Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Non-convex regularization in remote sensing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.07289 v1 pith:BM3UN4S6 submitted 2016-06-23 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords regularizationclassificationhighlinearregularizerssparseunmixingaccepted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the effect of different regularizers and their implications in high dimensional image classification and sparse linear unmixing. Although kernelization or sparse methods are globally accepted solutions for processing data in high dimensions, we present here a study on the impact of the form of regularization used and its parametrization. We consider regularization via traditional squared (2) and sparsity-promoting (1) norms, as well as more unconventional nonconvex regularizers (p and Log Sum Penalty). We compare their properties and advantages on several classification and linear unmixing tasks and provide advices on the choice of the best regularizer for the problem at hand. Finally, we also provide a fully functional toolbox for the community.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools