Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

A non-monotonic spatial reparametrization turns exact soliton solutions of shifted nonlocal NLS and MKdV equations into loop-type folded wave profiles without changing the underlying PDE solutions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 08:38 UTC pith:BDCVYGNY

load-bearing objection Clean geometric reparametrization of the author's prior solitons; elementary, correctly executed, and modest in novelty and significance. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.10870 v1 pith:BDCVYGNY submitted 2026-07-12 nlin.SI

Loop-type geometric folding of exact solutions of shifted nonlocal NLS and MKdV equations

classification nlin.SI MSC 35Q5537K4035C08
keywords shifted nonlocal reductionNLS equationMKdV equationnon-monotonic parametrizationloop-type folded profilefoldonsoliton solutions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that exact one- and two-soliton solutions of several shifted nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger and modified Korteweg-de Vries equations can be redrawn as multi-valued loop-type waves by a purely geometric change of the spatial coordinate. The change is a simple map of the form x equals a constant plus the parameter plus a deformation term controlled by a real amplitude; whenever the derivative of that map changes sign, the parametric graph folds into loops, oscillations or singularities. Different choices of the deformation function (hyperbolic, trigonometric, Jacobi elliptic, localized oscillations) and of the soliton parameters produce visibly different folded shapes, while the original solution values remain untouched. The construction is offered as a lightweight geometric framework for representing nonlocal waves on non-flat geometries, distinct from the higher-dimensional variable-separation or hodograph methods used for classical foldons. A sympathetic reader cares because many physical and biological waves live on folded surfaces; the paper supplies an elementary calculus tool that lets existing exact solutions be visualized in that setting.

Core claim

Whenever the spatial folding map X(ξ) = c + ξ + λ F(ξ) has a derivative that changes sign on an interval, the parametric surface (X(ξ), t, q(ξ, t)) built from an exact soliton solution q of a shifted nonlocal NLS or MKdV equation is non-injective and therefore exhibits a loop-type folded profile. The folding affects only the spatial parametrization; the underlying exact solution of the original equation is left unchanged. Suitable choices of the deformation function F and of the soliton and shift parameters generate regular loops, oscillating folds or singular structures.

What carries the argument

The folding map X(ξ) = c + ξ + λ F(ξ) together with the elementary sign-change criterion on X_ξ: if the continuous derivative changes sign then X is non-injective and the parametric graph (X(ξ), t, q(ξ, t)) is a loop-type folded profile.

Load-bearing premise

The paper treats a purely geometric reparametrization of the spatial coordinate as a meaningful framework for the shifted nonlocal equations even though the resulting folded graphs are explicitly not new solutions of those equations.

What would settle it

Take any concrete one-soliton solution listed in the paper, apply a folding map whose derivative never changes sign (for example |λ| small enough that X_ξ stays positive), and check whether a loop still appears; if a multi-valued profile forms without a sign change, the sufficient condition fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any exact solution of a shifted nonlocal NLS or MKdV equation can be turned into a multi-valued geometric profile by a non-monotonic spatial reparametrization.
  • The same elementary sign-change test applies uniformly to one-soliton and two-soliton solutions and to both real and complex shifted reductions.
  • Deformation parameters (amplitude, frequency, localization) control the number, size and visibility of loops independently of the soliton parameters.
  • Solution parameters can select regular, oscillatory or singular folded profiles from the same two-soliton formula.
  • The construction extends immediately to other shifted nonlocal models that already possess explicit exact solutions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Rewriting the original PDE in the new parameter ξ would produce a variable-coefficient or singular equation whose solutions are precisely the folded graphs; that deformed equation is left for future work but is the natural next object.
  • The same non-monotonic maps could be applied to breathers, rogue waves or higher-order solitons already known for these equations, yielding a catalogue of folded multi-soliton geometries.
  • Because the folding is purely geometric, the same technique applies to any (1+1)-dimensional wave equation that possesses an explicit solution, not only to the integrable shifted nonlocal family.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a simplified geometric construction of loop-type folded profiles for exact one- and two-soliton solutions of several shifted nonlocal NLS and MKdV equations previously obtained by the author. Starting from a known solution q(x,t), a non-monotonic spatial reparametrization x=X(ξ)=c+ξ+λF(ξ) is introduced; Proposition 2.1 states that a sign change of X_ξ is sufficient for non-injectivity of X and hence for a multi-valued parametric graph (X(ξ),t,q(ξ,t)). Explicit examples with hyperbolic, trigonometric, Jacobi elliptic and localized oscillatory folding maps are plotted for the real and complex shifted reductions, and the influence of the folding amplitude λ, the internal parameters of F, and the soliton parameters (k_j, δ_j, x_0, t_0) on the resulting regular, oscillating or singular loop geometries is illustrated. The author repeatedly emphasizes that the construction does not produce new solutions of the original PDEs, only geometric reparametrizations of already-known exact solutions.

Significance. The technical content is elementary real analysis applied to previously published soliton formulas; the resulting multi-valued graphs are correctly generated once the sign-change criterion is met. The work is carefully scoped: it does not claim new PDE solutions, and it distinguishes the pure reparametrization (X(ξ),q(ξ,t)) from the alternative that inserts X into the argument of q. Within the foldon literature the construction is a modest, transparent extension from (2+1)-dimensional variable-separation methods to (1+1)-dimensional shifted nonlocal equations. Its main value is illustrative and pedagogical rather than foundational; it supplies a concrete catalogue of how different folding maps and soliton parameters shape loop geometries, which may be of interest to readers working on geometric representations of nonlocal waves.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim is only that a sign-changing X_ξ produces multi-valued graphs of already-known solutions. While Proposition 2.1 is correct, the manuscript never supplies a dynamical or physical reason why these particular reparametrizations are natural for the shifted nonlocal equations themselves (beyond the formal analogy with foldons). Section 5 sketches a possible future derivation of deformed PDEs in the ξ-variable, but that step is left entirely open; without it the present work remains a collection of parametric plots rather than a framework that interacts with the nonlocal structure. A short, concrete illustration of how the original equation transforms under x=X(ξ) (even for one simple F) would substantially strengthen the claim that the construction is more than pure geometry.
  2. All soliton formulas are imported from Ref. [21] without re-derivation or independent verification. For the two-soliton case (Example 7) the explicit expression for |q|^{2} is omitted “due to complexity,” so the singular profile in Fig. 9(c) cannot be checked by the reader. At minimum the denominator zeros that produce the singularity should be stated analytically, and a reproducible notebook or supplementary file containing the plotted expressions should be provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and Introduction: “foldon” is used without a precise definition; a one-sentence reminder that foldons are elastic multi-valued localized structures would help non-specialists.
  2. Eq. (2.1) and subsequent examples: the centering choice c=x_0/2 is stated only for space-shifted reductions; a uniform statement covering the free-c cases would avoid ambiguity.
  3. Figures 1–10: axis labels and color scales are missing or low-resolution in the arXiv rendering; vector graphics or higher-resolution panels would improve readability.
  4. Typographical: “frame work” (Abstract), “profiles” (throughout), and occasional missing spaces after punctuation should be corrected.
  5. References [25]–[30] on biological/physical folding are cited only for motivation; a brief remark on whether any of those systems are modeled by the shifted nonlocal equations would clarify the intended physical link.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: elementary non-injectivity of a C1 map applied to independently obtained soliton solutions yields multi-valued graphs by construction, with transparent self-citation of prior solutions only as inputs.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3 opening paragraph and Eqs. (3.1)–(3.16); also Section 4 Eq. (4.1)]
    "In this part we shall use the one-soliton solutions of the shifted nonlocal NLS equations (1.3)–(1.7) and the shifted nonlocal MKdV equations (1.10)–(1.13) by Type 1 and Type 2 approaches obtained in [21]."

    The explicit soliton formulas that are subsequently folded are taken entirely from the author's own prior paper [21]. While the folding step itself is independent, the concrete profiles shown in all figures rest on this self-citation; the circularity is minor because [21] supplies only the input functions, not the geometric claim.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is Proposition 2.1 (Section 2): if X_ξ = 1 + λ F'(ξ) changes sign on an interval then X is non-injective, so the parametric graph (X(ξ), t, q(ξ, t)) is multi-valued (loop-type). This is a direct quotation of a standard elementary-analysis fact (cited to Rudin) and does not depend on any fitted quantity, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggled from the author's prior work. All explicit one- and two-soliton formulas (Eqs. (3.1), (3.4), (3.7), (3.11), (3.16), (4.1)) are imported from the author's earlier paper [21] via Type-1/Type-2 reductions of the AKNS system; those reductions are independent of the folding construction and are used only as fixed input functions q. The folding maps themselves (tanh, sin, sn, Gaussian-modulated cos, etc.) are chosen by hand and the paper repeatedly states (Abstract, Remark after Example 2, Conclusion) that the resulting graphs are geometric reparametrizations, not new solutions of the shifted nonlocal PDEs. No prediction is forced by a fit, no uniqueness is imported to forbid alternatives, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The sole self-citation is therefore non-load-bearing for the claimed geometric framework, producing only a minor score of 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on (i) the elementary calculus fact that a C^{1} map whose derivative changes sign is non-injective, (ii) the previously derived soliton solutions of the shifted nonlocal equations, and (iii) a collection of freely chosen folding functions and numerical parameters that generate the illustrated profiles. No new physical constants or dynamical entities are postulated; the free parameters are purely geometric and illustrative.

free parameters (3)
  • folding amplitude \lambda = e.g. -2, -3, -6
    Chosen by hand (typical values |\lambda|>1 or |\lambda|>1/m) so that X_\xi changes sign; controls the visibility and width of loops.
  • folding function F and its internal constants (m, \alpha, …)
    Ad-hoc choices (sin, tanh, sn(·,m), Gaussian-modulated cos, …) that determine the geometry of the folds; not derived from the PDE.
  • soliton wave numbers k_j, phases \delta_j, shift parameters x0,t0, coupling k
    Selected from the admissible ranges of the earlier soliton formulas to produce regular, oscillating or singular profiles; free within those ranges.
axioms (3)
  • standard math If a C^{1} map X:I\to R has a derivative that changes sign on I, then X is non-injective (standard real analysis).
    Invoked as Proposition 2.1; the sole mathematical engine of the folding construction.
  • domain assumption The one- and two-soliton formulas previously obtained by Type-1/Type-2 reductions of the coupled AKNS system under shifted nonlocal reductions are exact solutions of the listed shifted nonlocal NLS and MKdV equations.
    Taken as given from the author's earlier papers [21] and related works; used as input functions q(\xi,t).
  • ad hoc to paper A parametric graph (X(\xi),t,q(\xi,t)) with non-injective X is a legitimate 'loop-type folded profile' of the original solution even though it does not satisfy the original PDE.
    Definition introduced in Section 2; the paper explicitly disclaims that the folded graphs are new solutions.
invented entities (1)
  • loop-type folded profile (via non-monotonic spatial reparametrization of a (1+1)-dimensional solution) no independent evidence
    purpose: To give a geometric multi-valued representation of already-known exact solutions of shifted nonlocal NLS/MKdV equations.
    The entity is a definitional construct; it has no independent dynamical or physical existence outside the chosen reparametrization.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 18890 in / 3040 out tokens · 32758 ms · 2026-07-14T08:38:35.497136+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Based on the notion of foldon, we introduce a geometric framework for constructing folded parametric wave representations of exact solutions of some shifted nonlocal nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger and modified Korteweg-de Vries equations. Unlike the method of constructing loops in $(2+1)$-dimensional integrable models based on universal variable separation approach or hodograph transformation, we consider a simplified geometric approach of constructing loop-type folded profiles via non-monotonic parametrization of the spatial coordinate associated with the exact solution of the $(1+1)$-dimensional shifted nonlocal equations. A sufficient condition under which folding takes place is provided in the form of sign change of the derivative of folding map. Applying one- and two-soliton solutions of various shifted nonlocal nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger and modified Korteweg-de Vries equations found earlier, we show how different folding maps generate different loop-type folded profiles. In particular, we analyze the influence of deformation parameters and solution parameters on the geometry of folded waves. We show that the effect of the folding leads only to the modification of the spatial parametrization and generates various geometric structures like regular loop-type, oscillating-type, and singular-type folded profiles for certain values of parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10870 by Asl{\i} Pekcan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Folded profiles (X(ξ), q(ξ, t0)) for the real time reversal shifted nonlocal NLS equa￾tion (1.3) at t = t0 = −2 for (a) δ1 = −2, (b) δ1 = 0, (c) δ1 = 2. Graph (d) shows the corresponding folded surface for δ1 = 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Folded profiles (X(ξ), q(X(ξ), t0)) for the real time reversal shifted nonlocal NLS equation (1.3). (a) 3D graph, (b) 2D graph at t = t0 = −2. Note that the graph in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Folded profiles (X(ξ), q(ξ, t0)) for the real space-time reversal shifted nonlocal MKdV equation (1.10) at t = t0 = 1 for (a) x0 = −3, (b) x0 = 0, (c) x0 = 3. Graph (d) shows the corresponding folded surface for x0 = 3. Remark. In the case where the temporal shifting parameter t0 is changed rather than the spatial parameter x0, a similar behavior occurs for the folding profile, which means that t0 affects … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Profiles for the real space-time reversal shifted nonloc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Folded profiles (X(ξ), |q(ξ, 1)| 2 ) for the complex space reversal shifted nonlocal MKdV equation (1.11) for (a) m = 0.01, (b) m = 0.75, (c) m = 0.99. The folded form becomes more distinct for the value of m equal to 0.75. In the cases when m equals 0.01 and 0.99, the fold pattern becomes much less visible. This is due to the fact that in case of m approaching 0 and 1, the Jacobi elliptic function sn beco… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Solution for the complex space reversal shifted nonlocal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: illustrates the effect of the values of the α and m on the folded profiles for the complex time reversal shifted nonlocal NLS (1.6). (a) (b) (c) (d) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Folded profiles (X(ξ), q(ξ, t0)) for the complex space-time reversal shifted nonlocal MKdV (1.13) at t = t0 = 1 for (a) m = 2. (b) m = 4. (c) m = 6. Graph (d) shows the corresponding folded surface for m = 6. Here the parameter m controls the oscillatory frequency of the folding. By increasing the value of m, an increase in the number of folds is achieved in the same region. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Folded profiles (X(ξ), |q(ξ, 1)| 2 ) derived from the two-soliton solution of (1.11) for (a) k1 = 1 2 i, k2 = 1 4 i, (b) k1 = i, k2 = 1 4 i, (c) k1 = i, k2 = 2i. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Solution for the complex space reversal shifted nonloca [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references

  1. [1]

    M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Integrable nonlocal nonlinear S chr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 064105, 2013

  2. [2]

    M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Inverse scattering transfor m for the integrable nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinearity 29, 915–946, 2016

  3. [3]

    M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Integrable nonlocal nonlinear e quations, Stud. Appl. Math. 139 (1), 7–59, 2016

  4. [4]

    Ablowitz, B.F

    M.J. Ablowitz, B.F. Feng, X.D. Luo, and Z.H. Musslimani, Inverse sca ttering transform for the nonlocal reverse space-time nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa tion, Theor. Math. Phys. 196(3), 1241–1267, 2018

  5. [5]

    A. S. Fokas, Integrable multidimensional versions of the nonloca l Schr¨ odinger equation, Nonlinearity 29, 319, 2016

  6. [6]

    J. L. Ji and Z. N. Zhu, On a nonlocal modified Korteweg-de Vries e quation: Integrability, Darboux transformation and soliton solutions, Commun. Nonlinear S ci. Numer. Simulat. 42, 699, 2017

  7. [7]

    J. L. Ji and Z. N. Zhu, Soliton solutions of an integrable nonlocal m odified Korteweg-de Vries equation through inverse scattering transform, J. Math. A nal. Appl. 453, 973, 2017

  8. [8]

    V. S. Gerdjikov and A. Saxena, Complete integrability of nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Math. Phys. 58(1), 013502, 2017

  9. [9]

    L. Y. Ma, S. F. Shen, and Z. N. Zhu, Soliton solution and gauge equ ivalence for an integrable nonlocal complex modified Korteweg-de Vries equation J. Math. Phys. 58, 103501, 2017

  10. [10]

    B. F. Feng, X. D. Luo, M. J. Ablowitz, and Z. H. Musslimani, Gener al soliton solution to a nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with zero and nonzer o boundary conditions, Nonlinearity 31(12), 5385–5409, 2018

  11. [11]

    G¨ urses and A

    M. G¨ urses and A. Pekcan, Nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger eq uations and their soliton solutions, J. Math. Phys. 59, 051501, 2018

  12. [12]

    S. Y. Lou, Alice-Bob systems, ˆP − ˆT − ˆC symmetry invariant and symmetry breaking soliton solutions, J. Math. Phys. 59, 083507, 2018

  13. [13]

    G¨ urses and A

    M. G¨ urses and A. Pekcan, Nonlocal nonlinear modified KdV equa tions and their soliton solutions, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 67, 427–448, 2019. 16

  14. [14]

    Yang, General N-solitons and their dynamics in several nonlo cal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Phys

    J. Yang, General N-solitons and their dynamics in several nonlo cal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Phys. Lett A 383(4), 328–337, 2019

  15. [15]

    Zhang and Z

    G. Zhang and Z. Yan, Inverse scattering transforms and solit on solutions of focusing and defocusing nonlocal mKdV equations with nonzero boundary co nditions, Phys. D 402, 132170, 2020

  16. [16]

    W. X. Ma, Inverse scattering for nonlocal reverse-time nonlin ear Schr¨ odinger equations, Appl. Math. Lett. 102, 106161, 2020

  17. [17]

    W. X. Ma, Soliton hierarchies and soliton solutions of type ( − λ ⋆, − λ) reduced nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations of arbitrary even order, Partial Dif. Equ. Appl. Math. 7, 100515, 2023

  18. [18]

    S. Y. Lou, Multi-place physics and multi-place nonlocal systems, Commun. Theoret. Phys. 72, 057001, 2020

  19. [19]

    M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Integrable space-time shifte d nonlocal nonlinear equations, Phys. Lett. A 409, 127516, 2021

  20. [20]

    M. J. Ablowitz, Z. H. Musslimani, and N. J. Ossi, Inverse scatter ing transform for continuous and discrete space-time shifted integrable equations, Stud. Appl. Math. 153(4), e12764, 2024

  21. [21]

    G¨ urses and A

    M. G¨ urses and A. Pekcan, Soliton solutions of the shifted nonlo cal NLS and MKdV equations, Phys. Lett. A 422, 127793, 2022

  22. [22]

    Baylı and A

    S. Baylı and A. Pekcan, Shifted nonlocal reductions of 5-comp onent Maccari system, Phys. Scr. 101 (1), 015201, 2026

  23. [23]

    S. Y. Lou and F. Huang, Alice-Bob physics: Coherent solutions o f nonlocal KdV systems, Sci. Rep. 7, Art. No. 869, 2017

  24. [24]

    M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, and H. Segur, The invers e scattering transform-Fourier analysis for nonlinear problems, Stud. Appl. Ma th. 53(4), 249–315, 1974

  25. [25]

    C. B. Anfinsen, Principles that govern the folding of protein cha ins, 181(4096), 223–230, 1973

  26. [26]

    K. A. Dill and J. L. MacCallum, The protein-folding problem, 50 yea rs on, 338(6110), 1042–1046, 2012

  27. [27]

    D. C. Van Essen, A tension-based theory of morphogenesis an d compact wiring in the central nervous system, Nature 385, 313–318, 1997. 17

  28. [28]

    P. V. Bayly, L. A. Taber, and C. D. Kroenke, Mechanical force s in cerebral cortical folding: A review of measurements and models, J. Mech. Behav. Biom ed. Mater. 29, 568– 581, 2014

  29. [29]

    Cerda and L

    E. Cerda and L. Mahadevan, Geometry and physics of wrinkling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(7), 074302, 2003

  30. [30]

    T. A. Witten, Stress focusing in elastic sheets, Rev. Mod. Phys . 79, 643, 2007

  31. [31]

    X. Y. Tang, S. Y. Lou, and Y. Zhang, Localized excitations in (2 + 1)-dimensional systems Phys. Rev. E 66, 046601, 2002

  32. [32]

    S. Y. Lou, C. L. Chen, and X. Y. Tang, (2 + 1)-dimensional (M+N )-component AKNS system: Painlev´ e integrability, infinitely many symmetries, similarity reductions and exact solutions, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4078, 2002

  33. [33]

    X. Y. Tang and S. Y. Lou, Folded solitary waves and foldons in (2 + 1) dimensions, Commun. Theor. Phys. 40, 62-66, 2003

  34. [34]

    J. F. Zhang, Z. M. Lu, and Y. L. Liu, Folded solitary waves and fo ldons in the (2 + 1)- dimensional long dispersive wave equation, Z. Naturforsch. 58a, 280–284, 2003

  35. [35]

    W. H. Huang and J. F. Zhang, Folded localized excitations of the M accari system, Acta Phys. Pol. B, 35(8), 2051–2058, 2004

  36. [36]

    C. L. Zheng, L. Q. Chen, and J. F. Zhang, Multi-valued solitary- waves in multidimen- sional soliton systems, Chin. Phys. B, 13(5), 592–597, 2004

  37. [37]

    C. L. Bai and H. Zhao, New localized coherent structures to th e dispersive long-wave equation in (2 + 1)-dimensional space, Chin. J. Phys. 43(3)-I, 400–407, 2005

  38. [38]

    C. L. Bai and H. Zhao, New localized structures of a (2+1)-dime nsional system obtained by variable separation approach, Eur. Phys. J. B 44, 543–550, 2005

  39. [39]

    W. H. Huang, Periodic folded waves for a (2 + 1)-dimensional mod ified dispersive water wave eqaution, Chin. Phys. B, 18(8), 3163–3168, 2009

  40. [40]

    Y. Lei, S. H. Ma, and J. P. Fang, Folded localized excitations in the (2 + 1)-dimensional modified dispersive water-wave system, Chin. Phys. B 22(1), 010506, 2013

  41. [41]

    L. Li, Y. Yan, and Y. Xie, Localized excitation and folded solitary w ave for an extended (3+1)-dimensional B-type Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, Non linear Dyn. 109, 2013- 2027, 2022

  42. [42]

    D. Wu, J. Zhao, M. Zhu, L. Li, and H. Zheng, Non-compatible fully symmetric Davey–Stewartson system: Localized excitation and folded solitar y wave, Results Phys. 60, 107668, 2024. 18

  43. [43]

    Matsuno, Multiloop soliton and multibreather solutions of the s hort pulse model equation, J

    Y. Matsuno, Multiloop soliton and multibreather solutions of the s hort pulse model equation, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76(8), 084003, 2007

  44. [44]

    Stalin and M

    S. Stalin and M. Senthilvelan, Multi-loop soliton solutions and their in teraction in the Degasperis-Procesi equation, Phys. Scr. 86, 015006, 2012

  45. [45]

    Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis

    W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis. 3rd Edition, McGra w-Hill, New York, 1976. 19