Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Quantum SWITCH-induced non-Markovianity is not entirely quantum

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the memory effects induced by the quantum SWITCH are not genuinely quantum: once an inert extension of the environment is included, all observed information revivals disappear.

desk verdict A clean, useful negative result for the SWITCH memory question, but only as strong as the non-causal revival criterion it inherits. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04685 v1 pith:BKICE4EM submitted 2026-08-05 quant-ph

Rajeev Gangwar , Ananda G. Maity This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumSWITCHindefinitecausalordernon-Markovianityinformationbackflowmutualnon-causalrevivalinertenvironmentextensionopensystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the memory effects, or non-Markovian information backflow, that the quantum SWITCH is known to generate are genuinely quantum or merely classical. Its answer is that, in the two scenarios analyzed—discrete-time unitary interactions and continuous-time dynamical maps—the revivals are not genuine quantum non-Markovianity. In each case, the apparent revival of the mutual information $I(R;Q)$ between a reference and the system becomes monotonic once the environment is extended by an inert system $F$ and one monitors $I(R;QF)$ instead. The paper concludes that the switch-induced revivals arise from an incomplete description of the environment, not from genuinely quantum memory, and that this should prompt a re-examination of the resources behind indefinite causal order advantages.

What carries the argument

The central object is the inert environmental extension $F$ together with the non-causal information revival criterion of Ref. [33]. The diagnostic works as follows: if a revival of the mutual information $I(R;Q)$ disappears once one monitors $I(R;QF)$ with $F$ isolated from the dynamics, then the revival is classified as non-causal and not genuinely quantum. This test is applied to the quantum SWITCH unitary $U_{\mathrm{QS}} = (U\cdot V)\otimes |0\rangle\langle 0|_C + (V\cdot U)\otimes |1\rangle\langle 1|_C$, with post-selection on the control in $|+\rangle_C$, and to the corresponding post-selected reduced dynamics.

What would settle it

A concrete test would be to compute the process tensor of the post-selected quantum SWITCH dynamics and check whether it admits a convex decomposition into classical mixtures of one-step CPTP maps; witnessing temporal entanglement would overturn the non-genuine classification. Alternatively, finding a switch configuration where the extended mutual information $I(R;QF)$ increases even after optimizing over inert extensions $F$ would directly falsify the paper's conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, although the quantum SWITCH can revive system–reference correlations, it does not generate genuine quantum non-Markovianity. In the discrete model, two unitary processes are superposed with a control qubit and the dynamics is post-selected on the control state $|+\rangle_C$; the revival seen in $I(R;Q)$ is absent in $I(R;QF)$ when $F$ is an inert extension that evolves trivially. The same holds in the continuous model built from two individually CP-divisible amplitude-damping dilations, where the switch-induced revival of $I(R;Q)$ disappears once the environment is purified through an inert $F$. The paper takes this as evidence that the observed non-Markovian signatures are non-causal revivals, fully explained by conditioning on the extended environment rather than by genuine quantum information backflow.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that any information revival which disappears upon adding an inert extension $F$ cannot count as genuine quantum memory; if that criterion is too permissive, the conclusion follows by definition rather than from physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The emergent non-Markovianity previously attributed to the quantum SWITCH would not qualify as a genuine quantum resource under the non-causal revival criterion.
  • Standard non-Markovianity witnesses based on revivals of $I(R;Q)$ can flag classical memory as quantum when applied to switch dynamics, so a positive witness alone is not enough to certify quantum memory.
  • If the conclusion holds, the physical resource behind quantum SWITCH advantages should be sought elsewhere, such as control coherence, control dimension, or the indefinite causal structure itself, rather than in information backflow.
  • The inert-extension test works for mixed initial states as well as pure ones, so the non-genuine classification is not an artifact of starting from a maximally entangled reference–system state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not compute the process tensor of the post-selected switch, so its non-genuine classification remains tied to the chosen state-based extension criterion; a direct temporal-entanglement witness could confirm or overturn the conclusion.
  • If the same pattern generalizes, any memory created by post-selected superpositions of CP-divisible channels may be reproducible by classical hidden-variable models, which would make 'emergent non-Markovianity' a consequence of coarse-graining rather than a resource.
  • A natural testable extension would apply the inert-extension diagnostic to noisy or higher-dimensional switch configurations; configurations where $I(R;QF)$ itself still revives after optimizing over inert extensions would be candidates for genuinely quantum memory.
  • The result suggests a division of labor for future work: information backflow in indefinite causal order should be diagnosed with process-level tools, while operational advantages should be traced to quantities that survive the full environment description.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper examines whether non-Markovian memory effects induced by the quantum SWITCH are genuinely quantum. Using the 'non-causal information revival' criterion of Ref. [33], the authors analyze two scenarios: a discrete-time model with two unitary interactions and a continuous-time model with two amplitude-damping-like channels. They find that, under the post-selected SWITCH dynamics, the mutual information I(R;Q) can revive, but that I(R;QF) becomes monotonic after appending an inert extension F. They conclude that the SWITCH-induced non-Markovianity is not genuinely quantum and that the observed revivals arise from an incomplete description of the environment.

Significance. If the conclusion held generally, it would substantially weaken claims that indefinite causal order generates genuine quantum non-Markovianity as an operational resource. The paper's explicit state constructions, its concrete checkable monotonicity claims for I(R;QF), and its attempt to separate genuine from non-genuine memory are useful and commendable. However, the significance is limited because the analysis covers only two specific examples, the central diagnostic criterion is adopted without independent justification, and the LFS mutual-information criterion is applied to post-selected, normalized states for which the data-processing argument does not automatically hold. The paper is best read as a case study, not as a general no-go result.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III A and III B (Eq. (23) and post-selection after Eq. (32))] The LFS criterion (Eq. (4)) is defined for the reduced dynamics of a system governed by a CPTP map. In both examples, after the SWITCH unitary, the control qubit is projectively measured and the resulting state is normalized, as in Eq. (23) for the discrete case and analogously in the continuous case. These normalized conditional states are not outputs of a CPTP map on the system, and the data-processing inequality that underlies the interpretation of dI(R;Q)/dt>0 as information backflow does not apply to them. Therefore the revivals in Figs. 4 and 6 may be an artifact of post-selection rather than a signature of non-Markovianity in the LFS sense. The authors should either justify the use of the LFS criterion for conditional states or reformulate the claim within a proper multi-time process-tensor framework.
  2. [Sec. II C and Sec. III A (Eqs. (13)-(16))] The paper's central classification rests on the non-causal information revival criterion of Ref. [33], but it does not justify that this criterion is non-vacuous. In the discrete example, the extension F is specifically a purification of the environment, and the text states that 'one can always construct' such an inert extension that removes the revival. For a pure extended global state, I(R;QF)=2S(R), so the monotonicity claim reduces to a statement about the entropy of the reference system; the authors do not explain why this reduction is the correct test of classical versus quantum memory. More importantly, the 'always' phrasing suggests that the criterion may classify every information revival as non-genuine, which would make the paper's conclusion definitional rather than substantive. Please provide a formal statement of the criterion from Ref. [33] and demonstrate, ideally with an example, that it is not satisfied by an arbitrary process.
  3. [Sec. III B (Figs. 6 and 7)] The continuous-time conclusion rests entirely on numerical plots for a single parameter set (p=0.7, gamma_a=0.3, gamma_b=1.8). No analytical expression for I(R;QF)(t) is given, and no proof is provided that this quantity is monotonic for all times or for a range of parameters. Since the abstract and title make a general claim about SWITCH-induced non-Markovianity, a plot-based demonstration for one parameter choice is insufficient. The authors should either provide an analytical derivation of monotonicity or explicitly restrict the continuous-time claim to the plotted parameter values.
  4. [Abstract and Sec. III] The abstract and title assert that 'the memory effects generated by the quantum SWITCH are not genuinely quantum non-Markovian,' but the paper analyzes only two specific scenarios: one discrete-time pair of processes and one continuous-time pair of channels. No general theorem is proved, and the text does not explain why these examples are representative. The conclusion should be narrowed to the scenarios studied, or the paper should supply a general argument covering arbitrary channels in a SWITCH.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. III A (before Eq. (17))] The word 'simultaniously' is misspelled; it should be 'simultaneously'.
  2. [Sec. I (second paragraph)] The sentence 'Till then Indefinite causal order has emerged as a powerful operational resource' is ungrammatical and should be rewritten.
  3. [Sec. III A (Eq. (24))] The chain of inequalities I(R;Q)_t0 >= I(R;Q)_t1 <= I(R;Q)_t2 describes a revival only if the inequalities are strict and the values are consistent with Fig. 4; please clarify the intended strictness.
  4. [Sec. III B (Fig. 7 caption)] The caption says I(R;QF)(t) 'stays essentially constant at all times,' while the text refers to monotonicity; please specify whether the quantity is exactly constant or merely non-increasing.
  5. [Notation (Sec. II B)] The notation I(R;QF) is used without an explicit definition; please state explicitly that it denotes the quantum mutual information between R and the joint system QF.
  6. [References] Reference [35] is an unpublished arXiv preprint; please check whether a published version is available and cite it if so.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Central verdict is inherited from a self-authored, definitional inert-extension criterion; the computed monotonicity of I(R;QF) is real, but its interpretation as 'non-genuine' is the criterion itself.

  1. self definitional [Sec. II C, paragraph defining non-causal information revival (after Eq. (6))]
    "a revival of correlations between a reference and the system is considered non-causal if it disappears upon introducing an inert extension F, where F remains completely isolated from the system throughout the evolution. In such cases, the apparent revival can be fully explained by conditioning on the extended environment rather than by invoking a genuine backflow of quantum information."

    The paper's target classification is defined by the criterion: a revival is 'non-genuine' exactly when it disappears under an inert extension F. The subsequent calculation in Sec. III finds that I(R;QF) is monotonic, and the paper concludes the revival is not genuinely quantum. That conclusion is the definition applied to the computed example, rather than an independent derivation of the nature of the memory.

  2. self citation load bearing [Sec. III A, paragraph after Eqs. (13)-(16)]
    "According to the criterion introduced in Ref. [33], neither of the constituent processes exhibits genuine quantum non-Markovianity."

    Ref. [33] is authored by Buscemi, Gangwar, Goswami, Badhani, Pandit, Mohan, Das, and Bera, and the current first author is a co-author. The paper's central claim that SWITCH-induced revivals are not genuinely quantum is carried entirely by this self-authored criterion; no independent proof, external benchmark, or alternative witness is supplied. The verdict is therefore inherited from the authors' own prior diagnostic rather than established by the present analysis.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [Sec. III A, immediately after Eqs. (13)-(16)]
    "This demonstrates that one can always construct an extended initial state together with a corresponding extended unitary evolution such that the apparent (non-causal) revival of correlations between the reference and the system disappears once the inert extension F is taken into account, provided that no dynamics act on F throughout the evolution."

    The paper itself states that the extension can always be constructed so that the revival disappears. For the discrete scenario, purifying the environment makes the global state pure, forcing I(R;QF) to be constant, so the monotonicity is a mathematical identity of the construction rather than evidence about the physical origin of the memory. The 'non-genuine' verdict then reduces to the criterion's definition plus an always-available purification, making the conclusion true by construction.

full rationale

The numerical computations in the paper are self-contained and likely reproducible: the authors evaluate I(R;Q) and I(R;QF) for explicit unitary models, and report non-monotonic and monotonic curves respectively. That part is not circular. The circularity enters at the interpretive step. The central conclusion—that the revivals are 'not genuinely quantum non-Markovian'—is obtained by applying the non-causal information revival criterion of Ref. [33], a criterion co-authored by the first author, which defines a revival as non-genuine precisely when it disappears under an inert extension F. Once that definition is accepted, the computed monotonicity of I(R;QF) is the verdict, not evidence for it. Moreover, the paper openly notes that such an extension can always be constructed, at least in the pure discrete case, which makes the criterion vacuous for that scenario: any unitary revival can be erased by purification. Thus the central claim is largely forced by the self-authored, definitional diagnostic, even though the underlying correlation plots are independent facts. The paper is not a fabricated prediction or a renamed known result, but its main interpretive claim does reduce, by construction, to the criterion it imports from the authors' prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on model-specific parameters p=0.7, gamma_a=0.3, and gamma_b=1.8 chosen for illustration, on an imported diagnostic criterion from the authors' own prior work, and on the unexamined validity of applying LFS measures to post-selected switch dynamics. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Werner state mixing parameter p = 0.7
    Set for illustration in Sec. III B; no analysis of the central claim across p, so the general conclusion depends on this choice.
  • decay rate gamma_a = 0.3
    Chosen time-scale in Eq. (31) for the continuous example; no scan over rates is provided.
  • decay rate gamma_b = 1.8
    Chosen time-scale in Eq. (31); the claim is not proven for other values.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Non-causal information revival criterion (Ref [33]): monotonic I(R;QF) under an inert extension F implies that the revival is not genuinely quantum.
    Imported in Sec. II C and used in Secs. III A and III B; the criterion is co-authored by the current first author and is not independently validated in this paper.
  • domain assumption Quantum SWITCH with post-selection on the control state |+> can be analyzed with standard LFS non-Markovianity measures.
    Used throughout Secs. III A and III B; post-selection makes the effective map nonlinear, which is not discussed.
  • ad hoc to paper The two model scenarios are representative of quantum SWITCH-induced non-Markovianity.
    No general theorem is supplied; the conclusion is inferred from one discrete two-step model and one amplitude-damping model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum SWITCH-induced non-Markovianity is not entirely quantum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BKICE4EM

@misc{pith2026260804685,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum SWITCH-induced non-Markovianity is not entirely quantum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BKICE4EM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04685}
}
read the original abstract

Indefinite causal order extends quantum information processing beyond fixed causal structures, with the quantum SWITCH serving as its canonical realization. By coherently superposing different orders of quantum channels, the quantum SWITCH has been shown to provide operational advantages in communication, computation, metrology, and related tasks. Despite these advances, the physical resources responsible for these advantages remains unclear. Recent studies have further revealed that the quantum SWITCH can generate memory effects, manifested as non-Markovian information backflow. In this work, we examine the origin of such memory and determine whether they reflect genuine (quantum) non-Markovianity or instead arises from classical origin. To this end, we analyze two representative scenarios: one based on discrete-time evolution and another formulated through dynamical maps in open quantum systems. We show that the memory effects generated by the quantum SWITCH are not genuinely quantum non-Markovian, thereby prompting a re-examination of the source of quantum advantage in indefinite causal order frameworks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04685 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Schematic illustration of the quantum SWITCH. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Mutual information [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Mutual information [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Mutual information [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Mutual information [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Mutual information [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [33]

    Thomas, N

    G. Thomas, N. Siddharth, S. Banerjee, and S. Ghosh, Thermo- dynamics of non-markovian reservoirs and heat engines, Phys. Rev. E97, 062108 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [1]

    As shown in Fig

    We next evaluate the mutual informationI(R;Q) for the normalized post-selected states. As shown in Fig. 4, the dynamics corresponding toρ 1 0 exhibits a revival, I(R;Q) t0 ⩾I(R;Q) t1 ⩽I(R;Q) t2,(24) 6 t0 t1 t2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 I(R; Q) ρ1 RQEC switch without F ρ2 RQEC switch without F FIG. 4: Mutual informationI(R;Q) under the quantum SWITCH, where init...

    work page 2025

  3. [2]

    C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J.27, 379 (1948)

    work page 1948

  4. [3]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  5. [4]

    M. M. Wilde,Quantum Information Theory(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, England, 2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [5]

    Hardy, Probability theories with dynamic causal struc- ture: A new framework for quantum gravity (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0509120 [gr-qc]

    L. Hardy, Probability theories with dynamic causal struc- ture: A new framework for quantum gravity (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0509120 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2005

  7. [6]

    Hardy, Towards quantum gravity: a framework for prob- abilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 3081 (2007)

    L. Hardy, Towards quantum gravity: a framework for prob- abilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 3081 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [7]

    Chiribella, G

    G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and B. Valiron, Quantum computations without definite causal structure, Phys. Rev. A88, 022318 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Chiribella, Perfect discrimination of no-signalling channels via quantum superposition of causal structures, Phys

    G. Chiribella, Perfect discrimination of no-signalling channels via quantum superposition of causal structures, Phys. Rev. A 86, 040301(R) (2012)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Oreshkov, F

    O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, Quantum correlations with no causal order, Nat. Commun.3(2012)

    2012

  3. [10]

    Ebler, S

    D. Ebler, S. Salek, and G. Chiribella, Enhanced communication with the assistance of indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 120502 (2018)

    2018

  4. [11]

    Chiribella, M

    G. Chiribella, M. Banik, S. S. Bhattacharya, T. Guha, M. Al- imuddin, A. Roy, S. Saha, S. Agrawal, and G. Kar, Indefinite causal order enables perfect quantum communication with zero capacity channels, New Journal of Physics23, 033039 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    S. S. Bhattacharya, A. G. Maity, T. Guha, G. Chiribella, and M. Banik, Random-receiver quantum communication, PRX Quantum2, 020350 (2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    Araújo, F

    M. Araújo, F. Costa, and ˇC. Brukner, Computational advantage from quantum-controlled ordering of gates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 250402 (2014)

    2014

  7. [14]

    P. A. Guérin, A. Feix, M. Araújo, and ˇC. Brukner, Exponential communication complexity advantage from quantum superpo- sition of the direction of communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 100502 (2016)

    2016

  8. [15]

    X. Zhao, Y . Yang, and G. Chiribella, Quantum metrology with indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 190503 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    T. Guha, M. Alimuddin, and P. Parashar, Thermodynamic ad- vancement in the causally inseparable occurrence of thermal maps, Phys. Rev. A102, 032215 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    Felce and V

    D. Felce and V . Vedral, Quantum refrigeration with indefinite causal order, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 070603 (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    Mukhopadhyay and A

    C. Mukhopadhyay and A. K. Pati, Superposition of causal order enables quantum advantage in teleportation under very noisy channels, Journal of Physics Communications4, 105003 (2020)

    2020

  12. [19]

    X. Liu, D. Ebler, and O. Dahlsten, Thermodynamics of quan- tum switch information capacity activation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 230604 (2022)

    2022

  13. [20]

    L. M. P. et al., Experimental superposition of orders of quantum gates, Nat. Commun.6(2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    G. R. al, Experimental verification of an indefinite causal order, Science Advances3, e1602589 (2017)

    2017

  15. [22]

    Goswami, C

    K. Goswami, C. Giarmatzi, M. Kewming, F. Costa, C. Bran- ciard, J. Romero, and A. G. White, Indefinite causal order in a quantum switch, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 090503 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    Anand, A

    V . Anand, A. G. Maity, S. Mitra, and S. Bhattacharya, Emergent non-markovianity and dynamical quantification of the quantum switch, Phys. Rev. A111, 032428 (2025)

    2025

  17. [24]

    Mukherjee, B

    S. Mukherjee, B. Mallick, S. Yanamandra, S. Bhattacharya, and A. G. Maity, Interplay between the hilbert-space dimension of a control system and the memory induced by a quantum switch, Phys. Rev. A110, 042624 (2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    A. G. Maity and S. Bhattacharya, Activating information back- flow with the assistance of quantum switch, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quan- tum systems(Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, 2002)

    2002

  20. [27]

    Rivas, S

    A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non- markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection, Reports on Progress in Physics77, 094001 (2014)

    2014

  21. [28]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Collo- quium, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021002 (2016)

    2016

  22. [29]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015001 (2017)

    2017

  23. [30]

    Laine, H.-P

    E.-M. Laine, H.-P. Breuer, and J. Piilo, Nonlocal memory ef- fects allow perfect teleportation with mixed states, Scientific Reports4, 4620 (2014)

    2014

  24. [31]

    Xiang, Z.-B

    G.-Y . Xiang, Z.-B. Hou, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Entanglement distribution in optical fibers assisted by nonlocal memory effects, EPL (Europhysics Letters)107, 54006 (2014)

    2014

  25. [32]

    Bylicka, D

    B. Bylicka, D. Chru ´sci´nski, and S. Maniscalco, Non- markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective, Scientific Reports4, 5720 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Buscemi, R

    F. Buscemi, R. Gangwar, K. Goswami, H. Badhani, T. Pandit, B. Mohan, S. Das, and M. N. Bera, Causal and noncausal re- vivals of information: A new regime of non-markovianity in quantum stochastic processes, PRX Quantum6, 020316 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Gangwar, T

    R. Gangwar, T. Pandit, K. Goswami, S. Das, and M. N. Bera, 9 Squashed quantum non-Markovianity: a measure of genuine quantum non-Markovianity in states, Quantum9, 1646 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Gangwar and U

    R. Gangwar and U. Sen, Genuine and non-genuine quan- tum non-markovianity: A unified information-theoretic review (2026), arXiv:2603.28277 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Rivas, S

    A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and non-markovianity of quantum evolutions, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 050403 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    S. Luo, S. Fu, and H. Song, Quantifying non-Markovianity via correlations, Physical Review A86, 044101 (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    Hayden, R

    P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz, and A. Winter, Structure of states which satisfy strong subadditivity of quantum entropy with equality, Commun. Math. Phys.246, 359 (2004)

    2004

  32. [40]

    Huang and X.-K

    Z. Huang and X.-K. Guo, Quantifying non-markovianity via conditional mutual information, Phys. Rev. A104, 032212 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the degree of non-markovian behavior of quantum processes in open sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 210401 (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    S. Milz, M. S. Kim, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Completely positive divisibility does not mean markovianity, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 040401 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Garbellini, K

    M. Garbellini, K. Mickiewicz, V . Link, A. Eisfeld, and W. T. Strunz, Uniform process tensor approach for the calculation of multi-time correlation functions of non-markovian open sys- tems, The Journal of Chemical Physics164, 10.1063/5.0331783 (2026)

    2026 doi

  36. [44]

    Giarmatzi and F

    C. Giarmatzi and F. Costa, Witnessing quantum memory in non-Markovian processes, Quantum5, 440 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Bäcker, K

    C. Bäcker, K. Beyer, and W. T. Strunz, Local disclosure of quantum memory in non-markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 060402 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Bäcker, V

    C. Bäcker, V . Link, and W. T. Strunz, Verifying quantum mem- ory in the dynamics of spin-boson models, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023106 (2026)

    2026

  39. [47]

    S. Das, A. Yosifov, and J. Sun, Hysteretic squashed entanglement in many-body quantum systems (2026), arXiv:2603.09907 [quant-ph]

    2026

  40. [48]

    P. A. Guérin, G. Rubino, and i. c. v. Brukner, Communication through quantum-controlled noise, Phys. Rev. A99, 062317 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.