Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 134 references

Energy-dependent Optical/Near-infrared and X-ray Correlations in Swift J1727.8-1613

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Optical and hard X-ray emission move in opposite directions in the black hole transient Swift J1727.8–1613, while the QPO delay stays flat at ~60–80 ms across 2–150 keV.

desk verdict Solid timing work with a new hard-X-ray energy dimension, but the headline optical anti-correlation with hard X-rays is not yet established—it could be an artifact of the soft-hard lag in the time-domain DCF. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28852 v1 pith:BNZCJWJN submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.HE hep-ph

Ruican Ma , Federico Vincentelli , Diego Altamirano , Alexandra Veledina , Poshak Gandhi , Piergiorgio Casella , Tariq Shahbaz , Sian Woahene-Demehin This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords blackholeX-raybinariesquasi-periodicoscillationsoptical/X-raycross-correlationComptonisationaccretionflowjetstiminganalysisSwiftJ1727.8-1613
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper analyzes simultaneous optical, near-infrared, and broadband X-ray timing of the black hole transient Swift J1727.8–1613 in its hard-intermediate state. It reports that all three optical/IR bands track the soft X-rays, but the optical bands switch to a strong anti-correlation against the hardest X-rays (27–150 keV) — a sign flip reported here for the first time. At the quasi-periodic oscillation frequency, the optical delay is nearly constant at ~60–80 ms across the entire 2–150 keV band. The authors argue this complex coupling requires multiple Comptonisation regions, with the optical anti-correlation tied to a hot-flow component and the flat QPO delay pointing to a geometric origin rather than energy-dependent Comptonisation.

What carries the argument

The analysis hinges on discrete correlation functions and Fourier cross-spectra (coherence, phase lag, time lag) computed between optical/IR and X-ray light curves split into narrow energy bands, plus a lag–energy spectrum across 2–150 keV. The key observational identity is the near-constant QPO phase lag of ~0.18π rad across the full X-ray band, which is used to argue that the QPO delay is set by geometry, while the energy-dependent broadband lags trace distinct Comptonisation components.

What would settle it

Simulate light curves consisting of a coherent QPO with a known phase lag plus broadband noise, run them through the same DCF pipeline, and check whether a spurious hard-X-ray anti-correlation dip appears at the optical lag. Alternatively, filter the X-ray light curve to remove the QPO band and re-compute the DCF: a real anti-correlation should persist.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the optical/near-infrared emission of Swift J1727.8–1613 is coupled to at least two distinct X-ray components. Cross-correlation shows the infrared K_s, optical i_s, and optical g_s bands all positively correlated with 2–10 keV X-rays, while i_s and g_s anti-correlate with 27–150 keV X-rays — the first reported hard-X-ray anti-correlation of its kind. Frequency-resolved lags strengthen the point: the broadband noise shows an optical lead that grows with X-ray energy, whereas the QPO lag is flat at ~0.18π rad (~60–80 ms) from 2 to 150 keV. The authors interpret the energy dependence as evidence for multiple Comptonisation regions and the flat QPO lag as a geometric,

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation rests on the assumption that the hard-X-ray anti-correlation seen in the discrete correlation function is a genuine broadband component and not an artifact created by the mixing of the quasi-periodic oscillation's phase lag with the underlying variability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Optical emission must be driven by at least two separate X-ray components, not a single reprocessing or jet channel.
  • The hard-X-ray anti-correlation, if real, provides a new diagnostic for the hot-flow synchrotron self-Compton component and may be common in other black hole transients observed with hard X-ray coverage.
  • A flat QPO lag up to 150 keV rules out energy-dependent Comptonisation delays as the dominant QPO timing mechanism in this source, favoring precession of a hot flow or jet.
  • The wavelength dependence (infrared positive correlation versus optical anti-correlation at hard X-rays) maps a transition from jet-dominated to hot-flow-dominated OIR emission.
  • The steep high-energy decline of the QPO-modulated absolute rms disfavors a simple unbroken jet synchrotron spectrum, constraining the emitting particle distribution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the QPO lag is geometric, extending the same lag–energy measurement to different QPO frequencies (and thus different radii) could map the size and precession profile of the inner flow, a testable prediction of Lense-Thirring precession models.
  • The paper's decomposition of the DCF into broadband anti-correlation plus additive QPO modulation could be tested with simulated light curves; if the anti-correlation survives QPO filtering, the multiple-Comptonisation reading is secure.
  • A natural extension is to look for the same optical–hard-X-ray anti-correlation in other black hole transients with simultaneous OIR and hard X-ray coverage; its presence would link the phenomenon to state and spectral hardness rather than to source-specific geometry.
  • The flat QPO lag across energy implies that the optical and hard-X-ray QPO modulations are produced in the same geometric frame; polarimetric QPO-phase measurements could directly check for a precessing emitter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multiwavelength timing analysis of the black hole transient Swift J1727.8–1613 using simultaneous Insight-HXMT (2–150 keV), ULTRACAM (g_s, i_s) and HAWK-I (K_s) observations on 2023 September 9. Power spectra show a ~1.4 Hz QPO in the X-ray bands and marginal QPOs in i_s and K_s. The discrete correlation functions (DCFs) show positive OIR–LE correlations for all three bands, while g_s and i_s show an anti-correlation with the HE band. Cross-spectral analysis yields an i_s QPO lag of ~60–80 ms relative to the X-rays that is approximately constant from 2 to 150 keV, while the LFBN and HFBN lags show strong energy dependence. The authors interpret the energy-dependent coupling as evidence for multiple Comptonisation regions, with the QPO originating from a geometric process.

Significance. If the hard-X-ray anti-correlation is established, this is a new observational result for this source and would provide a strong constraint on the coupling of optical synchrotron emission to a hard Comptonising component. The near-flat QPO phase lag across 2–150 keV is also striking and, if robust, supports a geometric origin rather than energy-dependent Comptonisation delays. The paper uses standard, carefully applied timing tools; the QPO lag values are internally consistent (71±7 ms vs LE, 67±6 ms vs HE). Its main limitation is that the central DCF claim is presented without significance estimates or tests against the trivial model in which the optical band is correlated only with the soft X-rays.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 3] The central 'strong anti-correlation' of i_s and g_s with HE is reported without confidence intervals, bootstrap, or Monte Carlo significance. The only quoted uncertainty is half a DCF bin for the peak lag. This is insufficient to support a 'first time' claim. Please provide DCF uncertainties (e.g., bootstrap on segments, or simulations preserving each band's PDS and the observed LE–HE coherence) and state the significance of the anti-correlation dips, including a quantitative comparison with the LE DCF.
  2. [§4.1, Fig. 7] The paper does not rule out the null hypothesis that the optical–HE anti-correlation arises purely from the hard–soft lag. Since HE lags LE by a phase that can approach π at low frequencies, any optical component that is positively correlated with LE will appear anti-correlated with HE in a time-domain DCF that mixes all Fourier frequencies. The spectral 'harder-when-brighter' behaviour in Fig. 6 is not a timing decomposition. Please simulate the null model (e.g., optical light curve = a*LE(t) + noise, possibly with the observed QPO and lag) and compare the resulting optical–HE DCF with Fig. 3. This is load-bearing for the multiple-Comptonisation interpretation.
  3. [§4.1, right panel of Fig. 4] The interpretation that the DCF consists of a broadband anti-correlated component plus an additive coherent QPO component is not tested quantitatively. The text itself concedes (Section 3.3) that the HE-referenced lag spectra 'may also be interpreted' as a QPO lag on a broadband lag. The authors should fit this two-component model to the cross-spectrum or phase-lag versus frequency, or perform an injection-recovery simulation, and show that the observed DCF is reproduced. Without this, the flat QPO lag and the separate anti-correlated component are not independently established.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'delayed optical anti-correlation' is unclear; specify that the anti-correlation appears at small positive lags and quantify it in the text.
  2. [§3.2] The DCF peak lags are quoted without uncertainties; state the bin size and whether the only uncertainty is half a bin, and give errors in the text rather than only in the figures.
  3. [§3.4] The energy sub-bands overlap between instruments (e.g., 7–11 keV in both LE and ME). Clarify whether these are independent measurements or a consistency check, and how errors were propagated.
  4. [Fig. 8] The power-law fit to the QPO absolute-rms spectrum is quoted with a slope (-1.61±0.14) but the fit range and method are not given; please provide details.
  5. [§4.1] The statement that an approximately constant phase lag close to -0.5π rad would produce the anti-correlation is not obviously consistent with the LFBN phase lag varying from about -0.1π rad to -0.6π rad with energy in §3.4; please clarify what is meant.
  6. [Throughout] The paper uses 'DCF' and 'CCF' interchangeably; define the acronyms at first use and use a consistent term.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the central lag and anti-correlation claims are direct measurements, with only non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's headline results — the optical anti-correlation with the hard X-ray band and the ~60–80 ms flat QPO lag across 2–150 keV — are obtained directly from DCFs and cross-spectra of the observed light curves (Sections 3.2–3.4), not from a fitted model that is then relabelled as a prediction. No equation in the paper defines the output in terms of an input parameter fitted to the same data; there is no equivalent-input/output step to exhibit. The self-citations (Vincentelli et al. 2025; Ma et al. 2025; Veledina et al. 2018, 2021) are used for data-reduction details and for interpretive context, and the central numbers do not reduce to those references. Section 4.1's decomposition of the DCF into a broadband anti-correlated component plus a coherent QPO modulation is an interpretation, and the paper itself notes in Section 3.3 that the lag spectra 'may also be interpreted as consisting of a QPO phase lag superimposed on an underlying broadband lag component'; however, an untested or ambiguous decomposition is a statistical-validity concern, not circular reasoning. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggled via citation, or renaming of a known result as a new derivation is present. The only mild issue is reliance on earlier papers by overlapping authors for pipeline and model context, but that reliance is not load-bearing for the measured lag values.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central measurements are phenomenological; they do not introduce ad hoc parameters in a derivation. The fitted QPO parameters and hand-picked frequency bands are standard analysis choices. The interpretive weight is carried by external hot-flow/jet models and by the assumption that HE X-rays trace the same variability component across 2–150 keV.

free parameters (4)
  • QPO centroid frequency (ν_c) per band = i_s: 1.36±0.04 Hz; LE: 1.392±0.008 Hz
    Fitted with Lorentzians to define the QPO integration range and compare OIR/X-ray QPO periods (Section 3.1).
  • QPO FWHM per band = Resulting integration band 1.22–1.58 Hz
    Used to compute QPO lags; choosing ν_c±FWHM affects the quoted lag values (Section 3.3).
  • LFBN/HFBN frequency intervals = 0.05–0.2 Hz; 4–5 Hz
    Chosen by hand to minimise contamination from the QPO fundamental and harmonics; the energy-dependent lag results depend on these intervals (Section 3.3).
  • Power-law index of X-ray QPO absolute-rms spectrum = -1.61±0.14
    Fit to measured QPO absolute rms versus energy; used to argue against an unbroken jet-synchrotron origin for the hard X-ray QPO (Section 4.2).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Poisson noise can be estimated and subtracted in each band, and HXMT small-FOV background is negligible.
    Required to trust the PDS and cross-spectral amplitudes (Section 3.1 and footnote 1).
  • domain assumption The variability is stationary over the 0.99–2.34 ks simultaneous intervals.
    PDS and DCF are averaged over the whole observation; no segment-to-segment stability test is shown.
  • domain assumption The HE (27–150 keV) band is dominated by Comptonisation and is a cleaner probe of the hot flow/jet than softer bands.
    Intro, Section 1; the anti-correlation interpretation depends on associating HE with hot-flow Comptonisation rather than with reflection or a separate jet component.
  • domain assumption The hot-flow SSC and jet internal-shock models (Veledina et al. 2011, 2013a; Malzac et al. 2018) are valid descriptions of OIR/X-ray coupling.
    Discussion uses these external models to interpret the anti-correlation and QPO lag; they are not derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Energy-dependent Optical/Near-infrared and X-ray Correlations in Swift J1727.8-1613." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BNZCJWJN

@misc{pith2026260728852,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Energy-dependent Optical/Near-infrared and X-ray Correlations in Swift J1727.8-1613},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BNZCJWJN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28852}
}
read the original abstract

We present a timing analysis of the black hole transient Swift J1727.8-1613 during its intermediate state. We use coordinated broadband X-ray observations from Insight-HXMT (2-150 keV), together with optical data from ULTRACAM (g_s and i_s bands) and near-infrared data from HAWK-I (K_s band), obtained on 2023 September 9. As shown by previous studies, the Fourier power spectrum shows a strong quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) in the K_s, i_s and X-ray bands. Cross-correlation analysis reveals a complex coupling between the optical/near-infrared (OIR) and X-ray emission, including a delayed optical anti-correlation, a strong infrared correlation, and a pronounced dependence of these features on X-ray energy, suggesting multiple Comptonisation regions. In contrast, the lag properties do not change at the QPO frequency, displaying an OIR lag of ~60-80 ms up to 150 keV. We discuss these results in the context of small-scale jet and hot accretion flow scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28852 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: HXMT light curves of Swift J1727.8–1613 in the LE (2–10 keV; light blue), ME (10–35 keV; medium blue) and HE (27–150 keV; dark blue) bands, respectively. The orange vertical line marks the simultaneous ultracam observation analyzed in this work. Right panel: HID of the source. The hardness is defined as the photon count-rate ratio between the 6–10 keV and 2–6 keV bands, while intensity corresponds to the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. PDS of Swift J1727.8–1613 in the X-ray (LE: 2–10 keV, ME: 10–35 keV, and HE: 27–150 keV; shown from light to dark blue), optical (𝑔𝑠 and 𝑖𝑠; yellow and orange), and NIR (𝐾𝑠; red) bands. For visual clarity, the 𝑔𝑠 and 𝐾𝑠 PDS are multiplied by factors of 3 and 0.07, respectively. The grey shaded region marks the QPO frequency range (𝑣𝑐±FWHM) derived from the X-ray data. 3 DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 3.1 Power density sp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. From top to bottom, the DCFs of the 𝐾𝑠, 𝑖𝑠, and 𝑔𝑠 bands w.r.t. the LE (2–10 keV) and HE (27–150 keV) bands of Swift J1727.8–1613 are shown. The correlations with the LE and HE bands are marked by light/dark red triangles/dots, light/dark orange triangles/dots, and light/dark yellow tri￾angles/dots, respectively. In all panels, the X-ray band is taken as the reference band. The inset panels show zoomed-in views of t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coherence (top panel), phase lag (middle panel) and time lag (bottom panel) of optical (𝑖𝑠) w.r.t. LE (2–10 keV; left panel) and HE (27– 150 keV; right panel) bands for Swift J1727.8–1613. A positive lag denotes optical lagging X-rays. The orange, red, and blue shaded …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase-lag (top panel) and time-lag (bottom panel) spectra of the optical (𝑖𝑠) band w.r.t the X-ray band (2–150 keV) for Swift J1727.8–1613. The left panels show the results for the LFBN (red open symbols; 0.05–0.2 Hz) and HFBN (blue filled symbols; 4–5 Hz), while the r…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top panel: Model-unfolded spectra of Swift J1727.8–1613 observed with HXMT in the 2–150 keV band at different flux levels. The data were divided into three flux intervals based on the median count rate. The light, medium, and dark blue spectra correspond to the low-, m…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: QPO rms (left) and absolute rms (right) of Swift J1727.8–1613 in NIR (𝐾𝑠), optical (𝑖𝑠 and 𝑔𝑠), and X-ray (2–150 keV). Since no significant QPO was detected in the 𝑔𝑠 band, only an upper limit on the QPO absolute rms is shown for this band. be stronger in X-rays than i…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Belloni T., Hasinger G., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...227L..33B 227, L33

    1990

  2. [2]

    Belloni T., Psaltis D., van der Klis M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340290 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...572..392B 572, 392

    doi:10.1086/340290 2002

  3. [3]

    Bollemeijer N., Uttley P., You B., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf750 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.540.1394B 540, 1394

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staf750 2025

  4. [4]

    Cao X., et al., 2020, @doi [Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy] 10.1007/s11433-019-1506-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020SCPMA..6349504C 63, 249504

    doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1506-1 2020

  5. [6]

    A., Dewangan G

    Chand S., Zdziarski A. A., Dewangan G. C., Sahu P., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae45aa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1000..137C 1000, 137

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae45aa 2026

  6. [7]

    Chen Y., et al., 2020, @doi [Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy] 10.1007/s11433-019-1469-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020SCPMA..6349505C 63, 249505

    doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1469-5 2020

  7. [9]

    Done C., Gierli \'n ski M., Kubota A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&ARv..15....1D 15, 1

    doi:10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1 2007

  8. [10]

    Du D., You B., Yan Z., Cao X., Hameury J.-M., Wu Y., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf1607 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.543.2575D 543, 2575

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1607 2025

Show all 134 references
  1. [11]

    P., Miller J., Dhillon V

    Durant M., Gandhi P., Shahbaz T., Fabian A. P., Miller J., Dhillon V. S., Marsh T. R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590906 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...682L..45D 682, L45

    2008 doi

  2. [14]

    Fan X., You B., Du D., He H., Yang S., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2a2d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ...997....7F 997, 7

    2026 doi

  3. [16]

    C., Blaes O

    Fragile P. C., Blaes O. M., Anninos P., Salmonson J. D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521092 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...668..417F 668, 417

    2007 doi

  4. [19]

    Gandhi P., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0273-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1..859G 1, 859

    2017 doi

  5. [25]

    Ingram A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3faf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...968...76I 968, 76

    2024 doi

  6. [26]

    K., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554353 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A...9J 699, A9

    Jin P., M \'e ndez M., Garc \' a F., Altamirano D., Zhang G., Rout S. K., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554353 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A...9J 699, A9

    2025 doi

  7. [27]

    Kalamkar M., Casella P., Uttley P., O'Brien K., Russell D., Maccarone T., van der Klis M., Vincentelli F., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.3284K 460, 3284

    2016 doi

  8. [29]

    Li Z.-X., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202555276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...707A..33L 707, A33

    2026 doi

  9. [30]

    Liu C., et al., 2020, @doi [Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy] 10.1007/s11433-019-1486-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020SCPMA..6349503L 63, 249503

    2020 doi

  10. [32]

    Ma X., et al., 2021, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-1192-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatAs...5...94M 5, 94

    2021 doi

  11. [33]

    Ma R., M \'e ndez M., Garc \' a F., Sai N., Zhang L., Zhang Y., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2284 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525..854M 525, 854

    2023 doi

  12. [35]

    Malzac J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1144 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443..299M 443, 299

    2014 doi

  13. [37]

    Malzac J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.2054M 480, 2054

    2018 doi

  14. [38]

    Markoff S., Falcke H., Fender R., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010420 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...372L..25M 372, L25

    2001 doi

  15. [39]

    D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...662A.118M 662, A118

    Mastichiadis A., Petropoulou M., Kylafis N. D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...662A.118M 662, A118

    2022 doi

  16. [40]

    Mata S \'a nchez D., Torres M. A. P., Casares J., Mu \ n oz-Darias T., Armas Padilla M., Yanes-Rizo I. V., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...693A.129M 693, A129

    2025 doi

  17. [42]

    J., Page C

    Motch C., Ricketts M. J., Page C. G., Ilovaisky S. A., Chevalier C., 1983, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983A&A...119..171M 119, 171

    1983

  18. [43]

    A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slz148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490L..62P 490, L62

    Paice J. A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slz148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490L..62P 490, L62

    2019 doi

  19. [44]

    A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1531 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.3452P 505, 3452

    Paice J. A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1531 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.3452P 505, 3452

    2021 doi

  20. [45]

    M., Parsotan T

    Palmer D. M., Parsotan T. M., 2023, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ATel16215....1P 16215, 1

    2023

  21. [47]

    Poutanen J., Veledina A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-013-0033-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014SSRv..183...61P 183, 61

    2014 doi

  22. [48]

    Poutanen J., Vurm I., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/L97 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...690L..97P 690, L97

    2009 doi

  23. [49]

    G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.3987P 445, 3987

    Poutanen J., Veledina A., Revnivtsev M. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.3987P 445, 3987

    2014 doi

  24. [51]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts377 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429..815R 429, 815

    Russell D. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts377 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429..815R 429, 815

    2013 doi

  25. [52]

    K., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slab132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513L..35T 513, L35

    Thomas J. K., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slab132 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513L..35T 513, L35

    2022 doi

  26. [53]

    Uttley P., Casella P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-014-0072-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014SSRv..183..453U 183, 453

    2014 doi

  27. [54]

    Veledina A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2556 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.4236V 481, 4236

    2018 doi

  28. [55]

    Veledina A., Poutanen J., Vurm I., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737L..17V 737, L17

    2011 doi

  29. [56]

    Veledina A., Poutanen J., Vurm I., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.3196V 430, 3196

    doi

  30. [57]

    Veledina A., Poutanen J., Ingram A., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778..165V 778, 165

    doi

  31. [58]

    G., Durant M., Gandhi P., Poutanen J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2201 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.2855V 454, 2855

    Veledina A., Revnivtsev M. G., Durant M., Gandhi P., Poutanen J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2201 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.2855V 454, 2855

    2015 doi

  32. [59]

    Veledina A., Gandhi P., Hynes R., Kajava J. J. E., Tsygankov S. S., Revnivtsev M. G., Durant M., Poutanen J., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1207 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470...48V 470, 48

    2017 doi

  33. [60]

    Veledina A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0781 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...958L..16V 958, L16

    2023 doi

  34. [61]

    M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887L..19V 887, L19

    Vincentelli F. M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887L..19V 887, L19

    2019 doi

  35. [62]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503..614V 503, 614

    Vincentelli F. M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503..614V 503, 614

    2021 doi

  36. [63]

    M., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf600 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.539.2347V 539, 2347

    Vincentelli F. M., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf600 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.539.2347V 539, 2347

    2025 doi

  37. [65]

    Xu S.-E., You B., Long Y., He H., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae058a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...993...40X 993, 40

    2025 doi

  38. [66]

    Yang Z.-X., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad60bd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970L..33Y 970, L33

    2024 doi

  39. [67]

    Yang S.-K., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1000...20Y 1000, 20

    2026 doi

  40. [68]

    T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858...82Y 858, 82

    You B., Bursa M., \.Z ycki P. T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858...82Y 858, 82

    2018 doi

  41. [69]

    You B., et al., 2021, @doi [Nature Communications] 10.1038/s41467-021-21169-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatCo..12.1025Y 12, 1025

    2021 doi

  42. [70]

    You B., et al., 2023, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.abo4504 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Sci...381..961Y 381, 961

    2023 doi

  43. [71]

    You B., Yu W., Ingram A., De Marco B., Qu J.-L., Zhu Z.-H., Santangelo A., Xu S.-E., 2026, @doi [Nature Communications] 10.1038/s41467-026-69604-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026NatCo..17.2860Y 17, 2860

    2026 doi

  44. [72]

    Yu W., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae835 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.4624Y 529, 4624

    2024 doi

  45. [73]

    A., Gierli \'n ski M., 2004, @doi [Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement] 10.1143/PTPS.155.99 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PThPS.155...99Z 155, 99

    Zdziarski A. A., Gierli \'n ski M., 2004, @doi [Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement] 10.1143/PTPS.155.99 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PThPS.155...99Z 155, 99

    2004 doi

  46. [74]

    Zhang S.-N., et al., 2020, @doi [Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy] 10.1007/s11433-019-1432-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020SCPMA..6349502Z 63, 249502

    2020 doi

  47. [75]

    Zhao Q.-C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1e6c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...961L..42Z 961, L42

    2024 doi

  48. [76]

    , keywords =

    Echo mapping of Swift J1753.5-0127. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15260.x , archivePrefix =. 0906.2773 , primaryClass =

    2009

  49. [77]

    , keywords =

    Interplay of spectral components in timing properties of accreting compact objects. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2556 , archivePrefix =. 1809.06053 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  50. [78]

    , keywords =

    Modelling Spectral and Timing Properties of Accreting Black Holes: The Hybrid Hot Flow Paradigm. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-013-0033-3 , archivePrefix =. 1312.2761 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  51. [79]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of X-Ray Polarization from the Black Hole Transient Swift J1727.8-1613. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0781 , archivePrefix =. 2309.15928 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  52. [80]

    , keywords =

    Variability in the noise properties of Cygnus X-1. , keywords =

  53. [81]

    , keywords =

    A Unified Description of the Timing Features of Accreting X-Ray Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/340290 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0202213 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  54. [82]

    , keywords =

    A broad-band spectral-timing study of QPOs in the bright black hole X-ray binary Swift J1727.8 - 1613. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf750 , archivePrefix =. 2505.05060 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  55. [83]

    , keywords =

    Fast infrared variability from a relativistic jet in GX 339-4. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00826.x , archivePrefix =. 1002.1233 , primaryClass =

    2010

  56. [84]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =

    The Medium Energy X-ray telescope (ME) onboard the Insight-HXMT astronomy satellite. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1506-1 , archivePrefix =. 1910.04451 , primaryClass =

    1910

  57. [85]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of the Inner Accretion Flow in Swift J1727.8─1613 across Intermediate States: Insights from Broadband Spectral and Timing Analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae45aa , archivePrefix =. 2512.05544 , primaryClass =

  58. [86]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =

    The Low Energy X-ray telescope (LE) onboard the Insight-HXMT astronomy satellite. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1469-5 , archivePrefix =. 1910.08319 , primaryClass =

    1910 arXiv

  59. [87]

    , keywords =

    ULTRACAM: an ultrafast, triple-beam CCD camera for high-speed astrophysics. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11881.x , archivePrefix =. 0704.2557 , primaryClass =

    2007

  60. [88]

    Everything you always wanted to know about accretion but were afraid to ask

    Modelling the behaviour of accretion flows in X-ray binaries. Everything you always wanted to know about accretion but were afraid to ask. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-007-0006-1 , archivePrefix =. 0708.0148 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  61. [89]

    , keywords =

    A comprehensive study of time delay between optical/near-infrared and X-ray emissions in black hole X-ray binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1607 , archivePrefix =. 2507.00578 , primaryClass =

  62. [90]

    , keywords =

    SWIFT J1753.5-0127: A Surprising Optical/X-Ray Cross-Correlation Function. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/590906 , archivePrefix =. 0806.2530 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  63. [91]

    , keywords =

    Multiwavelength spectral and high time resolution observations of SWIFTJ1753.5-0127: new activity?. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14044.x , archivePrefix =. 0810.1141 , primaryClass =

    2008

  64. [92]

    , keywords =

    The Discrete Correlation Function: A New Method for Analyzing Unevenly Sampled Variability Data. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/166773 , adsurl =

    doi

  65. [93]

    , keywords =

    On the Optical Emission in the Minioutburst of the Black Hole X-Ray Binary MAXI J1348-630. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2a2d , archivePrefix =. 2508.19645 , primaryClass =

  66. [95]

    , keywords =

    Global General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of a Tilted Black Hole Accretion Disk. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/521092 , archivePrefix =. 0706.4303 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  67. [96]

    , keywords =

    Rapid optical and X-ray timing observations of GX 339-4: flux correlations at the onset of a low/hard state. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00529.x , archivePrefix =. 0807.1529 , primaryClass =

    2008

  68. [97]

    , keywords =

    Rapid optical and X-ray timing observations of GX339-4: multicomponent optical variability in the low/hard state. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17083.x , archivePrefix =. 1005.4685 , primaryClass =

    2010

  69. [98]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    An elevation of 0.1 light-seconds for the optical jet base in an accreting Galactic black hole system. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0273-3 , archivePrefix =. 1710.09838 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  70. [99]

    , keywords =

    Estimating black hole spin from AGN SED fitting: the impact of general-relativistic ray tracing. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2499 , archivePrefix =. 2304.01253 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  71. [100]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Dynamic disk-corona coupling during the state transition of Swift J1727.8-1613. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.01384 , archivePrefix =. 2508.01384 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  72. [101]

    , keywords =

    The remarkable rapid X-ray, ultraviolet, optical and infrared variability in the black hole XTE J1118+480. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06938.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0306626 , primaryClass =

    2003

  73. [102]

    , keywords =

    Low-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations spectra and Lense-Thirring precession. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00693.x , archivePrefix =. 0901.1238 , primaryClass =

    2009

  74. [103]

    , keywords =

    A review of quasi-periodic oscillations from black hole X-ray binaries: Observation and theory. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2020.101524 , archivePrefix =. 2001.08758 , primaryClass =

    2020

  75. [104]

    , keywords =

    Tracking the X-Ray Polarization of the Black Hole Transient Swift J1727.8─1613 during a State Transition. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3faf , archivePrefix =. 2311.05497 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  76. [105]

    , keywords =

    Timing analysis of the black hole candidate Swift J1727.8─1613: Detection of a dip-like feature in the high-energy cross spectrum. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554353 , archivePrefix =. 2504.20717 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  77. [106]

    , keywords =

    Detection of the first infra-red quasi-periodic oscillation in a black hole X-ray binary. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1211 , archivePrefix =. 1510.08907 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  78. [107]

    , year = 2001, month = nov, volume =

    Correlated fast X-ray and optical variability in the black-hole candidate XTE J1118+480. , year = 2001, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1038/35102515 , adsurl =

    2001 doi

  79. [108]

    , keywords =

    A physical model of the broad-band continuum of AGN and its implications for the UV/X relation and optical variability. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1890 , archivePrefix =. 1804.00171 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  80. [109]

    , keywords =

    Characteristics of the high-frequency humps in the black hole X-ray binary Swift J1727.8─1613. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555276 , archivePrefix =. 2601.03696 , primaryClass =

  81. [110]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =

    The High Energy X-ray telescope (HE) onboard the Insight-HXMT astronomy satellite. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1486-x , archivePrefix =. 1910.04955 , primaryClass =

    1910

  82. [111]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Broadband X-ray Spectral Properties during the Rising Phases of the Outburst of the New Black Hole X-ray Binary Candidate Swift J1727.8-1613. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.03834 , archivePrefix =. 2406.03834 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  83. [112]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Discovery of oscillations above 200 keV in a black hole X-ray binary with Insight-HXMT. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1192-2 , archivePrefix =. 2009.10607 , primaryClass =

    2009 arXiv

  84. [113]

    , keywords =

    A variable corona during the transition from type-C to type-B quasi-periodic oscillations in the black hole X-ray binary MAXI J1820+070. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2284 , archivePrefix =. 2307.12728 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  85. [114]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Testing the Lense-Thirring Precession Origin of the QPO in Swift J1727.8 - 1613. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.18857 , archivePrefix =. 2506.18857 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  86. [115]

    , keywords =

    Jet-disc coupling through a common energy reservoir in the black hole XTE J1118+480. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07772.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0402674 , primaryClass =

    2004

  87. [116]

    , keywords =

    The spectral energy distribution of compact jets powered by internal shocks. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1144 , archivePrefix =. 1406.2208 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  88. [117]

    , keywords =

    A jet model for the fast IR variability of the black hole X-ray binary GX 339-4. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2006 , archivePrefix =. 1807.09835 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  89. [118]

    Synchrotron emission from radio to X-rays in the Low/Hard spectral state

    A jet model for the broadband spectrum of XTE J1118+480. Synchrotron emission from radio to X-rays in the Low/Hard spectral state. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010420 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0010560 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  90. [119]

    , keywords =

    Going with the Flow: Can the Base of Jets Subsume the Role of Compact Accretion Disk Coronae?. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/497628 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0509028 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  91. [120]

    , keywords =

    A study of natural frequencies in a dynamic corona - disk system. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243397 , archivePrefix =. 2204.14139 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  92. [121]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical confirmation of a black hole in the X-ray transient Swift J1727.8 - 1613. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451960 , archivePrefix =. 2408.13310 , primaryClass =

  93. [122]

    , keywords =

    Canonical Time Variations of X-Rays from Black Hole Candidates in the Low-Intensity State. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/186389 , adsurl =

    doi

  94. [123]

    , keywords =

    Simultaneous X-ray/optical observations of GX 339-4 during the May 1981 optically bright state. , keywords =

    1981

  95. [124]

    , keywords =

    A black hole X-ray binary at 100 Hz: multiwavelength timing of MAXI J1820+070 with HiPERCAM and NICER. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz148 , archivePrefix =. 1910.04174 , primaryClass =

    1910 arXiv

  96. [125]

    , keywords =

    The evolution of rapid optical/X-ray timing correlations in the initial hard state of MAXI J1820+070. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1531 , archivePrefix =. 2105.11769 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  97. [126]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Swift J1727.8-1613 reaches 7.6 Crab with strong QPO in Hard X-rays. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  98. [127]

    , keywords =

    NICER, NuSTAR, and Insight-HXMT Views to the Newly Discovered Black Hole X-Ray Binary Swift J1727.8-1613. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad17ca , archivePrefix =. 2503.01223 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  99. [128]

    Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy , year = 2004, editor =

    HAWK-I: A new wide-field 1- to 2.5- m imager for the VLT. Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy , year = 2004, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.578293 , adsurl =

    2004 doi

  100. [129]

    , keywords =

    On the Origin of Spectral States in Accreting Black Holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/L97 , archivePrefix =. 0807.3073 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  101. [130]

    , keywords =

    Colours of black holes: infrared flares from the hot accretion disc in XTE J1550-564. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1989 , archivePrefix =. 1409.6504 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  102. [131]

    , keywords =

    X-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0606352 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  103. [132]

    , keywords =

    Jet spectral breaks in black hole X-ray binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts377 , archivePrefix =. 1211.1655 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  104. [133]

    , keywords =

    Synchronous X-ray/optical quasi-periodic oscillations from the black hole LMXB MAXI J1820+070. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slab132 , archivePrefix =. 2111.13642 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  105. [134]

    Accretion and Ejection at the Fastest Timescales

    Multi-Wavelength Variability. Accretion and Ejection at the Fastest Timescales. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0072-4 , archivePrefix =. 1501.02117 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  106. [135]

    , keywords =

    A Synchrotron Self-Compton-Disk Reprocessing Model for Optical/X-Ray Correlation in Black Hole X-Ray Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/737/1/L17 , archivePrefix =. 1105.2744 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  107. [136]

    , keywords =

    Hot accretion flow in black hole binaries: a link connecting X-rays to the infrared. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt124 , archivePrefix =. 1210.0236 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  108. [137]

    , keywords =

    A Unified Lense-Thirring Precession Model for Optical and X-Ray Quasi-periodic Oscillations in Black Hole Binaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/165 , archivePrefix =. 1310.3821 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  109. [138]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of correlated optical/X-ray quasi-periodic oscillations in black hole binary SWIFT J1753.5-0127. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2201 , archivePrefix =. 1509.06768 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  110. [139]

    , keywords =

    Expanding hot flow in the black hole binary SWIFT J1753.5-0127: evidence from optical timing. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1207 , archivePrefix =. 1611.04401 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  111. [140]

    , keywords =

    Characterization of the infrared/X-ray subsecond variability for the black hole transient GX 339-4. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty710 , archivePrefix =. 1803.05915 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  112. [141]

    , keywords =

    Physical Constraints from Near-infrared Fast Photometry of the Black Hole Transient GX 339-4. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab5860 , archivePrefix =. 1911.06332 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  113. [142]

    , keywords =

    Fast infrared variability from the black hole candidate MAXI J1535-571 and tight constraints on the modelling. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab475 , archivePrefix =. 2102.06710 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  114. [143]

    , keywords =

    Sub-second optical/near-infrared quasi-periodic oscillations from the black hole X-ray transient Swift J1727.8 1613. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf600 , archivePrefix =. 2503.20862 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  115. [144]

    , keywords =

    Effects of non-thermal tails in Maxwellian electron distributions on synchrotron and Compton processes. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04387.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0102035 , primaryClass =

    2001

  116. [145]

    , keywords =

    Temporal Evolution of Quasiperiodic Oscillations in an Accreting Black Hole Swift J1727.8-1613: Coevolution of the Disk─Corona during the State Transition. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae058a , archivePrefix =. 2506.21131 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  117. [146]

    , keywords =

    A Timing View of the Additional High-energy Spectral Component Discovered in the Black Hole Candidate Swift J1727.8-1613. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad60bd , archivePrefix =. 2407.05236 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  118. [147]

    , keywords =

    Covariance Spectrum of MAXI J1820+070: On the Nature of the Comptonizing Flow. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4724 , archivePrefix =. 2511.17285 , primaryClass =

  119. [148]

    X-Ray Quasi-periodic Oscillations in the Lense-Thirring Precession Model. I. Variability of Relativistic Continuum. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabd33 , archivePrefix =. 1801.04028 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  120. [149]

    Nature Communications , keywords =

    Insight-HXMT observations of jet-like corona in a black hole X-ray binary MAXI J1820+070. Nature Communications , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21169-5 , archivePrefix =. 2102.07602 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  121. [150]

    Science , keywords =

    Observations of a black hole x-ray binary indicate formation of a magnetically arrested disk. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.abo4504 , archivePrefix =. 2309.00200 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  122. [151]

    Nature Communications , keywords =

    Reverberation lags viewed in hard X-rays from an accreting stellar-mass black hole. Nature Communications , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69604-9 , archivePrefix =. 2509.16608 , primaryClass =

  123. [152]

    , keywords =

    Timing analysis of the newly discovered black hole candidate Swift J1727.8-1613 with Insight-HXMT. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae835 , archivePrefix =. 2403.13127 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  124. [153]

    Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement , keywords =

    Radiative Processes, Spectral States and Variability of Black-Hole Binaries. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement , keywords =. doi:10.1143/PTPS.155.99 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0403683 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  125. [154]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =

    Overview to the Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (Insight-HXMT) Satellite. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1432-6 , archivePrefix =. 1910.09613 , primaryClass =

    1910 arXiv

  126. [155]

    , keywords =

    The First Polarimetric View on Quasiperiodic Oscillations in a Black Hole X-Ray Binary. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad1e6c , archivePrefix =. 2401.08970 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.