Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 105 references

Dust-heating constraints on primordial black holes in the 10^15–10^17 g range strengthen dramatically with black hole spin, reaching an upper limit on the dark matter fraction of about 10^-4 for silicate grains.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 00:23 UTC pith:BSSPJBPX

load-bearing objection The spin/profile extension is fine, but Eq. (14)'s perfect absorption assumption is unphysical at MeV energies and the O(10^-4) limits likely evaporate. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15028 v1 pith:BSSPJBPX submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.CO

Refining primordial black hole dark matter constraints with dust heating: the role of spin and halo profile dependence

Shaobin Hu , Yupeng Yang , Chengjie Sun , Zihan Li , Jiafan Sun , Yuzhu Tong , Yankun Qu , Shuangxi Yi This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO PACS 95.35.+d04.70.Dy
keywords primordial black holesdark matterHawking radiationinterstellar dust heatingPBH spinhalo density profilesdust temperature constraintslognormal mass function
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Primordial black holes are a leading dark matter candidate, and those in the 10^15–10^17 g mass range should heat interstellar dust through Hawking radiation. This paper incorporates black hole spin and five different Milky Way dark matter halo profiles into the dust-heating argument, claiming that for rapidly spinning holes the dark matter fraction f_PBH is limited to roughly 10^-4 when silicate grains are considered – the strongest dust-based limit so far. The spin dependence matters because earlier dust-heating studies used non-spinning holes and a single NFW profile. A sympathetic reader would care because this is an independent constraint that, for high spin, can beat the Galactic 511 keV bound below about 6×10^15 g, and wider lognormal mass functions exclude a broader range of massive PBHs as the sole dark matter component.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the equilibrium temperature of interstellar dust can be used to set upper limits on the PBH fraction f_PBH across the mass window 10^15–10^17 g, provided the Hawking photon spectrum is computed with spin and includes secondary photons from hadron and gauge-boson decays. For a fixed halo profile and mass function, higher spin parameters yield stronger limits; the Isothermal profile gives the most stringent bounds, followed by Einasto, then NFW and Moore, with Burkert the weakest. For silicate grains, which cool less efficiently than graphite, the limits reach O(10^-4) for a* = 0.9999. The same ordering holds for monochromatic and lognormal mass fun

What carries the argument

The central object is the sky-averaged heating flux F_PBH from PBH Hawking radiation absorbed by interstellar dust: a multi-dimensional integral over the Milky Way halo density profile rho(r), a uniformly distributed dust population, and the PBH mass function, weighted by the total photon spectrum (primary plus secondary). The constraint is set by the inequality that this heating rate must not exceed the dust's equilibrium infrared cooling rate, computed separately for silicate and graphite MRN grains. The spin parameter a* enters through the Hawking temperature and greybody factors, strongly boosting photon emission at high spin and thereby tightening the f_PBH limits.

Load-bearing premise

The whole constraint rests on assuming interstellar dust is spread uniformly through the Milky Way's dark matter halo; in reality dust is concentrated in a thin disk, and the paper itself estimates that a disk-like distribution would shift local limits by about four orders of magnitude.

What would settle it

A sub-millimeter/far-infrared survey mapping dust temperature across the inner Galactic disk, compared with the heating predicted for high-spin PBHs at f_PBH = 10^-4, would settle the claim: an unexplained excess would support the limit, while its absence would push the local limit well below 10^-4 — or rule out the assumed dust–PBH coupling.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Spin strengthens dust-heating limits sharply: the strongest constraints (silicate, a* = 0.9999) reach ~10^-4 for every halo profile considered.
  • The halo-profile choice shifts the limits by a factor of a few, with Isothermal tightest and Burkert weakest, so profile systematics matter at this precision level.
  • The method provides an independent probe that can beat the 511 keV positron-annihilation constraint for MPBH < 6×10^15 g at high spin.
  • For lognormal mass functions, increasing sigma broadens the excluded mass range, ruling out heavier PBHs as a dominant dark matter component.
  • Under the paper's uniform-dust assumption the limits are sky-averaged; a realistic disk-like dust distribution would tighten local limits by ~10^4, down to ~10^-8.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Taking the paper's disk-scaling estimate at face value, the true constraining power of dust heating lies in the Galactic disk, not the halo: a realistic 3D dust map would likely push local high-spin limits to ~10^-8, making this one of the strongest probes of 10^15–10^17 g PBHs — an implication the authors leave for future work.
  • The reported halo-profile ranking is probably an artifact of the uniform-dust idealization; with disk-localized dust, the relevant quantity becomes the local dark matter density near the solar circle, so the profile dependence would largely disappear.
  • Since secondary photons contribute mainly below the spectral peak, far-infrared and sub-millimeter dust-temperature observations of the inner Galaxy are the most direct test of the predicted heating pattern.
  • If near-extremal spin (a* ~ 0.9999) is realized by any formation channel, dust-heating limits become competitive with and independent of gamma-ray, neutrino, and 21 cm probes, so the spin parameter deserves more attention in PBH dark matter searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper extends the dust-heating constraint on primordial black holes (PBHs) by including PBH spin and five Galactic dark matter halo profiles. Using BlackHawk to compute primary and secondary Hawking photon spectra, the authors derive upper limits on f_PBH by requiring that PBH heating does not exceed the dust cooling rate (Eq. 15). For the monochromatic and lognormal mass functions they report limits of order 10^-4 for high spin (a*=0.9999) and silicate grains, with profile ordering Isothermal > Einasto > NFW/Moore > Burkert. They also compare their strongest limits with existing constraints from the 511 keV line, IGRB, 21 cm, Voyager, XMM-Newton, and CMB measurements.

Significance. The paper has several strengths: it uses a public and widely used code (BlackHawk), includes secondary photons, systematically treats spin and halo-profile dependence, and the derivation is transparent and contains no fitted parameters. If correct, it would provide an independent, complementary probe of PBHs in the 10^15-10^17 g range. However, the central quantitative claim depends critically on two assumptions: unit absorption efficiency for MeV-scale photons by interstellar dust, and a uniform dust distribution throughout the halo. The first assumption is physically incorrect and overestimates the heating rate by several orders of magnitude, which invalidates the reported O(10^-4) limits. The second is acknowledged in the text but changes the result by about four orders of magnitude, so the presented constraints are not robust limits on the real Milky Way.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (14) and Eq. (4)] The heating rate is set to dE_abs/dt = 4πσ_d F_PBH with no energy-dependent absorption efficiency. For the masses considered (T_H ≈ 0.1-10 MeV), the photon wavelength is far below 2πa, so Eq. (4) gives Q=1, but this geometric-optics expression is inapplicable at MeV energies. A 0.01 μm silicate grain has a mass column of only ρ(4a/3) ≈ 4e-6 g/cm^2; with a mass attenuation coefficient of ~0.03-0.06 cm^2/g at 1 MeV, the absorption probability is ~1e-6, not 1. Since f_PBH scales inversely with heating, the reported O(10^-4) limits are overestimated by 5-7 orders of magnitude. Convolving the Hawking spectrum with an energy-dependent Q_abs(E) is compulsory; without it, the claimed constraint is not physically meaningful.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (14) vs Eq. (11)] There is a normalization inconsistency in the heating rate. In Eq. (11), F_PBH contains 1/(4πR^2), so it is a physical flux. With σ_d = πa^2, the geometrically absorbed power for Q_abs=1 is σ_d F_PBH, not 4πσ_d F_PBH. The extra factor 4π shifts all limits by a factor ~4π (about 1.1 dex). If σ_d is intended to be the grain radius squared rather than the cross-section, this must be stated explicitly and Eq. (3) re-evaluated consistently.
  3. [Section 4, uniform-dust assumption] The manuscript itself states that a realistic disk-like dust distribution would change the limits by about four orders of magnitude, reaching O(10^-8) in the disk and introducing strong directional dependence. Because interstellar dust is actually concentrated in thin and thick disks, the O(10^-4) sky-averaged upper limits are not constraints on the real Milky Way; they are predictions of a uniform-halo dust model. The abstract and conclusions should not present these as the main result without either implementing a realistic 3D dust distribution or explicitly labeling the result as an idealized demonstration.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 4 caption] Typo: 'All resluts' should be 'All results'.
  2. [Section 2.2, Eqs. (6)-(7)] The sentence containing the equilibrium temperatures is garbled: 'T_sil_d = 17.93 and K, T_gra_d = 20.83 K' contains an extraneous 'and K'.
  3. [Reference [17]] The reference for Melikhov and Mikheeva pairs a 2023 PRD article with arXiv:2506.08605, which appears to be from 2025. Please verify the arXiv identifier.
  4. [Abstract and Section 2.1] The abstract mentions PBH masses up to 10^18 g, but the analysis and figures are limited to 10^15-10^17 g (with lognormal characteristic masses up to 10^18 g in the plots). Please clarify the intended mass range.
  5. [Equation (11)] The normalization of Eq. (11) is difficult to audit. The reader cannot easily verify the factors n_d/N_d, the limits of integration, or the units of F_PBH. A short derivation or a dimensional check would improve reproducibility.
  6. [Notation] The heating rate is sometimes written dE_heat/dt and sometimes dE_abs/dt; please use one symbol and define it at first use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: f_PBH limits follow from a linear heating-vs-cooling inequality with no fitted target input.

full rationale

The derivation of the f_PBH constraints is self-contained in the relevant sense: f_PBH enters Eq. (11) linearly, and the limit is obtained by imposing the inequality dE_heat/dt <= dE_rad/dt in Eq. (15). No parameter is fitted to the target constraint. The spin values, halo profiles, and mass-function widths are scanned inputs taken from the literature, and the Hawking spectra are computed with the external public code BlackHawk. The dust cooling rates in Eqs. (8)-(9) come from the adopted equilibrium temperatures and external references [17,77,87], not from the PBH limits. The uniform-dust assumption is explicitly acknowledged as a simplification, and the authors' own estimate that a disk-like distribution would strengthen the local limit is a caveat, not a fitted rescue. The many self-citations to previous work by Y. Yang and collaborators are contextual and do not carry the load of Eqs. (14)-(15). The skeptic's concern about unit absorption efficiency at MeV photon energies is a physical modeling/correctness issue, not a circularity: even if the heating rate is overestimated, the limit is not by construction equal to an input. Therefore no circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central calculation imports its physical content: Hawking spectra from BlackHawk/Page, dust cooling from standard ISM models, halo parameters from prior fits, and a mass-function shape. The genuinely new choices are the scanned spin values, the five-profile comparison, and the uniform-dust simplification, which is the least-supported input.

free parameters (5)
  • PBH spin parameter a* = 0, 0.5, 0.9, 0.999, 0.9999
    Scanned rather than predicted; high-spin values drive the O(10^-4) limits.
  • Halo profile parameters (r_s, ρ_s, α) and resulting R_G = See Table 2; e.g., NFW r_s=24.42 kpc, ρ_s=0.184 GeV/cm^3
    Taken from PPPC 4 DM ID fits; determines profile-dependent ranking of limits.
  • Milky Way mass and DM fraction = M_MW=10^12 M_sun, DM fraction=0.95
    Adopted from Refs [95,96]; sets R_G and the absolute normalization of the flux.
  • Minimum grain radius a=0.01 μm and equilibrium temperatures = T_sil=17.93 K, T_gra=20.83 K
    Selecting the smallest equilibrium grains fixes cooling rates Eqs. (8)-(9), which directly set the f_PBH scale.
  • Lognormal mass-function width σ = 1 and 2
    Scanned in extended-mass-function cases; larger σ broadens the excluded mass range.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Hawking emission spectra including graybody factors and secondary photons are correctly computed by BlackHawk v2.3
    Eq. (2) and Sec. 3; the key spectral input is imported from external code, not independently verified here.
  • domain assumption Dust absorption efficiency Q(λ) is a step function at 2πa and cooling follows the Planck function with fixed equilibrium temperatures
    Eqs. (3)-(7); simplified ISM dust model from Refs [17,77,87] that sets the cooling side of the constraint.
  • ad hoc to paper Interstellar dust is uniformly distributed throughout the Galactic halo
    Explicit assumption in Sec. 3 and Sec. 4; realistic disk distribution would change local limits by ~10^4, so this is the main model-dependence in the central claim.
  • domain assumption Electron heating by Hawking-emitted electrons is negligible (≲ a few percent) because of the short stopping range
    Sec. 3 range argument R_e ~ 0.1-1 kpc ≪ R_G; not included in the main limits.
  • domain assumption The Milky Way dark matter mass is 0.95×10^12 M_sun and the halo is truncated at R_G from Eq. (11)
    Sec. 3 and Table 2; different M_MW values change R_G and the normalization of F_PBH.
  • domain assumption PBH mass function is either monochromatic or lognormal, Eq. (13)
    Assumed shape; the lognormal width σ is scanned, not derived from a formation model.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19368 in / 20722 out tokens · 233959 ms · 2026-08-02T00:23:29.061015+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are compelling dark matter candidates. PBHs with masses between $10^{15}$ and $10^{18}\,\mathrm{g}$ can heat interstellar dust via Hawking radiation. Previous studies of this dust heating mechanism mostly neglected PBH spin and adopted a single dark matter halo profile. In this work, we incorporate PBH spin, which substantially enhances the emitted radiation flux, and systematically investigate the dependence of constraints on the dark matter density distribution by considering five different halo models. We compute the complete photon spectra, including both primary and secondary emissions. Our results show that, for a fixed profile and mass function, larger spin parameters yield stronger constraints on the PBH fraction $f_{\mathrm{PBH}}$. Among the halo models, the Isothermal profile gives the most stringent limits, followed by Einasto, then NFW and Moore, while the Burkert profile yields the weakest constraints. For silicate grains, which cool less efficiently than graphite, the upper limits reach $\mathcal{O}(10^{-4})$ for high spin cases. We consider both monochromatic and lognormal mass functions, and find consistent trends between them. For the lognormal case, larger values of the width $\sigma$ lead to a broader mass range being excluded, in particular ruling out massive PBHs as the sole dark matter component. Our bounds are generally weaker than other existing limits, but they provide a complementary and independent constraint.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15028 by Chengjie Sun, Jiafan Sun, Shaobin Hu, Shuangxi Yi, Yankun Qu, Yupeng Yang, Yuzhu Tong, Zihan Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Total photons spectra (solid lines) and electron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Constraints on the PBH fraction fPBH for different dark matter profiles (NFW, Einasto, Isothermal, Burkert, and Moore), for silicate and graphite grains, and for spin parameters a∗ = 0, 0.5, 0.9, 0.999 and 0.9999. All results are shown for a monochromatic mass function. A comparison among the different dark matter profiles is also shown in the last subplot. We have also compared our results with other exis… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Constraints on the PBH fraction fPBH for different dark matter profiles (NFW, Einasto, Isothermal, Burkert, and Moore), for silicate and graphite grains, and for spin parameters a∗ = 0, 0.5, 0.9, 0.999 and 0.9999. All results are shown for a lognormal mass function with σ = 1. A comparison among the different dark matter profiles is also shown in the last subplot. Note that MPBH = Mc denotes the characteri… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Constraints on the PBH fraction fPBH for different dark matter profiles (NFW, Einasto, Isothermal, Burkert, and Moore), for silicate and graphite, and for spin parameters a∗ = 0, 0.5, 0.9, 0.999 and 0.9999. All resluts are shown for a lognormal mass function with σ = 2. A comparison among the different dark matter profiles is also shown in the last subplot. Note that MPBH = Mc here denotes the characterist… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of constraints on spinning PBHs with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Chen, P.P

    Y. Chen, P.P. Wang, B. Wang, R. Luo, C.G. Shao, The Impact of Dark Matter on Gravita- tional Wave Detection by Space-Based Interfer- ometers. Universe12(2), 48 (2026). https: //doi.org/10.3390/universe12020048

    work page doi:10.3390/universe12020048 2026

  2. [2]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradač, A.H. Gonzalez, M. Marke- vitch, S.W. Randall, C. Jones, D. Zaritsky, A Di- rect Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Mat- ter. apjl648(2), L109–L113 (2006). https://doi. org/10.1086/508162. arXiv:astro-ph/0608407 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    Clowe, A

    D. Clowe, A. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, Weak- Lensing Mass Reconstruction of the Interacting Cluster 1E 0657-558: Direct Evidence for the Exis- tence of Dark Matter. apj604(2), 596–603 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1086/381970. arXiv:astro- ph/0312273 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    Freese, Status of dark matter in the uni- verse

    K. Freese, Status of dark matter in the uni- verse. International Journal of Modern Physics D26(6), 1730012-223 (2017). https://doi.org/ 10.1142/S0218271817300129. arXiv:1701.01840 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Liu, C.K

    Y.G. Liu, C.K. Qiao, J. Tao, Gravitational lensing of spherically symmetric black holes in dark matter halos. jcap2024(10), 075 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2024/10/075. arXiv:2312.15760 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Davis, G

    M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C.S. Frenk, S.D.M. White, The evolution of large-scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter. apj292, 371–394 8 1015 1016 1017 1018 MPBH [g] 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 fPBH NFW, = 1 a* = 0 a* = 0.5 a* = 0.9 a* = 0.999 a* = 0.9999 silicate graphite 1015 1016 1017 1018 MPBH [g] 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 fPBH Einasto, = 1 ...

    1985

  7. [7]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, S. Yokoyama, Primordial Black Hole Sce- nario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914. prl117(6), 061101 (2016). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.061101. arXiv:1603.08338 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Roszkowski, E.M

    L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo, S. Tro- janowski, WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects. Re- ports on Progress in Physics81(6), 066201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aab913. arXiv:1707.06277 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J.B. Muñoz, Y. Ali-Haïmoud, M. Kamionkowski, E.D. Kovetz, A. Rac- canelli, A.G. Riess, Did LIGO Detect Dark Matter? prl116(20), 201301 (2016). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.201301. arXiv:1603.00464 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Green, Primordial black holes as a dark mat- ter candidate - a brief overview

    A.M. Green, Primordial black holes as a dark mat- ter candidate - a brief overview. Nuclear Physics B 1003,116494(2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.nuclphysb.2024.116494. arXiv:2402.15211 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Clesse, J

    S. Clesse, J. García-Bellido, The clustering of massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Measuring their mass distribution with advanced LIGO. Physics of the Dark Universe15, 142– 147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark. 2016.10.002. arXiv:1603.05234 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    B. Carr, F. Kühnel, Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments. An- nual Review of Nuclear and Particle Sci- ence70, 355–394 (2020). https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-050520-125911. arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter Candidates. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2110.02821 (2021). https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2110.02821. arXiv:2110.02821 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.02821 2021

  14. [14]

    DeRocco, P.W

    W. DeRocco, P.W. Graham, Constraining Primor- dial Black Hole Abundance with the Galactic 511 keV Line. prl123(25), 251102 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.251102. arXiv:1906.07740 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Dasgupta, R

    B. Dasgupta, R. Laha, A. Ray, Neutrino and Positron Constraints on Spinning Primor- dial Black Hole Dark Matter. prl125(10), 9 1015 1016 1017 1018 MPBH [g] 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 fPBH NFW, = 2 a* = 0 a* = 0.5 a* = 0.9 a* = 0.999 a* = 0.9999 silicate graphite 1015 1016 1017 1018 MPBH [g] 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 fPBH Einasto, = 2 a* = 0 a* = 0.5 a* = 0.9 a...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Clark, B

    S.J. Clark, B. Dutta, Y. Gao, Y.Z. Ma, L.E. Strigari, 21 cm limits on decaying dark matter and primordial black holes. prd98(4), 043006 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 98.043006. arXiv:1803.09390 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Melikhov, E.V

    A.N. Melikhov, E.V. Mikheeva, Constraints on primordial black holes from the interstellar dust temperature in the Galaxy. prd107(6), 063535 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 107.063535. arXiv:2506.08605 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    B.J. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, J. Yokoyama, New cosmological constraints on primordial black holes. prd81(10), 104019 (2010). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.104019. arXiv:0912.5297 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  19. [19]

    Boudaud, M

    M. Boudaud, M. Cirelli, Voyager 1 e± Further Constrain Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter. prl122(4), 041104 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.041104. arXiv:1807.03075 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    B. Carr, M. Raidal, T. Tenkanen, V. Vaskonen, H. Veermäe, Primordial black hole constraints for extended mass functions. prd96(2), 023514 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 96.023514. arXiv:1705.05567 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Laha, J.B

    R. Laha, J.B. Muñoz, T.R. Slatyer, I N T E G R A L constraints on primordial black holes and particle dark matter. prd101(12), 123514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 101.123514. arXiv:2004.00627 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Zumalacárregui, U

    M. Zumalacárregui, U. Seljak, Limits on Stellar-Mass Compact Objects as Dark Matter from Gravitational Lensing of Type Ia Super- novae. prl121(14), 141101 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.141101. arXiv:1712.02240 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Niikura, M

    H. Niikura, M. Takada, S. Yokoyama, T. Sumi, S. Masaki, Constraints on Earth-mass primordial black holes from OGLE 5-year microlensing events. prd99(8), 083503 (2019). https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083503. arXiv:1901.07120 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Saito, J

    R. Saito, J. Yokoyama, Gravitational-Wave Con- straints on the Abundance of Primordial Black Holes. Progress of Theoretical Physics123(5), 867– 886 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.123

    doi:10.1143/ptp.123 2010

  25. [25]

    Domènech, C

    G. Domènech, C. Lin, M. Sasaki, Gravitational wave constraints on the primordial black hole dominated early universe. jcap2021(4), 062 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2021/04/062. arXiv:2012.08151 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    B.Y. Su, X. Pan, G.S. Wang, L. Zu, Y. Yang, L. Feng, Constraining primordial black holes as dark matter using AMS-02 data. European Physical Journal C84(6), 606 (2024). https:// doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12773-y. arXiv:2403.04988 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Y. Yang, Q. Li, J. Hao, X. Li, Cosmological abundance of primordial black holes in mixed dark matter scenarios incorporating Kaluza–Klein dark matter. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34(13), 2550059 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218271825500592. arXiv:2506.20391 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    J. Hao, Y. Yang, Q. Li, Y. Qu, S. Yi, Muon neu- trinos and the cosmological abundance of primor- dial black holes. Phys. Rev. D110(2), 023532 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 110.023532. arXiv:2406.00664 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Y. Yang, X. Li, G. Li, Constraints on primordial black holes in the mixed dark matter scenarios us- ing the ratio(3He +D)/H. Eur. Phys. J. C83(10), 934 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-12115-4. arXiv:2308.07010 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Yang, Impact of radiation from primordial black holes on the 21-cm angular-power spectrum in the dark ages

    Y. Yang, Impact of radiation from primordial black holes on the 21-cm angular-power spectrum in the dark ages. Phys. Rev. D106(12), 123508 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 106.123508. arXiv:2209.00851 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Yang, Constraints on primordial black holes with CMB spectral distortions

    Y. Yang, Constraints on primordial black holes with CMB spectral distortions. Phys. Rev. D 106(4), 043516 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.106.043516. arXiv:2208.03458 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Yang, Influences of accreting primordial black holes on the global 21cm signal in the dark ages

    Y. Yang, Influences of accreting primordial black holes on the global 21cm signal in the dark ages. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508(4), 5709– 5715 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stab2966. arXiv:2110.06447 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Yang, Constraints on accreting primordial black holes with the global 21-cm signal

    Y. Yang, Constraints on accreting primordial black holes with the global 21-cm signal. Phys. Rev. D104(6), 063528 (2021). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.104.063528. arXiv:2108.11130 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Yang, Constraints on primordial black holes and curvature perturbations from the global 21-cm signal

    Y. Yang, Constraints on primordial black holes and curvature perturbations from the global 21-cm signal. Phys. Rev. D102(8), 083538 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 102.083538. arXiv:2009.11547 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Yang, The abundance of primordial black holes from the global 21cm signal and extragalactic gamma-ray background

    Y. Yang, The abundance of primordial black holes from the global 21cm signal and extragalactic gamma-ray background. Eur. Phys. J. Plus135(9), 690 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/ s13360-020-00710-3. arXiv:2008.11859 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Yang, Constraining primordial black holes and primordial curvature power spectrum with extra- galactic muon neutrino (2026)

    Y. Yang, Constraining primordial black holes and primordial curvature power spectrum with extra- galactic muon neutrino (2026). arXiv:2607.10524 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    García-Bellido, M

    J. García-Bellido, M. Peloso, C. Unal, Grav- itational wave signatures of inflationary mod- els from Primordial Black Hole dark matter. jcap2017(9), 013 (2017). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1475-7516/2017/09/013. arXiv:1707.02441 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Meissner, H

    K.A. Meissner, H. Nicolai, Origin and growth of pri- mordial black holes. Physics Letters B819, 136468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb. 11 2021.136468. arXiv:2101.05233 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Jedamzik, Primordial black hole formation dur- ing the QCD epoch

    K. Jedamzik, Primordial black hole formation dur- ing the QCD epoch. prd55(10), R5871–R5875 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 55.R5871. arXiv:astro-ph/9605152 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  40. [40]

    P. Mróz, A. Udalski, M.K. Szymański, I. Soszyński, P. Pietrukowicz, S. Kozłowski, R. Poleski, J. Skowron, K. Ulaczyk, M. Gromadzki, K. Ry- bicki, P. Iwanek, M. Wrona, M.J. Mróz, Limits on Planetary-mass Primordial Black Holes from the OGLE High-cadence Survey of the Magellanic Clouds. apjl976(1), L19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ ad8e68. arXi...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Kalogera, B.S

    V. Kalogera, B.S. Sathyaprakash, M. Bailes, M.A. Bizouard, A. Buonanno, A. Burrows, M. Colpi, M. Evans, S. Fairhurst, S. Hild, M.M. Kasli- wal, L. Lehner, I. Mandel, V. Mandic, S. Nis- sanke, M. Alessandra Papa, S. Reddy, S. Rosswog, C. Van Den Broeck, P. Ajith, S. Anand, I. An- dreoni, K.G. Arun, E. Barausse, M. Baryakhtar, E. Belgacem, C.P.L. Berry, D. ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.06990 2021

  42. [42]

    Huang, L.Y

    Q. Huang, L.Y. Chen, H. Huang, B. Xu, K. Zhang, Constant-roll inflation and primor- dial black holes within Barrow entropic frame- work. Physics of the Dark Universe50, 102072 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dark.2025.102072. arXiv:2401.15451 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Q.f. Wu, X.J. Xu, Primordial black holes evap- orating before Big Bang nucleosynthesis. jcap 2026(2), 063 (2026). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1475-7516/2026/02/063. arXiv:2509.05618 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    del-Corral, K.S

    D. del-Corral, K.S. Kumar, J. Marto, Gravitational waves from primordial black hole dominance: The effect of inflaton decay rate. Physics of the Dark Universe49, 101991 (2025). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101991. arXiv:2504.05875 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    C. Yuan, Z. Zhong, Q.G. Huang, Whis- pers from the Early Universe: The Ringdown of Primordial Black Holes. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2507.07665 (2025). https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2507.07665. arXiv:2507.07665 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.07665 2025

  46. [46]

    Raidal, V

    M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, H. Veermäe, Gravita- tional waves from primordial black hole mergers. jcap2017(9), 037 (2017). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1475-7516/2017/09/037. arXiv:1707.01480 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Raidal, C

    M. Raidal, C. Spethmann, V. Vaskonen, H. Veer- mäe, Formation and evolution of primordial black hole binaries in the early universe. jcap 2019(2), 018 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1475-7516/2019/02/018. arXiv:1812.01930 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Chiba, S

    T. Chiba, S. Yokoyama, Spin Distribution of Pri- mordial Black Holes. PTEP2017(8), 083E01 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptx087. arXiv:1704.06573 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Mirbabayi, A

    M. Mirbabayi, A. Gruzinov, J. Noreña, Spin of Primordial Black Holes. JCAP03, 017 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2020/03/017. arXiv:1901.05963 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    De Luca, V

    V. De Luca, V. Desjacques, G. Franciolini, A. Mal- hotra, A. Riotto, The initial spin probability dis- tribution of primordial black holes. JCAP05, 018 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2019/05/018. arXiv:1903.01179 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Khlopov, A.G

    M.Y. Khlopov, A.G. Polnarev, Primordial black holes as a cosmological test of grand unification. Physics Letters B97(3-4), 383–387 (1980).https: //doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(80)90624-3

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90624-3 1980

  52. [52]

    Harada, C.M

    T. Harada, C.M. Yoo, K. Kohri, K.I. Nakao, Spins of primordial black holes formed in the matter-dominated phase of the Universe. prd 96(8), 083517 (2017). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.96.083517. arXiv:1707.03595 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    M. He, T. Suyama, Formation threshold of ro- tating primordial black holes. Phys. Rev. D 100(6), 063520 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.100.063520. arXiv:1906.10987 [astro-ph.CO] 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, V. Takhistov, Primor- dial Black Holes from Inflaton Fragmentation into Oscillons. Phys. Rev. D98(8), 083513 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 98.083513. arXiv:1801.03321 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko, M. Sasaki, V. Takhis- tov, Analytic Description of Primordial Black Hole Formation from Scalar Field Fragmenta- tion. JCAP10, 077 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 1088/1475-7516/2019/10/077. arXiv:1907.10613 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Kokubu, K

    T. Kokubu, K. Kyutoku, K. Kohri, T. Harada, Effect of Inhomogeneity on Primordial Black Hole Formation in the Matter Dominated Era. Phys. Rev. D98(12), 123024 (2018).https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.123024. arXiv:1810.03490 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Y. Bai, N. Orlofsky, Primordial Extremal Black HolesasDarkMatter. Phys.Rev.D101(5),055006 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 101.055006. arXiv:1906.04858 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Arbey, J

    A. Arbey, J. Auffinger, J. Silk, Evolution of pri- mordial black hole spin due to Hawking radia- tion. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.494(1), 1257– 1262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ staa765. arXiv:1906.04196 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [62]

    Arbey, J

    A. Arbey, J. Auffinger, J. Silk, Constraining pri- mordial black hole masses with the isotropic gamma ray background. prd101(2), 023010 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 101.023010. arXiv:1906.04750 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [63]

    Luque, J

    P.D.l.T. Luque, J. Koechler, S. Balaji, Re- fining Galactic primordial black hole evap- oration constraints. prd110(12), 123022 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 110.123022. arXiv:2406.11949 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  61. [64]

    MacGibbon, Quark- and gluon-jet emission from primordial black holes

    J.H. MacGibbon, Quark- and gluon-jet emission from primordial black holes. ii. the emission over the black-hole lifetime. Phys. Rev. D44, 376–392 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 44.376. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.44.376

    doi:10.1103/physrevd 1991

  62. [65]

    Arbey, J

    A. Arbey, J. Auffinger, BlackHawk: A public code for calculating the Hawking evaporation spectra of any black hole distribution. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(8), 693 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-019-7161-1. arXiv:1905.04268 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [66]

    Arbey, M

    A. Arbey, M. Calzà, L. Malacher, D. Pedrotti, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez, BlackHawkv3.0: Hawking Radiation from Regular Black Holes (2026). arXiv:2606.06355 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [67]

    Calzá, GrayHawk: A public code for calculating the Gray Body Factors of massless fields around spherically symmetric Black Holes

    M. Calzá, GrayHawk: A public code for calculating the Gray Body Factors of massless fields around spherically symmetric Black Holes. Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101900 (2025). https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.dark.2025.101900. arXiv:2502.04041 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2025

  65. [68]

    Arbey, J

    A. Arbey, J. Auffinger, Physics Beyond the Stan- dard Model with BlackHawk v2.0. Eur. Phys. J. C81, 910 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-021-09702-8. arXiv:2108.02737 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  66. [69]

    Draine, Interstellar dust grains

    B.T. Draine, Interstellar dust grains. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.41, 241–289 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.41. 011802.094840. arXiv:astro-ph/0304489

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  67. [70]

    Mathis, W

    J.S. Mathis, W. Rumpl, K.H. Nordsieck, The size distribution of interstellar grains. apj217, 425–433 (1977).https://doi.org/10.1086/155591

    doi:10.1086/155591 1977

  68. [71]

    Draine, A

    B.T. Draine, A. Li, Infrared Emission from Inter- stellar Dust. 4. The Silicate-Graphite-PAH Model in the Post-Spitzer Era. Astrophys. J.657, 810– 837 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1086/511055. arXiv:astro-ph/0608003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  69. [72]

    Dwek, M.W

    E. Dwek, M.W. Werner, The infrared emission from supernova condensates. ApJ248, 138–151 (1981).https://doi.org/10.1086/159138

    doi:10.1086/159138 1981

  70. [73]

    Dwek, Temperature Fluctuations and Infrared Emission from Dust Particles in a Hot Gas

    E. Dwek, Temperature Fluctuations and Infrared Emission from Dust Particles in a Hot Gas. ApJ 302, 363 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1086/ 163995

    1986

  71. [74]

    Draine, A

    B.T. Draine, A. Li, Infrared emission from inter- stellar dust. I. stochastic heating of small grains. Astrophys. J.551, 807–824 (2001). https://doi. org/10.1086/320227. arXiv:astro-ph/0011318

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  72. [75]

    Ivlev, M

    A. Ivlev, M. Padovani, D. Galli, P. Caselli, Inter- stellar dust charging in dense molecular clouds: 13 cosmic ray effects. Astrophys. J.812(2), 135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 812/2/135. arXiv:1507.00692 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [76]

    Kalv¯ ans, Temperature spectra of interstellar dust grains heated by cosmic rays

    J. Kalv¯ ans, Temperature spectra of interstellar dust grains heated by cosmic rays. ii. dark cloud cores. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Se- ries239(1),6(2018). https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4365/aae527. URL https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4365/aae527

    2018

  74. [77]

    Tielens,The Physics and Chemistry of the Interstellar Medium(2005)

    A.G.G.M. Tielens,The Physics and Chemistry of the Interstellar Medium(2005)

    2005

  75. [78]

    Horn, H.B

    K. Horn, H.B. Perets, O. Biham, Temperature fluctuations of interstellar dust grains (2007). arXiv:0709.3198 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  76. [79]

    Bocchio, A.P

    M. Bocchio, A.P. Jones, L. Verstraete, E.M. Xilouris, E.R. Micelotta, S. Bianchi, Dust heating. Photon absorption versus electron collisions. AAP 556, A6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361/201321054

    2013

  77. [80]

    Mathis, P.G

    J.S. Mathis, P.G. Mezger, N. Panagia, Interstellar radiation field and dust temperatures in the diffuse interstellar medium and in giant molecular clouds. aap128, 212–229 (1983)

    1983

  78. [81]

    Kalv¯ ans, J.R

    J. Kalv¯ ans, J.R. Kalnin, Temperature Spectra of Interstellar Dust Grains Heated by Cosmic Rays. III. Mixed-composition Grains. apjs263(1), 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ ac92e6. arXiv:2209.07812 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  79. [82]

    Ivlev, T.B

    A.V. Ivlev, T.B. Röcker, A. Vasyunin, P. Caselli, Impulsive Spot Heating and Thermal Explosion of Interstellar Grains Revisited. apj805(1), 59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 805/1/59. arXiv:1503.05012 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [83]

    da Cunha, B

    E. da Cunha, B. Groves, F. Walter, R. Decarli, A. Weiss, F. Bertoldi, C. Carilli, E. Daddi, D. El- baz, R. Ivison, R. Maiolino, D. Riechers, H.W. Rix, M. Sargent, I. Smail, On the Effect of the Cosmic Microwave Background in High-redshift (Sub-)millimeter Observations. apj766(1), 13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 766/1/13. arXiv:1302.0844 [ast...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.