Pith. sign in

REVIEW 62 references

Critical Microwave Mach-Zehnder-Type Interferometry with Dual-LO Rydberg Atoms

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A dual-local-oscillator Rydberg-atom scheme realizes a Mach-Zehnder-type microwave interferometer with phase resolution below 0.1 degrees, full 360 degree coverage, and a claimed sensitivity gain of about 25 dB.

arxiv 2608.13222 v1 pith:BYZJ4TIN submitted 2026-08-13 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Jun-Rong Chen , Guo-Qing Qin , Peng-Fu Liang , He Hao , Ming-Min Zhao , Ling-Qiang Meng , Gui-Lan Li , Min-Jian Zhao
show 2 more authors
Bin-Bin Wei Hao Tian
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords microwavephasecircexceedinginterferometricmach-zehnder-typemetrologyresolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Atoms can be used as tiny sensors for microwave fields. The authors shine a probe laser and a coupling laser through a cesium vapor cell to prepare atoms in a high-energy Rydberg state. When microwave fields are present, the atoms change how much light passes through, and this change appears as an electric signal at a beat frequency. Standard Rydberg receivers use one reference microwave beam, or local oscillator, and the signal's phase is read from the timing of the beat waveform. Here, the authors use two local oscillators placed symmetrically around the signal frequency. Each oscillator creates its own beat with the signal, and these two beats are added inside the atoms. The combined beat's strength depends directly on the signal's phase, like two light beams interfering in an interferometer. When the two paths cancel, the output nearly vanishes. Operating near that dark point makes the output very sensitive: a tiny phase change causes a large change in the measured power, when power is viewed on a decibel scale.

The authors add a weak auxiliary field at the signal frequency to hold the system at this dark point, and then show that a weak test signal changes the output enough to be detected. They report a detection sensitivity of about minus 152 dBm per hertz, about 25 dB better than their comparison receiver. They also use the same phase-to-intensity mapping to measure the distance a microwave travels (about 20 micron precision) and the angle of its polarization (below 0.1 degrees). The main caveat is that the 25 dB sensitivity gain relies on a metric that mixes a phase with a decibel power, and the comparison receiver is evaluated with a different observable, so the gain is not yet independently established.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The load-bearing claim is that the dual-LO Rydberg configuration realizes a Mach-Zehnder-type interferometer whose IF intensity is governed by I_Itf = 10 log[1 + cos(phi_LO1 + phi_LO2 - 2 phi_sig)] (Eqs. 3 and 7), enabling direct phase retrieval with resolution exceeding 0.1 degrees over the full 360 degree range and, when biased by an auxiliary field at the critical point, a power-sensitivity enhancement exceeding 25 dB relative to a conventional single-LO receiver. If true, this gives a simple, reconfigurable Rydberg platform for phase, distance, and polarization metrology.

Load-bearing premise

The entire interferometric transfer characteristic rests on the assumption that the two IF components from LO1 and LO2 are generated with exactly equal amplitudes in the atomic medium and recombine as coherent classical fields, so that their sum can reach a perfect null (Eqs. 1-3 and 7). Any imbalance, saturation, or uncontrolled higher-order mixing product would leave a residual background at the critical point and would remove the diverging slope on which the 25 dB sensitivity claim depends.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is small: the interference formula is elementary, but it rests on the assumption of equal, coherent IF paths that can reach a perfect null. The phase-resolution limit and the sensitivity enhancement both depend on hand-chosen thresholds (delta_I_IF = 1) and on an unstated noise floor, which are the main free parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Minimum detectable intensity variation delta_I_IF = 1 (normalized)
    In Methods Eq. 10, the phase-resolution limit is computed by setting delta_I_IF = 1; this hand-chosen threshold of 1 dB is not derived from noise statistics and directly determines the quoted sub-0.1 degree resolution.
  • Detection threshold for conventional receiver = not specified
    The 25 dB sensitivity gain in Fig. 4 compares the conventional receiver's IF power against the interferometer's oscillation factor, but the threshold at which a signal is considered detected is never stated, so the comparison lacks a common basis.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The two IF components IF1 and IF2 are generated with equal amplitudes and recombine coherently in the atomic medium as classical fields (Eqs. 1-3).
    The entire interference model depends on this; no derivation from the atomic Hamiltonian is given.
  • domain assumption The detected IF intensity is the squared modulus of the summed IF fields and can be represented in dB as 10 log[1 + cos(phi_Itf)] (Eq. 7).
    Assumes the photodetection and spectrum analyzer respond linearly to the IF power and that higher-order mixing products are negligible at the IF frequency.
  • domain assumption The auxiliary field exactly biases the interferometer to the critical destructive-interference point and is coherent with the signal (Methods, Eqs. 11-13).
    Requires a controlled phase relation between Aux and signal; any phase noise or frequency offset degrades the claimed sensitivity enhancement.
  • domain assumption The Rydberg transition responds linearly to the microwave field amplitude so the polarization response enters only as cos(theta_sig) (Methods, Eq. 16).
    Ignores possible tensor polarizability and saturation effects for the 50D to 51P transition.
  • standard math Standard trigonometric identities and small-angle expansions are used to derive the interference and phase-perturbation formulas.
    No issue; included for completeness.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Critical Microwave Mach-Zehnder-Type Interferometry with Dual-LO Rydberg Atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BYZJ4TIN

@misc{pith2026260813222,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Critical Microwave Mach-Zehnder-Type Interferometry with Dual-LO Rydberg Atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BYZJ4TIN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13222}
}
abstract

High-precision phase measurement of microwave fields underpins a wide range of applications, including wireless communications, distributed radar, plasma diagnostics, and antenna metrology. Existing Rydberg-atom-based approaches, however, often face trade-offs among phase resolution, measurement range, and system complexity. Here we demonstrate a Rydberg-atom-based microwave Mach-Zehnder-type interferometer using a dual-local-oscillator configuration. The two local oscillators establish two coherent interferometric pathways in the Rydberg medium. Their coherent mixing with the signal field produces an interferometric intermediate-frequency output governed by a phase-to-intensity transfer characteristic that enables critical-point enhancement. This scheme supports direct phase retrieval with a resolution exceeding $0.1^\circ$ and unambiguous full $360^\circ$ phase coverage with the reconfigurable dual-LO architecture. Moreover, near the critical interference point, the system exhibits a sharply enhanced phase-to-amplitude transduction, where weak amplitude variations are converted into pronounced phase responses, yielding a sensitivity enhancement exceeding 25 dB. Besides, the same interferometric transfer mechanism enables microwave propagation-distance and polarization metrology, achieving a propagation-distance precision below 20 $\mu$m at 5.7 GHz together with a polarization-angle resolution exceeding $0.1^\circ$. This approach eliminates the need for complex optical configurations and lock-in detection, providing a simple, scalable, and reconfigurable Mach-Zehnder-type quantum microwave interferometry framework for multifunctional high-precision microwave metrology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13222 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Dual-LO Mach-Zehnder-type microwave interferometry. (a) Energy-level diagram of Cs atoms. A probe beam and a coupling beam drive a two-photon EIT process, exciting Cs atoms from the ground state 6S1/2 to the Rydberg state 50D5/2. Two local oscillator fields (LO1 and LO2) are symmetrically detuned about the signal field frequency and are both near-resonant with the Rydberg transition 50D5/2 → 51P3/2. (b) Schematic of… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Response characteristics of the dual-LO Mach-Zehnder-type microwave interferometer. (a) Output IF spectra obtained using the conventional single-LO superheterodyne scheme (upper panel) and the proposed dual-LO interfer￾ometric scheme (lower panel). (b) Output IF signals under the single-LO standard superheterodyne scheme for varying signal field phase shifts. The upper, middle, and lower panels correspond to phase s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. High-precision phase retrieval using the dual-LO Mach-Zehnder-type microwave interferometer.. (a) Interferometric response as a function of signal-field phase over the range from −90◦ to +90◦ . The phases of LO1 and LO2 are fixed at 0◦ and 180◦ , respectively. As the signal phase approaches the critical interference point, the response slope increases significantly. According to the local transfer slope, the respons… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Critical-point-enhanced sensitivity in the Mach-Zehnder-type interferometer. (a) Output IF spectra measured with LO1, LO2, and the auxiliary field (Aux) present simultaneously, in the absence (upper panel) and presence (lower panel) of the external signal field. The ph…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Interferometric microwave distance and polarization metrology. (a) Experimental configuration for in￾terferometric microwave metrology. LO1 and LO2 are combined by a resistive power divider (RPD) and transmitted toward the atomic vapor cell through Horn1. The signal fi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. Gong, P. Gavriilidis, R. Ji, C. Huang, G. C. Alexan- dropoulos, L. Wei, Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, H. V. Poor, and C. Yuen, Holographic mimo communications: Theo- retical foundations, enabling technologies, and future di- rections, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials26, 196 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Zhao, Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6g: ap- plications, challenges, and solutions, Frontiers of Infor- mation Technology & Electronic Engineering24, 1669 (2023)

    Y. Zhao, Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6g: ap- plications, challenges, and solutions, Frontiers of Infor- mation Technology & Electronic Engineering24, 1669 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Ren and R

    J. Ren and R. G. Vaughan, Absolute phase in mobile channels, Wireless Communications and Mobile Comput- ing11, 843 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Janoudi, P

    V. Janoudi, P. Schoeder, T. Grebner, N. Appenrodt, J. Dickmann, and C. Waldschmidt, On distributed radar networks: Signal model, analysis, and signal processing, IEEE Journal of Microwaves4, 329 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    C. Lin, C. Huang, and Y. Su, A coherent signal processing method for distributed radar system, in2016 Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium (PIERS)(IEEE,

    work page

  6. [6]

    K¨ ohn-Seemann and R

    A. K¨ ohn-Seemann and R. B. Morales, From electron cy- clotron emission and reflectometry to microwave imaging diagnostics in fusion plasmas: Progress and perspectives, 12 Physics of Plasmas32(2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Cunningham, Use of the absolute phase in frequency modulated continuous wave plasma reflectometry, Re- view of Scientific Instruments79(2008)

    G. Cunningham, Use of the absolute phase in frequency modulated continuous wave plasma reflectometry, Re- view of Scientific Instruments79(2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Cutler, A

    C. Cutler, A. King, and W. Kock, Microwave antenna measurements, Proceedings of the IRE35, 1462 (1947)

    work page 1947

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Kim, H.-J

    S. Kim, H.-J. Dong, J.-W. Yu, and H. L. Lee, Phased ar- ray calibration system with high accuracy and low com- plexity, Alexandria Engineering Journal69, 759 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Sebastian, P

    J. Sebastian, P. Dayal, K.-B. Song, and W. AliAh- mad, Explicit calibration of mmwave phased arrays with phase dependent errors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.09561 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Jokinen, O

    M. Jokinen, O. Kursu, N. Tervo, A. P¨ arssinen, and M. E. Leinonen, Over-the-air phase calibration methods for 5g mmw antenna array transceivers, IEEE Access12, 28057 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    D. A. Abd El-Aziz, A. M. Attiya, H. M. Elhennawy, and R. S. Ali, Comparative study of microwave relative phase measurement methods, MAPAN40, 253 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Balestrieri, L

    E. Balestrieri, L. De Vito, F. Picariello, S. Rapuano, I. Tudosa,et al., A review of accurate phase measure- ment methods and instruments for sinewave signals, Acta Imeko9, 52 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Schlossberger, N

    N. Schlossberger, N. Prajapati, S. Berweger, A. P. Ro- tunno, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, M. T. Simons, A. A. Sheikh, E. B. Norrgard, S. P. Eckel, and C. L. Holloway, Rydberg states of alkali atoms in atomic vapour as si- traceable field probes and communications receivers, Na- tur...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Allinson, M

    G. Allinson, M. Bason, A. Bonnin, S. Bor´ owka, P. Martin-Iglesias, M. M. Neira, M. Mazelanik, R. Murchie, M. Parniak, S. Pataraia,et al., Ryd- berg receivers for space applications, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20631 (2026)

    2026

  8. [16]

    J. Yuan, W. Yang, M. Jing, H. Zhang, Y. Jiao, W. Li, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Quantum sensing of mi- crowave electric fields based on Rydberg atoms, Reports on Progress in Physics86, 106001 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    B. Liu, L. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Deng, D. Ding, B. Shi, and G. Guo, Electric field measurement and application based on Rydberg atoms, Electromagnetic Science1, 1 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    C. L. Holloway, M. T. Simons, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, and J. A. Gordon, Overview of Rydberg atom-based sensors/receivers for the measurement of electric fields, power, voltage, and modulated signals, Antenna and Ar- ray Technologies for Future Wireless Ecosystems , 393 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    D. H. Meyer, Z. A. Castillo, K. C. Cox, and P. D. Kunz, Assessment of Rydberg atoms for wideband electric field sensing, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics53, 034001 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    M. T. Simons, A. H. Haddab, J. A. Gordon, and C. L. Holloway, A Rydberg atom-based mixer: Measuring the phase of a radio frequency wave, Applied Physics Letters 114(2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    M. Jing, Y. Hu, J. Ma, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy, Nature Physics16, 911 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    M. Cai, Z. Xu, S. You, and H. Liu, Sensitivity im- provement and determination of Rydberg atom-based microwave sensor, inPhotonics, Vol. 9 (MDPI, 2022) p. 250

    2022

  15. [23]

    Ding, Z.-K

    D.-S. Ding, Z.-K. Liu, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, K. Mølmer, and C. S. Adams, Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body Rydberg atomic system, Nature Physics18, 1447 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Liu, J.-R

    B. Liu, J.-R. Chen, Y. Ma, Q.-F. Wang, T.-Y. Han, H. Tian, Y.-H. Qian, G.-C. Guo, L.-H. Zhang, B.- B. Wei,et al., Enhanced multi-parameter metrology in dissipative Rydberg atom time crystals, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10347 (2026)

    2026

  17. [25]

    D. Xiao, Z. Shi, L. Chen, S. Yan, L. Xu, and H. Zhang, Low-frequency weak electric field measurement based on Rydberg atoms using cavity-enhanced three photon sys- tem, Frontiers in Physics12, 1405149 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Liang, Q

    Y. Liang, Q. Wang, Z. Wang, S. Guan, P. Yang, Y. Zhang, J. He, P. Zhang, G. Li, and T. Zhang, Cavity- enhanced Rydberg atomic superheterodyne receiver, Op- tics Express33, 13034 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Liu, L.-H

    B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Q.-F. Wang, Y. Ma, T.-Y. Han, Z.- K. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhang, S.-Y. Shao, J. Zhang, Q. Li,et al., Cavity-enhanced Rydberg atom microwave receiver, Chi- nese Physics Letters42, 053201 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    V. Venu, S. M. Bohaichuk, F. Christaller, M. Schmidt, H. K¨ ubler, and J. P. Shaffer, Three-photon Rydberg atom electrometry with enhanced sensitivity, inQuan- tum Sensing, Imaging, and Precision Metrology III, Vol. 13392 (SPIE, 2025) pp. 255–260

    2025

  21. [29]

    Schlossberger, N

    N. Schlossberger, N. Prajapati, A. B. Artusio- Glimpse, S. Berweger, and C. L. Holloway, Fundamen- tal linewidth limit of electromagnetically induced trans- parency in a thermal Rydberg ladder, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04596 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Prajapati, N

    N. Prajapati, N. Bhusal, A. P. Rotunno, S. Berweger, M. T. Simons, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, Y. Ju Wang, E. Bottomley, H. Fan, and C. L. Holloway, Sensitivity comparison of two-photon vs three-photon Rydberg elec- trometry, Journal of Applied Physics134(2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Santamaria-Botello, S

    G. Santamaria-Botello, S. Verploegh, E. Bottomley, and Z. Popovic, Comparison of noise temperature of Rydberg-atom and electronic microwave receivers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00908 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Qiu, H.-L

    S.-Y. Qiu, H.-L. Wang, X.-H. Liu, Z.-Q. Du, Y.-Q. Guo, H.-T. Tu, Y. Xu, T.-F. Miao, H. Yan, and K.-Y. Liao, Shortwave frequency-hopping reception via a Rydberg atom-based electrically small antenna, Applied Physics Letters128, 034003 (2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    Schlossberger, C

    N. Schlossberger, C. L. Holloway, E. McKee, M. A. Highman, and N. Prajapati, Electromagnetically induced transparency and population repump readout of Ryd- berg states of cs atoms in a J-scheme, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.08678 (2026)

    2026

  26. [34]

    Liu, K.-Y

    X.-H. Liu, K.-Y. Liao, Z.-X. Zhang, H.-T. Tu, W. Bian, Z.-Q. Li, S.-Y. Zheng, H.-H. Li, W. Huang, H. Yan,et al., Continuous-frequency microwave heterodyne detection in an atomic vapor cell, Physical Review Applied18, 054003 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Prajapati, S

    N. Prajapati, S. Berweger, A. P. Rotunno, A. B. Artusio- Glimpse, N. Schlossberger, D. Shylla, W. J. Watterson, M. T. Simons, D. LaMantia, E. B. Norrgard, S. P. Eckel, and C. L. Holloway, Investigation of fluorescence ver- sus transmission readout for three-photon Rydberg ex- ...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Zhang, Y

    J. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, Z. Xu, F. Jia, J. Wang, F. Meng, Q. Wang, J. Zhang, and Z. Zhong, Advanc- 13 ing Three-Photon-Excited Rydberg RF Sensing: Fluo- rescence Readout for Wide-Dynamic-Range Characteri- zation and Spatial Resolution Beyond Transmission, Sen- sors25, 7185 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    J. Yao, Z. Sun, Y. Lin, D. Sang, S. Zhang, K. Yang, J. Zhang, Q. An, and Y. Fu, Ultra-wideband continuous spectrum Rydberg atomic superheterodyne receiver with high sensitivity, Communications Physics (2026)

    2026

  30. [38]

    Zhang, Z

    L. Zhang, Z. Liu, B. Liu, Q. Wang, Y. Ma, T. Han, Z. Zhang, H. Chen, S. Shao, Q. Li,et al., Tun- able off-resonant Rydberg microwave frequency comb spectroscopy based on metawaveguide coupled Rydberg atoms, Chinese Optics Letters22, 080201 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    J. Hu, H. Li, R. Song, J. Bai, Y. Jiao, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Continuously tunable radio frequency electrometry with Rydberg atoms, Applied Physics Letters121(2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Liu, L.-H

    B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Z.-K. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhu, W. Gao, G.-C. Guo, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Highly sensitive measurement of a megahertz rf electric field with a Rydberg-atom sensor, Physical Review Applied 18, 014045 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Zhang, Z.-K

    L.-H. Zhang, Z.-K. Liu, B. Liu, Q.-F. Wang, Y. Ma, T.-Y. Han, Z.-Y. Zhang, H.-C. Chen, S.-Y. Shao, Q. Lim,et al., Floquet engineering Rydberg sub-THz frequency comb spectroscopy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07433 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. Yuan, M. Jing, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Isotropic antenna based on Rydberg atoms, Optics Express32, 8379 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    M. T. Simons, A. H. Haddab, J. A. Gordon, D. Novotny, and C. L. Holloway, Embedding a Rydberg atom-based sensor into an antenna for phase and amplitude detection of radio-frequency fields and modulated signals, IEEE access7, 164975 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    J. A. Gordon, M. T. Simons, A. H. Haddab, and C. L. Holloway, Weak electric-field detection with sub-1 hz res- olution at radio frequencies using a Rydberg atom-based mixer, Aip Advances9(2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    A. K. Robinson, N. Prajapati, D. Senic, M. T. Simons, J. A. Gordon, and C. L. Holloway, Angle-of-arrival of a radio-frequency field from sub-wavelength Rydberg atom-based phase measurements, inCLEO: Science and Innovations(Optica Publishing Group, 2021) pp. SW2I– 3

    2021

  38. [46]

    P. K. Elgee, K. C. Cox, J. C. Hill, P. D. Kunz, and D. H. Meyer, Electrically small Rydberg sensor for three- dimensional determination of radio-frequency k-vectors, Physical Review Applied23, 064022 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    M. Cui, Q. Zeng, and K. Huang, Rydberg atomic re- ceiver: Next frontier of wireless communications, IEEE Communications Magazine (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Y. Tong, Z. Liu, Q. Ren, H. Wang, W. Yang, J. Xie, M. Jing, H. Zhang, L. Xiao, S. Jia,et al., Broadband fre- quency hopping by Rydberg atoms with high orbital an- gular momentum states, Optics Express34, 5447 (2026)

    2026

  41. [49]

    Prajapati, A

    N. Prajapati, A. P. Rotunno, S. Berweger, M. T. Simons, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, S. D. Voran, and C. L. Holloway, TV and video game streaming with a quantum receiver: A study on a Rydberg atom-based receiver’s bandwidth and reception clarity, A VS Quantum Science4(2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    D. H. Meyer, J. C. Hill, P. D. Kunz, and K. C. Cox, Simultaneous multiband demodulation using a Rydberg atomic sensor, Physical Review Applied19, 014025 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Nan, J.-R

    J.-D. Nan, J.-R. Chen, B. Liu, Q.-F. Wang, Y. Ma, Y.-M. Yin, T.-Y. Han, G.-C. Guo, H. Tian, L.-H. Zhang,et al., Ultra-broadband anti-jamming communication via a Ry- dberg atomic receiver, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.14497 (2026)

    2026

  44. [52]

    S. M. Bohaichuk, D. Booth, K. Nickerson, H. Tai, and J. P. Shaffer, Origins of Rydberg-atom electrometer tran- sient response and its impact on radio-frequency pulse sensing, Physical Review Applied18, 034030 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    M. Chen, T. Mao, Z. Zhu, H. Feng, G. Gao, Z. Wu, W. Xiao, Z. Li, and D. Zheng, High-resolution quan- tum sensing with Rydberg atomic receiver: Princi- ples, experiments and future prospects, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.11833 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Arumugam, J.-H

    D. Arumugam, J.-H. Park, B. Feyissa, J. Bush, and S. P. Mysore Nagaraja, Remote sensing of soil moisture using Rydberg atoms and satellite signals of opportunity, Sci- entific Reports14, 18025 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    W. J. Watterson, N. Prajapati, R. Castillo-Garza, S. Berweger, N. Schlossberger, A. Artusio-Glimpse, C. L. Holloway, and M. T. Simons, An imaging radar using a Rydberg atom receiver, Applied Physics Letters127 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    S. M. Bohaichuk, V. Venu, F. Christaller, and J. P. Shaffer, Transient phase sensing in a three-photon Ryd- berg ladder scheme, Physical Review Letters136, 153201 (2026)

    2026

  49. [57]

    Jia, H.-Y

    F.-D. Jia, H.-Y. Zhang, X.-B. Liu, J. Mei, Y.-H. Yu, Z.- Q. Lin, H.-Y. Dong, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, F. Xie,et al., Transfer phase of microwave to beat amplitude in a Ry- dberg atom-based mixer by zeeman modulation, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics54, 1655...

    2021

  50. [58]

    S. B. Oliver, S. Berweger, E. E. Mikhailov, D. Manchaiah, N. Prajapati, C. L. Holloway, and M. T. Simons, Simul- taneous detection, demodulation, and angle-of-arrival de- termination of communication signals using a dual lad- der Rydberg receiver, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.002...

    2026

  51. [59]

    Liu, F.-D

    X.-B. Liu, F.-D. Jia, H.-Y. Zhang, J. Mei, W.-C. Liang, F. Zhou, Y.-H. Yu, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, F. Xie,et al., An all- optical phase detector by amplitude modulation of the lo- cal field in a Rydberg atom-based mixer, Chinese Physics B31, 090703 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Anderson, R

    D. Anderson, R. Sapiro, L. Gon¸ calves, R. Cardman, and G. Raithel, Optical radio-frequency phase measure- ment with an internal-state Rydberg atom interferome- ter, Physical Review Applied17, 044020 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Y. Han, C. He, P. Xu, Y. Zhao, T. Wang, and W. Li, Phase-sensitive Rydberg-atom interferometry with flo- quet electromagnetically induced transparency, Physical Review Applied24, 024063 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Berweger, A

    S. Berweger, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, A. P. Rotunno, N. Prajapati, J. D. Christesen, K. R. Moore, M. T. Si- mons, and C. L. Holloway, Closed-loop quantum inter- ferometry for phase-resolved Rydberg-atom field sensing, Physical Review Applied20, 054009 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.