Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Neutrino fog in the light dark sector: the role of isospin violation

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that in a minimal U(1)' dark sector, the same isospin-violating couplings that set the dark matter scattering rate also shift the coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section, so the neutrino floor and the DM exclusio

desk verdict Abstract describes a timely, internally coherent U(1)' scenario connecting the neutrino floor to the DM bound, but the shipped full text is unreadable, so the central quantitative claim cannot be checked here. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05787 v1 pith:BGRHAXCQ submitted 2025-08-07 hep-ph

Víctor Martín Lozano , Shankar Pramanik , Soumya Sadhukhan , Adrián Terrones This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords neutrinofogfloorisospinviolationcoherentelasticneutrino-nucleusscatteringdarkmatterdirectdetectionZ'bosonU(1)'modellightsector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the neutrino fog that limits dark matter direct detection is a fixed Standard Model background or can be reshaped by new physics. It works in a simple dark sector extension with a $U(1)^\prime$ gauge boson that couples to quarks and neutrinos in an isospin-violating way. The central claim is that the same fermion couplings that set the dark matter's neutron-to-proton coupling ratio $f_n/f_p$ also modify the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$\nu$NS) rate, so the neutrino floor can be raised or lowered. Because the experimental dark matter bound shifts with that same ratio, the allowed window between the neutrino background and the exclusion limit resizes with the model parameters. This matters for interpreting direct detection experiments around $10\,\mathrm{GeV}$, where the neutrino background and a potential dark matter signal begin to overlap.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $Z^\prime$ gauge boson of an extension of the Standard Model with a new local $U(1)^\prime$ symmetry and flavor-dependent couplings to light quarks. Its exchange contributes to both the dark matter-nucleus scattering amplitude and the CE$\nu$NS amplitude. The isospin-violating parameter $f_n/f_p$ is the ratio of the effective $Z^\prime$ couplings to neutrons and protons; it determines how the coherent cross sections scale. The neutrino floor is the boundary in the dark matter mass–cross section plane below which solar and other neutrinos constitute an irreducible background; the paper evaluates how this boundary and the experimental exclusion bound move as $f_n/f_p$

What would settle it

Measure the coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering rate in a low-background detector on two nuclei with different neutron-to-proton ratios (e.g., argon and xenon) and compare the ratio of rates to the Standard Model prediction. If the ratio agrees with the SM to high precision while the nuclear-recoil spectrum in the same detector requires $|f_n/f_p| \neq 1$ to fit a dark matter interpretation, then the single $Z^\prime$ coupling cannot be responsible for both effects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that in a minimal $U(1)^\prime$ dark sector where a $Z^\prime$ gauge boson couples to quarks and to neutrinos, the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering cross section is no longer the Standard Model one. The $Z^\prime$ exchange alters the effective weak charge of the nucleus, and because the light-quark couplings are not isospin symmetric, the ratio of neutron to proton couplings $f_n/f_p$ can differ from unity. The same ratio enters the spin-independent dark matter-nucleus cross section. As a result, the CE$\nu$NS cross section can increase or decrease relative to the Standard Model, shifting the neutrino floor up or down, and the dark matter exclusion bound mov

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a single set of quark charges under the new $U(1)^\prime$ interaction controls both the dark matter's neutron-to-proton coupling ratio $f_n/f_p$ and the neutrino scattering rate; if the charges are instead chosen independently for each scenario, the widening or narrowing of the allowed region is not a prediction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The neutrino fog is not a fixed curve: in this model its location in the ($m_\chi$, $\sigma_{\chi N}$) plane shifts with the $Z^\prime$ couplings.
  • The dark matter spin-independent exclusion bound moves with the same $f_n/f_p$ ratio, so the floor and the bound do not shift independently.
  • In the mass region around $10\,\mathrm{GeV}$, the overlap between the neutrino background and the dark matter signal is modified, changing the discovery reach of direct detection.
  • The scenarios show that the allowed parameter window between the neutrino floor and the experimental limit can be wider or narrower than in the isospin-conserving case.
  • The observation of solar neutrinos in dark matter detectors, if it occurs, would probe the modified CE$\nu$NS rate and the same $Z^\prime$ couplings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to use two targets with different neutron-to-proton ratios: measuring the ratio of their CE$\nu$NS rates would isolate the $Z^\prime$ contribution independently of the dark matter signal.
  • The model-dependence shown here likely persists in other light-mediator constructions, so claims of a 'standard' neutrino floor should be stated with an explicit model assumption.
  • Because the quark charges are free parameters, the paper's scenarios are illustrative rather than predictive; a proper statistical analysis would need to marginalize over allowed charge assignments.
  • If a low-energy nuclear recoil excess appears, the framework blurs the distinction between background and signal: the excess could be solar neutrinos with a modified rate rather than dark matter, and the same parameter would govern the interpretation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in a U(1)' dark-sector extension of the Standard Model, both dark matter and neutrinos acquire isospin-violating (IV) interactions with nuclei through a new Z' boson. The central claim is that, depending on model parameters, the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) cross section can increase or decrease, shifting the neutrino floor up or down, and that the dark-matter direct-detection bound shifts accordingly, with the shift driven exclusively by the IV ratio f_n/f_p. The authors construct scenarios based on the interplay between the neutrino floor and the DM bound, and discuss solar-neutrino observation in direct-detection experiments. However, the supplied full text is not readable: it consists entirely of encoding artifacts, with no equations, tables, references, or numerical results. Thus only the abstract-level claim can be assessed.

Significance. If the derivations behind the abstract are correct, the paper would make a useful conceptual point: in a concrete BSM framework, the 'neutrino floor' is not a fixed background but depends on the same new-physics parameters that rescale the DM-nucleus cross section. The proposed link between the CE-vNS rate and the DM bound through a single IV parameter f_n/f_p is an interesting and falsifiable correlation, and the framework is simple enough to serve as a benchmark. The paper also addresses a timely question about solar neutrinos in DM experiments. However, the manuscript as supplied contains no readable technical content, so none of the quantitative claims can be checked. The paper would be significant only after the missing derivations, cross-section formulas, parameter choices, and numerical results are provided in readable form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text] The entire full text is unreadable: every equation, table, and reference is replaced by an encoding artifact. The central claim that the same U(1)' quark charge assignments control both the CE-vNS cross section and the DM-nucleus cross section via f_n/f_p cannot be verified. Please provide the actual manuscript with readable equations, especially the expressions for the Z' couplings to quarks and neutrinos, the definition of f_n/f_p, and the resulting CE-vNS and DM scattering cross sections.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'whose change is driven exclusively by the IV parameter f_n/f_p' is a strong quantitative claim. The abstract does not show how the DM-nucleus cross section depends on f_n/f_p after all other parameters (Z' mass, gauge coupling, DM mass) are fixed, nor why the CE-vNS shift and the DM-bound shift correlate. A derivation or a parametric study is needed to establish that this exclusivity is not an artifact of choosing the quark charges by hand for each scenario.
  3. [Abstract and scenarios] The statement that the CE-vNS cross section can 'either increase or decrease' is parameter-dependent. The paper currently does not specify which parameters are free and which are fixed by the model, nor does it provide the conditions on the U(1)' charges that produce an increase versus a decrease. Without this, the 'several scenarios' are not well-defined predictions but rather a menu of possibilities. Please provide explicit charge assignments and show the resulting floor and bound shifts in a reproducible way.
  4. [Numerical results] No numerical results are visible in the supplied text. The floor locations, DM exclusion curves, and allowed regions are quoted without any error treatment, experimental inputs, or statistical procedure. If the paper relies on specific experiments (e.g., XENON, LZ, CDMSlite) and a particular CE-vNS measurement, those inputs and the analysis pipeline must be stated so that the results can be reproduced.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from defining the notation f_n/f_p before using it, and from including a reference to the CE-vNS experimental result that sets the floor.
  2. [Full text] The supplied text contains no references at all. At minimum, citations to standard treatments of the neutrino floor, isospin-violating dark matter, and U(1)' models are needed.
  3. [Structure] The manuscript appears to be missing all section headings, figure captions, and table descriptions. Even after fixing the encoding, the structure should be restored so that the reader can follow which claims are derived and which are assumed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified: the abstract reports model-parameter dependence, not a definitional reduction or fitted-input prediction, and the supplied full text contains no readable derivation to inspect.

full rationale

The only readable portion of the manuscript is the abstract; the full-text body is supplied as unreadable encoding artifacts, so no equations, derivations, or citation chains can be quoted or checked. The abstract claims that in a U(1)' model both DM-nucleus and CEνNS cross sections are affected by isospin-violating couplings, with the DM bound change driven by f_n/f_p. That is a model-specific prediction: f_n/f_p is introduced as the IV parameter of the new gauge interaction, and whether the cross section increases or decreases depends on the chosen quark charges and couplings. This is parameter dependence, not circularity: the claimed outcome is not used to define f_n/f_p, nor is the predicted bound a fit to the same data. No self-definitional step, fitted input renamed as prediction, load-bearing self-citation, or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors is visible from the abstract. Under the hard rule that circularity must be demonstrated by quoted equations or explicit reduction, no circular step can be exhibited. The absence of readable equations is a completeness/verifiability problem, not evidence of circularity. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model introduces a Z' mediator and a set of free parameters (masses, coupling, charge assignments) that jointly control both DM scattering and CEνNS. The standard solar neutrino flux and halo assumptions are imported from prior literature as background inputs. Since the full text was not accessible, the ledger is reconstructed from the abstract and is necessarily incomplete.

free parameters (5)
  • isospin-violating ratio f_n/f_p = not given in abstract
    Controls the DM-nucleus coupling asymmetry and thus the change in the DM exclusion bound.
  • Z' mass m_Z' = not given in abstract
    Sets the mediator range and the size of new-physics corrections to CEνNS and DM scattering.
  • U(1)' gauge coupling g' = not given in abstract
    Sets the overall normalization of both DM and neutrino scattering cross sections.
  • dark matter mass m_chi = around 10 GeV (focus region)
    The DM mass marks the overlap region of the neutrino floor and the DM bound.
  • U(1)' charge assignment for light quarks = not given in abstract
    Determines the isospin structure inherited by both DM and neutrino couplings to nuclei.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The dark sector contains a new local U(1)' gauge symmetry with a Z' boson that couples to both DM and SM quarks/neutrinos.
    The whole framework rests on this model extension, stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Solar neutrino fluxes (pp, 7Be, 8B, etc.) are taken as known standard inputs when computing the neutrino floor.
    The neutrino floor is computed from SM neutrino scattering; BSM modifications to neutrino propagation or flux are not indicated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Standard direct detection halo assumptions (local DM density, velocity distribution) are used for the DM scattering rates.
    These inputs define the DM exclusion bound; no mention of modified halo assumptions in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Z' gauge boson of a new local U(1)' symmetry independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates isospin-violating interactions between DM, neutrinos, and quarks
    Such bosons are constrained by collider searches, neutrino experiments, and CEνNS measurements (e.g., COHERENT), so the entity has an external falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutrino fog in the light dark sector: the role of isospin violation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BGRHAXCQ

@misc{pith2026250805787,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutrino fog in the light dark sector: the role of isospin violation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BGRHAXCQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05787}
}
abstract

Dark matter (DM) direct detection is now standing at an interesting juncture, where the Standard Model (SM) neutrino background and the upper bound on the DM signal cross section are starting to overlap in the DM mass region around 10 GeV. The neutrino floor, which defines the extent of the neutrino background, can be modified in different Beyond Standard Model (BSM) setups. We work in a simple BSM dark sector extension of the SM visible sector, where isospin-violating interactions occur naturally. In this model, both DM and neutrinos have, in general, isospin-violating (IV) interactions with nuclei, through a newly added local U(1) gauge boson $Z^{\prime}$. Depending on the choice of the model parameters, the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CE$\mathrm{\nu}$NS) cross section can either increase or decrease, shifting up or down the neutrino floor in the parameter space. The same is true for the DM experimental upper bound, whose change is driven exclusively by the IV parameter $f_n/f_p$. Several scenarios are constructed, based on the interplay between the two regions and the allowed parameter space left between them, and discussed. The potential observation of solar neutrinos in DM direct detection experiments is also discussed in the context of our framework.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. New light mediators and the neutrino fog: Implications from XENONnT nuclear recoil data

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Light-mediator couplings are constrained more strongly when they attach to dark matter than to neutrinos, and the neutrinofog in xenon detectors is shifted and deformed under both scenarios.

  2. Shifting the neutrino fog: studying the Isospin-violating Dark Matter case

    hep-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Isospin-violating dark matter shifts the neutrino fog: in xenon, a Z-portal model (f_n/f_p ≈ -22) lowers the discovery limit while the Scotogenic model (f_n/f_p = 0) raises it.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Aalbers et al

    LZ Collaboration , J. Aalbers et al. , First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023), no. 4 041002, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2207.03764 2207.03764 ]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Meng et al

    PandaX-4T Collaboration , Y. Meng et al. , Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021), no. 26 261802, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2107.13438 2107.13438 ]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Bo et al

    PandaX Collaboration , Z. Bo et al. , Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54\,\,Tonne Year Exposure of PandaX-4T , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), no. 1 011805, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2408.00664 2408.00664 ]

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Aprile et al

    XENON Collaboration , E. Aprile et al. , WIMP Dark Matter Search using a 3.1 tonne year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2502.18005 2502.18005

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    C. A. J. O'Hare, New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021), no. 25 251802, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2109.03116 2109.03116 ]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in multi-ton scale dark matter experiments: Classification of vector and scalar interactions new physics signals

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, B. Dutta, S. Liao, and L. E. Strigari, Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering in multi-ton scale dark matter experiments: Classification of vector and scalar interactions new physics signals , JHEP 12 (2019) 124, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1910.12437 1910.12437 ]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Aristizabal Sierra, N

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, N. Mishra, and L. Strigari, Implications of first neutrino-induced nuclear recoil measurements in direct detection experiments: Probing nonstandard interaction via CE NS , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025), no. 5 055007, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2409.02003 2409.02003 ]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    De Romeri, D

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, and C. A. Ternes, Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CE NS data at direct detection experiments , JCAP 05 (2025) 012, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2411.11749 2411.11749 ]

    arXiv 2025

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    De Romeri, D

    V. De Romeri, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, C. A. Ternes, and M. T \'o rtola, Neutrino electromagnetic properties and sterile dipole portal in light of the first solar CE NS data , JCAP 05 (2025) 080, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2412.14991 2412.14991 ]

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Blanco-Mas, P

    P. Blanco-Mas, P. Coloma, G. Herrera, P. Huber, J. Kopp, I. M. Shoemaker, and Z. Tabrizi, Clarity through the Neutrino Fog: Constraining New Forces in Dark Matter Detectors , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2411.14206 2411.14206

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Li et al

    PandaX Collaboration , S. Li et al. , Search for Light Dark Matter with Ionization Signals in the PandaX-4T Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 26 261001, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2212.10067 2212.10067 ]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bo et al

    PandaX Collaboration , Z. Bo et al. , First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024), no. 19 191001, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2407.10892 2407.10892 ]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Aprile et al

    XENON Collaboration , E. Aprile et al. , Search for Coherent Elastic Scattering of Solar ^8 B Neutrinos in the XENON1T Dark Matter Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 091301, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2012.02846 2012.02846 ]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Aprile et al

    XENON Collaboration , E. Aprile et al. , First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024), no. 19 191002, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2408.02877 2408.02877 ]

    2024

  7. [15]

    Giuliani, Are direct search experiments sensitive to all spin-independent WIMP candidates? , Phys

    F. Giuliani, Are direct search experiments sensitive to all spin-independent WIMP candidates? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 101301, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0504157 hep-ph/0504157 ]

    2005 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia, and D. Sanford, Isospin-Violating Dark Matter , Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 124--127, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1102.4331 1102.4331 ]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    E. J. Chun, J.-C. Park, and S. Scopel, Dark matter and a new gauge boson through kinetic mixing , JHEP 02 (2011) 100, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1011.3300 1011.3300 ]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, S. Sarkar, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Direct detection of dark matter in models with a light Z' , JHEP 09 (2011) 128, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1107.2118 1107.2118 ]

    2011 arXiv

  11. [19]

    X. Gao, Z. Kang, and T. Li, Origins of the Isospin Violation of Dark Matter Interactions , JCAP 01 (2013) 021, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1107.3529 1107.3529 ]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    X.-G. He, B. Ren, and J. Tandean, Hints of Standard Model Higgs Boson at the LHC and Light Dark Matter Searches , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 093019, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1112.6364 1112.6364 ]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    He and J

    X.-G. He and J. Tandean, Low-Mass Dark-Matter Hint from CDMS II, Higgs Boson at the LHC, and Darkon Models , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 013020, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1304.6058 1304.6058 ]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, and D. Sanford, Xenophobic Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013), no. 1 015021, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1306.2315 1306.2315 ]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    B\'elanger, A

    G. B\'elanger, A. Goudelis, J.-C. Park, and A. Pukhov, Isospin-violating dark matter from a double portal , JCAP 02 (2014) 020, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1311.0022 1311.0022 ]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hamaguchi, S

    K. Hamaguchi, S. P. Liew, T. Moroi, and Y. Yamamoto, Isospin-Violating Dark Matter with Colored Mediators , JHEP 05 (2014) 086, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1403.0324 1403.0324 ]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    N. Chen, Q. Wang, W. Zhao, S.-T. Lin, Q. Yue, and J. Li, Exothermic isospin-violating dark matter after SuperCDMS and CDEX , Phys. Lett. B 743 (2015) 205--212, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1404.6043 1404.6043 ]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [26]

    V. M. Lozano, M. Peir\'o, and P. Soler, Isospin violating dark matter in St\"uckelberg portal scenarios , JHEP 04 (2015) 175, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1503.01780 1503.01780 ]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Crivellin, M

    A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura, and L. C. Tunstall, Light stops, blind spots, and isospin violation in the MSSM , JHEP 07 (2015) 129, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1503.03478 1503.03478 ]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Drozd, B

    A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski, J. F. Gunion, and Y. Jiang, Isospin-violating dark-matter-nucleon scattering via two-Higgs-doublet-model portals , JCAP 10 (2016) 040, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1510.07053 1510.07053 ]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Chang, X.-G

    C.-F. Chang, X.-G. He, and J. Tandean, Two-Higgs-Doublet-Portal Dark-Matter Models in Light of Direct Search and LHC Data , JHEP 04 (2017) 107, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1702.02924 1702.02924 ]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Mart\' n-Lozano and S

    V. Mart\' n-Lozano and S. Oviedo-Casado, The non-Universal U(1) gauge extended SSM: anomalies cancellation and singular phenomenology , JHEP 09 (2018) 102, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1804.02378 1804.02378 ]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Li, Q.-F

    T. Li, Q.-F. Xiang, Q.-S. Yan, X. Zhang, and H. Zhou, Isospin-violating dark matter in a U(1)' model inspired by E_6 , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 3 035016, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1908.00423 1908.00423 ]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    V. M. Lozano, R. M. S. Seoane, and J. Zurita, Z'-explorer 2.0: Reconnoitering the dark matter landscape , Comput. Phys. Commun. 288 (2023) 108729, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2109.13194 2109.13194 ]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    D. R. Tovey, R. J. Gaitskell, P. Gondolo, Y. A. Ramachers, and L. Roszkowski, A New model independent method for extracting spin dependent (cross-section) limits from dark matter searches , Phys. Lett. B 488 (2000) 17--26, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0005041 hep-ph/0005041 ]

    2000 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Zheng, Z

    H. Zheng, Z. Zhang, and L.-W. Chen, Form Factor Effects in the Direct Detection of Isospin-Violating Dark Matter , JCAP 08 (2014) 011, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1403.5134 1403.5134 ]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    C. E. Yaguna, Isospin-violating dark matter in the light of recent data , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017), no. 5 055015, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1610.08683 1610.08683 ]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Kelso, J

    C. Kelso, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia, and P. Sandick, Directly detecting Isospin-Violating Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018), no. 5 056004, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1711.01644 1711.01644 ]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    C. E. Yaguna, New Constraints on Xenonphobic Dark Matter from DEAP-3600 , JCAP 04 (2019) 041, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1902.10256 1902.10256 ]

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Cheek, D

    A. Cheek, D. D. Price, and E. M. Sandford, Isospin-violating dark matter at liquid noble detectors: new constraints, future projections, and an exploration of target complementarity , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023), no. 10 914, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2302.05458 2302.05458 ]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Kumar, D

    J. Kumar, D. Marfatia, and N. Song, Opening windows with isospin-violating dark matter , Phys. Lett. B 851 (2024) 138576, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2312.11365 2312.11365 ]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Abdallah et al

    J. Abdallah et al. , Simplified Models for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC , Phys. Dark Univ. 9-10 (2015) 8--23, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1506.03116 1506.03116 ]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    De Simone and T

    A. De Simone and T. Jacques, Simplified models vs. effective field theory approaches in dark matter searches , Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016), no. 7 367, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1603.08002 1603.08002 ]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Kahlhoefer, K

    F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, T. Schwetz, and S. Vogl, Implications of unitarity and gauge invariance for simplified dark matter models , JHEP 02 (2016) 016, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1510.02110 1510.02110 ]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    D'Eramo, B

    F. D'Eramo, B. J. Kavanagh, and P. Panci, You can hide but you have to run: direct detection with vector mediators , JHEP 08 (2016) 111, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1605.04917 1605.04917 ]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Ismail, W.-Y

    A. Ismail, W.-Y. Keung, K.-H. Tsao, and J. Unwin, Axial vector Z^ and anomaly cancellation , Nucl. Phys. B 918 (2017) 220--244, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1609.02188 1609.02188 ]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, and P. Tunney, Anomaly-Free Dark Matter Models are not so Simple , JHEP 08 (2017) 053, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1704.03850 1704.03850 ]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Abreu et al

    DELPHI Collaboration , P. Abreu et al. , A Study of radiative muon pair events at Z^0 energies and limits on an additional Z^ gauge boson , Z. Phys. C 65 (1995) 603--618

    1995

  39. [47]

    Aaij et al

    LHCb Collaboration , R. Aaij et al. , Search for Dark Photons Produced in 13 TeV pp Collisions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 6 061801, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1710.02867 1710.02867 ]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    BaBar Collaboration , J. P. Lees et al. , Search for a Dark Photon in e^+e^- Collisions at BaBar , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014), no. 20 201801, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1406.2980 1406.2980 ]

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    De Romeri, O

    V. De Romeri, O. G. Miranda, D. K. Papoulias, G. Sanchez Garcia, M. T\'ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, Physics implications of a combined analysis of COHERENT CsI and LAr data , JHEP 04 (2023) 035, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2211.11905 2211.11905 ]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    V. M. Lozano, G. Sanchez Garcia, and A. Terrones, Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: Confronting COHERENT and LHC , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2503.11766 2503.11766

  43. [51]

    Billard, L

    J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), no. 2 023524, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1307.5458 1307.5458 ]

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    R. H. Helm, Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei , Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 1466--1475

    1956

  45. [53]

    J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil , Astropart. Phys. 6 (1996) 87--112

    1996

  46. [54]

    D. G. Cerde\ no, M. Fairbairn, T. Jubb, P. A. N. Machado, A. C. Vincent, and C. B hm, Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments , JHEP 05 (2016) 118, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1604.01025 1604.01025 ]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 048 (2016)]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Bertuzzo, F

    E. Bertuzzo, F. F. Deppisch, S. Kulkarni, Y. F. Perez Gonzalez, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Dark Matter and Exotic Neutrino Interactions in Direct Detection Searches , JHEP 04 (2017) 073, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1701.07443 1701.07443 ]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    L. E. Strigari, Neutrino Coherent Scattering Rates at Direct Dark Matter Detectors , New J. Phys. 11 (2009) 105011, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/0903.3630 0903.3630 ]

    2009 arXiv

  49. [57]

    C. B hm, D. G. Cerde\ no, P. A. N. Machado, A. Olivares-Del Campo, E. Perdomo, and E. Reid, How high is the neutrino floor? , JCAP 01 (2019) 043, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1809.06385 1809.06385 ]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Sadhukhan and M

    S. Sadhukhan and M. P. Singh, Neutrino floor in leptophilic U(1) models: Modification in U(1)_ L_ -L_ , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 1 015015, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2006.05981 2006.05981 ]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Aristizabal Sierra, V

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, L. J. Flores, and D. K. Papoulias, Impact of COHERENT measurements, cross section uncertainties and new interactions on the neutrino floor , JCAP 01 (2022), no. 01 055, [ http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2109.03247 2109.03247 ]

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.