REVIEW 2 cited by
On the Effect of Transitivity and Granularity on Vulnerability Propagation in the Maven Ecosystem
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Reusing software libraries is a pillar of modern software engineering. In 2022, the average Java application depends on 40 third-party libraries. Relying on such libraries exposes a project to potential vulnerabilities and may put an application and its users at risk. Unfortunately, research on software ecosystems has shown that the number of projects that are affected by such vulnerabilities is rising. Previous investigations usually reason about dependencies on the dependency level, but we believe that this highly inflates the actual number of affected projects. In this work, we study the effect of transitivity and granularity on vulnerability propagation in the Maven ecosystem. In our research methodology, we gather a large dataset of 3M recent Maven packages. We obtain the full transitive set of dependencies for this dataset, construct whole-program call graphs, and perform reachability analysis. This approach allows us to identify Maven packages that are actually affected by using vulnerable dependencies. Our empirical results show that: (1) about 1/3 of packages in our dataset are identified as vulnerable if and only if all the transitive dependencies are considered. (2) less than 1% of packages have a reachable call path to vulnerable code in their dependencies, which is far lower than that of a naive dependency-based analysis. (3) limiting the depth of the resolved dependency tree might be a useful technique to reduce computation time for expensive fine-grained (vulnerability) analysis. We discuss the implications of our work and provide actionable insights for researchers and practitioners.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Which Is Better For Reducing Outdated and Vulnerable Dependencies: Pinning or Floating?
Across three package ecosystems, floating version constraints are less likely than pinning to leave dependencies outdated, while the claim that floating-minor is least vulnerability-prone is the main genuinely empiric...
-
Tracing Vulnerabilities in Maven: A Study of CVE lifecycles and Dependency Networks
Maven maintainers patch critical vulnerabilities about 48% faster than low-severity ones after public disclosure, and dependent packages take a median of 151 days to adopt available fixes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.