Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explainability for Vision Foundation Models: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.12203 v1 pith:BQIV6GER submitted 2025-01-21 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords modelsfoundationexplainabilitysurveycomplexitydomainexplainablefield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly integrated into daily life, the field of explainability has gained significant attention. This trend is particularly driven by the complexity of modern AI models and their decision-making processes. The advent of foundation models, characterized by their extensive generalization capabilities and emergent uses, has further complicated this landscape. Foundation models occupy an ambiguous position in the explainability domain: their complexity makes them inherently challenging to interpret, yet they are increasingly leveraged as tools to construct explainable models. In this survey, we explore the intersection of foundation models and eXplainable AI (XAI) in the vision domain. We begin by compiling a comprehensive corpus of papers that bridge these fields. Next, we categorize these works based on their architectural characteristics. We then discuss the challenges faced by current research in integrating XAI within foundation models. Furthermore, we review common evaluation methodologies for these combined approaches. Finally, we present key observations and insights from our survey, offering directions for future research in this rapidly evolving field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Concept-Based Mechanistic Interpretability Using Structured Knowledge Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    BAGEL trains per-layer logistic-regression probes on CLIP-defined concepts and compares per-class concept probabilities with dataset-level concept frequencies, visualizing the alignment in a knowledge graph.

Pith tools