Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 58 references

First-principles approach to ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy in solids

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that photoinduced Coulomb screening, not Pauli blocking, drives the blue shift of core-exciton resonances in transient X-ray absorption spectra, while thermal lattice expansion shifts them red.

desk verdict Worth reading: the electronic transient-absorption machinery is credible and useful, but the thermal red-shift attribution rests on an unexplained change of scissor shift between 0 K and high T, so that claim needs a fixed-scissor check. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07612 v1 pith:BYILCB7H submitted 2025-09-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Lu Qiao , Ronaldo Rodrigues Pela , Claudia Draxl This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords pump-probespectroscopytransientabsorptionBethe-SalpeterequationCoulombscreeningcoreexcitonsWSe2CsPbBr3anataseTiO2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish a first-principles route to simulating ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy and to identifying the physical mechanisms behind transient X-ray absorption in solids. It computes excited-state carrier distributions with constrained DFT for thermalized carriers and real-time TDDFT for non-thermal carriers, then feeds them into a non-equilibrium Bethe-Salpeter equation for the absorption spectrum. Applied to WSe2, CsPbBr3, and anatase TiO2, the method reproduces measured transient spectra and separates the response into electronic and thermal parts. The central finding is that photoinduced Coulomb screening, not Pauli blocking, drives the blue shift of core-exciton resonances, while lattice heating shifts the spectra red.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the non-equilibrium Bethe-Salpeter equation, the two-particle equation whose eigenvalues give exciton energies and whose macroscopic dielectric function gives absorption. The novelty is that excited-state occupations enter selectively: occupations modify the screened Coulomb interaction to produce Coulomb screening, and the dipole transition coefficients to produce Pauli blocking, so the two mechanisms can be computed separately. The carrier distributions themselves are generated by constrained DFT for thermalized picosecond populations and real-time TDDFT for femtosecond non-thermal populations, in an all-electron full-potential implementation that treats core and

What would settle it

Recompute the picosecond thermal spectra with the scissor shift held at its 0 K value while keeping the expanded lattice; if the red shift disappears, then Eq. (2) is caused by the fitted scissor change rather than by lattice expansion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For three materials spanning different solid classes, the paper claims that the transient absorption spectrum at a core edge is quantitatively captured by a non-equilibrium Bethe-Salpeter calculation whose input occupations come from either thermal Fermi-Dirac constrained DFT or real-time TDDFT. In every case the dominant electronic contribution is Coulomb screening by photoexcited carriers: it weakens the electron-hole attraction, reduces exciton binding energies (in CsPbBr3 from about 360 meV to 90 meV at an excitation density of 3.2e21 cm^-3), and blue-shifts the resonances. Pauli blocking contributes negligibly on picosecond delays and only mildly on femtosecond delays. Heating the latti

Load-bearing premise

The thermal contribution is attributed entirely to homogeneous lattice expansion, yet the high-temperature spectra also use fitted scissor shifts that differ from the 0 K values; if those scissor changes drive the computed red shift, the paper's thermal mechanism is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In all three studied materials, transient X-ray absorption at core edges can be predicted from first principles, and the blue shift in measured spectra can be read as a signature of photoinduced Coulomb screening rather than Pauli blocking.
  • The drop in exciton binding energy with excitation density provides a quantitative link between pump fluence and resonance energy shift.
  • Thermal red shifts at picosecond delays are attributed to lattice expansion, so the method separates electronic carrier effects from lattice heating in the same spectrum.
  • Pump polarization and pump wavelength allow femtosecond-scale tuning of exciton resonances, raising the possibility of controlling screening without altering the material.
  • Carrier delocalization at higher carrier temperatures enhances screening, but this enhancement saturates around 500 K in all three materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Coulomb screening is the dominant measurable response, transient resonance shifts could serve as an in-situ probe of excited-carrier density and exciton binding energy in materials where direct transport measurements are difficult.
  • The paper's mechanism suggests a design rule: choosing a shorter pump wavelength increases carrier polarizability and screening, so pump color can tune the transient response independently of pump fluence.
  • The saturation of screening with carrier temperature hints that experimental temperature scans could directly test whether carrier delocalization or carrier density is the limiting factor for resonance shifts.
  • Because the method separates Pauli blocking from screening, it could be extended to valence-edge or infrared transient spectra where Pauli blocking is often assumed to be central; the present results suggest it may often be secondary.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a first-principles workflow for pump-probe transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy by combining constrained DFT (cDFT) and real-time TDDFT with a non-equilibrium Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) treatment. The method is implemented in the all-electron code exciting and applied to core-level TA spectra of three materials: the Se M-edge of WSe2, the Br K-edge of CsPbBr3, and the Ti K-edge of anatase TiO2. The electronic contribution is decomposed into Pauli blocking and Coulomb screening, and a thermal contribution is added by computing equilibrium-like spectra on homogeneously expanded lattices at elevated temperatures. The central claims are that (i) photoinduced Coulomb screening dominates the electronic response and produces a blue shift of core-exciton resonances, (ii) Pauli blocking is minor, and (iii) thermal lattice expansion produces a red shift. The paper also explores the dependence of TA spectra on excitation density, carrier distribution temperature, pump polarization, and pump wavelength.

Significance. If the central thermal claim is established, this would be a useful contribution: it provides an all-electron implementation, a transparent decomposition of electronic effects, and application to three distinct material classes with core-level sensitivity. The electronic part of the calculation is internally coherent: excited-state occupations enter the RPA screening and dipole weights, and a common scissor shift cancels in the difference spectra. The authors also provide data availability via NOMAD, which supports reproducibility. The main significance is conditional, however, because the thermal contribution is computed with different scissor shifts at elevated temperature, and the text does not explain their origin. The paper's 'first-principles' characterization is therefore not yet fully supported for the thermal component, which is a central claim rather than a peripheral detail.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (2) and SI Table I] The thermal contribution is defined as Imε(ω,T) − Imε_eq(ω), but SI Table I lists different scissor shifts at high temperature: WSe2 6.9→6.5 eV, CsPbBr3 163.5→162.0 eV, and TiO2 106.2→104.5 eV. The text does not state how the high-temperature scissor values are obtained. If they are fitted or adjusted to experimental high-temperature spectra, then the red shifts in Figs. 1b–3b are not a prediction from homogeneous lattice expansion; the scissor changes alone are 0.4–1.7 eV, comparable to or larger than the spectral shifts shown. The authors must either show that the high-temperature scissor is determined from first principles (e.g., from a quasiparticle calculation on the expanded lattice) or repeat the thermal calculation with the same scissor as the equilibrium reference, so that ΔImε(ω,T) isolates the lattice-expansion effect.
  2. [Methods and Figs. 1–3] The equilibrium spectra are aligned to experiment by material-specific scissor shifts (SI Table I), so the reported 'good agreement' and 'excellent agreement' with experiment is partly by construction for absolute peak positions. This is not by itself fatal for difference spectra, but it weakens the claim of a 'quantitative and predictive framework' and needs to be stated explicitly. The authors should clarify which conclusions depend on the fitted absolute energy scale and which are robust to the scissor choice. Ideally, they should show that the electronic TA spectra remain unchanged when a common scissor is used for the equilibrium and non-equilibrium calculations.
  3. [Method (IV) and Supplementary Section II] The thermal calculation is described only as 'homogeneous lattice expansion at this respective temperature.' The lattice parameters used for WSe2 at 700 K, CsPbBr3 at 350 K, and TiO2 at 798 K are not given, nor is the expansion recipe (linear versus volumetric, and whether the thermal expansion coefficients are experimental or computed). Without these details the thermal calculation is not reproducible, and one cannot separate the effect of lattice expansion from the changed scissor shifts. Report the expanded structures, the expansion procedure, and the scissor values derived from those structures.
minor comments (6)
  1. [CsPbBr3 section] The text refers to Fig. 3e and Fig. 3f when discussing carrier-temperature dependence in CsPbBr3; the corresponding panels for CsPbBr3 appear to belong to Fig. 2. Correct the cross-references.
  2. [WSe2 section] Typo: 'absprption' should be 'absorption' in the sentence beginning 'The top panels of Figs. 1a-b also show the impact of photoexcited carriers on the absprption spectra.'
  3. [Figs. 1c-d caption] Extra punctuation in 'as illustrated in Figs. 1c-d,.'—remove the comma after the figure reference.
  4. [Figure notation] The figures label the ordinate as 'Im M' while the text uses Imε. Use a consistent notation or define the conversion explicitly.
  5. [SI Table I] The BSE broadening for CsPbBr3 is listed as 2.4 eV, which is very large. Please justify this value and discuss its effect on the TA amplitudes and peak positions.
  6. [Methods] Spin-orbit coupling is neglected. For WSe2, justify this approximation for the Se M4,5-edge spectra, where spin-orbit effects may be relevant.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Thermal red-shift claim is partly determined by temperature-dependent scissor-shift inputs, not purely by lattice expansion; the electronic screening/Pauli-blocking decomposition is non-circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods; Eq. (2); SI Table I]
    "Thermal contributions were evaluated by computing absorption spectra for temperature-expanded lattices and subtracting the equilibrium spectrum. ... ∆Imε(ω,T) = Imε(ω,T)−Imε eq(ω) ... Scissor shift (eV) - 0 K 6.9 163.5 106.2; Scissor shift (eV) - high temperature 6.5 162.0 104.5"

    The thermal TA in Eq. (2) is a difference between Imε(ω,T) and Imε_eq. SI Table I shows that the high-temperature calculation uses a different scissor shift from the 0 K calculation for every material (WSe2 6.9→6.5 eV; CsPbBr3 163.5→162.0 eV; TiO2 106.2→104.5 eV). The paper never derives these high-temperature scissor values from the lattice expansion; they are input parameters. Therefore ΔImε(ω,T) includes the imposed scissor shift change, and since these changes (−0.4, −1.5, −1.7 eV) are comparable to or larger than the reported red shifts, the attribution of the red shift to homogeneous lattice expansion is at least partly an artifact of the fitted/adjusted input rather than a first-principles prediction.

full rationale

The electronic part of the paper is self-contained: Eq. (1) and Eqs. (S.14)-(S.18) compute the Pauli-blocking/Coulomb-screening decomposition directly from excited-state occupations and the BSE, and the carrier-density trends are not fitted. The comparison with measured TA spectra in Figs. 1-3 provides external evidence for the electronic claims. The main circularity concern is the thermal contribution. Eq. (2) is presented as a pure lattice-expansion effect, but the two spectra entering the difference are computed with different scissor shifts (SI Table I). Because the paper does not explain how the high-temperature scissor values are obtained, the thermal red shift is not cleanly separated from the imposed change in this adjustable parameter. This compromises central claim (iii) and the 'first-principles' characterization of the thermal result. The self-citation to Ref. [26] for prior ZnO validation is a supporting citation, not the load-bearing step for the new results, so it contributes little to the score.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard many-body machinery (BSE, RPA) plus three non-trivial modeling choices: how occupations enter the non-equilibrium BSE, the static-screening approximation, and lattice-expansion-only thermal modeling. The fitted scissor set is the main load-bearing free input.

free parameters (7)
  • Scissor shift WSe2 (0 K) = 6.9 eV
    Rigid shift aligning computed equilibrium XAS peak positions to experiment (SI Table I).
  • Scissor shift WSe2 (high T) = 6.5 eV
    Shift for the 700 K expanded lattice; differs from 0 K value, so the thermal red shift is partly fitted.
  • Scissor shift CsPbBr3 (0 K) = 163.5 eV
    Rigid shift for the Br K-edge XAS.
  • Scissor shift CsPbBr3 (high T) = 162.0 eV
    Shift for 350 K lattice; 1.5 eV difference contributes to the reported red shift.
  • Scissor shift TiO2 (0 K) = 106.2 eV
    Rigid shift for the Ti K-edge XAS.
  • Scissor shift TiO2 (high T) = 104.5 eV
    Shift for 798 K lattice; 1.7 eV difference.
  • BSE Lorentzian broadening = 0.2 eV (WSe2), 2.4 eV (CsPbBr3), 0.9 eV (TiO2)
    Linewidth parameters chosen to match spectral broadening; affect TA line shapes.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Non-equilibrium BSE extension: excited-state occupations from cDFT/RT-TDDFT can be inserted directly into the RPA dielectric (Eq. S.15) and dipole matrix elements (Eq. S.16) to model transient spectra.
    Central modeling step in Supplementary Note I; no formal derivation that this is the exact non-equilibrium two-particle propagator.
  • domain assumption Static screening approximation (W at omega=0) remains valid for the non-equilibrium dielectric response.
    Eq. S.14-S.15 use the static RPA screening; dynamic self-energy effects are neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper Thermal effects are captured solely by homogeneous lattice expansion at the elevated temperature.
    Main text step (IV); excludes phonon occupations, Debye-Waller factors, and electron-phonon renormalization.
  • domain assumption Pauli blocking is fully encoded by occupation-weighted dipole matrix elements; the BSE Hamiltonian diagonal and exchange terms are unmodified by occupations.
    Eq. S.16-S.17; the screening/Pauli separation is defined by this division, not derived from a full nonequilibrium theory.
  • domain assumption At picosecond delays, carrier populations follow thermalized Fermi-Dirac distributions with a common carrier temperature.
    Step (i) in the main text; used to generate cDFT occupations.
  • domain assumption PBE with scalar-relativistic ZORA and no spin-orbit coupling is a sufficient starting point for core-level BSE in these solids.
    Methods section; SOC neglected, which may matter for WSe2 band edges.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First-principles approach to ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy in solids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BYILCB7H

@misc{pith2026250907612,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First-principles approach to ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy in solids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BYILCB7H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07612}
}
abstract

Pump-probe spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study ultrafast exciton dynamics, revealing the underlying complex interactions on the electronic scale. Despite significant advances in experimental techniques, developing a comprehensive and rigorous theoretical framework for modeling and interpreting the transient response in photoexcited materials remains a challenge. Here, we present a first-principles approach to simulating pump-probe spectroscopy and disentangling the electronic and thermal contributions underlying exciton dynamics. We showcase our method to three materials, representative for different classes of solids: the transition-metal dichalcogenides WSe$_2$, the halide perovskite CsPbBr$_3$, and the transition-metal oxide TiO$_2$, showing remarkable agreement with experimental counterparts. We find that (i) photoinduced Coulomb screening is the primary electronic effect, responsible for a blue shift of exciton resonances, while (ii) Pauli blocking plays a minor role, and (iii) thermal lattice expansion leads to a red shift of the spectra. We further demonstrate how key parameters such as excitation density, pump photon energy, and pump polarization modulate the transient absorption spectra, offering direct control over the exciton-resonance energy. Our approach establishes a quantitative and predictive framework for interpreting pump-probe experiments, providing actionable insights for the design of energy-selective optoelectronic devices through exciton engineering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07612 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ashoka, R

    A. Ashoka, R. R. Tamming, A. V. Girija, H. Bretscher, S. D. Verma, S.-D. Yang, C.-H. Lu, J. M. Hodgkiss, D. Ritchie, C. Chen, et al., Extracting quantitative dielectric proper- ties from pump-probe spectroscopy, Nature Communica- tions13, 1437 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Beeby, Pump-probe laser spectroscopy, in An Introduction to Laser Spectroscopy: Second Edition (Springer, 2002) pp

    A. Beeby, Pump-probe laser spectroscopy, in An Introduction to Laser Spectroscopy: Second Edition (Springer, 2002) pp. 105–137

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Lucchini, S

    M. Lucchini, S. A. Sato, G. D. Lucarelli, B. Moio, G. Inzani, R. Borrego-Varillas, F. Frassetto, L. Poletto, H. H ¨ubener, U. De Giovannini, et al., Unravelling the intertwined atomic and bulk nature of localised excitons by attosecond spec- troscopy, Nature communications12, 1021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    T. R. Barends, A. Gorel, S. Bhattacharyya, G. Schir`o, C. Ba- cellar, C. Cirelli, J.-P. Colletier, L. Foucar, M. L. Gr ¨unbein, E. Hartmann, et al., Influence of pump laser fluence on ultrafast myoglobin structural dynamics, Nature626, 905 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Montanaro, F

    A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, M. Colja, G. Brajnik, A. Marciniak, R. Sergo, D. De Angelis, F. Glerean, G. Sparapassi, G. Jarc, et al., Visible pump–mid infrared pump–broadband probe: Development and characterization of a three-pulse setup for single-shot ultrafast spectroscopy at 50 khz, Review of Scientific Instruments91(2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Rebholz, T

    M. Rebholz, T. Ding, V. Despr ´e, L. Aufleger, M. Hartmann, K. Meyer, V. Stooß, A. Magunia, D. Wachs, P. Birk, et al., All-xuv pump-probe transient absorption spectroscopy of the structural molecular dynamics of di-iodomethane, Phys- ical Review X11, 031001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Geneaux, H

    R. Geneaux, H. J. Marroux, A. Guggenmos, D. M. Neu- mark, and S. R. Leone, Transient absorption spectroscopy using high harmonic generation: a review of ultrafast x-ray dynamics in molecules and solids, Philosophical Transac- tions of the Royal Society A377, 20170463 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Lindberg and S

    M. Lindberg and S. Koch, Theory of coherent transients in semiconductor pump–probe spectroscopy, Journal of the Optical Society of America B5, 139 (1988)

    work page 1988

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    W. T. Pollard, S.-Y. Lee, and R. A. Mathies, Wave packet theory of dynamic absorption spectra in femtosecond pump– probe experiments, The Journal of chemical physics92, 4012 (1990)

    1990

  2. [10]

    Y. J. Yan, W. Zhang, and J. Che, Time–frequency theory of pump-probe absorption spectroscopy, The Journal of chem- ical physics106, 2212 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    Wolfseder, L

    B. Wolfseder, L. Seidner, G. Stock, and W. Domcke, Fem- tosecond pump-probe spectroscopy of electron-transfer sys- tems: a nonperturbative approach, Chemical physics217, 275 (1997)

    1997

  4. [12]

    De Giovannini, G

    U. De Giovannini, G. Brunetto, A. Castro, J. Walkenhorst, and A. Rubio, Simulating pump–probe photoelectron and absorption spectroscopy on the attosecond timescale with time-dependent density functional theory, ChemPhysChem 14, 1363 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    C. Pemmaraju, Simulation of attosecond transient soft x-ray absorption in solids using generalized kohn–sham real-time time-dependent density functional theory, New Journal of Physics22, 083063 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Moitra, L

    T. Moitra, L. Konecny, M. Kadek, A. Rubio, and M. Repisky, Accurate relativistic real-time time-dependent density functional theory for valence and core attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy, The journal of physical 10 chemistry letters14, 1714 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Pabst, A

    S. Pabst, A. Sytcheva, A. Moulet, A. Wirth, E. Gouliel- makis, and R. Santra, Theory of attosecond transient- absorption spectroscopy of krypton for overlapping pump and probe pulses, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics86, 063411 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    A. S. Skeidsvoll, A. Balbi, and H. Koch, Time-dependent coupled-cluster theory for ultrafast transient-absorption spectroscopy, Physical Review A102, 023115 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Perfetto, D

    E. Perfetto, D. Sangalli, A. Marini, and G. Stefanucci, Nonequilibrium bethe-salpeter equation for transient pho- toabsorption spectroscopy, Physical Review B92, 205304 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Sangalli, S

    D. Sangalli, S. Dal Conte, C. Manzoni, G. Cerullo, and A. Marini, Nonequilibrium optical properties in semicon- ductors from first principles: A combined theoretical and experimental study of bulk silicon, Physical Review B93, 195205 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    J. Peng, C. Q. Xia, Y. Xu, R. Li, L. Cui, J. K. Clegg, L. M. Herz, M. B. Johnston, and Q. Lin, Crystallization of cspbbr3 single crystals in water for x-ray detection, Nature communications12, 1531 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Zheng, T

    Z. Zheng, T. Zhang, J. Yao, Y. Zhang, J. Xu, and G. Yang, Flexible, transparent and ultra-broadband photodetector based on large-area wse2 film for wearable devices, Nan- otechnology27, 225501 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    B. Yu, B. Zheng, X. Wang, F. Qi, J. He, W. Zhang, and Y. Chen, Enhanced photocatalytic properties of graphene modified few-layered wse2 nanosheets, Applied Surface Sci- ence400, 420 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Lewerenz, A

    H. Lewerenz, A. Heller, and F. DiSalvo, Relationship be- tween surface morphology and solar conversion efficiency of tungsten diselenide photoanodes, Journal of the American Chemical Society102, 1877 (1980)

    1980

  15. [23]

    Ullah, J

    S. Ullah, J. Wang, P. Yang, L. Liu, S.-E. Yang, T. Xia, H. Guo, and Y. Chen, All-inorganic cspbbr 3 perovskite: a promising choice for photovoltaics, Materials Advances2, 646 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Bauerhenne and M

    B. Bauerhenne and M. E. Garcia, Unified description of thermal and nonthermal laser-induced ultrafast structural changes in materials, Scientific Reports14, 32168 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Gulans, S

    A. Gulans, S. Kontur, C. Meisenbichler, D. Nabok, P. Pavone, S. Rigamonti, S. Sagmeister, U. Werner, and C. Draxl, Exciting: a full-potential all-electron package im- plementing density-functional theory and many-body per- turbation theory, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter...

    2014

  18. [26]

    T. C. Rossi, L. Qiao, C. P. Dykstra, R. Rodrigues Pela, R. Gnewkow, R. F. Wallick, J. H. Burke, E. Nicholas, A. M. March, G. Doumy, et al., Dynamic control of x-ray core- exciton resonances by coulomb screening in photoexcited semiconductors, Communications Materials6, 191 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Oh, H.-T

    J. Oh, H.-T. Chang, C. T. Chen, S. Aloni, A. Schwartzberg, and S. R. Leone, Carrier and Phonon Dynamics in Multi- layer WSe2 Captured by Extreme Ultraviolet Transient Ab- sorption Spectroscopy, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C127, 5004 (2023), 2211.08731

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    H. Ji, G. Lee, M.-K. Joo, Y. Yun, H. Yi, J.-H. Park, D. Suh, and S. C. Lim, Thickness-dependent carrier mo- bility of ambipolar mote2: Interplay between interface trap and coulomb scattering, Applied Physics Letters110, 10.1063/1.4982680 (2017)

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    Y. Niu, S. Gonzalez-Abad, R. Frisenda, P. Marauhn, M. Dr ¨uppel, P. Gant, R. Schmidt, N. S. Taghavi, D. Bar- cons, A. J. Molina-Mendoza, et al., Thickness-dependent differential reflectance spectra of monolayer and few-layer mos2, mose2, ws2 and wse2, Nanomaterials8, 725 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    A. V. Kolobov and J. Tominaga, Bulk tmdcs: Review of structure and properties, in Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016) pp. 29–77

    2016

  23. [31]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2d transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Reviews Materials2, 1 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseu- dospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Physics10, 343 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    Jariwala, A

    D. Jariwala, A. R. Davoyan, J. Wong, and H. A. At- water, Van der waals materials for atomically-thin pho- tovoltaics: Promise and outlook, ACS Photonics4, 2962 (2017), 1710.08917

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    W. Peng, Y. Li, F. Zhang, G. Zhang, and X. Fan, Roles of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides as co- catalysts in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution and environ- mental remediation, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Re- search56, 4611 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    M. Wu, Y. Xiao, Y. Zeng, Y. Zhou, X. Zeng, L. Zhang, and W. Liao, Synthesis of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides for electronics and optoelectronics, InfoMat 3, 362 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    W. Liu, J. Kang, D. Sarkar, Y. Khatami, D. Jena, and K. Banerjee, Role of metal contacts in designing high- performance monolayer n-type wse2 field effect transistors, Nano letters13, 1983 (2013)

    1983

  29. [37]

    Z. Wang, Q. Li, Y. Chen, B. Cui, Y. Li, F. Besenbacher, and M. Dong, The ambipolar transport behavior of wse2 transistors and its analogue circuits, NPG Asia Materials 10, 703 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Chuang, X

    H.-J. Chuang, X. Tan, N. J. Ghimire, M. M. Perera, B. Chamlagain, M. M.-C. Cheng, J. Yan, D. Mandrus, D. Tomanek, and Z. Zhou, High mobility wse2 p-and n-type field-effect transistors contacted by highly doped graphene for low-resistance contacts, Nano letters14, 3594 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    J. S. Ross, P. Klement, A. M. Jones, N. J. Ghimire, J. Yan, D. Mandrus, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, K. Kitamura, W. Yao, et al., Electrically tunable excitonic light-emitting diodes based on monolayer wse2 p–n junctions, Nature nan- otechnology9, 268 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Buades, A

    B. Buades, A. Pic ´on, E. Berger, I. Le ´on, N. D. Palo, S. L. Cousin, C. Cocchi, E. Pellegrin, J. H. Martin, S. Ma ˜nas- Valero, E. Coronado, T. Danz, C. Draxl, M. Uemoto, K. Ya- bana, M. Schultze, S. Wall, M. Z ¨urch, and J. Biegert, At- tosecond state-resolved carrier motio...

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Britz, A

    A. Britz, A. R. Attar, X. Zhang, H.-T. Chang, C. Nyby, A. Krishnamoorthy, S. H. Park, S. Kwon, M. Kim, D. Nord- lund, S. Sainio, T. F. Heinz, S. R. Leone, A. M. Lindenberg, A. Nakano, P. Ajayan, P. Vashishta, D. Fritz, M.-F. Lin, and U. Bergmann, Carrier-specific dynamics in 2...

    2021

  34. [42]

    Schumacher, S

    Z. Schumacher, S. A. Sato, S. Neb, A. Niedermayr, L. Gall- mann, A. Rubio, and U. Keller, Ultrafast electron local- ization and screening in a transition metal dichalcogenide, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, 11 e2221725120 (2023), 2210.05465

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    E. A. A. Pogna, M. Marsili, D. D. Fazio, S. D. Conte, C. Manzoni, D. Sangalli, D. Yoon, A. Lombardo, A. C. Fer- rari, A. Marini, G. Cerullo, and D. Prezzi, Photo-induced bandgap renormalization governs the ultrafast response of single-layer MoS2, ACS Nano10, 1182 (2016), 1704.06372

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    N. T. Duong, J. Lee, S. Bang, C. Park, S. C. Lim, and M. S. Jeong, Modulating the functions of mos2/mote2 van der waals heterostructure via thickness variation, ACS nano 13, 4478 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Best research-cell efficiency chart (2024), accessed: 2025-07-13

    2024

  38. [46]

    Y. Duan, G. Zhao, X. Liu, J. Ma, S. Chen, Y. Song, X. Pi, X. Yu, D. Yang, Y. Zhang, et al., Highly efficient and sta- ble inorganic cspbbr3 perovskite solar cells via vacuum co- evaporation, Applied Surface Science562, 150153 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    X. Liu, P. Zeng, S. Chen, T. A. Smith, and M. Liu, Charge transfer dynamics at the interface of cspbx3 perovskite nanocrystal-acceptor complexes: A femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy study, Laser & Photonics Reviews 16, 2200280 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Mondal and A

    N. Mondal and A. Samanta, Complete ultrafast charge carrier dynamics in photo-excited all-inorganic perovskite nanocrystals (cspbx 3), Nanoscale9, 1878 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Cannelli, N

    O. Cannelli, N. Colonna, M. Puppin, T. C. Rossi, D. Kin- schel, L. M. Leroy, J. L ¨offler, J. M. Budarz, A. M. March, G. Doumy, et al., Quantifying photoinduced polaronic distortions in inorganic lead halide perovskite nanocrys- tals, Journal of the American Chemical Society14...

    2021

  42. [50]

    Regan and M

    O. Regan and M. Gratzel, Light induced charge separation in nanocrystalline films, NATURE353, 737 (1991)

    1991

  43. [51]

    M. H. Rittmann-Frank, C. J. Milne, J. Rittmann, M. Rein- hard, T. J. Penfold, and M. Chergui, Mapping of the pho- toinduced electron traps in tio2 by picosecond x-ray absorp- tion spectroscopy, Angewandte Chemie International Edi- tion53, 5858 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    F. G. Santomauro, A. L ¨ubcke, J. Rittmann, E. Baldini, A. Ferrer, M. Silatani, P. Zimmermann, S. Gr ¨ubel, J. A. Johnson, S. O. Mariager, et al., Femtosecond x-ray absorp- tion study of electron localization in photoexcited anatase tio2, Scientific reports5, 14834 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    Kang and M

    W. Kang and M. S. Hybertsen, Quasiparticle and opti- cal properties of rutile and anatase tio 2, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82, 085203 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    Yabana, T

    K. Yabana, T. Sugiyama, Y. Shinohara, T. Otobe, and G. F. Bertsch, Time-dependent density functional theory for strong electromagnetic fields in crystalline solids, Physical Review B85, 045134 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Rodrigues Pela and C

    R. Rodrigues Pela and C. Draxl, All-electron full-potential implementation of real-time tddft in exciting, Electronic Structure3, 037001 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Rohlfing and S

    M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie, Electron-hole excitations and optical spectra from first principles, Physical Review B62, 4927 (2000)

    2000

  49. [57]

    Vorwerk, C

    C. Vorwerk, C. Cocchi, and C. Draxl, Addressing electron- hole correlation in core excitations of solids: An all-electron many-body approach from first principles, Physical Review B95, 155121 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Vorwerk, B

    C. Vorwerk, B. Aurich, C. Cocchi, and C. Draxl, Bethe–Salpeter equation for absorption and scattering spec- troscopy: implementation in the exciting code, Electronic Structure1, 037001 (2019). 12 First-principles approach to ultrafast pump-probe spectroscopy in solids Supporti...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.