REVIEW 2 cited by
RoadTracer: Automatic Extraction of Road Networks from Aerial Images
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Mapping road networks is currently both expensive and labor-intensive. High-resolution aerial imagery provides a promising avenue to automatically infer a road network. Prior work uses convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect which pixels belong to a road (segmentation), and then uses complex post-processing heuristics to infer graph connectivity. We show that these segmentation methods have high error rates because noisy CNN outputs are difficult to correct. We propose RoadTracer, a new method to automatically construct accurate road network maps from aerial images. RoadTracer uses an iterative search process guided by a CNN-based decision function to derive the road network graph directly from the output of the CNN. We compare our approach with a segmentation method on fifteen cities, and find that at a 5% error rate, RoadTracer correctly captures 45% more junctions across these cities.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Automatic Extraction of Road Networks by using Teacher-Student Adaptive Structural Deep Belief Network and Its Application to Landslide Disaster
A teacher-student adaptive deep belief network combined with a taboo search improves RoadTracer's road-network detection accuracy from about 40% to 89% on seven selected cities and detects available roads after a landslide.
-
Learning Isometric Embeddings of Road Networks using Multidimensional Scaling
The paper proposes combining multidimensional scaling with road-network graph embeddings as feature spaces for generalizable autonomous driving motion planning, but provides only a literature review and toy visualizat...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.