REVIEW 1 cited by
Comment on "Multiscatter stellar capture of dark matter"
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Bramante, Delgado, and Martin [Phys. Rev. D96, 063002(2017)., hereafter BDM17] extended the analytical formalism of dark matter (DM) capture in a very important way, which allows, in principle, the use of compact astrophysical objects, such as neutron stars (NS), as dark matter detectors. In this comment, we point out the existence of a region in the dark matter neutron scattering cross section $(\sigma_{nX})$ vs. dark matter mass $(m_{X})$ where the constraining power of this method is lost. This corresponds to a maximal temperature ($T_{crit}$) the NS has to have, in order to serve as a dark matter detector. In addition, we point out several typos and errors in BDM17 that do not affect drastically their conclusions. Moreover, we provide semi-analytical approximations for the total capture rates of dark matter particle of arbitrary mass for various limiting regimes. Those analytical approximations are used to validate our numerical results.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can Orbital Decay of Accreting Binary Pulsars Probe Dark Matter?
Dark matter accretion onto binary pulsars is far too weak to affect observed orbital decay, so existing pulsar timing data cannot probe dark matter microphysics.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.