Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Enhancing far-field thermal radiation by Floquet engineering

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A silicon-carbide film under periodic modulation can emit far-field heat beyond the equilibrium blackbody limit, and keeps emitting at zero temperature, via surface-phonon-polariton frequency conversion.

desk verdict Floquet-sideband coupling of surface phonon polaritons to propagating modes is a real mechanism, but the quantitative claims are not yet established because the zero-thickness sheet model fails for their 0.529 μm film. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16688 v1 pith:BI6SZAJA submitted 2025-07-22 cond-mat.mes-hall

Huimin Zhu , Yuhua Ren , Hui Pan , Gaomin Tang , Lei Zhang , Jian-Sheng Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Floquetengineeringthermalradiationsurfacephononpolaritonsfar-fieldheattransfernonequilibriumGreen'sfunctiontime-modulatedmaterialszero-temperatureemissionsiliconcarbide
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether periodic time modulation of a material can let far-field thermal radiation exceed the equilibrium thermal fluctuation limit. Using a Floquet nonequilibrium Green's function formalism, the authors model a silicon-carbide film whose electric susceptibility is modulated at frequency $\Omega$. They show that the modulation couples evanescent surface phonon polaritons to propagating photons, enabling far-field emission beyond the undriven level, with a several-fold enhancement that grows with modulation strength. Even at zero temperature, the film emits a finite radiative flux. If correct, this establishes time modulation as a mechanism for active control of far-field thermal radiation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Floquet nonequilibrium Green's function for the photon field, built from a susceptibility split into an equilibrium part and a dissipationless periodic drive. The drive creates sidebands at frequencies $\mathcal{E}_n = \mathcal{E} + n\hbar\Omega$, and the Floquet transmission matrices $\mathbf{t}^s$ and $\mathbf{t}^p$ couple channels with different $n$. This coupling transfers spectral weight from evanescent surface phonon polaritons, which normally have in-plane momentum $q_\parallel > k_0$, into propagating modes with $q_\parallel < k_0$, effectively frequency-converting the surface modes into far-field radiation.

What would settle it

A finite-thickness slab calculation with the same parameters ($\Delta\chi$, $\Omega$, and $T$) would settle the central claim: if it does not reproduce the sideband peaks or the zero-temperature flux of about $602.9\ \mathrm{W/m^2}$, the sheet model is the point of failure. An experiment could check whether a periodically pumped SiC film emits a far-field spectrum with peaks spaced by $\hbar\Omega$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a thin SiC film with susceptibility $\chi(t,t') = \chi_0(t-t') + 2\Delta\chi \delta(t-t')\cos(\Omega t)$, the far-field heat flux $I_\infty$ is no longer bounded by the equilibrium thermal emission of the undriven film. The driven film radiates into the vacuum at a rate that grows with $\Delta\chi$, reaching about a 6.4-fold enhancement at $\Delta\chi = 3$; at zero temperature it still emits $|I_\infty| = 602.9\ \mathrm{W/m^2}$ for $\Delta\chi = 2.5$ and $\hbar\Omega = \hbar\omega_T$. The extra energy comes from the work done by the modulation, consistent with energy conservation $I_\infty + I_O + I_d = 0$. The paper argues that the zero-temperature emission does not violate the third law because the drive keeps the film in a nonequilibrium state, with negative-frequency Floquet channels giving $N(0,\mathcal{E}_n) = -1$ for $\mathcal{E}_n < 0$. The central claim is that time modulation bridges the near-field and far-field regimes by shifting evanescent surface modes by $n\Omega$ into the propagating light cone.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation treats the 0.529 $\mu$m film as a zero-thickness sheet with all polarization current concentrated at the plane $z=0$; if this idealization is inaccurate, the predicted dispersion relations and emission rates would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Far-field emission from a single modulated film can exceed the equilibrium blackbody level, with enhancement factors from a few-fold at room temperature up to about 6.4 at $\Delta\chi = 3$.
  • A zero-temperature modulated film emits a finite radiative flux (about $602.9\ \mathrm{W/m^2}$ at $\Delta\chi = 2.5$), with the energy supplied by the work done by the modulation.
  • The emission spectrum becomes a comb of sideband peaks spaced by the modulation frequency $\Omega$, each corresponding to an $n$-photon conversion of surface modes into propagating modes.
  • The modulation strength acts as a control knob: increasing $\Delta\chi$ monotonically increases the far-field radiation.
  • Because the driven part of the susceptibility is dissipationless, the enhancement is not absorption-driven; all thermal radiation originates from equilibrium fluctuations, and the added far-field flux is supplied by the drive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is generic, other polaritonic materials (e.g. hexagonal boron nitride or doped semiconductors) should show similar Floquet sideband emission at frequencies set by their surface-phonon-polariton bands.
  • The zero-temperature emission implies a continuous energy cost from the drive; quantifying that cost against the emitted flux would give an efficiency for converting pump work into far-field photons.
  • The sheet approximation could be tested by repeating the calculation for a finite-thickness slab; a discrepancy would shift the quantitative predictions, including the $602.9\ \mathrm{W/m^2}$ zero-temperature value.
  • The same frequency-conversion mechanism might be used to extract heat from a cold object into a hotter far field, thereby acting as an active radiative refrigerator.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript develops a Floquet nonequilibrium Green's function formalism for the far-field thermal emission of a periodically time-modulated SiC film. The authors derive Landauer-like spectral formulas for the energy flux into zero-temperature baths at infinity, compute the emission spectrum, the effective photon distribution, and the total energy flux as a function of temperature and modulation strength. They report that time modulation couples evanescent surface phonon polaritons to propagating modes, producing a far-field flux that exceeds the unmodulated emission of the same film, including a finite flux at T=0 (|I∞|=602.9 W/m² at Δχ=2.5 and ℏΩ=ℏω_T) and up to a roughly 6.4-fold enhancement at Δχ=3.

Significance. If the quantitative results survive a full-slab treatment, this work would be a valuable theoretical demonstration of active Floquet control of far-field thermal radiation, with falsifiable predictions of zero-temperature emission driven by external modulation. The derivation in the Supplemental is detailed and internally consistent: the unmodulated limit reduces to the standard emission formula, and the T=0 emission follows from the negative-frequency sideband terms in the Landauer formula. The paper also provides a clear physical mechanism, namely, Floquet-induced conversion of evanescent surface modes into propagating modes. However, the significance is currently tempered by the reliance on a zero-thickness sheet model that is not validated for the parameters used; the headline numbers are therefore not yet quantitatively established.

major comments (1)
  1. [Supplemental Eqs. (S19)-(S20), Eq. (5), Eqs. (9)-(10), and Numerical results] The zero-thickness sheet model is load-bearing. The self-energy is localized at z=0 via δ(z)δ(z''), with Π0^r = -a ε0 E^2 χ0/ℏ^2, which is the thin-sheet limit in which the field is assumed uniform over the film thickness a. For the p-polarized surface mode near ω≈26 THz, using the Drude-Lorentz parameters in the Numerical results section, ε≈-10.4+0.57i and q²-k0²≈1.06×10^11 m^-2, giving Im(k_z)≈1.9×10^6 m^-1 and an in-film decay length ≈0.5 μm, comparable to a=0.529 μm; the optical thickness |ε-1|k0 a is also of order 3. The sheet model therefore cannot be assumed accurate for the surface modes that drive the enhancement, because it neglects field variation across the film and multiple reflections at the two interfaces. All quantitative claims—|I∞|=602.9 W/m² at T=0, the 6.4-fold enhancement at Δχ=3, and the spectra in Figs. 1(b) and 2(c)—are computed in this model. A full-slab calculation, or an explicit error estimate quantifying the validity of the sheet limit for these parameters, is needed to establish the quantitative central claims. The qualitative Floquet-coupling mechanism may survive a slab treatment, but the numbers are not yet supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase "surpasses the limit imposed by the equilibrium thermal fluctuations" is not precisely quantified; the comparison baseline is the unmodulated film with Δχ=0, not a universal bound such as the blackbody limit. Please clarify this to avoid overstating the result.
  2. [Eq. (3)] The integration domain is denoted |q⊥|<k0, but q is the in-plane wavevector (denoted q§ elsewhere). Use a consistent notation, such as q∥, to avoid confusion with the out-of-plane component.
  3. [Numerical results] The Floquet truncation order l is not stated; please report l and show that I∞ is converged with respect to l for at least one representative parameter set.
  4. [System and sign convention] The sentence "I∞ is the total energy emitted by the two baths at +∞ and −∞" is misleading because the baths at infinity are at zero temperature and absorb energy; consider rewording to "the energy current into the baths at infinity."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Floquet NEGF calculation is self-contained, with all central quantities computed from stated model inputs rather than fitted to or defined by the claimed output.

full rationale

The paper derives the far-field thermal emission from a Floquet nonequilibrium Green's function formalism. The central quantities, including the far-field current I∞, the equilibrium contribution IO, the zero-temperature flux |I∞| = 602.9 W/m², and the enhancement factor R, are computed from the model inputs: the Drude-Lorentz permittivity of SiC, the film thickness a, the modulation strength Δχ, and the modulation frequency Ω. No parameter is fitted to the target result, and the baseline comparison I∞(Δχ)/I∞(Δχ=0) is a computed ratio of two values from the same formalism, not a fit renamed as a prediction. The zero-temperature emission follows from the Floquet sideband occupation factors N(T,ω_n) for negative ω_n in Eqs. (S34), (S38), (3), and (4), so it is a derived consequence rather than an assumed conclusion. The paper relies on prior work by the same authors for the general NEGF framework and for the definition of the effective photon distribution, but the needed expressions are restated or rederived in the main text and Supplemental Material, including the Dyson equation solution and the Meir-Wingreen-type current formula. Those self-citations are therefore contextual rather than load-bearing. The zero-thickness sheet approximation, which localizes the self-energy at z=0 in Supplemental Eqs. (S19)-(S20), is a modeling assumption that may affect quantitative accuracy for a 0.529 μm film, but it is not circular: it is an independent approximation to the physical system, not an input that already contains the claimed emission enhancement. The qualitative and quantitative claims are nontrivial consequences of the stated Floquet transport equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All numbers entering the calculation are either standard material parameters from the literature or drive parameters chosen by the authors. There are no fitted parameters and no new physical entities. The main modeling assumption is the zero-thickness sheet treatment of the film, which enters the Dyson equation and is not validated against a slab calculation.

free parameters (2)
  • Modulation strength Δχ = 2.5 (and 3.0 in Fig. 3c)
    Drive amplitude, chosen by hand to demonstrate enhancement; not fitted to data.
  • Modulation frequency Ω = ℏΩ = 30.9 meV and ℏω_T = 98.4 meV
    Drive frequency, scanned in the paper; not fitted to a target result.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Floquet-Bloch theorem and Floquet representation of periodically time-modulated operators
    Used throughout the supplemental to convert the time-dependent Dyson and Keldysh equations into block-matrix form (Supplemental Sec. I).
  • domain assumption Fluctuation-dissipation theorem for the equilibrium part of the film and the baths at infinity
    Applied in Supplemental Sec. IV to express Keldysh self-energies as Π_K = (2N+1)(Π_r - Π_a) for the equilibrium component and the baths.
  • domain assumption The driven part χd is dissipationless, so Π_r_d = Π_a_d and Π_K_d = 0
    Stated in main text ('Since the driven part χd(t,t') is dissipationless, all thermal radiation originates from the equilibrium component') and used to derive Eq. (S40).
  • ad hoc to paper Zero-thickness sheet model for the film: self-energy localized at z=0 with δ(z)δ(z'')
    Used in Supplemental Eqs. (S19)-(S20) to solve the Dyson equation analytically; the physical film has finite thickness a=0.529 μm.
  • domain assumption Drude-Lorentz permittivity model for SiC with ε∞=6.7, ω_L/2π=29.1 THz, ω_T/2π=23.8 THz, Γ/2π=0.14 THz
    Taken from prior literature (refs 43, 54) to define the material response in the numerical results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancing far-field thermal radiation by Floquet engineering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BI6SZAJA

@misc{pith2026250716688,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancing far-field thermal radiation by Floquet engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BI6SZAJA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16688}
}
read the original abstract

Time modulation introduces a dynamic degree of freedom for tailoring thermal radiation beyond the limits of static materials. Here we investigate far-field thermal radiation from a periodically time-modulated SiC film under the Floquet nonequilibrium Green's function framework. We show that time modulation enables radiative energy transfer into the far field that surpasses the limit imposed by the equilibrium thermal fluctuations. This enhancement originates from the modulation-induced coupling between evanescent surface phonon polaritons and propagating modes, effectively bridging the energy and momentum mismatch through frequency conversion. Notably, even at zero temperature, the film emits a finite radiative heat flux due to nonequilibrium photon occupation generated by the modulation. The radiative output grows with increasing modulation strength, highlighting the role of external work in driving far-field emission. These results establish time modulation as an effective mechanism for bridging near-field and far-field regimes, opening new pathways for active thermal radiation control.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16688 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of thermal radiation from a film with thickness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) shows the dispersion relations for the surface modes on an unmodulated SiC film, along with the vacuum light line É = ck0 (black line). The surface modes, due to their higher energy density, significantly enhance energy transfer in the near field [56]. However, these modes are inac￾cessible in the far field, which is the focus of our study. From the dispersion relations, the in-plane momentum q§ of the sur￾face … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (b). The results show that time modulation significantly affects the photon distribution of the SiC film, driving it into a nonequilibrium state, while the baths at infinity remain in equilibrium. Therefore, the energy radiation at T = 0 is a result of the SiC film in a nonequilibrium state. Further￾more, for the entire time-modulated system at T = 0, time modulation drives the SiC film into a nonequilibrium state w… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Thermal radiation at the nanoscale and applications,

    Pierre-Olivier Chapuis, Bong Jae Lee, and Alejandro Ro- driguez, “Thermal radiation at the nanoscale and applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 220401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Nanophotonic en- gineering of far-field thermal emitters,

    Denis G Baranov, Y uzhe Xiao, Igor A Nechepurenko, Alex Krasnok, Andrea Al `u, and Mikhail A Kats, “Nanophotonic en- gineering of far-field thermal emitters,” Nat. Mater. 18, 920– 930 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Spectral control of near-field thermal radiation via photonic band engi- neering of two-dimensional photonic crystal slabs,

    Takuya Inoue, Takashi Asano, and Susumu Noda, “Spectral control of near-field thermal radiation via photonic band engi- neering of two-dimensional photonic crystal slabs,” Opt. Ex- press 26, 32074–32082 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Meshed doped silicon pho- tonic crystals for manipulating near-field thermal radiation,

    Mahmoud Elzouka and Sidy Ndao, “Meshed doped silicon pho- tonic crystals for manipulating near-field thermal radiation,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 204, 56–62 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Smart thermal management with near-field thermal radiation,

    Ivan Latella, Svend-Age Biehs, and Philippe Ben-Abdallah, “Smart thermal management with near-field thermal radiation,” Opt. Express 29, 24816–24833 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Near-field radiative thermal transport: From theory to experiment,

    Bai Song, Anthony Fiorino, Edgar Meyhofer, and Pramod Reddy, “Near-field radiative thermal transport: From theory to experiment,” AIP Adv. 5, 053503 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Nor- malspectrum,

    Max Planck, “Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Nor- malspectrum,” Ann. Phys. 309, 553–563 (1901)

    work page 1901

  8. [8]

    Theodore L Bergman, Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer (John Wiley & Sons, 2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Near-field radiative heat transfer in many-body systems,

    S.-A. Biehs, R. Messina, P . S. V enkataram, A. W. Rodriguez, J. C. Cuevas, and P . Ben-Abdallah, “Near-field radiative heat transfer in many-body systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025009 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Radiative heat transfer at the nanoscale,

    Emmanuel Rousseau, Alessandro Siria, Guillaume Jourdan, Se- bastian V olz, Fabio Comin, Jo¨el Chevrier, and Jean-Jacques Gr- effet, “Radiative heat transfer at the nanoscale,” Nat. Photonics 3, 514–517 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    Tailoring near-field thermal radiation between metallo- dielectric multilayers using coupled surface plasmon polari- tons,

    Mikyung Lim, Jaeman Song, Seung S Lee, and Bong Jae Lee, “Tailoring near-field thermal radiation between metallo- dielectric multilayers using coupled surface plasmon polari- tons,” Nat. Commun. 9, 4302 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Sur- face phonon polaritons mediated energy transfer between nanoscale gaps,

    Sheng Shen, Arvind Narayanaswamy, and Gang Chen, “Sur- face phonon polaritons mediated energy transfer between nanoscale gaps,” Nano Lett. 9, 2909–2913 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Near-field heat transfer between graphene/hBN multilayers,

    Bo Zhao, Brahim Guizal, Zhuomin M. Zhang, Shanhui Fan, and Mauro Antezza, “Near-field heat transfer between graphene/hBN multilayers,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 245437 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Zhang, Nano/Microscale Heat Transfer (Springer, Cham, 2020)

    Zhuomin M. Zhang, Nano/Microscale Heat Transfer (Springer, Cham, 2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Graphene- based photovoltaic cells for near-field thermal energy conver- sion,

    Riccardo Messina and Philippe Ben-Abdallah, “Graphene- based photovoltaic cells for near-field thermal energy conver- sion,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1383 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    Performance analysis of near-field thermophotovoltaic devices considering absorption distribution,

    K. Park, S. Basu, W.P . King, and Z.M. Zhang, “Performance analysis of near-field thermophotovoltaic devices considering absorption distribution,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 109, 305–316 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Ultrahigh- contrast and large-bandwidth thermal rectification in near-field electromagnetic thermal transfer between nanoparticles,

    Linxiao Zhu, Clayton R. Otey, and Shanhui Fan, “Ultrahigh- contrast and large-bandwidth thermal rectification in near-field electromagnetic thermal transfer between nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B 88, 184301 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Near- field enhanced negative luminescent refrigeration,

    Kaifeng Chen, Parthiban Santhanam, and Shanhui Fan, “Near- field enhanced negative luminescent refrigeration,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 024014 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Near-field ther- mal transistor,

    Philippe Ben-Abdallah and Svend-Age Biehs, “Near-field ther- mal transistor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 044301 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Effect of small spacings on radiative transfer between two dielectrics,

    Ernest G Cravalho, C. L. Tien, and R. P . Caren, “Effect of small spacings on radiative transfer between two dielectrics,” J. Heat Transfer. 89, 351–358 (1967)

    1967

  13. [21]

    Relation between near-field and far-field properties of plasmonic Fano reso- nances,

    Benjamin Gallinet and Olivier J. F. Martin, “Relation between near-field and far-field properties of plasmonic Fano reso- nances,” Opt. Express 19, 22167–22175 (2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Advances in radiative heat transfer: Bridging far-field fundamentals and emerging near- field innovations,

    Ambali Alade Odebowale, Andergachew Berhe, Rasheed T Ogundare, Salah Abdo, Amer Abdulghani, Haroldo T Hattori, and Andrey E Miroshnichenko, “Advances in radiative heat transfer: Bridging far-field fundamentals and emerging near- field innovations,” Adv. Funct. Mater. , 2421051 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    En- hanced Far-Field Thermal Radiation through a Polaritonic Waveguide,

    Saeko Tachikawa, Jose Ordonez-Miranda, Laurent Jalabert, Y unhui Wu, Roman Anufriev, Y angyu Guo, Byunggi Kim, Hi- royuki Fujita, Sebastian V olz, and Masahiro Nomura, “En- hanced Far-Field Thermal Radiation through a Polaritonic Waveguide,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 186904 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Coher- ent emission of light by thermal sources,

    Jean-Jacques Greffet, R ´emi Carminati, Karl Joulain, Jean- Philippe Mulet, St ´ephane Mainguy, and Y ong Chen, “Coher- ent emission of light by thermal sources,” Nature 416, 61–64 (2002)

    2002

  17. [25]

    Active thermal extraction and temperature sensing of near-field thermal radiation,

    D Ding, T Kim, and A. J. Minnich, “Active thermal extraction and temperature sensing of near-field thermal radiation,” Sci. Rep. 6, 32744 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Optical antenna thermal emitters,

    Jon A Schuller, Thomas Taubner, and Mark L Brongersma, “Optical antenna thermal emitters,” Nat. Photonics 3, 658–661 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Enhancing far-field ther- mal emission with thermal extraction,

    Zongfu Y u, Nicholas P Sergeant, Torbjørn Skauli, Gang Zhang, Hailiang Wang, and Shanhui Fan, “Enhancing far-field ther- mal emission with thermal extraction,” Nat. Commun. 4, 1730 (2013). 6

    2013

  20. [28]

    Pure and Lin- ear Frequency-Conversion Temporal Metasurface,

    Sajjad Taravati and George V Eleftheriades, “Pure and Lin- ear Frequency-Conversion Temporal Metasurface,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 064011 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Photon acceler- ation and tunable broadband harmonics generation in nonlinear time-dependent metasurfaces,

    Maxim R Shcherbakov, Kevin Werner, Zhiyuan Fan, Noah Tal- isa, Enam Chowdhury, and Gennady Shvets, “Photon acceler- ation and tunable broadband harmonics generation in nonlinear time-dependent metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun. 10, 1345 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Phase-Induced Frequency Conversion and Doppler Effect With Time-Modulated Metasur- faces,

    Davide Ramaccia, Dimitrios L. Sounas, Andrea Al `u, Alessan- dro Toscano, and Filiberto Bilotti, “Phase-Induced Frequency Conversion and Doppler Effect With Time-Modulated Metasur- faces,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68, 1607–1617 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Broadband frequency translation through time refrac- tion in an epsilon-near-zero material,

    Yiyu Zhou, M Zahirul Alam, Mohammad Karimi, Jeremy Up- ham, Orad Reshef, Cong Liu, Alan E Willner, and Robert W Boyd, “Broadband frequency translation through time refrac- tion in an epsilon-near-zero material,” Nat. Commun. 11, 2180 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Adiabatic frequency conver- sion using a time-varying epsilon-near-zero metasurface,

    Kai Pang, M Zahirul Alam, Yiyu Zhou, Cong Liu, Orad Reshef, Karapet Manukyan, Matt V oegtle, Anuj Pennathur, Cindy Tseng, Xinzhou Su, et al., “Adiabatic frequency conver- sion using a time-varying epsilon-near-zero metasurface,” Nano Lett. 21, 5907–5913 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation,

    Dimitrios L Sounas and Andrea Al `u, “Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation,” Nat. Photonics 11, 774–783 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Surface-wave-assisted nonreciprocity in spatio-temporally modulated metasurfaces,

    Andrew E Cardin, Sinhara R Silva, Shai R V ardeny, Willie J Padilla, Avadh Saxena, Antoinette J Taylor, Wilton JM Kort- Kamp, Hou-Tong Chen, Diego AR Dalvit, and Abul K Azad, “Surface-wave-assisted nonreciprocity in spatio-temporally modulated metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun. 11, 1...

    2020

  27. [35]

    Optical nonreciprocity via transmissive time-modulated metasurfaces,

    Hooman Barati Sedeh, Hediyeh Mohammadi Dinani, and Hossein Mosallaei, “Optical nonreciprocity via transmissive time-modulated metasurfaces,” Nanophotonics 11, 4135–4148 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Wood Anomalies and Surface-Wave Excitation with a Time Grating,

    Emanuele Galiffi, Y ao-Ting Wang, Zhen Lim, John B Pendry, Andrea Al `u, and Paloma A Huidobro, “Wood Anomalies and Surface-Wave Excitation with a Time Grating,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 127403 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Surface-wave coupling in double Flo- quet sheets supporting phased temporal Wood anomalies,

    Y a-Wen Tsai, Y ao-Ting Wang, Emanuele Galiffi, Andrea Al`u, and Ta-Jen Y en, “Surface-wave coupling in double Flo- quet sheets supporting phased temporal Wood anomalies,” Nanophotonics 11, 3509–3517 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Modulating near-field thermal transfer through temporal drivings: A quantum many- body theory,

    Gaomin Tang and Jian-Sheng Wang, “Modulating near-field thermal transfer through temporal drivings: A quantum many- body theory,” Phys. Rev. B 109, 085428 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Spatial and tempo- ral modulation of thermal emission,

    Zachary J Coppens and Jason G V alentine, “Spatial and tempo- ral modulation of thermal emission,” Adv. Mater. 29, 1701275 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Photonic re- frigeration from time-modulated thermal emission,

    Siddharth Buddhiraju, Wei Li, and Shanhui Fan, “Photonic re- frigeration from time-modulated thermal emission,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 077402 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Time-modulated near-field ra- diative heat transfer,

    Renwen Y u and Shanhui Fan, “Time-modulated near-field ra- diative heat transfer,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2401514121 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Far-field thermal radiation driven by the tem- perature oscillations of macroscopic bodies,

    Jose Ordonez-Miranda, Y unhui Wu, Masahiro Nomura, and Sebastian V olz, “Far-field thermal radiation driven by the tem- perature oscillations of macroscopic bodies,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 054053 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Incandescent temporal metamaterials,

    J Enrique V ´azquez-Lozano and I ˜nigo Liberal, “Incandescent temporal metamaterials,” Nat. Commun. 14, 4606 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Dispersion effects in thermal emission from temporal metamaterials: high-frequency cutoffs,

    Amaia V ertiz-Conde, I ˜nigo Liberal, and J Enrique V ´azquez- Lozano, “Dispersion effects in thermal emission from temporal metamaterials: high-frequency cutoffs,” Opt. Lett. 50, 1097– 1100 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Can thermal emission from time-varying media be described semiclassically?

    I ˜nigo Liberal, J. E. V ´azquez-Lozano, and Antonio Ganfornina- Andrades, “Can thermal emission from time-varying media be described semiclassically?” Opt. Mater. Express 15, 1483–1495 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Manipulating coherence of near- field thermal radiation in time-modulated systems,

    Renwen Y u and Shanhui Fan, “Manipulating coherence of near- field thermal radiation in time-modulated systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 096902 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Transport in electron-photon systems,

    Jian-Sheng Wang, Jiebin Peng, Zu-Quan Zhang, Y ong-Mei Zhang, and Tao Zhu, “Transport in electron-photon systems,” Front. Phys. 18, 43602 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    David J Griffiths, Introduction to electrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Quantum thermal transport in nanostructures,

    J-S Wang, Jian Wang, and J. T. L ¨u, “Quantum thermal transport in nanostructures,” Eur. Phys. J. B 62, 381–404 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Microscopic theory of photon-induced energy, momen- tum, and angular momentum transport in the nonequilibrium regime,

    Y ong-Mei Zhang, Tao Zhu, Zu-Quan Zhang, and Jian-Sheng Wang, “Microscopic theory of photon-induced energy, momen- tum, and angular momentum transport in the nonequilibrium regime,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 205421 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Nonequilibrium Green’s function method for quantum thermal transport,

    Jian-Sheng Wang, Bijay Kumar Agarwalla, Huanan Li, and Juzar Thingna, “Nonequilibrium Green’s function method for quantum thermal transport,” Front. Phys. 9, 673–697 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    See Supplemental Material for derivations of the free photon and retarded Green’s functions, the energy currents, and the dispersion relations of the surface phonon polaritons, which in- cludes Refs. [58–63]

  45. [53]

    Trace formulas for nonequilibrium Casimir interactions, heat radiation, and heat transfer for arbitrary ob- jects,

    Matthias Kr ¨uger, Giuseppe Bimonte, Thorsten Emig, and Mehran Kardar, “Trace formulas for nonequilibrium Casimir interactions, heat radiation, and heat transfer for arbitrary ob- jects,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 115423 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    Surface electromagnetic waves thermally excited: Radiative heat transfer, coherence properties and Casimir forces revisited in the near field,

    Karl Joulain, Jean-Philippe Mulet, Franc ¸ois Marquier, R ´emi Carminati, and Jean-Jacques Greffet, “Surface electromagnetic waves thermally excited: Radiative heat transfer, coherence properties and Casimir forces revisited in the near field,” Surf. Sci. Rep. 57, 59–112 (2005)

    2005

  47. [55]

    New electromagnetic mode in graphene,

    Sergey A Mikhailov and Klaus Ziegler, “New electromagnetic mode in graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 016803 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Theory of radiative heat transfer between closely spaced bodies,

    DVHM Polder and M V an Hove, “Theory of radiative heat transfer between closely spaced bodies,” Phys. Rev. B 4, 3303 (1971)

    1971

  49. [57]

    Asymmetry-induced radiative heat transfer in Floquet sys- tems,

    Hui Pan, Y uhua Ren, Gaomin Tang, and Jian-Sheng Wang, “Asymmetry-induced radiative heat transfer in Floquet sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. B 112, L041401 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Correlated elec- tron systems periodically driven out of equilibrium: Floquet + DMFT formalism,

    Naoto Tsuji, Takashi Oka, and Hideo Aoki, “Correlated elec- tron systems periodically driven out of equilibrium: Floquet + DMFT formalism,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 235124 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    Ole Keller, Quantum theory of near-field electrodynamics (Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    2011

  52. [60]

    Diagram technique for nonequilibrium pro- cesses,

    L. V . Keldysh, “Diagram technique for nonequilibrium pro- cesses,” Soviet. Phys. JETP 20 (1965)

    1965

  53. [61]

    The S matrix in quantum electrodynamics,

    Freeman J Dyson, “The S matrix in quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. 75, 1736 (1949)

    1949

  54. [62]

    Landauer formula for the current through an interacting electron region,

    Yigal Meir and Ned S Wingreen, “Landauer formula for the current through an interacting electron region,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2512 (1992)

    1992

  55. [63]

    Driven quantum transport on the nanoscale,

    Sigmund Kohler, J ¨org Lehmann, and Peter H ¨anggi, “Driven quantum transport on the nanoscale,” Phys. Rep. 406, 379–443 (2005). Supplemental Material for “Enhancing far-field thermal radiation by Floquet engineering” Huimin Zhu, 1, 2 Y uhua Ren,2 Hui Pan, 2 Gaomin Tang,3 Lei Z...

    2005

  56. [64]

    on the right-hand side denote the block elements of the Floquet matrices. The energy emitted by the bath at +∞ can be obtained by I+∞ = ∫ ∞ 0 dÉ 2Ã ℏÉ ∑ n { T −∞, +∞ n [ N (T+∞, É) − N (T−∞, Én) ] + T +∞, +∞ n [ N (T+∞, É) − N (T+∞, Én) ] + T O, +∞ n [ N (T+∞, É) − N (TO, Én) ...

  57. [65]

    Tsuji, T

    N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 78, 235124 (2008)

    2008

  58. [66]

    J.-S. Wang, J. Peng, Z.-Q. Zhang, Y .-M. Zhang, and T. Zhu, Front. Phys. 18, 43602 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Keller, Quantum theory of near-field electrodynamics (Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    O. Keller, Quantum theory of near-field electrodynamics (Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    2011

  60. [68]

    D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to electrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    Zhang, T

    Y .-M. Zhang, T. Zhu, Z.-Q. Zhang, and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205421 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    L. V . Keldysh, Soviet. Phys. JETP 20 (1965)

    1965

  63. [71]

    F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 75, 1736 (1949)

    1949

  64. [72]

    Meir and N

    Y . Meir and N. S. Wingreen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2512 (1992)

    1992

  65. [73]

    Kohler, J

    S. Kohler, J. Lehmann, and P . H ¨anggi, Phys. Rep. 406, 379 (2005)

    2005

  66. [74]

    H. Pan, Y . Ren, G. Tang, and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 112, L041401 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.