Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Elimination of substrate-induced FMR linewidth broadening in the epitaxial system YIG-GGG by microstructuring

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read By patterning the YIG film into a small square or stripe, the paper removes the GGG substrate's inhomogeneous stray field from FMR linewidth measurements, and reports a non-Gilbert linewidth peak near 18 GHz below 10 K.

desk verdict A clean demonstration that microstructuring YIG into the homogeneous GGG stray-field region removes asymmetric FMR broadening, plus an intriguing but unproven non-Gilbert linewidth claim that needs an independent extraction check. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02978 v1 pith:BYKEDQBG submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mes-hall

David Schmoll , Rostyslav O. Serha , Jaganandha Panda , Andrey A. Voronov , Carsten Dubs , Michal Urbánek , Andrii V. Chumak This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords YIG-GGGferromagneticresonanceFMRlinewidthGGGstrayfieldmicrostructuringGilbertdampingcryogenicmagnonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports temperature-dependent ferromagnetic resonance measurements from 293 K down to 2 K, up to 40 GHz, on 150 nm yttrium iron garnet (YIG) films on gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) substrates, comparing a plain film with microstructured stripes and a square. The authors show that the asymmetric FMR linewidth broadening seen at cryogenic temperatures originates from the inhomogeneous stray field of the partially magnetized GGG substrate at the film edges, and that patterning the YIG so the probed region sits only in the homogeneous part of the stray field removes this broadening. Below 10 K, they find the linewidth no longer follows the usual Gilbert linear-in-frequency behavior: it rises nonlinearly to a maximum near 18 GHz and then decreases with frequency, even when the inhomogeneous stray field is absent. If correct, the result gives a simple design rule for low-loss YIG-GGG devices at millikelvin temperatures and points to an intrinsic, substrate-independent damping mechanism at cryogenic temperatures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing experimental device is the set of four sample geometries: the plain 4 x 4 mm film, a 0.5 x 4 mm stripe parallel to $B_0$, the same stripe orthogonal to $B_0$, and a 0.5 x 0.5 mm square. Because the GGG stray field is strongest and most nonuniform near the edges of the substrate, the first two geometries expose the YIG to the inhomogeneous field while the last two place the probed YIG only in the homogeneous central region; comparing the four isolates the stray-field contribution. The associated analysis machinery is the split-Lorentzian lineshape, which fits the left and right sides of the asymmetric FMR peak separately, together with a cubic spline background subtraction and an ellipticity correction converting the frequency linewidth into $\Delta B$. This combination is what lets the paper extract a linewidth from asymmetric spectra and then compare geometries.

What would settle it

Remove the GGG substrate from a microstructured YIG sample, or transfer the YIG onto a nonmagnetic substrate, and repeat the 2 to 10 K FMR sweep up to 40 GHz; if the linewidth no longer peaks near 18 GHz and then decreases with frequency, the claimed non-Gilbert behavior depends on the substrate after all or is an artifact of the split-Lorentzian fit rather than an intrinsic YIG property.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the cryogenic FMR linewidth broadening in YIG-GGG is dominated by the spatially inhomogeneous magnetic stray field of the GGG substrate, and that this parasitic contribution can be eliminated by microstructuring the YIG film into a 0.5 mm square or a 0.5 x 4 mm stripe oriented so the measured YIG sits only in the homogeneous central region of the substrate field. In the plane film and in the stripe parallel to the bias field, the FMR peak broadens asymmetrically toward lower frequencies at 2 K; in the orthogonal stripe and the square, the peak is symmetric. Fitting the spectra with a split-Lorentzian model, the authors extract the magnetic linewidth $\Delta B$ versus the FMR frequency $f_{\mathrm{FMR}}$ for all geometries and find that below 10 K the linewidth increases nonlinearly with frequency up to about 18 GHz and then decreases, a non-Gilbert trend that persists when the inhomogeneous stray field is removed and therefore is not caused by the stray field inhomogeneity.

Load-bearing premise

The split-Lorentzian fitting model faithfully extracts the physical FMR linewidth from the asymmetric absorption spectra, so the non-monotonic frequency dependence below 10 K is real damping behavior rather than an artifact of the fit; the paper does not validate the model against an independent measurement or provide uncertainty estimates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • YIG-GGG devices intended for millikelvin operation should pattern the YIG into islands smaller than the homogeneous region of the GGG stray field, avoiding the edge-dominated broadening without changing the magnetic material.
  • Reported cryogenic linewidths from unpatterned YIG-GGG samples include a substrate-geometry-dependent contribution, so future measurements should specify the lateral position and orientation of the film relative to the substrate edges.
  • The persistent non-monotonic linewidth below 10 K, with a maximum near 18 GHz, implies that the Gilbert model is incomplete for YIG-GGG at low temperatures and high fields; a quantitative damping parameter must account for this frequency dependence.
  • The reference-subtraction and split-Lorentzian extraction procedure can be applied to other thin-film magnetic systems on paramagnetic substrates to separate substrate artifacts from intrinsic damping.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to the propagating-spin-wave regime: the same edge-dominated stray field that broadens FMR should suppress spin-wave transmission at millikelvin temperatures, and microstructuring may offer a path to low-loss magnon conduits.
  • The occurrence of the linewidth maximum near 18 GHz suggests a resonant or crossover mechanism tied to the GGG magnetization rather than a simple relaxation; a test would vary the GGG composition, thickness, or field orientation and track whether the peak frequency shifts.
  • Because the split-Lorentzian model is the sole extractor of the reported linewidths, an independent cross-check, such as a different fitting form or a direct time-domain damping measurement, would be needed to confirm that the decrease above 18 GHz is physical and not a fitting artifact.
  • If the non-Gilbert behavior survives such a check, cryogenic YIG damping would not be capturable by a single Gilbert alpha, which would matter for the design of magnon-based quantum memories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports temperature-dependent ferromagnetic resonance measurements on 150 nm-thick YIG films grown on GGG, comparing four geometries: a 4x4 mm plane film, a 4x0.5 mm stripe parallel to the bias field, the same stripe orthogonal to the bias field, and a 0.5x0.5 mm square. The central claim is that microstructuring the YIG film so that the probed region lies in the homogeneous part of the GGG substrate stray field eliminates the asymmetric FMR linewidth broadening observed at cryogenic temperatures. A second, broader claim is that below 10 K the extracted linewidth Delta-B shows non-Gilbert behavior: it increases nonlinearly to a maximum near 18 GHz and then decreases with increasing frequency, independent of the inhomogeneous GGG stray field. The authors support the first claim with spectra at 293 K and 2 K together with FEMME simulations of the GGG stray field, and support the second claim with Delta-B versus frequency curves extracted using a split-Lorentzian fitting model introduced in Section II.

Significance. If the geometry result holds, the paper provides a practical and simple route to suppress substrate-induced FMR broadening in YIG-GGG, which is directly relevant to cryogenic magnonic and hybrid quantum devices. The same-wafer control, the four-configuration comparison, and the FEMME simulation support are genuine strengths, and the reported elimination of asymmetric broadening is visually clear and internally consistent. The broader non-Gilbert claim below 10 K, however, rests entirely on linewidth values extracted with an unvalidated fitting model and on model-dependent conversion corrections, with no uncertainty estimates. Because this claim is presented in the abstract and conclusion as a main result, the paper's overall significance is contingent on whether the linewidth extraction and conversion survive scrutiny. The paper is honest in stating that the physical mechanisms are not yet clear, but that admission does not replace the need for quantitative error analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 2] The non-Gilbert claim below 10 K — a nonlinear increase in ΔB to a maximum near 18 GHz and then a decrease with frequency — rests entirely on ΔB values obtained from the split-Lorentzian fit. No confidence intervals, fit residuals, or repeatability estimates are reported for any extracted linewidth. Because the 2–10 K regime is also where the GGG background is strongest, the reader cannot distinguish a physical linewidth drop from an extraction artifact. Please provide uncertainty estimates for every ΔB point and validate the split-Lorentzian extraction against at least one independent analysis, for example a direct fit to the raw absorption with a different lineshape or a comparison with a standard Lorentzian fit in the symmetric geometries.
  2. [Section II, Methodology] The conversion from the measured frequency linewidth Δf to the magnetic linewidth ΔB depends on the temperature-dependent saturation magnetization of YIG and on the antiparallel GGG stray-field correction, both supplied as model inputs without stated uncertainties. These corrections are largest at low temperature and high field, precisely the regime in which the claimed decrease of ΔB above 18 GHz appears. Please provide a sensitivity analysis showing how uncertainties in M_s(T) and in the GGG stray-field magnitude propagate into ΔB(f); if the non-monotonic behavior survives all plausible variations, the claim would be substantially strengthened.
  3. [Section III, Figs. 2(a)–(d)] The linewidth data contain unquantified oscillations that the paper attributes to thickness inhomogeneities and strain effects, but no supporting evidence is provided for that attribution. The 'steady decrease' above 18 GHz is claimed against this oscillating background, so an apparent drop could partly be scatter. Please quantify the scatter, for example through standard deviations of repeated measurements or a smoothness metric, and show that the decrease after the maximum exceeds this scatter at each temperature.
  4. [Abstract and Section IV] The statement that the non-Gilbert behavior is 'independent of the inhomogeneous GGG stray field' is strictly supported by the geometry comparison, but the stronger conclusion in Section IV that 'the physical reason behind the non-linear nature is not related to the substrate-induced magnetic field' goes beyond the data. The microstructured samples remain on the full GGG substrate and still experience the homogeneous part of the stray field and other substrate-induced damping contributions. Please rephrase the conclusion to the supported statement or provide an additional control, such as YIG transferred to a nonmagnetic substrate, to separate homogeneous GGG effects from intrinsic YIG behavior.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II, first paragraph] The text contains typographical spacing issues, for example 'B0 up to 1 .3 T' and 'V oronov' in the author list; please correct these throughout.
  2. [Figure 1 caption] The colored boxes in panels (e)–(f) and the curve colors in panels (g)–(j) are described in the text but not identified in the caption; please add a legend or explicit color key.
  3. [Figure 3] The frequency intervals 5–10, 10–15, 15–20, and 30–35 GHz are mentioned in the text but not indicated in the figure; consider adding vertical guides or a table with band edges to improve readability.
  4. [Reference [19]] Reference [19] lists 'P.C.S.' as an author, which appears to be an incomplete or incorrect set of initials; please check and correct the citation.
  5. [Introduction, first paragraph] The sentence beginning 'Continuous advances in nanofabrication technology... focused attention' has a subject–verb agreement problem; please revise for clarity.
  6. [Figure 1(g)–(j) caption] The list of observed FMR frequencies is useful but would be more informative with measurement uncertainties, especially because the central claim involves differences in linewidth rather than in resonance position.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central claims are empirical geometry comparisons, and its self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The experimental claims do not reduce to their own inputs. The central demonstration—that microstructuring the YIG film to a 0.5 x 0.5 mm square or a 0.5 x 4 mm stripe keeps the measured region in the homogeneous part of the GGG stray field and removes the asymmetric FMR broadening—is supported by direct comparison of absorption spectra in four measurement configurations (Fig. 1) and by FEMME simulations of the substrate stray field; neither comparison is constructed from the linewidth values being reported. The non-Gilbert behavior below 10 K is an interpretation of extracted ΔB(f) values, and while those values depend on the split-Lorentzian fitting model [30] and on the Δf-to-ΔB conversion with temperature-dependent YIG magnetization and GGG stray-field corrections, the model does not by construction impose the observed non-monotonic frequency dependence; independent fits of the same spectra could refute or confirm it. The paper cites prior work by the same group ([28], [30]) for the GGG stray-field characterization, the split-Lorentzian line shape, and the previously reported linewidth oscillations, but these citations supply independent experimental data (VSM magnetization, earlier FMR measurements) rather than a uniqueness theorem or a definition that makes the present conclusion true by construction. The paper also explicitly flags the missing mechanism ('physical mechanisms of the experimentally observed linewidth behavior are not yet clear' and 'requires further theoretical considerations'), which is a limitation, not a circular justification. Therefore no circular step is identified; the main risk is model dependence and soundness of the linewidth extraction, which is a correctness concern rather than circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the split-Lorentzian lineshape model, the Gilbert baseline, and the FEMME simulation of the GGG stray field. No new physical entities are introduced. The linewidth values themselves are measurement outputs, not fitted physical constants.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ferromagnetic resonance linewidth is expected to increase linearly with frequency according to the Gilbert model at all temperatures; deviations from this linearity are interpreted as non-Gilbert behavior.
    Section III compares the observed linewidth to 'the expected Gilbert-like linear increase of the linewidth with frequency' and uses this baseline to label the cryogenic behavior as non-Gilbert.
  • domain assumption The GGG substrate produces a temperature- and field-dependent stray field whose spatial inhomogeneity near the sample edges is the sole cause of the observed asymmetric FMR broadening.
    Section III and Fig. 1(e)-(f) attribute the asymmetric broadening to the simulated GGG stray field inhomogeneity, relying on the FEMME Maxwell solver and the measured GGG magnetization from Ref. 28.
  • ad hoc to paper A split-Lorentzian line shape with a one-dimensional cubic spline background adequately represents the FMR absorption spectra, allowing a meaningful linewidth to be extracted even from asymmetric peaks.
    Section II states that the resonance shape was fitted with a split-Lorentzian model and that this model was used to obtain all linewidth values presented in the paper.
  • domain assumption The FMR signal measured from the whole film is a superposition of local resonances weighted by the local stray field, so placing the sample in the homogeneous stray-field region removes the asymmetric component.
    Section III interprets the difference between plane-film and microstructured-sample spectra as caused by the sample's exposure to homogeneous versus inhomogeneous regions of the GGG stray field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Elimination of substrate-induced FMR linewidth broadening in the epitaxial system YIG-GGG by microstructuring." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BYKEDQBG

@misc{pith2026250202978,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Elimination of substrate-induced FMR linewidth broadening in the epitaxial system YIG-GGG by microstructuring},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BYKEDQBG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02978}
}
read the original abstract

Modern quantum technologies and hybrid quantum systems offer the opportunity to utilize magnons on the level of single excitations. Long lifetimes, low decoherence rates, and a strong coupling rate to other subsystems propose the ferrimagnet yttrium iron garnet (YIG), grown on a gadolinium gallium garnet (GGG) substrate, as a suitable platform to host magnonic quantum states. However, the magnetic damping at cryogenic temperatures significantly increases due to the paramagnetic character and the highly inhomogeneous stray field of GGG, as recent experiments and simulations pointed out. Here, we report on temperature dependent ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectroscopy studies in YIG-GGG thin-films with different sample geometries. We experimentally demonstrate how to eliminate the asymmetric stray field-induced linewidth broadening via microstructuring of the YIG film. Additionally, our experiments reveal evidence of a non-Gilbert like behavior of the linewidth at cryogenic temperatures, independent of the inhomogeneous GGG stray field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02978 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a)-(d) Different experimental configurations of the temperature dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Linewidth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Averaged linewidth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coherent coupling between YBCO superconducting resonators and sub-micrometer-thick YIG films

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A 104-nm-thick YIG film coherently couples to a YBCO superconducting resonator with collective coupling g/2π ≈ 230 MHz, and the temperature dependence is reproduced by a two-fluid model based on YBCO's penetration depth.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. V . Chumak et al., Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave computing, IEEE Trans. Magn. 58, 0800172 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Finocchio et al

    G. Finocchio et al. , Roadmap for unconventional computing with nanotechnology, Nano Futures 8, 012001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Barman et al., The 2021 magnonics roadmap, J

    A. Barman et al., The 2021 magnonics roadmap, J. Phys.: Condens.Matter 33, 413001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Pirro, V

    P. Pirro, V . I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Advances in coherent magnonics, Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1114 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Mahmoud, F

    A. Mahmoud, F. Ciubotaru, F. Vanderveken, A. V . Chumak, S. Hamdioui, C. Adelmann, and S. Cotofana, Introduction to spin wave computing, J. Appl. Phys. 128, 161101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Zenbaa, C

    N. Zenbaa, C. Abert, F. Majcen, M. Kerber, R. O. Serha, S. Knauer, Q. Wang, T. Schrefl, D. Suess, and A. V . Chumak, Experimental realisation of a universal inverse-design magnonic device, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2403.17724

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Realization of inverse-design magnonic logic gates

    N. Zenbaa, F. Majcen, C. Abert, F. Bruckner, N. Mauser, T. Schrefl, , Q. Wang, D. Suess, and A. V . Chumak, Realization of inverse-design magnonic logic gates, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2411.17546

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Q. Wang, R. Verba, B. Heinz, M. Schneider, O. Wojewoda, K. Davídková, K. Levchenko, C. Dubs, N. J. Mauser, M. Urbánek, P. Pirro, and A. V . Chumak, Deeply nonlinear excitation of self-normalized short spin waves, Sci. Adv 9, eadg4609 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Heinz, T

    B. Heinz, T. Brächer, M. Schneider, Q. Wang, B. Lägel, A. M. Friedel, D. Breitbach, S. Steinert, T. Meyer, M. Kewenig, C. Dubs, P. Pirro, and A. V . Chumak, Propagation of spin-wave packets in individual nanosized yttrium iron garnet magnonic conduits, Nano Lett. 20, 4220 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Levchenko, K. O., K. Davidkova, J. Mikkelsen, and A. V . Chumak, Review on spin-wave rf applications, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2411.19212

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Q. Wang, R. Verba, K. Davídková, B. Heinz, S. Tian, Y . Rao, M. Guo, X. Guo, C. Dubs, P. Pirro, and A. V . Chumak, All-magnonic repeater based on bistability, Nat. Commun.15, 7577 (2024). 8

    2024

  4. [12]

    Heussner, G

    F. Heussner, G. Talmelli, M. Geilen, B. Heinz, T. Brächer, T. Meyer, F. Ciubotaru, C. Adelmann, K. Yamamoto, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, and P. Pirro, Experimental realization of a passive gigahertz frequency-division demultiplexer for magnonic logic networks, Phys. Status So...

    2020

  5. [13]

    V ogt, F

    K. V ogt, F. Y . Fradin, J. E. Pearson, T. Sebastian, S. D. Bader, B. Hillebrands, A. Hoffmann, and H. Schultheiss, Realization of a spin-wave multiplexer, Nat. Commun. 5, 3727 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    Zhang, A review of common materials for hybrid quantum magnonics, Materials Today Electronics 5, 100044 (2023)

    X. Zhang, A review of common materials for hybrid quantum magnonics, Materials Today Electronics 5, 100044 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Jiang, J

    Z. Jiang, J. Lim, Y . Li, W. Pfaff, T. H. Lo, J. Qian, A. Schleife, J. M. Zuo, V . Novosad, and A. Hoffmann, Integrating magnons for quantum information, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 130501 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Y . Li, W. Zhang, V . Tyberkevych, W. K. Kwok, A. Hoffmann, and V . Novosad, Hybrid magnonics: Physics, circuits, and applications for coherent information processing, J. Appl. Phys.128, 130902 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics, Appl. Phys. Express 12, 070101 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    A. A. Serga, A. V . Chumak, and B. Hillebrands, Yig magnonics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 264002 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    LeCraw, E

    R. LeCraw, E. Spencer, and P. C.S., Ferromagnetic resonance line width in yttrium iron garnet single crystals, Phys. Rev. 10, 1311 (1958)

    1958

  12. [20]

    Cherepanov, I

    V . Cherepanov, I. Kolokolov, and V . L’vov, The saga of yig: Spectra, thermodynamics, interaction and relaxation of magnons in a complex magnet, Physics Reports 229, 81 (1993)

    1993

  13. [21]

    Adam, Analog signal processing with microwave magnetics, Proc

    J. Adam, Analog signal processing with microwave magnetics, Proc. IEEE 76, 159 (1988)

    1988

  14. [22]

    Glass, Ferrite films for microwave and millimeter-wave devices, Proc

    H. Glass, Ferrite films for microwave and millimeter-wave devices, Proc. IEEE 76, 151 (1988)

    1988

  15. [23]

    Ishak, Magnetostatic wave technology: a review, Proc

    W. Ishak, Magnetostatic wave technology: a review, Proc. IEEE 76, 171 (1988)

    1988

  16. [24]

    Morgenthaler, An overview of electromagnetic and spin angular momentum mechanical waves in ferrite media, Proc

    F. Morgenthaler, An overview of electromagnetic and spin angular momentum mechanical waves in ferrite media, Proc. IEEE 76, 138 (1988)

    1988

  17. [25]

    Rodrigue, A generation of microwave ferrite devices, Proc

    G. Rodrigue, A generation of microwave ferrite devices, Proc. IEEE 76, 121 (1988)

    1988

  18. [26]

    Y . Cao, P. Yan, H. Huebl, S. T. Goennenwein, and G. E. Bauer, Exchange magnon-polaritons in microwave cavities, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.91, 094423 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Linke, A. Danilewsky, U. Brückner, and D. Jan, Sub-micrometer yttrium iron garnet lpe films with low ferromagnetic resonance losses, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 204005 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    R. O. Serha, A. A. V oronov, D. Schmoll, R. Verba, K. O. Levchenko, S. Koraltan, K. Davídková, B. Budinská, Q. Wang, O. V . Dobrovolskiy, M. Urbánek, M. Lindner, T. Reimann, C. Dubs, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, C. Abert, D. Suess, D. A. Bozhko, S. Knauer, and A. V . Chumak, Magnet...

    2024

  21. [29]

    Kosen, A

    S. Kosen, A. F. V . Loo, D. A. Bozhko, L. Mihalceanu, and A. D. Karenowska, Microwave magnon damping in yig films at millikelvin temperatures, APL Mater. 7, 101120 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    R. O. Serha, A. A. V oronov, D. Schmoll, R. Klingbeil, S. Knauer, S. Koraltan, E. Pribytova, M. Lindner, T. Reimann, C. Dubs, C. Abert, R. Verba, M. Urbánek, D. Suess, and A. V . Chumak, Damping enhancement in yig at millikelvin temperatures due to ggg substrate, arXiv (2024),...

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Schmoll, A

    D. Schmoll, A. A. V oronov, R. O. Serha, D. Slobodianiuk, K. O. Levchenko, C. Abert, S. Knauer, D. Suess, R. Verba, and A. V . Chumak, Wavenumber-dependent magnetic losses in yig-ggg heterostructures at millikelvin temperatures, arXiv (2024), arXiv:2411.13414

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Knauer, K

    S. Knauer, K. Davídková, D. Schmoll, R. O. Serha, A. V oronov, Q. Wang, R. Verba, O. V . Dobrovolskiy, M. Lindner, T. Reimann, C. Dubs, M. Urbánek, and A. V . Chumak, Propagating spin-wave spectroscopy in a liquid-phase epitaxial nanometer-thick yig film at millikelvin tempera...

    2023

  25. [33]

    Herrera-Gomez, D

    A. Herrera-Gomez, D. M. Guzman-Bucio, A. J. Carmona-Carmona, O. Cortazar-Martinez, M. Mayorga-Garay, D. Cabrera-German, C. A. Ospina-Ocampo, B. V . Crist, and J. Raboño-Borbolla, Double lorentzian lineshape for asymmetric peaks in photoelectron spectroscopy, J. Vac. Sci. Techn...

    2023

  26. [34]

    S. S. Kalarickal, P. Krivosik, M. Wu, C. E. Patton, M. L. Schneider, P. Kabos, T. J. Silva, and J. P. Nibarger, Ferromagnetic resonance linewidth in metallic thin films: Comparison of measurement methods, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 093909 (2006). 10

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.