REVIEW 1 cited by
On the Hole Argument and the physical interpretation of General Relativity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Einstein presented the Hole Argument against General Covariance, understood as invariance with respect to a change of coordinates, as a consequence of his initial failure to obtain covariant equations that, in the weak static limit, contain Newton's law. Fortunately, about two years later, Einstein returned to General Covariance and found these famous equations of gravity. However, the rejection of his Hole Argument carries a totally different vision of space-time. Its substantivalism notion, which is an essential ingredient in Newtonian theory and also in his special theory of relativity, has to be replaced, following Descartes and Leibniz's relationalism, by a set of "point-coincidences."
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the perturbed Friedmann equations in Newtonian Gauge
The authors derive the Friedmann equations and their first-order perturbations from Newtonian mechanics and thermodynamics, and show the perturbed equations coincide with general relativity at linear order.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.