Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Rydberg Atom Electric Field Sensors as Linear Time-invariant Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Rydberg atom electric field sensor can be treated as a linear time-invariant system, yielding an analytic transfer function that reproduces full numerical frequency responses up to two orders of magnitude faster.

desk verdict Useful, honest LTI transfer-function paper for Rydberg sensor engineers, with a repairable gap in the formal perturbation expansion. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.00159 v1 pith:BWHWYZTC submitted 2025-04-30 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Neel Malvania , Garry Jacyna , Bonnie L. Schmittberger Marlow , Zachary N. Hardesty-Shaw , Kathryn L. Nicolich , Kelly M. Backes , Jamie L. MacLennan , Charles T. Fancher This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords Rydbergatomsensorselectricfieldsensinglineartime-invariantsystemsimpulseresponsetransferfunctionheterodynedetectiondensitymatrixRFcommunications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a Rydberg atom electric field sensor behaves as a linear time-invariant (LTI) system when the incident RF signal is weak compared to the local oscillator, and that this fact can be exploited to compute the sensor's response nearly 100 times faster than full numerical integration. Linearizing the Liouville-von Neumann equations around the steady-state operating point produces a transfer matrix whose elements give the probe transmission response directly. The paper shows this analytic impulse response reproduces frequency responses obtained by solving the full time-dependent equations of motion, for intermediate frequencies up to 10 MHz, and that arbitrary weak waveforms can be pushed through the sensor by convolution. If right, this gives RF engineers a rapid tool for evaluating bandwidth, sensitivity, and waveform fidelity in Rydberg receivers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the transfer matrix $G(\omega) \equiv (i\omega I - A)^{-1} B \vec{\rho}_{\mathrm{SS}}$, assembled from three pieces: the constant matrix $A$ of the linearized Liouville-von Neumann flow, the sparse matrix $B$ that couples only the Rydberg-Rydberg transition, and the steady-state density vector $\vec{\rho}_{\mathrm{SS}}$ set by the local oscillator and optical fields. The linearization step, in which the RF signal enters only through the first-order term $\Omega_{\mathrm{RF}}^{(1)}(t) B \vec{\rho}_{\mathrm{SS}}$, is what converts the sensor into an LTI system with $C=I$ and $D=0$. Doppler broadening is handled by writing $G(\omega;u)$ with velocity-shifted detunings and integrating over the Maxwell distribution, which avoids hundreds of separate numerical integrations.

What would settle it

Simulate one fixed atomic configuration with both the LTI transfer function and full time-dependent density-matrix integration while steadily increasing the ratio of RF signal amplitude to local oscillator amplitude; the point where the two responses diverge by more than the numerical fitting error marks the linearity ceiling, and if that ceiling lies below the signal strengths used in practice, the LTI model would not cover the intended operating regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the first-order perturbative response of the atom vapor, $\tilde{\vec{\rho}}^{(1)}(\omega) = (i\omega I - A)^{-1} B \vec{\rho}_{\mathrm{SS}} \tilde{\Omega}_{\mathrm{RF}}^{(1)}(\omega)$, is the complete linear response of the sensor, so the probe transmission obeys $\tilde{\rho}_{12}^{(1)}(\omega_{\mathrm{IF}}) = G(\omega_{\mathrm{IF}}) \tilde{\Omega}_{\mathrm{sig}}(\omega_{\mathrm{IF}})$ with $G(\omega_{\mathrm{IF}}) = [G_{1,2}(\omega) - G_{2,1}(\omega)]/2i$. The paper demonstrates that this transfer function, Doppler-averaged over thermal velocity classes, agrees with full numerical integration of the equations of motion across the tested intermediate-frequency band, and that the same impulse response can be convolved with a 16QAM waveform to reconstruct the received constellation, including under noise. This is presented as a new application: casting the atomic receiver as a textbook LTI system with standard state-space matrices, so that receiver engineering tools apply directly to Rydberg sensors.

Load-bearing premise

The approach stands or falls on the assumption that the neglected second-order term $\epsilon^2 \Omega_{\mathrm{RF}}^{(1)}(t) B \vec{\rho}^{(1)}(t)$ is negligible, i.e., that the RF signal is weak enough relative to the local oscillator that the linear response dominates; the paper states this premise but gives no quantitative bound on when it fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The frequency response of a Rydberg sensor can be computed in roughly a minute instead of hours, making parameter scans over detunings, Rabi frequencies, and decay rates practical.
  • Any weak RF waveform can be propagated through the sensor by convolution with the impulse response, so modulated formats such as QAM can be evaluated without solving the full equations of motion.
  • Key receiver metrics—instantaneous bandwidth, sensitivity, and linear-regime dynamic range—follow directly from $G(\omega_{\mathrm{IF}})$ and its extensions.
  • Doppler averaging becomes part of the analytic transfer function rather than a costly separate average over many numerical runs.
  • Because the sensor is now expressed in standard state-space form, established systems-engineering analyses of stability, noise, and saturation apply directly to Rydberg receivers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the rational form of $G(\omega)$ means its poles carry the sensor's transient time scales; pole-zero analysis could be used to design equalization filters that compensate the nonlinear phase response noted in the paper.
  • Since the paper explicitly sets aside the $\epsilon^2 \Omega_{\mathrm{RF}}^{(1)} B \vec{\rho}^{(1)}$ term, carrying that term to second order would produce predictions of intermodulation products and harmonic distortion, quantifying dynamic range in the nonlinear regime.
  • The unquantified linearity ceiling could be turned into a measured specification by sweeping the signal-to-local-oscillator amplitude ratio and recording where the LTI prediction first departs from full numerical integration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents an analytic linear-time-invariant (LTI) model for the response of a Rydberg-atom electric field sensor operated in a heterodyne configuration. The authors linearize the Liouville-von Neumann equation for a 4+1 level density matrix around the steady-state operating point, derive a state-space representation, and obtain the frequency-domain transfer function G(ω) = (iωI−A)^{-1} B ρ_SS. They validate the predicted probe-transmission response against full time-domain integration using RydIQule for one set of parameters, report a speedup of roughly two orders of magnitude, and demonstrate the approach on a 16QAM waveform.

Significance. The contribution is practically valuable: if the transfer function is accurate, it replaces hours of numerical integration with a minute-scale matrix evaluation and enables fast estimates of sensor bandwidth and waveform distortion. The derivation from Eq. 4 to Eq. 18 is straightforward, and the use of an independent numerical solver (RydIQule) as a benchmark is appropriate. The paper's reproducible parameter list in Appendix B is a strength. The main weaknesses are the incomplete definition of the small expansion parameter in Section II and the limited, amplitude-normalized validation; these are repairable and do not invalidate the underlying approach.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (5)-(8)] The perturbative expansion is not anchored to a physical small parameter. Eq. (7) sets E_RF^(1)(t)=E_LO cos(ω_IF t+φ), so the first-order input has the same amplitude as the zeroth-order LO term, and Eq. (8) contains a second-order term proportional to E_LO that does not vanish as the signal amplitude goes to zero. Consequently, the neglect of the ε^2 term in Eq. (11) is not justified by E_sig/E_LO being small. Please replace E_LO by E_sig in Eq. (7) (and drop or re-derive Eq. (8)) or otherwise define ε explicitly and show that the neglected term is O(ε^2) with ε=E_sig/E_LO.
  2. [Appendix B, "Transfer function model", Fig. 3] The numerical comparison is amplitude-normalized ("We normalize the amplitude response so that the DC response is set to unity"), which removes exactly the information needed to test the linear scaling of the output with the signal amplitude. I recommend reporting the un-normalized transfer functions or a quantitative relative-error curve, and repeating the comparison for at least two additional ratios E_sig/E_LO (e.g., 0.001 and 0.1) to map the linear regime boundary.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 3, Table II] The validation is limited to a single parameter set and no quantitative error metric is reported between the LTI and RydIQule transfer functions; the speedup claim rests on one wall-clock comparison (two hours versus a little over a minute). At minimum, state that the speedup is anecdotal, or add a second configuration with a different detuning or Rabi frequency to demonstrate generality.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (21)] The definition of f(u) contains an integral and no dependence on u; it should read f(u)=e^{-u^2}/√π. The Doppler-averaging formula in Eq. (24) uses the correct form.
  2. [Section VI heading] The appendix is titled "Apprendix VI" in the main text; please correct the spelling and numbering.
  3. [Table II] In Table II, the transit dephasing rate is listed as Γt but the text and Eq. (2) use γt; unify the notation throughout.
  4. [Fig. 3 caption and text] The phase response is described as "wrapped and shifted vertically," but the vertical shift is unspecified; please provide the unwrapped or shifted data so the reader can reproduce the comparison.
  5. [Reference [14]] Reference [14] is a Ph.D. thesis without a university or year; please complete the citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the LTI transfer function is derived algebraically from the Lindblad equation and checked against an independent numerical integration of the same equation, with no fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. Equations (5)-(13) linearize the Liouville-von Neumann equation by expanding the RF Rabi frequency and density matrix in a formal Taylor parameter ε, and Eq. (18) follows by direct algebra: G(ω) = (iωI - A)^{-1} B ρ_SS. No parameter is fitted to reproduce the later numerical results; A, B and ρ_SS are fixed by the model parameters in Table II. The comparison to RydIQule (Fig. 3) is an independent numerical integration of the same master equation, so it validates the LTI approximation without being a fitted-input-called-prediction. The 16QAM demonstration convolves a synthetic waveform with the derived impulse response; its constellation outputs are not used to adjust the model. Self-citations (e.g., Ref. 5) are contextual and not load-bearing, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. One substantive correctness concern exists but is not circularity: Eq. (7) writes the first-order field as E_LO cos(ω_IF t) rather than E_sig cos(ω_IF t), leaving ε's relation to the physical signal-to-LO ratio unstated; this weakens the formal justification for dropping the ε^2 term but does not make the result equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central LTI derivation itself adds no fitted parameters; all parameters in Table II are inputs from the model. The only hand-chosen quantities are the heuristic decoherence rates affecting the dummy state and transit dephasing, which are not measured. The dummy state is an invented modeling device with no independent evidence. The derivation relies on standard quantum optics assumptions (RWA, Markovian Lindblad dynamics) and on the weak-signal linearization.

free parameters (3)
  • gamma_t (transit dephasing rate) = 2π * 0.1 MHz
    Chosen by hand to represent dephasing from atoms moving through the laser beams; not measured.
  • gamma_dsg (dummy state decay) = 2π * 0.5 MHz
    Heuristic rate for population leaking from Rydberg states into the dummy state, intended to model collisional losses.
  • gamma_dsr (dummy state relaxation) = 2π * 0.1 MHz
    Heuristic rate for population returning from the dummy state to the ground state, set by hand to close the population cycle.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Rotating wave approximation is valid for the field detunings, decay rates, and Rabi frequencies used.
    Invoked in Section I to remove time-dependence from the Hamiltonian; valid when energy level spacings, decay rates, and driving strengths are small compared to field frequencies.
  • domain assumption The atomic vapor obeys a Markovian Lindblad master equation with the specified decay and dephasing operators.
    The density matrix evolution in Eq. 3 assumes Markovian noise and a fixed set of Lindblad channels.
  • domain assumption The five-level model with a dummy state captures the relevant physics of the Rydberg sensor.
    The dummy state is a heuristic tool, not derived from first principles; its rates are chosen by hand.
  • domain assumption The incident RF signal is weak enough that first-order perturbation theory is accurate and higher-order terms in Eq. 11 can be neglected.
    The linear regime premise stated in Section II; no quantitative bound is given.
  • domain assumption Doppler averaging can be represented by a one-dimensional Gaussian velocity distribution with fixed temperatures.
    Eqs. 21-24 integrate over a single velocity component and assume a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.
invented entities (1)
  • Dummy state |5⟩
    purpose: Non-physical extra level that collects population from excited Rydberg states and returns it to the ground state, closing the population cycle in the density matrix model.
    Introduced as a heuristic modeling tool (following ref. 15) with no direct physical counterpart; its rates are free parameters. It has no falsifiable prediction outside the simulation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rydberg Atom Electric Field Sensors as Linear Time-invariant Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BWHWYZTC

@misc{pith2026250500159,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rydberg Atom Electric Field Sensors as Linear Time-invariant Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BWHWYZTC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00159}
}
read the original abstract

Over the past decade, Rydberg atom electric field sensors have been under investigation as potential alternatives or complements to conventional antenna-based receivers for select applications in RF communications, remote sensing, and precision metrology. To understand the potential utility of these devices for various use cases, it is crucial to develop models that accurately predict key performance metrics such as instantaneous bandwidth and dynamic range. However, existing numerical models require solving a large set of coupled differential equations that is computationally intensive and lengthy to solve. We present an analytic approach that can be used to derive an impulse response function that allows up to two orders-of-magnitude reduction in computation time compared to the full time-dependent integration of the equations of motion. This approach can be used to enable rapid assessments of the Rydberg sensor's response to various waveforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00159 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A) 4 level Rydberg sensor model with an additional non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Top) A block diagram for a linear system in the state-space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. An example of a transfer function for a 4+1 level Rydberg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Analysis of the reception of a 16QAM waveform. An exam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Examples of time-domain responses to a weak input sig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. A segment of a 16QAM in the time-domain with a large [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. O. Young, ``Synthetic structure of industrial plastics,'' in Plastics, 2 nd ed., vol. 3, J. Peters, Ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1964, pp. 15--64

    work page 1964

  2. [2]

    Chen, Linear Networks and Systems

    W.-K. Chen, Linear Networks and Systems. Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth, 1993, pp. 123--135

    1993

  3. [3]

    J. U. Duncombe, ``Infrared navigation---Part I: An assessment of feasibility,'' IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. ED-11, no. 1, pp. 34--39, Jan. 1959, DOI 10.1109/TED.2016.2628402

    work page arXiv 1959

  4. [4]

    E. P. Wigner, ``Theory of traveling-wave optical laser,'' Phys. Rev., vol. 134, pp. A635--A646, Dec. 1965, DOI 10.1109.XXX.123456

    work page 1965

  5. [5]

    E. H. Miller, ``A note on reflector arrays,'' IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., to be published

    work page

  6. [6]

    E. E. Reber, R. L. Michell, and C. J. Carter, ``Oxygen absorption in the earth's atmosphere,'' Aerospace Corp., Los Angeles, CA, USA, Tech. Rep. TR-0200 (4230-46)-3, Nov. 1988

    1988

  7. [7]

    J. H. Davis and J. R. Cogdell, ``Calibration program for the 16-foot antenna,'' Elect. Eng. Res. Lab., Univ. Texas, Austin, TX, USA, Tech. Memo. NGL-006-69-3, Nov. 15, 1987

    1987

  8. [8]

    Transmission Systems for Communications, 3 rd ed., Western Electric Co., Winston-Salem, NC, USA, 1985, pp. 44--60

    work page 1985

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Motorola Semiconductor Data Manual, Motorola Semiconductor Products Inc., Phoenix, AZ, USA, 1989

    1989

  2. [10]

    G. O. Young, ``Synthetic structure of industrial plastics,'' in Plastics, vol. 3, Polymers of Hexadromicon, J. Peters, Ed., 2 nd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1964, pp. 15-64. [Online]. Available: http://www.bookref.com

    1964

  3. [11]

    Kurland and Ralph Lerner, eds., Chicago, IL, USA: Univ

    The Founders' Constitution, Philip B. Kurland and Ralph Lerner, eds., Chicago, IL, USA: Univ. Chicago Press, 1987. [Online]. Available: http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/

    1987

  4. [12]

    ZOmega Terahertz Corp., 2014

    The Terahertz Wave eBook. ZOmega Terahertz Corp., 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dl.z-thz.com/eBook/zomega\_ebook\_pdf\_1206\_sr.pdf . Accessed on: May 19, 2014

    2014

  5. [13]

    Kurland and Ralph Lerner, eds., The Founders' Constitution

    Philip B. Kurland and Ralph Lerner, eds., The Founders' Constitution. Chicago, IL, USA: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1987, Accessed on: Feb. 28, 2010, [Online] Available: http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/

    1987

  6. [14]

    J. S. Turner, ``New directions in communications,'' IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 11-23, Jan. 1995, DOI 10.1109.XXX.123456

    1995

  7. [15]

    W. P. Risk, G. S. Kino, and H. J. Shaw, ``Fiber-optic frequency shifter using a surface acoustic wave incident at an oblique angle,'' Opt. Lett., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 115--117, Feb. 1986, DOI 10.1109.XXX.123456

    1986

  8. [16]

    Kopyt et al., ``Electric properties of graphene-based conductive layers from DC up to terahertz range,'' IEEE THz Sci

    P. Kopyt et al., ``Electric properties of graphene-based conductive layers from DC up to terahertz range,'' IEEE THz Sci. Technol., to be published. DOI: 10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2544142

    2016

  9. [17]

    Intranets: Internet technologies deployed behind the firewall for corporate productivity

    PROCESS Corporation, Boston, MA, USA. Intranets: Internet technologies deployed behind the firewall for corporate productivity. Presented at INET96 Annual Meeting. [Online]. Available: http://home.process.com/Intranets/wp2.htp

  10. [18]

    R. J. Hijmans and J. van Etten, ``Raster: Geographic analysis and modeling with raster data,'' R Package Version 2.0-12, Jan. 12, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster

    2012

  11. [19]

    Lytera UG, Kirchhain, Germany [Online]

    Teralyzer. Lytera UG, Kirchhain, Germany [Online]. Available: http://www.lytera.de/Terahertz\_THz\_Spectroscopy.php?id=home , Accessed on: Jun. 5, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    U.S. House. 102 nd Congress, 1 st Session. (1991, Jan. 11). H. Con. Res. 1, Sense of the Congress on Approval of Military Action. [Online]. Available: LEXIS Library: GENFED File: BILLS

    1991

  13. [21]

    Musical toothbrush with mirror, by L.M.R. Brooks. (1992, May 19). Patent D 326 189 [Online]. Available: NEXIS Library: LEXPAT File: DES

    1992

  14. [22]

    D. B. Payne and J. R. Stern, ``Wavelength-switched pas- sively coupled single-mode optical network,'' in Proc. IOOC-ECOC, Boston, MA, USA, 1985, pp. 585--590, DOI 10.1109.XXX.123456

    1985

  15. [23]

    Ebehard and E

    D. Ebehard and E. Voges, ``Digital single sideband detection for interferometric sensors,'' presented at the 2 nd Int. Conf. Optical Fiber Sensors, Stuttgart, Germany, Jan. 2-5, 1984

    1984

  16. [24]

    Brandli and M

    G. Brandli and M. Dick, ``Alternating current fed power supply,'' U.S. Patent 4 084 217, Nov. 4, 1978

    1978

  17. [25]

    J. O. Williams, ``Narrow-band analyzer,'' Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Eng., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993

    1993

  18. [26]

    Kawasaki, ``Parametric study of thermal and chemical nonequilibrium nozzle flow,'' M.S

    N. Kawasaki, ``Parametric study of thermal and chemical nonequilibrium nozzle flow,'' M.S. thesis, Dept. Electron. Eng., Osaka Univ., Osaka, Japan, 1993

    1993

  19. [27]

    Harrison, private communication, May 1995

    A. Harrison, private communication, May 1995

    1995

  20. [28]

    Smith, ``An approach to graphs of linear forms,'' unpublished

    B. Smith, ``An approach to graphs of linear forms,'' unpublished

  21. [29]

    Brahms, ``Representation error for real numbers in binary computer arithmetic,'' IEEE Computer Group Repository, Paper R-67-85

    A. Brahms, ``Representation error for real numbers in binary computer arithmetic,'' IEEE Computer Group Repository, Paper R-67-85

  22. [30]

    IEEE Criteria for Class IE Electric Systems, IEEE Standard 308, 1969

    1969

  23. [31]

    Letter Symbols for Quantities, ANSI Standard Y10.5-1968

    1968

  24. [32]

    Fardel, M

    R. Fardel, M. Nagel, F. Nuesch, T. Lippert, and A. Wokaun, ``Fabrication of organic light emitting diode pixels by laser-assisted forward transfer,'' Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 91, no. 6, Aug. 2007, Art. no. 061103, DOI. 10.1109.XXX.123456

    2007

  25. [33]

    Zhang and N

    J. Zhang and N. Tansu, ``Optical gain and laser characteristics of InGaN quantum wells on ternary InGaN substrates,'' IEEE Photon. J., vol. 5, no. 2, Apr. 2013, Art. no. 2600111, DOI. 10.1109.XXX.123456

    2013

  26. [34]

    Azodolmolky et al., Experimental demonstration of an impairment aware network planning and operation tool for transparent/translucent optical networks,'' J

    S. Azodolmolky et al., Experimental demonstration of an impairment aware network planning and operation tool for transparent/translucent optical networks,'' J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 439--448, Sep. 2011, DOI. 10.1109.XXX.123456

    2011

  27. [35]

    author author M. T. \ Simons , author A. B. \ Artusio-Glimpse , author C. L. \ Holloway , author E. Imhof , author S. R. \ Jefferts , author R. Wyllie , author B. C. \ Sawyer , \ and\ author T. G. \ Walker ,\ title title Continuous radio-frequency electric-field detection thro...

    doi

  28. [36]

    author author S. M. \ Bohaichuk , author D. Booth , author K. Nickerson , author H. Tai , \ and\ author J. P. \ Shaffer ,\ title title Origins of rydberg-atom electrometer transient response and its impact on radio-frequency pulse sensing , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.034030 j...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Schmidt , author S

    author author M. Schmidt , author S. Bohaichuk , author V. Venu , author F. Christaller , author C. Liu , author F. Ripka , author H. K\" u bler , \ and\ author J. P. \ Shaffer ,\ title title Rydberg-atom-based radio-frequency sensors: amplitude-regime sensing , \ 10.1364/OE.5...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Holloway , author M

    author author C. Holloway , author M. Simons , author A. H. \ Haddab , author J. A. \ Gordon , author D. A. \ Anderson , author G. Raithel , \ and\ author S. Voran ,\ title title A multiple-band rydberg atom-based receiver: Am/fm stereo reception , \ 10.1109/MAP.2020.2976914 j...

  31. [39]

    author author C. T. \ Fancher , author D. R. \ Scherer , author M. C. S. \ John , \ and\ author B. L. S. \ Marlow ,\ title title Rydberg atom electric field sensors for communications and sensing , \ 10.1109/TQE.2021.3065227 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Quantum Enginee...

    2021

  32. [40]

    author author M. T. \ Simons , author A. B. \ Artusio-Glimpse , author A. K. \ Robinson , author N. Prajapati , \ and\ author C. L. \ Holloway ,\ title title Rydberg atom-based sensors for radio-frequency electric field metrology, sensing, and communications , \ https://doi.or...

  33. [41]

    author author D. H. \ Meyer , author B. N. \ Miller , author T. Virtanen , author C. M. \ O'Brien , \ and\ author K. C. \ Cox ,\ title title Rydiqule: Graph-based modeling of atomic systems , \ in\ 10.1364/CLEO_FS.2024.FTu4L.4 booktitle CLEO 2024 \ ( publisher Optica Publishin...

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    William L

    author author J. William L. Hallauer ,\ @noop title Introduction to Linear, Time-invariant systems, Dynamic Systems for Students of Engineering \ ( publisher A.T. Still University ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  35. [43]

    author author D. F. \ Delchamps ,\ @noop title State Space and input-output linear systems \ ( publisher Springer-Verlag ,\ year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988

  36. [44]

    author author J. P. \ Hespanha ,\ @noop title Linear Systems Theory \ ( publisher Princeton Press ,\ address Princeton, New Jersey ,\ year 2018 )\ note iSBN13: 9780691179575 NoStop

    2018

  37. [45]

    author author M. T. \ Simons , author A. H. \ Haddab , author J. A. \ Gordon , \ and\ author C. L. \ Holloway ,\ title title A Rydberg atom-based mixer: Measuring the phase of a radio frequency wave , \ 10.1063/1.5088821 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 114 ,\ ...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Jing , author Y

    author author M. Jing , author Y. Hu , author J. Ma , author H. Zhang , author L. Zhang , author L. Xiao , \ and\ author S. Jia ,\ title title Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed rydberg spectroscopy , \ 10.1038/s41567-020-0918-5 journal journal Nature P...

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author D. H. \ Meyer , author Z. A. \ Castillo , author K. C. \ Cox , \ and\ author P. D. \ Kunz ,\ title title Assessment of rydberg atoms for wideband electric field sensing , \ 10.1088/1361-6455/ab6051 journal journal Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optic...

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author R. C. \ Brown , author B. Kayim , author M. A. \ Viray , author A. R. \ Perry , author B. C. \ Sawyer , \ and\ author R. Wyllie ,\ title Very-high- and ultrahigh-frequency electric-field detection using high angular momentum Rydberg states ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.107...

    doi

  41. [49]

    author author J. A. \ Sedlacek ,\ @noop title Microwave and surface electrometry with rydberg atoms , \ ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  42. [50]

    Vajpayee , author V

    author author V. Vajpayee , author V. Becerra , author N. Bausch , author J. Deng , author S. Shimjith , \ and\ author A. J. \ Arul ,\ title title Dynamic modelling, simulation, and control design of a pressurized water-type nuclear power plant , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nu...

  43. [51]

    author author W. L. \ Luyben ,\ @noop title Chemical reactor design and control \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.