Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 85 references

From Sharp to Blur: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 2D Human Pose Estimation Under Extreme Motion Blur Using Event Cameras

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Event cameras teach pose models to see through blur

desk verdict A useful event-camera UDA pipeline for pose under blur, but the headline augmentation's isolated gain is ~0.4 mAP and lacks a random-blur control; the final results are strong enough to warrant review. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22438 v1 pith:BM5QJIML submitted 2025-07-30 cs.CV

Youngho Kim , Hoonhee Cho , Kuk-Jin Yoon This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords unsuperviseddomainadaptation2Dhumanposeestimationeventcamerasmotionblurevent-basedaugmentationpseudo-labelrefinementstudent-teacherframeworkmulti-modalfusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that event cameras can close the domain gap between sharp and motion-blurred images for 2D human pose estimation, without needing any pose annotations in the blurred target domain. Because event streams record per-pixel brightness changes at microsecond resolution, they encode exactly the motion that creates blur; the paper converts that motion into synthetic blur by warping sharp frames along event-derived optical flow and averaging the warps. A multi-modal teacher network trained on this synthetic blur generates pseudo-labels on real blurred frames, and a student–teacher loop with mutual uncertainty masking refines those labels by trusting each network where the other agrees. If the claim holds, pose models trained on ordinary sharp-labeled data plus a synchronized event stream would remain accurate during fast motion and low-light capture, a regime where standard supervision is difficult and expensive to obtain.

What carries the argument

Two mechanisms carry the argument. The first is motion-aware event-based blur augmentation: the event stream is sliced into time segments, a self-supervised event optical-flow network estimates a flow for each slice, and the sharp source image is forward-warped along each flow and combined with a masked average (Eq. 2) to synthesize a blurry image that reflects true pixel motion; a blur translation loss then pushes the synthesized blur closer to real continuous blur. The second is mutual uncertainty masking within a student–teacher loop: confidence scores for a proposed pose are computed from both the teacher's and the student's heatmaps, and any region where the two disagree below a threshold is excluded from the pseudo-label loss, preventing low-quality labels from driving adaptation. The teacher itself is multi-modal, combining an image+event sub-network and an event-only sub-network through a channel-attention refinement module, so dense spatial evidence and motion-invariant edge evidence are balanced when pseudo-labels are generated.

What would settle it

Retrain the Stage-1 teacher with the event-derived flow in the augmentation replaced by random flow of the same magnitude; if target-domain mAP does not drop below the true-event-flow model, the motion information is not doing the work. Additionally, compute an image distribution distance such as FID between the synthesized blurry images and real blurry target frames from EHPT-XC; a large distance would indicate the synthetic blur does not actually approximate real blur.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that motion information from event cameras is sufficient to bridge the sharp-to-blur gap in multi-person 2D pose estimation under fully unsupervised target-domain adaptation. The paper shows that by slicing an event stream into short intervals around a sharp frame's exposure center, estimating optical flow for each slice with a self-supervised network, forward-warping the sharp image along each flow, and masked-averaging the warps (Eq. 2), a model can be trained on synthetic blur that behaves like real blur; a blur translation loss further reduces the residual gap. The resulting teacher, which fuses an image+event sub-network, an event-only sub-network, and a channel-attention refinement module, produces pseudo-labels that a student learns from, with mutual uncertainty masking suppressing disagreeing and thus unreliable predictions. On the EHPT-XC benchmark, the final student reaches 51.6 mAP on the blurred target split, versus 36.4 for the best prior multi-modal domain-adaptation method and 58.8 for an image+event oracle trained with target blur labels, which the paper reads as evidence that event-based augmentation plus mutual masking can substitute for target-domain annotations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that blur synthesized by forward-warping sharp images along event-derived optical flow is a faithful enough stand-in for real motion blur in the target domain, and that synchronized event streams will be available wherever the adapted model is deployed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pose estimation can be adapted to extreme motion blur using only sharp images with labels plus synchronized event streams, removing the need for paired sharp–blur capture rigs or manual blur annotation.
  • The same pretrained teacher can supervise an image-only student, so at deployment an ordinary RGB camera suffices; the paper reports 46.0 mAP for the image-only student versus 36.1 for the image-only sharp-trained baseline.
  • The mutual uncertainty masking makes pseudo-label quality less sensitive to the confidence threshold than single-teacher alternatives, as shown by the threshold analysis, which suggests the method transfers to other unlabeled target domains without per-domain threshold tuning.
  • Because the augmentation is driven by actual motion rather than random kernels, the domain bridge should hold for object motion of varied speed and direction, not just a fixed blur pattern.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same event-flow warping could synthesize other motion-dependent degradations beyond blur, such as rolling-shutter distortion or motion-based aliasing, giving a general recipe for turning events into training signal for any motion-sensitive perception task.
  • If events are available only once during adaptation rather than at deployment, the image-only student result hints at a practical deployment pattern: capture events and sharp frames together, adapt, then ship an image-only model.
  • The mutual-masking logic is modality-agnostic; it should generalize to any sensor pair where one modality is dense but vulnerable to degradation and the other is sparse but robust, such as thermal+RGB or depth+RGB, as a way to generate cleaner pseudo-labels.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an unsupervised domain adaptation method for multi-person 2D pose estimation from sharp images to motion-blurred images, using event cameras as an auxiliary modality. In Stage 1, a multi-modal teacher network (image+event and event-only sub-networks fused by a refinement module) is trained on source-domain sharp data augmented with synthetic motion blur generated by forward-warping sharp frames along event-derived optical flow, optionally made more realistic by a blur translation loss. In Stage 2, the teacher produces pseudo-labels for the unlabeled target blur domain, and a student network is trained with confidence-based masking. Stages 3 and 4 iteratively refine the teacher and student using a mutual uncertainty masking scheme that suppresses inconsistent predictions across the two networks. Experiments on the EHPT-XC dataset show that the full pipeline outperforms existing UDA pose-estimation baselines and approaches, but the isolated contribution of the event-based blur augmentation (Table 3) is small. The paper includes an ablation study, threshold analysis, and an image-only testing variant, and it releases code.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a novel application of event cameras to unsupervised domain adaptation for pose estimation under motion blur, and it demonstrates a practically useful result: the full pipeline improves target-domain mAP from 37.5 to 51.6 over the no-adaptation baseline and outperforms prior UDA methods. The paper's strength is the comprehensive system design and the use of a real benchmark (EHPT-XC) with synchronized image/event data. The authors also provide qualitative comparisons and an image-only student variant, which increases practical relevance. However, the significance is currently tempered by weak direct evidence for the headline mechanism: the motion-aware blur augmentation alone yields only 0.2–0.4 mAP improvement over a no-augmentation teacher baseline, with no random-blur control or seed-variance reporting, and the paper overstates its oracle-comparability. The contribution is potentially important, but the quantitative support for the core novelty needs substantial strengthening.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5, Table 3; Sec. 3.2] The text in 'Effectiveness of the motion-aware augmentations' states that 'motion augmentation improves mAP by 0.4, and when combined with blur translation, it achieves a total improvement of 1.8.' This is inconsistent with Table 3, which reports mAP of 46.5, 46.7, and 46.9 for Baseline, +Motion Aug., and +Motion Aug. + Blur Translation, respectively (i.e., +0.2 and +0.4 mAP); the +1.8 figure corresponds to mAR (50.4→52.2), not mAP. The central novelty's mAP contribution is therefore at most 0.4, which could be within seed noise. More importantly, there is no ablation that trains the Stage-1 teacher with randomly generated blur kernels, so the evidence does not establish that event-derived motion, rather than generic blur augmentation, is what bridges the domain gap. Please add a random-blur control, report results over multiple seeds (or seed variance), and correct the metric misstatement in the text.
  2. [Sec. 5, Table 6; Sec. 4.2] The final method uses masking thresholds th=0.1 and th'=0.1, and Table 6 reports performance under different threshold values. The paper does not state how these thresholds were selected. If they were chosen by sweeping values and picking the ones that maximize target-domain mAP on the test set (or any labeled target data), then the reported final numbers are not obtained in a purely unsupervised manner and the gain from the pseudo-label refinement stages could be inflated. Please specify the threshold selection procedure explicitly; if a held-out labeled validation split was used, describe how it was created; otherwise, fix the thresholds a priori and present the sensitivity analysis without selecting on the test set.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Table 1; Abstract; Sec. 6] The claim that the proposed method 'achieves performance comparable to the multi-modal oracle' is not supported by Table 1. The final student network reaches 51.6 mAP on the Target (Blur) set, while the multi-modal oracle Base (I+E) [16] reaches 58.8 mAP, a gap of 7.2 mAP. This is a substantial difference, not 'comparable' in the usual sense. The same overstatement appears in the abstract and conclusion. Please revise the claim to a more precise statement (e.g., 'outperforms existing UDA baselines and reduces the gap to the oracle') so that the paper's contribution is reported accurately.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (2)] The summation notation in Eq. (2) is difficult to read; the limits and the meaning of δt(x,y) should be typeset more clearly, and the masked-average operation should be described in words as well as equations.
  2. [Fig. 2] The overall framework figure is very dense and hard to parse, especially the arrows and label flow between stages; consider simplifying the diagram and using clearer separation between the four stages.
  3. [Sec. 3.2] The event-based optical flow network is trained with a self-supervised loss, but no architectural details or training specifics are provided beyond references [13,21,54]; a brief description or a table of hyperparameters would help reproducibility.
  4. [Sec. 4.3] The sentence 'Since DualTeacher [1]’s original augmentation is tailored for low-light conditions, we substituted it with standard augmentations' is grammatically incomplete and should be rephrased.
  5. [Table 3 and Sec. 5] The term 'Blur Translation' is used in Table 3 but not defined at first use; clarify that it refers to the blur translation loss of [55] and explain how it is applied to the generated blurry images.
  6. [Table 1] The row 'Ours-Teacher' is not explained in the text; clarify whether it is the teacher network after Stage 1, after Stage 3, or after all refinement stages.
  7. [Fig. 2 caption] There is a typo in the figure caption: 'groud-truth' should be 'ground-truth'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the event-based blur augmentation and mutual-masking self-training pipeline are not defined in terms of the target metric, and no prediction reduces to a fit or self-citation chain.

full rationale

Scanning the derivation chain from Eqs. (1)-(11), I find no step in which an output is defined in terms of its own target or in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Stage 1 trains a teacher on synthetic blur produced by Eq. (2), a masked forward-warping average of source sharp images along event-derived flow; this is a physical forward model trained with source-domain labels, not a function of target annotations or target predictions. Stages 2-4 are a standard self-training loop: the teacher generates pseudo-labels, the student trains on them, and mutual uncertainty masking filters low-confidence predictions. Self-training is not definitionally circular, and the pseudo-labels are not the quantity being predicted (target mAP). The cited event-flow network [13,21,54] and the blur translation loss [55] are external tools, and the EHPT-XC benchmark [16] is an independent captured dataset with oracle baselines; none of these citations smuggles in the paper's conclusion. The only circularity-adjacent issue is hyperparameter selection of the masking thresholds on the target metric in Table 6, which is a soundness and overfitting concern rather than an equation-level reduction and does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on domain assumptions about event availability, synchronization, and the fidelity of event-based blur synthesis. The hyperparameters th and th' are tuned to the target's mAP, which is a circularity-adjacent risk, though not a mathematical derivation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Confidence threshold th (Stage 2) = 0.1
    Selected by mAP sweep in Table 6; no validation split stated.
  • Mutual masking threshold th' (Stage 4) = 0.1
    Selected by mAP sweep in Table 6; no validation split stated.
  • Event time slice count NE = 5
    Set in implementation details (Sec 4.2); affects the range of synthesized blur.
  • Keypoint confidence threshold = 0.03
    Used to filter center detections in Sec 4.2; set by hand.
  • Offset loss weight lambda_g = 0.03
    Inherited from DEKR [24], not tuned for this task.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Event data are available in both source and target domains and are temporally synchronized with the corresponding frames.
    Stated in Sec 3.1; the method requires events for blur synthesis and pseudo-label generation.
  • domain assumption Motion blur can be modeled as the accumulation of warped sharp frames during exposure.
    Assumed in Sec 3.2 and Eq. 2; a standard approximation but not verified against real blur formation.
  • domain assumption The event-based optical flow network provides accurate flow from events alone.
    Sec 3.2: flow is estimated by a self-supervised method [13,21,54]; errors propagate to the synthetic blur.
  • domain assumption Forward warping with masked averaging produces a usable blur proxy.
    Sec 3.2 Eq. 2 handles holes but may create artifacts; the blur translation loss [55] partially compensates.
  • standard math Standard deep learning background (DEKR architecture, NMS, stochastic training) is valid.
    Network follows DEKR [24]; no formal proofs are provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Sharp to Blur: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 2D Human Pose Estimation Under Extreme Motion Blur Using Event Cameras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BM5QJIML

@misc{pith2026250722438,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Sharp to Blur: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for 2D Human Pose Estimation Under Extreme Motion Blur Using Event Cameras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BM5QJIML}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22438}
}
read the original abstract

Human pose estimation is critical for applications such as rehabilitation, sports analytics, and AR/VR systems. However, rapid motion and low-light conditions often introduce motion blur, significantly degrading pose estimation due to the domain gap between sharp and blurred images. Most datasets assume stable conditions, making models trained on sharp images struggle in blurred environments. To address this, we introduce a novel domain adaptation approach that leverages event cameras, which capture high temporal resolution motion data and are inherently robust to motion blur. Using event-based augmentation, we generate motion-aware blurred images, effectively bridging the domain gap between sharp and blurred domains without requiring paired annotations. Additionally, we develop a student-teacher framework that iteratively refines pseudo-labels, leveraging mutual uncertainty masking to eliminate incorrect labels and enable more effective learning. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms conventional domain-adaptive human pose estimation methods, achieving robust pose estimation under motion blur without requiring annotations in the target domain. Our findings highlight the potential of event cameras as a scalable and effective solution for domain adaptation in real-world motion blur environments. Our project codes are available at https://github.com/kmax2001/EvSharp2Blur.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22438 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Image-based networks trained on sharp images face [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall framework of the proposed domain-adaptive human pose estimation. The proposed method consists of four sequential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Motion-aware event-based blur augmentation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of UDA-HE [35], DualTeacher [1], baselines, and our method. The first row represents a scene with minimal blur, while the second and third rows depict scenes with severe blur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison involving performance of each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pseudo label with mutual uncertainty masking. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    A benchmark dataset for event-guided human pose estimation and tracking in extreme conditions

    Hoonhee Cho, Taewoo Kim, Yuhwan Jeong, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. A benchmark dataset for event-guided human pose estimation and tracking in extreme conditions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:134826–134840,

    work page

  2. [1]

    Domain-adaptive 2d human pose estimation via dual teachers in extremely low-light conditions

    Yihao Ai, Yifei Qi, Bo Wang, Yu Cheng, Xinchao Wang, and Robby T Tan. Domain-adaptive 2d human pose estimation via dual teachers in extremely low-light conditions. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 221–239. Springer,

  3. [2]

    Mixmatch: A holistic approach to semi-supervised learning

    David Berthelot, Nicholas Carlini, Ian Goodfellow, Nicolas Papernot, Avital Oliver, and Colin A Raffel. Mixmatch: A holistic approach to semi-supervised learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019. 2

    2019

  4. [3]

    Dhp19: Dynamic vision sen- sor 3d human pose dataset

    Enrico Calabrese, Gemma Taverni, Christopher Awai East- hope, Sophie Skriabine, Federico Corradi, Luca Longinotti, Kynan Eng, and Tobi Delbruck. Dhp19: Dynamic vision sen- sor 3d human pose dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition work- shops, pages 0–0, 2019. 2

    2019

  5. [4]

    Mitigating motion blur in neural radiance fields with events and frames

    Marco Cannici and Davide Scaramuzza. Mitigating motion blur in neural radiance fields with events and frames. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9286–9296, 2024. 1

    2024

  6. [5]

    N-rod: A neuromorphic dataset for synthetic-to-real domain adaptation

    Marco Cannici, Chiara Plizzari, Mirco Planamente, Marco Ciccone, Andrea Bottino, Barbara Caputo, and Matteo Mat- teucci. N-rod: A neuromorphic dataset for synthetic-to-real domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 1342–1347, 2021. 2

    2021

  7. [6]

    Openpose: Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields

    Zhe Cao, Gines Hidalgo, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. Openpose: Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 43(1):172–186,

  8. [7]

    Cascaded pyramid network for multi- person pose estimation

    Yilun Chen, Zhicheng Wang, Yuxiang Peng, Zhiqiang Zhang, Gang Yu, and Jian Sun. Cascaded pyramid network for multi- person pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 7103–7112, 2018. 2

    work page 2018

Show all 85 references
  1. [8]

    Domain adaptive pose estimation via multi- level alignment

    Yugan Chen, Lin Zhao, Yalong Xu, Honglei Zu, Xiaoqi An, and Guangyu Li. Domain adaptive pose estimation via multi- level alignment. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2024. 2, 4

    2024

  2. [9]

    Higherhrnet: Scale-aware representation learning for bottom-up human pose estimation

    Bowen Cheng, Bin Xiao, Jingdong Wang, Honghui Shi, Thomas S Huang, and Lei Zhang. Higherhrnet: Scale-aware representation learning for bottom-up human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5386–5395, 2020. 2

    2020

  3. [10]

    Learning adaptive dense event stereo from the image domain

    Hoonhee Cho, Jegyeong Cho, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Learning adaptive dense event stereo from the image domain. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17797–17807, 2023. 2

    2023

  4. [11]

    Non-coaxial event-guided motion deblurring with spa- tial alignment

    Hoonhee Cho, Yuhwan Jeong, Taewoo Kim, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Non-coaxial event-guided motion deblurring with spa- tial alignment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 12492–12503, 2023. 1

    2023

  5. [12]

    Label-free event-based object recognition via joint learning with image reconstruction from events

    Hoonhee Cho, Hyeonseong Kim, Yujeong Chae, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Label-free event-based object recognition via joint learning with image reconstruction from events. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19866–19877, 2023. 2

    2023

  6. [13]

    Temporal event stereo via joint learning with stereoscopic flow

    Hoonhee Cho, Jae-Young Kang, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Temporal event stereo via joint learning with stereoscopic flow. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 294–314. Springer, 2024. 4

    2024

  7. [14]

    Tta-evf: test-time adaptation for event-based video frame interpolation via reliable pixel and sample estimation

    Hoonhee Cho, Taewoo Kim, Yuhwan Jeong, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Tta-evf: test-time adaptation for event-based video frame interpolation via reliable pixel and sample estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 25701–25711, 2...

    2024

  8. [15]

    Finding meaning in points: Weakly supervised semantic segmentation for event cameras

    Hoonhee Cho, Sung-Hoon Yoon, Hyeokjun Kweon, and Kuk- Jin Yoon. Finding meaning in points: Weakly supervised semantic segmentation for event cameras. In European Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 266–286. Springer, 2024. 2

    2024

  9. [17]

    Poison: Human pose estimation in insufficient lighting condi- tions using sensor fusion

    Viviana Crescitelli, Atsutake Kosuge, and Takashi Oshima. Poison: Human pose estimation in insufficient lighting condi- tions using sensor fusion. IEEE Transactions on Instrumenta- tion and Measurement, 70:1–8, 2020. 2

    2020

  10. [18]

    Eventaid: Benchmarking event-aided image/video enhancement algorithms with real-captured hy- brid dataset

    Peiqi Duan, Boyu Li, Yixin Yang, Hanyue Lou, Minggui Teng, Yi Ma, and Boxin Shi. Eventaid: Benchmarking event-aided image/video enhancement algorithms with real-captured hy- brid dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.08220, 2023. 1, 4

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Rmpe: Regional multi-person pose estimation

    Hao-Shu Fang, Shuqin Xie, Yu-Wing Tai, and Cewu Lu. Rmpe: Regional multi-person pose estimation. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2334–2343, 2017. 2

    2017

  12. [20]

    Weakly and semi supervised human body part parsing via pose-guided knowledge transfer

    Hao-Shu Fang, Guansong Lu, Xiaolin Fang, Jianwen Xie, Yu-Wing Tai, and Cewu Lu. Weakly and semi supervised human body part parsing via pose-guided knowledge transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04310, 2018. 2

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    A unifying contrast maximization framework for event cameras, with applications to motion, depth, and optical flow estima- tion

    Guillermo Gallego, Henri Rebecq, and Davide Scaramuzza. A unifying contrast maximization framework for event cameras, with applications to motion, depth, and optical flow estima- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3867...

    2018

  14. [22]

    Event-based vision: A survey

    Guillermo Gallego, Tobi Delbr¨uck, Garrick Orchard, Chiara Bartolozzi, Brian Taba, Andrea Censi, Stefan Leutenegger, Andrew J Davison, J ¨org Conradt, Kostas Daniilidis, et al. Event-based vision: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(1):...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation

    Yaroslav Ganin and Victor Lempitsky. Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1180–1189. PMLR, 2015. 2

    2015

  16. [24]

    Bottom-up human pose estimation via disentan- gled keypoint regression

    Zigang Geng, Ke Sun, Bin Xiao, Zhaoxiang Zhang, and Jing- dong Wang. Bottom-up human pose estimation via disentan- gled keypoint regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 14676–14686, 2021. 3, 4, 5, 6

    2021

  17. [25]

    Learning non-maximum suppression

    Jan Hosang, Rodrigo Benenson, and Bernt Schiele. Learning non-maximum suppression. In Proceedings of the IEEE con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 4507–4515, 2017. 5

    2017

  18. [26]

    Learning to exploit multiple vision modalities by using grafted networks

    Yuhuang Hu, Tobi Delbruck, and Shih-Chii Liu. Learning to exploit multiple vision modalities by using grafted networks. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 85–101. Springer, 2020. 2

    2020

  19. [27]

    Event-based simultaneous localization and mapping: A com- prehensive survey

    Kunping Huang, Sen Zhang, Jing Zhang, and Dacheng Tao. Event-based simultaneous localization and mapping: A com- prehensive survey. ArXiv, abs/2304.09793, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Semi-supervised 2d hu- man pose estimation driven by position inconsistency pseudo label correction module

    Linzhi Huang, Yulong Li, Hongbo Tian, Yue Yang, Xiangang Li, Weihong Deng, and Jieping Ye. Semi-supervised 2d hu- man pose estimation driven by position inconsistency pseudo label correction module. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recog...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Deepercut: A deeper, stronger, and faster multi-person pose estimation model

    Eldar Insafutdinov, Leonid Pishchulin, Bjoern Andres, Mykhaylo Andriluka, and Bernt Schiele. Deepercut: A deeper, stronger, and faster multi-person pose estimation model. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, P...

    2016

  22. [30]

    Multi-person pose estima- tion with local joint-to-person associations

    Umar Iqbal and Juergen Gall. Multi-person pose estima- tion with local joint-to-person associations. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14, pages 627–642. Springer, 2016. 2

    2016

  23. [31]

    Towards ro- bust event-based networks for nighttime via unpaired day-to- night event translation

    Yuhwan Jeong, Hoonhee Cho, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Towards ro- bust event-based networks for nighttime via unpaired day-to- night event translation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 286–306. Springer, 2024. 1

    2024

  24. [32]

    Unsupervised domain adaptation for training event-based networks using contrastive learning and uncorrelated conditioning

    Dayuan Jian and Mohammad Rostami. Unsupervised domain adaptation for training event-based networks using contrastive learning and uncorrelated conditioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 18721–18731, 2023. 2

    2023

  25. [33]

    Evhandpose: Event-based 3d hand pose estimation with sparse supervision

    Jianping Jiang, Jiahe Li, Baowen Zhang, Xiaoming Deng, and Boxin Shi. Evhandpose: Event-based 3d hand pose estimation with sparse supervision. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024. 2

    2024

  26. [34]

    Complementing event streams and rgb frames for hand mesh reconstruction

    Jianping Jiang, Xinyu Zhou, Bingxuan Wang, Xiaoming Deng, Chao Xu, and Boxin Shi. Complementing event streams and rgb frames for hand mesh reconstruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 24944–24954, 2024. 2

    2024

  27. [35]

    A unified framework for domain adaptive pose estimation

    Donghyun Kim, Kaihong Wang, Kate Saenko, Margrit Betke, and Stan Sclaroff. A unified framework for domain adaptive pose estimation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 603–620. Springer, 2022. 2, 4, 6, 7

    2022

  28. [36]

    Ev-tta: Test-time adaptation for event-based object recognition

    Junho Kim, Inwoo Hwang, and Young Min Kim. Ev-tta: Test-time adaptation for event-based object recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 17745–17754, 2022. 2

    2022

  29. [37]

    Cross-modal temporal alignment for event-guided video deblurring

    Taewoo Kim, Hoonhee Cho, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Cross-modal temporal alignment for event-guided video deblurring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.14930, 2024. 4

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Frequency- aware event-based video deblurring for real-world motion blur

    Taewoo Kim, Hoonhee Cho, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Frequency- aware event-based video deblurring for real-world motion blur. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 24966–24976,

  31. [39]

    Towards real-world event-guided low-light video enhancement and deblurring

    Taewoo Kim, Jaeseok Jeong, Hoonhee Cho, Yuhwan Jeong, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Towards real-world event-guided low-light video enhancement and deblurring. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 433–451. Springer, 2024. 1

    2024

  32. [40]

    Pifpaf: Composite fields for human pose estimation

    Sven Kreiss, Lorenzo Bertoni, and Alexandre Alahi. Pifpaf: Composite fields for human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11977–11986, 2019. 2

    2019

  33. [41]

    Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks

    Dong-Hyun Lee et al. Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks. In Workshop on challenges in representation learning, ICML, page 896. Atlanta, 2013. 2

    2013

  34. [42]

    Event-assisted low-light video object segmentation

    Hebei Li, Jin Wang, Jiahui Yuan, Yue Li, Wenming Weng, Yansong Peng, Yueyi Zhang, Zhiwei Xiong, and Xiaoyan Sun. Event-assisted low-light video object segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3250–3259, 2024. 1

    2024

  35. [43]

    Towards robust event-guided low-light image en- hancement: a large-scale real-world event-image dataset and novel approach

    Guoqiang Liang, Kanghao Chen, Hangyu Li, Yunfan Lu, and Lin Wang. Towards robust event-guided low-light image en- hancement: a large-scale real-world event-image dataset and novel approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p...

    2024

  36. [44]

    Coherent event guided low-light video en- hancement

    Jinxiu Liang, Yixin Yang, Boyu Li, Peiqi Duan, Yong Xu, and Boxin Shi. Coherent event guided low-light video en- hancement. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10615–10625, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Seeing motion at nighttime with an event camera

    Haoyue Liu, Shihan Peng, Lin Zhu, Yi Chang, Hanyu Zhou, and Luxin Yan. Seeing motion at nighttime with an event camera. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 25648–25658,

  38. [46]

    Investigating depth domain adaptation for efficient human pose estimation

    Angel Mart ´ınez-Gonz´alez, Michael Villamizar, Olivier Can´evet, and Jean-Marc Odobez. Investigating depth domain adaptation for efficient human pose estimation. In Proceed- ings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops, pages 0–0, 2018. 2

    2018

  39. [47]

    Bridging the gap between events and frames through unsupervised domain adaptation

    Nico Messikommer, Daniel Gehrig, Mathias Gehrig, and Da- vide Scaramuzza. Bridging the gap between events and frames through unsupervised domain adaptation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2):3515–3522, 2022. 2

    2022

  40. [48]

    Even- tego3d: 3d human motion capture from egocentric event streams

    Christen Millerdurai, Hiroyasu Akada, Jian Wang, Diogo Luvizon, Christian Theobalt, and Vladislav Golyanik. Even- tego3d: 3d human motion capture from egocentric event streams. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1186–1195,

  41. [49]

    Eventego3d++: 3d human motion capture from a head-mounted event camera

    Christen Millerdurai, Hiroyasu Akada, Jian Wang, Diogo Luvizon, Alain Pagani, Didier Stricker, Christian Theobalt, and Vladislav Golyanik. Eventego3d++: 3d human motion capture from a head-mounted event camera. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07869, 2025. 2

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Dif- ferentiable event stream simulator for non-rigid 3d tracking

    Jalees Nehvi, Vladislav Golyanik, Franziska Mueller, Hans- Peter Seidel, Mohamed Elgharib, and Christian Theobalt. Dif- ferentiable event stream simulator for non-rigid 3d tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 130...

    2021

  43. [51]

    Stacked hour- glass networks for human pose estimation

    Alejandro Newell, Kaiyu Yang, and Jia Deng. Stacked hour- glass networks for human pose estimation. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part VIII 14, pages 483–499. Springer, 2016. 2

    2016

  44. [52]

    Associative embedding: End-to-end learning for joint detection and group- ing

    Alejandro Newell, Zhiao Huang, and Jia Deng. Associative embedding: End-to-end learning for joint detection and group- ing. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30,

  45. [53]

    Towards accurate multi-person pose estimation in the wild

    George Papandreou, Tyler Zhu, Nori Kanazawa, Alexander Toshev, Jonathan Tompson, Chris Bregler, and Kevin Murphy. Towards accurate multi-person pose estimation in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4903–4911, 2017. 2

    2017

  46. [54]

    Back to event basics: Self-supervised learning of image reconstruction for event cameras via photometric constancy

    Federico Paredes-Vall´es and Guido CHE de Croon. Back to event basics: Self-supervised learning of image reconstruction for event cameras via photometric constancy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.08283, 2020. 4

    2009 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Blur2blur: Blur conversion for unsupervised image deblurring on unknown domains

    Bang-Dang Pham, Phong Tran, Anh Tran, Cuong Pham, Rang Nguyen, and Minh Hoai. Blur2blur: Blur conversion for unsupervised image deblurring on unknown domains. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2804–2813, 2024. 4

    2024

  48. [56]

    Deepcut: Joint subset partition and labeling for multi person pose estimation

    Leonid Pishchulin, Eldar Insafutdinov, Siyu Tang, Bjoern Andres, Mykhaylo Andriluka, Peter V Gehler, and Bernt Schiele. Deepcut: Joint subset partition and labeling for multi person pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogniti...

    2016

  49. [57]

    Da4event: towards bridging the sim-to- real gap for event cameras using domain adaptation

    Mirco Planamente, Chiara Plizzari, Marco Cannici, Marco Ci- ccone, Francesco Strada, Andrea Bottino, Matteo Matteucci, and Barbara Caputo. Da4event: towards bridging the sim-to- real gap for event cameras using domain adaptation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(4):6616...

    2021

  50. [58]

    Self-supervised au- toregressive domain adaptation for time series data

    Mohamed Ragab, Emadeldeen Eldele, Zhenghua Chen, Min Wu, Chee-Keong Kwoh, and Xiaoli Li. Self-supervised au- toregressive domain adaptation for time series data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35 (1):1341–1351, 2022. 2

    2022

  51. [59]

    Real-world blur dataset for learning and benchmarking de- blurring algorithms

    Jaesung Rim, Haeyun Lee, Jucheol Won, and Sunghyun Cho. Real-world blur dataset for learning and benchmarking de- blurring algorithms. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXV 16, pages 184–201. Springer, 2020. 4

    2020

  52. [60]

    Eventhands: Real-time neural 3d hand pose estima- tion from an event stream

    Viktor Rudnev, Vladislav Golyanik, Jiayi Wang, Hans-Peter Seidel, Franziska Mueller, Mohamed Elgharib, and Christian Theobalt. Eventhands: Real-time neural 3d hand pose estima- tion from an event stream. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer visio...

    2021

  53. [61]

    Deep high- resolution representation learning for human pose estimation

    Ke Sun, Bin Xiao, Dong Liu, and Jingdong Wang. Deep high- resolution representation learning for human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5693–5703, 2019. 2

    2019

  54. [62]

    Bottom-up human pose estimation by ranking heatmap-guided adaptive keypoint estimates

    Ke Sun, Zigang Geng, Depu Meng, Bin Xiao, Dong Liu, Zhaoxiang Zhang, and Jingdong Wang. Bottom-up human pose estimation by ranking heatmap-guided adaptive keypoint estimates. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.15480, 2020. 2

    2006 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Event-based fusion for motion deblurring with cross-modal attention

    Lei Sun, Christos Sakaridis, Jingyun Liang, Qi Jiang, Kailun Yang, Peng Sun, Yaozu Ye, Kaiwei Wang, and Luc Van Gool. Event-based fusion for motion deblurring with cross-modal attention. In European conference on computer vision, pages 412–428. Springer, 2022. 1, 4

    2022

  56. [64]

    Ess: Learning event-based semantic seg- mentation from still images

    Zhaoning Sun, Nico Messikommer, Daniel Gehrig, and Da- vide Scaramuzza. Ess: Learning event-based semantic seg- mentation from still images. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 341–357. Springer, 2022. 2

    2022

  57. [65]

    Motion aware event representation-driven image deblurring

    Zhijing Sun, Xueyang Fu, Longzhuo Huang, Aiping Liu, and Zheng-Jun Zha. Motion aware event representation-driven image deblurring. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 418–435. Springer, 2024. 1

    2024

  58. [66]

    Directpose: Di- rect end-to-end multi-person pose estimation

    Zhi Tian, Hao Chen, and Chunhua Shen. Directpose: Di- rect end-to-end multi-person pose estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.07451, 2019. 2

    1911 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Evdistill: Asynchronous events to end-task learning via bidirectional reconstruction-guided cross-modal knowledge distillation

    Lin Wang, Yujeong Chae, Sung-Hoon Yoon, Tae-Kyun Kim, and Kuk-Jin Yoon. Evdistill: Asynchronous events to end-task learning via bidirectional reconstruction-guided cross-modal knowledge distillation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Reco...

    2021

  60. [68]

    Revisit event gener- ation model: Self-supervised learning of event-to-video recon- struction with implicit neural representations

    Zipeng Wang, Yunfan Lu, and Lin Wang. Revisit event gener- ation model: Self-supervised learning of event-to-video recon- struction with implicit neural representations. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 321–339. Springer,

  61. [69]

    Convolutional pose machines

    Shih-En Wei, Varun Ramakrishna, Takeo Kanade, and Yaser Sheikh. Convolutional pose machines. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pages 4724–4732, 2016. 2

    2016

  62. [70]

    Event- based video reconstruction using transformer

    Wenming Weng, Yueyi Zhang, and Zhiwei Xiong. Event- based video reconstruction using transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 2563–2572, 2021. 1

    2021

  63. [71]

    Cbam: Convolutional block attention module

    Sanghyun Woo, Jongchan Park, Joon-Young Lee, and In So Kweon. Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 3–19, 2018. 8

    2018

  64. [72]

    Leod: Label-efficient object detection for event cameras

    Ziyi Wu, Mathias Gehrig, Qing Lyu, Xudong Liu, and Igor Gilitschenski. Leod: Label-efficient object detection for event cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 16933–16943, 2024. 2

    2024

  65. [73]

    Cmda: Cross-modality domain adapta- tion for nighttime semantic segmentation

    Ruihao Xia, Chaoqiang Zhao, Meng Zheng, Ziyan Wu, Qiyu Sun, and Yang Tang. Cmda: Cross-modality domain adapta- tion for nighttime semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 21572–21581, 2023. 1, 3

    2023

  66. [74]

    An empirical study of the collapsing problem in semi- supervised 2d human pose estimation

    Rongchang Xie, Chunyu Wang, Wenjun Zeng, and Yizhou Wang. An empirical study of the collapsing problem in semi- supervised 2d human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 11240–11249, 2021. 2

    2021

  67. [75]

    Eventcap: Monocular 3d capture of high-speed human motions using an event camera

    Lan Xu, Weipeng Xu, Vladislav Golyanik, Marc Habermann, Lu Fang, and Christian Theobalt. Eventcap: Monocular 3d capture of high-speed human motions using an event camera. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4968–4978, 2020. 2

    2020

  68. [76]

    Reli11d: A comprehensive multimodal human motion dataset and method

    Ming Yan, Yan Zhang, Shuqiang Cai, Shuqi Fan, Xincheng Lin, Yudi Dai, Siqi Shen, Chenglu Wen, Lan Xu, Yuexin Ma, et al. Reli11d: A comprehensive multimodal human motion dataset and method. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , p...

    2024

  69. [77]

    A dynamic vision sensor with 1% temporal contrast sensitivity and in- pixel asynchronous delta modulator for event encoding

    Minhao Yang, Shih-Chii Liu, and Tobi Delbruck. A dynamic vision sensor with 1% temporal contrast sensitivity and in- pixel asynchronous delta modulator for event encoding. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 50(9):2149–2160, 2015. 1

    2015

  70. [78]

    Motion deblurring via spatial-temporal collaboration of frames and events

    Wen Yang, Jinjian Wu, Jupo Ma, Leida Li, and Guangming Shi. Motion deblurring via spatial-temporal collaboration of frames and events. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 6531–6539, 2024. 1

    2024

  71. [79]

    Learning event guided high dynamic range video re- construction

    Yixin Yang, Jin Han, Jinxiu Liang, Imari Sato, and Boxin Shi. Learning event guided high dynamic range video re- construction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 13924– 13934, 2023. 1

    2023

  72. [80]

    Event-guided low- light video semantic segmentation

    Zhen Yao and Mooi Choo Chuah. Event-guided low- light video semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00639, 2024. 1

    2024

  73. [81]

    Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration

    Syed Waqas Zamir, Aditya Arora, Salman Khan, Mu- nawar Hayat, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5728–5739,

  74. [82]

    Human from blur: Human pose tracking from blurry images

    Yiming Zhao, Denys Rozumnyi, Jie Song, Otmar Hilliges, Marc Pollefeys, and Martin R Oswald. Human from blur: Human pose tracking from blurry images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 14905–14915, 2023. 2

    2023

  75. [83]

    Eventdance: Unsupervised source- free cross-modal adaptation for event-based object recogni- tion

    Xu Zheng and Lin Wang. Eventdance: Unsupervised source- free cross-modal adaptation for event-based object recogni- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17448–17458,

  76. [84]

    Semi-supervised video semantic segmentation with inter-frame feature recon- struction

    Jiafan Zhuang, Zilei Wang, and Yuan Gao. Semi-supervised video semantic segmentation with inter-frame feature recon- struction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3263–3271,

  77. [85]

    Eventhpe: Event-based 3d human pose and shape estimation

    Shihao Zou, Chuan Guo, Xinxin Zuo, Sen Wang, Pengyu Wang, Xiaoqin Hu, Shoushun Chen, Minglun Gong, and Li Cheng. Eventhpe: Event-based 3d human pose and shape estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10996–11005, 2021. 2

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.