Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Characterizing Discriminative Patterns

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1102.4104 v1 pith:BBGXIKBJ submitted 2011-02-20 cs.DB cs.ITmath.ITq-bio.GN

classification cs.DBcs.ITmath.ITq-bio.GN
keywords patternsdiscriminativepatterntypesdatasetsdifferentadditivebeyond
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Discriminative patterns are association patterns that occur with disproportionate frequency in some classes versus others, and have been studied under names such as emerging patterns and contrast sets. Such patterns have demonstrated considerable value for classification and subgroup discovery, but a detailed understanding of the types of interactions among items in a discriminative pattern is lacking. To address this issue, we propose to categorize discriminative patterns according to four types of item interaction: (i) driver-passenger, (ii) coherent, (iii) independent additive and (iv) synergistic beyond independent additive. Either of the last three is of practical importance, with the latter two representing a gain in the discriminative power of a pattern over its subsets. Synergistic patterns are most restrictive, but perhaps the most interesting since they capture a cooperative effect. For domains such as genetic research, differentiating among these types of patterns is critical since each yields very different biological interpretations. For general domains, the characterization provides a novel view of the nature of the discriminative patterns in a dataset, which yields insights beyond those provided by current approaches that focus mostly on pattern-based classification and subgroup discovery. This paper presents a comprehensive discussion that defines these four pattern types and investigates their properties and their relationship to one another. In addition, these ideas are explored for a variety of datasets (ten UCI datasets, one gene expression dataset and two genetic-variation datasets). The results demonstrate the existence, characteristics and statistical significance of the different types of patterns. They also illustrate how pattern characterization can provide novel insights into discriminative pattern mining and the discriminative structure of different datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pattern-Based Graph Classification: Comparison of Quality Measures and Importance of Preprocessing

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a benchmark of eight graph datasets, the measures AbsSupDif and Sup rank discriminative subgraphs best, while widely used measures such as GR, Acc, and InfGain perform worse, and footprint-based clustering reduces ...

Pith tools