Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Planck 2015 results. III. LFI systematic uncertainties

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1507.08853 v2 pith:BWE6IVUT submitted 2015-07-31 astro-ph.CO

Planck 2015 results. III. LFI systematic uncertainties

Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade , J. Aumont , C. Baccigalupi , A. J. Banday , R. B. Barreiro , N. Bartolo , S. Basak , P. Battaglia
show 160 more authors
E. Battaner K. Benabed A. Benoit-L\'evy J.-P. Bernard M. Bersanelli P. Bielewicz A. Bonaldi L. Bonavera J. R. Bond J. Borrill C. Burigana R. C. Butler E. Calabrese A. Catalano P. R. Christensen L. P. L. Colombo M. Cruz A. Curto F. Cuttaia L. Danese R. D. Davies R. J. Davis P. de Bernardis A. de Rosa G. de Zotti J. Delabrouille C. Dickinson J. M. Diego O. Dor\'e A. Ducout X. Dupac F. Elsner T. A. En{\ss}lin H. K. Eriksen F. Finelli M. Frailis C. Franceschet E. Franceschi S. Galeotta S. Galli K. Ganga T. Ghosh M. Giard Y. Giraud-H\'eraud E. Gjerl{\o}w J. Gonz\'alez-Nuevo K. M. G\'orski A. Gregorio A. Gruppuso F. K. Hansen D. L. Harrison C. Hern\'andez-Monteagudo D. Herranz S. R. Hildebrandt E. Hivon M. Hobson A. Hornstrup W. Hovest K. M. Huffenberger G. Hurier A. H. Jaffe T. R. Jaffe E. Keih\"aen R. Keskitalo K. Kiiveri T. S. Kisner J. Knoche N. Krachmalnicoff M. Kunz H. Kurki-Suonio G. Lagache J.-M. Lamarre M. Lattanzi C. R. Lawrence J. P. Leahy R. Leonardi F. Levrier P. B. Lilje M. Linden-V{\o}rnle V. Lindholm M. L\'opez-Caniego P. M. Lubin J. F. Mac\'ias-P\'erez B. Maffei G. Maggio D. Maino N. Mandolesi A. Mangilli M. Maris P. G. Martin E. Mart\'inez-Gonz\'alez S. Masi S. Matarrese P. R. Meinhold A. Mennella M. Migliaccio S. Mitra L. Montier G. Morgante D. Mortlock D. Munshi J. A. Murphy F. Nati P. Natoli F. Noviello F. Paci L. Pagano F. Pajot D. Paoletti B. Partridge F. Pasian T. J. Pearson O. Perdereau V. Pettorino F. Piacentini E. Pointecouteau G. Polenta G. W. Pratt J.-L. Puget J. P. Rachen M. Reinecke M. Remazeilles A. Renzi I. Ristorcelli G. Rocha C. Rosset M. Rossetti G. Roudier J. A. Rubi\~no-Mart\'in B. Rusholme M. Sandri D. Santos M. Savelainen D. Scott V. Stolyarov R. Stompor A.-S. Suur-Uski J.-F. Sygnet J. A. Tauber D. Tavagnacco L. Terenzi L. Toffolatti M. Tomasi M. Tristram M. Tucci G. Umana L. Valenziano J. Valiviita B. Van Tent T. Vassallo P. Vielva F. Villa L. A. Wade B. D. Wandelt R. Watson I. K. Wehus D. Yvon A. Zacchei J. P. Zibin A. Zonca
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords effectssystematicuncertaintiesdatamapspolarizationscalestemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present the current accounting of systematic effect uncertainties for the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) that are relevant to the 2015 release of the Planck cosmological results, showing the robustness and consistency of our data set, especially for polarization analysis. We use two complementary approaches: (i) simulations based on measured data and physical models of the known systematic effects; and (ii) analysis of difference maps containing the same sky signal ("null-maps"). The LFI temperature data are limited by instrumental noise. At large angular scales the systematic effects are below the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature power spectrum by several orders of magnitude. In polarization the systematic uncertainties are dominated by calibration uncertainties and compete with the CMB $E$-modes in the multipole range 10--20. Based on our model of all known systematic effects, we show that these effects introduce a slight bias of around $0.2\,\sigma$ on the reionization optical depth derived from the 70\,GHz $EE$ spectrum using the 30 and 353\,GHz channels as foreground templates. At 30\,GHz the systematic effects are smaller than the Galactic foreground at all scales in temperature and polarization, which allows us to consider this channel as a reliable template of synchrotron emission. We assess the residual uncertainties due to LFI effects on CMB maps and power spectra after component separation and show that these effects are smaller than the CMB amplitude at all scales. We also assess the impact on non-Gaussianity studies and find it to be negligible. Some residuals still appear in null maps from particular sky survey pairs, particularly at 30 GHz, suggesting possible straylight contamination due to an imperfect knowledge of the beam far sidelobes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Detectors for CLASS-W2: The second 90 GHz telescope of the Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor

    astro-ph.IM 2026-06 accept novelty 3.0

    A new 296-detector 90 GHz TES bolometer array for CLASS achieves uniform properties, 16 μK√s NET, 0.37 optical efficiency, and a 41% mapping speed boost after addressing blue-leak radiation.