Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparative Analysis of Content-based Geolocation in Blogs and Tweets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.07497 v1 pith:BTSNPFZF submitted 2018-11-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords geolocationmediasocialtwitterbloggerfeaturespredictionsusers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The geolocation of online information is an essential component in any geospatial application. While most of the previous work on geolocation has focused on Twitter, in this paper we quantify and compare the performance of text-based geolocation methods on social media data drawn from both Blogger and Twitter. We introduce a novel set of location specific features that are both highly informative and easily interpretable, and show that we can achieve error rate reductions of up to 12.5% with respect to the best previously proposed geolocation features. We also show that despite posting longer text, Blogger users are significantly harder to geolocate than Twitter users. Additionally, we investigate the effect of training and testing on different media (cross-media predictions), or combining multiple social media sources (multi-media predictions). Finally, we explore the geolocability of social media in relation to three user dimensions: state, gender, and industry.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools