Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

Timelike entanglement entropy with gravitational anomalies

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a timelike interval in a CFT with a gravitational anomaly, the timelike entanglement entropy is $S_T=\frac{c_L+c_R}{6}\log(T/\epsilon)+\frac{i\pi c_R}{6}$, and topologically massive gravity in AdS$_3$ reproduces the same formula…

desk verdict The paper's new timelike-geodesic Chern-Simons machinery is worth taking seriously, but the central c_R claim is not derived — it is selected by a branch choice at eq. (3.3) that is inconsistent with the paper's own z=x−t convention. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19694 v2 pith:BSPU67TR submitted 2025-04-28 hep-th

Chong-Sun Chu , Himanshu Parihar This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords timelikeentanglemententropygravitationalanomalychiralconformalfieldtheorytopologicallymassivegravityAdS3/CFTcorrespondenceChern-SimonstermholographicBTZblackhole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that timelike entanglement entropy (TEE) in a two-dimensional conformal field theory with a gravitational anomaly is chiral in its imaginary part: for a pure timelike interval of length $T$, the entropy is $S_T=\frac{c_L+c_R}{6}\log(T/\epsilon)+\frac{i\pi c_R}{6}$, so the real part sees both left and right central charges while the imaginary part sees only $c_R$. This asymmetry is new relative to the known non-anomalous TEE and gives a direct way to detect a gravitational anomaly in a chiral CFT. The same result is derived on the gravity side from topologically massive gravity in AdS$_3$, where the Chern-Simons term contributes the rotation of normal frames along a timelike geodesic. The authors obtain exact agreement between field theory and holography at zero temperature, at finite temperature with angular potential, and for the extremal finite-angular-momentum case. If the claim is correct, the imaginary part of TEE becomes a diagnostic of chirality rather than merely a formal continuation artifact.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the normal frame attached to the bulk geodesic. In TMG-AdS$_3$ the holographic entanglement entropy is not just a geodesic length: the gravitational Chern-Simons term contributes the on-shell action of a massive spinning particle, which reduces to a boundary term measuring how the normal frame twists or rotates along the curve. For spacelike geodesics this is a Lorentz boost of one timelike and one spacelike normal vector; for timelike geodesics both normals are spacelike and the transport is an $SO(2)$ rotation, giving $S_{\rm anom}^{\rm timelike}=\frac{i}{4G_N\mu}(\theta_f-\theta_i)$. The paper's new step is a boundary-condition prescription (eqs. 4.28--4.35) that fixes the normal vectors at the null-infinity junctions between the spacelike and timelike geodesics using the boundary time direction. That prescription is what makes the spacelike anomaly vanish and the timelike anomaly equal $i\pi/(4G_N\mu)$, producing the holographic formula that matches field theory.

What would settle it

Compute the TEE for the same chiral CFT by a method that does not use the normal-frame boundary prescription, for example a complexified-extremal-surface calculation, a direct pseudo-entropy computation for a free chiral CFT with $c_L\neq c_R$, or a lattice simulation of 'entanglement in time' on a chiral edge. If the imaginary part is not exactly $\frac{c_R}{6}\pi$ at zero temperature, or if the holographic timelike anomaly contribution is not $i\pi/(4G_N\mu)$ under an equally natural matching condition, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that analytic continuation of the spacelike entanglement entropy to a timelike interval does not just add the universal term $\frac{c_L+c_R}{12}i\pi$: with $c_L\neq c_R$ a second, anomaly term $-\frac{c_L-c_R}{12}i\pi$ partially cancels it, leaving $\frac{c_R}{6}i\pi$. Holographically, the paper derives the same coefficient by evaluating the on-shell action of a massive spinning particle on the combined spacelike-plus-timelike extremal curves in TMG-AdS$_3$. The Chern-Simons contribution from the spacelike pieces vanishes for a pure timelike interval, while the timelike piece contributes $i\pi/(4G_N\mu)$, a finite, interval-length-independent rotation of the normal frame. Summing this with the geodesic lengths and using the TMG central charges $c_L=\frac{3\ell}{2G_N}(1-\frac{1}{\mu\ell})$ and $c_R=\frac{3\ell}{2G_N}(1+\frac{1}{\mu\ell})$ reproduces the field-theoretic formula in all three thermodynamic settings examined.

Load-bearing premise

The holographic derivation rests on an underived rule for fixing the normal-frame vectors where the spacelike and timelike geodesics meet at null infinity; if a different natural choice changed the imaginary contribution, the exact match with the field-theory result would break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a pure timelike interval in an anomalous CFT$_2$, the imaginary part of TEE is $\frac{c_R}{6}\pi$, independent of interval length and of $c_L$; measuring this coefficient gives a direct read on the gravitational anomaly.
  • The holographic TEE in TMG-AdS$_3$ matches the field-theoretic result in three regimes (vacuum, finite temperature with angular potential, and extremal finite angular momentum), validating the normal-frame prescription against analytic continuation.
  • Setting $c_L=c_R=c$ recovers the standard timelike entanglement entropy $\frac{c}{3}\log(T/\epsilon)+\frac{i\pi c}{6}$, so the anomaly result contains the known case as a limit.
  • The left-moving modes contribute only to the real part of TEE for a pure timelike interval; the imaginary part receives no contribution from $c_L$ at all.
  • The anomalous imaginary contribution does not depend on $T$; it is a universal constant shift for all timelike intervals in a given theory, unlike the logarithmic real part.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the imaginary part of TEE is a direct chirality meter, a numerical or condensed-matter probe of timelike correlations in a chiral edge state, using the recently proposed 'entanglement in time' quantity, could test the $c_R/6$ coefficient without invoking holography.
  • Beyond the paper: the interval-length-independent $i\pi/(4G_N\mu)$ from the timelike geodesic has the form of a topological framing term; one might expect it to equal a Berry phase for the normal frame and to be robust under smooth deformations of the timelike curve, a property that could be checked directly in the bulk.
  • Beyond the paper: replacing the normal-frame matching prescription with another natural condition would change how the anomaly contribution splits between spacelike and timelike geodesics; the paper's agreement with field theory singles out its prescription, so deriving that boundary condition from a variational principle would close the main gap.
  • Beyond the paper: in backgrounds that are not locally AdS$_3$, such as warped AdS or Lifshitz spacetimes, the timelike anomaly term may acquire $T$-dependence because the normal-frame rotation would no longer be purely topological; the paper's methods give a concrete route to compute it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies timelike entanglement entropy (TEE) in two-dimensional CFTs with unequal left and right central charges, i.e., with gravitational anomalies. In the field-theoretic part, the authors analytically continue the known spacelike-interval entanglement entropy to a pure timelike interval in three settings: zero temperature, finite temperature with angular potential, and zero temperature with finite angular potential. They obtain complex-valued results whose real part depends on c_L+c_R and whose imaginary part is claimed to depend on a single central charge, specifically c_R. In the holographic part, the paper extends the Castro et al. framework for TMG-AdS3/CFT2 by deriving the Chern-Simons contribution from timelike geodesics as a rotation of the normal frame, prescribing boundary conditions for the normal vectors at null infinity, and matching the resulting holographic TEE with the field-theory answers in the three cases.

Significance. If the central claim held, the chiral sensitivity of the imaginary part of TEE would be a genuinely useful diagnostic: it would show that the timelike entanglement entropy can probe the sign and magnitude of the gravitational anomaly coefficient c_L-c_R. The derivation of the timelike-geodesic Chern-Simons contribution is a useful technical extension of [4], and the paper is careful in several places: the parametrizations (4.27) and (4.33) are explicit, the reduction to the known non-anomalous TEE in the c_L=c_R limit is correctly implemented, and the holographic computation uses the established TMG central charge formula (4.3) without fitting parameters. However, the main physical claim is currently not established as stated because the chirality of the imaginary part is fixed by an unstated branch choice, and there is an internal inconsistency in the finite-temperature holographic equations. For this reason the significance is conditional until those points are resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.5)] The claimed imaginary part iπ c_R/6 is fixed by an unstated branch choice rather than by the gravitational anomaly. With the paper's own conventions z=x-t, \bar z=x+t, and t_{12}=T>0, a pure timelike interval has z_{12}=-T and \bar z_{12}=T, so the direct continuation of the twist correlator (2.4), equivalently of (2.5), gives S_T^A=(c_L+c_R)/6 log(T/ε)+iπ c_L/6. The value tanh^{-1}(t_{12}/x_{12})=+(1/2)log(-1)=+iπ/2 adopted in footnote 2 corresponds to the opposite sign of log(\bar z_{12}/z_{12}) and therefore to a branch that effectively reverses the sign of t_{12}. Since the holographic normal-frame prescription in Sec. 4.3 is matched to this same branch, the bulk computations in (4.38), (4.51), and (4.57) do not independently select c_R over c_L. The authors should either derive the branch from a stated physical definition of TEE, such as a specified continuation path in z and \bar z or an explicit time-orientation convention, or acknowledge that the c_L versus c_R assignment is convention-dependent; in the latter case the proposal to use the imaginary part as a probe of the gravitational anomaly must be re-evaluated.
  2. [Sec. 4.4, Eqs. (4.50)-(4.51)] As printed, Eq. (4.51) does not follow from Eq. (4.50). Eq. (4.50) gives S_anom = (1/(4G_N μ)) log[(sinh(πT/β_R)/β_R)/(sinh(πT/β_L)/β_L)] + iπ/(4G_N μ), which, using 1/(4G_N μ)=-(c_L-c_R)/12, equals -(c_L-c_R)/12 log[(β_L sinh(πT/β_R))/(β_R sinh(πT/β_L))] plus the imaginary term. The second line of Eq. (4.51), however, contains log[(β_R sinh(πT/β_R))/(β_L sinh(πT/β_L))]; the β_L and β_R factors are interchanged. One of the two equations must be corrected. As written, the claimed exact match with the field-theory result (3.7) is not established.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.28)-(4.35)] The boundary-condition prescription for the normal frame is a free input. The values S_spacelike_anom=0 in (4.30) and S_timelike_anom=iπ/(4G_N μ) in (4.36) are obtained only for the specific matching rule proposed in this section, and the paper does not derive that rule from the TMG action or from a covariant boundary-value problem. Because the field-theory branch is not fixed by the calculation (see the first major comment), the agreement with (3.5) cannot serve as an independent check of this prescription. The authors should present a derivation of the prescription or, failing that, test its robustness under changes of the regularization (such as the large-β cutoff) and under alternative matching conventions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5, first paragraph] The summary states that the TEE receives an additional purely imaginary contribution from the gravitational anomaly, but at finite temperature and angular potential, Eq. (3.7) shows an anomaly-dependent contribution to the real part as well; the wording should be adjusted.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, footnote 2] The notation tanh^{-1}∞ is imprecise because the function is not defined at infinity and the value depends on the direction of approach; the limit x_{12}→0 with its branch should be written explicitly.
  3. [Eq. (4.50)] The stacked fraction in Eq. (4.50) is ambiguous in the printed form; using explicit bracketed ratios would make the ordering of β_L and β_R factors clearer.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption notes that n_i and n_f are timelike for the spacelike geodesics; a brief sentence on the orientation convention for the triad (v,n,\tilde n) would help the reader follow the matching rules in Sec. 4.3.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The c_R-only imaginary part of the TEE is fixed by the branch/limit convention at Eq. (3.3), and the holographic boundary conditions are then chosen to reproduce the same convention; the central chiral-asymmetry claim is therefore an artifact of that choice rather than a derived prediction.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.1, footnote 2 / Eq. (3.3), applied in Eqs. (3.4)-(3.5b)]
    "Since for a pure timelike interval t12/x12 →∞ as x12→0+ and t12>0, one obtain from (3.2) tanh−1∞ = 1/2 log(−1). (3.3) ... We will consider the principal value of log from now on, then the timelike entanglement entropy in the presence of anomaly for a pure timelike interval is given by ... = cL+cR/6 logT/ϵ + cR/6 iπ. (3.5b)"

    With the paper's own starting formula (2.5) and its convention z=x−t, bar z=x+t, a pure timelike interval of length T has z12=z2−z1=−T and bar z12=T (because t2−t1=T), so under the same principal branch (2.5) gives an imaginary part +iπ cL/6, not +iπ cR/6. The +iπ/2 assigned to tanh−1∞ in (3.3) corresponds to x12→0+ and effectively replaces the interval by its time reverse (z12=T, bar z12=−T); taking x12→0− would give −iπ/2 and iπ cL/6. Thus the claimed cR-only imaginary part is inserted by the branch/limit convention at (3.3), not derived from the gravitational anomaly.

  2. other [Section 4.3, Eqs. (4.34)-(4.36)]
    "Given that the timelike geodesic matches up with the spacelike geodesics I, II asymptotically at the null infinities, we propose to specify the initial and final normal vectors n1,n2 by matching them up with the normal vectors ni and nf at the respective null infinities. ... n1μ = ℓ/u−∞(sinhγ,0,coshγ), ... n2μ = ℓ/u∞(−sinhγ,0,−coshγ) ... we obtain the anomalous contribution from timelike geodesic as Stimelike anom = ... = 1/(4G_N μ) iπ. (4.36)"

    The sign of the iπ in (4.36) is fixed by the proposed, not derived, matching conditions (4.34)-(4.35). Reversing the orientation of either normal vector flips the sign of (4.36), which changes the final imaginary part in (4.38) from cR/6 iπ to cL/6 iπ. The proposal is calibrated to reproduce the same field-theory branch selected at (3.3), so the exact holographic match is a consistency check of that convention rather than an independent derivation of the chiral asymmetry.

full rationale

The field-theory computation is self-contained and does not fit any parameter to the target result: it starts from the standard twist-correlator formula (2.5) and the known anomalous-cft expressions (2.6), (2.13), (2.16). The holographic computation likewise uses the established TMG central-charge relation (4.3) and the Castro et al. action [4]; no free parameter is tuned to the boundary result. Self-citations, mainly [28] for the spacelike-plus-timelike geodesic construction, are not load-bearing enough to be circular. However, the central physical claim—that the imaginary part of the pure-timelike TEE depends only on cR—is not robustly derived: Eq. (3.3) fixes the sign of tanh−1∞ by choosing x12→0+, and the same starting formula (2.5) with the same principal branch yields iπ cL/6 when the interval is labeled in the paper's own t2−t1=T convention. The opposite limit gives the opposite chirality. The holographic boundary conditions in section 4.3 are then proposed so that the timelike Chern-Simons term produces the same sign of iπ/(4G_N μ), making the bulk-boundary agreement a check of the chosen branch rather than an independent confirmation. I therefore score 6: one central 'prediction' reduces, at least in part, to the continuation/boundary convention, while the real parts and much of the finite-temperature structure retain independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the TMG/CFT dictionary (central charges eq. 4.3), the spinning particle action (4.4) from [4], the analytic continuation convention for TEE, and the new boundary condition prescription for normal frames. No free parameter is fitted to data; all constants are inputs from prior literature.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Holographic TEE is the sum of on-shell actions of massive spinning particles on spacelike and timelike extremal worldlines (eq. 4.23).
    Extension of proposals in [22,23,28] to TMG; not derived from first principles in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Boundary condition prescription for normal vectors at null infinity, matching spacelike and timelike geodesic frames (eqs. 4.28-4.35).
    Proposed by the authors to fix the non-covariant bulk CS contribution; correctness is established only by the final match with field theory.
  • standard math Principal branch of log(-1) = i pi in the analytic continuation (section 3.1).
    Consistent with [22,23]; other branches shift the imaginary part by multiples of 2 pi i but preserve the cR dependence.
  • standard math TMG Brown-Henneaux central charges cL = 3 ell/(2G)(1 - 1/(mu ell)), cR = 3 ell/(2G)(1 + 1/(mu ell)) (eq. 4.3).
    Established result from prior literature [71,72]; used to translate bulk parameters into boundary central charges.
  • domain assumption On-shell action (4.4) for a spinning particle in TMG, with the anomaly contribution given by the normal frame twist or rotation.
    Borrowed from Castro et al. [4]; the timelike version (4.16) is derived in this paper but relies on the same action.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Timelike entanglement entropy with gravitational anomalies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BSPU67TR

@misc{pith2026250419694,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Timelike entanglement entropy with gravitational anomalies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BSPU67TR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19694}
}
abstract

We study the timelike entanglement entropy (TEE) in two dimensional conformal field theories (CFT) with gravitational anomalies. We employ analytical continuation to compute the timelike entanglement entropy for a pure timelike interval in such CFTs. We find that, unlike the real part, the imaginary part of the TEE displays an asymmetric dependence on the central charges of the left and right moving modes. We propose that the asymmetric dependence on central charges of the imaginary part of the TEE can be used to probe the presence of gravitational anomalies in chiral CFT. Furthermore, we propose a holographic construction to obtain the timelike entanglement entropy from the bulk dual geometries involving topologically massive gravity in AdS$_3$. The holographic results obtained match exactly with the dual field theory results.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Temporal Entanglement from Twist Correlators in 2d Conformal Field Theory and Holography

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Timelike entanglement entropy in 2d CFT is defined by time-ordered twist correlators, whose holographic saddles are complex geodesics with smallest real length, and whose imaginary part counts causal-diamond crossings...

  2. Linear Growth of Holographic Time-like Entanglement Entropy and Kasner exponents

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Late-time TEE growth in asymptotically AdS black holes with space-like singularities is governed by a critical extremal surface inside the horizon, with real/imaginary growth rates bounded by Schwarzschild-AdS under e...

  3. Probe Dependence of the Imaginary Part of HTEE

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a strongly coupled anisotropic plasma, the imaginary part of holographic timelike entanglement entropy is orientation-dependent: 29π/48 a² for the surface probing the anisotropic direction, 11π/48 a² for the other.

  4. Holographic timelike complexity for de Sitter

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Timelike subregion volume complexity in de Sitter grows exponentially early and diverges hyperfast at a maximal duration; near the SdS black hole horizon the divergence is replaced by slower, claimed-nonlinear growth.

  5. Holographic Timelike Entanglement and Subregion Complexity in Localized AdS3*S3*T4 Black Holes

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Timelike entanglement and subregion complexity detect the cap–horizon transition of localized AdS3×S3×T4 black poles via fixed-boundary-interval Lorentzian branch selection, effects absent in BTZ and large-r limits.

  6. Holographic Timelike c-function

    hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A holographic c-function derived from timelike entanglement entropy is shown to be monotonic along RG flows in Poincare invariant, Lifshitz, and hyperscaling-violating theories, given null energy and thermodynamic sta...

  7. Renormalized pseudoentropy in dS/CFT

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Renormalized holographic pseudoentropy in dS/CFT is constructed from conformal-gravity actions in four and six dimensions, yielding finite sphere values and Mezei-like shape dependence for small deformations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [43]

    He and H.-Q

    P.-Z. He and H.-Q. Zhang, Holographic timelike entanglement entropy from Rindler method*, Chin. Phys. C 48 (2024) 115113 [ 2307.09803]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [11]

    Q. Wen, M. Xu and H. Zhong, Timelike and gravitational anomalous entanglement from the inner horizon, 2412.21058

    arXiv

  3. [4]

    Castro, S

    A. Castro, S. Detournay, N. Iqbal and E. Perlmutter, Holographic entanglement entropy and gravitational anomalies, JHEP 07 (2014) 114 [ 1405.2792]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [1]

    Calabrese and J.L

    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [ hep-th/0405152]

    arXiv 2004

  5. [2]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504005 [ 0905.4013]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [3]

    Alvarez-Gaume and E

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, Gravitational Anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 269

    1984

  7. [5]

    Revisit the entanglement entropy with gravitational anomaly

    P.-Z. He and H.-Q. Zhang, Revisit the entanglement entropy with gravitational anomaly, JHEP 11 (2023) 142 [ 2305.05892]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  8. [6]

    D. Basu, H. Parihar, V. Raj and G. Sengupta, Entanglement negativity, reflected entropy, and anomalous gravitation, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 086013 [ 2202.00683]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 77 references
  1. [7]

    Wen and H

    Q. Wen and H. Zhong, Covariant entanglement wedge cross-section, balanced partial entanglement and gravitational anomalies, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 056 [ 2205.10858]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 181602 [ hep-th/0603001]

    2006 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [ hep-th/0605073]

    2006 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Jiang, Anomalous Gravitation and its Positivity from Entanglement, JHEP 10 (2019) 283 [1906.04142]

    H. Jiang, Anomalous Gravitation and its Positivity from Entanglement, JHEP 10 (2019) 283 [1906.04142]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Kraus and F

    P. Kraus and F. Larsen, Holographic gravitational anomalies, JHEP 01 (2006) 022 [hep-th/0508218]

    2006 arXiv

  6. [13]

    W. Song, Q. Wen and J. Xu, Modifications to Holographic Entanglement Entropy in Warped CFT, JHEP 02 (2017) 067 [ 1610.00727]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Jiang, W

    H. Jiang, W. Song and Q. Wen, Entanglement Entropy in Flat Holography, JHEP 07 (2017) 142 [ 1706.07552]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Hijano and C

    E. Hijano and C. Rabideau, Holographic entanglement and Poincaré blocks in three-dimensional flat space, JHEP 05 (2018) 068 [ 1712.07131]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Wen, Towards the generalized gravitational entropy for spacetimes with non-Lorentz invariant duals, JHEP 01 (2019) 220 [ 1810.11756]

    Q. Wen, Towards the generalized gravitational entropy for spacetimes with non-Lorentz invariant duals, JHEP 01 (2019) 220 [ 1810.11756]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Gao and J

    B. Gao and J. Xu, Holographic entanglement entropy in AdS3/WCFT, Phys. Lett. B822 (2021) 136647 [ 1912.00562]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Song and J

    W. Song and J. Xu, Structure Constants from Modularity in Warped CFT, JHEP 10 (2019) 211 [ 1903.01346]. – 22 –

    2019 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Sun, Note on Chern-Simons Term Correction to Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 05 (2009) 061 [ 0810.0967]

    J.-R. Sun, Note on Chern-Simons Term Correction to Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 05 (2009) 061 [ 0810.0967]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [20]

    D. Basu, A. Chandra, H. Parihar and G. Sengupta, Entanglement Negativity in Flat Holography, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 074 [ 2102.05685]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Wang and J.-q

    X.-S. Wang and J.-q. Wu, An observable in Classical Pure AdS3 Gravity: the twist along a geodesic, JHEP 05 (2024) 111 [ 2312.10751]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki, Pseudoentropy in dS/CFT and Timelike Entanglement Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 031601 [ 2210.09457]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [23]

    K. Doi, J. Harper, A. Mollabashi, T. Takayanagi and Y. Taki, Timelike entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2023) 052 [ 2302.11695]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Nakata, T

    Y. Nakata, T. Takayanagi, Y. Taki, K. Tamaoka and Z. Wei, New holographic generalization of entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 026005 [ 2005.13801]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Mollabashi, N

    A. Mollabashi, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi, K. Tamaoka and Z. Wei, Pseudo Entropy in Free Quantum Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 081601 [ 2011.09648]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Mollabashi, N

    A. Mollabashi, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi, K. Tamaoka and Z. Wei, Aspects of pseudoentropy in field theories, Phys. Rev. Res.3 (2021) 033254 [ 2106.03118]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Li, Z.-Q

    Z. Li, Z.-Q. Xiao and R.-Q. Yang, On holographic time-like entanglement entropy, JHEP 04 (2023) 004 [ 2211.14883]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Basak, A

    J.K. Basak, A. Chakraborty, C.-S. Chu, D. Giataganas and H. Parihar, Massless Lifshitz field theory for arbitrary z, JHEP 05 (2024) 284 [ 2312.16284]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Afrasiar, J.K

    M. Afrasiar, J.K. Basak and D. Giataganas, Timelike entanglement entropy and phase transitions in non-conformal theories, JHEP 07 (2024) 243 [ 2404.01393]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Afrasiar, J.K

    M. Afrasiar, J.K. Basak and D. Giataganas, Holographic Timelike Entanglement Entropy in Non-relativistic Theories, 2411.18514

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    Heller, F

    M.P. Heller, F. Ori and A. Serantes, Geometric Interpretation of Timelike Entanglement Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 131601 [ 2408.15752]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [32]

    P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, Fix the dual geometries ofT ¯T deformed CFT2 and highly excited states of CFT2, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 1117 [ 1811.07758]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [33]

    B. Liu, H. Chen and B. Lian, Entanglement entropy of free fermions in timelike slices, Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024) 144306 [ 2210.03134]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [34]

    W.-z. Guo, S. He and Y.-X. Zhang, Constructible reality condition of pseudo entropy via pseudo-Hermiticity, JHEP 05 (2023) 021 [ 2209.07308]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Narayan, de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement, Phys

    K. Narayan, de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 126004 [ 2210.12963]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [36]

    S. He, J. Yang, Y.-X. Zhang and Z.-X. Zhao, Pseudoentropy for descendant operators in two-dimensional conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 025014 [ 2301.04891]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Jiang, P

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, Timelike entanglement entropy and TT¯ deformation, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 046004 [ 2302.13872]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Narayan and H.K

    K. Narayan and H.K. Saini, Notes on time entanglement and pseudo-entropy, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 499 [ 2303.01307]. – 23 –

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Chu and H

    C.-S. Chu and H. Parihar, Time-like entanglement entropy in AdS/BCFT, JHEP 06 (2023) 173 [ 2304.10907]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Jiang, P

    X. Jiang, P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, Timelike entanglement entropy in dS3/CFT2, JHEP 08 (2023) 216 [ 2304.10376]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [41]

    S. He, J. Yang, Y.-X. Zhang and Z.-X. Zhao, Pseudo entropy of primary operators in TT/JT-deformed CFTs, JHEP 09 (2023) 025 [ 2305.10984]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [42]

    D. Chen, X. Jiang and H. Yang, Holographic TT¯ deformed entanglement entropy in dS3/CFT2, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 026011 [ 2307.04673]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Narayan, Further remarks on de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement, Phys

    K. Narayan, Further remarks on de Sitter space, extremal surfaces, and time entanglement, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 086009 [ 2310.00320]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Shinmyo, T

    K. Shinmyo, T. Takayanagi and K. Tasuki, Pseudo entropy under joining local quenches, JHEP 02 (2024) 111 [ 2310.12542]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Guo, Y.-z

    W.-z. Guo, Y.-z. Jiang and Y. Jiang, Pseudo entropy and pseudo-Hermiticity in quantum field theories, JHEP 05 (2024) 071 [ 2311.01045]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Diaz, J.M

    N.L. Diaz, J.M. Matera and R. Rossignoli, Spacetime quantum and classical mechanics with dynamical foliation, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 105008 [ 2311.06486]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Kanda, T

    H. Kanda, T. Kawamoto, Y.-k. Suzuki, T. Takayanagi, K. Tasuki and Z. Wei, Entanglement phase transition in holographic pseudo entropy, JHEP 03 (2024) 060 [ 2311.13201]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    He, Y.-X

    S. He, Y.-X. Zhang, L. Zhao and Z.-X. Zhao, Entanglement and pseudo entanglement dynamics versus fusion in CFT, JHEP 06 (2024) 177 [ 2312.02679]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A. Das, S. Sachdeva and D. Sarkar, Bulk reconstruction using timelike entanglement in (A)dS, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 066007 [ 2312.16056]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Grieninger, K

    S. Grieninger, K. Ikeda and D.E. Kharzeev, Temporal entanglement entropy as a probe of renormalization group flow, JHEP 05 (2024) 030 [ 2312.08534]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    W.-z. Guo, S. He and Y.-X. Zhang, Relation between timelike and spacelike entanglement entropy, 2402.00268

  45. [53]

    Basu and V

    D. Basu and V. Raj, Reflected entropy and timelike entanglement in TT¯-deformed CFT2s, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 046009 [ 2402.07253]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Guo, Y.-z

    W.-z. Guo, Y.-z. Jiang and J. Xu, Pseudoentropy sum rule by analytical continuation of the superposition parameter, JHEP 11 (2024) 069 [ 2405.09745]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Anegawa and K

    T. Anegawa and K. Tamaoka, Black hole singularity and timelike entanglement, JHEP 10 (2024) 182 [ 2406.10968]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Goswami, K

    K. Goswami, K. Narayan and G. Yadav, No-boundary extremal surfaces in slow-roll inflation and other cosmologies, JHEP 03 (2025) 193 [ 2409.14208]

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Jena and S

    S.S. Jena and S. Mahapatra, A note on the holographic time-like entanglement entropy in Lifshitz theory, JHEP 01 (2025) 055 [ 2410.00384]

    2025 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Xu and W.-z

    J. Xu and W.-z. Guo, Imaginary part of timelike entanglement entropy, JHEP 02 (2025) 094 [2410.22684]. – 24 –

    2025 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Roychowdhury, Holographic timelike entanglement andc theorem for supersymmetric QFTs in (0 + 1)d, 2502.10797

    D. Roychowdhury, Holographic timelike entanglement andc theorem for supersymmetric QFTs in (0 + 1)d, 2502.10797

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Guo and J

    W.-z. Guo and J. Xu, A duality of Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces inside and outside the horizon, 2502.16774

  53. [61]

    Roychowdhury, Field theory aspects ofη-deformed superstring background, 2503.06294

    D. Roychowdhury, Field theory aspects ofη-deformed superstring background, 2503.06294

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Milekhin, Z

    A. Milekhin, Z. Adamska and J. Preskill, Observable and computable entanglement in time, 2502.12240

  55. [63]

    Alvarez-Gaume and P.H

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and P.H. Ginsparg, The Structure of Gauge and Gravitational Anomalies, Annals Phys. 161 (1985) 423

    1985

  56. [64]

    Bardeen and B

    W.A. Bardeen and B. Zumino, Consistent and Covariant Anomalies in Gauge and Gravitational Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 244 (1984) 421

    1984

  57. [65]

    Hubeny, M

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [ 0705.0016]

    2007 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Caputa, V

    P. Caputa, V. Jejjala and H. Soltanpanahi, Entanglement entropy of extremal BTZ black holes, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 046006 [ 1309.7852]

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Frolov and K.S

    V.P. Frolov and K.S. Thorne, Renormalized stress-energy tensor near the horizon of a slowly evolving, rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D39 (1989) 2125

    1989

  60. [68]

    Tachikawa, Black hole entropy in the presence of Chern-Simons terms, Class

    Y. Tachikawa, Black hole entropy in the presence of Chern-Simons terms, Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) 737 [ hep-th/0611141]

    2007 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Skenderis, M

    K. Skenderis, M. Taylor and B.C. van Rees, Topologically Massive Gravity and the AdS/CFT Correspondence, JHEP 09 (2009) 045 [ 0906.4926]

    2009 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 207

    1986

  63. [71]

    Hotta, Y

    K. Hotta, Y. Hyakutake, T. Kubota and H. Tanida, Brown-Henneaux’s Canonical Approach to Topologically Massive Gravity, JHEP 07 (2008) 066 [ 0805.2005]

    2008 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Compere and S

    G. Compere and S. Detournay, Semi-classical central charge in topologically massive gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.26 (2009) 012001 [ 0808.1911]

    2009 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [1304.4926]

    2013 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Keski-Vakkuri, Bulk and boundary dynamics in BTZ black holes, Phys

    E. Keski-Vakkuri, Bulk and boundary dynamics in BTZ black holes, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 104001 [ hep-th/9808037]

    1999 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Ammon, A

    M. Ammon, A. Castro and N. Iqbal, Wilson Lines and Entanglement Entropy in Higher Spin Gravity, JHEP 10 (2013) 110 [ 1306.4338]

    2013 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Detournay, T

    S. Detournay, T. Hartman and D.M. Hofman, Warped Conformal Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 124018 [ 1210.0539]

    2012 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Chu, I.G

    C.-S. Chu, I.G. Gonzalez and H. Parihar, Holography for boundary Lifshitz field theory, JHEP 11 (2024) 158 [ 2409.06667]. – 25 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.