REVIEW 2 cited by
A Characterization of Universally Optimal Queueing Regimes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider an M/M/s queueing model in which customers strategically decide, based on the service reward and waiting cost, whether to join upon arrival or balk and, at any time, whether to remain in the queue or renege. Rational strategic behavior yields an equilibrium whose outcome may be socially efficient or inefficient, depending on the queueing regime. Some regimes yield an efficient equilibrium only under precise calibration to the model parameters. Others are universally optimal, meaning that their equilibrium outcome is efficient for all parameter values. Universal optimality is therefore an appealing property for a planner choosing a queueing regime. We characterize the class of universally optimal queueing regimes. A by-product of our characterization is that preemption plays an unavoidable role in universally optimal regimes.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
How to Beat FCFS
A strategically reordered "Ledger" queue attracts strictly more arrivals than a first-come-first-served competitor, with any work-conserving rule capped at about a 70.7% share.
-
Strategic Queues with Priority Classes
In an M/M/1 queue where type-A customers have priority over type-B customers, the paper derives threshold strategies for joining and quitting at equilibrium and compares them with social optima.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.