Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Are Shockley-Read-Hall and ABC models valid for lead halide perovskites?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.04163 v1 pith:BFN5X5H3 submitted 2020-09-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords chargemodelsperovskitesplqydevelopeddynamicshalideherein
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Metal halide perovskites are an important class of emerging semiconductors. Their charge dynamics is poorly understood due to limited knowledge of defect physics and charge recombination mechanisms. Nevertheless, classical ABC and Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) models are ubiquitously applied to perovskites without considering their validity. Herein, an advanced technique mapping photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) as a function of both the excitation pulse energy and repetition frequency is developed and employed to examine the validity of these models. While ABC and SRH fail to explain the charge dynamics in a broad range of conditions, the addition of Auger recombination and trapping to the SRH model enables a quantitative fitting of PLQY maps and low-power PL decay kinetics, and extracting trap concentrations and efficacies. Higher-power PL kinetics requires the inclusion of additional non-linear processes. The PLQY mapping developed herein is suitable for a comprehensive testing of theories and is applicable to any semiconductor.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools