The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2009.14512 · v1 · pith:BFHMDCGW · submitted 2020-09-30 · cond-mat.mtrl-sci · eess.IV· physics.ins-det

Fast versus conventional HAADF-STEM tomography: advantages and challenges

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:BFHMDCGWrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci eess.IVphysics.ins-det
keywords acquisitionelectrontomographyconventionaltechniquedoseexperimentalseries
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Electron tomography is a widely used experimental technique for analyzing nanometer-scale structures of a large variety of materials in three dimensions. Unfortunately, the acquisition of conventional electron tomography tilt series can easily take up one hour or more, depending on the complexity of the experiment. Using electron tomography, it is therefore far from straightforward to obtain statistically meaningful 3D data, to investigate samples that do not withstand long acquisition, or to perform in situ 3D characterization using this technique. Various acquisition strategies have been proposed to accelerate the tomographic acquisition, and reduce the required electron dose. These methods include tilting the holder continuously while acquiring a projection movie and a hybrid, incremental, methodology which combines the benefits of the conventional and continuous technique. In this paper, the different acquisition strategies will be experimentally compared in terms of speed, resolution and electron dose, based on experimental tilt series acquired for various metallic nanoparticles.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.