pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25727 · v1 · pith:BXJL2DKTnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

Probing High-redshift Intracluster Medium Using SKA

Ramananda Santra , Ruta Kale This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 20:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxy clustersintracluster mediummagnetic fieldsradio halosradio relicsSKAhigh-redshiftEl Gordo
0
0 comments X

The pith

El Gordo at redshift about 0.87 is proposed as an SKA target to map magnetic fields in the high-redshift intracluster medium.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Observations of galaxy clusters at redshifts greater than 0.6 have found diffuse radio sources with powers similar to those seen locally, which implies that magnetic fields in the hot gas between galaxies grew rapidly enough to suppress inverse Compton losses. This growth after only a few billion years after the Big Bang is difficult to reconcile with standard dynamo amplification timescales. The paper singles out the massive merging system El Gordo as an extreme test case where turbulence and shocks during cluster assembly can be studied in detail. It proposes using the Square Kilometre Array in staged deployments to obtain broadband continuum and polarisation data that reach physical scales of 20 to 30 kiloparsecs.

Core claim

Proposing El Gordo as a SKA science verification target will allow detailed studies of the ICM magnetic field structure and strength through broadband continuum and polarisation measurements with SKA-Low and SKA-Mid, across staged deployments starting from AA0.5 to AA4, reaching a physical resolution of about 20-30 kpc at our redshift of interest. Upcoming SKA surveys will build statistical samples of high-redshift clusters, enabling tests of different models of magnetic fields and cosmic rays in the formation of large-scale structure.

What carries the argument

Broadband continuum and polarisation measurements with SKA-Low and SKA-Mid on the El Gordo cluster across staged array deployments.

If this is right

  • Enables mapping of magnetic field structure and strength in a high-redshift merging cluster.
  • Achieves physical resolution of 20-30 kpc with SKA-Low and SKA-Mid.
  • Supports observations from early deployment stages AA0.5 onward to full AA4.
  • Builds statistical samples of high-redshift clusters via SKA surveys.
  • Permits tests of models for magnetic fields and cosmic rays during large-scale structure formation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of strong fields at high redshift would require magnetic amplification mechanisms that operate on shorter timescales than current dynamo models allow.
  • Data on merging systems like El Gordo could clarify the specific contribution of shocks and turbulence to field growth.
  • Statistical samples from SKA could reveal whether rapid amplification depends on cluster mass or merger activity.
  • Combining the radio maps with multi-wavelength data on cluster dynamics could test links between magnetic fields and cosmic-ray acceleration.

Load-bearing premise

The premise that radio powers in clusters at redshifts of 0.6 and higher being comparable to nearby systems indicates efficient magnetic amplification that suppressed inverse Compton losses and thereby challenges standard dynamo timescales.

What would settle it

SKA polarisation measurements of El Gordo that yield magnetic field strengths too low to suppress inverse Compton losses at the observed radio powers would falsify the rapid-amplification interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25727 by Ramananda Santra, Ruta Kale.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: uGMRT 372 MHz image of El Gordo in cyan (red -ve) contours [-0.1,0.1,0.2,...mJy beam−1 ] and MeerKAT 1.28 GHz image in yellow contours [15, 30, ... 𝜇Jy beam−1 ] on the Chandra X-ray image shown in colour. Dashed lines mark the two tails seen in the X-ray. The image is reproduced from Kale et al. 2025. alone cannot explain the observed micro-Gauss fields, suggesting it primarily acts as a secondary amplifie… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The schematic integrated spectrum for the different diffuse structures in the El-Gordo is shown with SKA-Low and SKA-Mid bands specified. The flux density values for each of the diffuse sources are taken from the Kale et al. 2025 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Minimum power of RHs detectable at 150 MHz as a function of redshift is shown. The solid line indicates the detectability for different spectral indices. The minimum radio power has been computed according to Eqs. 1. Right: The same is shown here at the SKA-MID frequency, with the same spectral index values (each dotted curve). Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT; Calabrese et al., 2025). At high redshi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cluster mass–redshift distribution illustrating the discovery space for diffuse radio emission studies. The plotted plane shows 𝑀500 (in units of 1014𝑀⊙) as a function of redshift, highlighting the parameter space covered by major high-redshift multi-wavelength surveys in the X-ray and SZ (Bulbul et al., 2024; Bocquet et al., 2019). The location of El Gordo is marked for reference. The black line indicates… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Galaxy clusters host vast reservoirs of magnetised plasma in their intracluster medium (ICM), where turbulence and shocks generated during structure formation sometimes give rise to diffuse synchrotron emission in the form of radio halos and relics. However, the origin and amplification of the magnetic field in the ICM remains among the least understood problems, particularly at high redshift, where direct detections are scarce. Recent observations of clusters at z $\gtrsim 0.6$ have revealed radio powers of the diffuse sources comparable to those of nearby systems, implying that efficient magnetic amplification suppressed inverse Compton losses. Such rapid growth of the magnetic fields after a few Gyrs of the Big Bang challenges standard dynamo timescales, and it raises fundamental questions about the mechanisms that strengthened cluster magnetic fields. In this chapter, we highlight the massive merging system El Gordo (ACT-CL J0102$-$4915, z$\sim$0.87) as a unique testbed for investigating theoretical models under extreme conditions. Proposing as a SKA science verification target, El Gordo will allow detailed studies of the ICM magnetic field structure, strength through broadband continuum and polarisation measurements with SKA-Low and SKA-Mid, across staged deployments starting from AA0.5 to AA4, reaching a physical resolution of $\sim$ 20-30 kpc at our redshift of interest. We further outline how upcoming SKA surveys will build statistical samples of high-redshift clusters, enabling tests of different models of magnetic fields and cosmic rays in the formation of large-scale structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes El Gordo (ACT-CL J0102−4915, z∼0.87) as a SKA science verification target for studying high-redshift ICM magnetic fields via broadband continuum and polarization measurements with SKA-Low and SKA-Mid across AA0.5 to AA4 deployments. It is motivated by the claim that radio powers of diffuse sources in z≳0.6 clusters are comparable to nearby systems, implying efficient magnetic amplification that suppressed inverse-Compton losses and challenges standard dynamo timescales. The paper outlines how these observations can reach ∼20-30 kpc physical resolution and enable statistical samples from future SKA surveys.

Significance. If the premise on high-redshift radio powers holds after consistent reanalysis, the proposed observations could deliver important constraints on magnetic field amplification mechanisms and cosmic-ray processes in extreme merging clusters at early cosmic times, testing dynamo models under conditions not accessible at low redshift.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: The central motivation asserts that 'radio powers of the diffuse sources comparable to those of nearby systems' at z≳0.6 imply efficient B-field amplification suppressing IC losses and challenging dynamo timescales, but the manuscript contains no re-derivation, volume correction, spectral-index homogenization, or explicit citation list for the high-z luminosities. This leaves the load-bearing premise unverified within the paper.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The required magnetic field strength to exceed B_CMB(z=0.87) is not quantified, nor is any estimate provided for the polarization fraction or continuum surface brightness sensitivity needed to detect the implied amplification; without these, the scientific justification for targeting El Gordo remains qualitative.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The stated physical resolution of ∼20-30 kpc at z∼0.87 is given for staged SKA deployments but is not derived from array configuration, observing frequency, or baseline length, so the claim that SKA will resolve ICM structures at this scale cannot be assessed from the manuscript.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The sentence 'In this chapter, we highlight...' is inconsistent with a standalone manuscript; revise to 'In this work...' or equivalent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be improved. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: The central motivation asserts that 'radio powers of the diffuse sources comparable to those of nearby systems' at z≳0.6 imply efficient B-field amplification suppressing IC losses and challenging dynamo timescales, but the manuscript contains no re-derivation, volume correction, spectral-index homogenization, or explicit citation list for the high-z luminosities. This leaves the load-bearing premise unverified within the paper.

    Authors: We agree that the central motivation requires better support within the manuscript. In the revised version, we will add an explicit list of citations for the high-redshift radio power measurements in §1, along with a note on the spectral index assumptions and any volume corrections used in the literature. While we do not perform a full re-derivation here as it is beyond the scope of this proposal paper, we will ensure the premise is traceable to the cited works. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The required magnetic field strength to exceed B_CMB(z=0.87) is not quantified, nor is any estimate provided for the polarization fraction or continuum surface brightness sensitivity needed to detect the implied amplification; without these, the scientific justification for targeting El Gordo remains qualitative.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative estimates would strengthen the justification. We will revise the abstract and relevant sections to include the calculation of B_CMB at z=0.87, typical values for the magnetic field amplification needed, expected polarization fractions from similar systems, and the required surface brightness sensitivity for SKA detections based on standard models. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The stated physical resolution of ∼20-30 kpc at z∼0.87 is given for staged SKA deployments but is not derived from array configuration, observing frequency, or baseline length, so the claim that SKA will resolve ICM structures at this scale cannot be assessed from the manuscript.

    Authors: We agree that the resolution should be explicitly derived. In the revised manuscript, we will provide the derivation of the physical resolution, including the angular resolution from the array configurations and baselines at the observing frequencies for SKA-Low and SKA-Mid, and the conversion to physical scale at z∼0.87 using the adopted cosmology. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward-looking observational proposal with no derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a science verification proposal for SKA observations of El Gordo. It cites external prior observations of high-z radio powers to motivate the target choice but performs no re-derivation, fitting, volume correction, or prediction of those luminosities. No equations, ansatze, uniqueness theorems, or fitted parameters appear. The central claim is simply that the cluster is a suitable testbed; this does not reduce to any input by construction. Self-citation is absent. This is the normal case of an honest non-finding for a proposal-style paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational proposal paper with no mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, background axioms, or postulated entities; the central content rests on cited prior observations and standard telescope capabilities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5808 in / 1200 out tokens · 32741 ms · 2026-06-25T20:15:29.513073+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S., Genel, S., et al

    E.Asencio,I.Banik,andP.Kroupa. MNRAS,500(4):5249–5267,Jan.2021. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ staa3441. E. Asencio, I. Banik, and P. Kroupa.The Astrophysical Journal, 954(2):162, sep

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/ 2021

  2. [2]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ace62a

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace62a. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ace62a. A. Beresnyak and F. Miniati. ApJ, 817(2):127, Feb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace62a

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/127. S. Bocquet et al. ApJ, 878(1):55, June

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/817/2/127

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f10. A. Bonafede et al.MNRAS, 444:L44–L48, Oct

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f10

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu110. A. Botteon, F. Gastaldello, G. Brunetti, and R. Kale. MNRAS, 463:1534–1542, Dec

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu110

  6. [6]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2089. A. Botteon et al. A&A, 660:A78, Apr

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2089

  7. [7]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202143020. A. Brandenburg and K. Subramanian. Phys. Rep., 417(1-4):1–209, Oct

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202143020

  8. [8]

    Queipo, Raphael T

    doi: 10.1016/j. physrep.2005.06.005. M. Brüggen and F. Vazza. MNRAS, 493(2):2306–2317, Apr

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2005

  9. [9]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa418. G. Brunetti and T. W. Jones.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 23:1430007, Mar

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa418

  10. [10]

    doi: 10.1142/S0218271814300079. E. Bulbul et al. A&A, 685:A106, May

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271814300079

  11. [11]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348264. 12 El-Gordo with SKA Santra et al. E. Calabrese et al.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2503.14454, Mar

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348264

  12. [12]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503. 14454. R.Cassanoetal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSquareKilometreArray(AASKA14),page73, Apr

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503

  13. [13]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0073. R. Cassano et al. ApJ, 881(1):L18, Aug

    work page doi:10.22323/1.215.0073

  14. [14]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab32ed. R. Cassano et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab32ed 2041

  15. [15]

    V.Cucitietal

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039208. V.Cucitietal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch: Report number AASKAII/Cuciti01. P.E.Dewdney,P.J.Hall,R.T.Schilizzi,andT.J.L.W.Lazio.IEEEProceedings,97(8):1482–1496, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039208 2026

  16. [16]

    G.DiGennaroetal.NatureAstronomy,5:268–275,Jan.2021

    doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2021005. G.DiGennaroetal.NatureAstronomy,5:268–275,Jan.2021. doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-01244-5. G. Di Gennaro et al. A&A, 695:A215, Mar

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2009.2021005 2009

  17. [17]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453203. K. Dolag, M. Bartelmann, and H. Lesch. A&A, 348:351–363, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453203

  18. [18]

    Evolution and structure of magnetic fields in simulated galaxy clusters

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv. astro-ph/0202272. J. Donnert, F. Vazza, M. Brüggen, and J. ZuHone. Space Sci. Rev., 214(8):122, Dec

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv

  19. [19]

    doi: 10.1007/s11214-018-0556-8. S. W. Duchesne et al. PASA, 38:e010, Mar

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0556-8

  20. [20]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2021.7. S. W. Duchesne et al. PASA, 41:e026, Jan

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.7 2021

  21. [21]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2024.10. R. Durrer and A. Neronov. A&A Rev., 21:62, June

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.10 2024

  22. [22]

    doi: 10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7. L. Feretti, G. Giovannini, F. Govoni, and M. Murgia.AApR, 20:54, May

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0062-7

  23. [23]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acd929

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd929. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acd929. S. R. Furlanetto and A. Loeb. ApJ, 556(2):619–634, Aug

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd929

  24. [24]

    doi: 10.1086/321630. G. Heald et al.Galaxies, 8(3):53, July

    work page doi:10.1086/321630

  25. [25]

    doi: 10.3390/galaxies8030053. Y. Hu et al.Nature Communications, 15:1006, Feb

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies8030053

  26. [26]

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45164-8. L. Iapichino and M. Brüggen. MNRAS, 423(3):2781–2788, July

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45164-8

  27. [27]

    2012.21704.x

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2012.21084.x. M. J. Jee et al. ApJ, 785:20, Apr

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966 2012

  28. [28]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/20. R. Kale et al. A&A, 557:A99, Sept

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/785/1/20

  29. [29]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321515. R. Kale et al. A&A, 579:A92, July

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321515

  30. [30]

    13 El-Gordo with SKA Santra et al

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525695. 13 El-Gordo with SKA Santra et al. R. Kale et al. MNRAS, 514(4):5969–5986, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525695

  31. [31]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1649. R. Kale et al. A&A, 698:A271, June

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1649

  32. [32]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452621. J. Kim et al.The Astrophysical Journal, 923(1):101, dec

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452621

  33. [33]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac294f

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac294f. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac294f. K. Knowles et al. MNRAS, 504(2):1749–1758, June

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac294f

  34. [34]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab939. K. Knowles et al. A&A, 657:A56, Jan

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab939

  35. [35]

    The universal growth of magnetic energy during the nonlinear phase of subsonic and supersonic small-scale dynamos

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141488. N.Krieletal.arXive-prints,art.arXiv:2509.09949,Sept.2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.09949. P. P. Kronberg et al. ApJ, 676(1):70–79, Mar

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141488 2025

  36. [36]

    doi: 10.1086/527281. M. W. Kunz, A. A. Schekochihin, and J. M. Stone. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112(20):205003, May

    work page doi:10.1086/527281

  37. [37]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.205003. M. A. Latif, D. R. G. Schleicher, W. Schmidt, and J. Niemeyer. MNRAS, 432(1):668–678, June

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.205003

  38. [38]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt503. K. Lehle et al.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2507.12517, July

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt503

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.12517. R. R. Lindner et al. ApJ, 786:49, May

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.12517

  40. [40]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/49. F. Loi et al. A&A, 694:A125, Feb

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/49

  41. [41]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451711. F. Menanteau et al. ApJ, 748:7, Mar

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451711

  42. [42]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/7. F. Miniati. ApJ, 800(1):60, Feb

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/7

  43. [43]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/60. S. Mtchedlidze et al. ApJ, 944(1):100, Feb

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/1/60

  44. [44]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb04d. K. Y. Ng et al. MNRAS, 453(2):1531–1549, Oct

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb04d

  45. [45]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1713. S. P. O’Sullivan et al. MNRAS, 519(4):5723–5742, Mar

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1713

  46. [46]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3820. A. Pal et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3820

  47. [47]

    K.Roettiger,J.M.Stone,andJ.O.Burns

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1315. K.Roettiger,J.M.Stone,andJ.O.Burns. ApJ,518(2):594–602,June1999. doi: 10.1086/307298. D.Ryu,H.Kang,E.Hallman,andT.W.Jones.ApJ,593:599–610,Aug.2003.doi: 10.1086/376723. D. Ryu et al. Space Sci. Rev., 166(1-4):1–35, May 2012a. doi: 10.1007/s11214-011-9839-z. D. Ryu et al. Space Sci. Rev., 166(1-4):1–35, May 2012b. doi: 10.1007/s...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1315 2003

  48. [48]

    Turbulence and Magnetic Fields in Astrophysical Plasmas

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0507686. 14 El-Gordo with SKA Santra et al. A. Seta and C. Federrath. MNRAS, 499(2):2076–2086, Dec

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0507686 2076

  49. [49]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2978. T. W. Shimwell et al. VizieR Online Data Catalog: LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS) DR2(Shimwell+,2022). VizieROn-lineDataCatalog: J/A+A/659/A1.Originallypublishedin: 2022A&A...659A...1S, Feb

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2978 2022

  50. [50]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453410. K. Subramanian.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1809.03543, Sept

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453410

  51. [51]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1809. 03543. K. Subramanian, A. Shukurov, and N. E. L. Haugen. MNRAS, 366:1437–1454, Mar

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809

  52. [52]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09918.x. L. Tevlin et al. A&A, 701:A114, Sept

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09918.x 2006

  53. [53]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452823. R. J. van Weeren et al. Space Sci. Rev., 215(1):16, Feb

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452823

  54. [54]

    doi: 10.1007/s11214-019-0584-z. F. Vazza et al. A&A, 529:A17, May

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0584-z

  55. [55]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016015. F. Vazza et al. MNRAS, 459(1):70–83, June

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016015

  56. [56]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw584. T. Venturi et al.A&A, 484:327–340, June

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw584

  57. [57]

    L.M.Widrowetal

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809622. L.M.Widrowetal. SpaceSci.Rev.,166(1-4):37–70,May2012. doi: 10.1007/s11214-011-9833-5. H. Xu et al. ApJ, 698(1):L14–L17, June

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809622

  58. [58]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/L14. C. Zhang, Q. Yu, and Y. Lu. ApJ, 813:129, Nov

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/l14

  59. [59]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/129. 15

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/2/129