REVIEW 2 cited by
High Density Reflection Spectroscopy I. A case study of GX~339-4
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
High Density Reflection Spectroscopy I. A case study of GX~339-4
read the original abstract
We present a broad band spectral analysis of the black hole binary GX~339-4 with NuSTAR and Swift using high density reflection model. The observations were taken when the source was in low flux hard states (LF) during the outbursts in 2013 and 2015, and in a very high flux soft state (HF) in 2015. The high density reflection model can explain its LF spectra with no requirement for an additional low temperature thermal component. This model enables us to constrain the density in the disc surface of GX~339-4 in different flux states. The disc density in the LF state is $\log(n_{\rm e}/$ cm$^{-3})\approx21$, 100 times higher than the density in the HF state ($\log(n_{\rm e}/$ cm$^{-3})=18.93^{+0.12}_{-0.16}$). A close-to-solar iron abundance is obtained by modelling the LF and HF broad band spectra with variable density reflection model ($Z_{\rm Fe}=1.50^{+0.12}_{-0.04}Z_{\odot}$ and $Z_{\rm Fe}=1.05^{+0.17}_{-0.15}Z_{\odot}$ respectively).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Physically motivated AGN emissivity profiles and their effects on quasar microlensing signatures. 1. Multi-epoch accretion disc size inference
Interpreting composite disc-plus-BLR emission as a single compact disc systematically overestimates microlensing half-light radii, with the bias set mainly by the BLR flux fraction and the compact-disc emissivity shape.
-
Black-Hole Spin Measurements from X-ray Reflection Spectroscopy: Quality Criteria and Community Recommendations
Reflection-based black-hole spin measurements should be graded by detectability, uniqueness, and robustness, and classified into high-confidence, systematics-limited, provisional, or non-assessable tiers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.