Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 85 references

JT gravity and deformed CFTs

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that certain SL(2,R)-deformed 2D CFTs on a strip give an alternative ultraviolet completion of JT gravity and of JT gravity coupled to finite-central-charge CFTs.

desk verdict A technically rich but quantitatively tuned proposal: strip modular quantization as a UV completion of JT gravity; the load-bearing entropy and density-of-states matches are identifications, not independent predictions, so the paper should be treated as a proposal, not a proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17889 v1 pith:C36UU63O submitted 2025-07-23 hep-th

Suchetan Das , Anirban Dinda This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 81T4083C5783C4581T35 PACS 04.60.Kz04.70.Dy11.25.Hf
keywords SL(2R)-deformedCFTJTgravitymodularquantizationstretchedhorizonAdS2blackholePagecurveholographic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that certain SL(2,R)-deformed two-dimensional CFTs on a strip give an alternative ultraviolet completion of pure Jackiw–Teitelboim (JT) gravity and of JT gravity coupled to a finite-central-charge CFT. In the prescribed classical limits, the deformed CFT Hilbert space obtained by modular quantization is argued to be isomorphic to the Hilbert space of a one-sided AdS$_2$ black hole, with a conformal boundary condition on a stretched horizon. The proposal matters because it provides a concrete CFT-side construction, independent of matrix-model ensembles, in which black hole entropy emerges as thermal entropy $S = c\Lambda\sqrt{d}/6$ and the high-energy density of states matches the JT result up to a fixed energy rescaling. It also yields a Page-curve-like entanglement entropy in a conformally glued black hole–Poincaré geometry, with the Page time set by the stretched horizon cutoff.

What carries the argument

The central object is the SL(2,R)-deformed CFT Hamiltonian on a strip, $H = \beta(L_1 + L_{-1} + \bar{L}_{1} + \bar{L}_{-1})$, whose heating-phase dynamics is equivalent to a CFT on a one-sided AdS$_2$ black hole background. Modular quantization of this Hamiltonian, namely the construction of eigenmodes with a fixed-point cutoff $\epsilon$, yields a modular Virasoro algebra with effective central charge $c_{\mathrm{eff}}=c\Lambda$; this algebra carries the argument. The conformal boundary condition $T(\omega)-\bar{T}(\bar{\omega})=0$ at the stretched horizon $\theta=\Lambda$ defines the Hilbert space, and the identification $a/(4G_N)=c\Lambda/3$ together with the energy rescaling $aE'=E$ produces the quantitative matches with JT gravity.

What would settle it

Compute the deformed-CFT partition function on the strip at subleading order in $1/c$ or $1/\Lambda$ and compare it with the JT gravity partition function; if the subleading corrections do not match once the leading relation $a/(4G_N)=c\Lambda/3$ is imposed, the proposed Hilbert-space isomorphism is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that pure JT gravity in the one-sided AdS$_2$ black hole is described, in the low-energy limit $c\to\infty$ with fixed stretched-horizon cutoff $\Lambda$, by a holographic deformed CFT built from the stress-tensor sector, while the alternative limit $\Lambda\to\infty$ with $c$ fixed describes JT gravity coupled to a non-holographic CFT with $c\sim O(1)$. Under modular quantization on a strip, the deformed Hamiltonian generates a modular Virasoro algebra with effective central charge $c_{\mathrm{eff}}=c\Lambda$; the Hilbert space is defined by imposing conformal boundary conditions at the stretched horizon. The thermal entropy of this Hilbert space reproduces the JT black hole entropy $S_{\mathrm{BH}}=a\sqrt{d}/(8G_2)$, the high-energy density of states takes the Cardy form $e^{2\pi\sqrt{cE/6}}$ and matches the JT density of states once the energy is rescaled by $aE'=E$, and the two-sided black hole Hilbert space factorizes into two one-sided copies. In the $\Lambda\to\infty$ limit, degenerate zero modes of the deformed Hamiltonian appear as conformal primaries localized at the horizon. Using the second classical limit, the paper computes entanglement entropy for dual one-dimensional systems in a black hole–Poincaré glued geometry and obtains a Page-like curve from the quantum extremal surface prescription without an island, with the Page time set by the stretched horizon cutoff.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative agreement with JT gravity is forced by the imposed identification $a/(4G_N)=c\Lambda/3$ together with the energy rescaling $aE'=E$; if the true ultraviolet completion fixes these relations differently, the entropy and density-of-states matches do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the proposal holds, the Hilbert space of one-sided JT gravity can be constructed explicitly from a CFT on a strip with a stretched horizon, giving a UV frame in which black hole entropy is a thermal entropy.
  • The factorization of the two-sided Hilbert space into two one-sided copies follows from the modular-quantization construction, providing a CFT-level explanation of why the two-sided black hole Hilbert space splits.
  • For JT gravity coupled to a finite-central-charge CFT, the classical limit is realized by sending the stretched horizon to the real horizon, where degenerate horizon-localized zero modes become the vacuum sector of the deformed Hamiltonian.
  • The entanglement entropy of the dual 1D systems in a glued black hole–Poincaré geometry follows a Page-like curve from a non-trivial quantum extremal surface even without an island, with the Page time set by the stretched horizon cutoff.
  • The high-energy density of states of the deformed CFT reproduces the JT density of states in both classical limits, up to the same energy rescaling $aE'=E$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this construction is on the right track, the stretched-horizon cutoff is a physical datum encoding the classical limit, so varying $\Lambda$ may interpolate between the pure-JT and JT-plus-matter regimes and define a renormalization-group flow on the CFT side.
  • The degenerate zero modes at the horizon could be a concrete realization of soft-hair states; counting them and matching their degeneracy to subleading gravitational corrections would be a sharp test of the proposal.
  • The absence of an island in the Page-curve calculation suggests that a stretched horizon with conformal boundary conditions may be sufficient to restore unitary entropy evolution in lower-dimensional settings without replica wormholes; comparing the full boundary-state entropy in the deformed CFT with the QES result would test this.
  • The relation $a/(4G_N)=c\Lambda/3$ is currently imposed; deriving it from a microscopic calculation of the central charge as a function of Newton's constant would turn the UV-completion proposal into a predictive framework.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that pure JT gravity in a one-sided AdS2 black hole admits a UV completion in terms of a class of sl(2,R)-deformed CFTs, specifically the 'heating phase' modular Hamiltonians on a strip. In the first classical limit, c → ∞ with fixed stretched-horizon cutoff Λ, the deformed-CFT Hilbert space is claimed to describe pure JT gravity; in the second limit, Λ → ∞ with c fixed at O(1), it is claimed to describe JT gravity coupled to a finite-c CFT. The paper derives a modular Virasoro algebra and Hilbert space, matches thermal entropy and a Cardy-like density of states to JT results, proposes a factorization of two-sided Hilbert space, and computes a Page-curve-like entropy for a glued black-hole/Poincaré system. The authors explicitly describe the quantitative comparisons as zeroth-order consistency checks, and Section 5 clearly labels the discussion of the alternative scaling limit as speculative.

Significance. The proposal is original and, if correct, would be a significant step toward a concrete UV Hilbert space for one-sided JT gravity and a microscopic interpretation of the stretched horizon and of Page-curve behavior without islands. The manuscript contains substantial technical work, including the cutoff modular Virasoro algebra (A.18), the partition-function derivation (A.39)–(A.42), and a factorization argument for the two-sided Hilbert space. The authors are transparent about the speculative nature of the project: Section 5 describes the checks as zeroth order and explicitly raises open questions about the status of pure quantum JT gravity. The central weakness is that the principal quantitative agreements are enforced by parameter identifications and by an assumed boundary condition, so the paper currently establishes plausibility rather than independent support for the UV-completion claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Eq (3.13); Appendix A, Eqs (A.42)–(A.43)] The thermal-entropy match is not an independent check of the proposal. The deformed-CFT Hamiltonian in Eq (2.13) contains a Schwarzian term with coefficient cΛ/(12π), and identifying the full Hamiltonian with JT dynamics sets cΛ/(12π) = a/(16πG_N), which is precisely Eq (3.13). Given Eq (3.13), the equality S = cΛ√d/6 = a√d/(8G_N) = S_BH follows algebraically, so Eqs (A.42)–(A.43) restate the identification rather than test it. In the large-c holographic case the relation is anchored by c = 3/(4πG_N) and a = Λ/π from the dimensional reduction, but in the finite-c case it is imposed. The paper should present Eq (3.13) as part of the definition of the proposal and specify which checks, if any, remain independent of it.
  2. [Appendix A, Eq (A.46); abstract, density-of-states claim] In the finite-c limit (Λ → ∞, c fixed, G_N → 0), the claimed high-energy density-of-states match fails functionally. The paper finds ρ_CFT(E) = e^{2π√(cE/6)} and quotes ρ_JT(E') = e^{2π√(aE'/(8πG_N))}. After the rescaling E = aE' in Eq (A.46), equality of these expressions for a range of energies requires c = 3/(4πG_N), which is incompatible with c ∼ O(1) and G_N → 0 in the second classical limit. Only the single microcanonical entropy at E = cΛ²d/(24π²) is matched, again through Eq (3.13). The abstract's 'high-energy density of states match' is therefore unsupported in this regime and should be qualified or corrected.
  3. [§4.3, Eq (4.26) and Eq (4.28)] The key step that S_CFT vanishes when the quantum extremal surface reaches the stretched horizon b* = Λ is asserted without derivation. This is in tension with Eq (4.5), where the same interval (0, Λ) in the TFD setup gives a non-vanishing CFT entropy ∼ (c/3)μΛ, and with Eq (4.22), whose matter-entropy terms do not vanish at b = Λ. Since this vanishing is what converts the linearly growing S_gen into the constant S_BH and produces the Page time s_Page ∼ (3/(cμ))S_BH, the Page-curve claim is not established without a separate argument for the vanishing of the matter term at the cutoff.
  4. [§2.1, Eqs (2.14)–(2.20)] The conformal boundary condition T(Λ) − barT(Λ) = 0 is an assumption, not a derivation. The text shows that the difference vanishes exponentially as Λ → ∞ and then sets it to zero 'for Λ finite yet large'; the modular Virasoro algebra (A.18) and the boundary condition (A.22) depend on this exact condition. This should be stated explicitly as a postulate of the construction, and the extent to which finite-Λ corrections affect the Hilbert space and the later entropy checks should be addressed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, text after Eq (3.44)] The integration constant is denoted ilde a in Eq (3.44) but is called 'c' in the following sentence; this conflicts with the central charge c used throughout the paper.
  2. [§4, notation] The dilaton boundary constant is called 'a' in Section 3 and φ_r in Section 4, while 'a' is also used for the endpoint of the extremal surface; this makes equations such as (4.22) unnecessarily hard to follow.
  3. [Throughout] There are several grammatical slips, for example 'It's action' instead of 'Its action' at the start of Section 3.1 and 'an alternative UV completion' in the abstract; these should be corrected in a final proofreading pass.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq (A.17)] The statement that the normal mode spectrum k = nπ√d / log(√d/(βϵ)) matches the free scalar/fermion spectrum of AdS2 black holes with a stretched horizon would benefit from a citation or a short derivation, since it is used to motivate the cutoff relation.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Quantitative checks of the UV-completion claim are partly enforced: Eq. (3.13) sets cΛ/3 = a/(4G_N), making the entropy and density-of-states matches restatements of that identification; the Page curve additionally asserts that S_CFT vanishes at the stretched-horizon cutoff.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.13); used in Sec. A, Eqs. (A.42)-(A.43) and (A.47)]
    "“for non-holographic CFTs with finite c, one should identify c ∝ a ∼ O(1) and Λ ∝ 1/GN; such that a/4GN = cΛ/3. (3.13)” ... “From (3.13), we obtained cΛ/3 = a/(4G2). Hence, S|ceff→∞ = cΛ√d/6 = a√d/(8G2) = SBH.”"

    Equation (3.13) is imposed, not derived, as the bridge between deformed-CFT parameters and JT parameters. Multiplying it by √d/2 gives exactly cΛ√d/6 = a√d/(8G2), i.e. the thermal entropy equality S = S_BH. Likewise, Eq. (A.47) selects E = cΛ²d/(24π²) so that the microcanonical entropy reproduces S_BH by the same relation. The claimed 'match' is therefore the same equation as the input identification, not an independent prediction of the deformed-CFT construction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Appendix A, Eq. (A.46); also Sec. 2.2, 'high energy density of state']
    "“In fact these two coincide, ρ(E)CFT = ρ(E′)JT = e^{2π√(aE′/(8πG2))}, if aE′ = E. (A.46)”"

    The Cardy density ρ(E)_CFT = e^{2π√(cE/6)} is made to agree with the JT Schwarzian density ρ(E')_JT = e^{2π√(aE'/(8πG))} by imposing the energy rescaling aE' = E. Combined with (3.13), this is equivalent to assuming the coefficient equality already used for the entropy match. For finite c and G_N → 0, a generic range of E' would require c = 3/(4πG_N) to force the functional forms to coincide, so the abstract's 'high-energy density of states match' is not a free check but a consequence of the chosen identification.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [Sec. 4.3, after Eq. (4.25); Eqs. (4.26) and (4.28)]
    "“Once the extremal surface reaches the cut-off b∗ = Λ, the SCFT part will become vanishing. This will in turn gives Snon−trivial ∼ µϕr/(4G) = SBH (4.26)” and “sPage ∼ 3/(cµ) SBH ∝ Λ (4.28)”."

    The Page-curve saturation is obtained by asserting, without derivation, that S_CFT vanishes when b* = Λ. That assertion is an input, not a consequence of the deformed-CFT Hilbert space, and it is in tension with the non-vanishing interval entropies computed in (4.5) and (4.22). The final value S_BH and the scaling s_Page ∝ Λ then follow from (3.13), so the Page time and saturation are built from the same imposed identification rather than being independent predictions.

full rationale

The paper contains a genuine proposal: pure JT gravity and JT coupled to a finite-c CFT may be UV-completed by SL(2,R)-deformed CFTs on a strip, with a conformal boundary condition at a stretched horizon. The modular-quantization Hilbert space itself is a substantive construction, and the large-c/holographic branch has an external anchor in the known dimensional reduction of AdS-Rindler to JT gravity (with a = Λ/π and c = 3/(4πG_N) inherited from 3D Einstein gravity). However, the paper's quantitative 'checks' in the finite-c classical limit are not independent of the proposal. Equation (3.13), a/(4G_N) = cΛ/3, is introduced as the identification between the deformed-CFT Schwarzian coefficient and the JT ADM Hamiltonian; the thermal entropy equality S = cΛ√d/6 = a√d/(8G_N) is literally the same algebraic relation multiplied by √d/2. The density-of-states match in (A.46) is also enforced by the imposed rescaling aE' = E, and the microcanonical entropy check (A.47) selects the single energy at which this identification reproduces S_BH. The Page-curve section further relies on an asserted vanishing of the matter entropy at the stretched-horizon cutoff, which is not derived and is in tension with earlier interval-entropy computations. These are not cases of mere self-citation: the cited prior work on modular quantization is not being used as a circular uniqueness theorem, and the holographic large-c limit is anchored externally. But several of the central quantitative agreements reduce to the assumed parameter identifications, so the paper is partially circular in its support for the UV-completion claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on several postulates: the Hilbert-space isomorphism between modular quantization on a strip and JT gravity (Eqs 1.21-1.23), the identification of the strip vacuum with AdS2 vacua (Eq 3.20), the emergent conformal boundary condition at finite cutoff (Eq 2.20), and the parameter identifications (3.13) and (A.46) that make entropy and density of states match. The vanishing of matter entanglement at the cutoff in the QES calculation (Section 4.3) is an additional ad hoc input. None of these are derived from independent first principles; they define the proposal.

free parameters (4)
  • a/(4G_N) = cLambda/3 identification = a/(4G_N) = cLambda/3
    Eq (3.13). This identification is chosen so that the deformed CFT thermal entropy S = cLambda*sqrt(d)/6 equals the JT black hole entropy a*sqrt(d)/(8G_N); it is not derived from either theory.
  • a = Lambda/pi (pure JT holographic case) = a = Lambda/pi, c = 3/(4 pi G_2)
    Appendix A. These identifications from the half dimensional reduction of AdS3 Rindler set the boundary dilaton and central charge; the entropy then matches the half-BTZ entropy.
  • energy rescaling E' = E/a = aE' = E
    Eq (A.46). The CFT density of states e^(2 pi sqrt(cE/6)) is equated to the JT density of states e^(2 pi sqrt(2CE')) only after rescaling energy by the dilaton boundary value a; this mapping is imposed.
  • gluing integration constant tilde a = arbitrary constant
    Eq (3.44). The constant term in the on-shell gluing action (3.45) is undetermined by the conformal interface conditions.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard Virasoro algebra, conformal Ward identities, twist operator OPE, and saddle point approximations are used throughout.
    Background assumptions of 2D CFT, not proven in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Hilbert space of modular quantization on a strip in the ceff to infinity limit is isomorphic to the Hilbert space of pure JT gravity in a one-sided AdS2 black hole (or JT coupled to a finite-c CFT in the other limit).
    This is the central proposal; eqs (1.21)-(1.23). It is motivated by structural similarity, not proven.
  • domain assumption The vacuum of the deformed CFT on the strip |0>_S is identical to the global, Poincare, Hartle-Hawking, and topped-up Boulware vacuum of AdS2.
    Eq (3.20). This identification underlies the stress tensor expectation values and thermal interpretation used in Sections 3 and 4.
  • ad hoc to paper The boundary condition T(Lambda) - bar T(Lambda) = 0 holds for finite large Lambda.
    Eqs (2.18)-(2.20). The asymptotic argument only proves the difference vanishes at Lambda to infinity; the paper asserts 'without loss of generality' the same boundary condition at finite cutoff.
  • ad hoc to paper S_CFT vanishes when the quantum extremal surface reaches the stretched horizon cutoff b* = Lambda.
    Section 4.3, eq (4.26). This is the step that turns the linearly growing non-trivial QES into S = S_BH and produces the Page-like curve; no derivation is given.
invented entities (2)
  • Emergent conformal boundary condition at the stretched horizon (theta = Lambda)
    purpose: Defines the Hilbert space of modular quantization and provides the UV frame in which the deformed CFT is dual to JT gravity; also controls the Page time in Section 4.
    Postulated to make the heating-phase Hamiltonian well-defined on the strip; introduced in eqs (2.13)-(2.20) and used as the load-bearing boundary condition in Appendix A. No independent falsifiable handle beyond this paper is provided.
  • Degenerate zero-mode sector of the deformed Hamiltonian (conformal primaries at the horizon)
    purpose: Explains the residual boundary-condition effect in the Lambda to infinity limit and connects to emergent near-horizon conformal symmetry; also identified with soft modes at the horizon in Section 2.2.
    Constructed in Appendix A (eqs A.29-A.37); a prediction of the framework with no external falsifiable test specified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JT gravity and deformed CFTs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C36UU63O

@misc{pith2026250717889,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JT gravity and deformed CFTs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C36UU63O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17889}
}
abstract

We propose alternative \textit{UV completion} of pure JT gravity as well as CFT coupled to JT gravity, via a class of \textit{deformed} 2D CFT. In AdS/CFT with a prescribed classical limit, pure JT gravity in \textit{one-sided} AdS$_{2}$ black hole is argued to be described by certain holographic deformed CFT on a strip. Equivalently, these deformed CFTs can be recast as CFTs on one-sided AdS$_{2}$ black hole with \textit{emergent conformal boundary condition on a stretched horizon}$-$providing a \textit{proper UV frame} of JT gravity. On the other hand, JT gravity coupled to CFT with fixed central charge of $\mathcal{O}(1)$, is also described by deformed CFT on strip satisfying conformal boundary condition, with a different classical limit. The resulting CFT Hilbert spaces in both of the above classical limits yield the black hole entropy as thermal entropy and the high-energy density of states match that of JT gravity with a precise energy scale correspondence. Moreover, the Hilbert space defined for a two-sided black hole factorizes into two one-sided sectors in both limits. Notably in the second limit, degenerate zero modes of the deformed Hamiltonian$-$characterized by conformal primaries localized at the horizon$-$appear as a residual effect of the stretched horizon boundary condition. Exploiting the second limit, we compute entanglement entropy in one-dimensional quantum systems dual to a conformally glued black hole$-$Poincar\'e geometry in JT gravity, reproducing a `Page curve' via the quantum extremal surface prescription, with `Page time' set by the stretched horizon cutoff.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17889 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Strip to UHP mapping: the constant t˜ line maps to a semi-circle on UHP. Two opposite arrows along the semi-circle indicate two contours C and C¯ corresponding to holomorphic and anti￾holomorphic Virasoro modes on UHP. Here, the contours C and C¯ refer to a half circle around the origin of UHP as shown in fig(1). A natural boundary condition on the strip would be to impose that no momentum flows across the boundarie… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dual to two 1D system in TFD: two-sided BH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dual to gluing of two same 1D systems (iii) Two coupled (same) 1d systems: Interesting set-up will be involved by coupling two 1d systems. In JT gravity set-up, the coupling is generated by an existence of conformal interface where conformal boundary condition is imposed. The simplest case is to study coupling of two same AdS2 spacetime in JT gravity coupled to CFT via transparent boundary condition in conformal mat… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dual to two coupled 1D systems in TFD. Four triangles from left to right are labeled by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Black hole-Poincare gluing To obtain the non-trivial QES, here we need to find solution of extremization in both AdS spacetimes. In the context of gravitating bath, this type of extremization has been used [54]. The modified QES proposal would be S non−trivial = min [e…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Contours of modular quantization on UHP( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The other side of constant s contour is denoted in the dashed line. One can obtain the same expression for non-holographic CFT by taking same value of E = cΛ2 24π2 and using (3.13) . In this way, we can see that microcanonical and thermal entropy coincides with the one…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, “Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,” JHEP11 (2015), 014 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)014 [arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Chaos in AdS 2 Holography,

    K. Jensen, “Chaos in AdS 2 Holography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) no.11, 111601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.111601 [arXiv:1605.06098 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimen- sional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, “Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimen- sional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,” PTEP 2016 (2016) no.12, 12C104 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw124 [arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holog- raphy,

    J. Engels¨ oy, T. G. Mertens and H. Verlinde, “An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holog- raphy,” JHEP 07 (2016), 139 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)139 [arXiv:1606.03438 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,

    D. Stanford and E. Witten, “Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,” JHEP10 (2017), 008 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)008 [arXiv:1703.04612 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,” Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.10, 106002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.106002 [arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]]. 37They are same deformed Hamiltonian made out of same SL(2, R) generators in UHP and LHP respectively. 53

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Statistical mechanics of a two-dimensional black hole,

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, “Statistical mechanics of a two-dimensional black hole,” JHEP 05 (2019), 198 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)198 [arXiv:1808.07032 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,

    Z. Yang, “The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,” JHEP 05 (2019), 205 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)205 [arXiv:1809.08647 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Algebras and States in JT Gravity,

    G. Penington and E. Witten, “Algebras and States in JT Gravity,” [arXiv:2301.07257 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,

    T. G. Mertens and G. J. Turiaci, “Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,” Living Rev. Rel. 26 (2023) no.1, 4 doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00046-1 [arXiv:2210.10846 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Thermoelectric trans- port in disordered metals without quasiparticles: The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and hologra- phy,

    R. A. Davison, W. Fu, A. Georges, Y. Gu, K. Jensen and S. Sachdev, “Thermoelectric trans- port in disordered metals without quasiparticles: The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and hologra- phy,” Phys. Rev. B95 (2017) no.15, 155131 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155131 [arXiv:1612.00849 [con...

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    On the Dynamics of Near- Extremal Black Holes,

    P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R. M. Soni, S. P. Trivedi and V. Vishal, “On the Dynamics of Near- Extremal Black Holes,” JHEP 09 (2018), 048 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)048 [arXiv:1802.09547 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,

    L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, “The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,” JHEP 05 (2021), 145 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)145 [arXiv:2003.02860 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    JT gravity as a matrix integral,

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “JT gravity as a matrix integral,” [arXiv:1903.11115 [hep-th]]

    1903 arXiv

  7. [15]

    The path integral of 3D gravity near extremality; or, JT grav- ity with defects as a matrix integral,

    H. Maxfield and G. J. Turiaci, “The path integral of 3D gravity near extremality; or, JT grav- ity with defects as a matrix integral,” JHEP 01 (2021), 118 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2021)118 [arXiv:2006.11317 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet,

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, “Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993), 3339 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3339 [arXiv:cond- mat/9212030 [cond-mat]]

    1993

  9. [17]

    Holographic metals and the fractionalized Fermi liquid,

    S. Sachdev, “Holographic metals and the fractionalized Fermi liquid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010), 151602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.151602 [arXiv:1006.3794 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [18]

    A Simple Model Of Quantum Holography,

    A. Kitaev, “A Simple Model Of Quantum Holography,” talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/. 54

    2015

  11. [19]

    The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,

    D. Harlow and D. Jafferis, “The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,” JHEP 02 (2020), 177 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)177 [arXiv:1804.01081 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Relating black holes in two-dimensions and three-dimensions,

    A. Achucarro and M. E. Ortiz, “Relating black holes in two-dimensions and three-dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993), 3600-3605 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3600 [arXiv:hep-th/9304068 [hep- th]]

    1993 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Global charges in Chern-Simons field theory and the (2+1) black hole,

    M. Banados, “Global charges in Chern-Simons field theory and the (2+1) black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 52 (1996), 5816-5825 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5816

    1996 doi

  14. [22]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,” Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986), 207-226 doi:10.1007/BF01211590

    1986 doi

  15. [23]

    Geometry of the (2+1) black hole,

    M. Banados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, “Geometry of the (2+1) black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993), 1506-1525 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013), 069902] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.1506 [arXiv:gr-qc/9302012 [gr-qc]]

    1993 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Stretched horizon from conformal field theory,

    S. Das, “Stretched horizon from conformal field theory,” JHEP 11 (2024), 033 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)033 [arXiv:2406.10879 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Notes on heating phase dynamics in Floquet CFTs and Modular quantization,

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, S. Porey and B. Roy, “Notes on heating phase dynamics in Floquet CFTs and Modular quantization,” [arXiv:2406.10899 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory,

    J. Cardy and E. Tonni, “Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory,” J. Stat. Mech. 1612 (2016) no.12, 123103 doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/12/123103 [arXiv:1608.01283 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Floquet conformal field theory,

    X. Wen and J. Q. Wu, “Floquet conformal field theory,” [arXiv:1805.00031 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Emergent Spatial Structure and Entangle- ment Localization in Floquet Conformal Field Theory,

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath and X. Wen, “Emergent Spatial Structure and Entangle- ment Localization in Floquet Conformal Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020) no.3, 031036 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031036 [arXiv:1908.05289 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories,

    X. Wen, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath and Y. Gu, “Periodically, quasiperiodically, and randomly driven conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (2021) no.2, 023044 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023044 [arXiv:2006.10072 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Conformal Floquet dynamics with a continuous drive protocol,

    D. Das, R. Ghosh and K. Sengupta, “Conformal Floquet dynamics with a continuous drive protocol,” JHEP 05 (2021), 172 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)172 [arXiv:2101.04140 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Brane detec- tors of a dynamical phase transition in a driven CFT,

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, A. Kundu, S. Porey, B. Roy and K. Sengupta, “Brane detec- tors of a dynamical phase transition in a driven CFT,” SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) no.5, 202 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.5.202 [arXiv:2212.04201 [hep-th]]. 55

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy,

    D. L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S. J. Suh, “Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy,” JHEP 06 (2016), 004 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)004 [arXiv:1512.06431 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Conformal description of horizon’s states,

    S. N. Solodukhin, “Conformal description of horizon’s states,” Phys. Lett. B 454 (1999), 213-222 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00398-6 [arXiv:hep-th/9812056 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  26. [34]

    From the BTZ black hole to JT gravity: geometrizing the island,

    E. Verheijden and E. Verlinde, “From the BTZ black hole to JT gravity: geometrizing the island,” JHEP 11 (2021), 092 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)092 [arXiv:2102.00922 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theo- ries,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theo- ries,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998), 505-532 doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n3.a3 [arXiv:hep- th/9803131 [hep-th]]

    1998

  28. [36]

    A smooth horizon without a smooth horizon,

    V. Burman, S. Das and C. Krishnan, “A smooth horizon without a smooth horizon,” JHEP 2024 (2024), 014 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)014 [arXiv:2312.14108 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Soft Hair on Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, “Soft Hair on Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) no.23, 231301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.231301 [arXiv:1601.00921 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Black Hole Entropy and Soft Hair,

    S. Haco, S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, “Black Hole Entropy and Soft Hair,” JHEP 12 (2018), 098 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2018)098 [arXiv:1810.01847 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu, “Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) no.8, 086020 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.086020 [arXiv:2112.12156 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Vacuum states for AdS(2) black holes,

    M. Spradlin and A. Strominger, “Vacuum states for AdS(2) black holes,” JHEP 11 (1999), 021 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/11/021 [arXiv:hep-th/9904143 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Black holes, brick walls and the Boulware state,

    S. Mukohyama and W. Israel, “Black holes, brick walls and the Boulware state,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998), 104005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.104005 [arXiv:gr-qc/9806012 [gr-qc]]

    1998 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A type I approximation of the crossed product,

    R. M. Soni, “A type I approximation of the crossed product,” JHEP 01 (2024), 123 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)123 [arXiv:2307.12481 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Colliders and conformal interfaces,

    M. Meineri, J. Penedones and A. Rousset, “Colliders and conformal interfaces,” JHEP02 (2020), 138 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)138 [arXiv:1904.10974 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Membranes, holography, and quantum information,

    V. Papadopoulos, “Membranes, holography, and quantum information,” [arXiv:2310.18521 [hep- th]]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Is boundary conformal in CFT?,

    Y. Nakayama, “Is boundary conformal in CFT?,” Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) no.4, 046005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.046005 [arXiv:1210.6439 [hep-th]]. 56

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,” JHEP 09 (2020), 002 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)002 [arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,” JHEP 12 (2019), 063 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)063 [arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, “The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,” JHEP 03 (2020), 149 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)149 [arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Islands outside the horizon,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena, “Islands outside the horizon,” [arXiv:1910.11077 [hep-th]]

    1910 arXiv

  42. [50]

    The entropy of Hawk- ing radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawk- ing radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021) no.3, 035002 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035002 [arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Lectures on Quantum Extremal Surfaces and the Page Curve,

    R. Mahajan, “Lectures on Quantum Extremal Surfaces and the Page Curve,” [arXiv:2502.01933 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,” JHEP 01 (2015), 073 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)073 [arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Massive islands,

    H. Geng and A. Karch, “Massive islands,” JHEP 09 (2020), 121 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)121 [arXiv:2006.02438 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas and S. Shashi, “Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,” SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) no.5, 103 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.5.103 [arXiv:2012.04671 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas and S. Shashi, “Inconsistency of islands in theories with long-range gravity,” JHEP 01 (2022), 182 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)182 [arXiv:2107.03390 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    An apologia for islands,

    S. Antonini, C. H. Chen, H. Maxfield and G. Penington, “An apologia for islands,” [arXiv:2506.04311 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,” JHEP 05 (2020), 013 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)013 [arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]]. 57

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Quantum Ex- tremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane,

    H. Z. Chen, R. C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I. A. Reyes and J. Sandor, “Quantum Ex- tremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane,” JHEP 10 (2020), 166 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2020)166 [arXiv:2006.04851 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Quantum Ex- tremal Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane,

    H. Z. Chen, R. C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I. A. Reyes and J. Sandor, “Quantum Ex- tremal Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane,” JHEP 12 (2020), 025 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2020)025 [arXiv:2010.00018 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Islands in cosmology,

    T. Hartman, Y. Jiang and E. Shaghoulian, “Islands in cosmology,” JHEP 11 (2020), 111 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)111 [arXiv:2008.01022 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Page Curve and the Information Paradox in Flat Space,

    C. Krishnan, V. Patil and J. Pereira, “Page Curve and the Information Paradox in Flat Space,” [arXiv:2005.02993 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Islands far outside the horizon,

    R. Bousso and G. Penington, “Islands far outside the horizon,” JHEP 11 (2024), 164 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)164 [arXiv:2312.03078 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Holographic moving mirrors,

    I. Akal, Y. Kusuki, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei, “Holographic moving mirrors,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) no.22, 224001 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac2c1b [arXiv:2106.11179 [hep- th]]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Moving interfaces and two-dimensional black holes,

    P. Biswas, S. Das and A. Dinda, “Moving interfaces and two-dimensional black holes,” JHEP 05 (2024), 329 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)329 [arXiv:2401.11451 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,

    S. D. Mathur, “The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009), 224001 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001 [arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Black Holes: Complementarity or Fire- walls?,

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, “Black Holes: Complementarity or Fire- walls?,” JHEP 02 (2013), 062 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2013)062 [arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited,

    E. Witten, “Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited,” [arXiv:0706.3359 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions,

    A. Maloney and E. Witten, “Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions,” JHEP 02 (2010), 029 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)029 [arXiv:0712.0155 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  61. [69]

    The Gravity Dual of the Ising Model,

    A. Castro, M. R. Gaberdiel, T. Hartman, A. Maloney and R. Volpato, “The Gravity Dual of the Ising Model,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012), 024032 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024032 [arXiv:1111.1987 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,

    T. G. Mertens, G. J. Turiaci and H. L. Verlinde, “Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,” JHEP 08 (2017), 136 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)136 [arXiv:1705.08408 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    The Schwarzian theory — origins,

    T. G. Mertens, “The Schwarzian theory — origins,” JHEP 05 (2018), 036 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2018)036 [arXiv:1801.09605 [hep-th]]. 58

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Out-of-Time-Order cor- relators in driven conformal field theories,

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, A. Kundu, S. Porey, B. Roy and K. Sengupta, “Out-of-Time-Order cor- relators in driven conformal field theories,” JHEP 08 (2022), 221 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)221 [arXiv:2202.12815 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Entanglement asymmetry in periodically driven quantum systems,

    T. Banerjee, S. Das and K. Sengupta, “Entanglement asymmetry in periodically driven quantum systems,” [arXiv:2412.03654 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv

  66. [74]

    A Bottom-Up Approach to Black Hole Microstates,

    V. Burman and C. Krishnan, “A Bottom-Up Approach to Black Hole Microstates,” [arXiv:2409.05850 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Holomorphic Factorization at the Quantum Horizon,

    C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak, “Holomorphic Factorization at the Quantum Horizon,” [arXiv:2410.00732 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Brickwall, normal modes, and emerg- ing thermality,

    S. Banerjee, S. Das, M. Dorband and A. Kundu, “Brickwall, normal modes, and emerg- ing thermality,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.12, 126020 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.126020 [arXiv:2401.01417 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Brick Wall in AdS-Schwarzschild Black Hole: Normal Modes and Emerging Thermality,

    S. Das, S. Porey and B. Roy, “Brick Wall in AdS-Schwarzschild Black Hole: Normal Modes and Emerging Thermality,” [arXiv:2409.05519 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Blackish Holes,

    S. Banerjee, S. Das, A. Kundu and M. Sittinger, “Blackish Holes,” [arXiv:2411.09500 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Conformal description of near-horizon vacuum states,

    T. Banks and K. M. Zurek, “Conformal description of near-horizon vacuum states,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.12, 126026 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.126026 [arXiv:2108.04806 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Dipolar quantization and the infinite circumference limit of two-dimensional conformal field theories,

    N. Ishibashi and T. Tada, “Dipolar quantization and the infinite circumference limit of two-dimensional conformal field theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (2016) no.32, 1650170 doi:10.1142/S0217751X16501700 [arXiv:1602.01190 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Time development of conformal field theories associated with L1 and L−1 operators,

    T. Tada, “Time development of conformal field theories associated with L1 and L−1 operators,” J. Phys. A 53 (2020) no.25, 255401 doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab8c63 [arXiv:1904.12414 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Boundary conformal field theory,

    J. L. Cardy, “Boundary conformal field theory,” [arXiv:hep-th/0411189 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Real time dynamics from low point correlators in 2d BCFT,

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan and A. Kundu, “Real time dynamics from low point correlators in 2d BCFT,” JHEP 12 (2019), 141 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)141 [arXiv:1907.08763 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Virasoro algebras, kinematic space and the spec- trum of modular Hamiltonians in CFT 2,

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan, S. Porey and B. Roy, “Virasoro algebras, kinematic space and the spec- trum of modular Hamiltonians in CFT 2,” JHEP 21 (2020), 123 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)123 [arXiv:2101.10211 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  77. [85]

    The split property for quantum field theories in flat and curved space- times.,

    C. J. Fewster, “The split property for quantum field theories in flat and curved space- times.,” Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 86 (2016) no.2, 153-175 doi:10.1007/s12188-016- 0130-9 [arXiv:1601.06936 [math-ph]]. 59

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.