Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 29 references

Anomalous magnetic behavior and complex magnetic structure of proximate LaCrO3 LaFeO3 system

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a physical mixture of LaCrO3 and LaFeO3 grains shows two distinct magnetic transitions—a weak ferromagnetic state near 290 K and an antiferromagnetic state near 250 K.

desk verdict The paper reports a genuinely new two-transition observation in a mixed LaCrO3-LaFeO3 sample, but the proximity-coupling interpretation is unsupported because the data are equally consistent with a simple superposition of independent grain responses. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06450 v1 pith:C37PLW5Q submitted 2019-08-18 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Brajesh Tiwari , Ambesh Dixit , M. S. Ramachandra Rao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magnetismproximityeffectweakferromagnetismantiferromagnetismLaCrO3-LaFeO3spin-phononcouplingRamanspectroscopymagneticphasediagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports magnetization and Raman measurements on a mixed-phase sample of the two antiferromagnetic perovskites LaCrO3 and LaFeO3 and claims that placing them in close physical proximity produces a new magnetic sequence: a weak ferromagnetic state sets in near 290 K and persists to about 250 K, where antiferromagnetic order takes over. The 290 K feature is tied to LaCrO3's own transition, and the claim is that the nearby LaFeO3 sublattice reorients the Cr spins along its weak-ferromagnetic direction, enlarging the ferromagnetic component. The 250 K transition is frequency independent in AC susceptibility, so the paper interprets it as intrinsic long-range ordering rather than spin-glass freezing. Temperature-dependent Raman shows the first-to-second-order $B_{2g}(1)$ intensity ratio rising near the low-temperature transition, which the authors take as evidence of spin-phonon coupling. If true, the result offers a simple mixed-oxide route to a metastable ferromagnetic phase near room temperature and to magnetodielectric-type functionality.

What carries the argument

The mechanism proposed is proximity-induced spin reorientation: the weak-ferromagnetic LaFeO3 sublattice exerts an exchange influence on the adjacent LaCrO3 sublattice, aligning Cr spins with the Fe weak-ferromagnetic direction once LaCrO3 orders near 290 K, until Cr-Cr antiferromagnetic superexchange reasserts itself near 250 K. The diagnostic that carries the low-temperature claim is the temperature-dependent Raman first-to-second-order $B_{2g}(1)$ intensity ratio, which shows a sharp enhancement when the magnetic order changes and serves as the paper's main evidence for spin-phonon coupling.

What would settle it

Element-specific magnetization or neutron diffraction would settle the claim: if the Cr and Fe sublattices each follow their single-phase behavior with no cross-coupled reorientation, the proximity-coupling explanation is wrong, and the 250 K feature would be revealed as the superposition of independent grain responses. A neutron pattern would also show whether the low-temperature state is one magnetic order or two coexisting orders.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery claim is that the proximate LaCrO3-LaFeO3 system has two distinct magnetic transitions, at roughly 290 K and 250 K, instead of a single averaged response. Below 290 K, LaCrO3 orders antiferromagnetically, but the neighboring LaFeO3 sublattice, with its canted weak-ferromagnetic Fe spins, reorients the Cr spins into a more strongly ferromagnetic arrangement, creating a metastable ferromagnetic phase. Below 250 K, the Cr-based antiferromagnetic coupling dominates again, so the system enters a low-temperature antiferromagnetic state that still carries a weak ferromagnetic component; the magnetization does not saturate up to 5 T because the antiferromagnetic backbone persists. The paper supports the 250 K ordering with the temperature dependence of the $B_{2g}(1)$ Raman intensity ratio, attributed to spin-phonon coupling, and summarizes the sequence in a phase diagram running from paramagnetic, through LaFeO3-dominated antiferromagnetic, through the metastable ferromagnetic window between 250 and 290 K.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the two oxide materials sit in close contact as separate grains and genuinely exchange magnetic influence across their boundaries, so the measured 250 K transition reflects coupling rather than just the independent magnetic responses of the two components.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A metastable ferromagnetic phase near room temperature can be produced in an undoped, mixed-oxide perovskite by controlling grain contact, not only by chemical substitution.
  • The frequency independence of the 250 K transition marks it as true long-range magnetic order, so the system is a two-stage magnetic switch between 290 K and 250 K.
  • The observed spin-phonon coupling implies that lattice strain or electric fields could perturb the magnetic ordering, opening a route to magnetodielectric behavior in mixed-phase ceramics.
  • Because the magnetization does not saturate even at 5 T inside the ferromagnetic window, any application must work with a canted, non-collinear moment rather than a fully aligned one.
  • The proposed phase diagram gives concrete temperature targets for testing the metastable state with element-specific or neutron scattering probes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test of the proximity mechanism would be element-specific magnetization at the Cr and Fe edges: if the two sublattices track their parent-phase behavior independently, the 250 K feature is a superposition of independent grain responses, while a Cr-spin reorientation that appears only when Fe polarizes would confirm the interfacial-coupling picture.
  • If interface exchange drives the effect, the 250 K transition and the remanent moment should vary systematically with grain size, sintering time, and contact area, making microstructure a tunable control parameter.
  • The Raman intensity-ratio signature could be developed into an optical readout of magnetic order in other mixed-phase magnets, although the assignment of the second-order feature would need independent confirmation.
  • The model implies that the metastable ferromagnetic state is stabilized by grain-boundary coupling and should weaken in well-separated powders or disappear in a fully interdiffused single-phase double perovskite, a distinction future synthesis can test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports structural, magnetic, and Raman measurements on a mixed-phase LaCrO3-LaFeO3 system prepared by solid-state reaction. The authors identify two magnetic transitions at approximately 290 K and 250 K, attribute them to a proximity-driven competition between Cr and Fe sublattices, and construct a temperature-magnetic phase diagram with a metastable ferromagnetic phase near room temperature. The paper claims that the 290 K transition corresponds to the LaCrO3 Neel transition modified by the proximate LaFeO3, and that the 250 K transition is a new antiferromagnetic ordering caused by competing Cr-Fe interactions. The evidence is based on DC and AC magnetization, magnetization isotherms, and temperature-dependent Raman data.

Significance. The claim is potentially interesting because proximity-induced magnetic reorientation in a simple mixed-phase oxide could provide a low-cost route to room-temperature metastable ferromagnetism and to tunable spin-lattice coupling. However, the significance is conditional: the manuscript does not provide the control measurements needed to distinguish a genuine proximity effect from a trivial superposition of independent LaCrO3 and LaFeO3 grains. The current data are consistent with the null model, and the text itself invokes additive contributions in the interpretation of the isotherms. No neutron diffraction, element-specific magnetization, or microstructure analysis is presented. The paper is honest in stating that further investigations are needed, but the central interpretive claim is not yet supported by the evidence shown.

major comments (5)
  1. [Results, Fig. 1] The XRD pattern of the sample is described in the text as 'the superimposed XRD spectrum of these pristine materials,' which explicitly establishes a two-phase physical mixture. The central claim that the 250 K transition and the enhanced weak-ferromagnetic moment arise from Cr-Fe exchange across grain boundaries requires ruling out the independent-grain superposition of LaCrO3 and LaFeO3 responses. The paper provides no such test, and no magnetization curves of pristine LaCrO3 and LaFeO3 measured under identical conditions are shown for comparison.
  2. [Results, Fig. 4] The interpretation of the magnetization isotherms is itself a superposition argument: at 315 K 'only LaFeO3 weak ferromagnetic component is contributing' and at lower temperatures 'the contribution of LaCrO3 weak ferromagnetic component is also added.' This additive reasoning is exactly the null model and cannot serve as evidence for proximity coupling. A quantitative decomposition or a control experiment with a physical mixture prepared without the annealing step would be needed to separate the two contributions.
  3. [Results, Fig. 3] The frequency independence of the 250 K transition is presented as ruling out spin-glass or cluster impurities. This argument is insufficient because a superposition of two long-range-ordered antiferromagnets also produces frequency-independent features. The AC data therefore do not establish that the 250 K feature is intrinsic to a coupled Cr-Fe phase rather than a sum of two independent magnetic responses.
  4. [Results, Fig. 2(c)] The temperature-dependent Raman intensity ratio I1/I2 is used to claim spin-phonon coupling below the 250 K transition, but no error bars or fits are provided, and no temperature-dependent Raman data for pristine LaCrO3 or LaFeO3 are shown. Without these controls, the anomaly cannot be attributed to the proximity effect rather than to the intrinsic LaCrO3 phonon response.
  5. [Fig. 5] The proposed phase diagram labels a high-temperature antiferromagnetic phase above 740 K and discrete phase boundaries, but the magnetization measurements cover only 100-350 K and the Raman data only 100-300 K. The phase diagram extrapolates beyond the measured range and is therefore not supported by the presented data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the typo 'LaCrO3-LaFeO6'; the correct formula should be LaCrO3-LaFeO3.
  2. [Figure captions and text] The manuscript interchangeably uses 'LaCrO3-LaFeO3' and 'La2FeCrO6' in the text and figure captions (e.g., Fig. 2 and Fig. 3); this inconsistency must be resolved to avoid confusion with the double perovskite.
  3. [General] The term 'ferrimagnetic' is used for a system that is described as a mixture of two weak-ferromagnetic canted antiferromagnets; the physical basis for calling the combined response ferrimagnetic is not justified and should be clarified or replaced.
  4. [Results, Fig. 3] The DC and AC susceptibility curves are presented without error bars or a description of measurement uncertainty, which is important for a claim of two distinct transitions with close transition temperatures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an experimental report with no fitted parameters, equations, or derivation-by-construction; its interpretive claims are speculative but not circular.

full rationale

The paper contains no equations, no model-fitting, and no parameter that is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction. The two claimed magnetic transitions at ~290 K and ~250 K are read directly from DC and AC magnetization measurements and compared qualitatively with literature values for pristine LaCrO3 and LaFeO3, which are external benchmarks rather than outputs of this paper's own construction. The authors' attributions, such as 'the proximate presence of LaFeO3 tries to reorient the magnetic spin structure of LaCrO3 sublattice along the weak ferromagnetic structure of LaFeO3,' are interpretive explanations of measured data, not conclusions forced by definition or by self-citation. The self-citations (Refs. [2] and [6]) are used as background for known LaCrO3 properties and Raman/dielectric behavior, and they are not load-bearing for the central two-transition claim, which rests on the presented magnetization and Raman data. The skeptical concern that the 250 K anomaly could be an independent-grain superposition rather than proximity-driven Cr-Fe exchange is an alternative interpretation, not a circularity: the paper does not define the proximity effect in terms of the observed transitions, nor does it fit any quantity to itself. No circular step matching the enumerated patterns can be exhibited from the text, so a score of 0 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation rests on several domain assumptions, chiefly that the sample is a clean two-phase mixture and that the observed magnetic and Raman features reflect intrinsic ordering. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math LaCrO3 and LaFeO3 crystallize in the orthorhombic Pnma space group with 24 Raman active modes.
    Used in the Results section to assign Raman modes; this is standard crystallographic group theory applied to the two parent compounds.
  • domain assumption LaCrO3 orders antiferromagnetically near 290 K and LaFeO3 near 710 K.
    Used to assign the 290 K magnetization rise to LaCrO3 and to draw the high-temperature boundary of the phase diagram; the values come from cited literature, including previous work by the authors.
  • domain assumption The observed magnetization features are intrinsic to the mixed-phase sample and are not caused by impurity phases or measurement artifacts.
    The authors use frequency-independent AC susceptibility to rule out spin-glass clusters, but they do not provide chemical phase quantification or element-specific magnetic data; this assumption is load-bearing for interpreting both transitions.
  • domain assumption The increase in the Raman intensity ratio I1/I2 with decreasing temperature is caused by spin-phonon coupling rather than by thermal population effects.
    The authors attribute the Raman anomaly to spin-dependent scattering, but give no baseline normalization or quantitative model for the phonon population contribution.
  • domain assumption The two-phase mixture preserves the individual perovskite structures with close grain contact and no significant interdiffusion beyond proximity.
    XRD is presented as overlapping patterns of the parent compounds, but no Rietveld refinement or microstructural analysis is shown; the proximity-interaction scenario depends on this condition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous magnetic behavior and complex magnetic structure of proximate LaCrO3 LaFeO3 system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C37PLW5Q

@misc{pith2026190806450,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous magnetic behavior and complex magnetic structure of proximate LaCrO3 LaFeO3 system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C37PLW5Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06450}
}
read the original abstract

We investigated complex magnetic properties of multifunctional LaCrO3-LaFeO3 system. The magnetic measurements substantiate the presence of competing complex magnetic ordering against temperature, showing paramagnetic to ferrimagnetic transition at 300 K, followed by antiferromagnetic (AFM) transition near 250 K superimposed on ferrimagnetic phase. The onset of weak ferrimagnetic ordering is attributed to the competing complex interaction between two AFM LaCrO3-LaFeO3 sublattices. The low-temperature AFM ordering is also substantiated by temperature-dependent Raman measurements, where the intensity ratio of 700 cm-1 Raman active mode showed the clear enhancement with lowering the temperature. The non-saturating nature of magnetic moments in LaCrO3-LaFeO6 suggests the predominating AFM ordering in conjunction with ferrimagnetic ordering between 250 K to 300 K up to 5 T magnetic field. A complex magnetic structure of LaCrO3-LaFeO3 is constructed, emphasizing the metastable magnetic phase near room temperature and low temperature antiferromagnetic state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06450 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 (242) (323) (412) (341) (400) (321) (113) (141) (202) (220) (211) (200) (121) (111) 2q (degree) LaCrO3 (101) Intensity (a.u.) LaFeO3 La2CrFeO6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Non-collinear magnetism in distorted perovskite compounds,

    I. V. Solovyev, N. Hamada, and K. Terakura, “Non-collinear magnetism in distorted perovskite compounds,” Phys. B Condens. Matter, vol. 237–238, pp. 44–45, Jul. 1997

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    Magnetostructural and 9 magnetocaloric properties of bulk LaCrO 3 system,

    B. Tiwari, A. Dixit, R. Naik, G. Lawes, and M. S. R. Rao, “Magnetostructural and 9 magnetocaloric properties of bulk LaCrO 3 system,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 026103, 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Electronic band structure and lattice distortion in perovskite transition-metal oxides,

    N. Hamada, H. Sawada, K. Terakura, and I. Solovyev, “Electronic band structure and lattice distortion in perovskite transition-metal oxides,” Phys. B Condens. Matter, vol. 237–238, pp. 11–13, 1997

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Magnetoelectric resonance with electromagnons in a perovskite helimagnet,

    Y. Takahashi, R. Shimano, Y. Kaneko, H. Murakawa, and Y. Tokura, “Magnetoelectric resonance with electromagnons in a perovskite helimagnet,” Nat. Phys., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 121–125, 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Multiferroic behavior of lanthanum orthoferrite (LaFeO3),

    S. Acharya, J. Mondal, S. Ghosh, S. K. Roy, and P. K. Chakrabarti, “Multiferroic behavior of lanthanum orthoferrite (LaFeO3),” Mater. Lett., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 415– 418, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Dielectric and optical phonon anomalies near antiferromagnetic ordering in LaCrO3: A possible near room temperature magnetodielectric system,

    B. Tiwari, A. Dixit, R. Naik, G. Lawes, and M. S. Ramachandra Rao, “Dielectric and optical phonon anomalies near antiferromagnetic ordering in LaCrO3: A possible near room temperature magnetodielectric system,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 103, no. 15, pp. 2011–2014, 2013

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Magnetic structure of LaCrO3 perovskite under high pressure from in situ neutron diffraction,

    J. S. Zhou, J. A. Alonso, A. Muoñz, M. T. Fernández-Díaz, and J. B. Goodenough, “Magnetic structure of LaCrO3 perovskite under high pressure from in situ neutron diffraction,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1–4, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Sol-gel nanocasting synthesis of patterned hierarchical LaFeO3 fibers with enhanced catalytic CO oxidation activity.,

    P. Li, X. Hu, L. Zhang, H. Dai, and L. Zhang, “Sol-gel nanocasting synthesis of patterned hierarchical LaFeO3 fibers with enhanced catalytic CO oxidation activity.,” Nanoscale, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 974–6, Mar. 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Ab initio electronic structure of rare earth orthoferrites,

    M. Iglesias et al., “Ab initio electronic structure of rare earth orthoferrites,” in Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2005, vol. 290–291 PA, pp. 396–399

    2005

  2. [10]

    Mechanism of ferroelectric instabilities in non- d^{0} perovskites: LaCrO_{3} versus CaMnO_{3},

    C. Ederer, T. Harris, and R. Kováčik, “Mechanism of ferroelectric instabilities in non- d^{0} perovskites: LaCrO_{3} versus CaMnO_{3},” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 83, no. 5, p. 10 054110, Feb. 2011

    2011

  3. [11]

    Large spin-phonon coupling and magnetically induced phonon anisotropy in SrMO3 perovskites (M=V,Cr,Mn,Fe,Co),

    J. H. Lee and K. M. Rabe, “Large spin-phonon coupling and magnetically induced phonon anisotropy in SrMO3 perovskites (M=V,Cr,Mn,Fe,Co),” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1–6, 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    Noncollinear magnetism and single-ion anisotropy in multiferroic perovskites,

    C. Weingart, N. Spaldin, and E. Bousquet, “Noncollinear magnetism and single-ion anisotropy in multiferroic perovskites,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, no. 9, p. 094413, Sep. 2012

    2012

  5. [13]

    Metal-insulator transition,

    N. F. Mott, “Metal-insulator transition,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 40, no. 4. pp. 677–683, 1968

    1968

  6. [14]

    Site-Selective Mott Transition in Rare-Earth- Element Nickelates,

    H. Park, A. Millis, and C. Marianetti, “Site-Selective Mott Transition in Rare-Earth- Element Nickelates,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 109, no. 15, pp. 1–5, Oct. 2012

    2012

  7. [15]

    An interpretation of the magnetic properties of the perovskite-type mixed crystals La1−xSrxCoO3−λ,

    J. B. Goodenough, “An interpretation of the magnetic properties of the perovskite-type mixed crystals La1−xSrxCoO3−λ,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids, vol. 6, no. 2–3, pp. 287– 297, Aug. 1958

    1958

  8. [16]

    Possible Half Metallic Antiferromagnetism in a Double Perovskite Material with Strong Spin-Orbit Couplings,

    M. P. Ghimire, L. Wu, and X. Hu, “Possible Half Metallic Antiferromagnetism in a Double Perovskite Material with Strong Spin-Orbit Couplings,” pp. 1–8, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Local electronic and magnetic studies of an artificial La2FeCrO6 double perovskite,

    B. Gray, H. N. Lee, J. Liu, J. Chakhalian, and J. W. Freeland, “Local electronic and magnetic studies of an artificial La2FeCrO6 double perovskite,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 97, no. 1, p. 013105, 2010

    2010

  10. [18]

    Ferrimagnetism and spontaneous ordering of transition-metals in La 2 CrFeO 6 double-perovskite films,

    S. Chakraverty et al., “Ferrimagnetism and spontaneous ordering of transition-metals in La 2 CrFeO 6 double-perovskite films,” pp. 1–11

  11. [19]

    Electronic and magnetic properties of La2FeCrO6: Superexchange interaction for a d5-d3 system,

    K. Miura and K. Terakura, “Electronic and magnetic properties of La2FeCrO6: Superexchange interaction for a d5-d3 system,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 63, no. 10, p. 104402, Feb. 2001

    2001

  12. [20]

    Ferromagnetic Superlattices,

    W. E. Pickett, “Ferromagnetic Superlattices,” Science (80-. )., vol. 281, no. 5383, p. 11 1571a, 1998

    1998

  13. [21]

    Local Electronic and Magnetic Studies of an Artificial La2FeCrO6 Double Perovskite,

    B. Gray, H. N. Lee, J. Liu, J. Chakhalian, and J. W. Freeland, “Local Electronic and Magnetic Studies of an Artificial La2FeCrO6 Double Perovskite,” vol. 013105, pp. 14–17, 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    Mechanosynthesis and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline LaFeO3 using different iron oxides,

    A. A. Cristóbal, P. M. Botta, P. G. Bercoff, and J. M. Porto López, “Mechanosynthesis and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline LaFeO3 using different iron oxides,” Mater. Res. Bull., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1036–1040, 2009

    2009

  15. [23]

    Raman spectroscopy of low-temperature (Pnma) and high-temperature (R3¯c) phases of LaCrO3,

    M. Iliev et al., “Raman spectroscopy of low-temperature (Pnma) and high-temperature (R3¯c) phases of LaCrO3,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 74, no. 21, pp. 1–7, Dec. 2006

    2006

  16. [24]

    Distortion-dependent Raman spectra and mode mixing in RMnO3 perovskites (R=La,Pr,Nd,Sm,Eu,Gd,Tb,Dy,Ho,Y),

    M. Iliev et al., “Distortion-dependent Raman spectra and mode mixing in RMnO3 perovskites (R=La,Pr,Nd,Sm,Eu,Gd,Tb,Dy,Ho,Y),” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 3– 8, Feb. 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    Polaronic relaxation in LaFeO3,

    C. Chen, K. B. Xu, Y. M. Cui, and C. C. Wang, “Polaronic relaxation in LaFeO3,” Mater. Lett., vol. 89, pp. 153–155, Dec. 2012. Figure Captions:

    2012

  18. [26]

    X-ray diffraction of bulk LaCrO 3 and LaFeO3 material with LaCrO 3 (Bottom panel) and LaFeO3 (Middle panel)

  19. [27]

    (b) Temperature-dependent Raman spectra of La2FeCrO6 using 514 nm laser source

    (a) Raman Spectra of LaCrO3, LaFeO3 and La2FeCrO6 at room temperature recorded using 532 nm laser source. (b) Temperature-dependent Raman spectra of La2FeCrO6 using 514 nm laser source. (c) Intensity ratio of first order and second order Raman peak as a function of temperature...

  20. [28]

    Temperature-dependent DC (Zero -Field Cooled and Field Cooled) and AC (at different frequencies) magnetic susceptibility plots for La2FeCrO3 . 12

  21. [29]

    Figures: Figure 1

    Representative isothermal magnetization loops close to magnetic transitions. Figures: Figure 1. 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 (242) (323) (412) (341) (400) (321) (113) (141) (202) (220) (211) (200) (121) (111) 2q (degree) LaCrO3 (101) Intensity (a.u.) LaFeO3 La2CrFeO6 13 Figure 2(a)...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.