Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Interface Engineering in Hybrid Iodide CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Using Lewis Base and Graphene towards High Performance Solar Cells

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that adding thiocarbamide and graphene to the CH3NH3PbI3 surface gives the strongest binding, removes deep trap states under iodine-rich conditions, and raises the iodine migration barrier, lifting measured efficiency…

desk verdict A useful comparative DFT study of Lewis-base/graphene interfaces on MAPI, with a conditional trap-passivation claim that needs more support before the central ranking is accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05237 v2 pith:BH2ALLPW submitted 2019-08-09 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chol-Jun Yu , Yun-Hyok Kye , Un-Gi Jong , Song-Guk Ko , Kum-Chol Ri , Song-Hyok Choe , Jin-Song Kim , Gwon-Il Ryu
show 1 more author
Byol Kim
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords halideperovskiteLewisbasegrapheneworkfunctiondefectpassivationiodinemigrationsolarcelldensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish why Lewis-base molecules plus a graphene layer improve hybrid perovskite solar cells, and which of three Lewis bases works best. Density functional theory on $\mathrm{CH_3NH_3PbI_3}(110)$ surfaces shows sulfur-donor thiocarbamide (TCA) and thioacetamide (TAA) bind more strongly to the perovskite and to graphene than oxygen-donor dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), with TCA the strongest. The calculations also indicate that, when the perovskite is processed under iodine-rich conditions, the only defect creating deep mid-gap states in the TCA and TAA interfaces is the Pb-on-I antisite, whose high formation energy means it should be suppressed, whereas DMSO leaves deep traps from all studied defects. The same interfaces raise the activation barrier for vacancy-mediated iodine migration, implying better stability. Supporting devices show that adding 15 mg/mL TCA raises power-conversion efficiency from 10.20% to 13.03%.

What carries the argument

The central object is a slab model of the $\mathrm{PbI_2}$-terminated $\mathrm{CH_3NH_3PbI_3}(110)$ surface covered by a monolayer of one of three Lewis bases (TCA, TAA, or DMSO) and a graphene layer, studied with density functional theory using a van der Waals-corrected functional. The argument runs through four connected quantities: adsorption and interlayer binding energies per carbon atom for binding strength; the interface dipole and work-function change for electron extraction; defect formation energies together with total and local density of states to classify deep versus shallow trap levels; and activation barriers for vacancy-mediated iodine migration along the edge of a $\mathrm{PbI_5}$ octahedron. The S-donor lone pair binds to Pb atoms while the $\mathrm{NH_2}$ and $\mathrm{CH_3}$ groups hydrogen-bond to iodine atoms, which is why TCA binds strongest and, under iodine-rich conditions, leaves no deep traps.

What would settle it

Grow thiocarbamide-treated $\mathrm{CH_3NH_3PbI_3}$ under deliberately iodine-poor (Pb-rich) conditions and measure sub-gap absorption or deep-level photoluminescence; if a mid-gap state near the predicted lead-on-iodine antisite level appears, the deep-trap-elimination claim fails for those conditions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a mechanistic ranking of three $\mathrm{CH_3NH_3PbI_3}$-Lewis base-graphene interfaces. In the MAPI-TCA-G interface, the S-donor TCA forms the strongest adsorption and interlayer binding, the shortest graphene-to-surface distance, and a work-function reduction directed toward graphene that should promote electron extraction. Defect-formation analysis on the $\mathrm{PbI_2}$-terminated (110) surface shows that under iodine-rich conditions the only defect creating deep trap states in the TCA and TAA interfaces is the Pb-on-I antisite ($\mathrm{Pb_I}$), whose formation energy is high enough (5.15 eV for TCA) that it is unlikely to form, while the DMSO interface retains deep traps for all tested defects. Vacancy-mediated iodine migration barriers are highest with TCA, indicating slower degradation. A companion experiment with thiocarbamide at 15 mg/mL raises the efficiency from 10.20% to 13.03%, in line with these predictions.

Load-bearing premise

The deep-trap-elimination claim depends on the perovskite being formed under iodine-rich conditions, where the only deep trap (a lead atom sitting on an iodine site) costs 5.15 eV to form, and the paper does not verify that the actual devices were iodine-rich.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, S-donor Lewis bases such as thiocarbamide should outperform the O-donor DMSO in perovskite-graphene devices, with TCA the best of the three studied.
  • Under iodine-rich processing, TCA and TAA interfaces should show no deep mid-gap defect states, so non-radiative recombination should be suppressed, while DMSO interfaces should retain traps.
  • The higher iodine migration barrier with the TCA interface implies slower iodine-vacancy-mediated degradation and improved operational stability.
  • The work-function reduction at the MAPI-TCA-G interface should favor electron transfer from perovskite to graphene, improving charge extraction.
  • The measured efficiency gain, from 10.20% to 13.03% with 15 mg/mL TCA, is the experimental counterpart of the predicted trap removal and stronger interface bonding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The iodine-rich assumption could be tested by varying halide stoichiometry during TCA-treated film growth; the model predicts deep traps should reappear under Pb-rich conditions because the Pb-on-I antisite becomes cheap to form.
  • The same Lewis-base-graphene design may extend to other hybrid perovskites such as formamidinium lead iodide, since the acid-base binding mechanism does not depend on the methylammonium cation specifically.
  • Time-resolved photoluminescence on TCA-treated films should show longer carrier lifetimes if the predicted deep-trap removal is real, a measurement the paper does not report.
  • Devices made with and without the graphene layer but with the same TCA treatment could isolate how much of the efficiency gain comes from the molecule versus the graphene contact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper combines DFT calculations and device experiments to study MAPI(110) interfaces with three Lewis bases (thiocarbamide, thioacetamide, dimethyl sulfoxide) and a graphene layer. The DFT part quantifies interface binding, charge redistribution, interface dipoles and work function changes, defect formation energies for vacancies and antisites under I-rich and Pb-rich conditions, density-of-states analysis of defect levels, and iodine migration barriers. The authors conclude that the MAPI-TCA-G system is the most desirable for efficiency and stability because it binds most strongly, suppresses deep trap states (only the PbI antisite is deep and it is argued to be absent under I-rich conditions), and gives the highest iodine migration barrier. The experimental part reports a PCE increase from 10.20% to 13.03% when 15 mg/mL TCA is added to the perovskite precursor, which the authors interpret as support for their theoretical predictions.

Significance. If established, the results would provide a mechanistic rationale for Lewis-base/graphene interface engineering in halide perovskite solar cells and a concrete design rule favoring S-donor molecules. The paper has genuine strengths: it uses first-principles calculations without parameter fitting to the target PCE, includes van der Waals corrections, uses Monte Carlo sampling for adsorbate configurations, and directly connects the simulation to a new experiment. However, the central 'deep trap states elimination' claim and the resulting 'most desirable' ranking rest on two untested assumptions: that the experimental growth conditions are iodine-rich, and that GGA-level DOS without spin-orbit coupling reliably classifies defect levels as deep or shallow. These issues need to be resolved before the mechanistic conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Defect analysis (Table 2, Figure 3)] The claim of 'deep trap states elimination' is not supported by a direct comparison to the bare MAPI(110) surface. Figure 3a shows TDOS only for the MAPI-mol-G interface systems, with and without each defect. To demonstrate that the interface eliminates deep traps, the same defect DOS must be shown for the bare MAPI(110) slab computed with the identical methodology. Without this baseline, the reader cannot distinguish whether the interface itself passivates the defects or whether the defects are intrinsically shallow or deep on the clean surface. This baseline is load-bearing for the abstract's 'deep trap states elimination' statement and for the ranking of the three interface systems.
  2. [Defect formation energies (Table 2) and experimental conditions (Figure 4)] The passivation conclusion relies on the I-rich chemical-potential endpoint, but the manuscript never demonstrates that the experimental TCA devices are processed under I-rich conditions. Table 2 gives E_f(PbI) = 5.15 eV under I-rich, but this drops to 1.39 eV under Pb-rich; under Pb-rich the deep PbI antisite would be abundant and the claimed suppression fails. The experiments report no I/Pb stoichiometry, precursor ratio, or chemical-potential analysis, and the text offers no kinetic argument for why a thermodynamic formation energy should prevent non-equilibrium PbI incorporation during solution processing. The statement 'the I-rich condition is favorable for surface trap passivation' is therefore an unverified auxiliary hypothesis rather than a demonstrated property of the TCA interface.
  3. [Methodology (Figure 1 caption and Figure 3)] The deep/shallow classification is made from neutral-defect DOS at the GGA level (BLYP) without spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and without charged-defect transition levels. For lead iodide perovskites, SOC strongly modifies the band-edge character and can shift defect levels by several tenths of an eV, which is exactly the margin that separates a deep mid-gap state from a shallow state. In addition, the thermodynamic identity of a defect as a recombination center is properly established through charge-state transition levels, not through the neutral DOS alone. The authors should either repeat key defect calculations with SOC and/or a hybrid functional, or compute transition levels, before asserting that TCA and TAA interfaces eliminate deep traps while DMSO does not.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] The caption has a labeling inconsistency: panel (c) is used twice ('Top view of vacancy-mediated I atom migration... and (c) their activation barriers'), and Figure 3d is referenced in the main text. The fourth panel should be labeled (d).
  2. [Figure 4 caption and main text] The SEM images are referred to in the text as '(Figure 4e)' and '(Figure 4f)', but the caption reads 'SEM images for the perovskite films coated on FTO (d) without and (f) with 15 mg/mL TCA'. The '(d)' appears to be a typo for '(e)'.
  3. [Table 1] The formation energy E_f is listed in kJ/mol without specifying whether the value is per molecule, per surface cell, or per adsorbed monolayer. The text discusses 'adsorption energies per molecule' for different coverages, so Table 1 should state the normalization explicitly to allow comparison with the SI values.
  4. [Interface dipole decomposition] The decomposition of the interface dipole into bond dipole and molecular dipole components is essential for the work-function analysis, but the main text gives only the final numbers (e.g., TCA molecular dipole −1.2 D and bond dipole 5.4 D) and refers the reader to the SI. A one-sentence definition of how these components are computed would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DFT predictions are forward calculations and the experiment is an after-the-fact validation, not a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's central results are forward DFT quantities: interface binding energies, interlayer distances, work-function changes, defect formation energies, and iodine migration barriers. None of these are fitted to the measured PCE, and the experimental section (TCA concentration series yielding 13.03% vs 10.20%) is presented as validation after the prediction, not as an input to it. The comparison between S-donor and O-donor Lewis bases follows from the computed energetics and electronic structure, and the ranking of MAPI-TCA-G as most desirable is a synthesis of those computed quantities. The self-citations (refs. 30, 47, 52) are background experimental or prior-simulation support and are not load-bearing in the sense of defining the target result: ref. 30 is used for the Lewis-base adduct strategy and refs. 47 and 52 for earlier defect and ion-transport calculations, but the present formation energies, DOS classifications, and barriers are recomputed here. The 'I-rich condition' invoked in the defect analysis is an explicit chemical-potential assumption, not a circular definition: the paper does not claim the experimental device is I-rich, and the formation energies are obtained from DFT rather than from the measured efficiency. Whether the actual growth conditions are I-rich, or whether GGA without spin-orbit coupling correctly classifies deep versus shallow states, are correctness questions, not demonstrations that the derivation is equivalent to its inputs. No equation or fitted parameter is reused as a prediction, and no self-citation chain forces the conclusion. The work is self-contained against its own external benchmark, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the experimental target; the calculations use standard DFT settings. The key axioms are the relevance of the PbI2-terminated (110) surface, the adequacy of GGA without SOC for defect levels, and the assumption of iodine-rich growth conditions for the trap-passivation conclusion.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The PbI2-terminated (110) surface is the most stable and experimentally relevant surface of MAPI
    The paper uses this termination for all interface models, citing refs [39,42,43]. If another termination dominates under real conditions, the defect and binding results may not apply.
  • domain assumption GGA-DFT without spin-orbit coupling reliably classifies defect levels as deep or shallow
    The calculations use BLYP+vdW without SOC. In lead halide perovskites, SOC is known to alter band structure and defect-level positions, and GGA often underestimates band gaps, which can misplace trap states.
  • domain assumption The device operates under iodine-rich conditions that suppress PbI defects
    The trap-passivation conclusion for TCA relies on the high formation energy of PbI under I-rich conditions (5.15 eV). The paper does not verify that the experimental growth or operation conditions are iodine-rich.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interface Engineering in Hybrid Iodide CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Using Lewis Base and Graphene towards High Performance Solar Cells." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BH2ALLPW

@misc{pith2026190805237,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interface Engineering in Hybrid Iodide CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Using Lewis Base and Graphene towards High Performance Solar Cells},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BH2ALLPW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05237}
}
read the original abstract

Perovskite solar cells have achieved a substantial breakthrough via advanced interface engineerings. Reports have emphasized that combining the hybrid perovskites with Lewis base and graphene improve the performance; the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Here, using density functional theory, we show that upon the formation of CH3NH3PbI3 interfaces with three different Lewis base molecules and graphene, the binding strength with S-donors thiocarbamide and thioacetamide is higher than with O-donor dimethyl sulfoxide, while the interface dipole and work function reduction tend to increase from S-donors to O-donor. Furthermore, we provide evidences of deep trap states elimination in the S-donor perovskite interfaces through the analysis of defect formation on CH3NH3PbI3(110) surface, and of stability enhancement by estimating activation barriers for iodine atom migrations. These theoretical predictions are in line with the experimental observation of performance enhancement in the perovskites prepared using thiocarbamide.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05237 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Molecular structures of the Lewis base molecules thiocarbamide (TCA), thioacetamide (TAA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). (b) Atomistic geome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Isosurface view of spatial electron density di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Total density of states (TDOS) in MAPI-mol-G (mol: TCA, TAA, DMSO) interfaces without and with the I- and Pb-related point defects such as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental investigation of the MAPI perovskites with TCA of various concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 mg/ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. K. Ono, N.-G. Park, K. Zhu, W. Huang, Y . Qi, Perovskite Solar Cells– Towards Commercialization, ACS Energy Lett. 2 (2017) 1749–1751

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Z. Li, T. R. Klein, D. H. Kim, M. Yang, J. J. Berry, M. F. A. M. van Hest, K. Zhu, Scalable Fabrication of Perovskite Solar Cells, Nat. Rev. Mater. 3 (2018) 18017

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Y . Li, L. Ji, R. Liu, C. Zhang, C. H. Mak, X. Zou, H.-H. Shen, S.-Y . Leu, H.-Y . Hsu, A Review on Morphology Engineering for Highly E fficient and Stable Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells, J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 12842–12875

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Schulz, Interface Design for Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells, ACS Energy Lett

    P. Schulz, Interface Design for Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells, ACS Energy Lett. 3 (2018) 1287–1293

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    S. B. Naghadeh, B. Luo, G. Abdelmageed, Y .-C. Pu, C. Zhang, J. Z. Zhang, Photophysical Properties and Improved Stability of Organic- Inorganic Perovskite by Surface Passivation, J. Phys. Chem. C 122 (2018) 15799–15818

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    S. Ye, H. Rao, Z. Zhao, L. Zhang, H. Bao, W. Sun, Y . Li, F. Gu, J. Wang, Z. Liu, Z. Bian, C. Huang, A Breakthrough Efficiency of 19.9% Obtained in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells by Using an Efficient Trap State Passi- vator Cu(thiourea)I, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 7504–7512

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    D. Shen, A. Pang, Y . Li, J. Dou, M. Wei, Metal-Organic Frameworks at Interfaces of Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells for Enhanced Photovoltaic Properties, Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 1253–1256

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Stolterfoht, C

    M. Stolterfoht, C. M. Wol ff, J. A. M ´arquez, S. Zhang, C. J. Hages, D. Rothhardt, S. Albrecht, P. L. Burn, P. Meredith, T. Unold, D. Ne- her, Visualization and Suppression of Interfacial Recombination for High- Efficiency Large-Area Pin Perovskite Solar Cells, Nat. Energy 3 (2018) 847–854

    work page 2018

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    X. Wen, J. Wu, D. Gao, C. Lin, Interfacial Engineering with Amino- Functionalized Graphene for E fficient Perovskite Solar Cells, J. Mater. Chem. A 4 (2016) 13482–13487

    2016

  2. [10]

    Qian, Z.-Y

    C.-X. Qian, Z.-Y . Deng, K. Yang, J. Feng, M.-Z. Wang, Z. Yang, S. Liu, H.-J. Feng, Interface engineering of CsPbBr 3/TiO2 heterostruc- ture with enhanced optoelectronic properties for all-inorganic perovskite solar cells, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 (2018) 093901

    2018

  3. [11]

    H. Li, G. Tong, T. Chen, H. Zhu, G. Li, Y . Chang, L. Wang, Y . Jiang, In- terface Engineering Using a Perovskite Derivative Phase for Efficient and Stable CsPbBr3 Solar Cells, J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 14255–14261

    2018

  4. [12]

    Lee, H.-S

    J.-W. Lee, H.-S. Kim, N.-G. Park, Lewis Acid-Base Adduct Approach for High E fficiency Perovskite Solar Cells, Acc. Chem. Res. 49 (2016) 311–319. 5

    2016

  5. [13]

    J. A. Christians, P. Schulz, J. S. Tinkham, T. H. Schloemer, S. P. Har- vey, B. J. T. de Villers, A. Sellinger, J. J. Berry, J. M. Luther, Tailored Interfaces of Unencapsulated Perovskite Solar Cells for>1,000 hour Op- erational Stability, Nat. Energy 3 (2018) 68–74

    2018

  6. [14]

    L. K. Ono, Y . B. Qi, Surface and Interface Aspects of Organometal Halide Perovskite Materials and Solar Cells, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 (2016) 4764– 4794

    2016

  7. [15]

    Zhang, M

    S. Zhang, M. Stolterfoht, A. Armin, Q. Lin, F. Zu, J. Sobus, H. Jin, N. Koch, P. Meredith, P. L. Burn, D. Neher, Interface Engineering of Solution-Processed Hybrid Organohalide Perovskite Solar Cells, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (2018) 21681–21687

    2018

  8. [16]

    L. Qiu, L. K. Ono, Y . Jiang, M. R. Leyden, S. R. Raga, S. Wang, Y . Qi, Engineering Interface Structure to Improve E fficiency and Stability of Organometal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells, J. Phys. Chem. B 122 (2018) 511–520

    2018

  9. [17]

    Lindblad, D

    R. Lindblad, D. Bi, B. w. Park, J. Oscarsson, M. Gorgoi, H. Siegbahn, M. Odelius, E. M. J. Johansson, H. Rensmo, Electronic Structure of TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cell Interfaces, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 (2014) 648–653

    2014

  10. [18]

    Roiati, E

    V . Roiati, E. Mosconi, A. Listorti, S. Colella, G. Gigli, F. de Angelis, Stark Effect in Perovskite/TiO2 Solar Cells: Evidence of Local Interfacial Order, Nano Lett. 14 (2014) 2168–2174

    2014

  11. [19]

    Uratani, K

    H. Uratani, K. Yamashita, Charge Carrier Trapping at Surface Defects of Perovskite Solar Cell Absorbers: A First-Principles Study, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 (2017) 742–746

    2017

  12. [20]

    Zheng, B

    X. Zheng, B. Chen, J. Dai, Y . Fang, Y . Bai, Y . Lin, H. Wei, X. C. Zeng, J. Huang, Defect Passivation in Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells using Qua- ternary Ammonium Halide Anions and Cations, Nat. Energy 2 (2017) 17102

    2017

  13. [21]

    Grancini, C

    G. Grancini, C. Rold ´a-Carmona, I. Zimmermann, E. Mosconi, X. Lee, D. Martineau, S. Narbey, F. Oswald, F. D. Angelis, M. Graetzel, M. K. Nazeeruddin, One-Year Stable Perovskite Solar Cells by 2D/3D Interface Engineering, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 15684

    2017

  14. [22]

    Q. Wang, Y . Shao, Q. Dong, Z. Xiao, Y . Yuan, J. Huang, Large Fill-Factor Bilayer Iodide Perovskite Solar Cells Fabricated by Low-Temperature So- lution Process, Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (2014) 2359–2365

    2014

  15. [23]

    Y . Shao, Z. Xiao, C. Bi, Y . Yuan, J. Huang, Origin and Elimination of Photocurrent Hysterisis by Fullerene Passivation in CH3NH3PbI3 Planar Hetero Junction Solar Cells, Nat. Commun. 5 (2014) 5784

    2014

  16. [24]

    J. Xu, A. Buin, A. H. Ip, W. Li, O. V oznyy, R. Comin, M. Yuan, S. Jeon, Z. Ning, J. J. McDowell, P. Kanjanaboos, J. P. Sun, X. Lan, L. N. Quan, D. H. Kim, I. G. Hill, P. Maksymovych, E. H. Sargent, Perovskite- Fullerene Hybrid Materials Suppress Hysterisis in Planar Diodes, N...

    2015

  17. [25]

    Hadadian, J

    M. Hadadian, J. P. Correa-Baena, E. K. Goharshadi, A. Ummadisingu, J. Y . Seo, J. Luo, S. Gholipour, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Saliba, A. Abate, M. Gratzel, A. Hagfeldt, Enhancement E fficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells via N-Doped Graphene: Crystal Modification and Surface Passi- va...

    2016

  18. [26]

    J. T. W. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Pathak, W. Zhang, D. W. deQuilettes, F. Wisnivesky-Rocca-Rivarola, J. Huang, P. K. Nayak, J. B. Patel, H. A. M. Yusof, Y . Vaynzof, R. Zhu, I. Ramirez, J. Zhang, C. Ducati, C. Grovenor, M. B. Johnston, D. S. Ginger, R. J. Nicholas, H. J. Snaith, Effici...

    2016

  19. [27]

    Abate, M

    A. Abate, M. Saliba, D. J. Hollman, S. D. Stranks, K. Wojciechowski, R. Avolio, G. Grancini, A. Petrozza, H. J. Snaith, Supermolecular Halo- gen Bond Passivation of Organic-Inorganic Halide Perovskite Solar Cells, Nano Lett. 14 (2014) 3247–3254

    2014

  20. [28]

    N. K. Noel, A. Abate, S. D. Stranks, E. S. Parrott, V . M. Burlakov, A. Goriely, H. J. Snaith, Enhanced Photoluminescence and Solar Cell Per- formance via Lewis Base Passivation of OrganicInorganic Lead Halide Perovskites, ACS Nano 8 (2014) 9815–9821

    2014

  21. [29]

    S. Ye, H. Rao, W. Yan, Y . Li, W. Sun, H. Peng, Z. Liu, Z. Bian, Y . Li, C. Huang, A Strategy to Simplify the Preparation Process of Perovskite Solar Cells by Co-Deposition of a Hole-Conductor and a Perovskite Layer, Adv. Mater. 28 (2016) 9648–9654

    2016

  22. [30]

    Ko, G.-I

    S.-G. Ko, G.-I. Ryu, B. Kim, G.-J. Cha, J.-H. Ri, G.-S. Sonu, U.-C. Kim, Effects of Thiourea on The Perovskite Crystallization for Fully Printable Solar Cells, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 196 (2019) 105–110

    2019

  23. [31]

    Hsieh, Y

    C. Hsieh, Y . Liao, Y . Lin, C. Chen, C. Tsai, W. Diaua, S. Chuang, Low- Temperature, Simple and Efficient Preparation of Perovskite Solar Cells Using Lewis Bases Urea and Thiourea as Additives: Stimulating Large Grain Growth and Providing a PCE Up To 18.8%, RSC Adv. 8 (2018) 19610–

    2018

  24. [32]

    Bonaccorso, L

    F. Bonaccorso, L. Colombo, G. Yu, M. Stoller, V . Tozzini, A. C. Ferrari, R. S. Ruoff, V . Pellegrini, Graphene, Related Two-Dimensional Crystals, and Hybrid Systems for Energy Conversion and Storage, Science 347 (2015) 1246501

    2015

  25. [33]

    K. P. Loh, S. W. Tong, J. Wu, Graphene and Graphene-like Molecules: Prospects in Solar Cells, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 1095–1102

    2016

  26. [34]

    Capasso, L

    A. Capasso, L. Salamandra, G. Faggio, T. Dikonimos, F. Buonocore, V . Morandi, L. Ortolani, N. Lisi, Chemical Vapor Deposited Graphene- Based Derivative As High-Performance Hole Transport Material for Or- ganic Photovoltaics, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2016) 23844–23853

    2016

  27. [35]

    J. Li, J. X. Yao, X. Y . Liao, R. L. Yu, H. R. Xia, W. T. Sun, L. M. Peng, A Contact Study in Hole Conductor Free Perovskite Solar Cells with Low Temperature Processed Carbon Electrodes, RSC Adv. 7 (2017) 20732– 20737

    2017

  28. [36]

    L. Liu, A. Mei, T. Liu, P. Jiang, Y . Sheng, L. Zhang, H. Han, Fully Printable Mesoscopic Perovskite Solar Cells with Organic Silane Self- Assembled Monolayer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 1790–1793

    2015

  29. [37]

    Y . Rong, Z. Ku, A. Mei, T. Liu, M. Xu, S. Ko, X. Li, H. Han, Hole- Conductor-Free Mesoscopic TiO 2/CH3NH3PbI3 Heterojunction Solar Cells Based on Anatase Nanosheets and Carbon Counter Electrodes, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 (2014) 2160–2164

    2014

  30. [38]

    Poglitsch, D

    A. Poglitsch, D. Weber, Dynamic Disorder in Methylammoniumtri- halogenoplumbates (ii) Observed by Millimeter-Wave Spectroscopy, J. Chem. Phys. 87 (1987) 6373–6378

    1987

  31. [39]

    J. H. Heo, S. H. Im, J. H. Noh, T. N. Mandal, C.-S. Lim, J. A. Chang, Y . H. Lee, H.-J. Kim, A. Sarkar, M. K. Nazeeruddin, et al., Efficient Inorganic- Organic Hybrid Heterojunction Solar Cells Containing Perovskite Com- pound and Polymeric Hole Conductors, Nat. Photonics 7 (201...

    2013

  32. [40]

    Zibouche, G

    N. Zibouche, G. V olonakis, F. Giustino, Graphene Oxide /Perovskite In- terfaces For Photovoltaics, J. Phys. Chem. C 122 (2018) 16715–16726

    2018

  33. [41]

    V olonakis, F

    G. V olonakis, F. Giustino, Ferroelectric Graphene-Perovskite Interfaces, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 (2015) 2496–2502

    2015

  34. [42]

    Haruyama, K

    J. Haruyama, K. Sodeyama, L. Han, Y . Tateyama, Termination Depen- dence of Tetragonal CH3NH3PbI3 Surfaces for Perovskite Solar Cells, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 (2014) 2903–2909

    2014

  35. [43]

    Haruyama, K

    J. Haruyama, K. Sodeyama, L. Han, Y . Tateyama, Surface Properties of CH3NH3PbI3 for Perovskite Solar Cells, Acc. Chem. Res. 49 (2016) 554– 561

    2016

  36. [44]

    Wharf, T

    I. Wharf, T. Gramstad, R. Makhija, M. Onyszchuk, Synthesis and Vi- brational Spectra of Some Lead(I1) Halide Adducts with O-, S-, and N- Donor Atom Ligands, Can. J. Chem. 54 (1976) 3430–3438

    1976

  37. [45]

    W. Liu, B. Schuler, Y . Xu, N. Moll, G. Meyer, L. Gross, A. Tkatchenko, Identical Binding Energies and Work Functions for Distinct Adsorption Structures: Olympicenes on the Cu(111) Surface, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 (2016) 1022–1027

    2016

  38. [46]

    St ¨ahler, P

    J. St ¨ahler, P. Rinke, Global and Local Aspects of the Surface Poten- tial Landscape for Energy Level Alignment at Organic-ZnO Interfaces, Chem. Phys. 485-486 (2017) 149–165

    2017

  39. [47]

    Kye, C.-J

    Y .-H. Kye, C.-J. Yu, U.-G. Jong, Y . Chen, A. Walsh, Critical Role of Water in Defect Aggregation and Chemical Degradation of Perovskite Solar Cells, J. Phys. Chem. Lett 9 (2018) 2196–2201

    2018

  40. [48]

    M. H. Du, Density Functional Calculations of Native Defects in CH3NH3PbI3: Effects of Spin-Orbit Coupling and Self-Interaction Error, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 (2015) 1461–1466

    2015

  41. [49]

    A. Buin, P. Pietsch, J. Xu, O. V oznyy, A. H. Ip, R. Comin, E. H. Sargent, Materials Processing Routes to Trap-Free Halide Perovskites, Nano Lett. 14 (2014) 6281–6286

    2014

  42. [50]

    W.-J. Yin, T. Shi, Y . Yan, Unusual defect physics in CH 3NH3PbI3 per- ovskite solar cell absorber, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 (2014) 063903

    2014

  43. [51]

    Kim, S.-H

    J. Kim, S.-H. Lee, J. H. Lee, K.-H. Hong, The Role of Intrinsic Defects in Methylammonium Lead Iodide Perovskite, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 (2014) 1312–1317

    2014

  44. [52]

    Jong, C.-J

    U.-G. Jong, C.-J. Yu, G.-C. Ri, A. P. McMahon, N. M. Harrison, P. R. F. Barnes, A. Walsh, Influence of Water Intercalation and Hydration on Chemical Decomposition and Ion Transport in Methylammonium Lead Halide Perovskites, J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 1067–1074

    2018

  45. [53]

    Aristidou, C

    N. Aristidou, C. Eames, I. Sanchez-Molina, X. Bu1, J. Kosco, M. S. Is- 6 lam, S. A. Haque, Fast Oxygen Di ffusion and Iodide Defects Mediate Oxygen-Induced Degradation of Perovskite Solar Cells, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 15218

    2017

  46. [54]

    Eames, J

    C. Eames, J. M. Frost, P. R. F. Barnes, B. C. O’Regan, A. Walsh, M. S. Islam, Ionic Transport in Hybrid Lead Iodide Perovskite Solar Cells, Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 7497

    2015

  47. [55]

    J. M. Azpiroz, E. Mosconi, J. Bisquert, F. de Angelisa, Defects Migration in Methylammonium Lead Iodide and their Role in Perovskite Solar Cells Operation, Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (2015) 2118–2127

    2015

  48. [56]

    Haruyama, K

    J. Haruyama, K. Sodeyama, L. Han, Y . Tateyama, First-Principles Study of Ion Diffusion in Perovskite Solar Cell Sensitizers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 10048–10051. 7

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.