First-principles Floquet analysis from real-time propagation

Angel Rubio; Benshu Fan; Hannes H\"ubener; Ruipeng Li; Umberto De Giovannini

First-principles Floquet analysis from real-time propagation

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Quasi-energies and Floquet states can be read off directly from the one-period evolution operator built from overlaps of already-propagated wavefunctions.

desk verdict Clean, usable post-processing that turns ordinary real-time TDDFT trajectories into unfolded Floquet bands and sideband symmetries with almost no extra cost. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.04269 v1 pith:BCQMFIMU submitted 2026-07-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ruipeng Li , Benshu Fan , Umberto De Giovannini , Hannes Hübener , Angel Rubio This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords Floquettheoryreal-timeTDDFTquasi-energybandunfoldinglight-drivenmaterialsone-periodevolutionoperatorsidebandsymmetry

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that Floquet quasi-energies and states need not be obtained by building and diagonalizing an enlarged Floquet Hamiltonian. Instead, the one-period time-evolution operator is reconstructed solely from the overlaps of the orbitals that a real-time TDDFT calculation already produces. Diagonalizing that modest matrix yields the quasi-energies and the periodic Floquet states inside the propagated subspace. An unfolding weight equal to the norm of the appropriately shifted zeroth harmonic then restores the equilibrium band character outside the reduced Floquet zone, so that gaps, replicas and hybridizations become visible. The same reconstructed states also carry the real-space symmetry of individual light-induced sidebands. Because the analysis works for any starting time and even for finite pulses that are only approximately periodic, the method turns ordinary time-propagation runs into a practical source of Floquet observables for real materials.

What carries the argument

The one-period evolution matrix U_ij(t+T,t)=⟨ψ_i(t)|ψ_j(t+T)⟩ whose eigenvalues give the quasi-energies and whose eigenvectors, after Fourier decomposition and gauge shift, supply both the unfolding weights and the real-space sideband wavefunctions.

What would settle it

Apply the method and an independent Floquet-Hamiltonian diagonalization to the same continuous-wave drive on graphene or monolayer BP; any systematic mismatch in quasi-energies, unfolded weights or sideband symmetries would refute the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Floquet quasi-energies and Floquet states of a driven solid can be extracted, with negligible extra cost, by reconstructing the one-period evolution operator from the overlaps of already-propagated Kohn–Sham orbitals and then unfolding the spectrum with the gauge-corrected zeroth-harmonic weight of each eigenstate.

Load-bearing premise

The finite set of already-propagated orbitals is assumed to span a subspace large enough that diagonalizing the evolution operator inside it recovers the physically relevant Floquet states without needing the full enlarged Hilbert space.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any existing real-time TDDFT run can be post-processed into Floquet band structures and sideband symmetries at almost no extra cost.
Floquet-like spectra remain meaningful for finite pulses provided the analysis window is a single optical cycle, allowing transient light-dressed bands to be tracked cycle by cycle.
Real-space Floquet wavefunctions obtained this way give direct access to optical selection rules and polarization-dependent hybridization without separate symmetry analysis.
The same machinery extends immediately from 2D monolayers to fully periodic 3D bulk crystals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Multi-cycle evolution operators constructed the same way could quantify how Floquet quasiparticles form, persist and decay during a realistic pump pulse.
Because the method never leaves the ordinary electronic Hilbert space, it is a natural candidate for adding electron–phonon or weak-correlation effects that are hard to include in an enlarged Floquet Hamiltonian.
The unfolding weight itself could be used as a diagnostic of adiabaticity: states whose zeroth-harmonic weight collapses are those most strongly hybridized by the drive.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a practical methods paper that does exactly what the title claims. The core move is standard Floquet theory: reconstruct the one-period evolution operator from orbital overlaps already available in a real-time run, diagonalize it, and get quasi-energies plus the periodic Floquet states. What they add is the systematic first-principles implementation, the harmonic-weight unfolding that restores equilibrium band character outside the reduced zone (with the gauge shift spelled out cleanly in Appendix A), and the demonstration that the same machinery still produces sensible spectra under finite pulses.

They show it works on four systems that cover the usual cases people care about: graphene gap opening under circular drive, black-phosphorus sideband symmetries and selection rules, valley-selective renormalization in pulsed hBN, and polarization anisotropy in bulk SnS. The figures are readable once the weights are applied; without them the reduced-zone spectra are the usual mess. Overhead is negligible, the derivation is short and correct, and the numerical parameters plus the Octopus engine are public enough that re-implementation is feasible.

Soft spots are minor and already visible. The method lives inside the subspace spanned by the propagated KS orbitals; that is exact by construction for any invariant subspace, and the paper never claims more. In the weakly driven or adiabatic regimes they target, the occupied manifold is essentially closed, so the quasi-energies and zeroth-harmonic weights come out right. The finite-pulse analysis is an effective windowed procedure rather than a theorem; they present it that way. Data and analysis scripts are not fully open, but that is a secondary issue for a methods paper whose algorithm is fully specified.

This is for people who already run real-time TDDFT on driven solids and want Floquet observables without building the enlarged Hamiltonian. It will change day-to-day analysis practice more than it will rewrite theory. I would send it to referees without hesitation and would cite the method when I need the same post-processing.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a real-time Floquet analysis that reconstructs the one-period evolution operator from overlaps of already-propagated Kohn–Sham orbitals (Eqs. 4–7), diagonalizes it inside that subspace to obtain quasi-energies and Floquet states, and unfolds the reduced Floquet Brillouin zone by weighting each branch with the norm of the appropriately gauge-shifted zeroth harmonic (Eq. 8 and Appendix A). The same reconstructed states yield real-space sideband symmetries. The method is demonstrated on four first-principles TDDFT cases—graphene (topological gap), monolayer black phosphorus (glide-mirror selection rules), pulsed hBN (valley-selective renormalization), and bulk SnS (polarization-dependent hybridization)—including finite pulses that lack strict periodicity.

Significance. If the procedure is adopted, it removes the principal practical barrier that has kept Floquet analysis of realistic materials largely confined to model Hamiltonians or post-processed Floquet matrices. The algorithmic core is standard Floquet theory applied to the evolution operator, the gauge-redundancy argument for unfolding is carefully stated, and the four independent material demonstrations reproduce known physical expectations (gap opening, optical selection rules, valley dichroism) without free parameters. The finite-pulse extension, while heuristic, is already the regime of current pump–probe experiments. The approach therefore supplies a lightweight, immediately usable bridge between real-time TDDFT and Floquet observables.

minor comments (4)

Sec. II.C and Eq. (13): a short remark on the sampling rate required for the discrete Fourier transform of the stored orbitals would help practitioners avoid aliasing of higher harmonics.
Fig. 1 caption and grayscale scale bar: the intensity scale is not numerically labeled; adding a brief note that darker means larger w_α would improve readability.
Appendix B: the peak field strengths and intensities are given in mixed units (MV/cm and W/cm^{2}); converting all to a single convention would aid reproducibility.
A brief statement clarifying that the method recovers exact Floquet eigenstates only inside the invariant subspace spanned by the propagated orbitals (already implicit in Eqs. 4–7) would forestall over-interpretation outside the occupied manifold.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the method is a direct, self-contained reformulation of standard Floquet theory applied to already-propagated orbitals, with independent numerical checks against known physical features.

full rationale

The central construction (Sec. II.A–B, Eqs. 4–7) reconstructs the one-period evolution operator matrix elements as ordinary overlaps ⟨ψ_i(t)|ψ_j(t+T)⟩ of the time-evolved Kohn–Sham states already produced by any real-time propagator; diagonalization then yields quasi-energies and Floquet eigenvectors inside that subspace by the textbook definition of Floquet theory. The subsequent unfolding weight (Sec. II.C, Eq. 8 and Appendix A) is likewise the norm of the gauge-shifted zeroth harmonic component, again by definition of the Floquet Fourier expansion and its gauge redundancy; it is not fitted to any target spectrum. All four material demonstrations (graphene gap, BP sideband symmetries, hBN valley dichroism under finite pulses, SnS polarization selectivity) are compared to independent, previously established physical expectations (topological gap opening, optical selection rules, C3 angular-momentum conservation) that are not parameters of the method. Self-citations supply only background context on Floquet engineering and the Octopus code; none supply a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the numerical results. The finite-pulse extension is explicitly presented as an effective windowed analysis rather than a rigorous theorem, so no circular claim is made. The derivation chain therefore contains no self-definitional loop, no fitted-input-as-prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard Floquet theory, the adiabatic TDDFT approximation, and the assumption that the propagated KS subspace is sufficient; no free parameters are fitted to produce the claimed spectra, and no new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)

standard math Floquet theorem: solutions of a T-periodic Hamiltonian are of the form e^{-i E_α t} |ϕ_α(t)> with |ϕ_α(t+T)> = |ϕ_α(t)>
Invoked throughout Sec. II.A as the starting point for the evolution-operator formulation.
domain assumption Time-dependent Kohn-Sham orbitals obtained from real-time TDDFT furnish a sufficiently complete basis for the physically relevant Floquet subspace
Implicit in the construction of the overlap matrix (Eq. 7) and never independently verified against a full Floquet-Hamiltonian diagonalization.
domain assumption Local-density approximation and norm-conserving pseudopotentials adequately describe the equilibrium and driven electronic structure of the four materials studied
Standard computational choice stated in Appendix B; results inherit the usual LDA band-gap errors.
ad hoc to paper For a finite pulse the instantaneous one-period overlap matrix still yields meaningful transient Floquet quasi-energies provided the envelope varies slowly on the scale of T
Stated in Sec. III.C without a rigorous error bound; the method is applied heuristically to three successive windows inside a 9-cycle pulse.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First-principles Floquet analysis from real-time propagation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BCQMFIMU

@misc{pith2026260704269,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First-principles Floquet analysis from real-time propagation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BCQMFIMU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.04269}
}

read the original abstract

We present a real-time Floquet analysis method for extracting quasi-energies and Floquet states directly from propagated wavefunctions. By reconstructing the one-period evolution operator from overlaps between time-evolved states, the method avoids the explicit construction of the enlarged Floquet Hamiltonian and adds negligible computational overhead to time-dependent simulations. To resolve the ambiguity inherent in the reduced-zone representation, we introduce an unfolding procedure based on the harmonic decomposition of Floquet states, which recovers their underlying equilibrium band character beyond the reduced Floquet Brillouin zone. The reconstructed wavefunctions further provide access to the symmetry properties of individual light-induced sidebands. We demonstrate the applicability and generality of the method in first-principles time-dependent simulations of real materials, ranging from two-dimensional monolayers to a three-dimensional bulk semiconductor, and including finite pulses without strict time periodicity. This framework directly connects real-time simulations with Floquet observables, enabling practical analysis of light-driven electronic structure in materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04269 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (a) Equilibrium band structure of monolayer BP and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. (a) Floquet band structure obtained from an analysis window taken within the second cycle of the pump, with starting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Grayscale Floquet band structure of bulk SnS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic illustration of the Floquet gauge redun [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Symmetry Rules for Cavity Materials Engineering with Linearly Polarized Vacuum Fields
cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In a dark cavity with linear polarization, the effective electron-photon coupling is quadratic in momentum, so each point group reduces to the subgroup preserving the polarization axis; the paper classifies this for a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Hsieh, D

D. Hsieh, D. N. Basov, and R. D. Averitt, Towards prop- erties on demand in quantum materials, Nat. Mater.16, 1077 (2017)

2017
[2]

de la Torre, D

A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

2021
[3]

Bloch, A

J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Ru- bio, Strongly correlated electron–photon systems, Nature 606, 41 (2022)

2022
[4]

C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 33 (2022)

2022
[5]

Sambe, Steady States and Quasienergies of a Quantum-Mechanical System in an Oscillating Field, Phys

H. Sambe, Steady States and Quasienergies of a Quantum-Mechanical System in an Oscillating Field, Phys. Rev. A7, 2203 (1973)

1973
[6]

Oka and S

T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 387 (2019)

2019
[7]

Aeschlimann, S

S. Aeschlimann, S. A. Sato, R. Krause, M. Chavez- Cervantes, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, S. Forti, C. Coletti, K. Hanff, K. Rossnagel, A. Rubio, and I. Gierz, Survival of Floquet-Bloch states in the presence of scattering, Nano Lett.21, 5028 (2021)

2021
[8]

Merboldt, M

M. Merboldt, M. Sch¨ uler, D. Schmitt, J. P. Bange, W. Bennecke, K. Gadge, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, D. Momeni, D. Steil,et al., Observation of Floquet states in graphene, Nat. Phys.21, 1093 (2025)

2025

Show all 59 references

[9]

D. Choi, M. Mogi, U. De Giovannini, D. Azoury, B. Lv, Y. Su, H. H¨ ubener, A. Rubio, and N. Gedik, Observa- tion of Floquet–Bloch states in monolayer graphene, Nat. Phys.21, 1100 (2025)

2025
[10]

De Giovannini, H

U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, Monitoring electron-photon dressing in WSe 2, Nano Lett.16, 7993 (2016)

2016
[11]

Claassen, C

M. Claassen, C. Jia, B. Moritz, and T. P. Dev- ereaux, All-optical materials design of chiral edge modes in transition-metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Commun.7, 13074 (2016)

2016
[12]

Neufeld, W

O. Neufeld, W. Mao, H. H¨ ubener, N. Tancogne-Dejean, S. A. Sato, U. De Giovannini, and A. Rubio, Time- and angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy of strong-field light-dressed solids: Prevalence of the adiabatic band pic- ture, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033101 (2022)

2022
[13]

S. Zhou, C. Bao, B. Fan, H. Zhou, Q. Gao, H. Zhong, T. Lin, H. Liu, P. Yu, P. Tang,et al., Pseudospin-selective Floquet band engineering in black phosphorus, Nature 614, 75 (2023)

2023
[14]

S. Zhou, C. Bao, B. Fan, F. Wang, H. Zhong, H. Zhang, P. Tang, W. Duan, and S. Zhou, Floquet engineering of black phosphorus upon below-gap pumping, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 116401 (2023)

2023
[15]

C. Bao, F. Wang, H. Zhong, S. Zhou, T. Lin, H. Zhang, X. Cai, W. Duan, and S. Zhou, Light-induced ultra- fast glide-mirror symmetry breaking in black phosphorus, ACS nano18, 32038 (2024)

2024
[16]

F. Wang, X. Cai, X. Tang, J. Lu, W. Chen, T. Sheng, R. Feng, H. Zhong, H. Zhang, P. Yu,et al., Observation of Floquet-induced gap in graphene, Nat. Mater.25, 1140 (2026)

2026
[17]

Oka and H

T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406 (2009)

2009
[18]

N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Floquet topo- logical insulator in semiconductor quantum wells, Nat. Phys.7, 490 (2011)

2011
[19]

Kitagawa, T

T. Kitagawa, T. Oka, A. Brataas, L. Fu, and E. Demler, Transport properties of nonequilibrium systems under the application of light: Photoinduced quantum Hall in- sulators without Landau levels, Phys. Rev. B84, 235108 (2011)

2011
[20]

Y. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

2013
[21]

Sentef, M

M. Sentef, M. Claassen, A. Kemper, B. Moritz, T. Oka, 11 J. Freericks, and T. Devereaux, Theory of Floquet band formation and local pseudospin textures in pump- probe photoemission of graphene, Nat. Commun.6, 7047 (2015)

2015
[22]

E. J. Sie, J. W. McIver, Y.-H. Lee, L. Fu, J. Kong, and N. Gedik, Valley-selective optical Stark effect in mono- layer WS2, Nat. Mater.14, 290 (2015)

2015
[23]

Mahmood, C.-K

F. Mahmood, C.-K. Chan, Z. Alpichshev, D. Gardner, Y. Lee, P. A. Lee, and N. Gedik, Selective scattering between Floquet-Bloch and Volkov states in a topological insulator, Nat. Phys.12, 306 (2016)

2016
[24]

C.-K. Chan, P. A. Lee, K. S. Burch, J. H. Han, and Y. Ran, When chiral photons meet chiral fermions: pho- toinduced anomalous Hall effects in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 026805 (2016)

2016
[25]

H¨ ubener, M

H. H¨ ubener, M. A. Sentef, U. De Giovannini, A. F. Kemper, and A. Rubio, Creating stable Floquet-Weyl semimetals by laser-driving of 3D Dirac materials, Nat. Commun.8, 13940 (2017)

2017
[26]

E. J. Sie, C. H. Lui, Y.-H. Lee, L. Fu, J. Kong, and N. Gedik, Large, valley-exclusive Bloch-Siegert shift in monolayer WS2, Science355, 1066 (2017)

2017
[27]

S. A. Sato, J. W. McIver, M. Nuske, P. Tang, G. Jotzu, B. Schulte, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, L. Mathey, M. A. Sentef, A. Cavalleri, and A. Rubio, Microscopic theory for the light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 214302 (2019)

2019
[28]

M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topo- logical insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 229 (2020)

2020
[29]

Sch¨ uler, U

M. Sch¨ uler, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, A. Rubio, M. A. Sentef, T. P. Devereaux, and P. Werner, How cir- cular dichroism in time-and angle-resolved photoemission can be used to spectroscopically detect transient topolog- ical states in graphene, Phys. Rev. X10, 041013 (2020)

2020
[30]

J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F. U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Nat. Phys.16, 38 (2020)

2020
[31]

S. Ito, M. Sch¨ uler, M. Meierhofer, S. Schlauderer, J. Freudenstein, J. Reimann, D. Afanasiev, K. Kokh, O. Tereshchenko, J. G¨ udde,et al., Build-up and dephas- ing of Floquet–Bloch bands on subcycle timescales, Na- ture616, 696 (2023)

2023
[32]

X. Liu, B. Fan, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, W. Duan, A. Rubio, and P. Tang, Floquet engineering of magnetism in topological insulator thin films, Electron. Struct.5, 024002 (2023)

2023
[33]

T. Zhu, H. Wang, and H. Zhang, Floquet engineering of magnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4 films, Phys. Rev. B107, 085151 (2023)

2023
[34]

B. Fan, W. Duan, A. Rubio, and P. Tang, Chiral Floquet engineering on topological fermions in chiral crystals, npj Quantum Mater.9, 101 (2024)

2024
[35]

Neufeld, H

O. Neufeld, H. H¨ ubener, U. D. Giovannini, and A. Ru- bio, Tracking electron motion within and outside of Flo- quet bands from attosecond pulse trains in time-resolved ARPES, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter36, 225401 (2024)

2024
[36]

F. Zhan, R. Chen, Z. Ning, D.-S. Ma, Z. Wang, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Perspective: Floquet engineering topolog- ical states from effective models towards realistic mate- rials, Quantum Front.3, 21 (2024)

2024
[37]

Z. Li, H. Cao, and S. Meng, Light-induced above-room- temperature Chern insulators in group-IV Xenes, npj Comput. Mater.11, 160 (2025)

2025
[38]

Fragkos, B

S. Fragkos, B. Fabre, O. Tkach, S. Petit, D. Descamps, G. Sch¨ onhense, Y. Mairesse, M. Sch¨ uler, and S. Beaulieu, Floquet-Bloch valleytronics, Nat. Commun.16, 5799 (2025)

2025
[39]

Caruso, M

F. Caruso, M. A. Sentef, C. Attaccalite, M. Bonitz, C. Draxl, U. De Giovannini, M. Eckstein, R. Ernstor- fer, M. Fechner, M. Gr¨ uning,et al., The 2025 roadmap to ultrafast dynamics: frontiers of theoretical and com- putational modeling, J. Phys. Mater.9, 012501 (2025)

2025
[40]

U. D. Giovannini and H. H¨ ubener, Floquet analysis of ex- citations in materials, J. Phys. Mater.3, 012001 (2019)

2019
[41]

Y.-H. Chan, D. Y. Qiu, F. H. da Jornada, and S. G. Louie, Giant self-driven exciton-Floquet signatures in time-resolved photoemission spectroscopy of MoS 2 from time-dependent GW approach, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2301957120 (2023)

2023
[42]

T. Xiao, T. Huang, C. Bao, and Z. Sun, Interaction effects on electronic floquet spectra: Excitonic effects, Phys. Rev. B112, L161106 (2025)

2025
[43]

Pareek, D

V. Pareek, D. R. Bacon, X. Zhu, Y.-H. Chan, F. Bus- solotti, M. G. Menezes, N. S. Chan, J. P. Urquizo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Driving Floquet physics with excitonic fields, Nat. Phys.22, 209 (2026)

2026
[44]

Both states differ up to a complex phase and hence its a matter of choice which states are used

We note that the full Floquet states are also eigenstates of the one-period time evolution operator with the same eigenvalues. Both states differ up to a complex phase and hence its a matter of choice which states are used
[45]

X. Cai, C. Bao, B. Fan, H. Zhong, F. Wang, S. Zhou, T. Lin, H. Zhang, P. Yu, P. Tang, W. Duan, and S. Zhou, Occupation dynamics of Floquet–Volkov states and spec- tral sum rule, Nano Lett.26, 7034 (2026)

2026
[46]

F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect with- out Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

2015
[47]

S. W. Jung, S. H. Ryu, W. J. Shin, Y. Sohn, M. Huh, R. J. Koch, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, A. Bostwick, and K. S. Kim, Black phosphorus as a bipolar pseudospin semiconductor, Nat. Mater.19, 277 (2020)

2020
[48]

C. Bao, M. Sch¨ uler, T. Xiao, F. Wang, H. Zhong, T. Lin, X. Cai, T. Sheng, X. Tang, H. Zhang, P. Yu, Z. Sun, W. Duan, and S. Zhou, Manipulating the symmetry of photon-dressed electronic states, Nat. Commun.15, 10535 (2024)

2024
[49]

B. Fan, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, S. Zhou, W. Duan, A. Rubio, and P. Tang, Floquet optical selec- tion rules in black phosphorus, Sci. Adv.11, eadw2744 (2025)

2025
[50]

C. Bao, H. Zhong, B. Fan, X. Cai, F. Wang, S. Zhou, T. Lin, H. Zhang, P. Yu, P. Tang,et al., Floquet- Volkov interference in a semiconductor, Phys. Rev. B 111, L081106 (2025)

2025
[51]

T. Cao, G. Wang, W. Han, H. Ye, C. Zhu, J. Shi, Q. Niu, P. Tan, E. Wang, B. Liu,et al., Valley-selective circu- lar dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide, Nat. Commun.3, 887 (2012)

2012
[52]

Zhang, C

F. Zhang, C. S. Ong, J. W. Ruan, M. Wu, X. Q. Shi, Z. K. Tang, and S. G. Louie, Intervalley excitonic hy- bridization, optical selection rules, and imperfect circu- lar dichroism in monolayerh−BN, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 047402 (2022)

2022
[53]

Rodin, L

A. Rodin, L. C. Gomes, A. Carvalho, and A. Castro Neto, Valley physics in tin (II) sulfide, Phys. Rev. B93, 045431 (2016). 12

2016
[54]

S. Lin, A. Carvalho, S. Yan, R. Li, S. Kim, A. Rodin, L. Carvalho, E. M. Chan, X. Wang, A. H. Castro Neto, et al., Accessing valley degree of freedom in bulk Tin (II) sulfide at room temperature, Nat. Commun.9, 1455 (2018)

2018
[55]

Fragkos, B

S. Fragkos, B. Fan, U. De Giovannini, D. Descamps, S. Petit, H. H¨ ubener, A. Rubio, and S. Beaulieu, Symmetry-driven Floquet engineering in multivalley SnS, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2603.11878 (2026)

2026
[56]

M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, The Floquet engineer’s handbook, arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.08252 (2020)

2003 arXiv
[57]

Andrade, D

X. Andrade, D. Strubbe, U. De Giovannini, A. H. Larsen, M. J. Oliveira, J. Alberdi-Rodriguez, A. Varas, I. Theophilou, N. Helbig, M. J. Verstraete,et al., Real- space grids and the Octopus code as tools for the de- velopment of new simulation approaches for electronic systems,...

2015
[58]

Tancogne-Dejean, M

N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. J. Oliveira, X. Andrade, H. Ap- pel, C. H. Borca, G. Le Breton, F. Buchholz, A. Cas- tro, S. Corni, A. A. Correa,et al., Octopus, a compu- tational framework for exploring light-driven phenomena and quantum dynamics in extended and finite systems, J. Che...

2020
[59]

Hartwigsen, S

C. Hartwigsen, S. Goedecker, and J. Hutter, Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn, Phys. Rev. B58, 3641 (1998)

1998

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Hsieh, D

D. Hsieh, D. N. Basov, and R. D. Averitt, Towards prop- erties on demand in quantum materials, Nat. Mater.16, 1077 (2017)

2017

[2] [2]

de la Torre, D

A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

2021

[3] [3]

Bloch, A

J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Ru- bio, Strongly correlated electron–photon systems, Nature 606, 41 (2022)

2022

[4] [4]

C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 33 (2022)

2022

[5] [5]

Sambe, Steady States and Quasienergies of a Quantum-Mechanical System in an Oscillating Field, Phys

H. Sambe, Steady States and Quasienergies of a Quantum-Mechanical System in an Oscillating Field, Phys. Rev. A7, 2203 (1973)

1973

[6] [6]

Oka and S

T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.10, 387 (2019)

2019

[7] [7]

Aeschlimann, S

S. Aeschlimann, S. A. Sato, R. Krause, M. Chavez- Cervantes, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, S. Forti, C. Coletti, K. Hanff, K. Rossnagel, A. Rubio, and I. Gierz, Survival of Floquet-Bloch states in the presence of scattering, Nano Lett.21, 5028 (2021)

2021

[8] [8]

Merboldt, M

M. Merboldt, M. Sch¨ uler, D. Schmitt, J. P. Bange, W. Bennecke, K. Gadge, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, D. Momeni, D. Steil,et al., Observation of Floquet states in graphene, Nat. Phys.21, 1093 (2025)

2025