermines the core contribution but agree that greater transparency improves the paper. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • We cannot add longitudinal follow-up data or independent measures of identity change, as the original study was designed as a cross-sectional interview project and such data were not collected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical qualitative study with independent interpretive content

full rationale

The paper is a qualitative empirical study that interprets participant narratives from interviews with parents in South Korea. The described sequence of emotional rupture, coping via (mis)information, identity reconstruction, and reshaped informating practices is presented as emerging from thematic analysis of retrospective accounts rather than from any derivation, fitted parameters, equations, or self-citation chains that reduce the result to its own inputs by construction. No mathematical models, predictions, or load-bearing uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks as an interpretive contribution to CSCW and Queer HCI.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a qualitative empirical study based on participant accounts; it introduces no mathematical free parameters, new physical entities, or formal axioms beyond standard assumptions in interpretive social science research.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Self-reported experiences from interviews can validly reveal internal processes of trauma, healing, and identity change.
    The central narrative depends on interpreting participants' accounts as accurate representations of their emotional and identity journeys.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5762 in / 1272 out tokens · 39551 ms · 2026-05-20T03:45:10.400443+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In My Safe Space

    Dane Acena and Guo Freeman. 2021. “In My Safe Space”: Social Support for LGBTQ Users in Social Virtual Reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Yokohama, Japan)(CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 301, 6 pages. doi:10.1145/3411763.3451673

    work page doi:10.1145/3411763.3451673 2021

  2. [2]

    Matt Adams. 2021. Clubhouse Becomes An Emotional Meeting Place For Israelis And Palestinians.NPR(22 May 2021). https://www.npr.org/2021/05/22/999302007/clubhouse-becomes-an-emotional-meeting-place-for-israelis- and-palestinians Accessed: 2025-05-06

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Zhila Aghajari, Eric PS Baumer, and Dominic DiFranzo. 2023. Reviewing interventions to address misinformation: the need to expand our vision beyond an individualistic focus.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction7, CSCW1 (2023), 1–34

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Jennifer Allen, Cameron Martel, and David G Rand. 2022. Birds of a feather don’t fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter’s Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking program. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New Orleans, LA, USA)(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New Yo...

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3502040 2022

  5. [5]

    Tawfiq Ammari, Eunhye Ahn, Astha Lakhankar, and Joyce Y Lee. 2025. Finding Understanding and Support: Navigating Online Communities to Share and Connect at the intersection of Abuse and Foster Care Experiences.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction9, 2 (2025), 1–40

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Credo Association. [n. d.]. Case Studies of Homosexuality Treatment. http://credoway.org/52/?q= YToyOntzOjEyOiJrZXl3b3JkX3R5cGUiO3M6MzoiYWxsIjtzOjQ6InBhZ2UiO2k6Njt9&bmode=view&idx=7073567& t=board

    work page

  7. [7]

    Merrill, Kristi E Gamarel, and Oliver L

    Laima Augustaitis, Leland A. Merrill, Kristi E Gamarel, and Oliver L. Haimson. 2021. Online Transgender Health Information Seeking: Facilitators, Barriers, and Future Directions. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Yokohama, Japan)(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 205, 14 ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3411764.3445091 2021

  8. [8]

    Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. The user reconfigured: on subjectivities of information. InProceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives. 133–144

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Atlanta, Georgia, USA)(CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1301–1310. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753521

    work page doi:10.1145/1753326.1753521 2010

  10. [10]

    2020.It’s Torture, Not Therapy: A Global Overview of Conversion Therapy: Practices, Perpetrators, and The Role of States: Thematic Report 2020

    Josina Bothe. 2020.It’s Torture, Not Therapy: A Global Overview of Conversion Therapy: Practices, Perpetrators, and The Role of States: Thematic Report 2020. International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims IRCT

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    2021.Thematic analysis: A practical guide

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021.Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 10, No. 6, Article CSCW110. Publication date: October 2026. CSCW110:24 Kwon et al

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Lauren Valentino Bryant. 2020. The YouTube algorithm and the alt-right filter bubble.Open Information Science4, 1 (2020), 85–90

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    We’re Not in That Circle of Misinformation

    Amy Z Chen, Chaeeun Park, Asantewaa Darkwa, Rhonda C Holliday, and Michael L Best. 2024. " We’re Not in That Circle of Misinformation": Understanding Community-Based Trusted Messengers Through Cultural Code-Switching. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction8, CSCW1 (2024), 1–36

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Guangyu Chen, Paolo Ciuccarelli, and Sara Colombo. 2022. VisualBubble: Exploring How Reflection-Oriented User Experiences Affect Users’ Awareness of Their Exposure to Misinformation on Social Media. InExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New Orleans, LA, USA)(CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3491101.3519615 2022

  15. [15]

    Janet X Chen, Allison McDonald, Yixin Zou, Emily Tseng, Kevin A Roundy, Acar Tamersoy, Florian Schaub, Thomas Ristenpart, and Nicola Dell. 2022. Trauma-informed computing: Towards safer technology experiences for all. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–20

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Alpha Exploration Co. 2020. Clubhouse. https://www.joinclubhouse.com

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Ned Cooper, Tiffanie Horne, Gillian R Hayes, Courtney Heldreth, Michal Lahav, Jess Holbrook, and Lauren Wilcox

    work page

  18. [18]

    In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    A systematic review and thematic analysis of community-collaborative approaches to computing research. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    2017.Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches

    John W Creswell and J David Creswell. 2017.Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Michael Ann DeVito, Caitlin Lustig, Ellen Simpson, Kimberley Allison, Tee Chuanromanee, Katta Spiel, Amy Ko, Jennifer Rode, Brianna Dym, Michael Muller, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Ashley Marie Walker, Jed Brubaker, and Alex Ahmed. 2021. Queer in HCI: Strengthening the Community of LGBTQIA+ Researchers and Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conf...

    work page doi:10.1145/3411763.3450403 2021

  21. [21]

    Vargo, Simon Knight, and Stephan Lewandowsky

    Tilman Dingler, Benjamin Tag, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Andrew W. Vargo, Simon Knight, and Stephan Lewandowsky

    work page

  22. [22]

    InExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Yokohama, Japan)(CHI EA ’21)

    Workshop on Technologies to Support Critical Thinking in an Age of Misinformation. InExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Yokohama, Japan)(CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 105, 5 pages. doi:10.1145/3411763.3441350

    work page doi:10.1145/3411763.3441350 2021

  23. [23]

    Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for design. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. 541–550

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Alexandros Efstratiou and Emiliano De Cristofaro. 2022. Adherence to misinformation on social media through socio-cognitive and group-based processes.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–35

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Mingkun Gao, Ziang Xiao, Karrie Karahalios, and Wai-Tat Fu. 2018. To Label or Not to Label: The Effect of Stance and Credibility Labels on Readers’ Selection and Perception of News Articles.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.2, CSCW, Article 55 (nov 2018), 16 pages. doi:10.1145/3274324

    work page doi:10.1145/3274324 2018

  26. [26]

    Robert Garofalo. 2023. Editor’s Statement: Using Misinformation to Harm LGBTQ People Is Not New. 300–301 pages

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Won Pyong Gill and Daeun Seo. 2020. Homosexuality is a Cause of Diseases - Homosexual Acts Are the Main Cause of AIDS... Helping People Quit Homosexuality is True Love. http://www.gbnnewss.com/news/articleView.html? idxno=6973

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    1993.In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development

    Carol Gilligan. 1993.In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard university press

    work page 1993

  29. [29]

    Carol Gilligan. 2014. Moral injury and the ethic of care: Reframing the conversation about differences.Journal of social philosophy45, 1 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Andrea Grimes and Richard Harper. 2008. Celebratory technology: new directions for food research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 467–476

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Arnold H Grossman, Jung Yeon Park, John A Frank, and Stephen T Russell. 2021. Parental responses to transgender and gender nonconforming youth: Associations with parent support, parental abuse, and youths’ psychological adjustment.Journal of Homosexuality68, 8 (2021), 1260–1277

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Ann P Haas, Mickey Eliason, Vickie M Mays, Robin M Mathy, Susan D Cochran, Anthony R D’Augelli, Morton M Silverman, Prudence W Fisher, Tonda Hughes, Margaret Rosario, et al. 2010. Suicide and suicide risk in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: Review and recommendations.Journal of homosexuality58, 1 (2010), 10–51

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    Iksang Han and Kyungsik Choi. 2024. Sex Reassignment Surgery Leads to Lifelong Suffering... Suicide Rate is 22 Times Higher. https://www.kmib.co.kr/article/view.asp?arcid=0924339708

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Md Mahfuzul Haque, Mohammad Yousuf, Ahmed Shatil Alam, Pratyasha Saha, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Naeemul Hassan. 2020. Combating misinformation in Bangladesh: Roles and responsibilities as perceived by journalists, fact-checkers, and users.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4, CSCW2 (2020), 1–32

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 10, No. 6, Article CSCW110. Publication date: October 2026. Journeys of Parents with LGBTQ+ Children CSC...

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Amelia Hassoun, Ian Beacock, Sunny Consolvo, Beth Goldberg, Patrick Gage Kelley, and Daniel M. Russell. 2023. Practicing Information Sensibility: How Gen Z Engages with Online Information. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany)(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Artic...

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581328 2023

  37. [37]

    Gillian R Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)18, 3 (2011), 1–20

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Hendrik Heuer and Elena Leah Glassman. 2022. A Comparative Evaluation of Interventions Against Misinformation: Augmenting the WHO Checklist. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA)(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 241, 21 pages. doi:10.1145/3491102.3517717

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3517717 2022

  39. [39]

    Yuko Homma and Elizabeth M Saewyc. 2007. The emotional well-being of Asian-American sexual minority youth in school.Journal of LGBT Health Research3, 1 (2007), 67–78

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Alexander Hoseason. 2010. The role of borders as sites and progenitors of conflict: A critical analysis.Global Discourse 1, 2 (2010), 166–178

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    Dorothy Howard and Lilly Irani. 2019. Ways of knowing when research subjects care. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Y Linlin Huang, Kate Starbird, Mania Orand, Stephanie A Stanek, and Heather T Pedersen. 2015. Connected through crisis: Emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online. InProceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 969–980

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    2021.Using Social Media in Community-Based Protection

    Anahi Ayala Iacucci. 2021.Using Social Media in Community-Based Protection. UNHCR, Chapter Chapter 6: Rumours and Misinformation

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, Yannis Katsis, Dakuo Wang, Lucian Popa, and Michael Muller. 2023. Exploring the Use of Personalized AI for Identifying Misinformation on Social Media. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany)(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 105, 27 pages. ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581219 2023

  45. [45]

    Zhang, Adam J

    Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand, and David R. Karger

    work page

  46. [46]

    Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social Media. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.5, CSCW1, Article 18 (apr 2021), 42 pages. doi:10.1145/3449092

    work page doi:10.1145/3449092 2021

  47. [47]

    Seong-Jo Jeong, Heeyoung Lee, and Chan S Suh. 2024. Moving Apart, Coming Together: The Formation of an LGBTQ Movement Community in South Korea.Journal of homosexuality(2024), 1–26

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Anne Jonas, Stefani Vargas, and Jean Hardy. 2024. ’Better than Google’: Information Activism for LGBTQ+ Young Adults in a Rural Community.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction8, CSCW2 (2024), 1–29

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Prerna Juneja and Tanushree Mitra. 2022. Human and technological infrastructures of fact-checking.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–36

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Byung Chul Kang and Jihye Kim. 2006. Survey on the Living Conditions of LGBTQ+ Adolescents. (2006)

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    Michael King, Joanna Semlyen, Sharon See Tai, Helen Killaspy, David Osborn, Dmitri Popelyuk, and Irwin Nazareth

    work page

  52. [52]

    BMC psychiatry8 (2008), 1–17

    A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people. BMC psychiatry8 (2008), 1–17

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Jan Kirchner and Christian Reuter. 2020. Countering Fake News: A Comparison of Possible Solutions Regarding User Acceptance and Effectiveness.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.4, CSCW2, Article 140 (oct 2020), 27 pages. doi:10.1145/3415211

    work page doi:10.1145/3415211 2020

  54. [54]

    Homosexuality Treatment Research Shows 79% Average Effectiveness

    Doohyun Ko. 2019. "Homosexuality Treatment Research Shows 79% Average Effectiveness"... Overturning the "Innate" Claim. https://www.kmib.co.kr/article/view.asp?arcid=0924113886

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Gallup Korea. 2023. Gallup Korea Daily Opinion 544. https://www.gallup.co.kr/gallupdb/reportContent.asp?seqNo= 1397

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    2018.Coming Out Story

    PFLAG Korea. 2018.Coming Out Story. Hantijae, Daegu

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Chris Kremidas-Courtney. 2023. Disinformation against LGBTQIA+ people is a threat to democracy. https://www. friendsofeurope.org/insights/disinformation-against-lgbtqia-people-is-a-threat-to-democracy/

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Sini-Petriina Kuusisto. 2023. Government policies fuel South Korea’s HIV epidemic. https://eastasiaforum.org/2018/ 02/17/government-policies-fuel-south-koreas-hiv-epidemic/

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Jeyup S. Kwaak. 2017. One of the world’s largest armies is allegedly using dating apps to out gay soldiers. https: //qz.com/960805/one-of-the-worlds-largest-armies-is-allegedly-using-dating-apps-to-out-gay-soldiers

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    Erick Laurent. 2005. Sexuality and human rights: an Asian perspective.Journal of Homosexuality48, 3-4 (2005), 163–225

    work page 2005

  61. [61]

    Christopher A Le Dantec and Sarah Fox. 2015. Strangers at the gate: Gaining access, building rapport, and co- constructing community-based research. InProceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 10, No. 6, Article CSCW110. Publication date: October 2026. CSCW110:26 Kwon et al. work & soci...

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Heeyoung Lee and Seong-Jo Jeong. 2024. Gender Differences in the Relationship between Coming Out as LGB to Family and Depression in South Korea.Society and Mental Health(2024), 21568693241242400

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Wang, Omar Shaikh, Vibhor Sehgal, Ankit Peshin, and Duen Horng Chau

    Seongmin Lee, Sadia Afroz, Haekyu Park, Zijie J. Wang, Omar Shaikh, Vibhor Sehgal, Ankit Peshin, and Duen Horng Chau. 2022. MisVis: Explaining Web Misinformation Connections via Visual Summary. InExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New Orleans, LA, USA)(CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New Y...

    work page doi:10.1145/3491101.3519711 2022

  64. [64]

    Alex Jiahong Lu, Shruti Sannon, Cameron Moy, Savana Brewer, Jaye Green, Kisha N Jackson, Daivon Reeder, Camaria Wafer, Mark S Ackerman, and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2023. Participatory Noticing through Photovoice: Engaging Arts-and Community-Based Approaches in Design Research. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 2489–2508

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Zhuoran Lu, Patrick Li, Weilong Wang, and Ming Yin. 2022. The Effects of AI-based Credibility Indicators on the Detection and Spread of Misinformation under Social Influence.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.6, CSCW2, Article 461 (nov 2022), 27 pages. doi:10.1145/3555562

    work page doi:10.1145/3555562 2022

  66. [66]

    Rafael Martinez, Chris Geeng, and Damon McCoy. 2025. ’It Would Be a Lot Harder for Them to Change Their Mind.... They Grew Up in Like a Very Different Time and a Very Different Location’: Barriers to Misinformation Corrections in Online Black and Latine Private Spaces.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction9, 2 (2025), 1–26

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    Michael Mitsanas. [n. d.]. South Korea’s LGBTQ community confronts crushing headwinds in fight for Equal- ity. https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/south-koreas-lgbtq-community-confronts-crushing-headwinds- fight-equali-rcna57777#

    work page

  68. [68]

    Dror Moreh. 2012. The Gatekeepers

    work page 2012

  69. [69]

    Belinda L Needham and Erika L Austin. 2010. Sexual orientation, parental support, and health during the transition to young adulthood.Journal of youth and adolescence39 (2010), 1189–1198

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    ABC News. 2021. South Korea’s first known transgender soldier found dead. https://web.archive.org/web/ 20210304003934/https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/south-koreas-transgender-soldier-found-dead- 76226064

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    Nel Noddings. 2013. Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (updated).Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles: University of California Press (Original work published 1984)(2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Hayoun Noh, Salman Muin Kayser Chishti, Hyunah Jo, Nikki Newhouse, Songi Kim, Max Van Kleek, and Younah Kang. 2025. CounselAR: Exploring How AR Filters Facilitate Online Psychotherapy In the Wild With South Korean Young Adults. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    Hayoun Noh, Juhee Go, Sophia Song, Songi Kim, and Younah Kang. 2024. Investigating the Possibility of Using an AR Mask to Support Online Psychological Counseling.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction8, CSCW1 (2024), 1–33

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    Chan-kyong Park. 2024. South Korea’s nominated human rights chief sparks uproar over his anti-LGBTQ stance. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3277198/south-koreas-nominated-human-rights-chief- sparks-uproar-over-his-anti-lgbtq-stance

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Hyojin Park. 2016. Homosexuality is Not Love. They Grow Old Alone and Eventually End Up Miserable: Testimony of Korea’s First Transgender Person Kim Yu-bok on Their Deathbed. https://www.kmib.co.kr/article/view.asp?arcid= 0923601974

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    Seora Park, Tilar A DeVine, and Austin L Toombs. 2025. Stuck in Translation: Reflexive Practice in Queer HCI Research from Non-Western Perspectives. InProceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    The Associated Press. 2017. South Korea Presidential Debate. SouthKoreapresidentialfront-runnersagreegaysshouldn’ tbeinmilitary

    work page 2017

  78. [78]

    If Someone Downvoted My Posts—That’d Be the End of the World

    Casey Randazzo and Tawfiq Ammari. 2023. “If Someone Downvoted My Posts—That’d Be the End of the World”: Designing Safer Online Spaces for Trauma Survivors. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–18

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    Casey Randazzo and Tawfiq Ammari. 2025. Kintsugi-Inspired Design: Communicatively Reconstructing Identities Online After Trauma.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction9, 7 (2025), 1–31

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Casey Randazzo, Carol F Scott, Rosanna Bellini, Tawfiq Ammari, Michael Ann Devito, Bryan Semaan, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2023. Trauma-Informed Design: A Collaborative Approach to Building Safer Online Spaces. InCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 470–475

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.