Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Helpful assistant or fruitful facilitator? Investigating how personas affect language model behavior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.02099 v2 pith:BUQGFFY2 submitted 2024-07-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords personamodelspersonasassistantbehaviorcontrolhelpfulquestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

One way to personalize and steer generations from large language models (LLM) is to assign a persona: a role that describes how the user expects the LLM to behave (e.g., a helpful assistant, a teacher, a woman). This paper investigates how personas affect diverse aspects of model behavior. We assign to seven LLMs 162 personas from 12 categories spanning variables like gender, sexual orientation, and occupation. We prompt them to answer questions from five datasets covering objective (e.g., questions about math and history) and subjective tasks (e.g., questions about beliefs and values). We also compare persona's generations to two baseline settings: a control persona setting with 30 paraphrases of "a helpful assistant" to control for models' prompt sensitivity, and an empty persona setting where no persona is assigned. We find that for all models and datasets, personas show greater variability than the control setting and that some measures of persona behavior generalize across models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. No for Some, Yes for Others: Persona Prompts and Other Sources of False Refusal in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A broad measurement study shows that false refusals in LLMs depend more on model and task choice than on sociodemographic personas, with newer models refusing far less.

  2. Localizing Persona Representations in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Persona information is most separable in the final third of LLM layers, and in Llama3's last layer ethical personas share 17.6% of salient activations while political personas have 2.1% to 5.5% unique activations.

Pith tools