A Quantum Interface Between Neutral-Atoms and Trapped-Ions Quantum Registers

Ayelet Hasson; Ehud Shahar; Gal Dekel; Nitzan Akerman; Roee Ozeri

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 44 references

A Quantum Interface Between Neutral-Atoms and Trapped-Ions Quantum Registers

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single Rydberg atom can control whether two trapped ions become entangled, via a state-dependent shift of their shared motional mode that modifies a Mølmer–Sørensen gate.

desk verdict A genuinely new hybrid atom-ion gate proposal whose core mode-shift physics is plausible, but the paper overclaims 'deterministic' given the marginal Rydberg lifetime and skips first-order gate corrections. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20998 v1 pith:BTQC5GV4 submitted 2026-07-23 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Ayelet Hasson , Gal Dekel , Ehud Shahar , Nitzan Akerman , Roee Ozeri This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph MSC 81P6881V80 PACS 03.67.Lx32.80.Ee37.10.Tx

keywords atom-ionhybridsystemsRydbergatomstrappedionsMølmer–Sørensengatepolarizationinteractionopticaltweezersconditionalquantumgatesmotionalmodecontrol

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that a neutral strontium atom, when excited to a Rydberg state, can act as a control qubit for an entangling operation between two trapped ions. The large polarizability of the Rydberg state shifts the center-of-mass motional frequency of the ion crystal, which in turn changes the detuning of a Mølmer–Sørensen gate. With the atom in a low-polarizability clock state, the gate entangles the ions normally; with the atom in the Rydberg state, the gate's accumulated phase is modified and entanglement is suppressed. The authors analyze trapping stability, Rydberg lifetimes, and coherence requirements, and conclude that the scheme is feasible with realistic experimental parameters. If correct, this provides a deterministic quantum interface linking neutral-atom and trapped-ion quantum registers.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the state-dependent COM-mode frequency shift of the two-ion crystal, induced by the Rydberg atom through the polarization potential V_int = −(1/2)α E². The mathematical identity that carries the argument is the MS-gate detuning mapping ξ′ = ξ − Δν, with r_ξ = ξ′/ξ, and the disentanglement condition n r_ξ ∈ Z. This identity turns a motional frequency shift into a conditional geometric phase, making the atom's electronic state the control input for the ion-ion entangling gate.

What would settle it

One concrete test: prepare two 88Sr+ ions in a Paul trap with a single 88Sr atom in optical tweezers at the midpoint; measure the axial COM-mode frequency with the atom in the clock state and then after excitation to a Rydberg state (e.g., 5sns(3S1) with n≈50–60). The predicted shift is tens of kHz on a ~1 MHz mode; its absence would refute the coupling strength. A second test: run an MS gate on the ions with the atom in each internal state and compare the produced Bell-state fidelity—a conditional fidelity difference is the signature of the proposed control mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that exciting a neutral 88Sr atom to a Rydberg state enhances the atom-ion polarization interaction enough to shift the center-of-mass mode of a two-ion 88Sr+ crystal, and that this shift conditionally controls a Mølmer–Sørensen gate: the internal state of the neutral atom determines the entangling interaction between the two ions. Concretely, the frequency shift Δν changes the effective gate detuning from ξ to ξ′=ξ−Δν, and when the ratio r_ξ=ξ′/ξ is such that n r_ξ is an integer, the ions still close their motional trajectory at the gate time but with a modified geometric phase. The gate therefore entangles the ions only when the atom is in the low-polarizabilit

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the only effect of the Rydberg-induced COM-frequency shift on the MS gate is to change the detuning from ξ to ξ′=ξ−Δν, leaving the Lamb-Dicke parameter and mode eigenvector unchanged; if those corrections are sizable, the disentanglement condition and gate phase would be altered.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the Rydberg atom's polarizability is large enough, the two-ion MS gate becomes conditional: it fires with the atom in the clock state and fails to entangle with the atom in the Rydberg state, realizing a three-qubit controlled-entangling operation.
Stable confinement of the Rydberg atom is achievable for negative-polarizability series like 5snd(3D1), where the Paul-trap fields add to the tweezers confinement rather than opposing it.
A magic wavelength near 596 nm allows state-insensitive trapping of both the clock state and high-n Rydberg states, suppressing light-shift dephasing.
At cryogenic temperatures, Rydberg lifetimes exceed the ~100 µs gate time for n ≳ 50, and the required RF amplitude stability of ~10⁻³ is realistic.
The COM-mode frequency shift can be used as a sensitive, state-dependent probe of the atom-ion interaction at the single-particle level.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

As an editorial inference, the same conditional-shift mechanism could generalize to larger ion crystals or multiple Rydberg atoms, turning arrays of neutral atoms into controllers for a network of ion-qubit gates.
The derivation treats the Lamb-Dicke parameter and mode eigenvector as unchanged; a full treatment including those corrections may require adjusting the gate parameters, but could also widen the operable frequency-shift range beyond the n r_ξ ∈ Z condition.
The scheme also offers a practical route to measure Rydberg-state polarizabilities in situ: the COM-mode shift is a direct, nearly background-free readout of α, which could be used to benchmark theoretical Stark maps.
A minimal experiment—single ion plus single atom—could first verify the predicted frequency shift before the full two-ion conditional gate is attempted.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

I read the paper. The new thing here is real: using a Rydberg atom's large static polarizability to shift the COM mode of a two-ion crystal and thereby conditionally toggle an MS gate. That mechanism isn't in the prior Rydberg-ion proposals, and the idea of a three-qubit hybrid gate with the atom as control is worth taking seriously. The normal-mode part is a standard harmonic expansion with external atomic data (PairInteraction, Safronova portal), and the trap parameters are representative; the core physics is plausible.

What the paper does well: it checks several practical constraints—Rydberg trapping stability in the combined Paul trap and tweezers, magic wavelength for state-insensitive trapping, field-ionization rates, validity of the dipole approximation, and anharmonic corrections. That is a genuinely useful feasibility analysis. The negative-polarizability Rydberg series (5snd 3D1) is a sensible choice.

Now the soft spots, in order of seriousness. First, the stress-test concern is valid and load-bearing: the paper's own numbers give Rydberg T1 ≈ 100 µs and gate time T = 100 µs, so an exponential decay gives ~37% probability the atom survives the full gate. A decay mid-gate changes the mode frequency, and the MS phase trajectory no longer closes; the ions end up mixed. The abstract calls the gate 'deterministic,' and that word is not supported. A post-selection or error model could salvage it, but there is none.

Second, the gate derivation in §2.2 substitutes ξ' = ξ - Δν and leaves the Lamb-Dicke parameter and mode eigenvectors at their unshifted values. The mode participation changes by a few percent at the quoted shifts. That enters the phase integral and the disentanglement condition nrξ ∈ Z. The paper does not show the gate survives those corrections. This is a fixable technical gap, not a fatal flaw, but it must be addressed before the claim is credible.

Minor: the equations are riddled with garbled superscripts (2^5 renders as 25, etc.), and no code or data is shipped. That hurts reproducibility, but the calculation is simple enough to redo.

Who is this for: people working on hybrid atom-ion platforms, particularly the groups trying to couple Rydberg atoms to trapped ions. It is a serious proposal, not a back-of-envelope fantasy. It deserves a proper peer review. I'd send it to referees, with the request that the gate derivation be redone including the full mode-vector corrections and that the lifetime issue be confronted head-on.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a hybrid neutral-atom/trapped-ion quantum interface in which a single 88Sr atom, optically trapped at the midpoint of two 88Sr+ ions, is excited to a Rydberg state. The resulting large static polarizability enhances the atom-ion polarization interaction and shifts the axial center-of-mass (COM) mode frequency of the two-ion crystal. The authors derive the normal-mode structure in §2.1, then argue in §2.2 that the frequency shift acts as an additional detuning in a Mølmer–Sørensen (MS) gate, so that the atom's internal state conditionally controls the ion-ion entangling operation. The experimental feasibility is assessed in §3 through magic-wavelength optical trapping, Paul-trap stability for negative-polarizability Rydberg states, and Rydberg lifetime/coherence estimates.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this would be a useful and original route toward hybrid atom-ion quantum registers: a neutral-atom control qubit switching an ion-ion entangling gate via a state-dependent motional shift. The paper has several strengths: the harmonic normal-mode calculation in §2.1 is explicit and standard; the polarizability and lifetime inputs are obtained from established packages (PairInteraction) and atomic-data portals; and the appendices address dipole-approximation validity, field ionization, and anharmonic corrections. However, the central gate derivation omits first-order corrections to the Lamb-Dicke parameter and mode eigenvector, and the manuscript's own parameters imply a Rydberg survival probability of only about 37% over the gate duration. These issues are load-bearing for the claimed deterministic conditional gate, so the paper needs substantive revision before the central claim is supported.

major comments (4)

[§2.2, Eq. (14)] The conditional-gate derivation treats the Rydberg-induced COM-frequency shift solely through the substitution ξ' = ξ − Δν. This neglects that the same frequency shift also changes the Lamb-Dicke parameter η (∝ ν^{-1/2}) and the COM-mode eigenvector in Eq. (7): the ion amplitude factor changes from 1/√2 to 1/√(2 + a² r_m). These first-order corrections enter the same MS phase integral A'(T) and the disentanglement condition n rξ ∈ Z. For the parameters considered (Δν of tens of kHz on a 1 MHz mode), the corrections are at the few-percent level and cannot be assumed negligible without quantitative justification. The manuscript should redo the gate analysis with the corrected η and eigenvector, or demonstrate a parameter regime where these corrections are genuinely second order.
[§3.3] The manuscript states that the Rydberg lifetime must be ~100 μs for mode shifts of tens of kHz, and a few lines later uses a gate duration T = 100 μs. With T1 ≈ T, the probability that the atom remains in the Rydberg state throughout the gate is exp(−1) ≈ 0.37. A decay mid-gate changes the COM-mode frequency during the pulse, breaks the phase-space closure, and leaves the ions in a mixed state. The abstract's 'deterministic' claim is therefore not supported by the paper's own parameters. The authors should either choose parameters with T1 ≫ T, incorporate a post-selection or heralding scheme, or explicitly present the gate as probabilistic/heralded.
[Fig. 2 and §2.2] The population dynamics shown in Fig. 2 are central to the proposal, but the manuscript does not specify the Hamiltonian used, the values of Ω, η, ξ, n, and rξ, or whether the shifted-gate curves were produced from Eq. (14) or from a full time-dependent simulation including corrected mode parameters. Without these details the numerical demonstration cannot be verified or reproduced. Please provide the simulation setup and parameters.
[§2.1 and Fig. 1] The link between the abstract's conditional-gate claim and the normal-mode shift is not quantified. Fig. 1 shows relative COM-frequency shifts versus n but does not state which n or polarizability produces the specific shift needed for the gate (e.g., Δν = ξ/2 for rξ = 1/2). The text refers to 'mode shifts of a few 10's kHz' without connecting them to the chosen Rydberg states and trap parameters. This quantitative connection is necessary to assess whether the proposed gate parameters are compatible with realistic states.

minor comments (5)

[Appendix A, Eqs. (23)–(24)] Eq. (23) has unbalanced parentheses and appears to have a formatting error in the denominators. Eq. (24) for E_radial,max appears dimensionally incorrect: the right-hand side contains α, although it is supposed to give an electric field. Please correct these expressions.
[Appendix C, Eqs. (30)–(31)] The polynomial fits for the anharmonic COM frequency correction are presented without error bars, amplitude ranges, or a clear definition of the normalized amplitude A. The units of α in 'ℏ MHz cm²/V²' should also be defined explicitly.
[§3.2] The text says the radial trapping frequency is used and anisotropy is neglected, but Fig. 6 shows both radial and axial frequencies. Please clarify which curve corresponds to the stability criterion in Eq. (16).
[Introduction/§4] The related proposal by Mudli [43] is mentioned only in the final sentence. A brief comparison of mechanisms and advantages would help position the present work.
[§2.1, Eqs. (8)–(9)] The expressions for a, b, and λ are dense. A derivation sketch or a consistency check in the α→0 limit (where v1→(1,1,0) and v3→(0,0,1)) would improve readability, even though the limit is stated in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the conditional MS-gate derivation uses external polarizability inputs and standard MS theory rather than its own conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The central prediction—that a Rydberg-state polarizability shifts the two-ion COM mode and thereby modifies the MS-gate phase—follows from independent inputs: (i) static polarizabilities computed with the external PairInteraction package and fitted only to the quadratic Stark relation (Sec. 2.1), not to the gate condition; (ii) the standard two-ion normal-mode formalism [29] and MS-gate phase formula [32,33]; and (iii) representative experimental trap parameters. Equation (14) is a direct algebraic consequence of substituting ξ' = ξ − Δν into the standard MS phase integral, and the condition n r_ξ ∈ Z is a design constraint, not a fitted prediction. No predicted quantity is defined in terms of the target effect. The self-citation [34] describes an experimentally realized analogous state-dependent tweezer-controlled entanglement gate; it is cited as supporting evidence and is not needed for Eq. (14)'s derivation. The T1 ≈ T concern raised in Sec. 3.3 is a fidelity and correctness limitation, not a circularity: it affects whether the proposed gate would work, not whether the derivation reduces to its inputs. Likewise, the unspecified Hamiltonian behind Fig. 2 is an omitted-detail/correctness issue, not a circular step. I therefore find no circular step requiring a nonzero score.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on external atomic data (PairInteraction/SQDT), the published 596 nm magic-wavelength result, and two approximations specific to this paper: the pure-detuning model of the shifted MS gate (Eq. 14) and the sufficiency of ~100 µs Rydberg coherence for a 100 µs gate. No free parameter is fitted to the target result; the listed parameters are representative experimental values and side-calculation fit coefficients.

free parameters (7)

Ion axial trap frequency νI = 2π × 1 MHz
Chosen representative value in Eq. 2 and used for all mode-shift calculations in §2.1; the relative COM shift depends strongly on νI.
Atom tweezer axial trap frequency νA = 2π × 300 kHz
Chosen value in §2.1; the mode shift is stated to be insensitive to νA unless comparable to νI, but the eigenvalue expressions use it.
Paul trap RF voltage V_RF and distance scale r0 = ≈200 V, 0.27 mm
Used in stability (§3.2) and field-ionization (App. B) estimates.
RF drive frequency ΩRF = 22 MHz
Used in RF-stability requirement Eq. 20 and for the static-polarizability pseudopotential treatment.
MS gate loop number and detuning ratio = n=2, rξ=1/2, T=100 µs
Chosen in §2.2/Fig. 2 to illustrate the conditional gate; no sensitivity analysis is given.
Temperature for amplitude estimates = 1 mK
Upper-bound temperature in App. A for COM amplitude A≈0.07 µm; used in the anharmonic correction estimates.
Anharmonic polynomial fit coefficients = 0.99, 0.0012, -0.153; 1.011, 0.0038, -0.239
Fitted to numerical ODE trajectories in App. C (Eqs. 30-31) to estimate amplitude-dependent COM frequency corrections; not central to the gate claim but used to quote temperature corrections.

assumptions (10)

domain assumption The atom is treated as a point dipole: interaction energy is V=-1/2 α|E|^2 with static polarizability α (Born-Oppenheimer/quadratic Stark regime).
Used throughout §2-3 and validated only in Appendix A via rE and rr criteria; assumes the Rydberg electron cloud is small and the field is weak relative to level spacings.
domain assumption A Rydberg atom in the 22 MHz Paul trap experiences the time-averaged (pseudopotential) field with static polarizability, not a dynamic or Floquet response.
Section 3.2, Eq. 18; requires ΩRF ≫ trap frequencies and no resonant coupling to Rydberg transitions.
standard math Harmonic expansion of the total potential around equilibrium is sufficient for the normal-mode analysis and the gate shift; anharmonic terms are a small correction.
Section 2.1 and Appendix C; Appendix C quantifies but does not fully validate the correction at 1 mK.
standard math Mølmer–Sørensen gate theory (refs [32,33]): bichromatic sideband drive, Lamb-Dicke regime, phase A(t)=η²Ω²/ξ [t - sin(2ξt)/(2ξ)], and disentanglement when n rξ ∈ Z.
Section 2.2, Eqs. 12-15; the paper relies on this external gate theory.
domain assumption PairInteraction package [30] and single-channel quantum defect theory provide correct static polarizabilities and lifetimes for 88Sr 5sns(3S1) and 5snd(3D1) Rydberg states.
Used in §2.1 and §3.3; the sign (negative polarizability for 3D1) and magnitudes drive the feasibility conclusions.
domain assumption A universal magic wavelength near 596 nm exists for 88Sr where the clock state and n>50 Rydberg states have equal dynamic polarizability (ref [37]); the core-only estimate ~170 a.u. (Fig. 4) is adequate for trap-depth estimates.
Section 3.1; the whole state-insensitive-tweezer argument rests on this.
domain assumption The two-ion crystal remains a linear Coulomb chain with the same normal-mode branch during the gate; the atom does not induce a structural transition or mode crossing.
Section 2.1; not checked for the proposed parameters.
domain assumption Langevin collisions and charge-exchange between the neutral atom and ions are negligible on the gate timescale because the atom is trapped in tweezers at the midpoint.
Introduction and §3; no collision-rate estimate is given.
ad hoc to paper The shifted MS gate is modeled solely as a change of detuning ξ' = ξ - Δν, leaving η and the COM-mode eigenvector unchanged.
Section 2.2, Eq. 14; this is an approximation introduced for this paper and is not derived or tested.
ad hoc to paper The Rydberg-state T1 and T2 coherence times are long enough to execute the 100 µs gate with high fidelity.
Section 3.3; with T1 ~100 µs at n≈50, decay during a 100 µs gate is ~63%, so this assumption is not self-evidently satisfied.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Quantum Interface Between Neutral-Atoms and Trapped-Ions Quantum Registers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BTQC5GV4

@misc{pith2026260720998,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Quantum Interface Between Neutral-Atoms and Trapped-Ions Quantum Registers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BTQC5GV4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20998}
}

read the original abstract

Hybrid quantum systems combining neutral atoms and trapped ions offer the prospect of integrating the scalability of atom arrays with the high-fidelity control available in trapped-ion platforms. Here we propose and analyze a quantum interface between individually trapped neutral atoms and a trapped-ion crystal. In our scheme, a neutral 88Sr atom trapped in optical tweezers interacts with a small 88Sr+ ion crystal, and by exciting the atom to a Rydberg state, the atom-ion polarization interaction is strongly enhanced, resulting in a state-dependent modification of the ions' collective motional modes. We show that this shift enables conditional control of a MS gate, allowing the neutral atom to act as a control qubit for an entangling operation between two ions. We investigate the feasibility of the scheme by analyzing Rydberg trapping in the combined optical tweezers and Paul trap potentials, identifying negative-polarizability Rydberg states as particularly favorable for stable confinement. We further evaluate the relevant trapping conditions, Rydberg lifetimes, and coherence requirements, and show that the proposed interface is compatible with realistic experimental parameters. These results establish a practical route toward deterministic atom-ion hybrid quantum gates and quantum interfaces.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20998 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Time evolution of the two-ion state populations during a Mølmer–Sørensen (MS) gate. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Left - proposed experimental system including two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (8 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Dynamic polarizability of 88Sr as a function of wavelength, using a simplified model. The blue and red curves show the polarizabilities of the 5s5p ( 3P0) clock state and 5sns Rydberg states, respectively. The intersection near 596 nm indicates the magic wavelength whe…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Calculated trapping parameters for optical tweezers at the magic wavelength of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Radial (left) and axial (right) trapping frequencies of the 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Calculated lifetimes of the 5sns( 3S1) and 5snd( 3D1) Rydberg series of 88Sr as a function of the effective principal quantum number n ∗ , for temperatures of T = 0 K and T = 300 K. The estimates presented above account only for population decay processes and therefore…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Ratio between the estimated Rydberg radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: The ratio rE as a function of the principal quantum number n for the S1 (red) and D1 (blue) Rydberg states. The left and right panels correspond to displacement in the axial and radial directions, respectively. Although rE increases with n due to the growing polarizabi…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: electric-field ionization of 88Sr Rydberg atoms. The left panel shows the calculated ionization rate as a function of the principal quantum number n and the applied electric field strength, illustrating the strong exponential increase of the ionization probability for…

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: COM frequency multiplier obtained from numerical integration of the full equations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references

[1]

Wang, Sepehr Ebadi, Marcin Kalinowski, Alexander Keesling, Nishad Maskara, Hannes Pichler, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D

Dolev Bluvstein, Harry Levine, Giulia Semeghini, Tout T. Wang, Sepehr Ebadi, Marcin Kalinowski, Alexander Keesling, Nishad Maskara, Hannes Pichler, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D. Lukin. A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays.Nature, 604(7906):451–456, April 2022

2022
[2]

Jordan Berg, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Florian J

Minzhao Liu, Ruslan Shaydulin, Pradeep Niroula, Matthew DeCross, Shih-Han Hung, Wen Yu Kon, Enrique Cervero-Mart ´ ın, Kaushik Chakraborty, Omar Amer, Scott Aaron- son, Atithi Acharya, Yuri Alexeev, K. Jordan Berg, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Florian J. Curchod, Joan M. Dreiling, Neal Erickson, Cameron Foltz, Michael Foss-Feig, David Hayes, Travis S. Humble, N...

2025
[3]

Georgescu, S

I.M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and Franco Nori. Quantum simulation.Reviews of Modern Physics, 86(1):153–185, March 2014

2014
[4]

Ludlow, Martin M

Andrew D. Ludlow, Martin M. Boyd, Jun Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt. Optical atomic clocks.Rev. Mod. Phys., 87:637–701, Jun 2015

2015
[5]

Jaksch, J

D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and M. D. Lukin. Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:2208–2211, Sep 2000

2000
[6]

Saffman, T

M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer. Quantum information with rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:2313–2363, Aug 2010

2010
[7]

An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays.Science, 354(6315):1021–1023, 2016

Daniel Barredo, Sylvain de L´ es´ eleuc, Vincent Lienhard, Thierry Lahaye, and Antoine Browaeys. An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays.Science, 354(6315):1021–1023, 2016

2016
[8]

Zibrov, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D

Hannes Bernien, Sylvain Schwartz, Alexander Keesling, Harry Levine, Ahmed Omran, Hannes Pichler, Soonwon Choi, Alexander S. Zibrov, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D. Lukin. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quan- tum simulator.Nature, 551(7682):579–584, November 2017

2017

Show all 44 references

[9]

Many-body physics with individually controlled rydberg atoms.Nature Physics, 16(2):132–142, January 2020

Antoine Browaeys and Thierry Lahaye. Many-body physics with individually controlled rydberg atoms.Nature Physics, 16(2):132–142, January 2020

2020
[10]

Evered, Alexandra A

Dolev Bluvstein, Simon J. Evered, Alexandra A. Geim, Sophie H. Li, Hengyun Zhou, Tom Manovitz, Sepehr Ebadi, Madelyn Cain, Marcin Kalinowski, Dominik Hangleiter, J. Pablo Bonilla Ataides, Nishad Maskara, Iris Cong, Xun Gao, Pedro Sales Rodriguez, Thomas Karolyshyn, Giulia Seme...

2023
[11]

A. C. Hughes, R. Srinivas, C. M. L¨ oschnauer, H. M. Knaack, R. Matt, C. J. Ballance, M. Malinowski, T. P. Harty, and R. T. Sutherland. Trapped-ion two-qubit gates with ¿99.99% fidelity without ground-state cooling, 2025

2025
[12]

Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate.Nature, 422:412–415, 2003

Dietrich Leibfried et al. Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate.Nature, 422:412–415, 2003

2003
[13]

C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas. High-fidelity quantum logic gates using trapped-ion hyperfine qubits.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:060504, Aug 2016

2016
[14]

Duan, Dahyun Yum, and Kihwan Kim

Ye Wang, Mark Um, Junhua Zhang, Shuoming An, Ming Lyu, Jing-Ning Zhang, L.-M. Duan, Dahyun Yum, and Kihwan Kim. Single-qubit quantum memory exceeding ten- minute coherence time.Nature Photonics, 11(10):646–650, sep 2017

2017
[15]

Julienne

Micha l Tomza, Krzysztof Jachymski, Rene Gerritsma, Antonio Negretti, Tommaso Calarco, Zbigniew Idziaszek, and Paul S. Julienne. Cold hybrid ion-atom systems.Rev. Mod. Phys., 91:035001, Jul 2019

2019
[16]

Saito, S

R. Saito, S. Haze, M. Sasakawa, R. Nakai, M. Raoult, H. Da Silva, O. Dulieu, and T. Mukaiyama. Characterization of charge-exchange collisions between ultracold 6Li atoms and 40Ca+ ions.Phys. Rev. A, 95:032709, Mar 2017

2017
[17]

Dynamics of a ground-state cooled ion colliding with ultracold atoms.Phys

Ziv Meir, Tomas Sikorsky, Ruti Ben-shlomi, Nitzan Akerman, Yehonatan Dallal, and Roee Ozeri. Dynamics of a ground-state cooled ion colliding with ultracold atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:243401, Dec 2016

2016
[18]

Grier, Marko Cetina, Fedja Oruˇ cevi´ c, and Vladan Vuleti´ c

Andrew T. Grier, Marko Cetina, Fedja Oruˇ cevi´ c, and Vladan Vuleti´ c. Observation of cold collisions between trapped ions and trapped atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:223201, Jun 2009

2009
[19]

Joger, H

J. Joger, H. F¨ urst, N. Ewald, T. Feldker, M. Tomza, and R. Gerritsma. Observation of collisions between cold li atoms and yb + ions.Phys. Rev. A, 96:030703, Sep 2017

2017
[20]

Observation of feshbach resonances between a single ion and ultracold atoms.Nature, 600(7889):429–433, December 2021

Pascal Weckesser, Fabian Thielemann, Dariusz Wiater, Agata Wojciechowska, Leon Karpa, Krzysztof Jachymski, Micha l Tomza, Thomas Walker, and Tobias Schaetz. Observation of feshbach resonances between a single ion and ultracold atoms.Nature, 600(7889):429–433, December 2021

2021
[21]

H. M. J. M. Boesten, C. C. Tsai, J. R. Gardner, D. J. Heinzen, and B. J. Verhaar. Observa- tion of a shape resonance in the collision of two cold 87Rb atoms.Phys. Rev. A, 55:636–640, Jan 1997

1997
[22]

Trap- assisted formation of atom–ion bound states.Nature Physics, 19(11):1573–1578, August 2023

Meirav Pinkas, Or Katz, Jonathan Wengrowicz, Nitzan Akerman, and Roee Ozeri. Trap- assisted formation of atom–ion bound states.Nature Physics, 19(11):1573–1578, August 2023

2023
[23]

Direct observation of ultracold atom-ion excitation exchange.Phys

Ruti Ben-shlomi, Romain Vexiau, Ziv Meir, Tomas Sikorsky, Nitzan Akerman, Meirav Pinkas, Olivier Dulieu, and Roee Ozeri. Direct observation of ultracold atom-ion excitation exchange.Phys. Rev. A, 102:031301, Sep 2020. 20

2020
[24]

Quantum logic detection of collisions between single atom–ion pairs.Nature Physics, 18(5):533–537, March 2022

Or Katz, Meirav Pinkas, Nitzan Akerman, and Roee Ozeri. Quantum logic detection of collisions between single atom–ion pairs.Nature Physics, 18(5):533–537, March 2022

2022
[25]

Spin con- trolled atom-ion inelastic collisions, 2017

Tomas Sikorsky, Ziv Meir, Ruti Ben-shlomi, Nitzan Akerman, and Roee Ozeri. Spin con- trolled atom-ion inelastic collisions, 2017

2017
[26]

Secker, R

T. Secker, R. Gerritsma, A. W. Glaetzle, and A. Negretti. Controlled long-range interac- tions between rydberg atoms and ions.Phys. Rev. A, 94:013420, Jul 2016

2016
[27]

Secker, N

T. Secker, N. Ewald, J. Joger, H. F¨ urst, T. Feldker, and R. Gerritsma. Trapped ions in rydberg-dressed atomic gases.Phys. Rev. Lett., 118:263201, Jun 2017

2017
[28]

Optical control of atom-ion collisions using a rydberg state.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53(13):134005, jun 2020

Limei Wang, Markus Deiß, Georg Raithel, and Johannes Hecker Denschlag. Optical control of atom-ion collisions using a rydberg state.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53(13):134005, jun 2020

2020
[29]

D.F.V. James. Quantum dynamics of cold trapped ions with application to quantum computation.Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics, 66(2):181–190, February 1998

1998
[30]

Tutorial: Calculation of rydberg interaction po- tentials.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 50(13):133001, 2017

Sebastian Weber, Christoph Tresp, Henri Menke, Alban Urvoy, Ofer Firstenberg, Hans Pe- ter B¨ uchler, and Sebastian Hofferberth. Tutorial: Calculation of rydberg interaction po- tentials.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 50(13):133001, 2017

2017
[31]

D. J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, and D. M. Meekhof. Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions, 1998

1998
[32]

Entanglement and quantum computation with ions in thermal motion.Phys

Anders Sørensen and Klaus Mølmer. Entanglement and quantum computation with ions in thermal motion.Phys. Rev. A, 62:022311, Jul 2000

2000
[33]

Robust entanglement gates for trapped-ion qubits.Physical Review Letters, 121(18), November 2018

Yotam Shapira, Ravid Shaniv, Tom Manovitz, Nitzan Akerman, and Roee Ozeri. Robust entanglement gates for trapped-ion qubits.Physical Review Letters, 121(18), November 2018

2018
[34]

Optical tweezer-controlled entanglement gates with trapped-ion qubits.Phys

David Schwerdt, Lee Peleg, Gal Dekel, Lekshmi Rajagopal, Oz Matoki, Avram Gross, Yotam Shapira, Nitzan Akerman, and Roee Ozeri. Optical tweezer-controlled entanglement gates with trapped-ion qubits.Phys. Rev. Lett., 136:020604, Jan 2026

2026
[35]

Intensity landscape and the possibility of magic trapping of alkali-metal rydberg atoms in infrared optical lattices.Phys

Turker Topcu and Andrei Derevianko. Intensity landscape and the possibility of magic trapping of alkali-metal rydberg atoms in infrared optical lattices.Phys. Rev. A, 88:043407, Oct 2013

2013
[36]

J. T. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. P. Burgers, and J. D. Thompson. Trapping alkaline earth rydberg atoms optical tweezer arrays.Phys. Rev. Lett., 128:033201, Jan 2022

2022
[37]

Divalent rydberg atoms in optical lattices: Intensity landscape and magic trapping.Physical Review A, 89(2), February 2014

Turker Topcu and Andrei Derevianko. Divalent rydberg atoms in optical lattices: Intensity landscape and magic trapping.Physical Review A, 89(2), February 2014. 21

2014
[38]

Safronova

Amani Kiruga, Charles Cheung, Dmytro Filin, Parinaz Barakhshan, Akshay Bhosale, Vipul Badhan, Bindiya Arora, Rudolf Eigenmann, and Marianna S. Safronova. Portal for high- precision atomic data and computation.Computer Physics Communications, 319:109951, 2026

2026
[39]

Ovchinnikov

Rudolf Grimm, Matthias Weidem¨ uller, and Yurii B. Ovchinnikov. Optical dipole traps for neutral atoms, 1999

1999
[40]

Rydberg atoms.Reports on Progress in Physics, 51(2):143, feb 1988

T F Gallagher. Rydberg atoms.Reports on Progress in Physics, 51(2):143, feb 1988

1988
[41]

Quantum defect theory i

M J Seaton. Quantum defect theory i. general formulation.Proceedings of the Physical Society, 88(4):801, aug 1966

1966
[42]

Robertson, N

E.J. Robertson, N. ˇSibali´ c, R.M. Potvliege, and M.P.A. Jones. Arc 3.0: An expanded python toolbox for atomic physics calculations.Computer Physics Communications, 261:107814, 2021

2021
[43]

Ion-atom two-qubit quantum gate based on phonon blockade.Physica Scripta, 101(21):215105, May 2026

Subhra Mudli and Bimalendu Deb. Ion-atom two-qubit quantum gate based on phonon blockade.Physica Scripta, 101(21):215105, May 2026

2026
[44]

Gallagher.Rydberg atoms

Thomas F. Gallagher.Rydberg atoms. Cambridge monographs on atomic, molecular, and chemical physics ; 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. 22

1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Wang, Sepehr Ebadi, Marcin Kalinowski, Alexander Keesling, Nishad Maskara, Hannes Pichler, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D

Dolev Bluvstein, Harry Levine, Giulia Semeghini, Tout T. Wang, Sepehr Ebadi, Marcin Kalinowski, Alexander Keesling, Nishad Maskara, Hannes Pichler, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D. Lukin. A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays.Nature, 604(7906):451–456, April 2022

2022

[2] [2]

Jordan Berg, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Florian J

Minzhao Liu, Ruslan Shaydulin, Pradeep Niroula, Matthew DeCross, Shih-Han Hung, Wen Yu Kon, Enrique Cervero-Mart ´ ın, Kaushik Chakraborty, Omar Amer, Scott Aaron- son, Atithi Acharya, Yuri Alexeev, K. Jordan Berg, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Florian J. Curchod, Joan M. Dreiling, Neal Erickson, Cameron Foltz, Michael Foss-Feig, David Hayes, Travis S. Humble, N...

2025

[3] [3]

Georgescu, S

I.M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and Franco Nori. Quantum simulation.Reviews of Modern Physics, 86(1):153–185, March 2014

2014

[4] [4]

Ludlow, Martin M

Andrew D. Ludlow, Martin M. Boyd, Jun Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt. Optical atomic clocks.Rev. Mod. Phys., 87:637–701, Jun 2015

2015

[5] [5]

Jaksch, J

D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and M. D. Lukin. Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 85:2208–2211, Sep 2000

2000

[6] [6]

Saffman, T

M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer. Quantum information with rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:2313–2363, Aug 2010

2010

[7] [7]

An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays.Science, 354(6315):1021–1023, 2016

Daniel Barredo, Sylvain de L´ es´ eleuc, Vincent Lienhard, Thierry Lahaye, and Antoine Browaeys. An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays.Science, 354(6315):1021–1023, 2016

2016

[8] [8]

Zibrov, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D

Hannes Bernien, Sylvain Schwartz, Alexander Keesling, Harry Levine, Ahmed Omran, Hannes Pichler, Soonwon Choi, Alexander S. Zibrov, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D. Lukin. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quan- tum simulator.Nature, 551(7682):579–584, November 2017

2017