Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Mapping Microscopic and Systemic Risks in TradFi and DeFi: a literature review

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DeFi shocks can spread into traditional finance, and traditional finance into DeFi.

desk verdict A coherent abstract proposing a 'crosstagion' label for bidirectional TradFi-DeFi spillovers, but the full-text file is corrupted and unreadable, so the substantive claims cannot currently be verified. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.12007 v1 pith:BQEG4IYY submitted 2025-08-16 q-fin.RM econ.GNq-fin.ECq-fin.GN

Sabrina Aufiero , Silvia Bartolucci , Fabio Caccioli , Pierpaolo Vivo This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-fin.RMecon.GNq-fin.ECq-fin.GN
keywords systemicriskdecentralizedfinancetraditionalcrosstagioncontagionleveragecyclesliquiditycrisescomposability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This literature review argues that traditional finance and decentralized finance are not separate risk zones: instability in one can cascade into the other, a process it names crosstagion. It proposes a conceptual framework that maps how systemic risk forms in TradFi, through leverage cycles, liquidity crises, and entangled institutional exposures, and how the same family of risks emerges differently in DeFi through composability, smart-contract vulnerabilities, and algorithmic mechanisms. The framework pairs risks with similar roots, such as liquidity shocks and trading vulnerabilities, but shows why they propagate differently under the two architectures. If the argument holds, risk analysis and regulation must treat the TradFi–DeFi pair as a coupled system rather than as two independent ones.

What carries the argument

The central object is the conceptual risk map together with the coined term crosstagion. The map sets TradFi mechanisms, such as leverage cycles, liquidity spirals, and interconnected institutional exposures, beside DeFi mechanisms, such as composability, smart-contract failure, oracle risk, and automated liquidation, and identifies correspondences between them. Crosstagion names the bidirectional contagion channel that turns the two maps into one coupled system; it is the mechanism that the paper argues risk models and regulators must include to capture systemic risk at the intersection.

What would settle it

A study that tracks a major DeFi liquidity crisis and finds no measurable tightening in TradFi funding or credit markets, after controlling for common shocks such as interest-rate moves, would undercut the crosstagion claim; likewise, a regulatory shock confined to TradFi that leaves DeFi volumes and collateral health unchanged would cut the reverse direction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that systemic risk has a bidirectional cross-system channel: financial instability originating in decentralized finance can spill into traditional finance, and instability originating in traditional finance can spill into decentralized finance, a coupling it calls crosstagion. It supports this claim by reviewing risk formation in each system side by side and identifying structural differences, including DeFi's permissionlessness, composability, blockchain settlement, and algorithm-driven protocols versus TradFi's intermediaries, collateral chains, and regulation, that change how otherwise similar risks propagate. Because the work is a literature review, its contribution is a conceptual synthesis and a proposed vocabulary for the hybrid financial ecosystem rather than new measured evidence of a specific spillover event.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's load-bearing premise is that TradFi and DeFi are already interdependent enough that stress in one system materially reaches the other; the review cites that interdependence but does not itself measure its strength.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Regulators and central banks would need to monitor DeFi leverage and liquidity as inputs to TradFi financial stability, not as an isolated crypto sector.
  • Stress tests and systemic-risk models that ignore the TradFi–DeFi boundary would understate crisis severity when both systems are under pressure.
  • A liquidity crisis inside a DeFi lending protocol could reach TradFi through stablecoin reserves, institutional counterparty exposure, or arbitrage-linked balance sheets.
  • A regulatory or political event in one system could trigger cascade dynamics in the other, making policy design itself a risk channel.
  • DeFi-specific features such as composability would matter for systemic risk because they change the speed and reach of contagion, not just its location.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural empirical extension is to measure crosstagion directly with tail-dependence or connectedness indices across TradFi and DeFi stress indicators; the paper supplies the channel list but not the metric.
  • Stablecoin issuers and custodians look like the physical hinge of crosstagion, since their reserves sit in TradFi while their tokens circulate in DeFi, making a run on either side the most direct mechanical path for a two-way spillover.
  • The same mapping could be extended to other hybrid financial layers, such as tokenized assets or central bank digital currencies, which inherit TradFi liabilities and DeFi programmability.
  • If crosstagion matures as a concept, it may push systemic-risk regulation toward one consolidated map of collateral, leverage, and liquidity regardless of the settlement layer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper claims to be a literature review and conceptual mapping of systemic risk formation in traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). The abstract proposes that well-known risk mechanisms in TradFi—leverage cycles, liquidity crises, and institutional exposures—have counterparts in DeFi that operate through distinct structural features such as composability, smart contract vulnerabilities, and algorithm-driven mechanisms. The paper introduces the term "crosstagion" to describe a bidirectional spillover process in which instability in DeFi propagates to TradFi and vice versa, and it asserts that growing interdependence between the two ecosystems makes such cross-system risk important for regulators and policymakers. The full text as supplied to me is corrupted and unreadable, so the only verifiable content is the abstract; the body of the review, the conceptual mapping, and the claimed illustrations of crosstagion cannot be inspected.

Significance. The topic is timely and policy-relevant, and "crosstagion" is a potentially useful shorthand for a phenomenon that regulators and market participants are beginning to take seriously. If the literature review is comprehensive, accurate, and systematic, the paper could serve as a helpful organizing reference for researchers and policymakers working at the TradFi–DeFi interface. The paper does not provide machine-checked proofs, code, or falsifiable predictions, and for a literature review the evidentiary weight rests entirely on the quality and coverage of the cited sources. The central empirical premise—that TradFi–DeFi interdependence is already significant enough to make cross-system spillovers a first-order risk—is asserted in the abstract but not documented there, and the unreadable full text prevents me from verifying whether the cited literature establishes it.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim that "crosstagion" is a bidirectional process whereby instability in DeFi spills over into TradFi and vice versa is logically dependent on the premise of "their growing interdependence" stated in the abstract. The abstract provides no measurement, citation, concrete episode, or other evidence for this premise, and because the full text is unreadable, I cannot determine whether the cited literature establishes it. This is load-bearing: if the interdependence is weak or not yet first-order, then "crosstagion" is a label for a hypothetical channel rather than a documented systemic risk.
  2. [Full text (entire body)] The submitted full text is corrupted and appears as mojibake; none of the comparative framework, the DeFi-specific risk channels, the conceptual mapping, or the illustrations of crosstagion can be read or checked. The authors need to resubmit a readable version before the scientific content of the paper can be evaluated. As it stands, the manuscript is not assessable beyond the abstract.
  3. [Review methodology (wherever it appears)] For a literature review to support a comparative framework and a new concept such as crosstagion, the manuscript should state its search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the time period and sources covered. The abstract does not provide these details, and the unreadable text prevents me from verifying whether the review is systematic rather than selective. Without access to the methodology, the completeness and reproducibility of the mapping cannot be assessed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The term "crosstagion" is introduced without explicit contrast to existing terms such as "contagion" or "financial contagion"; a sentence distinguishing the new concept from prior usage would improve clarity.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase "algorithm-driven mechanisms" is vague; specifying the intended mechanisms (for example, liquidation engines, oracle failures, or arbitrage bots) would make the abstract more informative.
  3. [Abstract] The statement that "political developments" can cascade across TradFi and DeFi is not elaborated in the abstract; if this channel is important to the framework, it should be clarified, and if not, the mention could be removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: crosstagion is an explicitly introduced definition, not a prediction derived from its own assumptions.

full rationale

The paper is a literature review whose central contribution is the explicitly introduced concept of crosstagion, defined in the abstract as 'a bidirectional process where instability in DeFi can spill over into TradFi, and vice versa.' This is a definition and an organizing label for mechanisms assembled from existing literature, not a quantitative prediction fitted to data. The paper grounds TradFi mechanisms in 'well-established mechanisms such as leverage cycles, liquidity crises, and interconnected institutional exposures' and DeFi features in 'unique structural and technological characteristics,' all of which are external inputs rather than outputs of the paper's own argument. The subsequent language about disruptions 'cascad[ing] across these systems, leveraging their growing interdependence' is an illustrative consequence of the definition plus cited mechanisms, not a derived result that reduces to the definition by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no self-citation chain is visible in the readable text. Even if 'crosstagion' is a neologism for cross-system contagion, a label is not a derivation; pattern 6 would require the paper to present the renaming as a formal result, which it does not. The provided full text is largely unreadable due to encoding corruption, so a full citation-by-citation audit is impossible, but no circular step can be exhibited from the available abstract and readable passages. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's framework relies on broad domain assumptions from financial literature rather than fitted parameters. The term crosstagion is a conceptual label, not an invented physical entity.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Leverage cycles, liquidity crises, and interconnected institutional exposures are well-established mechanisms of systemic risk in TradFi.
    The abstract invokes these as grounding for the TradFi part of the framework.
  • domain assumption DeFi is characterized by composability, smart contract vulnerabilities, and algorithm-driven mechanisms.
    The abstract relies on these features to distinguish DeFi risk propagation.
  • domain assumption TradFi and DeFi are increasingly interconnected.
    The crosstagion concept depends on this premise; the abstract claims it as background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mapping Microscopic and Systemic Risks in TradFi and DeFi: a literature review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQEG4IYY

@misc{pith2026250812007,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mapping Microscopic and Systemic Risks in TradFi and DeFi: a literature review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQEG4IYY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.12007}
}
read the original abstract

This work explores the formation and propagation of systemic risks across traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi), offering a comparative framework that bridges these two increasingly interconnected ecosystems. We propose a conceptual model for systemic risk formation in TradFi, grounded in well-established mechanisms such as leverage cycles, liquidity crises, and interconnected institutional exposures. Extending this analysis to DeFi, we identify unique structural and technological characteristics - such as composability, smart contract vulnerabilities, and algorithm-driven mechanisms - that shape the emergence and transmission of risks within decentralized systems. Through a conceptual mapping, we highlight risks with similar foundations (e.g., trading vulnerabilities, liquidity shocks), while emphasizing how these risks manifest and propagate differently due to the contrasting architectures of TradFi and DeFi. Furthermore, we introduce the concept of crosstagion, a bidirectional process where instability in DeFi can spill over into TradFi, and vice versa. We illustrate how disruptions such as liquidity crises, regulatory actions, or political developments can cascade across these systems, leveraging their growing interdependence. By analyzing this mutual dynamics, we highlight the importance of understanding systemic risks not only within TradFi and DeFi individually, but also at their intersection. Our findings contribute to the evolving discourse on risk management in a hybrid financial ecosystem, offering insights for policymakers, regulators, and financial stakeholders navigating this complex landscape.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeXposure-FM: A Time-series, Graph Foundation Model for Credit Exposures and Stability on Decentralized Financial Networks

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned GraphPFN foundation model forecasts DeFi exposure networks and stress-test losses, beating learned baselines everywhere and persistence on link statistics, though not on average stress-test error.

  2. The Extremity Premium: Sentiment Regimes and Adverse Selection in Cryptocurrency Markets

    q-fin.ST 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Extreme sentiment regimes show higher estimated spreads and uncertainty than neutral ones in Bitcoin data, but the effect is sensitive to controls and overlaps mechanically with volatility.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

235 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    rep., MakerDAO, white paper (2017)

    Maker Foundation , The Dai stablecoin system, Tech. rep., MakerDAO, white paper (2017). ://makerdao.com/whitepaper/DaiDec17WP.pdf

    2017

  2. [2]

    K. J. Arrow, G. Debreu, Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1954) 265--290

    1954

  3. [3]

    E. F. Fama, Efficient capital markets, Journal of finance 25 (2) (1970) 383--417

    1970

  4. [4]

    J. F. Muth, Rational expectations and the theory of price movements, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1961) 315--335

    1961

  5. [5]

    Silva, H

    W. Silva, H. Kimura, V. A. Sobreiro, An analysis of the literature on systemic financial risk: A survey, Journal of Financial Stability 28 (2017) 91--114

    2017

  6. [6]

    Grilli, G

    R. Grilli, G. Tedeschi, M. Gallegati, Markets connectivity and financial contagion, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 10 (2015) 287--304

    2015

  7. [7]

    J. C. Rochet and J. Tirole, Interbank lending and systemic risk, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28(4) (1996) 733--762

    1996

  8. [8]

    Allen, D

    F. Allen, D. Gale, Financial contagion, Journal of Political Economy 108 (1) (2000) 1--33

    2000

Show all 235 references
  1. [9]

    C. J. Oort, Banks and the stability of the international financial system, De Economist 138 (4) (1990) 451--463

    1990

  2. [10]

    De Bandt, P

    O. De Bandt, P. Hartmann, Systemic risk: a survey https://ssrn.com/abstract=258430, Available at SSRN 258430 (2000). ://ssrn.com/abstract=258430

    2000

  3. [11]

    Summer, Banking regulation and systemic risk, Open Economies Review 14 (2003) 43--70

    M. Summer, Banking regulation and systemic risk, Open Economies Review 14 (2003) 43--70

    2003

  4. [12]

    Lehar, Measuring systemic risk: A risk management approach, Journal of Banking & Finance 29 (10) (2005) 2577--2603

    A. Lehar, Measuring systemic risk: A risk management approach, Journal of Banking & Finance 29 (10) (2005) 2577--2603

    2005

  5. [13]

    rep., European Central Bank (2009)

    European Central Bank , Financial stability review https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/fsr/financialstabilityreview200912en.pdf, Tech. rep., European Central Bank (2009). ://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/fsr/financialstabilityreview200912en.pdf

    2009

  6. [14]

    Adrian, M

    T. Adrian, M. K. Brunnermeier, CoVaR, The American Economic Review 106 (7) (2016) 1705--1741

    2016

  7. [15]

    Billio, M

    M. Billio, M. Getmansky, A. W. Lo, L. Pelizzon, Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors, Journal of Financial Economics 104 (3) (2012) 535--559

    2012

  8. [16]

    D. K. Patro, M. Qi, X. Sun, A simple indicator of systemic risk, Journal of Financial Stability 9 (1) (2013) 105--116

    2013

  9. [17]

    de Bandt, P

    O. de Bandt, P. Hartmann, J. L. Peydr\'o, Systemic risk in banking: An update, in: A. N. Berger, P. Molyneux, J. O. S. Wilson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Banking, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012, pp. 633--672, online edition, 18 September 2012

    2012

  10. [18]

    Benoit, J.-E

    S. Benoit, J.-E. Colliard, C. Hurlin, C. P \'e rignon, Where the risks lie: A survey on systemic risk, Review of Finance 21 (1) (2017) 109--152

    2017

  11. [19]

    Colander, M

    D. Colander, M. Goldberg, A. Haas, K. Juselius, A. Kirman, T. Lux, B. Sloth, The financial crisis and the systemic failure of the economics profession, Critical Review 21 (2-3) (2009) 249--267

    2009

  12. [20]

    Bardoscia, S

    M. Bardoscia, S. Battiston, F. Caccioli, G. Caldarelli, Pathways towards instability in financial networks, Nature communications 8 (1) (2017) 14416

    2017

  13. [21]

    A. G. Haldane, R. M. May, Systemic risk in banking ecosystems, Nature 469 (7330) (2011) 351--355

    2011

  14. [22]

    M. O. Jackson, A. Pernoud, Systemic risk in financial networks: A survey, Annual Review of Economics 13 (1) (2021) 171--202

    2021

  15. [23]

    D. M. Gale, S. Kariv, Financial networks, American Economic Review 97 (2) (2007) 99--103

    2007

  16. [24]

    Eisenberg, T

    L. Eisenberg, T. H. Noe, Systemic risk in financial systems, Management Science 47 (2) (2001) 236--249

    2001

  17. [25]

    Elliott, B

    M. Elliott, B. Golub, M. O. Jackson, Financial networks and contagion, American Economic Review 104 (10) (2014) 3115--3153

    2014

  18. [26]

    Corsi, F

    F. Corsi, F. Lillo, D. Pirino, L. Trapin, Measuring the propagation of financial distress with Granger-causality tail risk networks, Journal of Financial Stability 38 (2018) 18--36

    2018

  19. [27]

    Forer, B

    P. Forer, B. Budnick, P. Vivo, S. Aufiero, S. Bartolucci, F. Caccioli, Financial instability transition under heterogeneous investments and portfolio diversification, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.19260 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  20. [28]

    V. V. Acharya, T. Yorulmazer, Too many to fail — an analysis of time-inconsistency in bank closure policies, Journal of Financial Intermediation 16 (1) (2007) 1--31

    2007

  21. [29]

    Allen, A

    F. Allen, A. Babus, E. Carletti, Asset commonality, debt maturity and systemic risk, Journal of Financial Economics 104 (3) (2012) 519--534

    2012

  22. [30]

    F. X. Diebold, K. Y lmaz, On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms, Journal of Econometrics 182 (1) (2014) 119--134

    2014

  23. [31]

    Bardoscia, G

    M. Bardoscia, G. Bianconi, G. Ferrara, Multiplex network analysis of the UK over-the-counter derivatives market, International Journal of Finance & Economics 24 (4) (2019) 1520--1544

    2019

  24. [32]

    Bargigli, G

    L. Bargigli, G. Tedeschi, Interaction in agent-based economics: A survey on the network approach, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 399 (2014) 1--15

    2014

  25. [33]

    Bardoscia, P

    M. Bardoscia, P. Barucca, S. Battiston, F. Caccioli, G. Cimini, D. Garlaschelli, F. Saracco, T. Squartini, G. Caldarelli, The physics of financial networks, Nature Reviews Physics 3 (7) (2021) 490--507

    2021

  26. [34]

    R. L. Axtell, J. D. Farmer, Agent-based modeling in economics and finance: Past, present, and future, Journal of Economic Literature 63 (1) (2025) 197--287

    2025

  27. [35]

    S. Thurner, Systemic financial risk: agent based models to understand the leverage cycle on national scales and its consequences https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=433fb0508b3a498bf875cb15a6f05cca7517a6a9, IfP/fgS Working Paper 14 (2011). ://citesee...

    2011

  28. [36]

    Samanidou, E

    E. Samanidou, E. Zschischang, D. Stauffer, T. Lux, Agent-based models of financial markets, Reports on Progress in Physics 70 (3) (2007) 409

    2007

  29. [37]

    ://www.bis.org/cpmi/glossary_030301.pdf

    Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, A glossary of terms used in payments and settlement systems https://www.bis.org/cpmi/glossary_030301.pdf (2003). ://www.bis.org/cpmi/glossary_030301.pdf

    2003

  30. [38]

    Almarzoqi, M

    R. Almarzoqi, M. S. B. Naceur, A. Scopelliti, How does bank competition affect solvency, liquidity and credit risk? Evidence from the MENA countries https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp15210.pdf, International Monetary Fund, (2015). ://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/w...

    2015

  31. [39]

    Bhattacharya, D

    S. Bhattacharya, D. Gale, W. Barnett, K. Singleton, Preference shocks, liquidity, and central bank policy, Liquidity and crises 35 (1) (1985) 69--88

    1985

  32. [40]

    Kelly, H

    B. Kelly, H. Jiang, Tail risk and asset prices, The Review of Financial Studies 27 (10) (2014) 2841--2871

    2014

  33. [41]

    Bhansali, Tail risk management, Journal of Portfolio Management 34 (4) (2008) 68

    V. Bhansali, Tail risk management, Journal of Portfolio Management 34 (4) (2008) 68

    2008

  34. [42]

    Thurner, J

    S. Thurner, J. D. Farmer, J. Geanakoplos, Leverage causes fat tails and clustered volatility, Quantitative Finance 12 (5) (2012) 695--707

    2012

  35. [43]

    McRandal, A

    R. McRandal, A. Rozanov, A primer on tail risk hedging, Journal of Securities Operations & Custody 5 (1) (2012) 29--36

    2012

  36. [44]

    B. S. Bernanke, M. Gertler, Agency costs, collateral, and business fluctuations http://www.nber.org/papers/w2015, Working Paper 2015, National Bureau of Economic Research (1986). https://doi.org/10.3386/w2015 doi:10.3386/w2015 . ://www.nber.org/papers/w2015

    1986 doi

  37. [45]

    Kiyotaki, J

    N. Kiyotaki, J. Moore, Credit cycles, Journal of Political Economy 105 (2) (1997) 211--248

    1997

  38. [46]

    Holmstrom, J

    B. Holmstrom, J. Tirole, Financial intermediation, loanable funds, and the real sector, Quarterly Journal of economics 112 (3) (1997) 663--691

    1997

  39. [47]

    Allen, D

    F. Allen, D. Gale, Bubbles and crises, The Economic Journal 110 (460) (2000) 236--255

    2000

  40. [48]

    Allen, E

    F. Allen, E. Carletti, Systemic risk from real estate and macro-prudential regulation, International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance 5 (1-2) (2013) 28--48

    2013

  41. [49]

    Adrian, H

    T. Adrian, H. S. Shin, Liquidity and leverage, Journal of Financial Intermediation 19 (3) (2010) 418--437

    2010

  42. [50]

    Caccioli, M

    F. Caccioli, M. Marsili, P. Vivo, Eroding market stability by proliferation of financial instruments, The European Physical Journal B 71 (4) (2009) 467--479

    2009

  43. [51]

    W. A. Brock, C. H. Hommes, F. O. Wagener, More hedging instruments may destabilize markets, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33 (11) (2009) 1912--1928

    2009

  44. [52]

    Amihud, H

    Y. Amihud, H. Mendelson, L. H. Pedersen, Market liquidity: asset pricing, risk, and crises, Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  45. [53]

    Allen, D

    F. Allen, D. Gale, Financial intermediaries and markets, Econometrica 72 (4) (2004) 1023--1061

    2004

  46. [54]

    Krishnamurthy, Amplification mechanisms in liquidity crises, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (3) (2010) 1--30

    A. Krishnamurthy, Amplification mechanisms in liquidity crises, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (3) (2010) 1--30

    2010

  47. [55]

    Bryant, A model of reserves, bank runs, and deposit insurance, Journal of Banking & Finance 4 (4) (1980) 335--344

    J. Bryant, A model of reserves, bank runs, and deposit insurance, Journal of Banking & Finance 4 (4) (1980) 335--344

    1980

  48. [56]

    D. W. Diamond, P. H. Dybvig, Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity, Journal of Political Economy 91 (3) (1983) 401--419

    1983

  49. [57]

    M. K. Brunnermeier, L. H. Pedersen, Market liquidity and funding liquidity, The Review of Financial Studies 22 (6) (2009) 2201--2238

    2009

  50. [58]

    V. V. Acharya, O. Merrouche, Precautionary hoarding of liquidity and interbank markets: Evidence from the subprime crisis, Review of Finance 17 (1) (2013) 107--160

    2013

  51. [59]

    V. V. Acharya, A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation, Journal of Financial Stability 5 (3) (2009) 224--255

    2009

  52. [60]

    V. V. Acharya, T. Yorulmazer, Information contagion and bank herding, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40 (1) (2008) 215--231

    2008

  53. [61]

    Tirole, Overcoming adverse selection: How public intervention can restore market functioning, American Economic Review 102 (1) (2012) 29--59

    J. Tirole, Overcoming adverse selection: How public intervention can restore market functioning, American Economic Review 102 (1) (2012) 29--59

    2012

  54. [62]

    Anginer, A

    D. Anginer, A. Demirguc-Kunt, M. Zhu, How does deposit insurance affect bank risk? Evidence from the recent crisis, Journal of Banking & Finance 48 (2014) 312--321

    2014

  55. [63]

    Cubillas, F

    E. Cubillas, F. Gonz \'a lez, Financial liberalization and bank risk-taking: International evidence, Journal of Financial Stability 11 (2014) 32--48

    2014

  56. [64]

    Chen, Banking panics: The role of the first-come, first-served rule and information externalities, Journal of Political Economy 107 (5) (1999) 946--968

    Y. Chen, Banking panics: The role of the first-come, first-served rule and information externalities, Journal of Political Economy 107 (5) (1999) 946--968

    1999

  57. [65]

    Dasgupta, Financial contagion through capital connections: A model of the origin and spread of bank panics, Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (6) (2004) 1049--1084

    A. Dasgupta, Financial contagion through capital connections: A model of the origin and spread of bank panics, Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (6) (2004) 1049--1084

    2004

  58. [66]

    Cespa, T

    G. Cespa, T. Foucault, Illiquidity contagion and liquidity crashes, The Review of Financial Studies 27 (6) (2014) 1615--1660

    2014

  59. [67]

    Farhi, J

    E. Farhi, J. Tirole, Collective moral hazard, maturity mismatch, and systemic bailouts, American Economic Review 102 (1) (2012) 60--93

    2012

  60. [68]

    Bardoscia, G

    M. Bardoscia, G. Ferrara, N. Vause, M. Yoganayagam, Full payment algorithm https://ssrn.com/abstract=3344580, Available at SSRN 3344580 (2019). ://ssrn.com/abstract=3344580

    2019

  61. [69]

    Freixas, B

    X. Freixas, B. M. Parigi, J.-C. Rochet, Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the Central Bank, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (2000) 611--638

    2000

  62. [70]

    P. Gai, S. Kapadia, Contagion in financial networks, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 466 (2120) (2010) 2401--2423

    2010

  63. [71]

    Acemoglu, A

    D. Acemoglu, A. Ozdaglar, A. Tahbaz-Salehi, Systemic risk and stability in financial networks, American Economic Review 105 (2) (2015) 564--608

    2015

  64. [72]

    Elliott, C.-P

    M. Elliott, C.-P. Georg, J. Hazell, Systemic risk shifting in financial networks, Journal of Economic Theory 191 (2021) 105157

    2021

  65. [73]

    Caccioli, M

    F. Caccioli, M. Shrestha, C. Moore, J. D. Farmer, Stability analysis of financial contagion due to overlapping portfolios, Journal of Banking & Finance 46 (2014) 233--245

    2014

  66. [74]

    Duarte, T

    F. Duarte, T. M. Eisenbach, Fire-sale spillovers and systemic risk, The Journal of Finance 76 (3) (2021) 1251--1294

    2021

  67. [75]

    R. Cont, E. Schaanning, Fire sales, indirect contagion and systemic stress testing https://ssrn.com/abstract=2541114, Tech. Rep. 02/2017, Norges Bank Working Paper (Jun 13 2017). ://ssrn.com/abstract=2541114

    2017

  68. [76]

    Barucca, T

    P. Barucca, T. Mahmood, L. Silvestri, Common asset holdings and systemic vulnerability across multiple types of financial institution, Journal of Financial Stability 52 (2021) 100810

    2021

  69. [77]

    Bouchaud, J

    J.-P. Bouchaud, J. D. Farmer, F. Lillo, How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand, in: Handbook of financial markets: dynamics and evolution, Elsevier, 2009, pp. 57--160

    2009

  70. [78]

    D. J. Watts, A simple model of global cascades on random networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 (9) (2002) 5766--5771

    2002

  71. [79]

    Capponi, M

    A. Capponi, M. Larsson, Price contagion through balance sheet linkages, The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 5 (2) (2015) 227--253

    2015

  72. [80]

    Greenwood, A

    R. Greenwood, A. Landier, D. Thesmar, Vulnerable banks, Journal of Financial Economics 115 (3) (2015) 471--485

    2015

  73. [81]

    Cifuentes, G

    R. Cifuentes, G. Ferrucci, H. S. Shin, Liquidity risk and contagion, Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (2-3) (2005) 556--566

    2005

  74. [82]

    Caccioli, J

    F. Caccioli, J. D. Farmer, N. Foti, D. Rockmore, Overlapping portfolios, contagion, and financial stability, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 51 (2015) 50--63

    2015

  75. [83]

    Poledna, S

    S. Poledna, S. Mart \' nez-Jaramillo, F. Caccioli, S. Thurner, Quantification of systemic risk from overlapping portfolios in the financial system, Journal of Financial Stability 52 (2021) 100808

    2021

  76. [84]

    Caccioli, G

    F. Caccioli, G. Ferrara, A. Ramadiah, Modelling fire sale contagion across banks and non-banks, Journal of Financial Stability 71 (2024) 101231

    2024

  77. [85]

    C. M. Reinhart, K. S. Rogoff, The aftermath of financial crises, American Economic Review 99 (2) (2009) 466--472

    2009

  78. [86]

    L. A. Bebchuk, I. Goldstein, Self-fulfilling credit market freezes, The Review of Financial Studies 24 (11) (2011) 3519--3555

    2011

  79. [87]

    M. O. Jackson, A. Pernoud, Credit freezes, equilibrium multiplicity, and optimal bailouts in financial networks, The Review of Financial Studies 37 (7) (2024) 2017--2062

    2024

  80. [88]

    Roukny, S

    T. Roukny, S. Battiston, J. E. Stiglitz, Interconnectedness as a source of uncertainty in systemic risk, Journal of Financial Stability 35 (2018) 93--106

    2018

  81. [89]

    Corsi, S

    F. Corsi, S. Marmi, F. Lillo, When micro prudence increases macro risk: The destabilizing effects of financial innovation, leverage, and diversification, Operations Research 64 (5) (2016) 1073--1088

    2016

  82. [90]

    R. M. May, S. A. Levin, G. Sugihara, Ecology for bankers, Nature 451 (7181) (2008) 893--894

    2008

  83. [91]

    Bormetti, L

    G. Bormetti, L. M. Calcagnile, M. Treccani, F. Corsi, S. Marmi, F. Lillo, Modelling systemic price cojumps with Hawkes factor models, Quantitative Finance 15 (7) (2015) 1137--1156

    2015

  84. [92]

    M. J. Flannery, Financial crises, payment system problems, and discount window lending, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28 (4) (1996) 804--824

    1996

  85. [93]

    V. V. Acharya, D. Gale, T. Yorulmazer, Rollover risk and market freezes, The Journal of Finance 66 (4) (2011) 1177--1209

    2011

  86. [94]

    R. J. Caballero, A. Simsek, Fire sales in a model of complexity, The Journal of Finance 68 (6) (2013) 2549--2587

    2013

  87. [95]

    Brunnermeier, G

    M. Brunnermeier, G. Gorton, A. Krishnamurthy, Liquidity mismatch measurement, in: Risk topography: Systemic risk and macro modeling, University of Chicago Press, 2013, pp. 99--112

    2013

  88. [96]

    Battiston, D

    S. Battiston, D. D. Gatti, M. Gallegati, B. Greenwald, J. E. Stiglitz, Default cascades: When does risk diversification increase stability?, Journal of Financial Stability 8 (3) (2012) 138--149

    2012

  89. [97]

    J. Cai, F. Eidam, A. Saunders, S. Steffen, Syndication, interconnectedness, and systemic risk, Journal of Financial Stability 34 (2018) 105--120

    2018

  90. [98]

    De Nicol \`o , M

    G. De Nicol \`o , M. Lucchetta, et al., Systemic risks and the macroeconomy https://ssrn.com/abstract=1555441, Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Massachusetts, US (2011). ://ssrn.com/abstract=1555441

    2011

  91. [99]

    Glasserman, H

    P. Glasserman, H. P. Young, How likely is contagion in financial networks?, Journal of Banking & Finance 50 (2015) 383--399

    2015

  92. [100]

    Arinaminpathy, S

    N. Arinaminpathy, S. Kapadia, R. M. May, Size and complexity in model financial systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (45) (2012) 18338--18343

    2012

  93. [101]

    Banulescu, E.-I

    G.-D. Banulescu, E.-I. Dumitrescu, Which are the SIFIs? A component expected shortfall approach to systemic risk, Journal of Banking & Finance 50 (2015) 575--588

    2015

  94. [102]

    G. G. Kaufman, Too big to fail in banking: What does it mean?, Journal of Financial Stability 13 (2014) 214--223

    2014

  95. [103]

    Upper, A

    C. Upper, A. Worms, Estimating bilateral exposures in the german interbank market: Is there a danger of contagion?, European Economic Review 48 (4) (2004) 827--849

    2004

  96. [104]

    Elsinger, A

    H. Elsinger, A. Lehar, M. Summer, Risk assessment for banking systems, Management Science 52 (9) (2006) 1301--1314

    2006

  97. [105]

    Drehmann, N

    M. Drehmann, N. A. Tarashev, Systemic importance: some simple indicators https://ssrn.com/abstract=1785264, BIS Quarterly Review, March (2011). ://ssrn.com/abstract=1785264

    2011

  98. [106]

    Iyer, J.-L

    R. Iyer, J.-L. Peydro, Interbank contagion at work: Evidence from a natural experiment, The Review of Financial Studies 24 (4) (2011) 1337--1377

    2011

  99. [107]

    o nig, K. M \

    R. Jamilov, T. K \"o nig, K. M \"u ller, F. Saidi, Two centuries of systemic bank runs https://ssrn.com/abstract=4924699, Tech. rep. ((2024)). ://ssrn.com/abstract=4924699

    2024

  100. [108]

    Amini, R

    H. Amini, R. Cont, A. Minca, Resilience to contagion in financial networks, Mathematical Finance 26 (2) (2016) 329--365

    2016

  101. [109]

    Bardoscia, S

    M. Bardoscia, S. Battiston, F. Caccioli, G. Caldarelli, Debtrank: A microscopic foundation for shock propagation, PloS one 10 (6) (2015) e0130406

    2015

  102. [110]

    Bardoscia, F

    M. Bardoscia, F. Caccioli, J. I. Perotti, G. Vivaldo, G. Caldarelli, Distress propagation in complex networks: the case of non-linear debtrank, PloS one 11 (10) (2016) e0163825

    2016

  103. [111]

    T. Fischer, No-arbitrage pricing under systemic risk: Accounting for cross-ownership, Mathematical Finance: An International Journal of Mathematics, Statistics and Financial Economics 24 (1) (2014) 97--124

    2014

  104. [112]

    Barucca, M

    P. Barucca, M. Bardoscia, F. Caccioli, M. D'Errico, G. Visentin, G. Caldarelli, S. Battiston, Network valuation in financial systems, Mathematical Finance 30 (4) (2020) 1181--1204

    2020

  105. [113]

    Soram \"a ki, M

    K. Soram \"a ki, M. L. Bech, J. Arnold, R. J. Glass, W. E. Beyeler, The topology of interbank payment flows, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 379 (1) (2007) 317--333

    2007

  106. [114]

    M. L. Bech, E. Atalay, The topology of the federal funds market, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 389 (22) (2010) 5223--5246

    2010

  107. [115]

    Craig, G

    B. Craig, G. Von Peter, Interbank tiering and money center banks, Journal of Financial Intermediation 23 (3) (2014) 322--347

    2014

  108. [116]

    Blasques, F

    F. Blasques, F. Br \"a uning, I. Van Lelyveld, A dynamic network model of the unsecured interbank lending market, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 90 (2018) 310--342

    2018

  109. [117]

    Glasserman, H

    P. Glasserman, H. P. Young, Contagion in financial networks, Journal of Economic Literature 54 (3) (2016) 779--831

    2016

  110. [118]

    A. M. Antonopoulos, O. Osuntokun, R. Pickhardt, Mastering the lightning network https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/mastering-the-lightning/9781492054856/, O'Reilly Media, Inc., (2021). ://www.oreilly.com/library/view/mastering-the-lightning/9781492054856/

    2021

  111. [119]

    Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, Bitcoin 4 (2) (2008) 15

    S. Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, Bitcoin 4 (2) (2008) 15. ://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

    2008

  112. [120]

    Makarov, A

    I. Makarov, A. Schoar, Cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (defi), Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2022 (1) (2022) 141--215

    2022

  113. [121]

    Buterin, et al., Ethereum white paper https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/, GitHub repository 1 (2013) 22--23

    V. Buterin, et al., Ethereum white paper https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/, GitHub repository 1 (2013) 22--23. ://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/

    2013

  114. [122]

    V. Buterin, Proof of stake: The making of Ethereum and the philosophy of blockchains https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=olbp100520, Seven Stories Press (2022). ://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=olbp100520

    2022

  115. [123]

    Singh, K

    A. Singh, K. Click, R. M. Parizi, Q. Zhang, A. Dehghantanha, K.-K. R. Choo, Sidechain technologies in blockchain networks: An examination and state-of-the-art review, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 149 (2020) 102471

    2020

  116. [124]

    Bartolucci, F

    S. Bartolucci, F. Caccioli, P. Vivo, A percolation model for the emergence of the Bitcoin lightning network, Scientific reports 10 (1) (2020) 4488

    2020

  117. [125]

    Bartolucci, A

    S. Bartolucci, A. Kirilenko, A model of the optimal selection of crypto assets, Royal Society Open Science 7 (8) (2020) 191863

    2020

  118. [126]

    Mungo, S

    L. Mungo, S. Bartolucci, L. Alessandretti, Cryptocurrency co-investment network: token returns reflect investment patterns, EPJ Data Science 13 (1) (2024) 11

    2024

  119. [127]

    ://www.binance.com/en/square/post/18496299612402

    Binance, Dex futures trading reaches \ 285b in 2024, hyperliquid dominates https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/18496299612402 (2025). ://www.binance.com/en/square/post/18496299612402

    2025

  120. [128]

    Sch \"a r, Decentralized finance: On blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets https://ssrn.com/abstract=3571335, FRB of St

    F. Sch \"a r, Decentralized finance: On blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets https://ssrn.com/abstract=3571335, FRB of St. Louis Review (2021). ://ssrn.com/abstract=3571335

    2021

  121. [129]

    Weing \"a rtner, F

    T. Weing \"a rtner, F. Fasser, P. Reis S \'a da Costa, W. Farkas, Deciphering defi: A comprehensive analysis and visualization of risks in decentralized finance, Journal of Risk and Financial Management 16 (10) (2023) 454

    2023

  122. [130]

    G. Ibba, S. Khullar, E. Tesfai, R. Neykova, S. Aufiero, M. Ortu, S. Bartolucci, G. Destefanis, A preliminary analysis of software metrics in decentralised applications, in: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Workshop on Blockchain-enabled Networked Sensor Systems, 2023...

    2023

  123. [131]

    Aufiero, G

    S. Aufiero, G. Ibba, S. Bartolucci, G. Destefanis, R. Neykova, M. Ortu, Dapps ecosystems: Mapping the network structure of smart contract interactions, EPJ Data Science 13 (1) (2024) 60

    2024

  124. [132]

    Caldarelli, Understanding the blockchain oracle problem: A call for action, Information 11 (11) (2020) 509

    G. Caldarelli, Understanding the blockchain oracle problem: A call for action, Information 11 (11) (2020) 509

    2020

  125. [133]

    Carter, L

    N. Carter, L. Jeng, Defi protocol risks: The paradox of defi https://ssrn.com/abstract=3866699, Regtech, suptech and beyond: innovation and technology in financial services 3 (2021). ://ssrn.com/abstract=3866699

    2021

  126. [134]

    ://www.forbes.com/digital-assets/categories/stablecoins/?sh=393f32ad1cd0

    Forbes , Stablecoins: What you need to know https://www.forbes.com/digital-assets/categories/stablecoins/?sh=393f32ad1cd0 (2024). ://www.forbes.com/digital-assets/categories/stablecoins/?sh=393f32ad1cd0

    2024

  127. [135]

    Aramonte, W

    S. Aramonte, W. Huang, A. Schrimpf, Defi risks and the decentralisation illusion, BIS Quarterly Review 6 (2021)

    2021

  128. [136]

    McLeay, A

    M. McLeay, A. Radia, R. Thomas, Money creation in the modern economy, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin (2014) Q1

    2014

  129. [137]

    ://go.chainalysis.com/2023-Crypto-Crime-Report.html

    Chainalysis, The 2023 crypto crime report https://go.chainalysis.com/2023-Crypto-Crime-Report.html (2023). ://go.chainalysis.com/2023-Crypto-Crime-Report.html

    2023

  130. [138]

    Mavis, Ronin validator security breach https://therecord.media/hackers-return-12-million-taken-from-ronin-network (2022)

    S. Mavis, Ronin validator security breach https://therecord.media/hackers-return-12-million-taken-from-ronin-network (2022). ://therecord.media/hackers-return-12-million-taken-from-ronin-network

    2022

  131. [139]

    ://www.certik.com/resources/blog/7fuXtbfo4CXEXcwy5Pqijp-hack3d-the-web3-security-quarterly-report-q2-2022

    CertiK, Web3 security quarterly report q2 2022 https://www.certik.com/resources/blog/7fuXtbfo4CXEXcwy5Pqijp-hack3d-the-web3-security-quarterly-report-q2-2022 (2022). ://www.certik.com/resources/blog/7fuXtbfo4CXEXcwy5Pqijp-hack3d-the-web3-security-quarterly-report-q2-2022

    2022

  132. [140]

    F. Bekemeier, Deceptive assurance? A conceptual view on systemic risk in decentralized finance (DeFi), in: Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications, 2021, pp. 76--87

    2021

  133. [141]

    Meyer, I

    E. Meyer, I. M. Welpe, P. G. Sandner, Decentralized finance - a systematic literature review and research directions https://ssrn.com/abstract=4016497, ECIS, (2022). ://ssrn.com/abstract=4016497

    2022

  134. [142]

    Werner, D

    S. Werner, D. Perez, L. Gudgeon, A. Klages-Mundt, D. Harz, W. Knottenbelt, Sok: Decentralized finance (DeFi), in: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, 2022, pp. 30--46

    2022

  135. [143]

    L. Zhou, X. Xiong, J. Ernstberger, S. Chaliasos, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, K. Qin, R. Wattenhofer, D. Song, A. Gervais, Sok: Decentralized finance (DeFi) attacks, in: 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), IEEE, 2023, pp. 2444--2461

    2023

  136. [144]

    W. Li, J. Bu, X. Li, H. Peng, Y. Niu, Y. Zhang, A survey of DeFi security: Challenges and opportunities, Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences 34 (10) (2022) 10378--10404

    2022

  137. [145]

    K. Qin, L. Zhou, B. Livshits, A. Gervais, Attacking the DeFi ecosystem with flash loans for fun and profit, in: International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Springer, 2021, pp. 3--32

    2021

  138. [146]

    Chang, J

    T. Chang, J. Ho, Z. Tirrell, G. Weng, J. You, A risk classification framework for decentralized finance protocols: Exploring emerging risks for insurers and reinsurers, Tech. rep., Society of Actuaries (2022)

    2022

  139. [147]

    S. Kaur, S. Singh, S. Gupta, S. Wats, Risk analysis in decentralized finance (DeFi): a fuzzy-AHP approach, Risk Management 25 (2) (2023) 13

    2023

  140. [148]

    Danielsson, M

    J. Danielsson, M. Fouche, R. Macrae, Cyber risk as systemic risk https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/cyber-risk-systemic-risk, VOX CEPR (2016). ://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/cyber-risk-systemic-risk

    2016

  141. [149]

    Barrera, S

    C. Barrera, S. Hurder, Blockchain upgrade as a coordination game https://ssrn.com/abstract=3192208, University of Cambridge (2018). ://ssrn.com/abstract=3192208

    2018

  142. [150]

    Tikhomirov, E

    S. Tikhomirov, E. Voskresenskaya, I. Ivanitskiy, R. Takhaviev, E. Marchenko, Y. Alexandrov, Smartcheck: Static analysis of ethereum smart contracts, in: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on emerging trends in software engineering for blockchain, 2018, pp. 9--16

    2018

  143. [151]

    Luu, D.-H

    L. Luu, D.-H. Chu, H. Olickel, P. Saxena, A. Hobor, Making smart contracts smarter, in: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, 2016, pp. 254--269

    2016

  144. [152]

    D. Ron, A. Shamir, Quantitative analysis of the full Bitcoin transaction graph, in: Financial Cryptography and Data Security: 17th International Conference, FC 2013, Okinawa, Japan, April 1-5, 2013, Revised Selected Papers 17, Springer, 2013, pp. 6--24

    2013

  145. [153]

    Destefanis, M

    G. Destefanis, M. Marchesi, M. Ortu, R. Tonelli, A. Bracciali, R. Hierons, Smart contracts vulnerabilities: a call for blockchain software engineering?, in: 2018 International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE), IEEE, 2018, pp. 19--25

    2018

  146. [154]

    G. Ibba, S. Aufiero, R. Neykova, S. Bartolucci, M. Ortu, R. Tonelli, G. Destefanis, A curated Solidity smart contracts repository of metrics and vulnerability, in: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering,...

    2024

  147. [155]

    ://cryptoslate.com/data-shows-how-aave-overtook-compound-in-defi-lending/

    CryptoSlate, Data shows how aave overtook compound in DeFi lending https://cryptoslate.com/data-shows-how-aave-overtook-compound-in-defi-lending/ (2021). ://cryptoslate.com/data-shows-how-aave-overtook-compound-in-defi-lending/

    2021

  148. [156]

    Saengchote, Where do DeFi stablecoins go? A closer look at what DeFi composability really means, PIER Discussion Papers , 156, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, 2021

    K. Saengchote, Where do DeFi stablecoins go? A closer look at what DeFi composability really means, PIER Discussion Papers , 156, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, 2021. URL: https://www.pier.or.th/files/dp/pier_dp_156.pdf

    2021

  149. [157]

    A. E. Gencer, S. Basu, I. Eyal, R. Van Renesse, E. G. Sirer, Decentralization in Bitcoin and Ethereum networks, in: Financial Cryptography and Data Security: 22nd International Conference, FC 2018, Nieuwpoort, Cura c ao, February 26--March 2, 2018, Revised Selected Papers 22, ...

    2018

  150. [158]

    Securities and Exchange Commission , https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/cybersecurity-enforcement-actions SEC enforcement actions against crypto and DeFi projects (2022)

    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission , https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/cybersecurity-enforcement-actions SEC enforcement actions against crypto and DeFi projects (2022). ://www.sec.gov/spotlight/cybersecurity-enforcement-actions

    2022

  151. [159]

    Gensler, https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/gensler-remarks-crypto-markets-040422 Remarks by chair Gary Gensler on crypto markets and DeFi , u.S

    G. Gensler, https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/gensler-remarks-crypto-markets-040422 Remarks by chair Gary Gensler on crypto markets and DeFi , u.S. SEC official speech (2021). ://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/gensler-remarks-crypto-markets-040422

    2021

  152. [160]

    ://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-europe-fit-for-the-digital-age/file-crypto-assets-1

    European Commission, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-europe-fit-for-the-digital-age/file-crypto-assets-1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on markets in crypto-assets ( MiCA ) , cOM(2020) 593 final, updated discuss...

    2020

  153. [161]

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ

  154. [162]

    ://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/guidelines/ps-g02-guidelines-on-provision-of-digital-payment-token-services-to-the-public

    Monetary Authority of Singapore, Guidelines on provision of digital payment token services to the public https://www.mas.gov.sg/regulation/guidelines/ps-g02-guidelines-on-provision-of-digital-payment-token-services-to-the-public, consultation Paper, 2022. ://www.mas.gov.sg/reg...

    2022

  155. [163]

    ://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/01/what-s-behind-china-s-cryptocurrency-ban/

    China bans crypto transactions and mining https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/01/what-s-behind-china-s-cryptocurrency-ban/, People’s Bank of China Announcement, 2021. ://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/01/what-s-behind-china-s-cryptocurrency-ban/

    2022

  156. [164]

    ://www.fsb.org/2022/02/assessment-of-risks-to-financial-stability-from-crypto-assets/

    Financial Stability Board (FSB) , Assessment of risks to financial stability from crypto-assets and DeFi https://www.fsb.org/2022/02/assessment-of-risks-to-financial-stability-from-crypto-assets/ (February 2022). ://www.fsb.org/2022/02/assessment-of-risks-to-financial-stabilit...

    2022

  157. [165]

    X. Li, P. Jiang, T. Chen, X. Luo, Q. Wen, A survey on the security of blockchain systems, Future generation computer systems 107 (2020) 841--853

    2020

  158. [166]

    Deshmukh, S

    S. Deshmukh, S. Warren, K. Warbach, Decentralized finance (DeFi) policy-maker toolkit, in: World economic forum, Vol. 8, 2021, p. 2021

    2021

  159. [167]

    Tasca, C

    P. Tasca, C. J. Tessone, A taxonomy of blockchain technologies: Principles of identification and classification, Ledger 4 (2019) 1--39

    2019

  160. [168]

    De Filippi, M

    P. De Filippi, M. Mannan, W. Reijers, Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance, Technology in Society 62 (2020) 101284

    2020

  161. [169]

    Vidal-Tom \'a s, A

    D. Vidal-Tom \'a s, A. Briola, T. Aste, FTX’s downfall and Binance’s consolidation: The fragility of centralised digital finance, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 625 (2023) 129044

    2023

  162. [170]

    Gudgeon, S

    L. Gudgeon, S. Werner, D. Perez, W. J. Knottenbelt, DeFi protocols for loanable funds: Interest rates, liquidity and market efficiency, in: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, 2020, pp. 92--112

    2020

  163. [171]

    Coinbase, What is impermanent loss? https://www.coinbase.com/en-gb/learn/crypto-glossary/what-is-impermanent-loss ://www.coinbase.com/en-gb/learn/crypto-glossary/what-is-impermanent-loss

  164. [172]

    Christidis, M

    K. Christidis, M. Devetsikiotis, Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things, IEEE Access 4 (2016) 2292--2303

    2016

  165. [173]

    S. K. Ezzat, Y. N. Saleh, A. A. Abdel-Hamid, Blockchain oracles: State-of-the-art and research directions, IEEE Access 10 (2022) 67551--67572

    2022

  166. [174]

    Zhang, X

    M. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Lin, Security of cross-chain bridges: Attack surfaces, defenses, and open problems, in: Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses, 2024, pp. 298--316

    2024

  167. [175]

    R. Auer, G. Cornelli, J. Frost, Rise of the central bank digital currencies: drivers, approaches and technologies, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP15363 (2020)

    2020

  168. [176]

    Q. DuPont, Experiments in algorithmic governance https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781315211909-8/experiments-algorithmic-governance-quinn-dupont, Bitcoin and beyond (2017) 157. ://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781315211909-8/experiments...

    2017 doi

  169. [177]

    Hinneh, Risk management in decentralised finance (DeFi), Academia (2024) 72

    A. Hinneh, Risk management in decentralised finance (DeFi), Academia (2024) 72

    2024

  170. [178]

    Bisias, M

    D. Bisias, M. Flood, A. W. Lo, S. Valavanis, A survey of systemic risk analytics, Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 4 (1) (2012) 255--296

    2012

  171. [179]

    ://www.lowenstein.com/news-insights/publications/client-alerts/silicon-valley-bank-a-timeline-and-summary-of-events-debt-finance

    Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Silicon valley bank: A timeline and summary of events https://www.lowenstein.com/news-insights/publications/client-alerts/silicon-valley-bank-a-timeline-and-summary-of-events-debt-finance ((2023)). ://www.lowenstein.com/news-insights/publications/client...

    2023

  172. [180]

    G. B. Gorton, J. Y. Zhang, Taming wildcat stablecoins, U. Chi. L. Rev. 90 (2023) 909

    2023

  173. [181]

    Network, The celsius crash explained https://blog.pontem.network/the-celsius-crash-explained-be91ef715cd9 (2022)

    P. Network, The celsius crash explained https://blog.pontem.network/the-celsius-crash-explained-be91ef715cd9 (2022). ://blog.pontem.network/the-celsius-crash-explained-be91ef715cd9

    2022

  174. [182]

    Briola, S

    A. Briola, S. Bartolucci, T. Aste, Deep limit order book forecasting: a microstructural guide, Quantitative Finance (2025) 1--31

    2025

  175. [183]

    A. Park, The conceptual flaws of constant product automated market making https://kenaninstitute.unc.edu/rethinc/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Park_-Andreas-Automated-Market-Makers.pdf, Available at SSRN 3805750 (2021). ://kenaninstitute.unc.edu/rethinc/wp-content/uploads/2022/03...

    2021

  176. [184]

    Cai, Was there front running during the LTCM crisis? https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/ifdp/was-there-front-running-during-the-ltcm-crisis.htm, Available at SSRN 385560 (2003)

    F. Cai, Was there front running during the LTCM crisis? https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/ifdp/was-there-front-running-during-the-ltcm-crisis.htm, Available at SSRN 385560 (2003). ://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/ifdp/was-there-front-running-during-the-ltcm-crisis.htm

    2003

  177. [185]

    Malinova, A

    K. Malinova, A. Park, Learning from DeFi: Would automated market makers improve equity trading? https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/conference/2023/FinTech/6_1030am_Saleh_slidestrueAMM_Discussion.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=B6D9682B78CDCAA6031EC9EA983A8146, Availabl...

    2024

  178. [186]

    J. Xu, B. Livshits, The anatomy of a cryptocurrency Pump-and-Dump scheme, in: 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19), 2019, pp. 1609--1625

    2019

  179. [187]

    ://aave.com/docs/concepts/flash-loans

    Aave, Flash loans documentation https://aave.com/docs/concepts/flash-loans. ://aave.com/docs/concepts/flash-loans

  180. [188]

    Y. Cao, C. Zou, X. Cheng, Flashot: a snapshot of flash loan attack on DeFi ecosystem, arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.00626 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  181. [189]

    J. Crawley, https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2021/05/20/flash-loan-attack-causes-defi-token-bunny-to-crash-over-95/ Flash loan attack causes DeFi token bunny to crash over 95\ ://www.coindesk.com/markets/2021/05/20/flash-loan-attack-causes-defi-token-bunny-to-crash-over-95/

    2021

  182. [190]

    ://www.reuters.com/business/finance/bitcoin-buyer-microstrategy-jumps-nasdaq-100-entry-2024-12-16/

    Reuters, Bitcoin buyer MicroStrategy jumps on Nasdaq 100 entry https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/bitcoin-buyer-microstrategy-jumps-nasdaq-100-entry-2024-12-16/ ((2024)). ://www.reuters.com/business/finance/bitcoin-buyer-microstrategy-jumps-nasdaq-100-entry-2024-12-16/

    2024

  183. [191]

    Aufiero, A

    S. Aufiero, A. Briola, T. Salarin, F. Caccioli, S. Bartolucci, T. Aste, Cryptocurrencies in the balance sheet: Insights from (micro) strategy--bitcoin interactions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14655 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  184. [192]

    ://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-11-14/ftx-s-balance-sheet-was-bad

    Bloomberg Opinion, FTX’s balance sheet was bad https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-11-14/ftx-s-balance-sheet-was-bad ((2022)). ://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-11-14/ftx-s-balance-sheet-was-bad

    2022

  185. [193]

    Borio, On money, debt, trust, and central banking, Cato J

    C. Borio, On money, debt, trust, and central banking, Cato J. 39 (2019) 267

    2019

  186. [194]

    J. Ponciano, Crypto flash crash wipes out \ 400 billion in market value on bitcoin day as El Salvador’s president ‘buys the dip’ https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanponciano/2021/09/07/crypto-flash-crash-wipes-out-400-billion-in-market-value-on-el-salvadors-bitcoin-day/, Forb...

    2021

  187. [195]

    rep., Bank for International Settlements (June 2021)

    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision , Prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d519.pdf, Tech. rep., Bank for International Settlements (June 2021). ://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d519.pdf

    2021

  188. [196]

    ://www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-crypto-market-is-not-immune-to-contagion-risk

    Nasdaq, The crypto market is not immune to contagion risk https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-crypto-market-is-not-immune-to-contagion-risk (2022). ://www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-crypto-market-is-not-immune-to-contagion-risk

    2022

  189. [197]

    ://oig.federalreserve.gov/reports/board-review-silvergate-summary-sep2023.pdf

    Federal Reserve Office of Inspector General, Review of the board’s supervision of silvergate bank https://oig.federalreserve.gov/reports/board-review-silvergate-summary-sep2023.pdf (September 2023). ://oig.federalreserve.gov/reports/board-review-silvergate-summary-sep2023.pdf

    2023

  190. [198]

    ://www.statista.com/statistics/270126/largest-stock-exchange-operators-by-market-capitalization-of-listed-companies/

    Statista, Largest stock exchange operators worldwide as of september 2024, by market capitalization of listed companies https://www.statista.com/statistics/270126/largest-stock-exchange-operators-by-market-capitalization-of-listed-companies/. ://www.statista.com/statistics/270...

    2024

  191. [199]

    T. E. Times, Crypto market capitalisation hits record \ 3.2 trillion https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/cryptocurrency/crypto-market-capitalisation-hits-record-3-2-trillion/articleshow/115286813.cms?from=mdr. ://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/cryptocurrency/cry...

  192. [200]

    T. Iyer, Cryptic connections: spillovers between crypto and equity markets https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/global-financial-stability-notes/Issues/2022/01/10/Cryptic-Connections-511776, International Monetary Fund, 2022. ://www.imf.org/en/Publications/global-financial-stab...

    2022

  193. [201]

    W. Xie, G. Cao, Dynamic spillover effects between cryptocurrencies and China's financial markets: New evidence from a Tvp-Var extended joint connectedness approach https://ssrn.com/abstract=4769838, Available at SSRN 4769838 (2024). ://ssrn.com/abstract=4769838

    2024

  194. [202]

    Zhang, E

    Y.-J. Zhang, E. Bouri, R. Gupta, S.-J. Ma, Risk spillover between Bitcoin and conventional financial markets: An expectile-based approach, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 55 (2021) 101296

    2021

  195. [203]

    P. Wang, X. Liu, S. Wu, Dynamic linkage between Bitcoin and traditional financial assets: A comparative analysis of different time frequencies, Entropy 24 (11) (2022) 1565

    2022

  196. [204]

    Scagliarini, G

    T. Scagliarini, G. Pappalardo, A. E. Biondo, A. Pluchino, A. Rapisarda, S. Stramaglia, Pairwise and high-order dependencies in the cryptocurrency trading network, Scientific Reports 12 (1) (2022) 18483

    2022

  197. [205]

    A. M. Fund, https://www.amf.org.ae/sites/default/files/publications/2022-03/Understanding https://www.amf.org.ae/sites/default/files/publications/2022-03/Understanding

    2022

  198. [206]

    Pi \ n eiro-Chousa, M

    J. Pi \ n eiro-Chousa, M. \'A . L \'o pez-Cabarcos, A. Sevic, I. Gonz \'a lez-L \'o pez, A preliminary assessment of the performance of DeFi cryptocurrencies in relation to other financial assets, volatility, and user-generated content, Technological Forecasting and Social Cha...

    2022

  199. [207]

    Ugolini, J

    A. Ugolini, J. C. Reboredo, W. Mensi, Connectedness between DeFi, cryptocurrency, stock, and safe-haven assets, Finance Research Letters 53 (2023) 103692

    2023

  200. [208]

    Pacelli, C

    V. Pacelli, C. Di Tommaso, M. Foglia, S. Ingannamorte, Cryptocurrencies and systemic risk. the spillover effects between cryptocurrency and financial markets, in: Systemic Risk and Complex Networks in Modern Financial Systems, Springer Nature Switzerland Cham, 2024, pp. 343--358

    2024

  201. [209]

    F. Zhou, Cryptocurrency: A new player or a new crisis in financial markets? -- evolutionary analysis of association and risk spillover based on network science, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 648 (2024) 129955

    2024

  202. [210]

    ://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/financial-stability-publications/fsr/special/html/ecb.fsrart202205_02 1cc6b111b4.en.html

    European Central Bank, Decrypting financial stability risks in crypto-asset markets https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/financial-stability-publications/fsr/special/html/ecb.fsrart202205_02 1cc6b111b4.en.html (2022). ://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/financial-stability-publications/fsr/...

    2022

  203. [211]

    ://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/central-bank-digital-currency-momentum-growing-study-shows-2024-09-17/

    Reuters, Central bank digital currency momentum growing, study shows https://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/central-bank-digital-currency-momentum-growing-study-shows-2024-09-17/ (2024). ://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/central-bank-digital-currency-momentum-growing-s...

    2024

  204. [212]

    ://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/

    Atlantic Council, Central bank digital currency (CBDC) tracker https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/. ://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/

  205. [213]

    ://kr-asia.com/china-explores-cross-border-uses-for-digital-yuan-in-new-trial

    KrAsia, China explores cross-border uses for digital yuan in new trial https://kr-asia.com/china-explores-cross-border-uses-for-digital-yuan-in-new-trial (2024). ://kr-asia.com/china-explores-cross-border-uses-for-digital-yuan-in-new-trial

    2024

  206. [214]

    ://www.fnlondon.com/articles/bank-of-england-eyes-cbdc-for-banks-5a993b2d

    Financial News London, Bank of England eyes CBDC for banks https://www.fnlondon.com/articles/bank-of-england-eyes-cbdc-for-banks-5a993b2d (2024). ://www.fnlondon.com/articles/bank-of-england-eyes-cbdc-for-banks-5a993b2d

    2024

  207. [215]

    ://www.ft.com/content/e50d0d40-a670-4ee7-b734-5f0ee3375aeb

    Financial Times, Even central banks are losing faith in CBDCs https://www.ft.com/content/e50d0d40-a670-4ee7-b734-5f0ee3375aeb (2024). ://www.ft.com/content/e50d0d40-a670-4ee7-b734-5f0ee3375aeb

    2024

  208. [216]

    Frolov, M

    S. Frolov, M. Ivasenko, M. Dykha, I. Shalyhina, V. Hrabar, V. Fenyves, Interaction between decentralized financial services and the traditional banking system: A comparative analysis, Banks and Bank Systems 19 (2) (2024) 53--74

    2024

  209. [217]

    P. D. Azar, et al., Digital assets: Risk and regulation https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/2024/EPR_2024_digital-assets_azar.pdf, Economic policy review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York ((2024)). ://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/20...

    2024

  210. [218]

    Bindseil, J

    U. Bindseil, J. Schaaf, The distributional consequences of Bitcoin https://ssrn.com/abstract=4985877, Available at SSRN (2024). ://ssrn.com/abstract=4985877

    2024

  211. [219]

    ://www.ft.com/content/af23fffc-e560-42eb-84a0-f25ca8d693c0

    Financial Times, Crypto industry dreams of a golden era under Trump https://www.ft.com/content/af23fffc-e560-42eb-84a0-f25ca8d693c0 (2025). ://www.ft.com/content/af23fffc-e560-42eb-84a0-f25ca8d693c0

    2025

  212. [220]

    M. S. Rizwan, G. Ahmad, D. Ashraf, Systemic risk: The impact of Covid-19, Finance Research Letters 36 (2020) 101682

    2020

  213. [221]

    Y. Duan, S. El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, H. Li, X. Li, Bank systemic risk around Covid-19: A cross-country analysis, Journal of Banking & Finance 133 (2021) 106299

    2021

  214. [222]

    Y. Lai, Y. Hu, A study of systemic risk of global stock markets under Covid-19 based on complex financial networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 566 (2021) 125613

    2021

  215. [223]

    Caferra, D

    R. Caferra, D. Vidal-Tom \'a s, Who raised from the abyss? A comparison between cryptocurrency and stock market dynamics during the Covid-19 pandemic, Finance Research Letters 43 (2021) 101954

    2021

  216. [224]

    Corbet, C

    S. Corbet, C. Larkin, B. Lucey, The contagion effects of the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies, Finance Research Letters 35 (2020) 101554

    2020

  217. [225]

    Z. Umar, M. Gubareva, A time--frequency analysis of the impact of the Covid-19 induced panic on the volatility of currency and cryptocurrency markets, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 28 (2020) 100404

    2020

  218. [226]

    Z. Umar, F. Jare \ n o, M. de la O Gonz \'a lez, The impact of Covid-19-related media coverage on the return and volatility connectedness of cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172 (2021) 121025

    2021

  219. [227]

    Yousaf, F

    I. Yousaf, F. Jare \ n o, M. Tolentino, Connectedness between DeFi assets and equity markets during Covid-19: A sector analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 187 (2023) 122174

    2023

  220. [228]

    Akhtaruzzaman, S

    M. Akhtaruzzaman, S. Boubaker, D. K. Nguyen, M. R. Rahman, Systemic risk-sharing framework of cryptocurrencies in the Covid--19 crisis, Finance Research Letters 47 (2022) 102787

    2022

  221. [229]

    A. H. Elsayed, G. Gozgor, C. K. M. Lau, Risk transmissions between Bitcoin and traditional financial assets during the Covid-19 era: The role of global uncertainties, International Review of Financial Analysis 81 (2022) 102069

    2022

  222. [230]

    Yousaf, R

    I. Yousaf, R. Nekhili, M. Gubareva, Linkages between defi assets and conventional currencies: Evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic, International Review of Financial Analysis 81 (2022) 102082

    2022

  223. [231]

    ://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-21/sec-launches-crypto-task-force-led-by-crypto-mom-hester-peirce

    Bloomberg News, Sec launches crypto task force led by `crypto mom' Hester Peirce https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-21/sec-launches-crypto-task-force-led-by-crypto-mom-hester-peirce (2025). ://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-21/sec-launches-crypto-task-for...

    2025

  224. [232]

    ://www.hsbc.com/news-and-views/news/media-releases/2023/hsbc-acquires-silicon-valley-bank-uk-limited

    HSBC, Hsbc acquires Silicon Valley bank UK limited https://www.hsbc.com/news-and-views/news/media-releases/2023/hsbc-acquires-silicon-valley-bank-uk-limited (2023). ://www.hsbc.com/news-and-views/news/media-releases/2023/hsbc-acquires-silicon-valley-bank-uk-limited

    2023

  225. [233]

    Dowd, et al., The experience of free banking https://www.jstor.org/stable/1060588, Routledge London, 1992

    K. Dowd, et al., The experience of free banking https://www.jstor.org/stable/1060588, Routledge London, 1992. ://www.jstor.org/stable/1060588

    1992

  226. [234]

    G. A. Selgin, L. H. White, The evolution of a free banking system, Economic Inquiry 25 (3) (1987) 439--457

    1987

  227. [235]

    Eichengreen, From commodity to fiat and now to crypto: what does history tell us? https://www.nber.org/papers/w25426, Tech

    B. Eichengreen, From commodity to fiat and now to crypto: what does history tell us? https://www.nber.org/papers/w25426, Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research (2019). ://www.nber.org/papers/w25426

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.