REVIEW 2 cited by
Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM?
read the original abstract
We review the evidence for substructures from the anomalous flux ratios in gravitational lenses. Using high-resolution numerical simulations, we show that at typical image positions, the fraction of surface mass density in substructures is <~ 0.5% with mass above 10^{-4} virial masses in the ``concordance'' LCDM cosmology. Substructures outside the virial radius (but projected at typical lens image positions) only increase the fraction moderately. Several effects, in particular baryonic settling and the requirement of compactness, may further decrease the predictions by a factor of few. The predicted fraction with appropriate properties thus appears to be lower than that required by lensing, although both are still uncertain. More speculative substructures such as massive black holes (M ~ 10^5-10^6 solar masses) in the halo may offer viable alternatives.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Subversive Role of Excessive External Shear in Concealing Lensing Anomalies
Excessive external shear in ellipsoidal lens models of quadruply-lensed quasar NLRs always resolves position anomalies and reduces flux-ratio anomalies, concealing signals commonly attributed to dark-matter substructure.
-
Taking Inventory of the Most Promising Lensed Radio Sources for Constraining Fundamental Properties of Dark Matter
Reports results from two searches for new radio lenses in existing surveys and discusses the completeness of the population usable for constraining dark matter properties via astrometric perturbations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.