Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.12589 v1 pith:BTMKE56A submitted 2022-11-22 cs.FL cs.DCcs.ETnlin.AOnlin.CG

Building Squares with Optimal State Complexity in Restricted Active Self-Assembly

classification cs.FL cs.DCcs.ETnlin.AOnlin.CG
keywords systemsautomatatilefraccomplexitymodelseededstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Tile Automata is a recently defined model of self-assembly that borrows many concepts from cellular automata to create active self-assembling systems where changes may be occurring within an assembly without requiring attachment. This model has been shown to be powerful, but many fundamental questions have yet to be explored. Here, we study the state complexity of assembling $n \times n$ squares in seeded Tile Automata systems where growth starts from a seed and tiles may attach one at a time, similar to the abstract Tile Assembly Model. We provide optimal bounds for three classes of seeded Tile Automata systems (all without detachment), which vary in the amount of complexity allowed in the transition rules. We show that, in general, seeded Tile Automata systems require $\Theta{(\log^{\frac{1}{4}} n)}$ states. For single-transition systems, where only one state may change in a transition rule, we show a bound of $\Theta{(\log^{\frac{1}{3}} n)}$, and for deterministic systems, where each pair of states may only have one associated transition rule, a bound of $\Theta( (\frac{\log n}{\log \log n})^\frac{1}{2} )$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.