REVIEW
Towards Optimal Primary- and Secondary-control Design for Networks with Generators and Inverters
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
For power grids predominantly featuring large synchronous generators (SGs), there exists a significant body of work bridging optimization and control tasks. A generic workflow in such efforts entails: characterizing the steady state of control algorithms and SG dynamics; assessing the optimality of the resulting operating point with respect to an optimal dispatch task; and prescribing control parameters to ensure that (under reasonable ambient perturbations) the considered control nudges the system steady state to optimality. Well studied instances of the aforementioned approach include designing: i) automatic generation control (AGC) participation factors to ensure economic optimality, and ii) governor frequency-droop slopes to ensure power sharing. Recognizing that future power grids will feature a diverse mix of SGs and inverter-based resources (IBRs) with varying control structures, this work examines the different steps of the optimization-control workflow for this context. Considering a representative model of active power-frequency dynamics of IBRs and SGs, a characterization of steady state is put forth (with and without secondary frequency control). Conditions on active-power droop slopes and AGC participation factors are then derived to ascertain desired power sharing and ensure economically optimal operation under varying power demands.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.