Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 82 references

Magnetic anisotropy in the near-stoichiometric van der Waals ferromagnet Fe$_3$GeTe$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Near-stoichiometric Fe3GeTe2 is an easy-axis ferromagnet whose low-temperature magnon gap shrinks sharply as iron content rises near n≈3.

desk verdict Solid HF-ESR numbers on near-stoichiometric Fe3GeTe2 plus a clear Fe-content trend in the magnon gap; one real but non-fatal systematic in how they extract Ha(T). read the letter →

arxiv 2607.24543 v1 pith:BD3PD2I2 submitted 2026-07-27 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Riju Pal , Joyal John Abraham , Satyabrata Bera , Mintu Mondal , Atindra Nath Pal , Bernd Buchner , Vladislav Kataev , Alexey Alfonsov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Fe3GeTe2vanderWaalsferromagnetelectronspinresonancemagneticanisotropymagnongapironstoichiometryitinerantmagnetismeasy-axis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses high-frequency electron spin resonance on a slightly iron-rich single crystal of Fe3GeTe2 to measure its magnetic anisotropy and spin-wave gap across frequency, temperature, and field orientation. The data show easy-axis ferromagnetism along the crystal c-axis, a large internal field that survives above the Curie point (signaling short-range spin correlations), and a strong intrinsic uniaxial anisotropy of about −5×10^6 erg cm−3 at 3 K that opens a magnon gap of roughly 88 GHz. Comparing this near-stoichiometric crystal with more iron-deficient samples from the literature, the authors find that small changes in iron occupancy near three atoms per formula unit produce large, roughly exponential drops in the low-temperature magnon gap, while the Curie temperature rises only gradually. The result positions iron stoichiometry as a practical knob for tuning magnon excitations in this metallic van der Waals ferromagnet.

What carries the argument

Uniaxial easy-axis spin-wave resonance conditions (hν = gμBμ0(H+|Ha|) for H∥c and the corresponding square-root forms for H⊥c), used to extract the total anisotropy field Ha from ν–H and T-dependent resonance positions, then corrected by subtracting the shape demagnetization field HD = 4πNMs to isolate K_int and the magnon gap.

What would settle it

Repeat frequency-dependent ESR on a second crystal of the same measured stoichiometry (or a deliberately varied Fe content near n=3) and check whether the zero-field intercept still yields Δ(3 K) ≈ 88 GHz and whether the gap continues to track the reported exponential drop with Fe occupancy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Frequency- and temperature-dependent ESR on Fe3.03±0.03GeTe2 establish it as a uniaxial easy-axis ferromagnet with intrinsic magnetocrystalline anisotropy K_int ≈ −5×10^6 erg cm−3 at 3 K and zero-field magnon gap Δ(3 K) ≈ 87.8 ± 13.7 GHz; the same data, placed against prior Fe-deficient compositions, show that the low-T magnon gap falls steeply with rising Fe content near n≈3 while short-range correlations keep a finite resonance shift above TC.

Load-bearing premise

The total anisotropy field is obtained by locking the g-factor to its room-temperature paramagnetic value and by treating the crystal as a plate with a fixed demagnetization factor of about 0.76; if either choice is wrong, the quoted anisotropy and gap shift systematically.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Iron stoichiometry becomes a microscopic control parameter for engineering magnon gaps in metallic Fe_nGeTe2 without large changes in Curie temperature.
  • The persistence of an internal field above TC supplies direct spectroscopic evidence of short-range ferromagnetic correlations that remain static on the ~10 ps ESR timescale.
  • Near-stoichiometric Fe3GeTe2 can serve as a reference metallic 2D ferromagnet against which more Fe-deficient or Fe-richer members of the family are compared.
  • The large, temperature-stable gap below ~100 K offers a concrete target for magnonics or spin-wave devices that exploit composition-tuned anisotropy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the exponential gap-versus-n trend continues, intentional sub-percent Fe tuning could dial the magnon gap across nearly an order of magnitude while keeping TC near 200 K.
  • The plateau in K_int below ~100 K may share a common electronic origin with the reported Kondo-lattice crossover, suggesting joint ESR–ARPE S or DFT+U studies could link band reconstruction to anisotropy.
  • Because shape anisotropy is smaller than the intrinsic term, thin-flake devices should retain most of the bulk easy-axis gap, making stoichiometry control relevant even in the 2D limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a broadband (75–330 GHz) high-field ESR/FMR study of a near-stoichiometric Fe3.03(3)GeTe2 single crystal over 3–300 K and both principal field orientations. Frequency-dependent measurements establish easy-axis ferromagnetism and yield a zero-field magnon gap Δ(3 K) ≈ 87.8 ± 13.7 GHz from the frequency-axis intercept of the ν–H diagram. Temperature-dependent ~300 GHz measurements are used to extract the total anisotropy field Ha(T) via standard uniaxial spin-wave formulas with g fixed at the 300 K paramagnetic value 2.07; subtracting a shape-anisotropy contribution (N ≈ 0.76) gives an intrinsic anisotropy constant K_int ≈ −5×10^6 erg/cm³ at 3 K. An independent area-method estimate of Ha from static M–H curves agrees reasonably. The authors further report a finite resonance shift persisting up to ~300 K, interpreted as short-range spin correlations, and compile literature gaps across the Fe_nGeTe2 family to argue that the low-T magnon gap is extremely sensitive to Fe content near n ≈ 3 while T_C rises roughly linearly.

Significance. If the analysis holds up, the paper delivers a quantitative anisotropy budget for a member of the Fe_nGeTe2 family close to the stoichiometric limit, where data have been sparse. Notable strengths: (i) the headline magnon gap is a direct frequency-axis intercept of the ν–H diagram at 3 K and 100 K, obtained with unconstrained g-factors, making it comparatively model-light and falsifiable against future INS or THz measurements; (ii) the ESR-derived anisotropy field is cross-checked against a g-independent static-magnetization area method (Appendices G–H) with agreement within ~0.5 T; (iii) error bars are conservatively set at the ~1 T linewidth; (iv) the composition trend in Fig. 6(b), spanning the Fe_nGeTe2 series, is a genuinely useful synthesis pointing to Fe content as a strong tuning parameter for the gap. The persistence of a resonance shift above T_C, interpreted as short-range correlations static on the ~10 ps ESR timescale, is also of interest, though more qualitative. These are solid contributions that merit publication once the low-temperature analysis systematic is addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.C (and Eqs. 2.1, 3–6; Fig. 4)] The entire Ha(T) curve in Fig. 4(a), and hence K_int(T) in Fig. 4(b), Hint in Fig. A10(b), and Delta(15 K)=97.4 GHz via Eq. 6, is extracted from the ~300 GHz resonance fields by fixing g=2.07 (the 300 K paramagnetic value). However, the authors' own unconstrained nu-H fits in Sec. III.A give g_3K=1.96+-0.08 and g_100K=2.04+-0.07. The error is therefore temperature-dependent and largest exactly at low T. Using Eq. 2.1, re-evaluating the 3 K resonance field implied by the Fig. 2(a) fit (g=1.96, Ha~3.2 T, i.e. H_res(300 GHz)~7.7 T) with fixed g=2.07 yields |Ha|~2.65 T — a ~0.5 T (~17%) downward shift at 3 K, propagating linearly into K_int=H_int*Ms/2 and Delta(T). This systematic is comparable to the quoted gap error bar (+-13.7 GHz) but is not included in it, and it distorts the *shape* of Ha(T), not just its scale: the claimed plateau below ~100 K (Fig. 4) and its proposed connection to t
  2. [§II / Appendix A (composition), and Fig. 6(b)] The EDX analysis (Appendix A) gives an average composition Fe3.03(3)Ge0.89(4)Te2.00(1), i.e. a ~10% Ge deficiency, yet throughout the manuscript the sample is described as Fe3.03±0.03GeTe2, with the Te content normalized to 2 and the Ge deficiency never mentioned in the main text. This matters for the paper's central theme: the composition-sensitivity claim and the placement of this sample at n=3.03 on the n-axis of Fig. 6(b) assume that Fe content is the only relevant compositional variable. If the Ge deficiency is real, the sample is not simply 'slightly Fe-rich', and the comparison with Fe-deficient (vacancy) compositions in Fig. 6(b) conflates two different kinds of off-stoichiometry; if it is an artefact of EDX quantification (e.g. Ge/Te line overlaps or surface effects on cleaved vdW crystals), that should be argued explicitly. Given that the abstract's claim about stoichiometry se
  3. [§III.C, Fig. 6(b)] The claim that the zero-field gap 'decreases sharply... following an approximately exponential trend' with Fe content (restated in the Abstract as a headline result) is based on ~7 points compiled from inelastic neutron scattering, magnetization, and FMR measurements by different groups on samples with different growth histories and characterizations. The functional-form claim is an over-interpretation of sparse, heterogeneous data, and the apparent sharp sensitivity near n~3 could partly reflect systematic differences between probes (INS gaps are measured at finite energy resolution and often at base temperature only; FMR gaps carry the same g and demagnetization systematics as Major Comment 1). The qualitative trend — an order-of-magnitude drop of the gap from n=2.75 to n=3.03 while T_C rises — is robust and worth keeping; the 'approximately exponential' parametrization is not establis
minor comments (6)
  1. [§III.C, Eq. (5)] In the text following Eq. 5, the statement that for K_u<0 the energy is minimized at theta=0 with 'E_ani = -K_u' is incorrect: E_ani = K_u cos^2(theta) gives E_ani = K_u (<0) at theta=0 and 0 at theta=pi/2. The signs in the surrounding description should be checked and corrected.
  2. [§III.C, Eqs. (3)–(4)] The demagnetization factor N~0.76 is taken from Osborn/Cronemeyer ellipsoid formulas applied to a rectangular platelet (1.74 x 1.47 x 0.24 mm^3). For rectangular prisms, magnetometric demagnetization factors (e.g. Aharoni, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 3432 (1998)) are more appropriate; the difference is small here (H_D~0.4 T vs H_a~3.2 T, so a 10% error in N shifts K_int by only ~1–2%), but the citation should match the geometry actually used.
  3. [§III.C, Fig. 4(b)] The statement that K_int is 'nearly a factor of two smaller' than that of Fe2.92GeTe2 (Ref. [16]) compares negative quantities; please clarify that this refers to the magnitude |K_int|. Also give an explicit uncertainty on the 3 K value K_int ~ -5 x 10^6 erg/cm^3, which is quoted without error bars in the Abstract and Conclusion.
  4. [§II (data analysis)] The procedure of manually picking H_res and DeltaH from mixed absorption/dispersion lineshapes (Sec. II) is a potential source of bias for broad (~1 T FWHM) lines; the conservative ~1 T error bars mitigate this, but a brief statement of the reproducibility of the manual picking (e.g. scatter between independent picks, or comparison with the lineshape-simulation approach of Ref. [11]) would strengthen the error budget.
  5. [§III.C, Eq. (6)] Delta(3 K)=87.8 GHz is compared with Delta(15 K)=97.4 GHz and stated to agree 'within error bars'; the two numbers come from different methods (nu-H intercept with free g vs. Eq. 6 with fixed g), so after addressing Major Comment 1 the comparison should be revisited and the method dependence stated.
  6. [Fig. 5; Abstract; §II] Fig. 5 is a qualitative rendering of Eq. 5 and adds little beyond what the text and Fig. 4 convey; consider moving it to an appendix. Typographical: 'magnetocrystalline anisotropyK int' (missing space) in the Abstract; '750 0 C' and '700 0 C' in Sec. II; inconsistent use of EPR/FMR/ESR terminology early in Sec. II could be tightened.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Ha, K_int and Δ are extracted from measured resonance fields via standard spin-wave formulas, not forced by construction or self-citation.

full rationale

The load-bearing quantities are obtained by fitting measured ν–H and H_res(T) data to textbook uniaxial easy-axis FMR relations (Eqs. 2.1–2.3) and by subtracting a geometry-based demagnetization field HD=4πNMs. The zero-field magnon gap is a frequency-axis intercept (or equivalent |Ha| conversion), not a quantity normalized to equal a predefined target. Composition trends in Fig. 6 combine this sample’s EDX stoichiometry with external literature gaps and TC values; they are comparative, not self-predictive. Self-citations (e.g. the authors’ Fe4GeTe2 ESR work [11] and the crystal-growth report [52]) supply method background and comparison points only; none is a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the present Ha, K_int or Δ. Fixed-g and N approximations are methodological systematics (correctness risk), not circular reductions of outputs to inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The load-bearing content is experimental extraction of anisotropy fields and magnon gaps under the standard uniaxial easy-axis FMR model, plus subtraction of shape anisotropy with an approximate demagnetization factor. No new particles or forces are postulated. Free parameters are the usual spectroscopic fits (g, Ha) and geometric N; axioms are textbook resonance conditions and demagnetization physics.

free parameters (4)
  • g-factors (orientation- and T-dependent fits) = g_av(3 K)≈1.96±0.08; g_av(100 K)≈2.04±0.07; g(300 K)≈2.07±0.04
    Unconstrained or average g values are fitted from ν–H diagrams at 3 K, 100 K, and 300 K and then used to fix or interpret Ha and Δ.
  • total anisotropy field Ha(T) = ~3.2 T scale at low T (negative easy-axis sign)
    Extracted at each temperature from H_res at ~300 GHz via Eqs. 2.1–2.2 with g fixed to the paramagnetic value; central input to K_int and Δ(T).
  • demagnetization factor N = N≈0.76
    Chosen from plate-like dimensions 1.74×1.47×0.24 mm to compute HD=4πNMs and isolate Hint; not measured independently on the ESR sample.
  • resonance field H_res and linewidth ΔH (manual)
    Because of absorption–dispersion mixing, H_res is picked at the line minimum and FWHM by hand rather than full lineshape fit (§II).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Paramagnetic resonance condition hν = g μB μ0 H_res^para (Eq. 1)
    Used to define the 300 K reference line and δH(T) shifts throughout §III.
  • domain assumption Spin-wave energies of a single-sublattice uniaxial easy-axis ferromagnet (Eqs. 2.1–2.3)
    Entire frequency- and temperature-dependent analysis and gap intercept assume this continuum FMR model applies to bulk Fe3GeTe2.
  • domain assumption Total anisotropy field decomposes as Ha = Hint + HD with HD = 4π N Ms (Eqs. 3–4)
    Required to claim intrinsic magnetocrystalline K_int separate from sample shape (§III.C).
  • domain assumption EDX average composition Fe3.03(3)Ge0.89(4)Te2.00(1) represents the resonating crystal stoichiometry
    Composition sensitivity claim and placement on the gap-vs-n plot rest on this characterization (Appendix A).
  • domain assumption Area-method effective MAE from M–H isotherms is comparable to ESR-derived K_eff for this uniaxial system
    Used as independent cross-check in Appendix G–H; standard but approximate for real crystals with domains/hysteresis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic anisotropy in the near-stoichiometric van der Waals ferromagnet Fe$_3$GeTe$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BD3PD2I2

@misc{pith2026260724543,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic anisotropy in the near-stoichiometric van der Waals ferromagnet Fe$_3$GeTe$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BD3PD2I2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.24543}
}
abstract

Quasi-two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) ferromagnets such as the series Fe$_{3-x}$GeTe$_2$, with a relatively high Curie temperature and robust metallicity, offer an ideal platform for investigating itinerant magnetism in reduced dimensions. Here, we present a comprehensive electron spin resonance (ESR) investigation of single-crystalline almost-stoichiometric Fe$_{3.03 \pm 0.03}$GeTe$_{2}$ across wide ranges of frequencies, temperatures, and magnetic fields to gain quantitative insights into its magnetic anisotropy and spin dynamics. Frequency-dependent ESR measurements establish Fe$_{3}$GeTe$_{2}$ as an easy-axis ferromagnet. Temperature-dependent high-field ESR reveals a large internal field that gradually decreases at higher temperatures. Remarkably, this internal field persists even above $T_\mathrm{C}$, evidencing short-range spin correlations in Fe$_{3}$GeTe$_{2}$. Analysis of spin-wave modes yields a strong uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy $K_{\text{int}} \approx - 5 \times 10^6$ erg cm$^{-3}$ at 3 K and a large magnon gap $\Delta(3 \mathrm{K})$ $\approx$ 87.8 $\pm$ 13.7 GHz ($\approx$ 0.363 $\pm$ 0.057 meV). Our study highlights that small variations in Fe content in Fe$_{3}$GeTe$_{2}$ lead to substantial changes in the magnon gap at low temperatures, indicating the extreme sensitivity of spin dynamics to the chemical composition. These results establish Fe$_{3}$GeTe$_{2}$ as a model vdW ferromagnet for exploring tunable anisotropies and magnon excitations in metallic 2D magnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24543 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Crystal structure of Fe3GeTe2. The unit cell (left) and the top view (right) of a single vdW layer of Fe3GeTe2 are shown here. The unit cell is enclosed using the dotted lines. The top view of the structure shows the hexagonal symmetry of the ab plane. Two inequivalent Fe sites are termed Fe1 and Fe2. (b) The temperature dependence of magnetization and its temperature derivative, measured under a magnetic field … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Frequency dependence of the resonance fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Temperature evolution of the HF-ESR spectra in the field direction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Total anisotropy field Ha as a function of temperature for both H ⊥ c and H ∥ c configurations, extracted from the temperature dependence of the resonance fields. The purple solid line is the calculated shape anisotropy field HD given by the shape of the crystal. G…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Anisotropy energy density demonstration in Carte [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Comparison of zero-field magnon excitation gap (left axis and blue symbols) and intrinsic magnetocrystalline [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, 2D materials and van der Waals het- erostructures, Science353, 9439 (2016). 14

    2016

  2. [2]

    Correlated Magnetism – From Frustration 8 to Topology

    This observation highlights thec-axis as the dominant magnetic easy-axis at all temperatures, aligning with the magnetization data (see Appendix E) [34, 39, 45]. Notably, the resonance shift (δH(T)) remains finite for both field orientations even at temperatures up to∼300 K (Fig. 3(c)), approximately 85 K above theT C ≈215 K of Fe3GeTe2, determined at an ...

    2019

  3. [3]

    E. C. Ahn, 2D materials for spintronic devices, npj 2D Materials and Applications4(2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Gong and X

    C. Gong and X. Zhang, Two-dimensional magnetic crys- tals and emergent heterostructure devices, Science363 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Q. Hao, H. Dai, M. Cai, X. Chen, Y. Xing, H. Chen, T. Zhai, X. Wang, and J. Han, 2D Magnetic Heterostruc- tures and Emergent Spintronic Devices, Advanced Elec- tronic Materials8, 1 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, and J.-G. Park, Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials, Nature563, 47 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of ferromag- netism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic heisenberg models, Physical Review Letters17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  8. [8]

    A. H. Morrish,The physical principles of magnetism (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2001)

    2001

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    J. M. Coey,Magnetism and Magnetic Materials(Cam- bridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    Kataev, B

    V. Kataev, B. B¨ uchner, and A. Alfonsov, Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy on Magnetic van der Waals Compounds, Applied Magnetic Resonance55, 923 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    C. Cho, A. Pawbake, N. Aubergier, A. Barra, K. Mosina, Z. Sofer, M. Zhitomirsky, C. Faugeras, and B. Piot, Mi- croscopic parameters of the van der Waals CrSBr an- tiferromagnet from microwave absorption experiments, Physical Review B107, 094403 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    R. Pal, J. J. Abraham, A. Mistonov, S. Mishra, N. Stilk- erich, S. Mondal, P. Mandal, A. N. Pal, J. Geck, B. B¨ uchner, V. Kataev, and A. Alfonsov, Disentangling the Unusual Magnetic Anisotropy of the Near-Room- Temperature Ferromagnet Fe 4GeTe2, Advanced Func- tional Material...

    2024

  5. [13]

    F. Moro, S. Ke, A. G. del ´Aguila, A. S¨ oll, Z. Sofer, Q. Wu, M. Yue, L. Li, X. Liu, and M. Fanciulli, Revealing 2D magnetism in a bulk CrSBr single crystal by electron spin resonance, Advanced Functional Materials32, 2207044 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    I. Lee, F. G. Utermohlen, D. Weber, K. Hwang, C. Zhang, J. Van Tol, J. E. Goldberger, N. Trivedi, and P. C. Hammel, Fundamental spin interactions underlying the magnetic anisotropy in the Kitaev ferromagnet CrI 3, Physical Review Letters124, 017201 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    R. Pal, K. Deb, N. Kumar, B. B¨ uchner, A. Alfonsov, and V. Kataev, Ferromagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy on the Kagome Magnet MgMn 6Sn6, Applied Magnetic Resonance56, 1507 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    X. Wang, Z. Shang, C. Zhang, J. Kang, T. Liu, X. Wang, S. Chen, H. Liu, W. Tang, Y.-J. Zeng,et al., Electrical and magnetic anisotropies in van der Waals multiferroic CuCrP2S6, Nature Communications14, 840 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    B. G. Beier, E. S. Beier, J. Arneth, E. Br¨ ucher, R. K. Kremer, and R. Klingeler, Elucidating the origin of long- range ferromagnetic order in Fe 3GeTe2 by low-energy magnon excitation studies, Physical Review B112, 214414 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Alfonsov, K

    A. Alfonsov, K. Mehlawat, A. Zeugner, A. Isaeva, B. B¨ uchner, and V. Kataev, Magnetic-field tuning of the spin dynamics in the magnetic topological insulators (MnBi2Te4)(Bi2Te3)n, Physical Review B104, 195139 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Alahmed, B

    L. Alahmed, B. Nepal, J. Macy, W. Zheng, B. Casas, A. Sapkota, N. Jones, A. R. Mazza, M. Brahlek, W. Jin, M. Mahjouri-Samani, S. S.-L. Zhang, C. Mewes, L. Bali- cas, T. Mewes, and P. Li, Magnetism and spin dynamics in room-temperature van der Waals magnet Fe 5GeTe2, 2D Materia...

    2021

  12. [20]

    Zeisner, K

    J. Zeisner, K. Mehlawat, A. Alfonsov, M. Roslova, T. Do- ert, A. Isaeva, B. B¨ uchner, and V. Kataev, Electron spin resonance and ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy in the high-field phase of the van der Waals magnet CrCl 3, Physical Review Materials4, 064406 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature54...

    2017

  14. [22]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Discovery of intrinsic fer- romagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature546, 265 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Jiang, Q

    X. Jiang, Q. Liu, J. Xing, N. Liu, Y. Guo, Z. Liu, and J. Zhao, Recent progress on 2D magnets: Fundamental mechanism, structural design and modification, Applied Physics Reviews8(2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    X. Shen, H. Chen, Y. Li, H. Xia, F. Zeng, J. Xu, H. Y. Kwon, Y. Ji, C. Won, W. Zhang, and Y. Wu, Multi- domain ferromagnetic resonance in magnetic van der Waals crystals CrI 3 and CrBr 3, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials528(2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    T. J. Williams, A. A. Aczel, M. D. Lumsden, S. E. Na- gler, M. B. Stone, J. Q. Yan, and D. Mandrus, Magnetic correlations in the quasi-two-dimensional semiconduct- ing ferromagnet CrSiTe3, Physical Review B92, 144404 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    J. U. Lee, S. Lee, J. H. Ryoo, S. Kang, T. Y. Kim, P. Kim, C. H. Park, J. G. Park, and H. Cheong, Ising-Type Mag- netic Ordering in Atomically Thin FePS 3, Nano Letters 16, 7433 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    X. Wang, J. Cao, H. Li, Z. Lu, A. Cohen, A. Haldar, H. Kitadai, Q. Tan, K. S. Burch, D. Smirnov, W. Xu, S. Sharifzadeh, L. Liang, and X. Ling, Electronic Raman scattering in the 2D antiferromagnet NiPS 3, Science Ad- vances8, 1 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable room-temperature ferro- magnetism in two-dimensional Fe 3GeTe2, Nature563, 94 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    R. Pal, B. Pal, S. Mondal, R. O. Sharma, T. Das, P. Man- dal, and A. N. Pal, Spin-reorientation driven emergent phases and unconventional magnetotransport in quasi- 2D vdW ferromagnet Fe 4GeTe2, npj 2D Materials and Applications8, 30 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    J. Seo, D. Y. Kim, E. S. An, K. Kim, G.-Y. Kim, S.- Y. Hwang, D. W. Kim, B. G. Jang, H. Kim, G. Eom, S. Y. Seo, R. Stania, M. Muntwiler, J. Lee, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Y. J. Jo, J. Lee, B. I. Min, M. H. Jo, H. W. Yeom, S.-Y. Choi, J. H. Shim, and J. S. Kim, Nearly room tem...

    2020

  23. [31]

    S. Bera, S. K. Pradhan, M. S. Khan, R. Pal, B. Pal, S. Kalimuddin, A. Bera, B. Das, A. N. Pal, and M. Mon- dal, Unravelling the nature of spin reorientation tran- sition in quasi-2D vdW magnetic material, Fe 4GeTe2, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials565, 10.1016/j.jmm...

    2022

  24. [32]

    Tan, W.-Q

    C. Tan, W.-Q. Xie, G. Zheng, N. Aloufi, S. Albarakati, M. Algarni, J. Li, J. Partridge, D. Culcer, X. Wang, J. B. Yi, M. Tian, Y. Xiong, Y.-J. Zhao, and L. Wang, Gate- Controlled Magnetic Phase Transition in a van der Waals Magnet Fe5GeTe2, Nano Letters21, 5599 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    R. Pal, M. N. Hasan, C. Nayak, M. Deka, N. Salehi, M. Pereiro, S. Mondal, A. Misra, A. Singha, P. Man- dal,et al., Spin Reorientation Driven Renormalization of Spin-Phonon Coupling in Fe 4GeTe2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.18544 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    A. F. May, C. A. Bridges, and M. A. McGuire, Physi- cal properties and thermal stability of Fe5−xGeTe2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 104401 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Z. Fei, B. Huang, P. Malinowski, W. Wang, T. Song, J. Sanchez, W. Yao, D. Xiao, X. Zhu, A. F. May, W. Wu, D. H. Cobden, J.-H. Chu, and X. Xu, Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe 3GeTe2, Nature Materials17, 778 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    R. Pal, S. Bera, B. Pal, M. Mondal, and A. N. Pal, Intrin- sic room temperature ferromagnetism in van der Waals Fe5GeTe2 crystal, AIP Conference Proceedings3067, 20002 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Albarakati, C

    S. Albarakati, C. Tan, Z. J. Chen, J. G. Partridge, G. Zheng, L. Farrar, E. L. Mayes, M. R. Field, C. Lee, Y. Wang, Y. Xiong, M. Tian, F. Xiang, A. R. Hamilton, O. A. Tretiakov, D. Culcer, Y. J. Zhao, and L. Wang, Antisymmetric magnetoresistance in van der Waals Fe3GeTe2/graph...

    2019

  30. [38]

    L. Zhou, J. Huang, M. Tang, C. Qiu, F. Qin, C. Zhang, Z. Li, D. Wu, and H. Yuan, Gate-tunable spin valve ef- fect in Fe 3GeTe2-based van der Waals heterostructures, InfoMat , 1 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    B. Chen, J. Yang, H. Wang, M. Imai, H. Ohta, C. Mi- chioka, K. Yoshimura, and M. Fang, Magnetic Properties of Layered Itinerant Electron Ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan82, 124711 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Y. Wang, C. Xian, J. Wang, B. Liu, L. Ling, L. Zhang, L. Cao, Z. Qu, and Y. Xiong, Anisotropic anomalous Hall effect in triangular itinerant ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2, Physical Review B96, 1 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Lu, X. Zhu, S. Tan, W. Feng, Q. Liu, W. Zhang, Q. Chen, Y. Liu, X. Luo, D. Xie, L. Luo, Z. Zhang, and X. Lai, Emergence of Kondo lattice behav- ior in a van der Waals itinerant ferromagnet, Fe 3GeTe2, Science Advances4, 1 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Xu, Y.-C

    Y. Xu, Y.-C. Wang, X. Jin, H. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Song, and F. Tian, Mechanism of magnetic phase transition in correlated magnetic metal: insight into itinerant fer- romagnet Fe3−δGeTe2, Communications Physics7, 381 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    T. J. Kim, S. Ryee, and M. J. Han, Fe 3GeTe2: a site- differentiated Hund metal, npj Computational Materials 8, 245 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    K. Kim, J. Seo, E. Lee, K. T. Ko, B. S. Kim, B. G. Jang, J. M. Ok, J. Lee, Y. J. Jo, W. Kang, J. H. Shim, C. Kim, H. W. Yeom, B. Il Min, B. J. Yang, and J. S. Kim, Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal, Na- t...

    2018

  37. [45]

    B. Ding, Z. Li, G. Xu, H. Li, Z. Hou, E. Liu, X. Xi, F. Xu, Y. Yao, and W. Wang, Observation of Mag- netic Skyrmion Bubbles in a van der Waals Ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2, Nano Letters20, 868 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    C. Tan, J. Lee, S. G. Jung, T. Park, S. Albarakati, J. Partridge, M. R. Field, D. G. McCulloch, L. Wang, and C. Lee, Hard magnetic properties in nanoflake van der Waals Fe 3GeTe2, Nature Communications9, 1554 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    X. Hu, Y. Zhao, X. Shen, A. V. Krasheninnikov, Z. Chen, and L. Sun, Enhanced ferromagnetism and tunable mag- netism in Fe 3GeTe2 monolayer by strain engineering, ACS applied materials & interfaces12, 26367 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Weerahennedige, M

    H. Weerahennedige, M. Irziqat, D. Vithanage, H. Weer- arathne, Z. Ronau, G. Sumanasekera, and J. B. Jasinski, The effects of thickness, polarization, and strain on vi- brational modes of 2D Fe3GeTe2, Surfaces and Interfaces 51, 104797 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Y. Liu, V. N. Ivanovski, and C. Petrovic, Critical behavior of the van der Waals bonded ferromagnet Fe3−xGeTe2, Physical Review B96(2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    A. F. May, S. Calder, C. Cantoni, H. Cao, and M. A. McGuire, Magnetic structure and phase stability of the van der Waals bonded ferromagnet Fe3−xGeTe2, Physical Review B93(2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    D. A. Mayoh, G. D. A. Wood, S. J. R. Holt, G. Beckett, E. J. L. Dekker, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrishnan, Effects of Fe Deficiency and Co Substitution in Polycrystalline and Single Crystals of Fe3GeTe2, Crystal Growth & Design21, 6786 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00684

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    Backes, R

    D. Backes, R. Fujita, L. S. I. Veiga, D. A. Mayoh, G. D. A. Wood, S. S. Dhesi, G. Balakrishnan, G. van der Laan, and T. Hesjedal, Valence-state mixing and reduced magnetic moment in Fe 3−δGeTe2 single crystals with varying Fe content probed by x-ray spectroscopy, Nan- otechnol...

    2024

  45. [53]

    S. Bera, S. K. Pradhan, R. Pal, B. Pal, A. Bera, S. Kalimuddin, M. Das, D. S. Roy, H. Afzal, A. N. Pal, and M. Mondal, Enhanced coercivity and emer- gent spin-cluster-glass state in 2D ferromagnetic mate- rial, Fe3GeTe2, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma- terials583, 171052 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    J. Yi, H. Zhuang, Q. Zou, Z. Wu, G. Cao, S. Tang, S. A. Calder, P. R. Kent, D. Mandrus, and Z. Gai, Competing antiferromagnetism in a quasi-2D itinerant ferromagnet: Fe3GeTe2, 2D Materials4, 011005 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Farle, Ferromagnetic resonance of ultrathin metallic layers, Reports on Progress in Physics61, 755 (1998)

    M. Farle, Ferromagnetic resonance of ultrathin metallic layers, Reports on Progress in Physics61, 755 (1998)

    1998

  48. [56]

    Abragam and B

    A. Abragam and B. Bleaney,Electron paramagnetic res- onance of transition ions(Oxford University Press, Ox- ford, 2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    E. A. Turov,Physical Properties of Magnetically Ordered Crystals, edited by A. Tybulewicz and S. Chomet (Aca- demic Press, New York, 1965)

    1965

  50. [58]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field Dependence of the Intrinsic Domain Magnetization of a Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  51. [59]

    Y. Yang, F. Meng, W. Liu, J. Li, J. Zhang, J. Fan, C. Ma, M. Ge, L. Pi, Z. Qu, and L. Zhang, Electron spin resonance study of the van der Waals ferromagnet 16 Fe5GeTe2, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 629, 173251 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Jonak, E

    M. Jonak, E. Walendy, J. Arneth, M. Abdel-Hafiez, and R. Klingeler, Low-energy magnon excitations and emerg- ing anisotropic nature of short-range order in CrI3, Phys- ical Review B106, 214412 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Dillon Jr and C

    J. Dillon Jr and C. Olson, Magnetization, resonance, and optical properties of the ferromagnet CrI3, Journal of Ap- plied Physics36, 1259 (1965)

    1965

  54. [62]

    Li, D.-H

    Z. Li, D.-H. Xu, X. Li, H.-J. Liao, X. Xi, Y.-C. Yu, and W. Wang, Anomalous spin dynamics in a two- dimensional magnet induced by anisotropic critical fluc- tuations, Physical Review B106, 054427 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    S. Khan, C. Zollitsch, D. Arroo, H. Cheng, I. Verzhbit- skiy, A. Sud, Y. Feng, G. Eda, and H. Kurebayashi, Spin dynamics study in layered van der Waals single-crystal Cr2Ge2Te6, Physical Review B100, 134437 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    Zeisner, A

    J. Zeisner, A. Alfonsov, S. Selter, S. Aswartham, M. P. Ghimire, M. Richter, J. Van Den Brink, B. B¨ uchner, and V. Kataev, Magnetic anisotropy and spin-polarized two- dimensional electron gas in the van der Waals ferromag- net Cr2Ge2Te6, Physical Review B99, 165109 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Y. Wang, Q. Fu, S. Ji, X. Yin, Y. Chen, R. Liu, and X. Li, Temperature-dependent magnetic order of two-dimensional ferromagnetic Cr2Ge2Te6 single crystal, Journal of Alloys and Compounds931, 167401 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    J. A. Osborn, Demagnetizing factors of the general ellip- soid, Phys. Rev.67, 351 (1945)

    1945

  59. [67]

    D. C. Cronemeyer, Demagnetization factors for general ellipsoids, J. Appl. Phys.70, 2911 (1991)

    1991

  60. [68]

    B. D. Cullity and C. D. Graham,Introduction to mag- netic materials(John Wiley & Sons, 2011)

    2011

  61. [69]

    J.-X. Zhu, M. Janoschek, D. S. Chaves, J. C. Cezar, T. Durakiewicz, F. Ronning, Y. Sassa, M. Mansson, B. L. Scott, N. Wakeham, E. D. Bauer, and J. D. Thompson, Electronic correlation and magnetism in the ferromag- netic metal Fe 3GeTe2, Physical Review B93, 144404 (2016)

    2016

  62. [70]

    Q. Liu, J. Xing, Z. Jiang, Y. Guo, X. Jiang, Y. Qi, and J. Zhao, Layer-dependent magnetic phase diagram in FenGeTe2 (3≤n≤7) ultrathin films, Communica- tions Physics5, 140 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    Calder, A

    S. Calder, A. I. Kolesnikov, and A. F. May, Mag- netic excitations in the quasi-two-dimensional ferromag- net Fe3−xGeTe2 measured with inelastic neutron scatter- ing, Physical Review B99, 094423 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Trainer, O

    C. Trainer, O. R. Armitage, H. Lane, L. C. Rhodes, E. Chan, I. Benediˇ ciˇ c, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, O. Fa- belo, C. Stock, and P. Wahl, Relating spin-polarized STM imaging and inelastic neutron scattering in the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2, Physical Review B106, L081...

    2022

  65. [73]

    S. Bao, J. Wang, S.-i. Yano, Y. Shangguan, Z. Huang, J. Liao, W. Wang, Y. Gao, B. Zhang, S. Cheng,et al., Observation of Magnon Damping Minimum Induced by Kondo Coupling in a van der Waals Ferromagnet Fe3−xGeTe2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.15961 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    X. Bai, F. Lechermann, Y. Liu, Y. Cheng, A. I. Kolesnikov, F. Ye, T. J. Williams, S. Chi, T. Hong, G. E. Granroth,et al., Antiferromagnetic fluctuations and orbital-selective Mott transition in the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3−xGeTe2, Physical Review B106, L180409 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    S. Bao, W. Wang, Y. Shangguan, Z. Cai, Z.-Y. Dong, Z. Huang, W. Si, Z. Ma, R. Kajimoto, K. Ikeuchi,et al., Neutron spectroscopy evidence on the dual nature of magnetic excitations in a van der Waals metallic fer- romagnet Fe 2.72GeTe2, Physical Review X12, 011022 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Corasaniti, R

    M. Corasaniti, R. Yang, K. Sen, K. Willa, M. Merz, A. A. Haghighirad, M. Le Tacon, and L. Degiorgi, Electronic correlations in the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2 revealed by its charge dynamics, Physical Review B102, 161109 (2020)

    2020

  69. [77]

    J. Liu, L. Zhou, S. Li, E. Zhao, and N. Tang, Anomalous temperature dependence of uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy in the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 3GeTe2, Physical Review B109, L060404 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    Z. Shu, S. Zhang, and T. Kong, Spin stiffness and spin ex- citation gap of van der Waals ferromagnetic Fe3+δGeTe2, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 385801 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    M. T. Johnson, P. J. H. Bloemen, F. J. A. den Broeder, and J. J. de Vries, Magnetic anisotropy in metallic mul- tilayers, Reports on Progress in Physics59, 1409 (1996)

    1996

  72. [80]

    Williams, Magnetic properties of single crystals of sil- icon iron, Physical Review52, 747 (1937)

    H. Williams, Magnetic properties of single crystals of sil- icon iron, Physical Review52, 747 (1937)

    1937

  73. [81]

    Huang, N

    Y. Huang, N. Zuo, Z. Zhang, X. Xing, X. Yao, A. Zhang, H. Ma, C. Xu, W. Jiao, W. Zhou, R. Sankar, D. Qian, and X. Xu, In-Plane Magnetic Anisotropy and Large Topological Hall Effect in Self-Intercalated Ferromagnet Cr1.61Te2, Advanced Functional Materialsn/a, e10351 (2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    H. B. Tran, H. Momida, Y.-i. Matsushita, K. Sato, Y. Makino, K. Shirai, and T. Oguchi, Effect of magne- tocrystalline anisotropy on magnetocaloric properties of an AlFe2B2 compound, Physical Review B105, 134402 (2022). 17

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.