Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 46 references

Optimizing Ti substitution for the enhanced densification, ionic conductivity, and microstructure of garnet-type Li$_7$La$_3$Zr$_2$O$_{12}$ solid electrolytes

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-07-01 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Ti substitution at 0.1 atoms per formula unit in LLZO produces 8.08×10^{-5} S cm^{-1} ionic conductivity and 0.37 eV activation energy.

desk verdict Routine Ti-doping scan in LLZO finds a conductivity peak at x=0.1 but the one-order-of-magnitude claim rests on missing same-batch undoped controls and error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.31669 v1 pith:BHU22JHC submitted 2026-06-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords LLZOgarnetsolidelectrolyteTidopingionicconductivityactivationenergydensificationmicrostructuresolid-statebattery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper prepares a series of Ti-substituted garnet electrolytes with the formula Li7La3Zr_{2-x}Ti_x O12 where x ranges from 0 to 0.20 using solid-state synthesis. It measures how the dopant level changes the cubic phase stability, sample density, grain structure, and lithium-ion transport. The 0.10 Ti composition stands out with the highest reported conductivity and lowest activation energy, plus confirmation that transport is ionic rather than electronic. A reader would care because room-temperature conductivity gains of this size could bring all-solid-state batteries closer to practical use by reducing internal resistance without liquid components.

What carries the argument

Controlled Ti substitution for Zr at levels 0 to 0.20 atoms per formula unit, which alters densification, microstructure, and stabilization of the ion-conducting cubic phase.

What would settle it

Preparing the 0.10 Ti and undoped compositions under identical synthesis conditions, reporting conductivity with error bars, and quantifying impurity phases would show whether the order-of-magnitude difference remains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the Li7La3Zr1.9Ti0.1O12 sample achieves an ionic conductivity of 8.08×10^{-5} Scm^{-1} at room temperature together with the lowest activation energy of 0.37 eV in the series, representing a one-order-of-magnitude increase relative to the undoped material, while DC polarization measurements confirm that the conductivity arises predominantly from lithium ions.

Load-bearing premise

The conductivity gain and microstructure improvements are caused by the chosen Ti substitution level rather than uncontrolled differences in sintering temperature, time, or impurity content between samples.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 0.10 Ti sample is positioned as a strong candidate for solid electrolyte applications.
  • Room-temperature ionic conductivity rises by one order of magnitude at the optimal doping level.
  • Activation energy reaches its minimum value of 0.37 eV, aiding ion movement at lower temperatures.
  • DC polarization verifies that conductivity stems from ions rather than electrons.
  • Ti addition improves densification and grain structure across the series.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same systematic dopant-variation approach could be applied to other garnet compositions to map optimal levels.
  • Reduced activation energy may allow battery operation at temperatures below room temperature without severe resistance rise.
  • Microstructural densification could lower grain-boundary resistance, an effect that would need separate impedance modeling to quantify.
  • Long-term stability tests in contact with lithium metal would reveal whether the Ti-modified grains resist interfacial reactions better than undoped material.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports synthesis of the garnet series Li7La3Zr2-xTixO12 (x = 0–0.20) by solid-state reaction, confirmation of the cubic phase by XRD, and electrochemical characterization showing that the x = 0.1 composition delivers the highest room-temperature ionic conductivity (8.08 × 10^{-5} S cm^{-1}) with the lowest activation energy (0.37 eV). The authors attribute a one-order-of-magnitude conductivity increase to Ti-induced improvements in densification and microstructure, supported by SEM/EDS, density measurements, and DC polarization confirming predominantly ionic transport.

Significance. If the conductivity gain can be reproducibly attributed to the Ti substitution level rather than uncontrolled synthesis variables, the result would add a straightforward doping route to the existing literature on garnet electrolytes and could be of practical interest for all-solid-state battery development.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: The central claim that the x = 0.1 composition produces a one-order-of-magnitude conductivity increase 'due to' Ti substitution and resulting microstructure is not supported by a direct side-by-side measurement of the x = 0 pellet prepared in the identical synthesis run; without this benchmark the observed gain cannot be isolated from possible variations in sintering temperature, time, or impurity levels.
  2. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: No error bars, standard deviations from replicate pellets, or full data table listing conductivity and density for every x value are provided; the headline value 8.08 × 10^{-5} S cm^{-1} therefore cannot be assessed for statistical significance relative to the rest of the series.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: notation 'Scm^{-1}' should be written with a space as 'S cm^{-1}' for consistency with standard units.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, with revisions made where the manuscript can be strengthened without misrepresenting the data.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: The central claim that the x = 0.1 composition produces a one-order-of-magnitude conductivity increase 'due to' Ti substitution and resulting microstructure is not supported by a direct side-by-side measurement of the x = 0 pellet prepared in the identical synthesis run; without this benchmark the observed gain cannot be isolated from possible variations in sintering temperature, time, or impurity levels.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this point. The x = 0 composition was synthesized in a separate batch under nominally identical conditions, but batch-to-batch variations cannot be fully excluded. We have revised the Abstract and Results sections to present the conductivity values as an observed trend across the Ti-doped series relative to our own x = 0 data (rather than claiming a direct causal isolation from synthesis variables). A clarifying sentence has been added noting the limitation of non-identical runs. We do not have additional pellets from a single identical synthesis run to provide a stricter benchmark. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: No error bars, standard deviations from replicate pellets, or full data table listing conductivity and density for every x value are provided; the headline value 8.08 × 10^{-5} S cm^{-1} therefore cannot be assessed for statistical significance relative to the rest of the series.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of error bars and a complete tabulated dataset limits assessment of significance. We have added a new table (Table 2) reporting room-temperature ionic conductivity, activation energy, and relative density for all x values (0–0.20), together with standard deviations calculated from replicate pellets (minimum n = 3 where repeats were performed). Error bars have been included on the conductivity-versus-x plot and Arrhenius figures. These changes allow direct evaluation of the x = 0.1 result relative to the series. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: purely experimental reporting of direct measurements

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental materials study reporting synthesis of Li7La3Zr2-xTixO12 (x=0-0.2) via solid-state reaction, followed by XRD phase confirmation, SEM/EDS microstructure, density, EIS ionic conductivity, and DC polarization. No equations, fitted parameters, predictive models, or derivation chains appear. Conductivity values (e.g., 8.08×10^{-5} S cm^{-1} at x=0.1) and Ea=0.37 eV are reported as measured quantities. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatzes, and no 'predictions' reduce to inputs by construction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks as standard characterization reporting.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No mathematical derivations, free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are present; the work consists of experimental synthesis and characterization measurements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimizing Ti substitution for the enhanced densification, ionic conductivity, and microstructure of garnet-type Li$_7$La$_3$Zr$_2$O$_{12}$ solid electrolytes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BHU22JHC

@misc{pith2026260631669,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimizing Ti substitution for the enhanced densification, ionic conductivity, and microstructure of garnet-type Li$_7$La$_3$Zr$_2$O$_12$ solid electrolytes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BHU22JHC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.31669}
}
abstract

Garnet-type lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide Li$_7$La$_3$Zr$_2$O$_{12}$ (LLZO) is a favorable solid electrolyte for all-solid-state Li-ion batteries due to its wide electrochemical stability, compatible ionic conductivity, and good safety. However, further improvement in ionic conductivity is required for its practical applications. In this work, titanium (Ti) is doped into LLZO to enhance its Li-ion transport properties and structural stability. The series Li$_7$La$_3$Zr$_{2-x}$Ti$_x$O$_{12}$ has been successfully synthesized using conventional solid-state reaction method. The content of Ti has been varied from 0 to 0.20 atoms per formula unit (a.p.f.u). The conducting cubic phase has been confirmed by the X-ray diffraction technique (XRD). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) have been used for structural analysis, and elemental distribution. Density measurements have been carried out for all the samples. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy revealed that the high ionic conductivity of $8.08\times 10^{-5}$ Scm$^{-1}$ is offered by the Li$_7$La$_3$Zr$_{1.9}$Ti$_{0.1}$O$_{12}$ sample, which has the lowest activation energy of 0.37 eV. The DC polarization analysis verified that the main contribution to conductivity in the 0.10 Ti sample comes from ions. A one order of magnitude increase in room temperature ionic conductivity is observed for the 0.10 Ti sample, making it a strong candidate for solid electrolyte applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31669 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fig.1:(a) Powder X-ray diffraction profiles of Li [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fig.2: Lattice constant of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fig.3: SEM images of Li [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histogram of average particle size distribution of 0.10 Ti sample. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fig.5: Elemental mapping and EDS analysis of 0.10 Ti sample [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fig.6: a) Room temperature impedance plots for the series Li [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Fig.7: a) Temperature-dependent ionic conductivity (Arrhenius plots) and b) effect of Ti substitution on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fig.8: DC conductivity graph for 0.10 Ti sample. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction: The increasing deployment of renewable energy storage systems, portable electronics, and electric vehicles has driven the need for efficient and high-performance energy storage systems. Li-ion secondary batteries have drawn a lot of interest among many electrochemical storage techniques due to their benefits, which include light weight, low ...

  2. [2]

    Sample preparation The samples of the series Li7La3Zr2-xTixO12 (x=0 - 0.20) were prepared using a conventional solid-state reaction method in ambient atmosphere

    Experimental section: 2.1. Sample preparation The samples of the series Li7La3Zr2-xTixO12 (x=0 - 0.20) were prepared using a conventional solid-state reaction method in ambient atmosphere. High-purity Li2CO3 (Merck, >ௗ99.9%), La2O3 (Sigma Aldrich, >ௗ99.99%), ZrO2 (Sigma Aldrich, >ௗ99.9%), and TiO2 (Merck, >ௗ99.9%) were used as precursors. An additional 10...

  3. [3]

    X-Ray Diffraction Analysis The X-ray diffraction patterns of samples of the series Li7La3Zr2-xTixO12 (x = 0 - 0.20) are presented in Fig.1(a)

    Results and discussion 3.1. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis The X-ray diffraction patterns of samples of the series Li7La3Zr2-xTixO12 (x = 0 - 0.20) are presented in Fig.1(a). All the prepared samples possessed the cubic garnet phase with space group Ia-3d, which is confirmed from the JCPDS file no.45.0109. The diffraction peaks are indexed with their respecti...

  4. [4]

    Thangadurai, S

    V. Thangadurai, S. Narayanan, D. Pinzaru, Garnet-type solid-state fast Li ion conductors for Li batteries: Critical review, Chemical Society Reviews 43 (2014) 4714–4727. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00020j

  5. [5]

    Kotobuki, H

    M. Kotobuki, H. Munakata, K. Kanamura, Y. Sato, T. Yoshida, Compatibility of Li[sub 7]La[sub 3]Zr[sub 2]O[sub 12] Solid Electrolyte to All-Solid-State Battery Using Li Metal Anode, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 157 (2010) A1076. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3474232

  6. [6]

    Zheng, Y

    Y. Zheng, Y. Shen, J. Guo, J. Li, J. Wang, D. Ning, Y. Liu, Y. Huang, Y. Tang, Y. Deng, H. Yan, H. Shao, Recent advances in solid-state lithium batteries based on anode engineering, Nano Research Energy 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.26599/NRE.2024.9120118

  7. [7]

    Owens, Solid state electrolytes: Overview of materials and applications during the last third of the Twentieth Century, Journal of Power Sources 90 (2000) 2–8

    B.B. Owens, Solid state electrolytes: Overview of materials and applications during the last third of the Twentieth Century, Journal of Power Sources 90 (2000) 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 7753(00)00436-5

  8. [8]

    Y. Kato, S. Hori, T. Saito, K. Suzuki, M. Hirayama, A. Mitsui, M. Yonemura, H. Iba, R. Kanno, High- power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors, Nature Energy 1 (2016) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.30

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Greatbatch, J.H

    W. Greatbatch, J.H. Lee, W. Mathias, M. Eldridge, J.R. Moser, A.A. Schneider, The Solid-State Lithium Battery: A New Improved Chemical Power Source for Implantable Cardiac Pacemakers, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering BME-18 (1971) 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1109/TB...

  2. [10]

    X. Li, R. Li, S. Chu, K. Liao, R. Cai, W. Zhou, Z. Shao, Crystal structure and prepartation of LLZO solid-state electrolyte and doping impacts on the conductivity, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 794 (2019) 347–357. https://www-sciencedirect-com.anywhere.lib.kyushu- u.ac.jp/sc...

  3. [12]

    A. V. Deshpande, V.K. Deshpande, Influence of LiCl addition on the electrical conductivity of Li2O/B2O3/SiO2 glass system, Solid State Ionics 154–155 (2002) 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00700-2

  4. [13]

    Murugan, V

    R. Murugan, V. Thangadurai, W. Weppner, Fast lithium ion conduction in garnet-type Li7La 3Zr2O12, Angewandte Chemie - International Edition 46 (2007) 7778–7781. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200701144

  5. [14]

    S. Guo, Y. Sun, A. Cao, Garnet-type Solid-state Electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12: Crystal Structure, Element Doping and Interface Strategies for Solid-state Lithium Batteries, Chemical Research in Chinese Universities 36 (2020) 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0116-0

  6. [15]

    Meesala, Y.K

    Y. Meesala, Y.K. Liao, A. Jena, N.H. Yang, W.K. Pang, S.F. Hu, H. Chang, C.E. Liu, S.C. Liao, J.M. Chen, X. Guo, R.S. Liu, An efficient multi-doping strategy to enhance Li-ion conductivity in the garnet- type solid electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 7 (...

  7. [16]

    Z. Hu, H. Liu, H. Ruan, R. Hu, Y. Su, L. Zhang, High Li-ion conductivity of Al-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 synthesized by solid-state reaction, Ceramics International 42 (2016) 12156–12160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.149

  8. [17]

    Y. Tian, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, Y. Zhou, Effects of Ga–Ba Co-doping on the morphology and conductivity of Li7La3Zr2O12 electrolyte synthesized by sol-gel method, Ceramics International 48 (2022) 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.181

  9. [18]

    Y.T. Chen, A. Jena, W.K. Pang, V.K. Peterson, H.S. Sheu, H. Chang, R.S. Liu, Voltammetric Enhancement of Li-Ion Conduction in Al-Doped Li7-xLa3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121 (2017) 15565–15573. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04004

  10. [19]

    Aktaş, O.M

    S. Aktaş, O.M. Özkendir, Y.R. Eker, Ş. Ateş, Ü. Atav, G. Çelik, W. Klysubun, Study of the local structure and electrical properties of gallium substituted LLZO electrolyte materials, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 792 (2019) 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.049

  11. [20]

    Liang, X

    X. Liang, X. Li, X. Wu, Q. Gai, X. Zhang, Effect of Zn-Incorporation into Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte on Structural Stability and Electrical Conductivity: First-Principles Study, International Journal of Electrochemical Science 15 (2020) 11123–11136. https://doi.org/10.2096...

  12. [21]

    Xiang, Y

    X. Xiang, Y. Liu, F. Chen, W. Yang, J. Yang, X. Ma, D. Chen, K. Su, Q. Shen, L. Zhang, Crystal structure and lithium ionic transport behavior of Li site doped Li7La3Zr2O12, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 40 (2020) 3065–3071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.02.054

  13. [22]

    M. Aote, A. V. Deshpande, A. Khapekar, K. Parchake, Influence of Ga-Ge doping on the structural and electrical properties of Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes, Materials Letters 377 (2024) 137462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2024.137462

  14. [23]

    M. Aote, A. V. Deshpande, Study of Ge-doped garnet type Li7La3Zr2O12 as solid electrolyte for Li-ion 14 battery application, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-12338-5

  15. [24]

    M. Aote, A. V. Deshpande, Effect of Ca doping on Li ion conductivity of Ge and Ta doped garnet LLZO, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 190 (2024) 111980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.111980

  16. [25]

    T. Ning, Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, X. Shen, Y. Luo, T. Liu, P. Liu, Z. Luo, A. Lu, The effect of a Ta, Sr co- doping strategy on physical and electrochemical properties of Li7La3Zr2O12 electrolytes, Solid State Ionics 379 (2022) 115917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2022.115917

  17. [26]

    X. Li, R. Li, S. Chu, K. Liao, R. Cai, W. Zhou, Z. Shao, Rational design of strontium antimony co- doped Li7La3Zr2O12 electrolyte membrane for solid-state lithium batteries, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 794 (2019) 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.274

  18. [27]

    L. Shen, L. Wang, Z. Wang, C. Jin, L. Peng, X. Pan, J. Sun, R. Yang, Preparation and characterization of Ga and Sr co-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 garnet-type solid electrolyte, Solid State Ionics 339 (2019) 114992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.027

  19. [28]

    C. Lin, Y. Tang, J. Song, L. Han, J. Yu, A. Lu, Sr- and Nb-co-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte with Al2O3 addition towards high ionic conductivity, Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing 124 (2018) 0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-018-1849-1

  20. [29]

    X. Zhou, L. Huang, O. Elkedim, Y. Xie, Y. Luo, Q. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, Sr2+ and Mo6+ co- doped Li7La3Zr2O12 with superior ionic conductivity, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 891 (2022) 161906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161906

  21. [30]

    Z. Cao, X. Cao, X. Liu, W. He, Y. Gao, J. Liu, J. Zeng, Effect of Sb-Ba codoping on the ionic conductivity of Li7La3Zr2O12 ceramic, Ceramics International 41 (2015) 6232–6236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.030

  22. [31]

    X. Liu, M. Gao, Y. Liu, L. Xiong, J. Chen, Improving the room temperature ionic conductivity of Al-Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 ceramics by Ba and Y or Ba and W co-doping, Ceramics International 45 (2019) 13488–13495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.052

  23. [32]

    X.Z. Liu, L. Ding, Y.Z. Liu, L.P. Xiong, J. Chen, X.L. Luo, Room-temperature ionic conductivity of Ba, Y, Al co-doped Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte after sintering, Rare Metals 40 (2021) 2301–2306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01526-x

  24. [33]

    Y. Luo, X. Li, Y. Zhang, L. Ge, H. Chen, L. Guo, Electrochemical properties and structural stability of Ga- and Y- co-doping in Li7La3Zr2O12 ceramic electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries, Electrochimica Acta 294 (2019) 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.078

  25. [34]

    Recycling, 掺杂改性与形变驱动回收再利用 Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 固态电解质电化学性能研究, 48 (2024) 25689–25695

    D. Recycling, 掺杂改性与形变驱动回收再利用 Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 固态电解质电化学性能研究, 48 (2024) 25689–25695. 15

  26. [35]

    Janani, S

    N. Janani, S. Ramakumar, S. Kannan, R. Murugan, Optimization of Lithium Content and Sintering Aid for Maximized Li+ Conductivity and Density in Ta-Doped Li7La3Zr2O12, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 98 (2015) 2039–2046. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.13578

  27. [36]

    X. Liu, Y. Li, T. Yang, Z. Cao, W. He, Y. Gao, J. Liu, G. Li, Z. Li, High lithium ionic conductivity in the garnet-type oxide Li7−2xLa3Zr2−xMoxO12 (x=0-0.3) ceramics by sol-gel method, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 100 (2017) 1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14736

  28. [37]

    Wakudkar, A

    P. Wakudkar, A. V. Deshpande, Enhancement of ionic conductivity by addition of LiAlO2 in Li6.6La3Zr1.6Sb0.4O12 for lithium ion battery, Solid State Ionics 345 (2020) 115185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115185

  29. [38]

    M. Aote, A. V. Deshpande, V. Sirsulwar, P. Padaganur, Neha, A. Pradhan, Impact of Ce Substitution on Structural and Electrochemical Properties of Ga-Doped Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte, Journal of Electronic Materials 55 (2026) 5406–5416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664...

  30. [39]

    S. Hu, Y.F. Li, R. Yang, Z. Yang, L. Wang, Structure and ionic conductivity of Li7La3Zr2−xGexO12 garnet-like solid electrolyte for all solid state lithium ion batteries, Ceramics International 44 (2018) 6614–6618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.065

  31. [40]

    J.F. Wu, W.K. Pang, V.K. Peterson, L. Wei, X. Guo, Garnet-Type Fast Li-Ion Conductors with High Ionic Conductivities for All-Solid-State Batteries, ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 9 (2017) 12461–12468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b00614

  32. [41]

    Miara, S.P

    L.J. Miara, S.P. Ong, Y. Mo, W.D. Richards, Y. Park, J.M. Lee, H.S. Lee, G. Ceder, Effect of Rb and Ta doping on the ionic conductivity and stability of the garnet Li7+2x-y(La3-xRbx)(Zr 2-yTay)O12 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.375, 0 ≤ y ≤ 1) Superionic conductor: A first principles investigatio...

  33. [42]

    X. Chen, T. Wang, W. Lu, T. Cao, M. Xue, B. Li, C. Zhang, Synthesis of Ta and Ca doped Li7La3Zr2O12 solid-state electrolyte via simple solution method and its application in suppressing shuttle effect of Li-S battery, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 744 (2018) 386–394. https:/...

  34. [43]

    Saran, Y.R

    S. Saran, Y.R. Eker, Ş. Ateş, G. Çelik, H. Baveghar, O.M. Özkendir, Ü. Atav, W. Klysubun, The effect of Ti to the crystal structure of Li7-3xMxLa3Zr1.8Ti0.2O12 (M= Ga, In) garnet-type solid electrolytes as a second dopant, Advances in Applied Ceramics 121 (2022) 238–246. https...

  35. [44]

    J. Wu, Y. Lu, H. Wu, Q. Luo, Z. Bai, J. Li, Preparation and electrochemical properties of LLZO co- doping with Al and Ti for all solid-state battery, Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry 27 (2023) 2499–2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05532-8

  36. [45]

    C. Shao, Z. Yu, H. Liu, Z. Zheng, N. Sun, C. Diao, Enhanced ionic conductivity of titanium doped Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte, Electrochimica Acta 225 (2017) 345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.140. 16

  37. [46]

    M. Aote, A. V. Deshpande, Enhancement in Li-ion conductivity through Co-doping of Ge and Ta in garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte, Ceramics International 49 (2023) 40011–40018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.09.330

  38. [47]

    Wakudkar, A

    P. Wakudkar, A. V. Deshpande, CeO2 modified Li6.6La3Zr1.6Sb0.4O12 composite ceramic electrolyte for lithium battery application, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 155 (2021) 110092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110092

Pith tools

Reviewed July 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.