Quantum photonics on a chip

2) ((1) School of Electrical; (2) Department of Physics; Alina Karabchevsky (1; Aviad Katiyi (1); Beer-Sheva; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Computer Engineering; Israel; Lancaster University; United Kingdom)

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 17 references

Quantum photonics on a chip

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Integrated photonic chips, not bulky optical tables, are the path to scalable quantum technology.

desk verdict A useful but uneven review of integrated quantum photonics: broad coverage and good figures, undermined by several factual errors and one overstated claim about the only viable approach. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03689 v1 pith:BH4CW5SJ submitted 2025-06-04 quant-ph

Aviad Katiyi (1) , Alina Karabchevsky (1 , 2) ((1) School of Electrical , Computer Engineering , Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer-Sheva , Israel , (2) Department of Physics

show 2 more authors

Lancaster University United Kingdom)

This is my paper

classification quant-ph

keywords integratedquantumphotonicsphotoniccircuitssingle-photonsourcesdetectorskeydistributioncomputingsensingsilicon

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that putting quantum photonic circuits—waveguides, single-photon sources, detectors, and gates—on a single chip is the only viable route from bulky tabletop optics to practical quantum technology. The authors assemble component-level evidence: low-loss waveguides in silicon and other materials, bright and increasingly deterministic single-photon sources, high-efficiency detectors, and integrated phase and polarization control. They claim that chip integration solves the alignment, stability, and reproducibility problems of free-space setups and that CMOS-compatible fabrication lets quantum circuits coexist with classical electronics. On this basis they forecast compact quantum processors, ultra-secure quantum key distribution networks, and sensors that beat classical precision limits. The paper is a review and vision statement; it introduces no new experimental data.

What carries the argument

The mechanism carrying the argument is the photonic integrated circuit: a single substrate on which waveguides confine light by total internal reflection and carry single photons through sources, switches, interferometers, and detectors. The decisive advantage is architectural rather than material: integration eliminates the coarse alignment and environmental noise of free-space assemblies, while confinement in waveguides enhances nonlinear interactions such as spontaneous parametric down-conversion and four-wave mixing, making sources brighter. The performance numbers cited—near-unity coupling of quantum dots to waveguides, greater than 90 percent system detection efficiency in superconducting nanowire detectors, and multiplexed heralded sources—serve as the proof that the integrated platform can meet the requirements of quantum applications.

What would settle it

Chart the number of on-chip photon sources, detectors, and gates in successive published demonstrations: if the growth saturates below the scale needed for quantum error correction, or if per-component loss rises with integration scale, the paper's central extrapolation fails. Alternatively, a free-space or fiber system that performs a useful quantum task at a scale and stability no chip can match would directly contradict the 'only viable approach' claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that integrated quantum photonics is the only viable approach to miniaturizing and scaling optical quantum circuits. Replacing free-space arrays of discrete optical components with lithographically defined waveguides shrinks quantum circuits from optical-table scale to a few millimeters, removes sensitivity to vibration and temperature drift, and makes fabrication reproducible and compatible with semiconductor manufacturing. The review walks through each building block—silicon, silicon nitride, III-V, and lithium niobate platforms; quantum-dot and periodically poled nonlinear-crystal sources; avalanche and superconducting nanowire detectors; and interferometers, phase shifters, and polarization rotators—and reads the current performance records as evidence that these components can be combined toward working quantum processors, QKD transceivers, and sensors.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that current trends in low-loss waveguides, brighter single-photon sources, and more efficient detectors will continue far enough to make chip-scale fault-tolerant quantum computing and large-scale QKD networks practical; the paper projects this trajectory without quantifying the gap between today's demonstrations and the required scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Quantum computing hardware will move from lab tables to foundry-fabricated chips, with programmable silicon-photonic processors implementing two-qubit gates and graph states at increasing scale.
Quantum key distribution can become a chip-scale technology: integrated transmitters and receivers in indium phosphide and silicon make secure QKD terminals small, stable, and deployable in networks.
Quantum sensing and metrology will exploit on-chip Mach-Zehnder interferometers and high-Q cavities to reach phase-measurement precision beyond the standard quantum limit outside specialized optics labs.
Silicon photonics' compatibility with existing semiconductor manufacturing will allow quantum photonic circuits to be co-packaged with classical control electronics in hybrid systems.
Because the paper identifies probabilistic photon-pair generation as a significant drawback, its scaling forecast depends on multiplexing those sources and on photon-number-resolving detectors maturing toward the needs of fault-tolerant photonic quantum computing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable consequence the paper leaves implicit: if the scaling forecast is right, the number of photon sources, detectors, and gates in integrated demonstrations should grow steadily year over year, so a plateau in that growth curve would count against the extrapolation.
The 'only viable approach' claim is a necessity claim, but the survey establishes viability, not uniqueness; a fair extension is that integrated photonics is the clear route for photonic platforms specifically, while the broader choice among quantum hardware families is not settled by this paper.
The same waveguide platforms could extend to visible and mid-infrared sensing applications, but the paper's cited loss records are concentrated near telecom wavelengths, so extrapolating to other bands is an open question.
If the component trends continue, one can expect early commercial products to appear in QKD terminals and quantum random number generators before general-purpose quantum processors, because those applications need fewer qubits and can tolerate probabilistic sources.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a review article, not a research paper, and it should be judged as one. It has genuine educational value: the survey of materials platforms, single-photon sources, detectors, and manipulation components is broad, well-organized, and the reproduced figures are well chosen for a newcomer. For someone entering the field, it gives a reasonable map of the landscape. That is the main thing it does well.

The soft spots are real but not load-bearing. There are factual errors that a careful referee should catch. Planck 1900 is not the origin of the single-photon source concept; that is a textbook-level misattribution. Reference 48 (Clauser 1974) is not the first entangled-photon source, and the cited paper is about the photoelectric effect, not entanglement. The acronym SNPADs appears where SNSPDs is meant. These are exactly the kinds of mistakes that erode trust in a review, and they need to be fixed before publication.

There is also a stylistic overstatement in Section III: calling integrated quantum photonics the "only viable approach" to miniaturization and scaling is stronger than the review's own evidence, which shows several competing platforms (SOI, Si3N4, LiNbO3, III-V, KTP). The rest of the paper correctly frames the field as pluralistic. That sentence should be softened to something like "a leading approach" or "the most promising approach."

The historical section has a few other loose ends, but nothing that changes the paper's purpose. The future outlook in Section V is explicitly speculative, and the paper does not claim to demonstrate fault-tolerant computing, so the extrapolation concern is minor.

Who is this for? A graduate student or researcher new to integrated quantum photonics who wants a one-stop overview. It is not for experts, and it contains no new results, which the data availability statement honestly confirms. I would not cite it in my own work because of the errors, but I would consider using it as a teaching entry point once corrected.

My recommendation: send it to peer review, not desk reject. The field is important, the paper is readable, and the errors are fixable. A serious referee should check every historical claim and the "only viable" phrasing. With those revisions, it becomes a serviceable review.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper is a review and vision statement on integrated quantum photonics, covering the historical context of quantum mechanics, the transition from free-space optics to integrated chips, the main on-chip components (materials platforms, single-photon sources, single-photon detectors, photon-manipulation components), and applications in quantum computing, sensing, and cryptography. The authors argue that photonic integrated circuits are a leading path to scaling quantum photonics, and they survey representative experimental demonstrations from the recent literature. The paper explicitly states that no new data were created or analyzed; its contribution is a literature synthesis and an outlook rather than a new experimental or theoretical result.

Significance. The paper's value lies in its role as an accessible survey and perspective: it collects a substantial body of recent work on waveguide-integrated single-photon sources, detectors, and circuits, and it clearly organizes the field by components and applications. It is honest about the absence of new data and framed as a vision piece. However, the review's usefulness depends on the accuracy of its historical and technical claims, and those claims contain several factual errors. The central assertion that integrated photonics is 'the only viable approach' is overstated relative to the evidence cited. With corrections, the paper could serve as a useful introduction to the field for students and researchers entering quantum photonics.

major comments (4)

[Section II] The quantum-mechanics history section contains several factual inaccuracies: Schrödinger's wave mechanics is dated 1925, but his foundational paper (ref. 11) appeared in 1926; Dirac's transformation theory is dated 1925, but his paper (ref. 15) is from 1926; and the claim that the Dirac equation 'added the new variable spin, presented by Wolfgang Pauli in 1924' conflates spin with Pauli's exclusion principle, whereas the electron-spin hypothesis is due to Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck (1925). Because this section is presented as a dedicated historical account, these errors undermine the reliability of the review.
[Section IV.B] The statement 'The concept of a single-photon source was first introduced by Planck in 1900' is historically incorrect. Planck's 1900 work introduced energy quantization for blackbody radiation, not the concept of a single-photon source as understood in modern quantum optics. This claim mischaracterizes the founding literature and is load-bearing for the section's purpose of introducing single-photon sources.
[Section IV.B and Fig. 2c] The sentence 'In 1974, the first source of entangled photons was created48' misattributes the first entangled-photon source. Reference 48 is Clauser's 1974 photoelectric-effect experiment, and the figure caption calls it a 'first free-space single photon source,' not an entangled-photon source. Earlier atomic-cascade sources of entangled photons existed (e.g., Kocher and Commins, 1967; Freedman and Clauser, 1972). This is a substantive error in the historical narrative that should be corrected and the reference/figure caption reconciled.
[Section III] The assertion that integrated quantum photonics 'offers the only viable approach to the miniaturization and scaling up of optical quantum circuits' is an overstatement unsupported by the cited literature. The review itself surveys multiple material platforms and integration strategies, and the cited references do not establish uniqueness. Other approaches, such as free-space micro-optics, fiber-based systems, and hybrid integration, remain viable for some applications. The sentence should be revised to a qualified claim, for example, 'a leading approach.'

minor comments (6)

[Section IV.C] The acronym 'SNPADs' in the paragraph on superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors should read 'SNSPDs' (the correct acronym is used elsewhere in the same section).
[Section II] The discussion of the term 'photon' should be clarified: Troland's 1916 'photon' was a unit of visual stimulation intensity, not the quantum of electromagnetic radiation, as the subsequent quotation from Lewis (1926) already indicates that Lewis's later definition differed.
[Section IV.B, Fig. 2c] The caption of Fig. 2c ('first free-space single photon source') is inconsistent with the text that describes the same reference as an entangled-photon source; the figure and its caption should be checked against the actual content of reference 48.
[Table I] The entries in Table I would be clearer with explicit units and consistent notation; for example, the d(1/2·χ(2)) values for GaAs and LiNbO3 and the χ(2) value for AlN lack units, and the loss column mixes linear and nonlinear losses without labels.
[Section V.B] The discussion of atomic clocks conflates time resolution with clock accuracy; the sentence 'Modern atomic clocks... achieve resolutions far beyond those of classical clocks' should be rephrased to refer to frequency stability or precision rather than time resolution.
[Section I] The full text opens with a paragraph that is verbatim the abstract, and there are redundant sentences such as 'This compatibility paves the way' immediately after the same point is made; the repeated text and duplication should be removed by editing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: review article makes no derived predictions; self-citations are background support, not load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is a review and vision article, not a derivation. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no quantitative predictions; the Data Availability statement explicitly says 'no new data were created or analyzed in this study.' The central assertion in Section III that 'integrated quantum photonics offers the only viable approach to the miniaturization and scaling up of optical quantum circuits' is a survey-level judgment, asserted rather than derived from the cited literature. The self-citations (refs 19, 21, 22, 99, 100) appear in background statements about waveguide structure, waveguide applications, materials importance, and twisted-waveguide polarization manipulation; none of these statements functions as a load-bearing premise for a claimed result that reduces to its own inputs. The future-outlook extrapolations in Section V are explicitly framed as applications and directions, not as predictions derived from the paper's own data or models. No uniqueness theorem is invoked, no ansatz is smuggled in via citation, and no known result is renamed as new. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained in the sense that there is no chain: the paper's claims are citations and opinions, and they are not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no quantitative model, so there are no free parameters or invented entities. It relies on the standard domain assumption that existing technology trends continue. Its claims are supported only by citations to prior work.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption Continued progress in nanofabrication and materials will enable practical, scalable quantum photonic circuits.
The paper's future outlook in Section V extrapolates current trends without quantitative forecasts or new evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum photonics on a chip." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BH4CW5SJ

@misc{pith2026250603689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum photonics on a chip},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BH4CW5SJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03689}
}

read the original abstract

Optical chips for quantum photonics are cutting-edge technology, merging photonics and quantum mechanics to manipulate light at the quantum level. These chips are crucial for advancing quantum computing, secure communication, and precision sensing by integrating photonic components like waveguides, beam splitters, and detectors to manipulate single photons, the fundamental carriers of quantum information. Key advancements in optical chips include low-loss waveguides, efficient single-photon sources, and high-fidelity quantum gates, all essential for scalable quantum circuits. Integrating these circuits on a chip offers significant advantages in miniaturization, stability, and reproducibility over traditional bulk optics setups. Recent breakthroughs in materials science and nanofabrication have propelled the field forward, enabling the production of chips with higher precision and lower defect rates. Silicon photonics, in particular, has become a prominent platform due to its compatibility with existing semiconductor manufacturing processes, facilitating the integration of quantum photonic circuits with classical electronic systems. Here, we share our vision of the future of optical chips for quantum photonics, which hold promise for various applications. In quantum computing, they enable the development of compact and scalable quantum processors. In communication, they provide the foundation for ultra-secure quantum networks through quantum key distribution. In sensing, they allow for high-precision measurements that surpass classical limits. As research progresses, optical chips are expected to play a critical role in realizing the full potential of quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03689 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Single photon sources. (a) Illustration of the emission process of (left) single photon source and (right) photon pair source. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Single photon detectors. (a) Illustration of the concept of a single-photon avalanche photodiode (SPAD). (b) Illustration of the concept [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Quantum technology on a chip. (a) Programmable two-qubit quantum processor for quantum information processing on a chip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[1]

He wrote a paper in 1968 but didn’t publish it till 1982

Quantum key distribution - private key and public key In the 1960s, the idea of Quantum cryptography (private key) was first proposed by Stephen Wiesner. He wrote a paper in 1968 but didn’t publish it till 1982

work page 1968
[2]

Troland as ’ A photon is that intensity of illumination upon the retina of the eye

It is worth noting that Einstein was describing photon, the term ’photon’ was only first introduced in 1916 by Leonard T. Troland as ’ A photon is that intensity of illumination upon the retina of the eye. ’3. Later in 1926, Gilbert N. Lewis used the term photon as the unit of radiant energy - ’ I, therefore, take the liberty of proposing for this hypothe...

work page 1916
[3]

In the SPDC process, one pump photon is split into signal and idler photons

and gallium arsenide (GaAs). In the SPDC process, one pump photon is split into signal and idler photons. Four-wave mix- ing is related to the third order susceptibility χ (3) and is based on the atomic structure of centrosymmetric materials such as silicon oxide (SiO2) and silicon nitride (Si 3N4). In the FWM process, two pump photons are converted into ...

work page 1974
[4]

(a) Programmable two-qubit quantum processor for quantum information processing on a chip (reproduced from 101)

Quantum technology on a chip. (a) Programmable two-qubit quantum processor for quantum information processing on a chip (reproduced from 101). (b) Programmable four-photon graph states on a silicon-on-insulator chip (reproduced from 102). (c) Quantum key distribution (QKD) with low error rate on integrated indium phosphide chip (reproduced from 103). (d) ...

work page 2008
[10]

(a) Illustration of the concept of a single-photon avalanche photodiode (SPAD)

Single photon detectors. (a) Illustration of the concept of a single-photon avalanche photodiode (SPAD). (b) Illustration of the concept of superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) (reproduced from 81). (c) Ge-on-Si lateral avalanche photodiode waveguide (reproduced from82). (d) Superconducting nanowire single-photon detector waveguide (rep...

work page 1980
[11]

In par- allel to Schrodinger’s theory, Werner Heisenberg, with Max Born and Pascual Jordan, presented matrix mechanics for de- scribing quantum systems 12–14

The square of the wave function gives the probability density of find- ing a particle at a specific place at a specific time. In par- allel to Schrodinger’s theory, Werner Heisenberg, with Max Born and Pascual Jordan, presented matrix mechanics for de- scribing quantum systems 12–14. The first consistent quan- tum mechanics unifying both contradicting vie...

work page 1925
[15]

In 1928, he pre- sented the Dirac equation16, a relativistic generalization of the Schrodinger equation, adding the new variable spin, presented by Wolfgang Pauli in

work page 1928
[19]

The first presentation of an optical guided wave structure was in 1966 when a cylindrical fiber was proposed for guiding light20

The light is guided by to- tal internal reflection and propagating in the guiding medium. The first presentation of an optical guided wave structure was in 1966 when a cylindrical fiber was proposed for guiding light20. Since then, optical waveguides have been used for a variety of applications21, from passive components (such as directional couplers and ...

work page 1966

Show all 17 references

[49]

Quantum dot can also be inte- grated on a waveguide by layered semiconductor 50 as shown in Fig. 2e. A layer of gallium selenide (GaSe) single crystal with a thickness of 90 nm was placed on Si3N4 rib waveguide for coupling a single-photon source to a waveguide. The in- tegrat...

1993
[65]

One method for multiplexing is multiplexing many photon pair sources to create a deterministic single-photon source67,68

In 2002, Pittman showed the first experimental demonstration of multiplexing with a periodic time interval using a storage loop and an optical switch66. One method for multiplexing is multiplexing many photon pair sources to create a deterministic single-photon source67,68. Th...

2002
[121]

On the law of distribution of energy in the normal spectrum,

Later in 1984, building upon Stephen Wiesner’s pioneering concept of quantum money and conjugate coding, Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard introduced a groundbreaking protocol for quantum key distribution (QKD), known as BB84. This proto- col leveraged the fundamental princi...

1901
[1900]

However, an ideal single-photon source does not yet exist, and ongoing efforts aim to create sources that closely approximate this ideal

A single-photon source emits one photon at a time with a known and identical mode, such as frequency or temporal mode, which is crucial for quantum technologies. However, an ideal single-photon source does not yet exist, and ongoing efforts aim to create sources that closely a...

2000
[1966]

On-chip nanopho- tonics and future challenges,

pp. 1151–1158. 21A. Karabchevsky, A. Katiyi, A. S. Ang, and A. Hazan, “On-chip nanopho- tonics and future challenges,” Nanophotonics 9, 3733–3753 (2020). 22A. Katiyi and A. Karabchevsky, “Passive and active materials for advanced photonic integrated circuitry in visible and ne...

2020
[2002]

A Rb Bose-Einstein condensate was used to observe a quantum phase transition108. B. Quantum sensing and metrology Quantum sensing and metrology are among the most promising fields within quantum information science. It is the measurement of physical quantities using quantum me...

1982
[2018]

Silica-on- silicon waveguide quantum circuits,

pp. 133–153. 107A. Politi, M. J. Cryan, J. G. Rarity, S. Yu, and J. L. O’brien, “Silica-on- silicon waveguide quantum circuits,” Science 320, 646–649 (2008). 108M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, “Quan- tum phase transition from a superfluid to a ...

2008
[2023]

Open foundry platform for high-performance electronic-photonic integration,

pp. V2–193. 23J. S. Orcutt, B. Moss, C. Sun, J. Leu, M. Georgas, J. Shainline, E. Zgraggen, H. Li, J. Sun, M. Weaver, et al. , “Open foundry platform for high-performance electronic-photonic integration,” Optics express 20, 12222–12232 (2012). 24D. M. Kita, B. Miranda, D. Fave...

2012
[2025]

Optical chips for quantum photonics are cutting-edge technology, merging photonics and quantum mechanics to ma- nipulate light at the quantum level. These chips are crucial for advancing quantum computing, secure communication, and precision sensing by integrating photonic com...

2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

He wrote a paper in 1968 but didn’t publish it till 1982

Quantum key distribution - private key and public key In the 1960s, the idea of Quantum cryptography (private key) was first proposed by Stephen Wiesner. He wrote a paper in 1968 but didn’t publish it till 1982

work page 1968

[2] [2]

Troland as ’ A photon is that intensity of illumination upon the retina of the eye

It is worth noting that Einstein was describing photon, the term ’photon’ was only first introduced in 1916 by Leonard T. Troland as ’ A photon is that intensity of illumination upon the retina of the eye. ’3. Later in 1926, Gilbert N. Lewis used the term photon as the unit of radiant energy - ’ I, therefore, take the liberty of proposing for this hypothe...

work page 1916

[3] [3]

In the SPDC process, one pump photon is split into signal and idler photons

and gallium arsenide (GaAs). In the SPDC process, one pump photon is split into signal and idler photons. Four-wave mix- ing is related to the third order susceptibility χ (3) and is based on the atomic structure of centrosymmetric materials such as silicon oxide (SiO2) and silicon nitride (Si 3N4). In the FWM process, two pump photons are converted into ...

work page 1974

[4] [4]

(a) Programmable two-qubit quantum processor for quantum information processing on a chip (reproduced from 101)

Quantum technology on a chip. (a) Programmable two-qubit quantum processor for quantum information processing on a chip (reproduced from 101). (b) Programmable four-photon graph states on a silicon-on-insulator chip (reproduced from 102). (c) Quantum key distribution (QKD) with low error rate on integrated indium phosphide chip (reproduced from 103). (d) ...

work page 2008

[5] [10]

(a) Illustration of the concept of a single-photon avalanche photodiode (SPAD)

Single photon detectors. (a) Illustration of the concept of a single-photon avalanche photodiode (SPAD). (b) Illustration of the concept of superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) (reproduced from 81). (c) Ge-on-Si lateral avalanche photodiode waveguide (reproduced from82). (d) Superconducting nanowire single-photon detector waveguide (rep...

work page 1980

[6] [11]

In par- allel to Schrodinger’s theory, Werner Heisenberg, with Max Born and Pascual Jordan, presented matrix mechanics for de- scribing quantum systems 12–14

The square of the wave function gives the probability density of find- ing a particle at a specific place at a specific time. In par- allel to Schrodinger’s theory, Werner Heisenberg, with Max Born and Pascual Jordan, presented matrix mechanics for de- scribing quantum systems 12–14. The first consistent quan- tum mechanics unifying both contradicting vie...

work page 1925

[7] [15]

In 1928, he pre- sented the Dirac equation16, a relativistic generalization of the Schrodinger equation, adding the new variable spin, presented by Wolfgang Pauli in

work page 1928

[8] [19]

The first presentation of an optical guided wave structure was in 1966 when a cylindrical fiber was proposed for guiding light20

The light is guided by to- tal internal reflection and propagating in the guiding medium. The first presentation of an optical guided wave structure was in 1966 when a cylindrical fiber was proposed for guiding light20. Since then, optical waveguides have been used for a variety of applications21, from passive components (such as directional couplers and ...

work page 1966