Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Convex envelope method for T, p flash calculations for mixtures with an arbitrary number of components and arbitrary aggregate states

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper extends the convex envelope method for T,p flash calculations to mixtures where vapor and solid phases can coexist, so the number of phases and their aggregate states are determined automatically.

desk verdict A useful, sound extension of the convex envelope method for VLE/SLE up to quaternary mixtures, but the abstract's 'any phase equilibrium' overclaims given the pure-component-only solid model. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09402 v2 pith:BDKN4N2P submitted 2025-02-13 physics.chem-ph

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords convexenvelopemethodTpflashcalculationphaseequilibriumtangentplanecriterionvapor-liquidsolid-liquidGibbsenergyofmixingNRTLparameterfitting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the convex envelope method (CEM) for T,p flash calculations from liquid-only systems to mixtures in which vapor and solid phases can also coexist. The central claim is that by computing the Gibbs energy of mixing for every conceivable aggregate state over a discretized composition space and taking the convex envelope of the combined graph, the phase equilibrium can be obtained for any feed without specifying in advance how many phases form or what they are. The method thus turns the flash calculation into a two-step process: a one-time, possibly expensive construction of a piecewise-linear phase diagram, followed by essentially immediate phase-split answers for any feed composition. The authors validate the approach against literature data for vapor-liquid and solid-liquid equilibria with up to four components, report mean deviations below 0.02, and demonstrate the same machinery for fitting NRTL parameters. If the claim holds, phase-equilibrium calculations for process simulation no longer need a starting guess for the number or type of phases.

What carries the argument

The central object is the convex envelope of the combined graph G = {(a, Δg_mix,s(x)) | x in discretization D, s in {solid, liquid, vapor}} ⊆ $R^{{n+1}}$, where a is the cartesian coordinate of composition x and Δg_mix,s is the Gibbs energy of mixing of aggregate state s. Phase splits are identified by 'heterogeneous simplices' of this envelope: simplices containing a line segment that either connects non-neighboring grid points (the classic LLE criterion) or connects points of different aggregate states (the new generalization). The envelope is constructed with a standard convex-hull algorithm, and once stored, any feed composition is answered by locating the simplex containing it and solving a tiny linear problem. The solid-phase model, given as a linear interpolation of pure-component melting terms, keeps solid phases pinned to pure-component vertices.

What would settle it

Run the method on a binary system with a well-documented solid solution (e.g., KCl–KBr) at a temperature where the solid solution exists; the linear solid model produces no solid phase of intermediate composition, so the calculated solid-liquid equilibrium will miss the solid-solution region entirely, whereas the experimental diagram shows it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is a generalization of the tangent-plane criterion: instead of separating phases one aggregate state at a time, the method builds one convex envelope over the Gibbs energy of mixing graphs of liquid, vapor, and solid phases simultaneously. A phase split is recognized whenever the convex envelope connects two points that are either non-neighboring in the composition grid or belong to different aggregate states. For a solid phase the paper assumes the Gibbs energy of mixing is linear in composition, so solids occur only at pure-component vertices; with that model in hand, the convex envelope of the combined graph yields any number of coexisting phases, their aggregate states, and their compositions for any feed, with no prior knowledge of the phase split. This extends the mathematical framework that was proven for liquid phases in prior work to arbitrary aggregate states.

Load-bearing premise

The solid-phase Gibbs energy of mixing is assumed to be linear in composition, so solid phases can appear only as pure components; if a system forms solid solutions or compounds, the convex envelope built from this model will not capture them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • T,p flash calculations can be performed for any feed without a prior guess of the number or type of phases, removing a common failure mode in process simulation.
  • The same framework covers VLE, LLE, SLE, VLLE, and combinations thereof, so unified phase-diagram construction replaces separate case-by-case solvers.
  • The method can fit gE-model parameters directly against phase-equilibrium data (e.g., NRTL), because the flash result is a continuous function of the model parameters.
  • Combined with predictive property models, the CEM can construct complete T,x,y diagrams from molecular structure alone, enabling solvent and process design without experimental parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: if the linear-solid assumption is lifted, the convex-envelope framework should extend to solid solutions and stoichiometric compounds, because the machinery only needs a computable g(T,p,x) for every point in composition space.
  • My inference: the decoupling of expensive hull construction from fast flash evaluation suggests the method could serve as a precomputed thermodynamic library for real-time flowsheet optimization, including in reinforcement-learning process design.
  • My inference: the reported missing feeds near azeotropes are a discretization artifact; adaptive refinement of the composition grid near multiphase boundaries could presumably eliminate them without the cost of global fine grids.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper extends the convex envelope method (CEM) of Göttl et al. (2023) to T,p flash calculations that can, in principle, consider liquid, vapor, and solid aggregate states simultaneously. The method discretizes the composition simplex, evaluates the molar Gibbs energy of mixing for each phase model at every grid point, constructs the convex envelope of the union of these graphs, classifies heterogeneous simplices, and then computes phase splits for arbitrary feed compositions by a linear problem. Numerical demonstrations cover binary, ternary, and quaternary VLE and SLE systems using literature NRTL parameters, a differential-evolution-based NRTL parameter-fitting procedure, and a proof-of-concept combination with the HANNA machine-learning activity-coefficient model. The authors claim that the method computes any phase equilibrium of a mixture with arbitrary number of components and phases over the whole composition space without prior knowledge of the phase split.

Significance. If the central claim were fully supported, the paper would offer a robust and initialization-free alternative to conventional flash algorithms, particularly attractive for process synthesis because the expensive convex-hull construction is decoupled from the fast per-feed phase-split query. The paper has concrete strengths: the algorithm avoids nonlinear solves and is deterministic; the implementation is open source; the method has no fitted parameters of its own beyond the discretization parameter δ; and the HANNA example demonstrates a pathway from molecular structure to complete phase diagrams. The reported errors for the studied systems are small, and the method reproduces literature SLE/VLE topology, including multiphase regions. However, the significance is moderated by the fact that the main claimed generality rests on a solid-phase model that only stabilizes pure-component solids, and by validation that mostly compares literature-fitted models to the data used to fit them.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section 4] The abstract's claim that 'any phase equilibrium ... can be calculated over the whole composition space' is not supported by the demonstrated implementation. Equation (5) defines Δg_mix,solid as an affine function of composition, which has zero curvature and therefore cannot produce stable solid phases at interior compositions. Consequently, solid solutions, congruently melting compounds, and solid solvates are excluded, as the authors acknowledge in Section 4 ('only pure components are allowed to form solid phases'). The sentence after Eq. (5) stating that the method works for more complex thermodynamics as long as g(T,p,x) is computable rescues the framework but not the paper's central claim, because all quantitative results use Eq. (5). Please revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusion to distinguish the algorithmic framework (which can accept arbitrary phase models) from the implemented and validated special case (pure-component solids), or add demonstrations with a nonlinear solid-phase model.
  2. [Section 2.2; Section 4; Tables 1-7] The 'whole composition space' claim is also qualified by the finite discretization. Tables 1, 4, 6, and 7 report missing feeds (MF) near azeotropes and multiphase boundaries, and Section 4 states that interpolation errors cannot be fully eliminated. The paper should either characterize these missing feeds quantitatively (for example, by reporting the distance to the phase boundary or by a discretization-refinement study) or soften the claim to 'approximate phase equilibria computed on a discretized grid.' As written, the abstract and Section 5 overstate the completeness of the calculation.
  3. [Section 3.2; Eq. (10)] The quantitative validation conflates the accuracy of the CEM with the accuracy of the underlying NRTL models. The MD values in Tables 1–7 compare CEM outputs, obtained with literature-fitted NRTL parameters, to the same experimental data that were used to fit those parameters; they therefore mainly measure the model–data mismatch, not the error introduced by the convex-envelope construction. To support the claim of high accuracy of the method itself, the paper should compare CEM results against a reference flash algorithm (for example, Michelsen stability analysis plus phase-split calculation) using identical thermodynamic parameters, or explicitly restrict the claimed accuracy to agreement with the underlying models and the literature data.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1] The phrase 'One the other hand' should read 'On the other hand.'
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption contains 'methyl M TBE'; this should be 'MTBE.'
  3. [Section 3.1] The sentence describing Figure 3 c) and d) contains the garbled phrase 'at 303.15 K in is given in c)'; it needs grammatical correction.
  4. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'deducing a high accuracy' should read 'indicating a high accuracy,' and 'mising feeds' should be 'missing feeds.'
  5. [Table 8] In the methanol–toluene row, the reported value A12 = 3.348 × 10^37 appears inconsistent with the other fitted values and likely represents an unphysical optimum or a typographical error; please verify this entry.
  6. [Eq. (9)] The symbol T is used both for temperature and for the set of data points in Eq. (9); please introduce distinct notation to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the CEM derivation is self-contained; self-citations and in-sample validation are not definitional reductions.

full rationale

The central derivation is an algorithmic application of the Gibbs tangent-plane criterion: given models g(T,p,x) in Eqs. (1)-(5), the CEM constructs the convex envelope of the discretized Gibbs-energy graphs and classifies simplices as phase splits. This is a direct computational implementation of the minimization of G, not a quantity defined in terms of the target result. Equation (5) is an explicitly stated modeling assumption (pure-component solids) whose limitation is acknowledged in Section 4; it narrows the scope of the demonstrated solid-phase results but does not make the solid-liquid calculation circular. The repeated citations to Göttl et al. (2023) invoke a previously published mathematical framework and are supplemented here by independent numerical examples and an open-source implementation; no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternative methods. Quantitative comparisons use literature-fitted activity-coefficient models against literature experimental data, so the MD values chiefly validate the implementation rather than providing out-of-sample prediction, but the paper does not claim otherwise and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. No derivation step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central method introduces no new free parameters beyond the grid resolution and no new physical entities. The load-bearing assumptions are the tangent plane criterion, the given thermodynamic models, the linear pure-component solid model, and the discretization convergence assumption.

free parameters (1)
  • Discretization parameter delta = 256 (binary), 128 (ternary), 64 (quaternary) as used in this work
    Grid resolution for sampling the composition space. Controls the approximation error of the convex envelope; chosen by the authors, not derived from theory. The abstract's claim of calculating phase equilibria over the whole composition space depends on this finite grid.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Tangent plane criterion: a phase split is stable iff the convex envelope of the Gibbs energy lies below the Gibbs energy graph.
    Invoked in Sections 1 and 2.1 to justify identifying phase splits with facets of the convex envelope.
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic models for each phase (gE model, ideal vapor, pure-component solid) are given and accurate enough.
    Section 2.2 assumes g = g(T,p,x) is available for all phases; the quality of the phase equilibrium depends entirely on these inputs.
  • ad hoc to paper Solid phase Gibbs energy of mixing is linear in composition (Eq. 5), allowing solid phases only at pure-component endpoints.
    Section 2.2, Eq. 5. This excludes solid solutions and compounds, limiting the claimed generality to systems where only pure solids appear.
  • domain assumption Ideal vapor phase and negligible pressure dependence of condensed-phase Gibbs energies (Eqs. 2-3).
    Section 2.2, Eqs. 2-3. Standard low-pressure VLE assumptions; the method would need modification for high-pressure or non-ideal vapor behavior.
  • domain assumption Discrete convex envelope converges to the true convex envelope as delta increases.
    Section 2.2 Steps I-II and Section 4. The paper does not prove convergence or quantify discretization error; it relies on prior work (Göttl et al. 2023).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Convex envelope method for T, p flash calculations for mixtures with an arbitrary number of components and arbitrary aggregate states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BDKN4N2P

@misc{pith2026250209402,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Convex envelope method for T, p flash calculations for mixtures with an arbitrary number of components and arbitrary aggregate states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BDKN4N2P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09402}
}
abstract

$T, p$ flash calculations determine the correct number of phases at phase equilibrium and their compositions for fixed temperature and pressure. They are essential for chemical process simulation and optimization. The convex envelope method (CEM) is an existing approach that employs the tangent plane criterion to determine liquid phase equilibria for mixtures with an arbitrary number of components without providing the number of phases beforehand. This work extends the CEM to include also vapor and solid phases. Thus, any phase equilibrium of a given mixture with an arbitrary number of components and phases can be calculated over the whole composition space. The CEM results are presented for various vapor-liquid and solid-liquid phase equilibria examples of up to four components. We show how the CEM can be used for parameter fitting of $g^E$-models. As an outlook, we demonstrate how the CEM can be combined with a machine learning-based tool for property prediction to construct phase equilibria.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09402 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The concept of the convex envelope method is illustrated for an LLE in a), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Binary and ternary VLEs of a) methanol – benzene (313.15 K) b) methyl acetate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Binary and ternary SLEs of a) chloroform – acetylacetone (1.0133 bar), b) 3,4- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: T, x, y-diagram for the binary mixture butanol – water ranging from SLE, over LLE, over VLLE, to VLE. The activity coefficients were predicted using the HANNA￾model (Specht et al., 2024). Antoine parameters, melting temperatures, and melting heats were taken from (Lins…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , year 2012

    author Afanasyev, A.A. , year 2012 . title Simulation of the properties of a binary carbon dioxide–water mixture under sub- and supercritical conditions . journal Thermophysical Properties of Materials volume 50 , pages 340--347

  2. [2]

    , year 2022

    author Arroyave, R. , year 2022 . title Phase stability through machine learning . journal J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. volume 43 , pages 606--628

  3. [3]

    , author Pierce, A

    author Baker, L. , author Pierce, A. , author Luks, K. , year 1982 . title Gibbs energy analysis of phase equilibria . journal Soc. Pet. Eng. J. volume 22 , pages 731--742

  4. [4]

    , author Dobkin, D

    author Barber, C. , author Dobkin, D. , author Huhdanpaa, H. , year 1996 . title The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls . journal Mathematical Software volume 22 , pages 469--483

  5. [5]

    , author Rangaiah, G

    author Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. , author Rangaiah, G. , author Segovia-Hernandez, J. , year 2011 . title Constrained and unconstrained gibbs free energy minimization in reactive systems using genetic algorithm and differential evolution with tabu list . journal Fluid Ph. Equilibria volume 300 , pages 120--134

  6. [6]

    , author Gubbins, K

    author Chapman, W. , author Gubbins, K. , author Jackson, G. , author Radosz, M. , year 1989 . title Saft: Equation-of-state solution model for associating fluids . journal Fluid Ph. Equilibria volume 52 , pages 31--38

  7. [7]

    , author Suganthan, P

    author Das, S. , author Suganthan, P. , year 2011 . title Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of-the-art . journal IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation volume 15 , pages 4--31

  8. [8]

    , year 2019

    author Domanska, U. , year 2019 . title Experimental data of fluid phase equilibria correlation and prediction models: A review . journal processes volume 7

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    , year 1941

    author Flory, P. , year 1941 . title Thermodynamics of high polymer solutions . journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 9 , pages 660

  2. [10]

    , author Zhang, F

    author Gao, X. , author Zhang, F. , author Yu, Y. , author Dou, Y. , author Xu, L. , author Liu, G. , year 2018 . title Solid-liquid phase equilibria of the ternary system (2-naphthaldehyde + 4-methylphthalic anhydride + ethyl acetate) at (288.15, 298.15, and 308.15) k . journ...

  3. [11]

    , year 1873

    author Gibbs, J. , year 1873 . title A method of geometrical representation of the thermodynamic properties of substances by means of surfaces . journal Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. volume 2 , pages 382--404

  4. [12]

    , year 1876

    author Gibbs, J. , year 1876 . title On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances . journal Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. volume 3 , pages 108--248

  5. [13]

    , author Pirnay, J

    author Göttl, Q. , author Pirnay, J. , author Burger, J. , author Grimm, D. , year 2024 . title Deep reinforcement learning enables conceptual design of processes for separating azeotropic mixtures without prior knowledge . journal Comput. Chem. Eng. , pages 108975

  6. [14]

    , author Pirnay, J

    author Göttl, Q. , author Pirnay, J. , author Grimm, D.G. , author Burger, J. , year 2023 . title Convex envelope method for determining liquid multi-phase equilibria in systems with arbitrary number of components . journal Comput. Chem. Eng. volume 177

  7. [15]

    , author Tönges, Y

    author Göttl, Q. , author Tönges, Y. , author Grimm, D. , author Burger, J. , year 2021 . title Automated flowsheet synthesis using hierarchical reinforcement learning: Proof of concept . journal Chem. Ing. Tech. volume 93 , pages 2010--2018

  8. [16]

    , author Glasser, D

    author Hildebrandt, D. , author Glasser, D. , year 1994 . title Predicting phase and chemical equilibrium using the convex hull of the gibbs free energy . journal Chem. Eng. J. Biom. Eng. J. volume 54 , pages 187--197

  9. [17]

    , year 1941

    author Huggins, M. , year 1941 . title Solutions of Long Chain Compounds . journal J. Chem. Phys. volume 9 , pages 440

  10. [18]

    , author Sands, C.M

    author Joseph, A. , author Sands, C.M. , author Hicks, P.D. , author Chandler, H.W. , year 2017 . title Convex hull method for the determination of vapour-liquid equilibria (vle) phase diagrams for binary and ternary systems . journal Fluid Phase Equilibria volume 431 , pages 34--47

  11. [19]

    , author Park, S.J

    author Kim, J.I. , author Park, S.J. , author Choi, Y.Y. , author Kim, S.B. , year 2011 . title Liquid-liquid equilibrium, solid-liquid equilibrium, densities, and refractivity of a water, chloroform, and acetylacetone mixture . journal J. Chem. Eng. Data volume 56 , pages 1798--1803

  12. [20]

    , author Kessler, T

    author Kunde, C. , author Kessler, T. , author Linke, S. , author McBride, K. , author Sundmacher, K. , author Kienle, A. , year 2019 . title Surrogate modeling for liquid–liquid equilibria using a parameterization of the binodal curve . journal Processes volume 753

  13. [21]

    , author Jensen, K

    author Lansford, J. , author Jensen, K. , author Barnes, B. , year 2023 . title Physics-informed transfer learning for out-of-sample vapor pressure predictions . journal Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. volume 48

  14. [22]

    , author Choy, J

    author Lee, D. , author Choy, J. , author Lee, J. , year 1992 . title Computer generation of binary and ternary phase diagrams via a convex hull method . journal J. of Phase Equilibria volume 13 , pages 365--372

  15. [23]

    , author Han, S

    author Li, R. , author Han, S. , author Du, C. , author Meng, L. , author Wang, J. , author Zhao, H. , year 2016 . title Measurement and calculation of solid–liquid equilibrium for ternary systems of 3,4-dichloronitrobenzene+2,3-dichloronitrobenzene+ethanol/n-propanol . journa...

  16. [24]

    , author Wang, M

    author Li, X. , author Wang, M. , author Du, C. , author Cong, Y. , author Zhao, H. , year 2017 . title Determination and correlation of solid-liquid phase equilibrium and phase diagram for multicomponent system of mixed dibasic acids. (iv) quaternary system of (adipic acid + ...

  17. [25]

    , author Mallard, W

    author Linstrom, P. , author Mallard, W. , year 2024 . title NIST Chemistry WebBook . publisher NIST Standard Reference Database

  18. [26]

    , author DiMaggio, P

    author Lucia, A. , author DiMaggio, P. , author Bellows, M. , author Octavio, L. , year 2005 . title The phase behavior of n-alkane systems . journal Comput. Chem. Eng. volume 29 , pages 2363--2379

  19. [27]

    , author Feng, Y

    author Lucia, A. , author Feng, Y. , year 2002 . title Global terrain methods . journal Comput. Chem. Eng. volume 26 , pages 529--546

  20. [28]

    , author Feng, Y

    author Lucia, A. , author Feng, Y. , year 2003 . title Multivariable terrain methods . journal AIChE Journal volume 49 , pages 2553--2563

  21. [29]

    , author Padmanabhan, L

    author Lucia, A. , author Padmanabhan, L. , author Venkataraman, S. , year 2000 . title Multiphase equilibrium flash calculations . journal Comput. Chem. Eng. volume 24 , pages 2557--2569

  22. [30]

    , author Kuldinow, D

    author Mao, S. , author Kuldinow, D. , author Haataja, M.P. , author Kosmrlj, A. , year 2019 . title Phase behavior and morphology of multicomponent liquid mixtures . journal Soft Matter volume 15 , pages 1297--1311

  23. [31]

    , author Sundmacher, K

    author McBride, K. , author Sundmacher, K. , year 2019 . title Overview of surrogate modeling in chemical process engineering . journal Chem. Ing. Tech. volume 91 , pages 1--13

  24. [32]

    , year 1982 a

    author Michelsen, M. , year 1982 a. title The isothermal flash problem. part i. stability . journal Fluid Ph. Equilibria volume 9 , pages 1--19

  25. [33]

    , year 1982 b

    author Michelsen, M. , year 1982 b. title The isothermal flash problem. part ii. phase-split calculation . journal Fluid Ph. Equilibria volume 9 , pages 21--40

  26. [34]

    , author Barton, P

    author Mitsos, A. , author Barton, P. , year 2007 . title A dual extremum principle in thermodynamics . journal AICHE Journal volume 53 , pages 2131--2147

  27. [35]

    , author Han, K.J

    author Oh, J.H. , author Han, K.J. , author Won, D.B. , author Park, S.J. , year 2003 . title Vapor–liquid equilibria for the ternary systems of methyl tert-butyl ether + methanol + benzene and methyl tert-butyl ether + methanol + toluene and constituent binary systems at 313....

  28. [36]

    , author Reyes-Labarta, J

    author Olaya, M. , author Reyes-Labarta, J. , author Serrano, M. , author Marcilla, A. , year 2010 . title Vapor-liquid equilibria using the gibbs energy and the common tangent plane criterion . journal Chemical Engineering Education volume 44 , pages 236

  29. [37]

    , author Robinson, D

    author Peng, D. , author Robinson, D. , year 1976 . title A new two-constant equation of state . journal Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamen. volume 15 , pages 59--64

  30. [38]

    , author Jackson, G

    author Pereira, F.E. , author Jackson, G. , author Galindo, A. , author S., A.C. , year 2010 . title A duality-based optimisation approach for the reliable solution of (p, t) phase equilibrium in volume-composition space . journal Fluid Phase Equilibria volume 299 , pages 1--23

  31. [39]

    , author Appolaire, B

    author Perevoshchikova, N. , author Appolaire, B. , author Teixeira, J. , author Aeby-Gautier, E. , author Denis, S. , year 2012 . title A convex hull algorithm for a grid minimization of gibbs energy as initial step in equilibrium calculations in two-phase multicomponent allo...

  32. [40]

    , author Simunovic, S

    author Piro, M. , author Simunovic, S. , year 2016 . title Global optimization algorithms to compute thermodynamic equilibria in large complex systems with performance considerations . journal Comput. Mater. Sci. volume 118 , pages 87--96

  33. [41]

    , author Lichtenthaler, R

    author Prausnitz, J. , author Lichtenthaler, R. , author Azevedo, E. , year 1999 . title Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria . publisher Prentice Hall PTR

  34. [42]

    , author Conesa, J

    author Reyes, J. , author Conesa, J. , author Marcilla, A. , author Olaya, M. , year 2001 . title Solid-liquid equilibrium thermodynamics: Checking stability in multiphase systems using the gibbs energy function . journal Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. volume 40 , pages 902--907

  35. [43]

    , author Swinton, F

    author Rowlinson, J. , author Swinton, F. , year 1982 . title Liquids and Liquid Mixtures . publisher Butterworth-Heinemann

  36. [44]

    , year 2009

    author Ryll, O. , year 2009 . title Thermodynamische Analyse gekoppelter Reaktions-Destillations-Prozesse: konzeptioneller Entwurf, Modellierung, Simulation und experimentelle Validierung (in German) . Ph.D. thesis. University of Stuttgart. address Stuttgart, Germany

  37. [45]

    , author Blagov, S

    author Ryll, O. , author Blagov, S. , author Hasse, H. , year 2012 . title Convex envelope method for the determination of fluid phase diagrams . journal Fluid Ph. Equilibria volume 324 , pages 108--116

  38. [46]

    , author Rebello, C

    author Santana, V. , author Rebello, C. , author Queiroz, L. , author Ribeiro, A. , author Shardt, N. , author Nogueira, I. , year 2024 . title Puffin: A path-unifying feed-forward interfaced network for vapor pressure prediction . journal Chem. Eng. Sci. volume 286 , pages 119623

  39. [47]

    , year 1972

    author Soave, G. , year 1972 . title Equilibrium constants from a modified redlich–kwong equation of state . journal Chem. Eng. Sci. volume 27 , pages 1197--1203

  40. [48]

    , author Magnussen, T

    author Sorensen, J. , author Magnussen, T. , author Rasmussen, P. , author Fredenslund, A. , year 1979 . title Liquid-liquid equilibrium data: Their retrieval, correlation and prediction, part ii: Correlation . journal Fluid Ph. Equilibria volume 3 , pages 47--82

  41. [49]

    , author Nagda, M

    author Specht, T. , author Nagda, M. , author Fellenz, S. , author Mandt, A. , author Hasse, H. , author Jirasek, F. , year 2024 . title Hanna: hard-constraint neural network for consistent activity coefficient prediction . journal Chem. Sci. volume 15 , pages 19777

  42. [50]

    , author Zhao, Z

    author Sun, G. , author Zhao, Z. , author Sun, S. , author Ma, Y. , author Li, H. , author Gao, X. , year 2023 . title Vapor-liquid phase equilibria behavior prediction of binary mixtures using machine learning . journal Chem. Eng. Sc. volume 282 , pages 119358

  43. [51]

    , author Mullins, J

    author Swank, D. , author Mullins, J. , year 1986 . title Evaluation of methods for calculating liquid-liquid phase-splitting . journal Fluid Ph. Equilibria volume 30 , pages 101--110

  44. [52]

    , author Rangaiah, G

    author Teh, Y. , author Rangaiah, G. , year 2002 . title A study of equation-solving and gibbs free energy minimization methods for phase equilibrium calculations . journal Chem. Eng. Res. Des. volume 80 , pages 759

  45. [53]

    , author Gommers, R

    author Virtanen, P. , author Gommers, R. , author Oliphant, T. , author Haberland, M. , author Reddy, T. , author Cournapeau, D. , author Burovski, E. , author Peterson, P. , author Weckesser, W. , author Bright, J. , author Walt, S. , author Brett, M. , author Wilson, J. , au...

  46. [54]

    , author Li, Y

    author Wasylkiewicz, S. , author Li, Y. , author Satyro, M. , author Wasylkiewicz, M. , year 2013 . title Application of a global optimization algorithm to phase stability and liquid–liquid equilibrium calculations . journal Fluid Ph. Equilibria volume 358 , pages 304--318

  47. [55]

    , author Wang, Q.l

    author Xiao, L. , author Wang, Q.l. , author Wang, H.x. , author Qiu, T. , year 2013 . title Isobaric vapor–liquid equilibrium data for the binary system methyl acetate+isopropyl acetate and the quaternary system methyl acetate+methanol+isopropanol+isopropyl acetate at 101.3kp...

  48. [56]

    , author Bonilla-Petriciolet, A

    author Zhang, H. , author Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. , author Rangaiah, G. , year 2011 . title A review on global optimization methods for phase equilibrium modeling and calculations . journal The Open Thermodynamics Journal volume 5 , pages 71--92

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.