Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 6 cited by

Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Review maps where Neuro-Symbolic AI work is concentrated and where it is missing.

desk verdict Useful map of neuro-symbolic AI with a sensible taxonomy, but the distributional claims are not robust because the code-availability filter is applied unevenly, and the 5% meta-cognition figure is partly an artifact. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05435 v2 pith:BS7NNZNR submitted 2025-01-09 cs.AI

Brandon C. Colelough , William Regli This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AI
keywords Neuro-SymbolicAIsystematicreviewPRISMAmeta-cognitionexplainabilityknowledgerepresentationlearningandinferencelogicreasoning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review aims to map the post-2020 boom in Neuro-Symbolic AI by systematically collecting and classifying research into five areas: knowledge representation, learning and inference, explainability and trustworthiness, logic and reasoning, and meta-cognition. After screening 1,428 candidate papers down to 158 studied in detail, the authors report that most work sits in learning and inference (63 percent), knowledge representation (44 percent), and logic and reasoning (35 percent), while explainability and trustworthiness gets less attention (28 percent) and meta-cognition almost none (5 percent). The central claim is that this distribution reveals a real gap: a field that pairs neural learning with symbolic reasoning has not yet built the self-monitoring and trust-building mechanisms needed for reliable, adaptable deployment. A sympathetic reader would care because the paper turns a scattered literature into a quantitative map of where effort is going and where interdisciplinary openings are being left open.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a five-category taxonomy of Neuro-Symbolic AI, synthesized from six surveys and four books, used in a PRISMA-style literature screening pipeline. The taxonomy defines knowledge representation, learning and inference, explainability and trustworthiness, logic and reasoning, and a newly proposed meta-cognition category, and the pipeline counts how many of the 158 included papers fall into each category and each pairwise intersection. That counting is what carries the argument: the reported percentages and the claim of underrepresentation are direct outputs of applying the taxonomy to the screened corpus.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to repeat the identical search and screening on the same five databases and keyword combinations, but include the 225 papers excluded for lacking a public codebase, and compare the category percentages to the reported 63, 44, 35, 28, and 5 percent. If meta-cognition or explainability percentages change materially once the code filter is removed, the claimed gap is an artifact of the filter rather than a property of the literature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Neuro-Symbolic AI research from 2020 to 2024 is unevenly distributed across five foundational areas, with learning and inference (63 percent), knowledge representation (44 percent), and logic and reasoning (35 percent) dominating, while explainability and trustworthiness (28 percent) and especially meta-cognition (5 percent) are underrepresented. The authors further claim that the few intersection points, such as the single system, AlphaGeometry, that touches all four main areas, show how rare broad integration is, and that the near absence of work combining explainability with the other areas signals a concrete opportunity for interdisciplinary research. They also offer a definition of meta-cognition within Neuro-Symbolic AI as the system's capacity to monitor, evaluate, and adjust its own reasoning and learning processes, and argue that this missing layer is what would let future systems act with the lazy-when-possible, focused-when-required character of human cognition.

Load-bearing premise

The reported percentages and gap analysis depend on the assumption that the PRISMA-style search, the five self-defined categories, and the filter requiring a public codebase produced a representative sample of the Neuro-Symbolic AI literature, an assumption the paper does not validate with a flow diagram, inter-rater reliability checks, or a test of whether the code filter distorts the category counts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the distributional map is right, funding and research effort in Neuro-Symbolic AI will likely keep flowing into learning, inference, and knowledge representation while explainability remains a secondary concern.
  • The low 5 percent figure for meta-cognition implies that self-monitoring and self-regulating architectures are a nearly open frontier, with room for new frameworks rather than incremental improvements.
  • The sparse intersections involving explainability and trustworthiness suggest that adding explanation mechanisms to existing neuro-symbolic systems is a low-competition, high-need direction, especially for real-world deployment.
  • If meta-cognition is genuinely absent, a field aiming at reliable autonomy cannot get there by scaling up current learning and reasoning work alone; a separate control layer will be needed.
  • The single project sitting at the intersection of all four main areas, AlphaGeometry, indicates that cross-area integration is possible but currently exceptional rather than routine.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension would be to run the same five-category taxonomy on the full 1,428-document pool without the code-availability filter to see whether the 5 percent meta-cognition figure is an artifact of the filter, since the review itself waived that filter for meta-cognition.
  • A neighboring question the paper leaves implicit is whether the code-availability criterion is a proxy for a younger, more systems-oriented slice of the field; that would change how the percentages should be read as evidence about the whole research community.
  • The taxonomy's meta-cognition category could be operationalized by checking whether specific mechanisms, such as reward-model self-critique, reflection loops, or architecture-level monitors, appear in the literature, which would give a more direct measure than keyword counting.
  • If the gap is real, a practical consequence is that benchmark suites for neuro-symbolic systems should include meta-cognitive tasks, such as detecting and correcting one's own reasoning errors, to measure progress in the area the review identifies as most neglected.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a PRISMA-based systematic review of Neuro-Symbolic AI between 2020 and 2024. The authors define a five-area taxonomy (Knowledge Representation, Learning and Inference, Explainability and Trustworthiness, Logic and Reasoning, and Meta-Cognition), screen an initial pool of 1,428 papers down to 158 (or 167, inconsistently reported) included papers, and report the distribution of research across the five areas. They find concentration in Learning and Inference (63%), Knowledge Representation (44%), and Logic and Reasoning (35%), with less work in Explainability and Trustworthiness (28%) and very little in Meta-Cognition (5%). The paper concludes that Meta-Cognition is an underrepresented area and recommends interdisciplinary research to address the gaps.

Significance. If the distributional counts were reliable, this review would be a useful quantitative map of Neuro-Symbolic AI research activity and a clear case for increased attention to Meta-Cognition. The paper also provides a substantial annotated bibliography with links to many repositories, which is a valuable community resource. However, the central quantitative claims are currently undermined by inconsistencies in the sample definition and by an inclusion criterion applied unevenly across categories, so the review's main contribution is not yet established. The paper does offer one genuinely useful contribution: a concrete, well-scoped definition of Meta-Cognition for Neuro-Symbolic AI, along with an explicit summary of open questions in that area.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3] The number of included papers is internally inconsistent: the Abstract reports 167 papers meeting inclusion criteria, while Section 3 states that after full-text review a further 9 papers were removed, leaving 158 included papers. All reported percentages are computed with denominator 158 (e.g., 70/158 = 44%, 99/158 = 63%), so the abstract should state 158. This is not a cosmetic discrepancy: the entire distributional summary is keyed to a sample size that is never reported consistently.
  2. [Section 2.3 and Section 3] The public-codebase inclusion criterion is applied unevenly. Section 2.3 states that 225 of 392 candidates were excluded because no public codebase could be found, 'except for entries on Meta-Cognition as no code-bases could be found' for that category. Consequently, all 8 Meta-Cognition papers were admitted without the code requirement, while all other categories were subject to it. If the code filter is a quality or reproducibility gate, Meta-Cognition should be held to the same standard (which would reduce its count to 0, not 8); if it is not a meaningful filter, then excluding 58% of candidates on this basis is unjustified and may differentially remove work in areas such as Explainability and Trustworthiness that often does not ship code. Either way, the reported 5% figure is not comparable with the other category percentages, and the gap claim is an artifact of the inclusion rule.
  3. [Section 2.3] The paper claims to follow PRISMA but does not supply a PRISMA flow diagram, the exact search strings used for the five databases, or the detailed screening protocol (title/abstract inclusion rules, deduplication method, and the criteria used to judge 'relevance'). Without these, the candidate set of 392 papers is not reproducible, and the distributional percentages cannot be verified or compared with other systematic reviews. The authors should add the full search strategy and a PRISMA-style flow diagram as supplementary material.
  4. [References and Section 3] The code-availability claims are not supported by the reference list. Many entries do not link to the cited paper's implementation; examples include [32] (URL points to 'symbolic-execution-papers'), [47] (URL points to a chat transcript), [70] and [81] (URLs point to unrelated paper lists), [87] (URL points to 'Autonomous-Agents'), and [96]–[97] (URLs point to general LLM paper collections). If these URLs were used to satisfy the 'public codebase' inclusion criterion, the screening is not credible; if they were not used, the paper should state the actual repository for each included paper.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Keywords] The keyword list contains a doubled comma in 'Logic and Reasoning,,'; the typo should be corrected.
  2. [Table 1] The table header uses 'Ar𝜒iV' instead of 'arXiv', and the row labeled 'Total (after screening)' appears to contain raw per-database search counts rather than screened totals; relabeling would avoid confusion.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The caption uses 'Meta-Level Cognition' while the text and taxonomy use 'Meta-Cognition'; the terminology should be unified.
  4. [Section 3] The percentage breakdown after deduplication is internally inconsistent: 45% (n=641) duplicates, 28% (n=395) removed at title/abstract, and 28% (n=392) held cannot all be correct percentages of the same total of 1,428, since 395 and 392 are different numbers that round to the same reported 28%.
  5. [Section 4.2] The phrase 'to improve machine generalization' is awkwardly written as 'the improve machine generalization'; this should be corrected for readability.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The 5% Meta-Cognition figure is partly manufactured by the authors' own definition of the category and by an explicit waiver of the code-availability filter for exactly that category; the other distributional claims are ordinary sample counts.

  1. self definitional [Section 2.1, 'Taxonomy of Neuro-Symbolic AI']
    "Additionally, we define Meta-Cognition to address a gap in current taxonomies that fail to capture fields encompassing self-awareness, adaptive learning, reflective reasoning, self-regulation, and introspective monitoring."

    The category Meta-Cognition is introduced on the explicit premise that existing taxonomies have a gap, and the Results then report that Meta-Cognition is the least explored area (5%, n=8). Because the category was authored by the reviewers to fill a perceived gap and the search and coding scheme were built around their own five categories, the 'gap' finding partly restates the definitional premise rather than being an independent measurement of the literature. This is not fully forced because a large number of papers could in principle have been found under the new category, so this step is only partially circular.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3, Results, screening paragraph; see also Figure 2 caption]
    "58% (n = 225) were further excluded from this literature review as a public code-base could not be found for the associated piece of literature (except for entries on Meta-Cognition as no code-bases could be found for literature associated with this category)."

    The reported 5% (n=8) Meta-Cognition figure is produced by an explicit exception to the code-availability inclusion criterion. The paper itself states that no codebases could be found for Meta-Cognition entries, so if the same criterion used for every other category had been applied, the Meta-Cognition count would be 0 instead of 8. The reported percentage is therefore not a comparable estimate of the literature but an output of the unevenly applied selection rule; the gap is partly manufactured by the rule that lets exactly these papers into the sample. The qualitative claim that Meta-Cognition is the least explored area would survive even at 0%, so this is partial circularity affecting the reported statistic rather than the entire conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central distributional claim (63% learning and inference, 44% knowledge representation, 35% logic and reasoning, 28% explainability and trustworthiness, 5% Meta-Cognition) is a sample-descriptive result, not a derivation from theory. Most of those percentages are ordinary counts from the 158-paper sample and are not circular in themselves. The circularity is concentrated in the Meta-Cognition finding: the category is defined by the authors as filling a gap in existing taxonomies, and the 5% figure is then generated under an explicit waiver of the code-availability filter for exactly that category, with the paper admitting no codebases could be found. Under the same inclusion rule applied to all categories, the count would be 0. This is a specific, quotable reduction of the headline gap statistic to the authors' definitional and filtering choices. There is no self-citation chain, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no renaming of a known result; the other percentages have independent content and are externally plausible. The paper also has internal inconsistencies (167 vs. 158 included papers) and lacks a PRISMA flow diagram, but those are correctness and reporting concerns rather than circularity. Overall, the Meta-Cognition gap is partially circular, while the rest of the review's distributional reporting is not.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The review's claims rest on the authors' taxonomy and screening choices. The key axioms are the completeness of the five-area taxonomy, the representativeness of the codebase filter, and the adequacy of the keyword searches. The Meta-Cognition category is an invented conceptual entity with no external validation.

assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The five-area taxonomy (Knowledge Representation, Learning and Inference, Explainability and Trustworthiness, Logic and Reasoning, Meta-Cognition) is a complete and appropriate decomposition of Neuro-Symbolic AI research.
    Defined by the authors from six surveys and four books; completeness is assumed without external validation.
  • domain assumption Requiring a public codebase as an inclusion criterion selects high-quality, reproducible research and does not bias the sample.
    Used in Section 3; no evidence that code-free research (e.g., theoretical or position papers) is not an important part of the field, and the criterion is relaxed for Meta-Cognition.
  • domain assumption The keyword searches ('neurosymbolic' AND each area term) capture the relevant 2020-2024 literature.
    Search details are not provided; the category distributions are direct outputs of these queries.
invented entities (1)
  • Meta-Cognition as a fifth research area in Neuro-Symbolic AI
    purpose: To categorize literature addressing self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and self-regulation in hybrid AI systems, and to identify a research gap.
    The definition is introduced by the authors; no external benchmark or falsifiable prediction is attached to it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BS7NNZNR

@misc{pith2026250105435,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BS7NNZNR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05435}
}
read the original abstract

Background: The field of Artificial Intelligence has undergone cyclical periods of growth and decline, known as AI summers and winters. Currently, we are in the third AI summer, characterized by significant advancements and commercialization, particularly in the integration of Symbolic AI and Sub-Symbolic AI, leading to the emergence of Neuro-Symbolic AI. Methods: The review followed the PRISMA methodology, utilizing databases such as IEEE Explore, Google Scholar, arXiv, ACM, and SpringerLink. The inclusion criteria targeted peer-reviewed papers published between 2020 and 2024. Papers were screened for relevance to Neuro-Symbolic AI, with further inclusion based on the availability of associated codebases to ensure reproducibility. Results: From an initial pool of 1,428 papers, 167 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. The majority of research efforts are concentrated in the areas of learning and inference (63%), logic and reasoning (35%), and knowledge representation (44%). Explainability and trustworthiness are less represented (28%), with Meta-Cognition being the least explored area (5%). The review identifies significant interdisciplinary opportunities, particularly in integrating explainability and trustworthiness with other research areas. Conclusion: Neuro-Symbolic AI research has seen rapid growth since 2020, with concentrated efforts in learning and inference. Significant gaps remain in explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition. Addressing these gaps through interdisciplinary research will be crucial for advancing the field towards more intelligent, reliable, and context-aware AI systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05435 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Histogram of publications per year for Neuro-Symbolic AI. The data was obtained through Google Scholar scraping, reflecting significant growth from 2020 abstract screening with 28% (n = 392) held for further analysis. From the remaining 392 papers, the literature was further split based on code/model availability. 42% of the papers (n = 167) had associated code-base repositories (e.g. GitHub, Huggingface etc.) and 5… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A literature review of existing of the major components of Symbolic AI was conducted. Note that papers from the Meta-Level Cognition were not required to have an associated public code￾base/repository 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 16 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. SGA: Plug&Play Geometric Verification for Educational Video Synthesis

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An intercept-and-refine agent that symbolically checks Manim animation code for geometric collisions improves the authors' rendering-free MVQS layout score in 7 of 8 LLM×pipeline configurations, with the metric unvali...

  2. Evolution, Future of AI, and Singularity

    cs.OH 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper translates principles from evolutionary developmental biology into a new AI design paradigm that promises continual learning, structured representations, and a grounded path to technological singularity.

  3. Evolutionary Developmental Biology Can Serve as the Conceptual Foundation for a New Design Paradigm in Artificial Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes regulatory connections, weak linkage, and component-level variation-selection, drawn from evo-devo, as the unifying conceptual foundation for a new AI design paradigm.

  4. HyDRA: A Hybrid-Driven Reasoning Architecture for Verifiable Knowledge Graphs

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HyDRA, a contract-driven LLM pipeline for building ontologies and knowledge graphs, scored 42-62% accuracy on MedExQA biomedical QA while an ontology-free baseline scored 95-98%.

  5. On the Parallels Between Evolutionary Theory and the State of AI

    q-bio.NC 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors propose that evolutionary developmental biology's principles, such as encapsulation, regulatory control, and local variation-selection, can overcome continual learning and explainability limits of current ...

  6. The Rise of Small Language Models in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A comprehensive survey of small language models in healthcare, with a taxonomy of building, adapting, and compressing them for clinical NLP tasks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [32]

    S.-W. Lin, P. Tolmach, Y. Liu, Y. Li, Solsee: a source-level symbolic execution engine for solidity, in: Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2022, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2022, pp. 1687–1691. URL: https://github.com/XMU...

    arXiv 2022

  2. [47]

    Prentzas, I

    J. Prentzas, I. Hatzilygeroudis, Exploring aspects regarding reasoning in neuro-symbolic rules and connectionist expert systems, in: 2021 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), 2021, pp. 1–8. URL: https://github.com/MoserMichael/my-notes/blob/master/talking-with-chatgtp-b.md. doi: 10.1109/IISA52424. 2021.9555527

    arXiv 2021

  3. [70]

    Sanders, N

    K. Sanders, N. Weir, B. V. Durme, Tv-trees: Multimodal entailment trees for neuro-symbolic video reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.19467 (2024). URL: https://github.com/Xuchen-Li/cv-arxiv-daily. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.585, submitted 10 March, 2024; v1 submitted 29 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024

    arXiv 2024

  4. [81]

    Kodnongbua, L

    M. Kodnongbua, L. H. Curtis, A. Schulz, Zero-shot sequential neuro-symbolic reasoning for automatically gener- ating architecture schematic designs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00052 (2024). URL: https://github.com/Yangyi-Chen/ Multimodal-AND-Large-Language-Models. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-39179-8 , submitted 25 January, 2024; originally 14 Brandon C. Colelou...

    arXiv 2024

  5. [87]

    Gomaa, M

    A. Gomaa, M. Feld, Towards adaptive user-centered neuro-symbolic learning for multimodal interaction with autonomous systems, in: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ICMI ’23, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023, pp. 689–694. URL: https://github.com/tmgthb/Autonomous-Agents. doi:10.1145/3577...

    arXiv 2023

  6. [96]

    J. R. Kirk, R. E. Wray, J. E. Laird, Exploiting language models as a source of knowledge for cognitive agents, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 286–294. URL: https://github.com/zjunlp/Prompt4ReasoningPapers. doi:10.1609/ aaaiss.v2i1.27690

    2024

  7. [97]

    Knowles, M

    K. Knowles, M. Witbrock, G. Dobbie, V. Yogarajan, A proposal for a language model based cognitive architecture, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 295–301. URL: https://github.com/Aryia-Behroziuan/References. doi:10.1609/ aaaiss.v2i1.27691

    2024

  8. [1]

    H. A. Kautz, The third ai summer: Aaai robert s. engelmore memorial lecture, AI Magazine 43 (2022) 105–125. doi: 10. 1002/aaai.12036

    2022

Show all 180 references
  1. [2]

    Dingli, Neuro-symbolic ai, 2023

    A. Dingli, Neuro-symbolic ai, 2023. Includes bibliographical references and index

    2023

  2. [3]

    LeCun, A path towards autonomous machine intelligence, OpenReview Archive (2022)

    Y. LeCun, A path towards autonomous machine intelligence, OpenReview Archive (2022). URL: https://openreview.net/ forum?id=BZ5a1r-kVsf, direct Upload

    2022

  3. [4]

    Marcus, Rebooting ai, 2019

    G. Marcus, Rebooting ai, 2019

    2019

  4. [5]

    Winograd, Procedures as a Representation for Data in a Computer Program for Understanding Natural Language, AI Technical Report AITR-235, 1971

    T. Winograd, Procedures as a Representation for Data in a Computer Program for Understanding Natural Language, AI Technical Report AITR-235, 1971. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7095, accessed: 2024-05-13

    1971

  5. [6]

    Weizenbaum, Eliza—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine, Communications of the ACM 9 (1966) 36–45

    J. Weizenbaum, Eliza—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine, Communications of the ACM 9 (1966) 36–45. doi:10.1145/365153.365168

    1966

  6. [7]

    R. K. Lindsay, B. G. Buchanan, E. A. Feigenbaum, J. Lederberg, Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Organic Chemistry: The DENDRAL Project, McGraw-Hill, 1980

    1980

  7. [8]

    van Melle, Mycin: a knowledge-based consultation program for infectious disease diagnosis, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 10 (1978) 313–322

    W. van Melle, Mycin: a knowledge-based consultation program for infectious disease diagnosis, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 10 (1978) 313–322. doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(78)80049-2

    1978 doi

  8. [9]

    Speer, J

    R. Speer, J. Chin, C. Havasi, Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge (2016). doi: 10.48550/ ARXIV.1612.03975

    2016 doi arXiv

  9. [10]

    Lenat, G

    D. Lenat, G. Marcus, Getting from generative ai to trustworthy ai: What llms might learn from cyc, 2023. doi:10.48550/ ARXIV.2308.04445

    2023 doi arXiv

  10. [11]

    Edelkamp, M

    S. Edelkamp, M. Helmert, R. Reffel, J. Bossek, International planning competition, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 2004, pp. 81–84

    2004

  11. [12]

    Rosenblatt, The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain., Psychological Review 65 (1958) 386–408

    F. Rosenblatt, The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain., Psychological Review 65 (1958) 386–408. doi:10.1037/h0042519

    1958 doi

  12. [13]

    J. J. Hopfield, Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 79 (1982) 2554–2558. doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554

    1982 doi

  13. [14]

    D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, R. J. Williams, Learning representations by back-propagating errors, Nature 323 (1986) 533–536. doi:10.1038/323533a0

    1986 doi

  14. [15]

    Vaswani, N

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, L. Kaiser, I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need,

  15. [16]

    Redmon, S

    J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, A. Farhadi, You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection, 2015. doi: 10.48550/ ARXIV.1506.02640

    2015 doi arXiv

  16. [17]

    Ramesh, M

    A. Ramesh, M. Pavlov, G. Goh, S. Gray, C. Voss, A. Radford, M. Chen, I. Sutskever, Zero-shot text-to-image generation, 2021. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2102.12092. 11 Brandon C. Colelough et al. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1–19

    2021 doi arXiv

  17. [18]

    A. d. Garcez, L. C. Lamb, Neurosymbolic ai: the 3rd wave, Artificial Intelligence Review 56 (2023) 12387–12406. doi: 10. 1007/s10462-023-10448-w

    2023

  18. [19]

    Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011

    D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011

    2011

  19. [20]

    Gibaut, L

    W. Gibaut, L. Pereira, F. Grassiotto, A. Osorio, E. Gadioli, A. Munoz, S. Gomes, C. d. Santos, Neurosymbolic ai and its taxonomy: a survey (2023). doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2305.08876

    2023 doi arXiv

  20. [21]

    D. Yu, B. Yang, D. Liu, H. Wang, S. Pan, A survey on neural-symbolic learning systems, 2021. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2111. 08164

    2021 doi

  21. [22]

    Wan, C.-K

    Z. Wan, C.-K. Liu, H. Yang, C. Li, H. You, Y. Fu, C. Wan, T. Krishna, Y. Lin, A. Raychowdhury, Towards cognitive ai systems: a survey and prospective on neuro-symbolic ai, 2024. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2401.01040

    2024 doi arXiv

  22. [23]

    Marra, S

    G. Marra, S. Dumančić, R. Manhaeve, L. De Raedt, From statistical relational to neurosymbolic artificial intelligence: A survey, Artificial Intelligence 328 (2024) 104062. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2023.104062

    2024

  23. [24]

    Michel-Deletie, M

    C. Michel-Deletie, M. K. Sarker, Neuro-symbolic methods for trustworthy ai: a systematic review, Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence (2024). Tracking #: 726-1708, Review Assignment Stage

    2024

  24. [25]

    Bouneffouf, C

    D. Bouneffouf, C. C. Aggarwal, Survey on applications of neurosymbolic artificial intelligence, 2022. doi:10.48550/ARXIV. 2209.12618

    2022 doi arXiv

  25. [26]

    Hitzler, M

    P. Hitzler, M. K. Sarker, A. Eberhart (Eds.), Compendium of Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence, volume 369 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA369. doi:10.3233/FAIA369

    2023 doi

  26. [27]

    Hitzler, M

    P. Hitzler, M. K. Sarker, Neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence: The state of the art, in: Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence,

  27. [28]

    Shakarian, C

    P. Shakarian, C. Baral, G. I. Simari, B. Xi, L. Pokala, Neuro Symbolic Reasoning and Learning, SpringerBriefs in Computer Science, Springer, 2023

    2023

  28. [29]

    T. H. Trinh, Y. Wu, Q. V. Le, H. He, T. Luong, Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations, Nature 625 (2024) 476–482. URL: https://github.com/google-deepmind/alphageometry. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06747-5

    2024 doi

  29. [30]

    M. Fang, S. Deng, Y. Zhang, Z. Shi, L. Chen, M. Pechenizkiy, J. Wang, Large language models are neurosymbolic reasoners, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09334 (2024). URL: https://github.com/hyintell/llmsymbolic. doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29754, submitted 17 January, 2024; originally ...

    2024 arXiv

  30. [31]

    G. Lima, A. Rademaker, R. Uceda-Sosa, ULKB Logic: A HOL-Based Framework for Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 55–71. URL: https://github.com/IBM/ULKB. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49342-3_4

    2023 doi

  31. [33]

    M. Marron, Toward programming languages for reasoning: Humans, symbolic systems, and ai agents, in: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software, Onward! 2023, Association for Computing Mac...

    2023

  32. [34]

    F. A. Saad, M. C. Rinard, V. K. Mansinghka, Sppl: probabilistic programming with fast exact symbolic inference, in: Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI 2021, Association for Computing Machinery, N...

    2021

  33. [35]

    Shindo, D

    H. Shindo, D. S. Dhami, K. Kersting, Neuro-symbolic forward reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09383 (2021). URL: https://github.com/ml-research/neumann. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39179-8 , submitted 18 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021

    2021 arXiv

  34. [36]

    H. Qian, R. Marinescu, A. Gray, D. Bhattacharjya, F. Barahona, T. Gao, R. Riegel, P. Sahu, Logical credal networks, 2021. URL: https://github.com/radum2275/crema. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2109.12240

    2021 doi arXiv

  35. [37]

    Ciatto, R

    G. Ciatto, R. Calegari, A. Omicini, 2p-kt: A logic-based ecosystem for symbolic ai, SoftwareX 16 (2021) 100817. URL: https://github.com/tuProlog/2p-kt. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2021.100817

    2021

  36. [38]

    Ahmed, K.-W

    K. Ahmed, K.-W. Chang, G. V. den Broeck, Semantic strengthening of neuro-symbolic learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.14207 (2023). URL: https://github.com/UCLA-StarAI/Semantic-Strengthening. doi:10.3233/faia230153, sub- mitted 27 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023

    2023 arXiv

  37. [39]

    S. J. Giri, P. Dutta, P. Halani, S. Saha, Multipredgo: Deep multi-modal protein function prediction by amalgamating protein structure, sequence, and interaction information, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 25 (2021) 1832–1838. URL: https://github.com/Swagarik...

    2021

  38. [40]

    Kapanipathi, I

    P. Kapanipathi, I. Abdelaziz, S. Ravishankar, S. Roukos, A. Gray, R. Astudillo, M. Chang, C. Cornelio, S. Dana, A. Fokoue, D. Garg, A. Gliozzo, S. Gurajada, H. Karanam, N. Khan, D. Khandelwal, Y.-S. Lee, Y. Li, F. Luus, N. Makondo, N. Mihinduku- lasooriya, T. Naseem, S. Neelam...

    2020 doi arXiv

  39. [41]

    V. Shah, A. Sharma, G. Shroff, L. Vig, T. Dash, A. Srinivasan, https://github.com/quark0/analogy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.08750 (2022). URL: https://github.com/LIANGKE23/Awesome-Knowledge-Graph-Reasoning. doi: 10.1109/ access.2021.3109443, submitted 19 September, 2022; origi...

    2022 arXiv

  40. [42]

    R. Wang, P. Jansen, M.-A. Côté, P. Ammanabrolu, Behavior cloned transformers are neurosymbolic reasoners, arXiv preprint 12 Brandon C. Colelough et al. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1–19 arXiv:2210.07382 (2022). URL: https://github.com/cognitiveailab/neurosymbolic. doi: 10.18653/v...

    2022 arXiv

  41. [43]

    Arabshahi, J

    F. Arabshahi, J. Lee, M. Gawarecki, K. Mazaitis, A. Azaria, T. Mitchell, Conversational neuro-symbolic commonsense reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10022 (2021). URL: https://github.com/ForoughA/CORGI. doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i6. 16623, submitted 2 February, 2021; v1 submitted...

    2021 arXiv

  42. [44]

    Chanin, A

    D. Chanin, A. Hunter, Neuro-symbolic commonsense social reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08264 (2023). URL: https://github.com/chanind/amr-logic-converter, submitted 14 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023

    2023 arXiv

  43. [45]

    Ismayilzada, D

    M. Ismayilzada, D. Paul, S. Montariol, M. Geva, A. Bosselut, Crow: Benchmarking commonsense reasoning in real-world tasks, 2023. URL: https://github.com/mismayil/crow. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2310.15239

    2023 doi arXiv

  44. [46]

    T. X. Olausson, A. Gu, B. Lipkin, C. E. Zhang, A. Solar-Lezama, J. B. Tenenbaum, R. Levy, Linc: A neurosymbolic approach for logical reasoning by combining language models with first-order logic provers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15164 (2023). URL: https://github.com/benlipkin...

    2023 arXiv

  45. [48]

    Saparov, H

    A. Saparov, H. He, Language models are greedy reasoners: A systematic formal analysis of chain-of-thought, 2022. URL: https://github.com/asaparov/prontoqa. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2210.01240

    2022 doi arXiv

  46. [49]

    C. Yang, S. Chaudhuri, Safe neurosymbolic learning with differentiable symbolic execution, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07671 (2022). URL: https://github.com/cxyang1997/dse. doi:10.23919/fmcad.2018.8602991, submitted 15 March, 2022; origi- nally announced March 2022

    2022 arXiv

  47. [50]

    S. Yang, X. Li, L. Cui, L. Bing, W. Lam, Neuro-symbolic integration brings causal and reliable reasoning proofs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09802 (2023). URL: https://github.com/damo-nlp-sg/caring. doi: 10.1109/twc.2023.3319981, submitted 16 November, 2023; originally announced...

    2023 arXiv

  48. [51]

    H. A. Akl, Psychic: A neuro-symbolic framework for knowledge graph question-answering grounding, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12638 (2023). URL: https://github.com/HannaAbiAkl/PSYCHIC. doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16625, submitted 19 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023

    2023 arXiv

  49. [52]

    Bosselut, R

    A. Bosselut, R. L. Bras, Y. Choi, Dynamic neuro-symbolic knowledge graph construction for zero-shot commonsense question answering, arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03876 (2020). URL: https://github.com/AlirezaDoakhan/QuestionAnswering. doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16625, submitted 30 Octo...

    2020 arXiv

  50. [53]

    S. Cha, H. Oh, Making symbolic execution promising by learning aggressive state-pruning strategy, in: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2020, Association for ...

    2020

  51. [54]

    Chaudhury, P

    S. Chaudhury, P. Sen, M. Ono, D. Kimura, M. Tatsubori, A. Munawar, Neuro-symbolic approaches for text-based policy learning, in: M.-F. Moens, X. Huang, L. Specia, S. W.-t. Yih (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Assoc...

    2021 doi

  52. [55]

    Z. Chen, R. Sun, W. Liu, Y. Hong, C. Gan, Genome: Generative neuro-symbolic visual reasoning by growing and reusing modules, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04901 (2023). URL: https://github.com/UMass-Foundation-Model/genome. doi: 10. 3233/faia230544, submitted 8 November, 2023; ori...

    2023 arXiv

  53. [56]

    Chitnis, T

    R. Chitnis, T. Silver, J. B. Tenenbaum, T. Lozano-Pérez, L. P. Kaelbling, Learning neuro-symbolic relational transition models for bilevel planning, in: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, pp. 4166–

    2022

  54. [57]

    Chitnis, T

    R. Chitnis, T. Silver, J. B. Tenenbaum, T. Lozano-Perez, L. P. Kaelbling, Learning neuro-symbolic relational transition models for bilevel planning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14074 (2022). URL: https://github.com/Learning-and-Intelligent-Systems/ predicators. doi:10.1109/iros4...

    2022 arXiv

  55. [58]

    Y. Feng, X. Yang, X. Zhu, M. Greenspan, Neuro-symbolic natural logic with introspective revision for natural language inference, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.04857 (2022). URL: https://github.com/feng-yufei/ns-nli. doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00458, submitted 5 June, 2022; v1 submitted 9 ...

    2022 arXiv

  56. [60]

    Hazra, B

    R. Hazra, B. Chen, A. Rai, N. Kamra, R. Desai, Egotv: Egocentric task verification from natural language task descriptions, in: 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023, pp. 15371–15383. URL: https://github.com/ facebookresearch/EgoTV. doi:10.1109...

    2023

  57. [61]

    Hazra, L

    R. Hazra, L. D. Raedt, Deep explainable relational reinforcement learning: A neuro-symbolic approach, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08349 (2023). URL: https://github.com/thuwzy/Neural-Symbolic-and-Probabilistic-Logic-Papers. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-031-43421-1_13 , submitted 14 July, ...

    2023 arXiv

  58. [62]

    J. He, G. Sivanrupan, P. Tsankov, M. Vechev, Learning to explore paths for symbolic execution, in: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS ’21, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2021, pp. 2526–2540. URL: ...

    2021

  59. [63]

    J. Hsu, J. Mao, J. Wu, Ns3d: Neuro-symbolic grounding of 3d objects and relations, in: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023, pp. 2614–2623. URL: https://github.com/joyhsu0504/NS3D. doi:10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00257

    2023

  60. [64]

    Kimura, M

    D. Kimura, M. Ono, S. Chaudhury, R. Kohita, A. Wachi, D. J. Agravante, M. Tatsubori, A. Munawar, A. Gray, Neuro-symbolic reinforcement learning with first-order logic, 2021. URL: https://github.com/cav-research-lab/ safe-reinforcement-learning-using-symbolic-logical-programmin...

    2021 doi arXiv

  61. [65]

    Kimura, S

    D. Kimura, S. Chaudhury, M. Ono, M. Tatsubori, D. J. Agravante, A. Munawar, A. Wachi, R. Kohita, A. Gray, Loa: Logical optimal actions for text-based interaction games, 2021. URL: https://github.com/ibm/loa. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2110. 10973

    2021 doi

  62. [66]

    van Krieken, T

    E. van Krieken, T. Thanapalasingam, J. M. Tomczak, F. van Harmelen, A. ten Teije, A-nesi: A scalable approximate method for probabilistic neurosymbolic inference, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12393 (2022). URL: https://github.com/hemile/a-nesi. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30215-5_37 , ...

    2022 arXiv

  63. [67]

    Mghames, L

    S. Mghames, L. Castri, M. Hanheide, N. Bellotto, A neuro-symbolic approach for enhanced human motion prediction, in: 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2023, pp. 1–8. URL: https://github.com/sariahmghames/ neurosym-prediction. doi:10.1109/IJCNN5454...

    2023

  64. [68]

    Murugesan, M

    K. Murugesan, M. Atzeni, P. Kapanipathi, P. Shukla, S. Kumaravel, G. Tesauro, K. Talamadupula, M. Sachan, M. Campbell, Text-based rl agents with commonsense knowledge: New challenges, environments and baselines, 2020. URL: https: //github.com/IBM/commonsense-rl. doi:10.48550/A...

    2020 doi arXiv

  65. [69]

    Nguyen, K

    T. Nguyen, K. Nguyen, H. Duong, Syminfer: inferring numerical invariants using symbolic states, in: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings, ICSE ’22, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2022,...

    2022

  66. [71]

    Sanyal, R

    S. Sanyal, R. K. Manna, K. Roy, Ev-planner: Energy-efficient robot navigation via event-based physics-guided neuromorphic planner, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9 (2024) 2080–2087. URL: https://github.com/souravsanyal06/ev-planner. doi:10.1109/LRA.2024.3350982

    2024

  67. [72]

    Sharifi, M

    I. Sharifi, M. Yildirim, S. Fallah, Towards safe autonomous driving policies using a neuro-symbolic deep reinforcement learning approach, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01316 (2023). URL: https://github.com/ cav-research-lab/safe-reinforcement-learning-using-symbolic-logical-progra...

    2023

  68. [73]

    Silver, A

    T. Silver, A. Athalye, J. B. Tenenbaum, T. Lozano-Perez, L. P. Kaelbling, Learning neuro-symbolic skills for bilevel planning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10680 (2022). URL: https://github.com/Learning-and-Intelligent-Systems/predicators. doi: 10. 1109/iros47612.2022.9981440, su...

    2022 arXiv

  69. [74]

    R. Wang, P. Jansen, M.-A. Côté, P. Ammanabrolu, Scienceworld: Is your agent smarter than a 5th grader?, 2022. URL: https://github.com/allenai/scienceworld. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2203.07540

    2022 doi arXiv

  70. [75]

    Winters, G

    T. Winters, G. Marra, R. Manhaeve, L. De Raedt, Deepstochlog: Neural stochastic logic programming, 2021. URL: https: //github.com/ML-KULeuven/deepstochlog. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2106.12574

    2021 doi arXiv

  71. [76]

    R. Yan, A. Julius, M. Chang, A. Fokoue, T. Ma, R. Uceda-Sosa, Stone: Signal temporal logic neural network for time series classification, in: 2021 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 2021, pp. 778–787. URL: https://github.com/anand-bala/signal-temporal-l...

    2021

  72. [77]

    R. Yan, T. Ma, A. Fokoue, M. Chang, A. Julius, Neuro-symbolic models for interpretable time series classification using temporal logic description, in: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 2022, pp. 618–627. URL: https://github.com/xiyuanzh/time-series-pap...

    2022

  73. [78]

    R. Yan, T. Ma, A. Fokoue, M. Chang, A. Julius, Neuro-symbolic models for interpretable time series classification using temporal logic description, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.09114 (2022). URL: https://github.com/xiyuanzh/time-series-papers. doi:10.1109/icdm54844.2022.00072, su...

    2022 arXiv

  74. [79]

    Badreddine, A

    S. Badreddine, A. d’Avila Garcez, L. Serafini, M. Spranger, Logic tensor networks, Artificial Intelligence 303 (2022) 103649. URL: https://github.com/logictensornetworks/logictensornetworks. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103649

    2022

  75. [80]

    Dickens, C

    C. Dickens, C. Gao, C. Pryor, S. Wright, L. Getoor, Convex and bilevel optimization for neuro-symbolic inference and learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09651 (2024). URL: https://github.com/convexbilevelnesylearning/psl. doi:10.1109/ iros47612.2022.9981440, submitted 17 Janua...

    2024 arXiv

  76. [82]

    Potteiger, X

    N. Potteiger, X. Koutsoukos, Safe explainable agents for autonomous navigation using evolving behavior trees, in: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA), 2023, pp. 44–52. URL: https://github.com/tmgthb/ Autonomous-Agents. doi:10.1109/ICAA58325.2023.00014

    2023

  77. [84]

    J. Da, R. L. Bras, X. Lu, Y. Choi, A. Bosselut, Analyzing commonsense emergence in few-shot knowledge models, 2021. URL: https://github.com/allenai/few-shot-comet. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2101.00297

    2021 doi arXiv

  78. [85]

    Feinman, B

    R. Feinman, B. M. Lake, Learning task-general representations with generative neuro-symbolic modeling, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.14448 (2021). URL: https://github.com/rfeinman/GNS-Modeling. doi:10.1145/3539618.3594246, submitted 23 January, 2021; v1 submitted 25 June, 2020; or...

    2021 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Gholipour Ghalandari, C

    D. Gholipour Ghalandari, C. Hokamp, N. T. Pham, J. Glover, G. Ifrim, A large-scale multi-document summarization dataset from the Wikipedia current events portal, in: D. Jurafsky, J. Chai, N. Schluter, J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Associati...

    2020 doi

  80. [88]

    Yasunaga, J

    M. Yasunaga, J. Leskovec, P. Liang, Linkbert: Pretraining language models with document links, 2022. URL: https://github. com/michiyasunaga/LinkBERT. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2203.15827

    2022 doi arXiv

  81. [89]

    E. Zhan, J. J. Sun, A. Kennedy, Y. Yue, S. Chaudhuri, Unsupervised learning of neurosymbolic encoders, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13132 (2021). URL: https://github.com/ezhan94/neurosymbolic-encoders. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105851, submitted 20 December, 2022; v1 submitted 27 J...

    2021 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Y. Zhou, R. Feinman, B. M. Lake, Compositional diversity in visual concept learning, 2023. URL: https://github.com/yanlizhou/ CompositionalDiversity. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2305.19374

    2023 doi arXiv

  83. [91]

    Roberts, H

    A. Roberts, H. W. Chung, A. Levskaya, G. Mishra, J. Bradbury, D. Andor, S. Narang, B. Lester, C. Gaffney, A. Mohiuddin, C. Hawthorne, A. Lewkowycz, A. Salcianu, M. van Zee, J. Austin, S. Goodman, L. B. Soares, H. Hu, S. Tsvyashchenko, A. Chowdhery, J. Bastings, J. Bulian, X. G...

    2022 doi arXiv

  84. [92]

    Fabiano, V

    F. Fabiano, V. Pallagani, M. B. Ganapini, L. Horesh, A. Loreggia, K. Murugesan, F. Rossi, B. Srivastava, Plan-SOFAI: A neuro- symbolic planning architecture, in: Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning in the era of Large Language Models, 2023. URL: https://github.com/FrancescoF...

    2023

  85. [93]

    D. J. Agravante, D. Kimura, M. Tatsubori, Learning neuro-symbolic world models with logical neural networks, in: PRL Workshop Series – Bridging the Gap Between AI Planning and Reinforcement Learning, 2023. URL: https://github.com/ IBM/LNN. arXiv:https://openreview.net/forum?id...

    2023

  86. [94]

    N. Haut, W. Banzhaf, B. Punch, Active learning improves performance on symbolic regression tasks in stackgp, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, GECCO ’22, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2022, pp. 550–553. ...

    2022 doi

  87. [95]

    N. Haut, B. Punch, W. Banzhaf, Active learning informs symbolic regression model development in genetic programming, in: Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO ’23 Companion, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA...

    2023

  88. [99]

    A. Liu, S. Swayamdipta, N. A. Smith, Y. Choi, Wanli: Worker and ai collaboration for natural language inference dataset creation, 2022. URL: https://github.com/alisawuffles/wanli. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2201.05955

    2022 doi arXiv

  89. [100]

    A. Ross, T. Wu, H. Peng, M. Peters, M. Gardner, Tailor: Generating and perturbing text with semantic controls, in: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022. ...

    2022 doi

  90. [101]

    Smirnova, J

    A. Smirnova, J. Yang, D. Yang, P. Cudre-Mauroux, Nessy: A neuro-symbolic system for label noise reduction, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 35 (2023) 8300–8311. URL: https://github.com/eXascaleInfolab/Nessy_RE. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2022.3199570

    2023

  91. [102]

    e. a. Srivastava, Beyond the imitation game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models (2022). URL: https://github.com/google/BIG-bench. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2206.04615

    2022 doi arXiv

  92. [103]

    Sukhbaatar, D

    S. Sukhbaatar, D. JU, S. Poff, S. Roller, A. Szlam, J. E. Weston, A. Fan, Not all memories are created equal: Learn- ing to expire, 2021. URL: https://github.com/lucidrains/learning-to-expire-pytorch. doi: 10.1037/e527342012-077. arXiv:https://openreview.net/forum?id=ZVBtN6B_6i7

    2021 doi

  93. [104]

    Y. Wu, M. Gardner, P. Stenetorp, P. Dasigi, Generating data to mitigate spurious correlations in natural language inference datasets, in: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Association for Computatio...

    2022 doi

  94. [105]

    J. D. Hwang, C. Bhagavatula, R. Le Bras, J. Da, K. Sakaguchi, A. Bosselut, Y. Choi, (comet-) atomic 2020: On symbolic and neural commonsense knowledge graphs, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 35 (2021) 6384–6392. URL: https://github.com/allenai/com...

    2021 doi

  95. [106]

    Ismayilzada, A

    M. Ismayilzada, A. Bosselut, kogito: A commonsense knowledge inference toolkit, 2022. URL: https://github.com/epfl-nlp/ kogito. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2211.08451

    2022 doi arXiv

  96. [107]

    Mostafazadeh, A

    N. Mostafazadeh, A. Kalyanpur, L. Moon, D. Buchanan, L. Berkowitz, O. Biran, J. Chu-Carroll, Glucose: Generalized and contextualized story explanations, 2020. URL: https://github.com/ElementalCognition/glucose. doi:10.48550/ARXIV. 2009.07758

    2020 doi arXiv

  97. [108]

    Papoulias, Neuroql: A neuro-symbolic language and dataset for inter-subjective reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07146 (2023)

    N. Papoulias, Neuroql: A neuro-symbolic language and dataset for inter-subjective reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07146 (2023). URL: https://github.com/orgdlabs/neuroQL. doi:10.1109/cict56698.2022.9997814, submitted 13 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023

    2023 arXiv

  98. [109]

    Perevalov, D

    A. Perevalov, D. Diefenbach, R. Usbeck, A. Both, Qald-9-plus: A multilingual dataset for question answering over dbpedia and wikidata translated by native speakers, 2022. URL: https://github.com/perevalov/qald_9_plus. doi:10.48550/ARXIV. 2202.00120

    2022 doi arXiv

  99. [110]

    D. N. Ribeiro, K. Forbus, Combining analogy with language models for knowledge extraction, in: 3rd Conference on Auto- mated Knowledge Base Construction, 2021. URL: https://github.com/dnr2/analogical-ke. doi:10.59350/mk9dg-4r198

    2021 doi

  100. [111]

    Z. Chen, G. Weiss, E. Mitchell, A. Celikyilmaz, A. Bosselut, Reckoning: Reasoning through dynamic knowledge encoding,

  101. [112]

    Agafonov, A

    A. Agafonov, A. Ponomarev, Localization of ontology concepts in deep convolutional neural networks, in: 2022 IEEE International Multi-Conference on Engineering, Computer and Information Sciences (SIBIRCON), 2022, pp. 160–165. URL: https://github.com/aaagafonov/Concept-Localiza...

    2022

  102. [113]

    Harmon, S

    I. Harmon, S. Marconi, B. Weinstein, Y. Bai, D. Z. Wang, E. White, S. Bohlman, Improving rare tree species classifica- tion using domain knowledge, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 20 (2023) 1–5. URL: https://github.com/ satellite-image-deep-learning/techniques. doi:...

    2023

  103. [114]

    Racharak, On approximation of concept similarity measure in description logic elh with pre-trained word embedding, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 61429–61443

    T. Racharak, On approximation of concept similarity measure in description logic elh with pre-trained word embedding, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 61429–61443. URL: https://github.com/monologg/nlp-arxiv-daily. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073730

    2021

  104. [115]

    K. Raj, A neuro-symbolic approach to enhance interpretability of graph neural network through the integration of external knowledge, in: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM ’23, Association for Computing Machinery,...

    2023

  105. [116]

    L. F. R. Ribeiro, M. Liu, I. Gurevych, M. Dreyer, M. Bansal, Factgraph: Evaluating factuality in summarization with semantic graph representations, 2022. URL: https://github.com/amazon-research/fact-graph. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2204.06508

    2022 doi arXiv

  106. [117]

    J. Chen, D. Yang, Structure-aware abstractive conversation summarization via discourse and action graphs, 2021. URL: https://github.com/GT-SALT/Structure-Aware-BART. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2104.08400

    2021 doi arXiv

  107. [118]

    understanding

    J. Hessel, A. Marasović, J. D. Hwang, L. Lee, J. Da, R. Zellers, R. Mankoff, Y. Choi, Do androids laugh at electric sheep? humor "understanding" benchmarks from the new yorker caption contest (2022). URL: https://github.com/jmhessel/caption_ contest_corpus. doi:10.48550/ARXIV....

    2022 doi arXiv

  108. [119]

    Kalyanpur, T

    A. Kalyanpur, T. Breloff, D. Ferrucci, Braid: Weaving symbolic and neural knowledge into coherent logical explanations,

  109. [120]

    D. Wan, M. Bansal, Factpegasus: Factuality-aware pre-training and fine-tuning for abstractive summarization, 2022. URL: https://github.com/meetdavidwan/factpegasus. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2205.07830

    2022 doi arXiv

  110. [121]

    Künnecke, A

    F. Künnecke, A. Filighera, C. Leong, T. Steuer, Enhancing multi-domain automatic short answer grading through an explainable neuro-symbolic pipeline, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01811 (2024). URL: https://github.com/iwangjian/ Paper-Reading-ConvAI. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.29...

    2024 arXiv

  111. [122]

    Ahmed, K.-W

    K. Ahmed, K.-W. Chang, G. V. d. Broeck, A pseudo-semantic loss for autoregressive models with logical constraints, 2023. URL: https://github.com/UCLA-StarAI/PseudoSL. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2312.03905

    2023 doi arXiv

  112. [123]

    Ahmetoglu, M

    A. Ahmetoglu, M. Y. Seker, J. Piater, E. Oztop, E. Ugur, Deepsym: Deep symbol generation and rule learning for planning from unsupervised robot interaction, J. Artif. Int. Res. 75 (2022). URL: https://github.com/alper111/DeepSym. doi: 10.1613/ jair.1.13754. 16 Brandon C. Colel...

    2022

  113. [124]

    K. G. Baugh, N. Cingillioglu, A. Russo, Neuro-symbolic rule learning in real-world classification tasks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16674 (2023). URL: https://github.com/kittykg/neural-dnf-cub. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.57, sub- mitted 29 March, 2023; originally announced...

    2023 arXiv

  114. [125]

    Calinescu, C

    R. Calinescu, C. Imrie, R. Mangal, G. N. Rodrigues, C. Păsăreanu, M. A. Santana, G. Vázquez, Controller synthesis for autonomous systems with deep-learning perception components, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2024) 1–22. URL: https://github.com/ccimrie/DeepDECS. d...

    2024

  115. [126]

    Cingillioglu, A

    N. Cingillioglu, A. Russo, pix2rule: End-to-end neuro-symbolic rule learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07487 (2021). URL: https://github.com/kittykg/neural-dnf-cub. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-86340-1_4 , submitted 28 February, 2022; v1 submitted 14 June, 2021; originally announce...

    2021 arXiv

  116. [127]

    Cunnington, M

    D. Cunnington, M. Law, J. Lobo, A. Russo, Neuro-symbolic learning of answer set programs from raw data, arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12735 (2022). URL: https://github.com/dancunnington/nsil. doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/399, submit- ted 2 February, 2024; v1 submitted 25 May, 2022; ori...

    2022 arXiv

  117. [128]

    D. Dold, J. S. Garrido, An energy-based model for neuro-symbolic reasoning on knowledge graphs, in: 2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 2021, pp. 916–921. URL: https://github.com/ dodo47/cyberml. doi:10.1109/ICMLA52953.2021.00151

    2021

  118. [129]

    S. Gao, J. D. Hwang, S. Kanno, H. Wakaki, Y. Mitsufuji, A. Bosselut, Comfact: A benchmark for linking contextual commonsense knowledge, 2022. URL: https://github.com/silin159/comfact. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2210.12678

    2022 doi arXiv

  119. [130]

    S. Gao, B. Borges, S. Oh, D. Bayazit, S. Kanno, H. Wakaki, Y. Mitsufuji, A. Bosselut, Peacok: Persona commonsense knowledge for consistent and engaging narratives, 2023. URL: https://github.com/silin159/peacok. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2305.02364

    2023 doi arXiv

  120. [131]

    Harmon, S

    I. Harmon, S. Marconi, B. Weinstein, S. Graves, D. Z. Wang, A. Zare, S. Bohlman, A. Singh, E. White, Injecting domain knowledge into deep neural networks for tree crown delineation, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60 (2022) 1–19. URL: https://github.com/sate...

    2022

  121. [132]

    T. He, L. Gao, J. Song, Y.-F. Li, Toward a unified transformer-based framework for scene graph generation and human-object interaction detection, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 32 (2023) 6274–6288. URL: https://github.com/DirtyHarryLYL/ Transformer-in-Vision. doi: 10.11...

    2023

  122. [133]

    J. Hong, T. P. Pavlic, An insect-inspired randomly, weighted neural network with random fourier features for neuro- symbolic relational learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06663 (2021). URL: https://github.com/jyhong0304/SII. doi:10.1007/ 11816157_123, submitted 11 September, ...

    2021 arXiv

  123. [134]

    Howard, J

    P. Howard, J. Wang, V. Lal, G. Singer, Y. Choi, S. Swayamdipta, Neurocomparatives: Neuro-symbolic distillation of comparative knowledge, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04978 (2023). URL: https://github.com/KSESEU/LLMPapers/blob/main/ README.md. doi:10.5220/0011718500003393, submitt...

    2023 arXiv

  124. [135]

    Huang, Z

    J. Huang, Z. Li, M. Naik, S.-N. Lim, Laser: A neuro-symbolic framework for learning spatial-temporal scene graphs with weak supervision, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07647 (2023). URL: https://github.com/isLinXu/paper-list. doi: 10.23919/ eusipco58844.2023.10289877, submitted 22 ...

    2023

  125. [136]

    Khatiwada, S

    A. Khatiwada, S. Shirai, K. Srinivas, O. Hassanzadeh, Knowledge graph embeddings for causal relation prediction, in: Workshop on Deep Learning for Knowledge Graphs (DL4KG@ISWC2022), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR- WS.org, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA; Boston, MA, USA; Troy, NY, ...

    2022 doi

  126. [137]

    H. Kim, J. Bak, K. Cho, H. Koo, A transformer-based function symbol name inference model from an assembly language for binary reversing, in: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ASIA CCS ’23, Association for Computing Machinery, ...

    2023

  127. [138]

    Klinger, L

    T. Klinger, L. Liu, S. Dan, M. Crouse, P. Ram, A. Gray, Compositional program generation for few-shot systematic general- ization, 2023. URL: https://github.com/IBM/cpg. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2309.16467

    2023 doi arXiv

  128. [139]

    Y. Li, J. Mao, X. Zhang, W. T. Freeman, J. B. Tenenbaum, J. Wu, Perspective plane program induction from a single image, in: 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 4433–4442. URL: https://github.com/42x00/p3i. doi:10.1109/CVPR4260...

    2020

  129. [140]

    Liang, W

    H. Liang, W. Lei, P. Y. Chan, Z. Yang, M. Sun, T.-S. Chua, Pirhdy: Learning pitch-, rhythm-, and dynamics-aware embeddings for symbolic music, in: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM ’20, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA...

    2020

  130. [141]

    L. Luo, G. Zhang, H. Xu, Y. Yang, C. Fang, Q. Li, Insight: End-to-end neuro-symbolic visual reinforcement learning with language explanations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12451 (2024). URL: https://github.com/liruiluo/nsrl-vision-pub. doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.345, sub...

    2024 arXiv

  131. [142]

    Marconato, G

    E. Marconato, G. Bontempo, E. Ficarra, S. Calderara, A. Passerini, S. Teso, Neuro-symbolic continual learning: Knowledge, reasoning shortcuts and concept rehearsal, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01242 (2023). URL: https://github.com/ema-marconato/ nesy-cl. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-3...

    2023 arXiv

  132. [143]

    Marconato, S

    E. Marconato, S. Teso, A. Vergari, A. Passerini, Not all neuro-symbolic concepts are created equal: Analysis and mitigation of 17 Brandon C. Colelough et al. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1–19 reasoning shortcuts, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19951 (2023). URL: https://github.com/ema...

    2023 arXiv

  133. [144]

    Marconato, S

    E. Marconato, S. Bortolotti, E. van Krieken, A. Vergari, A. Passerini, S. Teso, Bears make neuro-symbolic models aware of their reasoning shortcuts, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12240 (2024). URL: https://github.com/samuelebortolotti/bears. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39179-8 , submitt...

    2024 arXiv

  134. [145]

    Martone, F

    S. Martone, F. Manigrasso, F. Lamberti, L. Morra, Prototypical logic tensor networks (proto-ltn) for zero shot learning, in: 2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2022, pp. 4427–4433. URL: https://github.com/ francescomanigrass/proto-ltn. doi:10.110...

    2022

  135. [146]

    Mukherji, D

    K. Mukherji, D. Parkar, L. Pokala, D. Aditya, P. Shakarian, C. Dorman, Scalable semantic non-markovian simulation proxy for reinforcement learning, in: 2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), 2024, pp. 183–190. URL: https://github.com/yingchengyan...

    2024

  136. [147]

    N. K, H. Singh, V. Bindal, A. Tuli, V. Agrawal, R. Jain, P. Singla, R. Paul, Learning neuro-symbolic programs for language guided robot manipulation, in: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2023, pp. 7973–7980. URL: https://github.com/dair-iit...

    2023

  137. [148]

    Núñez-Molina, P

    C. Núñez-Molina, P. Mesejo, J. Fernández-Olivares, Nesig: A neuro-symbolic method for learning to generate planning problems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10280 (2023). URL: https://github.com/IBM/neuro-symbolic-ai. doi: 10.1609/aaai. v38i21.30409, submitted 24 January, 2023; ori...

    2023 arXiv

  138. [149]

    Oruganti, S

    S. Oruganti, S. Nirenburg, J. English, M. McShane, Automating knowledge acquisition for content-centric cognitive agents using llms, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 379–385. URL: https://github.com/AGI-Edgerunners/ LLM-Agents-Papers. doi: 10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27703

    2024 doi

  139. [150]

    Potnis, D

    A. Potnis, D. Lunga, A. Sorokine, P. Dias, L. Yang, J. Arndt, J. Bowman, J. Wohlgemuth, Towards geospatial knowledge graph infused neuro-symbolic ai for remote sensing scene understanding, in: IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2023,...

    2023

  140. [151]

    Purohit, Y

    D. Purohit, Y. Chudasama, A. Rivas, M.-E. Vidal, Sparkle: Symbolic capturing of knowledge for knowledge graph enrichment with learning, in: Proceedings of the 12th Knowledge Capture Conference 2023, K-CAP ’23, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023, pp. 4...

    2023 doi

  141. [152]

    Raymond, Q

    C. Raymond, Q. Chen, B. Xue, M. Zhang, Learning symbolic model-agnostic loss functions via meta-learning, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45 (2023) 13699–13714. URL: https://github.com/decadz/ evolved-model-agnostic-loss. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3294394

    2023

  142. [153]

    Ruaro, K

    N. Ruaro, K. Zeng, L. Dresel, M. Polino, T. Bao, A. Continella, S. Zanero, C. Kruegel, G. Vigna, Syml: Guiding symbolic execution toward vulnerable states through pattern learning, in: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defen...

    2021

  143. [154]

    S. S. Saha, S. S. Sandha, M. Aggarwal, B. Wang, L. Han, J. D. G. Briseno, M. Srivastava, Tinyns: Platform-aware neurosymbolic auto tiny machine learning, ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 23 (2024). URL: https://github.com/nesl/neurosymbolic-tinyml. doi:10.1145/3603171

    2024 doi

  144. [155]

    Shirai, D

    S. Shirai, D. Bhattacharjya, O. Hassanzadeh, Event prediction using case-based reasoning over knowledge graphs, in: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, WWW ’23, ACM, 2023. URL: https://github.com/solashirai/www-evcbr. doi:10.1145/3543507.3583201

    2023

  145. [156]

    Tao, Y.-X

    L. Tao, Y.-X. Huang, W.-Z. Dai, Y. Jiang, Deciphering raw data in neuro-symbolic learning with provable guarantees, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10487 (2023). URL: https://github.com/abductivelearning/abl-tl. doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i14.29455, submitted 23 January, 2024; v1 submitted...

    2023 arXiv

  146. [157]

    Valenti, D

    A. Valenti, D. Bacciu, Leveraging relational information for learning weakly disentangled representations, in: 2022 Interna- tional Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2022, pp. 1–8. URL: https://github.com/andrea-v/weak-disentanglement. doi:10.1109/IJCNN55064.2022.9892093

    2022

  147. [158]

    Y. Wang, Z. Tu, Y. Xiang, S. Zhou, X. Chen, B. Li, T. Zhang, Rapid image labeling via neuro-symbolic learning, in: Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’23, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2023, pp. 2...

    2023

  148. [159]

    Werner, N

    L. Werner, N. Layaïda, P. Genevès, S. Chlyah, Knowledge enhanced graph neural networks, in: 2023 IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 2023, pp. 1–10. URL: https://github.com/RUCDM/KB4Rec. doi:10.1109/DSAA60987.2023.10302495

    2023

  149. [160]

    T. Wu, M. Tjandrasuwita, Z. Wu, X. Yang, K. Liu, R. Sosič, J. Leskovec, Zeroc: A neuro-symbolic model for zero-shot concept recognition and acquisition at inference time, arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.15049 (2022). URL: https://github.com/ snap-stanford/zeroc. doi:10.1109/tmm.2023...

    2022 arXiv

  150. [161]

    Ahmed, S

    K. Ahmed, S. Teso, K.-W. Chang, G. V. den Broeck, A. Vergari, Semantic probabilistic layers for neuro-symbolic learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00426 (2022). URL: https://github.com/thuwzy/Neural-Symbolic-and-Probabilistic-Logic-Papers. doi:10.3233/faia230153, submitted 1 J...

    2022 arXiv

  151. [162]

    Himabindu, R

    M. Himabindu, R. V, M. Gupta, A. Rana, P. K. Chandra, H. S. Abdulaali, Neuro-symbolic ai: Integrating symbolic reasoning with deep learning, in: 2023 10th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON), volume 10...

    2023

  152. [163]

    Y. Xian, Z. Fu, H. Zhao, Y. Ge, X. Chen, Q. Huang, S. Geng, Z. Qin, G. de Melo, S. Muthukrishnan, Y. Zhang, Cafe: Coarse-to- fine neural symbolic reasoning for explainable recommendation, in: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & amp; Knowledge ...

    2020

  153. [164]

    Zheng, K

    K. Zheng, K. Zhou, J. Gu, Y. Fan, J. Wang, Z. Di, X. He, X. E. Wang, Jarvis: A neuro-symbolic commonsense reasoning frame- work for conversational embodied agents, arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.13266 (2022). URL: https://github.com/DirtyHarryLYL/ Transformer-in-Vision. doi: 10.160...

    2022 arXiv

  154. [165]

    C. S. Pinhanez, H. Candello, P. Cavalin, M. C. Pichiliani, A. P. Appel, V. H. Alves Ribeiro, J. Nogima, M. de Bayser, M. Guerra, H. Ferreira, G. Malfatti, Integrating machine learning data with symbolic knowledge from collaboration practices of curators to improve conversation...

    2021

  155. [166]

    Stammer, P

    W. Stammer, P. Schramowski, K. Kersting, Right for the right concept: Revising neuro-symbolic concepts by interacting with their explanations, in: 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2021, pp. 3618–3628. URL: https://github.com/ml-resear...

    2021

  156. [167]

    R. H. Thomson, N. D. Bastian, Integrating cognitive architectures with foundation models: Cognitively-guided few- shot learning to support trusted artificial intelligence, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 409–414. doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27708

    2024 doi

  157. [168]

    N. Weir, P. Clark, B. V. Durme, Nellie: A neuro-symbolic inference engine for grounded, compositional, and explainable reasoning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07662 (2022). URL: https://github.com/JHU-CLSP/NELLIE. doi:10.1117/12.2587850, submitted 21 December, 2023; v1 submitted ...

    2022 arXiv

  158. [169]

    Joshi, V

    H. Joshi, V. Ustun, Augmenting cognitive architectures with large language models, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 281–285. URL: https://github.com/ysymyth/awesome-language-agents. doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27689

    2024 doi

  159. [170]

    Y. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Shen, Combining minds and machines: Investigating the fusion of cognitive architectures and generative models for general embodied intelligence, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 307–314. URL: https: //github.com/Yangyi-Chen/Multimodal-AND-La...

    2024 doi

  160. [171]

    McDonald, T

    C. McDonald, T. Malloy, T. N. Nguyen, C. Gonzalez, Exploring the path from instructions to rewards with large language models in instance-based learning, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 334–339. URL: https://github.com/ datainsightat/introduction_llm. doi:10....

    2024 doi

  161. [172]

    A. Raja, A. Leshchenko, J. Kim, Leveraging conflict to bridge cognitive reasoning and generative algorithms, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 391–395. URL: https://github.com/cmhungsteve/Awesome-Transformer-Attention. doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27705

    2024 doi

  162. [173]

    S. I. Harini, G. Shroff, A. Srinivasan, P. Faldu, L. Vig, Neuro-symbolic meta reinforcement learning for trading, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08996 (2023). URL: https://github.com/IBM/neuro-symbolic-ai. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.283, submitted 15 January, 2023; originally...

    2023 arXiv

  163. [174]

    O. J. Romero, J. Zimmerman, A. Steinfeld, A. Tomasic, Synergistic integration of large language models and cognitive architectures for robust ai: An exploratory analysis, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 396–405. URL: https://github.com/ysymyth/awesome-languag...

    2024 doi

  164. [175]

    T. R. Sumers, S. Yao, K. Narasimhan, T. L. Griffiths, Cognitive architectures for language agents, 2023. URL: https://github. com/ysymyth/awesome-language-agents. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2309.02427

    2023 doi arXiv

  165. [176]

    R. L. West, S. Eckler, B. Conway-Smith, N. Turcas, E. Tomkins-Flanagan, M. A. Kelly, Bridging generative networks with the common model of cognition, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 415–421

    2024

  166. [177]

    Choi, On using generative models in a cognitive architecture for embodied agents, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 253–255

    D. Choi, On using generative models in a cognitive architecture for embodied agents, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series 2 (2024) 253–255. URL: https://github.com/ysymyth/awesome-language-agents. doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27684

    2024 doi

  167. [178]

    Masters Along the Way

    J. E. Laird, C. Lebiere, P. S. Rosenbloom, A standard model of the mind: Toward a common computational framework across artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics, AI Magazine 38 (2017) 13–26. doi: 10.1609/aimag. v38i4.2744. 19 University of Marylan...

    2017 arXiv

  168. [2017]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1706.03762

    doi arXiv

  169. [2020]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2011.13354

    URL: https://github.com/chanind/tensor-theorem-prover. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2011.13354

    2011 doi arXiv

  170. [2021]

    URL: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:245698629

  171. [2023]

    doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2305.06349

    URL: https://github.com/eric11eca/reckoning-metakg. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2305.06349

    doi arXiv

  172. [4173]

    doi: 10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981440

    URL: https://github.com/Learning-and-Intelligent-Systems/predicators. doi: 10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981440

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.