pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22427 · v1 · pith:BRRMXT6Snew · submitted 2026-06-21 · ✦ hep-ph · physics.app-ph· physics.plasm-ph

Analytical calculation of the spectrum of nonlinear Compton scattering beyond local approximations

M. P. Malakhov , Th. Benahmed , E. G. Gelfer , A. M. Fedotov , O. Klimo , S. Weber , S. G. Rykovanov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 10:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph physics.app-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords nonlinear Compton scatteringstrong-field QEDfinite pulsephase integralsuniform approximationsaddle-point methodharmonic spectrum
0
0 comments X

The pith

Compact analytical formulae are derived for the nonlinear Compton scattering spectrum in finite plane-wave pulses with smooth envelopes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives compact analytical expressions for the spectrum of nonlinear Compton scattering from an electron in a finite laser pulse. The strong-field probability is expressed as phase integrals over the pulse, which are then evaluated using asymptotic methods for multicycle pulses. A uniform approximation eliminates divergences at the edges of the broadened harmonics, while an envelope-corrected saddle-point method refines the behavior near the linear edge. This keeps the interference substructure within harmonics and recovers the locally monochromatic approximation when averaging over the pulse. Readers would care because the formulas enable direct evaluation of spectra from electron beams without requiring full numerical integration of the QED expressions.

Core claim

We derive compact analytical formulae for the spectrum of nonlinear Compton scattering in a finite plane-wave pulse with a smooth temporal envelope. The strong-field QED probability is reduced to finite-pulse phase integrals, which are evaluated asymptotically for multicycle pulses with a broad class of smooth envelopes. We use the uniform approximation to remove the caustic divergences that appear at the nonlinear edges of broadened harmonics. Away from the caustics, it reduces to the standard saddle-point result. The behavior near the linear edge is further improved by an envelope-corrected saddle-point approximation. The approach retains the harmonic substructure in the spectral-angular r

What carries the argument

Finite-pulse phase integrals evaluated asymptotically via the uniform approximation to handle caustics and envelope-corrected saddle-point method.

If this is right

  • The resulting formulae agree with direct numerical calculations within their asymptotic domain.
  • The harmonic substructure is retained in the dominant part of the emitted radiation.
  • The locally monochromatic approximation is recovered by averaging the finite-pulse interference.
  • Spectra from an electron beam can be evaluated analytically using these expressions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may apply to other strong-field QED processes involving finite pulses with similar envelopes.
  • Testable by comparing the analytical spectra to numerical results for pulses with different smooth envelopes.
  • Could simplify calculations in experiments where electron beams collide with intense laser pulses.

Load-bearing premise

The pulse is multicycle with a smooth temporal envelope from the broad class where the uniform approximation and envelope-corrected saddle-point method are valid.

What would settle it

A direct numerical evaluation of the phase integrals or spectrum for a multicycle smooth pulse that shows significant deviation from the analytical formulae outside the caustics would falsify the asymptotic expressions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22427 by A. M. Fedotov, E. G. Gelfer, M. P. Malakhov, O. Klimo, S. G. Rykovanov, S. Weber, Th. Benahmed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the edge problem in the finite-pulse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Backscattering spectra for circular polarization with a Gaussian envelope (left panel) and a hyperbolic-secant envelope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Backscattering spectra for linear polarization with a Gaussian envelope. The left and right panels correspond to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Backscattering spectra for a Gaussian envelope. The green and blue curves correspond to circular and linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Asymptotic parameter ∆ϕβ in the frequency–angle plane for a0 = 1 and γ = 1000. The gray lines indicate the boundaries of the first ten harmonic bands. sampling fluctuations small on the scale shown in the figure. The three panels correspond to relative energy spreads δγ = 0.1%, 1%, and 10%. The first two val￾ues are motivated by the parameters of modern high￾quality electron beams. Percent-level energy spr… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Backscattering spectra for circular polarization for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectra for linear polarization at different observation angles. The blue and red dashed curves show the corrected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relative error between the corrected SPA and nu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Incoherent backscattering spectra from an electron beam for a linearly polarized Gaussian pulse with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Saddle point ϕ0 in the vicinity of s ≈ ℓ for a Gaussian pulse. The solid blue and green curves show the real and imaginary parts obtained numerically with full inclusion of the envelope. The gray and orange curves correspond to the analytical solution neglecting envelope effects. The dashed red and yellow curves represent the approximate analytical solution including the envelope correction. Table II. Env… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We derive compact analytical formulae for the spectrum of nonlinear Compton scattering in a finite plane-wave pulse with a smooth temporal envelope. The strong-field QED probability is reduced to finite-pulse phase integrals, which are evaluated asymptotically for multicycle pulses with a broad class of smooth envelopes. We use the uniform approximation to remove the caustic divergences that appear at the nonlinear edges of broadened harmonics. Away from the caustics, it reduces to the standard saddle-point result. The behavior near the linear edge is further improved by an envelope-corrected saddle-point approximation. The approach retains the harmonic substructure in the spectral-angular region carrying the dominant part of the emitted radiation. The locally monochromatic approximation is recovered by averaging the finite-pulse interference. Within their asymptotic domain of applicability, the resulting formulae agree with direct numerical calculations and can be used to evaluate spectra from an electron beam.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives compact analytical formulae for the spectrum of nonlinear Compton scattering in a finite plane-wave pulse with a smooth temporal envelope. The strong-field QED probability is reduced to finite-pulse phase integrals that are evaluated asymptotically for multicycle pulses using the uniform approximation to remove caustic divergences at the nonlinear edges of broadened harmonics; away from caustics the result reduces to an envelope-corrected saddle-point approximation. The expressions retain harmonic substructure, recover the locally monochromatic limit upon averaging the finite-pulse interference, and are stated to agree with direct numerical calculations inside the asymptotic domain of multicycle pulses with smooth envelopes.

Significance. If the central derivations and numerical agreement hold, the work supplies practical analytical tools that capture finite-pulse effects and harmonic structure beyond the locally monochromatic approximation, which is valuable for interpreting strong-field QED experiments and for rapid evaluation of spectra from electron beams.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction should state the precise class of envelopes for which the uniform and envelope-corrected saddle-point methods remain valid, including any explicit conditions on the number of cycles or smoothness parameters.
  2. Explicit error estimates or bounds on the neglected higher-order terms in the asymptotic expansion would strengthen the claim of agreement with numerical calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments appear in the report, so we have no points requiring point-by-point rebuttal or revision at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from standard QED

full rationale

The paper reduces the standard strong-field QED probability to finite-pulse phase integrals and evaluates them asymptotically using the uniform approximation and envelope-corrected saddle-point methods for multicycle pulses with smooth envelopes. These steps rely on established mathematical techniques applied to the phase integrals, with no reduction to fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The claim of agreement with direct numerical calculations supplies an independent external check within the stated domain. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the inputs; the central analytical formulae retain independent content from the asymptotic evaluation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard saddle-point and uniform asymptotic methods applied to phase integrals under the domain assumption of multicycle smooth pulses; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond conventional strong-field QED are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The laser pulse is multicycle with a smooth temporal envelope belonging to a broad class amenable to asymptotic evaluation
    Invoked when reducing the probability to phase integrals and applying the uniform and saddle-point approximations.
  • standard math Standard saddle-point and uniform asymptotic techniques from mathematical physics apply to the finite-pulse phase integrals
    Used to evaluate the integrals and remove caustic divergences.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5710 in / 1411 out tokens · 36858 ms · 2026-06-26T10:23:16.871609+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (33) The locally reduced phase integrals are then   A0 A± A2   ≈∆ϕ +∞X ℓ=1 (−1)ℓD(ℓ) 1 eiℓφ0 ×   g−1 0 Jℓ(g0) −e∓iφ0 Jℓ∓1 g0 Jℓ + cos 2ξ 2 e−2iφ0 Jℓ−2 +e i2φ0 Jℓ+2  

    = +∞X n=−∞ (−1)ne−2inφ0 Jℓ−2n(¯αg0)J n ¯βg2 0 . (33) The locally reduced phase integrals are then   A0 A± A2   ≈∆ϕ +∞X ℓ=1 (−1)ℓD(ℓ) 1 eiℓφ0 ×   g−1 0 Jℓ(g0) −e∓iφ0 Jℓ∓1 g0 Jℓ + cos 2ξ 2 e−2iφ0 Jℓ−2 +e i2φ0 Jℓ+2   . (34) VI. CONNECTION WITH THE LMA The LMA [58, 62] is obtained from the local Bessel representation by replacing the remaining fin...

    2025

  2. [2]

    The corrected phase then satisfies qN(−ϕ∗

  3. [3]

    =q ∗ N(ϕ0)andq (2) N (−ϕ∗

  4. [4]

    = (q (2) N (ϕ0))∗. There- fore the two saddle contributions combine into a real os- cillatory expression, D(ℓ) N,lin = s 8π ∆ϕ|q (2) N (ϕ0)| |Σ|e ∆ϕReq N(ϕ0) ×cos [∆ϕImq N(ϕ0) + arg(h0Σ)],(D8) with h0 = s − 2 q(2) N (ϕ0) .(D9) Away from the linear edge, the envelope-induced term in qN becomes a small correction, and the result reduces to the ordinary two-...

  5. [5]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Physics Reports1010, 1 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Di Piazza, C

    A. Di Piazza, C. Müller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 1177 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Gonoskov, T

    A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Reviews of Modern Physics94, 045001 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    W. P. Leemans, R. W. Schoenlein, P. Volfbeyn, A. H. Chin, T. E. Glover, P. Balling, M. Zolotorev, K. J. Kim, S. Chattopadhyay, and C. V. Shank, Physical review let- ters77, 4182 (1996)

    1996

  9. [9]

    Albert, S

    F. Albert, S. G. Anderson, D. J. Gibson, C. A. Hagmann, M.S.Johnson, M.Messerly, V.Semenov, M.Y.Shverdin, B. Rusnak, A. M. Tremaine,et al., Physical Review Spe- cial Topics—Accelerators and Beams13, 070704 (2010)

    2010

  10. [10]

    S. G. Rykovanov, C. G. R. Geddes, J. L. Vay, C. B. Schroeder, E. Esarey, and W. P. Leemans, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics47, 234013 (2014)

    2014

  11. [11]

    Khrennikov, J

    K. Khrennikov, J. Wenz, A. Buck, J. Xu, M. Heigoldt, L. Veisz, and S. Karsch, Physical review letters114, 195003 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    W. S. Graves, J. Bessuille, P. Brown, S. Carbajo, V. Dolgashev, K.-H. Hong, E. Ihloff, B. Khaykovich, H. Lin, K. Murari,et al., Physical Review Special Topics- Accelerators and Beams17, 120701 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    K. J. Weeks, V. N. Litvinenko, and J. M. J. Madey, Med- ical physics24, 417 (1997)

    1997

  14. [14]

    Tashima and T

    H. Tashima and T. Yamaya, Radiological Physics and Technology15, 187 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Toyokawa, H

    H. Toyokawa, H. Ohgaki, T. Mikado, and K. Yamada, Review of scientific instruments73, 3358 (2002)

    2002

  16. [16]

    Tommasini, S

    R. Tommasini, S. P. Hatchett, D. S. Hey, C. Iglesias, N. Izumi, J. A. Koch, O. L. Landen, A. J. MacKinnon, C. Sorce, J. A. Delettrez,et al., Physics of Plasmas18, 056309 (2011)

    2011

  17. [17]

    Kulpe, M

    S. Kulpe, M. Dierolf, B. Günther, J. Brantl, M. Busse, K. Achterhold, F. Pfeiffer, and D. Pfeiffer, Physica Med- ica79, 137 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    V. G. Nedorezov, A. A. Turinge, and Y. M. Shatunov, Physics-Uspekhi47, 341 (2004)

    2004

  19. [19]

    Gales, D

    S. Gales, D. L. Balabanski, F. Negoita, O. Tesileanu, C. A. Ur, D. Ursescu, and N. V. Zamfir, Physica Scripta 91, 093004 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Tesileanu, C

    D.L.Balabanski, R.Popescu, D.Stutman, K.A.Tanaka, O. Tesileanu, C. A. Ur, D. Ursescu, and N. V. Zamfir, Europhysics Letters117, 28001 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    V. G. Nedorezov, S. G. Rykovanov, and A. B. Savel’ev, Physics-Uspekhi64, 1214 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    E. S. Sarachik and G. T. Schappert, Physical Review D 1, 2738 (1970)

    1970

  23. [23]

    Esarey, S

    E. Esarey, S. K. Ride, and P. Sprangle, Physical Review E48, 3003 (1993)

    1993

  24. [24]

    S. V. Popruzhenko and A. M. Fedotov, Uspekhi Fizich- eskikh Nauk193, 491 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    C. Bula, K. T. McDonald, E. J. Prebys, C. Bamber, S. Boege, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melissinos, D. D. Mey- erhofer, W. Ragg, D. L. Burke,et al., Physical Review Letters76, 3116 (1996)

    1996

  26. [26]

    T. G. Blackburn, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics4, 5 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    Burke, R

    D. Burke, R. Field, G. Horton-Smith, J. Spencer, D. Walz, S. Berridge, W. Bugg, K. Shmakov, A. Weide- mann, C. Bula,et al., Physical Review Letters79, 1626 (1997)

    1997

  28. [28]

    Bamber, S

    C. Bamber, S. J. Boege, T. Koffas, T. Kotseroglou, A. C. Melissinos, D. D. Meyerhofer, D. A. Reis, W. Ragg, C. Bula, K. T. McDonald,et al., Physical Review D60, 092004 (1999)

    1999

  29. [29]

    A. I. Nikishov and V. I. Ritus, JETP19, 529 (1964)

    1964

  30. [30]

    V. I. Ritus, J. Sov. Laser Res.6, 10.1007/BF01120220 (1985)

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01120220 1985

  31. [31]

    W. H. Furry, Physical Review81, 115 (1951)

    1951

  32. [32]

    V. B. Berestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii,Quantum Electrodynamics, Course of Theo- retical Physics, Vol. 4 (Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 1982)

    1982

  33. [33]

    Mirzaie, C

    M. Mirzaie, C. I. Hojbota, D. Y. Kim, V. B. Pathak, T. G. Pak, C. M. Kim, H. W. Lee, J. W. Yoon, S. K. Lee, Y. J. Rhee,et al., Nature Photonics18, 1212 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Har-Shemesh and A

    O. Har-Shemesh and A. Di Piazza, Optics Letters37, 1352 (2012)

    2012

  35. [35]

    Blackburn, E

    T. Blackburn, E. Gerstmayr, S. Mangles, and M. Mark- lund, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams23, 064001 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    C. He, A. Longman, J. Pérez-Hernández, M. De Marco, C.Salgado, G.Zeraouli, G.Gatti, L.Roso, R.Fedosejevs, and W. Hill III, Optics Express27, 30020 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    F. V. Hartemann and A. K. Kerman, Physical review letters76, 624 (1996)

    1996

  38. [38]

    Y. Y. Lau, F. He, D. P. Umstadter, and R. Kowalczyk, Physics of Plasmas10, 2155 (2003)

    2003

  39. [39]

    G. A. Krafft, Physical review letters92, 204802 (2004)

    2004

  40. [40]

    C. A. Brau, Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators and Beams7, 020701 (2004)

    2004

  41. [41]

    Boca and V

    M. Boca and V. Florescu, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics80, 053403 (2009)

    2009

  42. [42]

    Mackenroth and A

    F. Mackenroth and A. Di Piazza, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics83, 032106 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    Seipt and B

    D. Seipt and B. Kämpfer, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics83, 022101 (2011)

    2011

  44. [44]

    Krajewska and J

    K. Krajewska and J. Z. Kamiński, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics85, 062102 (2012)

    2012

  45. [45]

    Seipt and B

    D. Seipt and B. Kämpfer, Laser Physics23, 075301 (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    Ghebregziabher, B

    I. Ghebregziabher, B. A. Shadwick, and D. Um- stadter, Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams16, 030705 (2013)

    2013

  47. [47]

    Maroli, V

    C. Maroli, V. Petrillo, I. Drebot, L. Serafini, B. Terzić, and G. A. Krafft, Journal of Applied Physics124, 063105 (2018)

    2018

  48. [48]

    Seipt, V

    D. Seipt, V. Y. Kharin, and S. G. Rykovanov, Physical review letters122, 204802 (2019)

    2019

  49. [49]

    Timoshenko, M

    A. Timoshenko, M. Malakhov, A. Fedotov, and S. Ryko- vanov, Physical Review A112, L061501 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    M. A. Valialshchikov, V. Y. Kharin, and S. G. Ryko- vanov, Physical Review Letters126, 194801 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    Seipt, V

    D. Seipt, V. Kharin, S. Rykovanov, A. Surzhykov, and S. Fritzsche, Journal of Plasma Physics82, 655820203 (2016). 19

    2016

  52. [52]

    M. P. Malakhov and A. M. Fedotov, Bulletin of the Lebe- dev Physics Institute52, S291 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    A. G. R. Thomas, Physical Review Special Topics – Ac- celerators and Beams13, 020702 (2010)

    2010

  54. [54]

    V. Y. Kharin, D. Seipt, and S. G. Rykovanov, Physical Review A93, 063801 (2016)

    2016

  55. [55]

    Di Piazza, M

    A. Di Piazza, M. Tamburini, S. Meuren, and C. H. Keitel, Physical Review A98, 012134 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    Ilderton, B

    A. Ilderton, B. King, and D. Seipt, Physical Review A 99, 042121 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    E. G. Gelfer, A. M. Fedotov, A. A. Mironov, and S. We- ber, Physical Review D106, 056013 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    Gonoskov, S

    A. Gonoskov, S. Bastrakov, E. Efimenko, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, I. Meyerov, A. Muraviev, A. Sergeev, I. Surmin, and E. Wallin, Physical Review E92, 023305 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    Di Piazza, M

    A. Di Piazza, M. Tamburini, S. Meuren, and C. H. Keitel, Physical Review A99, 022125 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    V. Dinu, C. Harvey, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, and G. Torgrimsson, Physical Review Letters116, 044801 (2016)

    2016

  61. [61]

    C. N. Harvey, A. Ilderton, and B. King, Physical Review A91, 013822 (2015)

    2015

  62. [62]

    Heinzl, B

    T. Heinzl, B. King, and A. J. MacLeod, Physical Review A102, 063110 (2020)

    2020

  63. [63]

    T. G. Blackburn, A. J. MacLeod, and B. King, New Jour- nal of Physics23, 085008 (2021)

    2021

  64. [64]

    C. F. Nielsen, R. Holtzapple, and B. King, Physical Re- view D106, 013010 (2022)

    2022

  65. [65]

    T. G. Blackburn, B. King, and S. Tang, Physics of Plas- mas30, 093903 (2023)

    2023

  66. [66]

    Larin and D

    N. Larin and D. Seipt, Physical Review A112, 032819 (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    N. B. Narozhnyi and M. S. Fofanov, Journal of Experi- mental and Theoretical Physics83, 14 (1996)

    1996

  68. [68]

    V. Y. Kharin, D. Seipt, and S. G. Rykovanov, Physical review letters120, 044802 (2018)

    2018

  69. [69]

    Seipt and B

    D. Seipt and B. Kämpfer, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics88, 012127 (2013)

    2013

  70. [70]

    D. M. Volkov, Z. Phys.94, 250 (1935)

    1935

  71. [71]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathe- matical Functions(Dover, New York, 1964)

    1964

  72. [72]

    M. V. Fedoryuk,Saddle-Point Method(Nauka, Moscow,

  73. [73]

    (in Russian);Asymptotics: Integrals and Series (Nauka, Moscow, 1987) (in Russian)

    1987

  74. [74]

    Chester, B

    C. Chester, B. Friedman, and F. Ursell, inMathemati- cal Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 53 (Cambridge University Press, 1957) pp. 599–611

    1957

  75. [75]

    L. B. Felsen and N. Marcuvitz,Radiation and Scattering of Waves, IEEE Press Series on Electromagnetic Wave Theory (Wiley-IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1994) p. 924

    1994

  76. [76]

    D. B. Milošević, Physical Review A111, 053105 (2025)

    2025

  77. [77]

    S. M. Wiggins, R. C. Issac, G. H. Welsh,et al., Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion52, 124032 (2010)

    2010

  78. [78]

    Winkler, M

    P. Winkler, M. Trunk, L. Hübner, A. Martinez de la Ossa, S. Jalas, M. Kirchen, I. Agapov, S. A. An- tipov, R. Brinkmann, T. Eichner, A. Ferran Pousa, T. Hülsenbusch, G. Palmer, M. Schnepp, K. Schubert, M. Thévenet, P. A. Walker, C. Werle, W. P. Leemans, and A. R. Maier, Nature640, 907 (2025)

    2025