Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 35 references

The twisted Laplacian's Hardy spaces for 0<p<1 admit equivalent atomic, maximal, heat, and reduced-Heisenberg characterisations, yielding optimally smoothed wave-operator maps into L^p.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

For 0<p<1, H^p_L(C^n) admits atomic, maximal-function and heat-semigroup characterizations, and L^{-δ/2}e^{±it√L}: H^p_L→L^p is sharp for δ=(2n-1)(1/p-1/2).

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Serious, likely-correct paper that settles the p<1 Hardy space characterization and sharp wave estimates for the twisted Laplacian; the main gaps are presentation-level, not load-bearing. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.00327 v1 pith:BIUZNEZK submitted 2025-08-30 math.FA math.APmath.CA

On Hardy spaces associated with the twisted Laplacian and sharp estimates for the corresponding wave operator

Riju Basak , K. Jotsaroop This is my paper
classification math.FA math.APmath.CA MSC 42A8542B1542B25
keywords Hardy spacestwisted Laplacianwave operatoratomic decompositionmaximal functions0<p<1oscillatory multiplierssharp estimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that, for every 0

Core claim

The paper claims that H^p_L(C^n), defined initially via the heat maximal function sup_{t>0}|e^{-t^2L}f|, coincides for 0<p<1 with the space defined by the twisted-convolution grand maximal function, with the reduced Heisenberg Hardy space under the lift f(z)e^{it}, and with the atomic Hardy space built from (p,1)-atoms. The atoms are supported on cubes, bounded by r^{-2n/p}, and satisfy ∫f(z)z^α\bar z^βω(z0,z)dz=0 for |α|+|β|≤N0=⌊2n(1/p-1)⌋ when the cube radius is below scale 1. The heart of the atomic direction is a new iterative projection lemma that converts cancellation against a nearby point into genuine centre-based cancellation. Armed with this characterisation, the paper proves that

What carries the argument

The central object is the (p,σ)-atom: a function supported on a cube Q(z0,r), bounded by r^{-2n/p}, whose twisted moments ∫f(z)z^α\bar z^βω(z0,z)dz vanish up to degree N0=⌊2n(1/p-1)⌋ when r<σ. The argument's engine is the iterative projection lemma (Lemma 3.6): it shows that, at a sufficiently small scale σ, a function with cancellation relative to a nearby point ϑ∈Q(z0,2σ) can be decomposed into genuine centre-based atoms, with the remainder shrinking geometrically. For the wave operator, the key machinery is a subordination formula writing the wave kernel as an integral of Schrödinger kernels plus a remainder, and two kernel estimates controlling |\tilde X^α\tilde Y^βK_j(z)| by powers of 2

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that there is a fixed small scale σ, depending only on n and p, such that any function on a cube with cancellation against a nearby point can be iteratively projected into centre-cancelling atoms with the remainder shrinking geometrically; if no such σ exists, the atomic characterisation for p<2n/(2n+1) and the wave-operator proof collapse.

What would settle it

When p<2n/(2n+1), take the atomic decomposition output of Lemma 3.6 for a single function supported in Q(z0,r) with cancellation only at ϑ, and check whether the coefficient sum ∑|η_j|^p stays bounded by a constant independent of the distance |ϑ-z0|. Any unboundedness would refute Theorem A and hence Theorem B.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, every f in H^p_L(C^n) for 0<p<1 has an atomic decomposition with twisted-moment atoms, with quasinorm equivalence between the atomic and maximal-function descriptions.
  • The wave operator L^{-δ/2}e^{±it√L} with δ=(2n-1)(1/p-1/2) maps H^p_L into L^p, so a Cauchy problem with data in H^p_L produces a solution whose spatial profile is p-integrable at fixed time.
  • Interpolating with L^2 and dualising gives L^p boundedness for 1<p<∞ at δ=(2n-1)|1/p-1/2|, improving earlier results that required strict inequality in δ.
  • Sharpness via transplantation shows the smoothing threshold is intrinsic: lowering δ by any amount destroys boundedness on these Hardy spaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same subordination-plus-atomic route should extend to other oscillatory spectral multipliers of L whose kernels satisfy the same two-scale estimates, giving a general template for sharp multiplier theorems on twisted convolution spaces.
  • The lift f(z)e^{it} suggests H^p_L(C^n) is a slice of a reduced Heisenberg Hardy space; a natural test is whether the equivalence holds with explicit constants at p=1 exactly as in the p<1 range.
  • Since the genuinely hard range is p<2n/(2n+1), a constructive example showing Lemma 3.6 fails at some fixed p would immediately expose the optimality of the cancellation degree N0 and the limits of the whole approach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops Hardy space theory for 0<p<1 associated with the twisted Laplacian L on C^n. It proves equivalent characterizations (Theorem A): the grand maximal function via twisted convolution, the heat maximal function, atomic decomposition with (p,1)-atoms, and a reduced Heisenberg group realization. Using the atomic characterization, it proves (Theorem B) that the wave operator L^{-δ/2}e^{±it√L} is bounded from H^p_L(C^n) to L^p(C^n) for 0<p≤1 with δ≥(2n-1)(1/p-1/2), and it derives L^p bounds for 1<p<∞ by interpolation and duality (Corollary 1.3). The central technical novelty is Lemma 3.6, a projection iteration that converts atoms whose cancellation is expressed with respect to a nearby point into atoms with center-based cancellation, allowing the atomic characterization to extend beyond the previously known range p>2n/(2n+1). The proofs rely on external standard tools: local Hardy spaces [Gol79], Heisenberg Hardy space theory [FS82], classical atomic decomposition [Coi74], and spectral multiplier estimates [MS15].

Significance. If the technical gaps are filled, this is a substantial contribution. It provides the first complete atomic and maximal-function characterizations of the twisted Hardy spaces for p<1, and the wave-operator bound in Theorem B is sharp and matches the Euclidean dimension 2n. The paper is direct and free of circular reasoning or fitted parameters; the main results rest on a clear chain: local Hardy reduction (Lemmas 3.3–3.4), the projection lemma (3.6), maximal-function equivalences via the Heisenberg lifting (Theorem 3.10), and spectral multiplier estimates (Lemmas 4.3–4.4). The authors explicitly credit prior work and do not overclaim external support. The positive results would be significant for the harmonic analysis of the twisted Laplacian and for sharp fixed-time estimates of wave propagators.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Lemma 3.6, iteration step (around (3.6)–(3.9))] The proof asserts that after decomposing b^(1) into atoms h_j with cancellation relative to ϑ_j∈Q(w_j,2σ), one has ∥fM_σ(ω(z0,·)Π_{Q_j}h_j)∥_p^p ≤ 1/2^p by 'similar analysis' as for b^(1). This is not demonstrated. The first-step analysis used the specific support Q(z0,r), the phase ω(z0,·) in the h^p_σ norm, and cancellation relative to ϑ∈Q(z0,2σ). For h_j, the support center is w_j, the cancellation point is ϑ_j, and the norm is taken with ω(z0,·) rather than ω(w_j,·). The authors need a uniform estimate, independent of j, w_j, r_j, showing that |Π_{Q_j}h_j(z)| ≤ C σ^{N0+1} r_j^{N0+1-2n/p} and then bounding the h^p_σ norm via Hölder and the L^q boundedness of fM_σ on cubes of side <σ. Without such a uniform bound, the geometric convergence of the iteration is not established, and the atomic characterization for p<2n/(2n+1) is incomplete.
  2. [§4, paragraph after Corollary 1.3] The sharpness of δ in Theorem B is claimed by the sentence: 'The sharpness of δ in Theorem B can be argued using interpolation and the sharpness of the Corollary 1.3.' This is a sketch, not a proof. The title and abstract advertise 'sharp estimates', so the paper should provide the transplantation/interpolation argument in detail or give a precise reference. In particular, for 0<p<1, H^p_L is a quasi-Banach space, and the passage from L^p sharpness to H^p_L sharpness is not immediate; the embedding and duality facts need to be stated.
  3. [§3.2, Remark 3.12] The equivalence H^p_L(C^n) ≅ H^p(H^n_red), used in Theorem A(iii), is stated without proof: 'Using a similar proof as in Theorem 3.10, we can also show...' The convolution on the reduced Heisenberg group requires periodization of the heat kernel, and the details are not given. Since (iii) is one of the advertised characterizations, the proof should be included or the exact statement with the periodized kernel should be supplied.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title and abstract] The title has a typo: 'W A VE' should be 'WAVE'. The abstract says 'sharp boundedness result ... on H^p_L(C^n)' but Theorem B maps H^p_L to L^p; please rephrase for precision.
  2. [Introduction, final paragraph] The sentence 'we will study and prove the sharp fixed time estimates of the wave operators on Hardy spaces ... for the entire range 0 < p <∞' overstates the results: for p>1 the paper proves L^p estimates, not H^p_L estimates.
  3. [Lemma 3.9, estimate for r≥1] In the estimate for I2 in the case r≥1, the exponent λ is not defined; please specify it explicitly from the Gaussian decay so the convergence is verifiable.
  4. [Lemma 4.3/4.5] The integration-by-parts argument for the kernel K_τ is sketched, particularly near |z|=1. The transition between the two regimes |z|>1 and |z|<C(N) should be written more carefully, as the phase derivative can vanish near |z|=1.
  5. [Section 2.1] The Taylor expansion (2.3) is written with unclear notation; the exponents and indices are hard to follow. Please state the identity clearly and include a proof or a precise reference to Lemma 20.3.8 in [BLU07].
  6. [Throughout] Several typos: 'it’s' should be 'its', 'Mikowski' should be 'Minkowski', 'expecitely' should be 'explicitly', and various spacing issues in 'Schr ödinger'. A careful proofreading is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the main theorems are derived from external tools, and the one author-overlap citation is contextual only.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs. Theorem A (equivalence of heat-maximal, grand-maximal, reduced-Heisenberg, and atomic characterizations of H^p_L) is built from external, independent sources: the heat kernel formula for the twisted Laplacian is quoted from [Tha93], the local Hardy-space atomic decomposition from [Gol79], the real-variable maximal-function techniques from [FS72] and [FS82], and the p=1 twisted-convolution Hardy space from [MPR81]. Theorem B (wave-operator boundedness) uses the atomic characterization of Theorem A plus the subordination formula quoted from [MS15, Proposition 4.1] and kernel estimates proved in the paper from the explicit Schrödinger kernel for L. There is no fitted parameter later renamed as a prediction, and no definition that encodes the target theorem. The sharpness discussion for δ is an external argument via [KST82], [Miy80], and [Per80], not a self-citation chain. The only citation overlapping with the present authors is [JT14] (Jotsaroop and Thangavelu), and it appears solely in the introduction as one example among several wave-operator studies; it is not used in any proof and is therefore not load-bearing. The skeptical concern about Lemma 3.6 is a genuine proof gap: the iterative projection step says 'using the similar analysis as we did for b^(1)' and later 'To keep our paper less technical, we will omit the detailed explanations here' for I22. These omissions mean the atomic characterization and hence Theorem B may be incompletely justified for the hardest range p < 2n/(2n+1). But an omitted estimate is a correctness risk, not circularity: the asserted uniform remainder bound, if supplied, would be an additional argument, not an equivalence with the statement being proved. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the required evidentiary standard is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no empirical free parameters and no new physical entities. Its assumptions are standard results in harmonic analysis and spectral theory: explicit heat kernel and Laguerre spectral decomposition for the twisted Laplacian, Folland-Stein's convolution formulas on the Heisenberg group, Goldberg's local Hardy space atomic decomposition, and the Müller-Seeger subordination formula. The main novel device, the projection operator Π_Q in Lemma 3.6, is a proof tool rather than a postulate.

axioms (5)
  • standard math The spectral decomposition of L with explicit Laguerre functions and the heat kernel formula e^{-tL}f = f × p_t
    Invoked in Section 2 and used in Lemma 3.9 and Lemma 4.4; cited from [Tha93], [Tha04].
  • standard math Folland-Stein representation ψ = ∫_0^1 p_s * Θ_s ds for the Heisenberg sub-Laplacian
    Used in proof of Theorem 3.10 to bound the twisted-convolution grand maximal function by the heat maximal function; quoted from [FS82, Theorem 4.9].
  • standard math Subordination formula (4.4) for oscillatory multipliers
    Quoted from [MS15, Proposition 4.1], used to decompose the wave operator into Schrödinger semigroups; the paper relies on this external result without proof.
  • standard math Goldberg's local Hardy space atomic decomposition (Theorem 3.2)
    Used to bootstrap the atomic decomposition of twisted Hardy spaces in Remark 3.5; cited from [Gol79].
  • domain assumption Sharpness of Euclidean wave operator bounds [Miy80], [Per80] and transplantation [KST82]
    The paper claims sharpness of its L^p and H^p estimates deducible from these external results, but does not reproduce the transplantation argument; this is a load-bearing assumption for the sharpness claim, not for the boundedness itself.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Hardy spaces associated with the twisted Laplacian and sharp estimates for the corresponding wave operator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BIUZNEZK

@misc{pith2026250900327,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Hardy spaces associated with the twisted Laplacian and sharp estimates for the corresponding wave operator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BIUZNEZK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00327}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We prove various equivalent characterisations of the Hardy space $H^p_{\mathcal{L}}(\mathbb{C}^n)$ for $0<p<1$ associated with the twisted Laplacian $\mathcal{L}$ which generalises the result of [MPR81] for the case $p=1$. Using the atomic characterisation of $H^p_{\mathcal{L}}(\mathbb{C}^n)$ corresponding to the twisted convolution, we prove sharp boundedness result for the wave operator $\mathcal{L}^{-\delta/2}e^{\pm it\sqrt{\mathcal{L}}}$ for a fixed $t>0$ on $H^p_{\mathcal{L}}(\mathbb{C}^n)$. More precisely we prove that it is a bounded operator from $H^p_{\mathcal{L}}(\mathbb{C}^n)$ to $L^p(\mathbb{C}^n)$ for $ 0<p\leq 1$ and $\delta\geq (2n-1)\left(1/p-1/2\right)$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Anh Bui and Xuan Thinh Duong, Spectral multipliers of self-adjoint operators on B esov and T riebel- L izorkin spaces associated to operators , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2021), no. 23, 18181--18224. 4349231

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Differential Equations 381 (2024), 260--292

    The Anh Bui, Piero D'Ancona, and Xuan Thinh Duong, On sharp estimates for S chr\"odinger groups of fractional powers of nonnegative self-adjoint operators , J. Differential Equations 381 (2024), 260--292. 4672180

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    The Anh Bui, Xuan Thinh Duong, Qing Hong, and Guorong Hu, On S chr\"odinger groups of fractional powers of H ermite operators , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2023), no. 7, 6164--6185. 4565709

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    The Anh Bui, Xuan Thinh Duong, and Fu Ken Ly, Maximal function characterizations for H ardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type with finite measure and applications , J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no. 8, 108423, 55. 4056995

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Betancor, Jacek Dziuba\'nski, and Jose Luis Torrea, On H ardy spaces associated with B essel operators , J

    Jorge J. Betancor, Jacek Dziuba\'nski, and Jose Luis Torrea, On H ardy spaces associated with B essel operators , J. Anal. Math. 107 (2009), 195--219. 2496404

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Bonfiglioli, E

    A. Bonfiglioli, E. Lanconelli, and F. Uguzzoni, Stratified L ie groups and potential theory for their sub- L aplacians , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2007. 2363343

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Jiecheng Chen, Dashan Fan, and Lijing Sun, Hardy space estimates for the wave equation on compact L ie groups , J. Funct. Anal. 259 (2010), no. 12, 3230--3264. 2727645

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Coifman, A real variable characterization of H p , Studia Math

    Ronald R. Coifman, A real variable characterization of H p , Studia Math. 51 (1974), 269--274. 358318

    work page 1974

  9. [9]

    Xuan Thinh Duong and Ji Li, Hardy spaces associated to operators satisfying D avies- G affney estimates and bounded holomorphic functional calculus , J. Funct. Anal. 264 (2013), no. 6, 1409--1437. 3017269

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Fourier Anal

    Piero D'Ancona, Vittoria Pierfelice, and Fulvio Ricci, On the wave equation associated to the H ermite and the twisted L aplacian , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 16 (2010), no. 2, 294--310. 2600961

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    odinger operators with potentials from reverse H \

    Jacek Dziuba\'nski and Jacek Zienkiewicz, H^p spaces associated with S chr\"odinger operators with potentials from reverse H \"older classes , Colloq. Math. 98 (2003), no. 1, 5--38. 2032068

    work page 2003

  12. [12]

    Fefferman and E

    C. Fefferman and E. M. Stein, H p spaces of several variables , Acta Math. 129 (1972), no. 3-4, 137--193. 447953

    work page 1972

  13. [13]

    G. B. Folland and Elias M. Stein, Hardy spaces on homogeneous groups, Mathematical Notes, vol. 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1982. 657581

    1982

  14. [14]

    David Goldberg, A local version of real H ardy spaces , Duke Math. J. 46 (1979), no. 1, 27--42. 523600

    1979

  15. [15]

    Fourier Anal

    Ziyi He, Yongsheng Han, Ji Li, Liguang Liu, Dachun Yang, and Wen Yuan, A complete real-variable theory of H ardy spaces on spaces of homogeneous type , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 25 (2019), no. 5, 2197--2267. 4014799

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Steve Hofmann, Guozhen Lu, Dorina Mitrea, Marius Mitrea, and Lixin Yan, Hardy spaces associated to non-negative self-adjoint operators satisfying D avies- G affney estimates , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 214 (2011), no. 1007, vi+78. 2868142

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Jizheng Huang, Some characterizations of H ardy spaces associated with twisted convolution , Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 79 (2009), no. 3, 405--417. 2505346

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Jizheng Huang and Jietong Wang, H ^p -boundedness of W eyl multipliers , J. Inequal. Appl. (2014), 2014:422, 9. 3359118

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Kaur Jotsaroop and Sundaram Thangavelu, L^p estimates for the wave equation associated to the G rushin operator , Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 13 (2014), no. 3, 775--794. 3331528

    work page 2014

  20. [20]

    C. E. Kenig, R. J. Stanton, and P. A. Tomas, Divergence of eigenfunction expansions, J. Functional Analysis 46 (1982), no. 1, 28--44. 654463

    work page 1982

  21. [21]

    Latter, A characterization of H p ( R n ) in terms of atoms , Studia Math

    Robert H. Latter, A characterization of H p ( R n ) in terms of atoms , Studia Math. 62 (1978), no. 1, 93--101. 482111

    work page 1978

  22. [22]

    Akihiko Miyachi, On some estimates for the wave equation in L p \ and H p , J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 27 (1980), no. 2, 331--354. 586454

    work page 1980

  23. [23]

    Alessio Martini and Detlef M\"uller, A n FIO -based approach to L^p -bounds for the wave equation on 2-step C arnot groups: the case of m\'etivier groups , Arxiv (2024), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.04315

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04315 2024

  24. [24]

    Picardello, and Fulvio Ricci, A H ardy space associated with twisted convolution , Adv

    Giancarlo Mauceri, Massimo A. Picardello, and Fulvio Ricci, A H ardy space associated with twisted convolution , Adv. Math. 39 (1981), no. 3, 270--288. 614164

    work page 1981

  25. [25]

    Stein, L^p -estimates for the wave equation on the H eisenberg group , Rev

    Detlef M\"uller and Elias M. Stein, L^p -estimates for the wave equation on the H eisenberg group , Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 15 (1999), no. 2, 297--334. 1715410

    work page 1999

  26. [26]

    PDE 8 (2015), no

    Detlef M\"uller and Andreas Seeger, Sharp L^p bounds for the wave equation on groups of H eisenberg type , Anal. PDE 8 (2015), no. 5, 1051--1100. 3393673

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    E. K. Narayanan and S. Thangavelu, Oscillating multipliers for some eigenfunction expansions, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 7 (2001), no. 4, 373--394. 1836819

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    Peral, L p \ estimates for the wave equation , J

    Juan C. Peral, L p \ estimates for the wave equation , J. Funct. Anal. 36 (1980), no. 1, 114--145. 568979

    work page 1980

  29. [29]

    Michael Reed and Barry Simon, Methods of modern mathematical physics. II . F ourier analysis, self-adjointness , Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 1975. 493420

    work page 1975

  30. [30]

    Rozenblum and G

    G. Rozenblum and G. Tashchiyan, Riesz L_p summability of spectral expansions related to the S chr\"odinger operator with constant magnetic field , J. Math. Anal. Appl. 284 (2003), no. 1, 315--331. 1996135

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    Sogge, and Elias M

    Andreas Seeger, Christopher D. Sogge, and Elias M. Stein, Regularity properties of F ourier integral operators , Ann. of Math. (2) 134 (1991), no. 2, 231--251. 1127475

    work page 1991

  32. [32]

    Stein, Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality, and oscillatory integrals, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol

    Elias M. Stein, Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality, and oscillatory integrals, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 43, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993, With the assistance of Timothy S. Murphy, Monographs in Harmonic Analysis, III. 1232192

    work page 1993

  33. [33]

    Liang Song and Lixin Yan, A maximal function characterization for H ardy spaces associated to nonnegative self-adjoint operators satisfying G aussian estimates , Adv. Math. 287 (2016), 463--484. 3422683

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    42, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993, With a preface by Robert S

    Sundaram Thangavelu, Lectures on H ermite and L aguerre expansions , Mathematical Notes, vol. 42, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993, With a preface by Robert S. Strichartz. 1215939

    work page 1993

  35. [35]

    217, Birkh\"auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2004, Hardy's theorem on Lie groups, With a foreword by Gerald B.\ Folland

    , An introduction to the uncertainty principle, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 217, Birkh\"auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2004, Hardy's theorem on Lie groups, With a foreword by Gerald B.\ Folland. 2008480

    work page 2004

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.