Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improved Factorized Neural Transducer Model For text-only Domain Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.09524 v2 pith:BHIQUMB2 submitted 2023-09-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords neuraltransducerifntadaptationcompareddatasetsfactorizedmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adapting End-to-End ASR models to out-of-domain datasets with text data is challenging. Factorized neural Transducer (FNT) aims to address this issue by introducing a separate vocabulary decoder to predict the vocabulary. Nonetheless, this approach has limitations in fusing acoustic and language information seamlessly. Moreover, a degradation in word error rate (WER) on the general test sets was also observed, leading to doubts about its overall performance. In response to this challenge, we present the improved factorized neural Transducer (IFNT) model structure designed to comprehensively integrate acoustic and language information while enabling effective text adaptation. We assess the performance of our proposed method on English and Mandarin datasets. The results indicate that IFNT not only surpasses the neural Transducer and FNT in baseline performance in both scenarios but also exhibits superior adaptation ability compared to FNT. On source domains, IFNT demonstrated statistically significant accuracy improvements, achieving a relative enhancement of 1.2% to 2.8% in baseline accuracy compared to the neural Transducer. On out-of-domain datasets, IFNT shows relative WER(CER) improvements of up to 30.2% over the standard neural Transducer with shallow fusion, and relative WER(CER) reductions ranging from 1.1% to 2.8% on test sets compared to the FNT model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools