Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DeepFakes and Beyond: A Survey of Face Manipulation and Fake Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.00179 v3 pith:BULAOFN5 submitted 2020-01-01 cs.CV cs.MM

classification cs.CVcs.MM
keywords fakemanipulationsurveydeepfakesdetectionfacemethodstechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The free access to large-scale public databases, together with the fast progress of deep learning techniques, in particular Generative Adversarial Networks, have led to the generation of very realistic fake content with its corresponding implications towards society in this era of fake news. This survey provides a thorough review of techniques for manipulating face images including DeepFake methods, and methods to detect such manipulations. In particular, four types of facial manipulation are reviewed: i) entire face synthesis, ii) identity swap (DeepFakes), iii) attribute manipulation, and iv) expression swap. For each manipulation group, we provide details regarding manipulation techniques, existing public databases, and key benchmarks for technology evaluation of fake detection methods, including a summary of results from those evaluations. Among all the aspects discussed in the survey, we pay special attention to the latest generation of DeepFakes, highlighting its improvements and challenges for fake detection. In addition to the survey information, we also discuss open issues and future trends that should be considered to advance in the field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spotting tell-tale visual artifacts in face swapping videos: strengths and pitfalls of CNN detectors

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CNN detectors for face-swap videos achieve near-perfect accuracy on the same dataset they are trained on, but cross-dataset accuracy drops dramatically, showing they learn dataset-specific cues rather than occlusion-b...

Pith tools