pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30016 · v1 · pith:BSKOOJNYnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Magnetic precession induced spin accumulation in collinear antiferromagnets

Q. Xue , J. Zhou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 06:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords antiferromagnetic spintronicsspin accumulationmagnetic precessioncollinear antiferromagnetsPT symmetrystaggered spin polarizationuniform spin polarizationNéel vector
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic precession generates uniform and staggered spin polarization at opposite sublattices in single collinear antiferromagnets

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that magnetic precession near the equilibrium magnetic axis produces finite uniform and staggered spin polarization at the opposite magnetic sublattices in a single antiferromagnetic semiconductor. This response occurs without a heterojunction setup and therefore sidesteps lattice mismatch issues. Group-theoretical analysis of PT-invariant symmetry groups identifies the constraints that permit these responses and distinguishes their fieldlike and dampinglike characters. Perturbative and ab initio simulations indicate that electric gate fields and Floquet light dressing can control the magnitude of the effect.

Core claim

In collinear antiferromagnets belonging to PT-invariant symmetry groups, magnetic precession near the equilibrium magnetic axis generates finite uniform and staggered spin polarization at the opposite magnetic sublattices, corresponding to total magnetic moment and Néel vector generation. The effect is captured by perturbative theory and symmetry analysis that reveal the allowed fieldlike and dampinglike responses. Electric gate fields and light dressing provide routes to manipulate the resulting spin accumulation.

What carries the argument

PT-invariant symmetry groups that permit staggered spin accumulation responses under magnetic precession, identified through group-theoretical constraints and perturbative expansion

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy perturbative regime and the specific PT-invariant symmetry groups chosen are sufficient to capture the dominant spin accumulation response without higher-order corrections or material-specific damping that would suppress the effect.

What would settle it

Measurement showing zero uniform and staggered spin polarization during magnetic precession in a PT-symmetric collinear antiferromagnet would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30016 by J. Zhou, Q. Xue.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic plot of antiferromagnetic bipartite lat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Low energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Results for a MnBi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Field effect to modulate the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Generating and characterizing uniform and staggered spin polarization in antiferromagnets is one of the key challenges for antiferromagnetic spintronic technology. Here, we perform perturbative theory, group-theoretical symmetry analysis, low energy and ab initio simulations to propose that the magnetic precession near the equilibrium magnetic axis could generate finite uniform and staggered spin polarization at the opposite magnetic sublattices (referring to total magnetic and N\'eel vector generation) in a single AFM semiconductors. This response does not require the heterojunction setup and could eliminate the lattice mismatch issues at the junction. Through scrutinizing all symmetrically-protected vanishing magnetic moment groups and especially focusing on parity-time (PT ) invariant groups, we identify the symmetry constraints that describe the staggered spin accumulation responses, and disclose their fieldlike and dampinglike characters. This unravels a hidden spin accumulation mode in AFM semiconductors. Furthermore, we simulate such an effect using a perturbative approach and suggest that electric gate field and Floquet light-dressing can effectively manipulate these responses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that magnetic precession near the equilibrium axis in collinear antiferromagnetic semiconductors can generate finite uniform and staggered spin polarization (total moment and Néel vector) at opposite sublattices via symmetry-allowed responses in PT-invariant groups. This is derived from group-theoretical analysis identifying fieldlike and dampinglike channels, supported by perturbative theory and ab initio simulations, and proposed to be manipulable by gate fields or Floquet light-dressing without requiring heterojunctions.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work identifies a hidden spin accumulation mode in single-material AFMs that could simplify spintronic device design by eliminating lattice-mismatch issues at junctions. The explicit use of symmetry constraints to classify responses and the combination of perturbative plus ab initio methods constitute a strength; the proposal is framed as falsifiable through the identified symmetry groups.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (perturbative approach and ab initio simulations): the induced polarization is computed in the low-energy regime without restoring Gilbert damping or magnon-scattering terms in the dynamics; the manuscript therefore does not demonstrate that the response remains appreciable once dissipative channels are included, which directly bears on whether the effect survives in realistic materials.
  2. [§3] §3 (PT-invariant symmetry analysis): while the classification correctly identifies allowed fieldlike and dampinglike channels, no quantitative bounds or higher-order correction estimates are provided to show that these channels dominate over material-specific effects outside the chosen symmetry groups.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: quantitative error estimates or specific material examples from the ab initio runs are absent, which would help readers assess the magnitude of the reported responses.
  2. [Results] Notation: the distinction between uniform and staggered polarization is clearly introduced but the mapping to total magnetic moment versus Néel vector could be stated more explicitly in the first paragraph of the results section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (perturbative approach and ab initio simulations): the induced polarization is computed in the low-energy regime without restoring Gilbert damping or magnon-scattering terms in the dynamics; the manuscript therefore does not demonstrate that the response remains appreciable once dissipative channels are included, which directly bears on whether the effect survives in realistic materials.

    Authors: We agree that the present calculations omit explicit Gilbert damping and magnon scattering. The symmetry-allowed channels we derive are independent of the specific dynamical model and remain valid whenever a sustained precession is present (e.g., under continuous driving). In low-damping antiferromagnetic semiconductors the induced polarization should therefore survive. We will add a paragraph in the revised §4 discussing this limitation and the conditions under which the effect is expected to remain observable. revision: partial

  2. Referee: §3 (PT-invariant symmetry analysis): while the classification correctly identifies allowed fieldlike and dampinglike channels, no quantitative bounds or higher-order correction estimates are provided to show that these channels dominate over material-specific effects outside the chosen symmetry groups.

    Authors: The group-theoretical classification is strictly valid inside the PT-invariant groups we enumerate; any material-specific correction that violates those symmetries is excluded by construction. Outside the listed groups the channels are symmetry-forbidden. We will insert a clarifying sentence in §3 stating that the analysis applies exclusively within the identified symmetry classes and does not claim dominance in materials that break those symmetries. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on independent symmetry analysis and simulations

full rationale

The paper's central claim is derived from perturbative theory, group-theoretical symmetry analysis, and ab initio simulations applied to PT-invariant groups in AFM semiconductors. No equations, parameters, or predictions are shown to reduce by construction to fitted inputs or self-citations. The response is framed as emerging from symmetry constraints that identify allowed fieldlike/dampinglike channels, with no load-bearing self-referential definitions or renamings of known results. This is a standard self-contained theoretical proposal against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the proposal invokes standard perturbative and symmetry methods whose details are not provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5699 in / 1127 out tokens · 26473 ms · 2026-06-29T06:34:38.356334+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Antiferromagnetic opto-spintronics,

    P. Nˇ emec, M. Fiebig, T. Kampfrath, and A. V. Kimel, “Antiferromagnetic opto-spintronics,” Nat. Phys.14, 229 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Antiferromagnetic spintronics,

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, “Antiferromagnetic spintronics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Antiferromagnetic spintronics,

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, “Antiferromagnetic spintronics,” Nat. Nanotech.11, 231 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Co- herent antiferromagnetic spintronics,

    J. Han, R. Cheng, L. Liu, H. Ohno, and S. Fukami, “Co- herent antiferromagnetic spintronics,” Nat. Mater.22, 684 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    Spin pump- 9 ing and spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnets,

    R. Cheng, J. Xiao, Q. Niu, and A. Brataas, “Spin pump- 9 ing and spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 057601 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Spin pumping of an easy-plane antiferromagnet enhanced by dzyaloshinskii–moriya in- teraction,

    H. Wang, Y. Xiao, M. Guo, E. Lee-Wong, G. Q. Yan, R. Cheng, and C. R. Du, “Spin pumping of an easy-plane antiferromagnet enhanced by dzyaloshinskii–moriya in- teraction,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 117202 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Spin pumping and in- verse spin hall voltages from dynamical antiferromag- nets,

    Ø. Johansen and A. Brataas, “Spin pumping and in- verse spin hall voltages from dynamical antiferromag- nets,” Phys. Rev. B95, 220408 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Spin-orbit torque switching of N\'eel order in band-inverted antiferromagnetic bilayer MnBi$_2$Te$_4$

    R. Islam, S. Ahmad, and F. Xue, “Spin-orbit torque con- trol of topology in intrinsic antiferromagnetic insulators,” (2025), arXiv:2509.01810 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Electrical 180 ◦ switch- ing of n´ eel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet,

    L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai,et al., “Electrical 180 ◦ switch- ing of n´ eel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet,” Sci. Adv.10, eadn0479 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Electri- cal switching of altermagnetism,

    Y. Chen, X. Liu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, “Electri- cal switching of altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 016701 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Pi- cosecond electric-field-induced switching of antiferromag- nets,

    V. Lopez-Dominguez, H. Almasi, and P. K. Amiri, “Pi- cosecond electric-field-induced switching of antiferromag- nets,” Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 024019 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Effects of filling, strain, and electric field on the n´ eel vector in antiferro- magnetic crsb,

    I. J. Park, S. Kwon, and R. K. Lake, “Effects of filling, strain, and electric field on the n´ eel vector in antiferro- magnetic crsb,” Phys. Rev. B102, 224426 (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    Out-of-plane edelstein effects: Electric field induced magnetization inp-wave magnets,

    M. Ezawa, “Out-of-plane edelstein effects: Electric field induced magnetization inp-wave magnets,” Phys. Rev. B111, L161301 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Spin pump- ing and spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnets,

    R. Cheng, J. Xiao, Q. Niu, and A. Brataas, “Spin pump- ing and spin-transfer torques in antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 057601 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Subtera- hertz spin pumping from an insulating antiferromagnet,

    P. Vaidya, S. Morley, J. Tol, Y. Liu, R. Cheng, A. Brataas, D. Lederman, and E. Del Barco, “Subtera- hertz spin pumping from an insulating antiferromagnet,” Science368, 160–165 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Tunable dy- namical magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagnetic topo- logical insulator mnbi2te4 films,

    T. Zhu, H. Wang, H. Zhang, and D. Xing, “Tunable dy- namical magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagnetic topo- logical insulator mnbi2te4 films,” npj Comput. Mater.7 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Large spin-orbit torque efficiency enhanced by magnetic structure of collinear an- tiferromagnet irmn,

    J. Zhou, X. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Yu, H. Fu, L. Liu, S. Chen, J. Deng, W. Lin, X. Shu,et al., “Large spin-orbit torque efficiency enhanced by magnetic structure of collinear an- tiferromagnet irmn,” Sci. Adv.5, eaau6696 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    Quantifying spin-orbit torques in antiferromagnet–heavy-metal het- erostructures,

    E. Cogulu, H. Zhang, N. N. Statuto, Y. Cheng, F. Yang, R. Cheng, and A. D. Kent, “Quantifying spin-orbit torques in antiferromagnet–heavy-metal het- erostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 247204 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,” Phys. Rev. B47, 558–561 (1993)

    1993

  20. [20]

    Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,” Phys. Rev. B54, 11169–11186 (1996)

    1996

  21. [21]

    Projector augmented-wave method,

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” Phys. Rev. B50, 17953–17979 (1994)

    1994

  22. [22]

    Generalized gradient approximation made simple,

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  23. [23]

    Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces,

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vy- drov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, “Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  24. [24]

    Special points for brillouin-zone integrations,

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, “Special points for brillouin-zone integrations,” Phys. Rev. B13, 5188–5192 (1976)

    1976

  25. [25]

    An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions,

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, “An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions,” Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 2309– 2310 (2014)

    2014

  26. [26]

    Current-induced torques in the presence of spin-orbit coupling,

    P. M. Haney and M. D. Stiles, “Current-induced torques in the presence of spin-orbit coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 126602 (2010)

    2010

  27. [27]

    First-principles study of the angular dependence of the spin-orbit torque in pt/co and pd/co bilayers,

    F. Mahfouzi and N. Kioussis, “First-principles study of the angular dependence of the spin-orbit torque in pt/co and pd/co bilayers,” Phys. Rev. B97, 224426 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    Spin-orbit torques in co/pt(111) and mn/w(001) magnetic bilayers from first principles,

    F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, “Spin-orbit torques in co/pt(111) and mn/w(001) magnetic bilayers from first principles,” Phys. Rev. B90, 174423 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    Fully relativistic description of spin-orbit torques by means of linear response theory,

    S. Wimmer, K. Chadova, M. Seemann, D. K¨ odderitzsch, and H. Ebert, “Fully relativistic description of spin-orbit torques by means of linear response theory,” Phys. Rev. B94, 054415 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    First-principles calculation of spin-orbit torque in a co/pt bilayer,

    K. D. Belashchenko, A. A. Kovalev, and M. van Schilf- gaarde, “First-principles calculation of spin-orbit torque in a co/pt bilayer,” Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 011401 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    Spin-orbit torques inl1 0 −FePt/Pt thin films driven by electrical and thermal currents,

    G. G´ eranton, F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, “Spin-orbit torques inl1 0 −FePt/Pt thin films driven by electrical and thermal currents,” Phys. Rev. B91, 014417 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    Gilbert damping in mag- netic multilayers,

    E. ˇSim´ anek and B. Heinrich, “Gilbert damping in mag- netic multilayers,” Phys. Rev. B67, 144418 (2003)

    2003

  33. [33]

    Ferromagnetic resonance relaxation in ultra- thin metal films: The role of the conduction electrons,

    D. L. Mills, “Ferromagnetic resonance relaxation in ultra- thin metal films: The role of the conduction electrons,” Phys. Rev. B68, 014419 (2003)

    2003

  34. [34]

    Orbital pumping by magnetization dy- namics in ferromagnets,

    D. Go, K. Ando, A. Pezo, S. Bl¨ ugel, A. Manchon, and Y. Mokrousov, “Orbital pumping by magnetization dy- namics in ferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. B111, L140409 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Ballistic and shift currents in the bulk photovoltaic effect theory,

    B. I. Sturman, “Ballistic and shift currents in the bulk photovoltaic effect theory,” Phys.Usp.63, 407–411 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    Theory of the bulk photo- voltaic effect in pure crystals,

    R. von Baltz and W. Kraut, “Theory of the bulk photo- voltaic effect in pure crystals,” Phys. Rev. B23, 5590– 5596 (1981)

    1981

  37. [37]

    Recent progress in the theory of bulk photovoltaic effect,

    Z. Dai and A. M. Rappe, “Recent progress in the theory of bulk photovoltaic effect,” Chem. Phys. Rev.4, 011303 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Valley contrast- ing bulk photovoltaic effect in aPT-symmetric MnPSe 3 monolayer,

    Q. Xue, X. Mu, Y. Sun, and J. Zhou, “Valley contrast- ing bulk photovoltaic effect in aPT-symmetric MnPSe 3 monolayer,” Phys. Rev. B107, 245404 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Direct and inverse spin-orbit torques,

    F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, “Direct and inverse spin-orbit torques,” Phys. Rev. B92, 064415 (2015)

    2015

  40. [40]

    [41, 42]

    See Supplemental Material for details on the symmetry consideration, and additional simulation results that in- cludes Refs. [41, 42]

  41. [41]

    Prediction of low-z collinear and noncollinear antiferro- magnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling,

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, “Prediction of low-z collinear and noncollinear antiferro- magnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling,” Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014409 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Electric control of dirac quasiparticles by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet,

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. ˇZelezn´ y, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Electric control of dirac quasiparticles by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 106402 (2017)

    2017

  43. [43]

    Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism,

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism,” Phys. Rev. X12, 10 040501 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    Beyond con- ventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation sym- metry,

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Beyond con- ventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation sym- metry,” Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Contrasting light-induced spin torque in antiferromagnetic and altermagnetic systems,

    J. Zhou and C. Zhang, “Contrasting light-induced spin torque in antiferromagnetic and altermagnetic systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 176902 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    R. R. Birss, ed.,Symmetry and Magnetism(North- Holland Publishing Company, 1964)

    1964

  47. [47]

    Electrically and magnetically switchable nonlinear photocurrent inPT-symmetric magnetic topological quantum materials,

    H. Wang and X. Qian, “Electrically and magnetically switchable nonlinear photocurrent inPT-symmetric magnetic topological quantum materials,” npj Comput. Mater.6, 199 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer,

    A. A. Burkov and L. Balents, “Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 127205 (2011)

    2011

  49. [49]

    Hexagonal warping effects in the surface states of the topological insulator bi 2te3,

    L. Fu, “Hexagonal warping effects in the surface states of the topological insulator bi 2te3,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 266801 (2009)

    2009

  50. [50]

    Magnetized topological insulator multilayers,

    C. Lei, S. Chen, and A. H. MacDonald, “Magnetized topological insulator multilayers,” Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences117, 27224–27230 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    Stacking-dependent elec- tronic and topological properties in van der waals anti- ferromagnet mnbi2te4 films,

    J. Li, Q. Wu, and Weng H., “Stacking-dependent elec- tronic and topological properties in van der waals anti- ferromagnet mnbi2te4 films,” npj Comput. Mater.11, 44 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Electric polarization reversal and memory in a multiferroic material induced by magnetic fields,

    N. Hur, S. Park, P. A. Sharma, J. S. Ahn, S. Guha, and S.-W. Cheong, “Electric polarization reversal and memory in a multiferroic material induced by magnetic fields,” Nature429, 392 (2004)

    2004

  53. [53]

    Spin-orbit coupling and ion displacements in multiferroic tbmno 3,

    H. J. Xiang, S.-H. Wei, M.-H. Whangbo, and J. L. F. Da Silva, “Spin-orbit coupling and ion displacements in multiferroic tbmno 3,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 037209 (2008)

    2008

  54. [54]

    First-principles approach to lattice-mediated magnetoelectric effects,

    J. ´I˜ niguez, “First-principles approach to lattice-mediated magnetoelectric effects,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 117201 (2008)

    2008

  55. [55]

    Induced magnetoelectric response inpnmaperovskites,

    E. Bousquet and N. Spaldin, “Induced magnetoelectric response inpnmaperovskites,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 197603 (2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    Dynamical magnetic charges and linear magnetoelectricity,

    M. Ye and D. Vanderbilt, “Dynamical magnetic charges and linear magnetoelectricity,” Phys. Rev. B89, 064301 (2014)

    2014

  57. [57]

    Giant magnetoelectric effects achieved by tuning spin cone symmetry in y-type hexaferrites,

    K. Zhai, Y. Wu, S. Shen, W. Tian, H. Cao, Y. Chai, B. C. Chakoumakos, D. Shang, L. Yan, F. Wang, and Y. Sun, “Giant magnetoelectric effects achieved by tuning spin cone symmetry in y-type hexaferrites,” Nat. Commun. 8, 159 (2017)

    2017

  58. [58]

    Bulk rashba ef- fect in multiferroics: A theoretical prediction for bicoo3,

    K. Yamauchi, P. Barone, and S. Picozzi, “Bulk rashba ef- fect in multiferroics: A theoretical prediction for bicoo3,” Phys. Rev. B100, 245115 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    Temporary formation of highly con- ducting domain walls for non-destructive read-out of fer- roelectric domain-wall resistance switching memories,

    J. Jiang, Z. L. Bai, Z. H. Chen, L. He, D. W. Zhang, Q. H. Zhang, J. A. Shi, M. H. Park, J. F. Scott, C. S. Hwang, and A. Q. Jiang, “Temporary formation of highly con- ducting domain walls for non-destructive read-out of fer- roelectric domain-wall resistance switching memories,” Nat. Mater.17, 49 (2018)

    2018

  60. [60]

    Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices,

    A. Eckardt, “Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    2017

  61. [61]

    Solution of the schr¨ odinger equation with a hamiltonian periodic in time,

    J. H. Shirley, “Solution of the schr¨ odinger equation with a hamiltonian periodic in time,” Phys. Rev.138, B979– B987 (1965)

    1965

  62. [62]

    Steady states and quasienergies of a quantum-mechanical system in an oscillating field,

    H. Sambe, “Steady states and quasienergies of a quantum-mechanical system in an oscillating field,” Phys. Rev. A7, 2203–2213 (1973)

    1973

  63. [63]

    Dynamic localization of a charged particle moving under the influence of an electric field,

    D. H. Dunlap and V. M. Kenkre, “Dynamic localization of a charged particle moving under the influence of an electric field,” Phys. Rev. B34, 3625–3633 (1986)

    1986

  64. [64]

    Perspective: Floquet engineering topological states from effective models towards realistic materials,

    F. Zhan, R. Chen, Z. Ning, D.-S. Ma, Z. Wang, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, “Perspective: Floquet engineering topological states from effective models towards realistic materials,” Quantum Front.3, 21 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    Light-induced topological phase transition with tunable layer Hall effect in axion antifer- romagnets,

    C. Zhou and J. Zhou, “Light-induced topological phase transition with tunable layer Hall effect in axion antifer- romagnets,” Nano Lett.24, 7311 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Orbi- tronics: The intrinsic orbital current inp-doped silicon,

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, “Orbi- tronics: The intrinsic orbital current inp-doped silicon,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 066601 (2005)

    2005

  67. [67]

    Spintronics meets orbitronics: Emergence of orbital angular momen- tum in solids,

    D. Jo, D. Go, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, “Spintronics meets orbitronics: Emergence of orbital angular momen- tum in solids,” npj Spintronics2, 19 (2024)

    2024

  68. [68]

    Disentangling or- bital and valley hall effects in bilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides,

    T. P. Cysne, M. Costa, L. M. Canonico, M. B. Nardelli, R. B. Muniz, and T. G. Rappoport, “Disentangling or- bital and valley hall effects in bilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 056601 (2021)

    2021

  69. [69]

    Long- range orbital torque by momentum-space hotspots,

    D. Go, D. Jo, K.-W. Kim, S. Lee, M.-G. Kang, B.-G. Park, S. Bl¨ ugel, H.-W. Lee, and Y. Mokrousov, “Long- range orbital torque by momentum-space hotspots,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 246701 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Orbital pumping incorporating both orbital angular momentum and position,

    S. Han, H.-W. Ko, J. H. Oh, H.-W. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and K.-W. Kim, “Orbital pumping incorporating both orbital angular momentum and position,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 036305 (2025)

    2025

  71. [71]

    Theory of current-induced angular mo- mentum transfer dynamics in spin-orbit coupled sys- tems,

    D. Go, F. Freimuth, J.-P. Hanke, F. Xue, O. Gomonay, K.-J. Lee, S. Bl¨ ugel, P. M. Haney, H.-W. Lee, and Y. Mokrousov, “Theory of current-induced angular mo- mentum transfer dynamics in spin-orbit coupled sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. Research2, 033401 (2020)

    2020

  72. [72]

    Valley-dependent giant orbital mo- ments and transport features in rhombohedral graphene multilayers,

    X. Mu and J. Zhou, “Valley-dependent giant orbital mo- ments and transport features in rhombohedral graphene multilayers,” Phys. Rev. B111, 165102 (2025)

    2025